The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt – 18th
January 2021
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd
force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm
this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the
moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement
through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee
orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't
revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000
km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ))
by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon
actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more
near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)

I do this research
2nd
2
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be
created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd
Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity
Force)
- Also the 2nd
hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the
moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).

I do this research
2nd
3
Contents
Subject Page N
1- Introduction 4
2- The Moon Orbital Triangle Modification
2-1 The Moon Orbital Triangle Modification
2-2 The Moon Orbital Triangle Data Analysis
5
6
10
3- The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-1 Why Does The Moon Use Pythagoras Triangle In Its Motion?
3-2 How Does The Moon Use Pythagoras Triangle In Its Motion?
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-4 The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
11
12
13
15
18
4-The Moon Orbit Geometrical Design
4-1 Preface
4-2 The Necessity Of Pythagoras Triangle (1, 2, 51/2
)
4-3 Why The Moon Displacement Daily =88000 km?
4-4 The Moon Motion Angle (12.195 degrees) Analysis
4-5 Why The Moon Day Period =29.53 solar days?
27
27
28
33
34
37
5- The Moon Orbital Triangle Benefits
5-1 Preface
5-2 The Moon orbital triangle shows that (2nd
force effect on the moon motion)
5-3 The Moon orbital triangle shows that (There's 2nd
Orbit for the moon motion)
38
38
39
41
6- Metonic Cycle Is A Proof of Uranus Effect On The Moon Motion
6-1 Preface
6-2 Uranus Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion
6-3 Uranus, The Moon And Pluto Motions Interaction
42
43
44
46
7- Uranus Motion Analysis
7-1 Uranus Motion During 1440 Of Its Days Period
7-2 Uranus Motion During 8 Pluto Days period
7-3 Uranus 144 days Cycle
7-4 The Interaction angle 71.9 degrees
7-5 The Moon Diameter Creation.
54
54
56
61
73
67
8- Appendix No.1 74

I do this research
2nd
4
1- Introduction
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
- The moon motion 4 basic points were the method by which I have discovered that,
the moon motion 4 basic points are:
o Perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm), the most near point the moon can reach to Earth.
o Apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm), the most far point the moon can reach from
Earth
o Total Solar Eclipse radius (r= 0.373 mkm), the moon creates A total solar
eclipse when the moon be at this distance from Earth or Shorter.
o The Moon Orbital distance (r=0.384 mkm), this value is the registered one
in the moon data sheet as the moon orbital distance.
- These 4 points are defined based on each other by Pythagoras rule:
o (363000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (373000 km)2
o (373000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (384000 km)2
o (384000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (393000 km)2
o (393000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (406000 km)2
(Error 1%)
- Based on this data, the concept is discovered that, The Moon Uses Pythagoras
Triangle As One Of The Moon Orbital Motion Techniques
- But 2 questions are raised with this concept (1st
question) why does the moon use
Pythagoras triangle? (2nd
question) What's this dimension (86000 km) which is
used frequently in the previous data?
- By answering these question, the following tools are discovered
o The Moon Orbital Triangle
o The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
- These 2 tools are new discovered and proved to be useful in the moon motion
study and analysis. The next point refers to the moon orbital triangle and the next
one introduce the moon orbital motion equation, which can help to prove the paper
2 hypotheses.

I do this research
2nd
5
2- The Moon Orbital Triangle Modification
2-1 The Moon Orbital Triangle Modification

I do this research
2nd
6
2-1- The Moon Orbital Triangle Modification
- The Moon Orbital Triangle Data
- (E) refers to Earth
- AE is the Earth Ecliptic Line
- P and G (The Moon motion 2 Points Perigee And Apogee)
- The line PX is the moon Axis has an angle 88.5 degrees with the Earth ecliptic line
- CP is perpendicular on AE on the point (B)
- The Point (A) is found on a distance 447563 km from the Earth on its ecliptic line.
- These are have 2 different triangles
- ECA is a vertical triangle (z-axis)
- EGA is a horizontal triangle (x-y plain)
- Let's explain them in following
- The Horizontal Triangle EGA Data
o EB= 361563 km
o EP = 363000 km (= Perigee Radius)
o EG = 406000 km (= Apogee Radius)
o EC = 371650 km
o EA = 447563 km (=Jupiter Circumference)
o PG = 43000 km (the distance from perigee to apogee)

I do this research
2nd
7
o PB = 32269 km
o GA = 56270 km
o GH = 36091 km
o DH = 12669.5 km
o BH = 42830 km
o AH = 43170 km
o GD = 38248.3 km
o PX = 32280.3 km
o BX= 845 km
o The angle AEG = 5.1 degrees (the moon orbital inclination)
o The angle EAG = 39.9 degrees (the moon orbital inclination)
o The angle G = 135 degrees
o The angle HGD = 19.33 degrees
o The angle HDG = 70.67 degrees
o The angle XPB = 1.5 degrees
o The angle BXP = 88.5 degrees
o The angle EPX = 86.4 degrees
- The Vertical Triangle ECA Data
o The line BC (=86000 km) is created perpendicular on the ecliptic EA
o The distance BA = 86000 km
o So the triangle ACB is an isosceles triangle (each =86000 km)
o CA = 121622 km
o The angle BAC = the angle ACB = 45 degrees
o The angle C =121.62 degrees
o The angle CEA = 13.379 degrees
o The angle BCD = 19.33 degrees
o The angle DCA = 25.67 degrees

I do this research
2nd
8
Notice
- This figure of 2 circles I have I brought from internet to use in the Explanation -
- We have supposed that the inner circle is Perigee orbit and the outer circle is
apogee orbit, And we have calculated the tangent DB = 181843 km
- AB = 363686 km (= Perigee Radius Approximately)
- Perigee radius r =0.363 mkm
- Apogee radius r =0.406 mkm
- Based on that,
- the triangle (ODB) is a specific Pythagoras triangle (1, 2 and 51/2
)
- The triangle (ODB) angles are 26.564 deg. and 63.435 deg.
- In analysis for the moon orbital triangle we should try to know why this specific
Pythagoras triangle (1, 2 and 51/2
) is a necessary requirements for the moon orbital
geometrical structure.

I do this research
2nd
9
- The Moon Orbital Triangle Concept
- The moon orbital triangle is consisted of 2 triangles,
- (1st
Triangle) a horizontal triangle (EGA) is found on (x-y plain) and this triangle
shows the moon orbital motion real data. Let's explain it in following
o EA is the Earth Ecliptic Line. We know that, the moon equator line has an
angle with Earth ecliptic =1.543 degrees, I use the perpendicular line on the
moon equator and this perpendicular line is the moon axis, by that the moon
axis (XP) has an angle 88.5 degrees with the ecliptic line.
o I choose the point (P) (Perigee Point) to create a perpendicular line (a
horizontal line on x-y plain) from it on the ecliptic line which forms the
triangle (BXP).
o On the point (B) I have created a vertical perpendicular line (z-axis) which
is the line BC (86000 km).
o I have connected the point (G) (apogee point) with (A) on the ecliptic line to
create the triangle (EGA)
o The moon moves from perigee to apogee, for that I connect the point G & D
(on the ecliptic line) and the point D is connected with the point (C), the
angles are equal (19.33 degrees) and the dimensions are rated
- (2nd
Triangle) a vertical triangle is found on (z-axis) (The triangle ECA)
o I suppose that, a vertical force effects on the moon orbital motion, and this
vertical force creates the line BC (86000 km) perpendicular on Earth
Ecliptic Line. This triangle is found on (z-axis plain).
o The angle (BCD) (=19.33 degrees) express the moon motion from perigee to
apogee (in the vertical triangle).
o This vertical triangle is created to support the hypothesis proof that (Uranus
effects on the moon orbital motion an causes to create Metonic Cycle.)

I do this research
2nd
10
- The moon orbital triangle is a good tool to see the geometrical depth behind the
moon orbital motion, where this triangle we should discuss as deep as possible,
and that will show many interesting geometrical discoveries …
- For example, the Point (A) should get our attention, let's see why
o The Point (A) I have created as a point on the Earth ecliptic line, the
distance from Earth to the point (A)= 447563 km (= Jupiter Circumference),
I have invented this point (A), but the geometrical dimensions tells that
some geometrical mechanism is found behind, for example
o The perimeter of the triangle (ECA) = 940835 km …. But the lunar umbra
length = 1.392 million km…. but
o The distance from the Point (A) to the end of the lunar umbra length =
940835 km, that means, the distance from the Point (A) to the lunar umbra
end = the perimeter of the triangle (ECA) Why?
o The distance AC = 121622 km but Saturn diameter =120536 km (error 1%)
o The distance EC = 371650 km but Saturn Circumference =378675 km (1%)
o The perpendicular line from the point G (apogee point r=406000 km) on the
triangle base (EA) (the Earth Ecliptic line) divided the distance into HA
=43170 km and HB = 42830 km almost the middle point of the distance BA
(=86000 km) where the distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km… such
division of distances must be done by geometrical mechanism.
o The angle AEC =13.37 degrees …….but
o Earth orbital period 365.25 days = 13.37 x the moon orbital period 27.3 days
o I try to prove that, the triangle is built by the moon orbital motion real data
based on geometrical rules, by that, the triangle data isn't invented data but
discovered data, it's found by the moon orbital motion …
In point no. (4) we have to discuss the moon orbital triangle geometrical deign to
deepen this discussion as deep as possible.

I do this research
2nd
11
3- The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis

I do this research
2nd
12
- Let's summarize this question answer in following:
o The moon uses Pythagoras triangle basically to decrease its displacement
daily through its orbit
o The moon daily displacement = 88000 km and the moon has to move this
distance every day without any decreasing (later we will know why!)
o But
o If the moon moves by this displacement as its orbital displacement the moon
would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only (r=0.406 mkm)
o For that reason
o The moon creates an angle between its motion direction and its orbit
horizontal level to create a displacement through its orbit less than (88000
km)
o As a result of this technique, the moon can revolve around Earth through
more near orbits than apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm)
o Simply, because the moon uses this technique the moon can revolve around
Earth through perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
o Let's explain this intelligent technique with some details to show the useful
result of using Pythagoras triangle by the moon orbital motion….

I do this research
2nd
13
- The moon moves daily (88000 km) on the right triangle hypotenuse (AC), but the
moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal
level, by that the real displacement through the moon orbit will be (L= 88000 km
cos (θ)), and by that, spite the moon moves 88000 km, but the real orbital
horizontal displacement be less than (88000 km) and this is the objective for which
the moon uses Pythagoras triangle –
As an example,
- If (θ) =28.63 degrees, the real displacement (L== 88000 km cos (θ)) = 77237 km,
So, if the moon real displacement daily be (77237 km), during 29.53 days the
moon will pass a distance = 2.28 million km and this will be the moon orbital
circumference, where 2.28 mkm = 2π x (0.363 mkm)
- The Moon Orbital Perigee Radius =0.363 mkm
- That means, the moon by a real displacement =77237 km can move around Earth
through the perigee orbit (radius =0.363 mkm), this is the useful result the moon
performs by using Pythagoras triangle,
- Now let's suppose the moon doesn't use Pythagoras triangle, what would happen?
- The moon daily displacement = 88000 km, during 29.53 days the moon moves a
distance = 2.598 mkm where 2.598 mkm = 2π x (0.413 mkm)
- The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius =0.406 mkm
- So the moon will move along month revolving around Earth through its apogee
orbit (or even far from apogee orbit) because the total distance can't be passed
through any more near orbit around Earth…
- The data shows how Pythagoras triangle is so useful for the moon orbital motion.

I do this research
2nd
14
The Angle θ
- The angle (θ) should get our attention for its specific effect…let's summarize the
idea in following
o The angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L = 88000 cos (θ)), through the
moon orbit..
o We know that, when the real displacement (L) be shorter the moon can
move through near orbits to Earth and by that the moon can be near or at
Perigee radius (0.363 mkm)
o When the real displacement (L) be greater the moon has to move through
orbits far from Earth and by that the moon can be near or at apogee orbit
(r=0.406 mkm)
o That means, the angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L) and also
changes the distance between the moon to perigee or to apogee, shortly, the
angle (θ) defines the moon position (as a ship) between 2 river banks….
- The angle (θ) defines the moon orbital motion basic features and we have to
discuss is deeply with the moon orbital motion equation (θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees),
but before we need to analyze the moon orbital motion

I do this research
2nd
15
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion
- The moon moves per a solar day a motion typical to the Earth motion to avoid the
separation from Earth through their motions, based on this rule, the moon moves
per a solar day 2.573 million km with an angle declines on the horizontal level
0.98562 degrees as typical to Earth motion
- If there's no Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon effect on the moon motion,
the moon motion trajectory would to be a parallel line to Earth Motion Trajectory,
But Lorentz Length Contraction effects on the moon motion daily distance (2.573
mkm) with a rate 1.0725 and causes this distance to be contracted (2.399 mkm)
- The moon difficulties are started here, because the difference between both
distances (0.17 mkm) will cause the moon to be separated from Earth motion
inevitably
- We should notice that, these motions are done far from our observation, means, we
see nothing of this motion distance, because the moon moves on the Earth orbital
circumference revolving around the sun, but, even if we can't observe this motion
distance the motion is still fact and proved by its power, because the Earth moves
per a solar day 2.573 mkm and if the moon doesn't move this same distance every
solar day that necessities the moon to be separated from the Earth through their
motions course – based on that- the facts prove this motion regardless our
observation ability for it.
- Now the moon has an additional distance to be passed (0.17 mkm) and the moon
has to pass this distance on the same solar day to avoid the separation from the
Earth during their motions.
- Because of that, the moon moves its daily displacement (88000 km) depends on
Earth gravity force (by which we see the moon in the Earth sky), but the different
distance (0.17 mkm) to be covered still needs the moon to move one more
displacement (= 88000 km)

I do this research
2nd
16
- The previous explanation tells that, the moon has to move 2 displacements each =
88000 km, while we see one displacement only because it's done through the
moon orbital motion around Earth but the other displacement should be done also
because this total distance (0.17 mkm) is required to cover the different distance
and create the total (2.573 mkm) which saves the moon and Earth motions
accompanying.
- Now we have 2 basic information about the moon orbital motion
o (1st
information) the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion
o (2nd
information) the moon has to move 2 displacements each =88000 km
and their total distance =0.17 mkm which is a required distance necessary to
cover the difference between the moon and Earth motions distances.
- This explanation helps us to understand why the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in
its motion, because the moon can't decrease its daily displacement (88000 km)
because the moon needs this distance to cover the different distance between its
contracted motion distance (2.399 mkm) and Earth motion distance (2.573 mkm),
So the moon needs to move this displacement perfectly, but if it's used as a
displacement through the moon orbit, the moon would be always a prisoner in the
apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm) as we have discussed before, because of that, the
moon creates Pythagoras triangle technique by which the moon moves actually
88000 km daily but the real displacement through the moon orbit became less (L =
88000 Cos θ) and by that the moon can achieve 2 objectives, First to pass the
required distance (88000 km) and Second to move in near orbits to Earth, that
shows the intelligent moon motion technique…
- (Notice, Lorentz Length Contraction Effect Discussion is in Appendix No. 1)

I do this research
2nd
17
The Moon Orbital Motion Needs One More Orbit
- The previous explanation tells that, the moon moves 2 displacements each =88000
km, we see one of these 2 displacements but where's the other displacement?!
- We know that, the moon original motion (2.573 mkm) which is contracted to be
(2.399 mkm) isn't seen by us because the moon moves this distance revolving with
Earth around the sun along the Earth Orbital Circumference
- We may accept that, the 2nd
displacement the moon does on this same trajectory
and isn't seen by us.
- So,
- There must be one more orbit for the moon to move through this 2nd
displacement.
means,
- There's 2nd
Orbits For The Moon Motion
- But
- How can we discover this second orbit if we can't observe the 2nd
displacement
motion?
- We can discover this 2nd
orbit by the moon orbit data analysis. So we should
depend on the moon orbital triangle data analysis to define this 2nd
orbit position.
- For that we have to discuss the moon 2nd
orbit in our deep analysis of The Moon
Orbital Triangle Geometrical Structure.

I do this research
2nd
18
3-4-1 The Equation Concept
3-4-2 The Equation Test and Accuracy
3-4-1 The Equation Concept
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- The moon orbital motion equation is created depending on the concept we have
discussed before which is (the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion)
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle and by this intelligent technique the moon be
under control of the angle (θ) change
- The angle (θ) defines almost all the moon motion features.…
- The moon uses this technique, aiming to create a real displacement shorter than its
actual displacement (88000 km) based on the equation (L =88000 cos (θ)) and by
that while the moon moves a displacement =88000 km but the real displacement
(L) through its orbit be shorter than 88000 km and by that the moon can revolve
around Earth through more near orbits than its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm).
- The moon orbital motion equation depends on this concept and, the equation
uses (the constant) 1.7 degrees as the moon daily motion degrees, and the equation
uses the previous day angle (θ0) to produce the today angle (θ1)
- We have 3 questions in this equation which are:
o How does this equation work?
o Is this equation trustee and correct?
o Why does the equation use the angle 1.7 degrees? Let's try to answer….

I do this research
2nd
19
How to use this equation?
- Perigee Radius =0.363 mkm, so Its Orbital Circumference =2.28 mkm
- Suppose the moon will revolve around Earth through perigee orbit only during
29.53 days, so
- (2.28 mkm /29.53 days) = 77237 km
- This is (the real displacement = L = 88000 km Cos θ = 77237 km),
- What's the angle θ value? the angle θ = 28.63 degrees
- Suppose the moon stand on this point yesterday with the angle (θ) =28.63 degrees,
where the moon will move today?
- From Perigee (the most near point to Earth) the moon will move in Ascending
motion because it moves from perigee (0.363 mkm) to apogee (0.406 mkm)
- In Ascending motion we use (-1.7 degrees) because the angle (θ) is decreased
where the real displacement (L) is increased, So let's do that in following
o (θ1= θ0 - 1.7 degrees)
o (θ1= 28.63 degrees - 1.7 degrees) = 26.93 degrees
o L = 88000 Cos (26.93 degrees) = 78454 km
o During 29.53 days so (78454 km x 29.53 days = 2.316 mkm)
o 2.316 mkm = 2π x 368722 km
That means
o The moon was (before motion) on Perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm) and starts
its motion displacement 88000 km. For day motion the equation uses 1.7
degrees, that means, the moon on perigee uses Pythagoras triangle with
angle (28.63 degrees) and during one solar day the moon uses - 1.7 degrees
and by that the angle will be (26.93 degrees)…... The angle 1.7 degrees
expresses The Moon Daily Motion
o By using Pythagoras triangle its angle (θ) = 26.93 degrees, the displacement
(88000 km) will create a real displacement through the moon orbit = 78454
km and the moon will finish its motion today at a distance 368722 km

I do this research
2nd
20
means the moon is far from perigee radius with (368722 km-363000 km
=5722 km )
o So, the moon after 1 day motion (tomorrow) will be at the point 368722 km
and will have the Pythagoras triangle its angle 26.93 degrees.
The Descending Motion
o When the moon moves from apogee (0.406 mkm) to perigee (0.363 mkm),
so the angle (1.7 degrees) will be positive (+1.7 degrees) because the angle
(θ) is increased and the real displacement (L = 88000 Cos (θ)) be shorter.
So
o If the moon in apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm), what's the angle (θ)?
o The apogee orbital circumference = 0.406 mkm x2π =2.55 mkm = 29.53
days x 86400 km, the angle (θ) = 10.96 degrees (=11 deg approx.)
o The moon moves from apogee to perigee (descending motion)
o (θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees) means (θ1= 11 degrees + 1.7 degrees) = 12.7 deg.
o L = 88000 Cos (12.7 degrees) = 85847 km
o During 29.53 days so (85847 km x 29.53 days = 2.535 mkm)
o 2.535 mkm = 2π x 403467 km
So
o After one day the moon will be on 403467 km far from apogee (406000 km)
with 2540 km
Now let's see this equation test and efficiency in following

I do this research
2nd
21
3-4-2 The Equation Test and Accuracy
- I have tested the Equation with real data for 2 months June 2020 and October 2020
- The results are very good and I provide the results here for better vision
concerning the equation efficiency
1st
Test June 2020
Day Registered Data The Results (1.7) Difference
6-6-2020 369418 km
7-6-2020 373729 km 374772.5 - 1044
8-6-2020 378917 km 378821.5 96
9-6-2020 384534 km 383667.7 867
10-6-2020 390096 km 388890 1206
11-6-2020 395156 km 394000 1156
12-6-2020 399345 km 398604.2 741
13-6-2020 402395 km 402361.3 34
14-6-2020 404153 km 405052.8 -900
15-6-2020 404574 km ---- ---
16-6-2020 403718 km 401848.5 1870
17-6-2020 401733 km 400876.1 857
18-6-2020 398840 km 398640.7 200
19-6-2020 395303 km 395417.4 115
20-6-2020 391409 km 391521.2 -113
21-6-2020 387432 km 387273.4 159
22-6-2020 383607 km 382968.4 639
23-6-2020 380110 km 378852 1258
24-6-2020 377044 km 375107 1937
25-6-2020 374451 km 371836.5 2615
26-6-2020 372338 km 369077 3262
27-6-2020 370703 km 366855.6 3847
[

I do this research
2nd
22
The 1st
Test Results Analysis:
- The Total Results Are 20 Values
(1st
Category)
o 15 values, defines the moon position in range 1300 km (Error 3%)
(2nd
Category)
o 2 values, defines the moon position in range 1300-2000 km (Error 4.6 %)
(3rd
Category)
o 3 values, defines the moon position in range 2000-3500 km (Error 8 %)
- The Results Explanation
- The distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km…
o 1st
Category of results defines the moon position in error range (1300 km) =
error (3%), that means, (15 values of 20) defines the moon position with
error (3%) only (Small Error Range)
o 2nd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (1300
km to 2000 km) = error (4.5%), that means (2 values of 20) defines the
moon position with error (4.5%) (Average Error Range)
o 3rd
km to 3500 km) = error (8%), that means (3 values of 20) defines the moon
position with error (8%) (Great Error Range)
- The Equation Accuracy
o The previous explanation shows that, the equation has a good range of
accuracy and its error is in the acceptable error range
The Conclusion
The Equation Is correct and trustee
And
It's a useful tool to define the moon position daily

I do this research
2nd
23
2nd
Test October 2020
Day Registered Data Results (1.7) Difference
5-10-2020 405,690 km --- ---
6-10-2020 404,171 km 403125.3 km 1046 km
7-10-2020 401,649 km 401390 km 259 km
8-10-2020 398,073 km 398545.6 Km - 473 km
9-10-2020 393,464 km 394568.8 km -1105 km
10-10-2020 387,944 km 389510 km -1567 km
11-10-2020 381,763 km 383520 km -1758 km
12-10-2020 375,302 km 376875.3km -1574 km
13-10-2020 369,063 km 369981km -919 km
14-10-2020 363,617 km 363363.4km 254 km
15-10-2020 359,530 km 357612 km 1918 km
16-10-2020 357,269 km 353307 km 3962 km
17-10-2020 357,105 km ---- --
18-10-2020 359,048 km --- --
19-10-2020 362,851 km 364979.7 km - 2129 km
20-10-2020 368,058 km 368579.3 km -522 km
21-10-2020 374,101 km 373492.4 km 609 km
22-10-2020 380,412 km 379168.3 Km 1244 Km
23-10-2020 386,497 km 385059.3Km 1438 km
24-10-2020 391,989 km 390694.3 km 1295 km
25-10-2020 396,659 km 395729.5 km 930 km
26-10-2020 400,395 km 399958.7 km 437 km
27-10-2020 403,181 km 403299 km 112 km
28-10-2020 405,059 km 405738.5 km -680 km
29-10-2020 406,104 km 407359.4 km -1256 km
[

I do this research
2nd
24
The Test Results Analysis:
- The Total Results Are 22 Values
(1st
Category)
o 15 values, defines the moon position in range 1300 km (Error 3%)
(2nd
Category)
o 5 values, defines the moon position in range 1300-2000 km (Error 4.6 %)
(3rd
Category)
o 2 values, defines the moon position in range 2000-3500 km (Error 8 %)
- The Results Explanation
- The distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km…
o 1st
Category of results defines the moon position in error range (1300 km) =
error (3%), that means, (15 values of 22) defines the moon position with
error (3%) only (Small Error Range)
o 2nd
km to 2000 km) = error (4.5%), that means (5 values of 22) defines the
moon position with error (4.5%) (Average Error Range)
o 3rd
km to 3500 km) = error (8%), that means (2 values of 22) defines the moon
position with error (8%) (Great Error Range)
- The Equation Accuracy
o The previous explanation shows that, the equation has a good range of
accuracy and its error is in the acceptable error range
The Conclusion
The Equation Is correct and trustee
And
It's a useful tool to define the moon position daily

I do this research
2nd
25
3-4-3 The Value 1.7 degrees
- The 3rd
question was, why the equation uses 1.7 degrees?
Because
1.7 degrees = 0.98562 degrees + 0.712 degrees
Where
- 0.98562 degrees = Earth motion daily degrees, and it equals the moon daily
motion degrees because the moon has to move an equal distance to Earth motion
daily distance to save their motions accompanying
- This question and the angle 0.712 degrees is discussed deeply in the next point
(4-The Moon Orbit Geometrical Design)

I do this research
2nd
26
The Moon Motion Difficulties
- There are 2 basic difficulties are observed in the moon orbital motions, let's refer
to them in following:
o (1st
Difficulty) The moon moves per day different distances from perigee to
apogee…..
o We know the moon moves from perigee to apogee (go and back) during
Anomalistic month (27.55 solar days)
o (43000 km x 2) / 27.55 days = 3122 km
o The moon doesn't use this rate (3122 km) in its motion, instead the moon
can move (6000 km) on one day only and on another day may move only
2500 km (or even less)!
o The moon orbital equation tries to solve this difficulty by using the rate 1.7
degrees in the equation (θ1 = θ0 + 1.7 degrees), the value 1.7 degrees is a
great number and enables the moon to move around (5000 km) per solar day
and by that if the moon moves per solar day 4000 km the different distance
will be 1000 km and if the moon moves 6000 km the different will be
– 1000 km, it’s the same difference, and by that, the error be more less
enables the equation to be more efficient..
o (2nd
Difficulty) The moon stays in perigee and apogee points long time….
o That means, while the moon be on perigee or apogee, the moon doesn't use
the equation and doesn't change its distance to perigee or apogee for long
days…we may notice that in the equation tests, when the moon reach to
perigee or apogee the equation stops its work and stays 2 or 3 days to return
to its work… because the moon consumes long time to leave the points
(perigee and apogee)…

I do this research
2nd
27
4-The Moon Orbit Geometrical Design
4-1 Preface
4-2 The Necessity Of Pythagoras Triangle (1, 2, 51/2
)
4-3 Why The Moon Displacement Daily =88000 km?
4-4 The moon motion angle (12.195 degrees) Analysis
4-1 Preface
On What Facts This Study Depend?
On The Logical Geometrical Structure
- The point (A) analysis which we discussed in point no. 1 can be used as a useful
example here, there's a geometrical reason to find this point (A) because the data
which is created based on it is very similar to the moon orbital motion data, where
I have invented this point to be at a distance 447563 km from Earth on its ecliptic
line, it's my invention, many dimensions depend on it refers to the moon orbital
motion data… in following we should analyze the moon orbital triangle
geometrical basics to see if this triangle is found based on real geometrical design
depends on the moon orbital motion data or it's just invented triangle, in this
process we depend on the Triangle Logical Geometrical Structure which can be a
good proof for its existence.

I do this research
2nd
28
4-2 The Necessity of Pythagoras Triangle (1, 2, 51/2
)
Why Pythagoras Triangle (1,2, 51/2
) Is Required Necessary For The Moon
Orbital Motion?
This figure is discussed with Moon Orb. Triangle (Point No.1)
- DB = 181843 km
- OB = 406000 km = Apogee Radius
- OR = 363000 km = Perigee Radius
- Perigee Orbital Circumference = 2.28 mkm
- Apogee Orbital Circumference = 2.55 mkm
I - Data
(1)
(DB / Perigee Orb. Circumference) = (181843 km/2.28 mkm) = 0.08
(2)
37 = 95.1 x 1.44
10.96 = 37 x 0.08
(3)
95.6 deg + 1.1 deg = 96.7 deg
96.7 deg + 1.1 deg = 97.8 deg
97.8 deg + 1.1 deg = 98.9 deg
(4)
8.9 degrees x 0.08 = 0.712 degrees

I do this research
2nd
29
II – Discussion
Equation No. (2)
37 = 95.1 x 1.44
10.96 = 37 x 0.08
1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regression monthly
95.1 degrees = 90 degrees +5.1 degrees (the moon orbital inclination)
- Equation no. (2) shows how the angle (10.96 degrees) is created by using the rate
0.08, which is produced between (DB 181843 km) and the moon perigee orbital
circumference (2.28 mkm)
- This equation shows the geometrical necessity of Pythagoras triangle (1,2,51/2
)
- The rate 0.08 is required to be used by the moon orbit regression degrees monthly
and the moon orbital inclination (vertically) to produce the angle 10.96 deg.
Equation No. (2-2)
- Sin (10.96 degrees) x 406000 km = 77237 km
- 77237 km x 29.53 days = 2.28 mkm= 2π x 0.363 mkm (perigee radius)
- The angle (10.96 degrees) connects between perigee and apogee radiuses and the
available moon displacements through both orbits. That shows the angle (10.96
deg) is created based on the moon orbital geometrical structure.
- The data shows that, the moon orbital radiuses apogee and period (which define
the moon motion limits) are created by an effect of the moon orbital inclination
and its regression degrees per month, showing that, the moon motion limits
between perigee and apogee are defined based on geometrical mechanism.
Equation No. (2-3)
- Cos (10.96 degrees) 88000 km = 86400 km
- The Moon Orbital Apogee Circumference = 2π x 0.406 mkm = 2.55 mkm
- The Apogee Orbit permits a daily displacement = 86400 km ……Because
- 2.55 mkm = 86400 km x 29.53 solar days (the moon day period)

I do this research
2nd
30
But
- With a displacement 88000 km during 29.53 days the total distance = 2.598 mkm
Where
- 2.598 mkm = 2π x 0.413 mkm,
- The Moon Apogee Radius =0.406 mkm !
- This analysis proves the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique in its motion
otherwise the apogee radius should be changed to 0.413 mkm
- This analysis also is useful to show the massive effect on the angle (10.96 deg).
which is still needs to explain.
Equation No. (2-4)
- Sin (10.96 degrees) 447563 km = 85093 km
- Where
- 447563 km = EA = The Moon Orbital Triangle Base (The Green Line)
- 86000 km = BC (The Red Line) (error 1%)
- The equation shows more geometrical effects of the angle (10.96 degrees)
Equation No. (2-5)
- 43000 km x 0.08 =3475 km (error 1%)
- Where
- 43000 km = The distance from perigee to apogee
- 3475 km = The moon diameter
- Again the original rate (0.08) shows effect on more data

I do this research
2nd
31
Equation No. (3)
95.6 deg + 1.1 deg = 96.7 deg
96.7 deg + 1.1 deg = 97.8 deg
97.8 deg + 1.1 deg = 98.9 deg
Where
95.6 degrees = 90 degrees + 0.5 degrees + 5.1 degrees (The Moon orbital inclination)
96.7 degrees = 90 degrees + 6.7 degrees (The Moon Axial Tilt)
97.8 degrees = Uranus Axial Tilt
96.7 degrees = 90 degrees + 8.9 degrees
1.1 degrees = the angle between the moon orbital triangle base (EA) and the moon
equator line.
Where
1.1 degrees = 97.8 deg (Uranus Axial Tilt) – 96.7 degrees
96.7 degrees = 90 degrees + 6.7 degrees (The Moon Axial Tilt)
- Equation no. (3) shows that the angle (1.1 degrees) is used widely for the data,
shows that the angle has a geometrical necessity … but this data refers to some
other important fact, let's explain it in following
- The Moon Orbital Circumference at apogee radius = 2.55 mkm (100%)
- Earth Daily Motion Distance = 2.5734 mkm (101%)
- The displacements 88000 km total during (29.53 days) = 2.5986 mkm (102%)
- The moon has these 3 values, because the moon has to move equal distance to
Earth motion distance daily to save their motions accompanying.
- Why these distances are rated as such (100, 101, 102)? This discussion we should
deal with the question (Why the moon daily displacement =88000 km)? which will
be our next point of discussion (Point 4-3).

I do this research
2nd
32
Equation No. (4)
8.9 degrees x 0.08 = 0.712 degrees
Where
8.9 degrees = 98.9 degrees – 90 degrees
- We remember the moon orbital motion equation
- Why does the equation use the constant 1.7 degrees for moon daily motion?
Because
1.7 degrees = 0.98562 degrees + 0.712 degrees
Where
- 0.98562 degrees = Earth motion daily degrees, and it equals the moon daily motion
degrees because the moon has to move an equal distance to Earth motion daily
distance to save their motions accompanying
- 0.712 degrees is produced based on the value 8.9 degrees, where this value is
produced from the deep interaction found in Equation no. (4), and to see this angle
importance we have to see the depth behind the value 8.9 degrees, which can be
done with answer the question (Why the moon daily displacement =88000 km)?
- Let's do that in following

I do this research
2nd
33
4-3 Why The Moon Displacement Daily =88000 Km?
Earth motion distance during its day period = the moon displacements total
during its day period = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
I - Data
(1)
Earth moves during (6939.75 solar days) a distance = 17859.325 mkm
(2)
Pluto moves during (6939.75) x (153.3 hours) a distance = 18000.57 mkm
(3)
The moon displacements total during (6939.75) x (29.53 days) = 18034.278 mkm
(4)
Uranus Orbital Circumference = 18048.449 mkm
Where 153.3 hours = Pluto day period 29.53 days = the moon day period
The moon daily displacement =88000 km
II - Data Analysis
(4) – (1) = 189.124 mkm
(4) – (2) = 47.879 mkm
(4) – (3) = 14.171 mkm
(3) – (1) = 174.953 mkm
(3) – (2) = 33.708 mkm
(2) – (1) = 141.245 mkm
- Sin (17.2) x 47.879 mkm = 14.171 mkm
- Tan (10.96) x 174.953 mkm = 33.708 mkm
- Tan (13.3) x 141.245 mkm = 33.708 mkm (error 1%)
- 0.8 x 174.953 mkm = 141.245 mkm (error 1%)
o 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination.
o 17.2 degrees = Pluto Orbital Inclination
o 13.3 degrees = The angle of (E) in the moon orbital inclination
o 10.96 degrees (Cos 10.96 degrees x 88000 km = 86400 km)

I do this research
2nd
34
III –Discussion
- The previous 4 angles are the basics data for their planets, let's try to show that
o 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination
o 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt) x 0.8 = 97.8 deg (Uranus Axial Tilt)
o Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 degrees = 0.99 x 17.4 deg (The inner planets
orbital inclinations total) … also
o Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg x 7.1 = 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt)
o 13.37 degrees is the angle of point (E) (Earth) in the moon orbital triangle
(Earth Orb. Period 365.25 d = The moon Orb. Period 27.3 d x 13.37)
o The angle 10.96 degrees is used to define the moon orbital apogee radius
(r= 0.406 mkm) because (86400 km x 29.53 days = 2π x0.406 mkm). The
apogee orbit doesn't permits for a daily displacement greater than 86400 km,
where (Cos 10.96 degrees x 88000 km = 86400 km).
There's an interaction occurred here between these 4 planets (Uranus, Pluto, Earth and
its moon), and in this interaction, these 4 basic values are created and based on these 4
values many other data of these planets is created … means, this interaction forms the
geometrical structure of these planets motions …. And if we limited our discussion
for the moon orbit structure, that lead us to conclude that, the moon orbit geometrical
structure is effected by these 4 planets motions interaction as seen in the data.
i.e. these 4 planets motions interaction effects on the moon orbital motion and causes
to create Metonic Cycle.
That supports the 2nd
hypothesis (Metonic Cycle is a proof of Uranus motion effect on
the moon motion.)
(This discussion is extended with full detail in Metonic Cycle discussion Point No. 6)

I do this research
2nd
35
4-4 The Moon Motion Angle (12.195 degrees) Analysis
I-Data
(I)
Sin (12.195 degrees) x 407300 km = 88000 km
And
13.177 degrees – 0.98562 degrees = 12.195 degrees
(II)
(10.96 degrees) + 1.25 degrees =12.195 degrees
Where
13.177 degrees = the moon daily motion degrees
0.98562 degrees = Earth daily motion degrees
0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination
II- Discussion
- The Apogee Orbit (r=0.406 mkm) permits a displacement =86400 km only based
on the valuable angle (10.96 degrees), as maximum displacement during 29.53
days because (86400 km x 29.53 days = 2.55 mkm = 2π x 0.406 mkm)
- But
- What about the actual displacement 88000 km, which angle expresses it?
- The data shows that, the angle 12.195 degrees can define this displacement (88000
km) relative to the radius (407300 km) which is very near to apogee radius =
(406000 km) (error 0.3%).
- Equation No (II) tells that, Uranus orbital inclination 0.8 degrees is used as (1/0.8),
i.e.
- The angle (10.96 degrees) + (1/0.8 degrees) = 12.195 degrees
- The data shows Uranus effect on the moon orbital motion

I do this research
2nd
36
NOTICE
The following explanation shows a new geometrical technique is used in the moon
geometrical structure, it's just example using the angle 12.195 deg in this technique
I-Data
- In the triangle ABC
- AB = 12.195 km
- AC = 2 x 29.53 km
- The Angle A = 78.081
- The Angle C = 11.919 degrees
- But
- Cos (12.195 degrees) x 12.195 degrees = 11.919 degrees
1- How This Triangle Is Created?
- The geometrical structure uses the angle 12.195 degrees as a distance= 12.195 km,
and creates the angle (C) depends on the angle 12.195 degrees as the data shows
- So this triangle is created depending on the angle 12.195 degrees
2- This Triangle Purpose
- The triangle aims to create the hypotenuse AC = 59.06 km = 2 x 29.53 km
3- Why This Triangle Is Created?
- To create the value (29.53 km) depends on the value 12.195 degrees geometrically,
both data is the moon motion data, but the triangle tries to connect both data
geometrically, why? because Nothing is independent (the geometrical concept),
because of that, the new data should be created based on the old data, and by that
there's always one line connecting all data
- This simple example is for this technique explanation.. and the rate (1km=1degree)
is used here only and not a general rate, although the value (2x 29.53) is used more
widely than (29.53) in all data. (For example, Earth during 59 days moves a
distance = its orbital distance "Error 1%" ).

I do this research
2nd
37
I-Data
Equation No. (A)
Tan (12.195 deg) x 708.7 hours (the moon day period) = 153.3 h (Pluto day period)
Tan (13.177 deg) x 655.7 h. (the moon rotation period) = 153.3 h (Pluto day period)
- The angle 12.195 deg. is the moon angle (12.195 deg. = 13.177 deg. - 0.9856 deg),
Based on this angle the moon & Pluto days periods are defined relative to each
other… Why?
- The angle 13.177 degrees is the moon motion daily angle (360 =13.17 deg x 27.3)
and based on this angle the moon & Pluto rotations periods are defined relative to
each other… Why?
- Why the moon day period =29.53 solar days? Because the moon day period is
created in proportionality with Pluto day period and both are created relative to
each other…..But the better question is ….
Why Earth day period =24 hours?
Equation No. (B)
Tan (8.9 deg) x 153.3h (Pluto day period) = 24 hours
- The angle 8.9 degrees =98.9 degrees – 90 degrees (discussed before)
- By this angle Earth and Pluto days periods are created relative to each other!
- Pluto, Earth and the moon motions are interacted because of their motion distances
relative to Uranus orbital circumference (discussed before) means this data is a
small part of the wide range data which we have to discuss in Metonic Cycle
discussion (Point No.6)
Shortly
- The moon day period (= 29.53 solar days) because it's created by 2 motions effect
on the moon orbital motion (Earth & Uranus motions) through the 4 planets
motions interaction. (Metonic Cycle is discussed in Point No. 6)

I do this research
2nd
38
5- The Moon Orbital Triangle Geometrical Benefits
5-1 Preface
5-2 The Moon orbital triangle shows that (2nd
5-3 The Moon orbital triangle shows that (There's 2nd
5-1 Preface
- The moon orbital triangle geometrical analysis provides a new and effective idea
let's summarizes it in following
o The moon orbital triangle shows that many forces effect on the moon orbital
motion because of that many geometrical rules are used in this motion to
define each force balancing points
o I refer to Earth gravity force effect on the moon motion as 1st
force
o I refer to all other planets effects on the moon motion as 2nd
force
o The sun gravity force is considered to be including into both forces
- The triangle shows that, many forces (or motions) interaction effects on the moon
motion and by that the moon orbit geometrical design became a specific one,
showing these forces effects.
- The triangle analysis depends on the Logical Geometrical Analysis, for that, the
absent data can be concluded and (more important) the forces created this data can
be discovered
- Based on that, Jupiter and Uranus (in addition to other planets) have effects on the
moon orbital motion. this conclusion can be formed by the moon orbital triangle
data analysis.
- This analysis can support the paper hypotheses which are: (1st
) (There's 2nd
force
effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion) (2nd
) (Uranus Motion effects on
the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle)

I do this research
2nd
39
5-2 The Moon orbital triangle shows (2nd
- What Proves Can Be Provided For The 2nd
Force Hypothesis?
o (1st
Proof) The Point (A) In The Moon Orbital Triangle
o (2nd
Proof) The 2nd
Displacement 88000 km
o (3rd
Proof) Metonic Cycle Creation.
Let's discuss these 3 proves in following:
(1st
Proof)
- The moon orbital triangle causes to raise the question, because the Point (A) is one
of its 3 basic points and no force we know can create this Point (A) which is found
far from apogee radius.
- So how this point (A) is found and effects on the moon orbital triangle? We have
no answer except that 2nd
force is found effects on the moon orbital motion, this 2nd
force effects on the Point (A). So Earth gravity force effects on the moon motion
on one side and this 2nd
force effects on the moon motion on other side to create
general balancing of the moon motion.
- Although no clear definition for the force creates the point (A), this force is still
fact because of the geometrical massive significance of the point (A).
- means, the point (A) should be considered as a proof for this force existence

I do this research
2nd
40
(2nd
Proof) The 2nd
Displacement 88000 km
- The moon orbital motion story tells us, the moon contracted distance (2.399 mkm)
needs (0.17 mkm) to be = Earth motion distance (2.573 mkm) per solar day, and
the moon has to move this additional distance (0.17 mkm) on the same solar day,
But the moon daily displacement =88000 km, means, the moon has to move one
more displacement (88000 km) which we don't see…
- If this story is real, and the distance 0.17 mkm should be passed, and if 1 force
only effects on the moon, so this force should cause the moon to move 0.17 mkm
completely…but the moon displacement is only (a half) of the required distance…
that tells us there are 2 forces causes 2 equal displacements.
- The argument here depends on the moon basic motion (2.573 mkm) which creates
the moon daily displacement (88000 km), if the connection between these 2
distances is a real one, so the 2nd
displacement must be a fact and that necessitates
to find 2nd
force effects on the moon orbital motion.
(3rd
Proof) Metonic Cycle Creation.
- Uranus Orbital Circumference =19 Earth Orbital Circumference …… means
- While Uranus revolves around the sun one revolution, Earth (and its moon)
revolve around the sun 19 revolutions (19 years =6939.75 solar days)
- If Uranus motion effect on the Earth moon motion, the period 19 years should be
seen in this effect data because it’s the basic rate between the 2 orbits
- The moon Metonic Cycle (6939.75 solar days=19 years) tells that, there's a
possibility of Uranus motion effect on the moon motion..
- The point is, if Uranus really effects on the moon orbital motion to create Metonic
Cycle, so this will be a solution for the question (What's this 2nd
force effects on
the moon orbital motion), or at least will give us a light to see other players effect
on the moon orbital motion in place of the one planet gravity effect vision.

I do this research
2nd
41
5-3 The Moon orbital triangle shows (There's 2nd
I- Data
(1)
The moon orbital triangle (ECA) Perimeter = 940835 km
The Lunar Eclipse Umbra Length = 1.392 mkm
The distance (EA) = 447563 km + (The Perimeter) 940835 km = 1.392 mkm (0.2%)
II- Discussion
- The Point (A) divides (the lunar eclipse umbra length) into 2 equal parts, after the
Point (A) this part is seen in the triangle perimeter (ECA) and
- Before the Point (A) this part is seen in the distance from the Point (A) to the end
of The Lunar Eclipse Umbra Length
- Can This Be A Proof?
- The geometrical division is a proof, because the moon orbit data is created based
on geometrical interactions for that reason the moon orbital triangle shows these
geometrical interactions and rules, and these geometrical rules tell, many players
are interacted here –for that reason, the triangle (ECA) perimeter has a relationship
with The Lunar Eclipse Umbra Length (Where the geometrical necessity of this
relationship still need to be caught, but the mere existence of this relationship is a
proof for different players effect on the moon orbital geometrical creation).
- I want to say, the moon orbit is NOT a trajectory of a rigid body revolves around
Earth, instead, it's a network of forces lines and the moon moves through this
networks taking into consideration these forces lines effects AND shows that in its
motion data.

I do this research
2nd
42
6- Metonic Cycle Is A Proof of Uranus Effect On The Moon Motion
6-1 Preface
6-2 Uranus Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion
6-3 The 4 Planets Motions Interaction
6-4 The Moon Orbital Triangle Proves Uranus Effect On The Moon Motion

I do this research
2nd
43
6-1 Preface
Paper 2nd
hypothesis
- The Earth Moon Metonic Cycle (6939.75 Solar Days) is created by Uranus
Motion Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion.
The Hypothesis Proves
o (1st
Proof) Uranus Orbital Circumference =19 Earth Orbital Circumference,
So while Uranus revolves around the sun 1 complete revolution the Earth
(with its moon) revolve around the sun 19 revolutions..
o If Uranus Motion effects on the moon orbital motion, the number 19 should
be seen in this effect data because it’s the rate between both orbits.
(Sub-Point 6-2)
o (2nd
Proof) Earth Motion Distance During Its Day Period = The Moon Total
Displacements During 29.53 solar days (The Moon Day Period) = Pluto
Motion Distance During 153.3 hours (Pluto Day Period) – this feature of
motion is created by Uranus motion effect on the 3 planets.
(Sub-Point 6-3)
o (3rd
Proof) Uranus Moves During (1440 Of Its Days Period) A Distance =
The Earth Moon Total Displacements During Metonic Cycle (6939.75 Solar
Days)
(Point No.7 "Uranus Motion Analysis")

I do this research
2nd
44
6-2 Uranus Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion (1st
Proof)
In this figure
- The Red Ball Shows Earth
- The Yellow Ball shows The Earth Moon
- The Blue Ball shows Uranus
- (S) is the Sun
- The figure suggests that, a triangle contains these 3 planets together in their
revolutions around the sun
- Let's suppose the three planets, Earth, its moon and Uranus move in parallel to
each other in their revolutions around the sun, and to save this parallelism between
them the figure provides a triangle contains these 3 planets -
Uranus orbital circumference = Earth orbital circumference x 19
In accurate calculations
- Uranus (18048 mkm) = Earth (940 mkm) x 19 (error 1%)
- means, While Earth revolves around the sun 19 times, Uranus revolves around the
sun 1 time only

I do this research
2nd
45
- If the 3 planets move in parallel to each other, that means, Uranus will divide its
revolution trajectory around the sun into 19 parts, and each part will be equivalent
to Earth orbital circumference (difference 1%)
- Uranus motion trajectory reflected on the moon motion trajectory (hypothesis),
let's imagine how that happens…
- The moon moves through its orbital circumference revolving around the Earth
(while the masses gravity forces imprison the moon inside the range from perigee
(0.363 mkm) to apogee (0.406 mkm) and prevents the moon to move out of this
motion range).
- But
- Uranus motion effects on the Earth moon motion (inside its prison) and forces the
moon to change its motion trajectory through 19 years. Because of that the moon
doesn't move through the same point 2 times during 19 years (6939.75 solar days),
that creates Metonic Cycle, that happens because the moon motion reflects Uranus
Motion Effect revolving around the sun, where Uranus moves on a trajectory
doesn't pass through the same point 2 times during (19 years) (according to the
moon time) reflecting on that the moon moves through its orbital circumference
doesn't pass through the same point 2 times during 19 sidereal years.
Shortly
- Metonic Cycle Is Created By Uranus Motion Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion.

I do this research
2nd
46
6-3 The 4 Planets Motions Interaction (2nd
Proof)
(We us a discussion of the moon orbit design – Point no. 4-3)
Earth motion distance during its day period = the moon displacements total
during its day period = Pluto motion distance during its day period (Error 1%)
6-3-1 The 4 Planets Motions Interaction Analysis
I - Data
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
II - Data Analysis
(4) – (1) = 189.124 mkm
(4) – (2) = 47.879 mkm
(4) – (3) = 14.171 mkm
(3) – (1) = 174.953 mkm
(3) – (2) = 33.708 mkm
(2) – (1) = 141.245 mkm
- Sin (17.2) x 47.879 mkm = 14.171 mkm
- Tan (10.96) x 174.953 mkm = 33.708 mkm
- Tan (13.3) x 141.245 mkm = 33.708 mkm (error 1%)
- 0.8 x 174.953 mkm = 141.245 mkm (error 1%)
o 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination.
o 17.2 degrees = Pluto Orbital Inclination
o 13.3 degrees = The angle of (E) in the moon orbital inclination
o 10.96 degrees (Cos 10.96 degrees x 88000 km = 86400 km)

I do this research
2nd
47
III –Discussion
- The previous 4 angles are the basics data for their planets, let's try to show that
o 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination
o 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt) x 0.8 = 97.8 deg (Uranus Axial Tilt)
o Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 degrees = 0.99 x 17.4 deg (The inner planets
orbital inclinations total) … also
o Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg x 7.1 = 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt)
o 13.3 degrees is the angle of point (E) (Earth) in the moon orbital triangle
(Earth Orb. Period 365.25 d = The moon Orb. Period 27.3 d x 13.3)
o The angle 10.96 degrees is used to define the moon orbital apogee radius
(r= 0.406 mkm) because (86400 km x 29.53 days = 2π x0.406 mkm). The
apogee orbit doesn't permits for a daily displacement greater than 86400 km,
where (Cos 10.96 degrees x 88000 km = 86400 km).
There's an interaction occurred here between these 4 planets (Uranus, Pluto, Earth and
its moon), and in this interaction, these 4 basic values are created and based on these 4
values many other data of these planets is created … means, this interaction forms the
geometrical structure of these planets motions …. And if we limited our discussion
for the moon orbit structure, that lead us to conclude that, the moon orbit geometrical
structure is effected by these 4 planets motions interaction as seen in the data.
i.e.
These 4 planets motions interaction effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to
create Metonic Cycle.
That supports the hypothesis (Metonic Cycle is a proof of Uranus motion effect on the
moon motion.)

I do this research
2nd
48
6-3-2 The Interaction Angle 71.9 Degrees
I- Data
1- The Moon Orbital Circumference at apogee radius = 2550973 km (100%)
2- Earth Daily Motion Distance = 2573483 km (101%)
3- Pluto moves during 153.3 hours =2593836 (102%)
4- The displacements 88000 km total during (29.53 days) = 2598693 km (102%)
5- Uranus motion distance (during 378675 seconds) = 2574990 km (101%)
5-1 = +24017 km
5-2 = +1507 km
5-3 = - 18846 km
5-4 = - 23703 km
4-1 = 42863 km
4-2 = 25210 km
4-3 = 5867 km
3-2 = 20353 km
3-1 = 41853 km
2-1 = 22510 km
II- Data Analysis
(I)
Cos (71.9) x 18846 km = 5867 km
Sin (71.9) x 23703 km = 22510 km And (Cos (71.9) = tan (17.25))
- The angle (71.9 degrees) I call (The Interaction Angle)
- This angle connects 5 basic values which are:
o 17.2 deg (Pluto orbital inclination)
o - 18846 km = the difference (Uranus motion & Pluto motion)
o – 23703 km = the difference (the moon displacements & Uranus motion)
o 22510 km = the difference (the moon orbit & Earth motion)
o 5867 km = the difference (the moon displacements & Pluto motion).

I do this research
2nd
49
- It's a clear interaction between the 4 planets motions, because it's directed data….
This data is not random but directed, because of that the same angle (71.9 degrees)
is used frequently Because It's Found In The Interaction Point.
(II)
2 x 71.9 degrees = 12.195 degrees x 11.8 degrees
Where
12.195 degrees = The moon motion angle (13.177 deg – 0.98562 deg)
11.8 degrees =6.7 degrees (moon axial tilt) + 5.1 deg (moon orbital inclination)
Why does the data use double values (2 x 71.9 deg)??
(III)
122.5 = 71.9 degrees x 1.7
Where
122.5 degrees = Pluto Axial Tilt
1.7 degrees = The moon motion equation constant ((θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- Why does the equation use 1.7 degrees for moon motion daily? (this question is
asked in the moon motion equation discussion), the data tells that the angle 71.9
degrees (the interaction angle) has an effect to do that
- So, the constant (1.7 deg) depends on the interaction angle (71.9 deg) and Pluto
Axial Tilt (122.5 deg)…
BUT
- (122.5 deg -71.9 deg) x 2 = 101.2 degrees
- In the distances data Earth motion distance daily (2573483 km) is considered as
(101%), If there's a relationship between this 101% and the value 101 deg, we may
conclude, this value also refers to the using of (2 x 71.9 degrees)! Why?
ALSO
- 71.9 degrees / 101.2 = 0.712 we remember θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees where 1.7 deg =
0.98562 deg +0.712 deg, it's another proof that, the constant (1.7 deg) is produced
by the planets interaction (specifically between Pluto and the moon motion).

I do this research
2nd
50
(IV)
- 14 degrees x 5.1 degrees (the moon orbital inclination) =71.4 degrees
- 71.9 degrees = 71.4 degrees + 0.5 degree (the moon angular diameter)
- And
- 14 degrees = (5.1 degrees (the moon orbital inclination) + 8.9 degrees)
Let's remember 8.9 degrees
o 95.6 deg + 1.1 deg = 96.7 deg
o 96.7 deg + 1.1 deg = 97.8 deg
o 97.8 deg + 1.1 deg = 98.9 deg
o (Please review page no. 36)
Where
o 95.6 deg = 90 deg + 0.5 degrees + 5.1 deg (The Moon orbital inclination)
o 96.7 deg = 90 deg + 6.7 deg (The Moon Axial Tilt)
o 97.8 deg = Uranus Axial Tilt
o 96.7 deg = 90 degrees + 8.9 degrees
o 1.1 deg = the angle of the moon triangle base (EA) & moon equator line.
(V)
- 63.7 degrees = (71.9 deg – 8.9 deg) + (71.9 deg – 8 x 8.9 deg)
- Where
- 63.7 deg = The Sun Declination
- Equation no. (V) tells a very important information, which are:
o (1) The interaction angle (71.9 deg) is used in double Value (2 x 71.9),
because of a geometrical necessity.
o (2) The (8 days) Cycle, we have discovered in Jupiter & Uranus motions, is
used here to define the interaction angle based on which the most of the
moon data is created – i.e. the cycle (8 days) effects on the moon motion
- The cycle (8 days) is discussed with many details in Point No. (7) (Uranus Motion
Analysis).

I do this research
2nd
51
II- Data Analysis (Continued)
(VI)
Tan (29.53) x 18846 km = 23703 km
o - 18846 km = the difference (Uranus motion & Pluto motion)
o – 23703 km = the difference (the moon displacements & Uranus motion)
- We have found the moon day period (29.53 days), it's created as an angle (29.53
degrees) in this same interaction ….
- The moon orbit regresses 19 degrees per year and causes to change the eclipse
calendar by 19 days by this regression , showing that, 1 degree = 1 day
- By this data we can explain some other important data, let's remember them
Old Data
Tan (12.195 deg) x 708.7 hours (the moon day period) = 153.3 h (Pluto day period)
Tan (13.177 deg) x 655.7 h. (the moon rotation period) = 153.3 h (Pluto day period)
- We have discussed this data with our discussion for the question (Why the moon
day period = 29.53 solar days?) (Point 4-5) (Page no. 42).
- This old data told us, the moon day =29.53 solar days because the moon an Pluto
days are created relative to each other (depends on the angle 12.195), and here we
catch the interaction point on which these 2 days periods are created relative to
each other…
- Where
- 29.53 degrees x 12.195 = 360 degrees.

I do this research
2nd
52
(VII)
(42863/25210) =1.7 (The constant =1.7 deg)
(42863/5867) =7.25 (an angle in the moon triangle its dimension =10921 km)
(42863/22510) = 1.9 (Mars Orbital Inclination = 1.9 deg)
- The distance 42863 km should get our attention because many of the moon data
depends on it
o 42863 km= (the moon displacements total) – (the moon orbit circumference)
o We should consider this relationship as deep as possible because it may
answer the question, Why the moon apogee orbit circumference=2.55 mkm?
This is the question we need to answer… because the moon apogee orbit
circumference is smaller than the moon displacements total during 29.53
days which equal (2598693 km) where the apogee orbit (2550973 km) and
the difference between them is 42863 km BUT the distance from perigee to
apogee =43000 km…… So, let's ask, Is the difference between the moon
displacements total and its apogee orbital circumference is found to create
the distance 43000 km (perigee apogee distance)?
o Shortly
o Is this difference found for the geometrical necessity required to create the
distance between perigee and apogee?
- The previous interaction effects clearly on the interacting planets data, let's see the
proportionality in Earth and Pluto Data to prove this claim.
Earth and Pluto Data
1- (Pluto day period / Earth day period) = (Earth velocity / Pluto velocity)
2- Pluto orbital distance 5906 mkm= Earth orbital Circumference 940 mkm x 2π
3- Pluto orbital period 90560 solar days= 1461 solar days x 2π3

I do this research
2nd
53
4- Pluto moves during 365.25 solar days a distance = 149.6 mkm = Earth orbital
distance.
5- Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg = 99% the inner planets orbital inclinations
total (17.4 deg)
6- Earth Axial Tilt 23.4 deg= 99% the outer planets orbital inclinations total (23.6
deg)
Notice
- The Interaction Angle Data is so rich data but we can't extend our discussion here,
because we need before to analyze Uranus motion, for that reason, we have to
complete this discussion with the Point no. (7) (Uranus Motion Analysis) under the
same title ("The Interaction Angle 71.9 degrees" Continued)

I do this research
2nd
54
7- Uranus Motion Analysis
7-2 Uranus Motion During 8 Pluto Days period
7-4 The Interaction angle 71.9 degrees (continued)
(3rd
Proof)
Uranus Moves During (1440 Of Its Days Period) A Distance = The Earth Moon
Total Displacements During Metonic Cycle (6939.75 Solar Days)
I-Data
- Uranus has a cycle with (144 of its days), Where
- Uranus 144 days = 2476.8 hours
- Pluto 16 days = 2452.8 hours
- The difference = 1 Solar Day
- This cycle we should discuss later in details …. Now we try to know if this cycle
effect on the moon motion….
- Uranus moves during 1440 of its days (1440 x 17.2 h = 24768 hours), during this
period Uranus moves a distance = 606.3 mkm
- The Earth moon moves per a solar day a displacement =88000 km,
- During 6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle), the moon moves a distance = 610.7 mkm
And
- Uranus diameter 51118 km x (1092
) = 607.3 mkm
II- Discussion
- The values (606.3 mkm and 610.7 mkm) are different with around (1%)
- The data tells that, the distance Uranus moves during its cycle (1440 Uranus days)
= the moon displacements total during Metonic Cycle, which shows that both
values are related to each other.

I do this research
2nd
55
- For more confirmation, Uranus gives us the value (607.3 mkm) as a result of the
equation (51118 km x 1092
), where we remember this equation because
o Mercury orbital distance (57.9 mkm) = Mercury diameter x 1092
o Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) = Earth diameter x 1092
o Saturn orbital distance (1433.5 mkm) = Saturn diameter x 1092
- By this same equation Uranus produces the result 607 mkm = the moon total
displacement during Metonic Cycle = Uranus motion distance during 1440 its days
- The data shows, the moon motion is effected by Uranus Motion, Supporting the
hypothesis, (Metonic Cycle is created by Uranus Effect on the moon motion)
Notice
- During (1440 days of Uranus days period) Uranus moves a distance = 606.3 mkm
- 1440 days x 17.2 hours = 24768 hours = 1032 solar days
- The Moon total displacement during (6939.75 solar days) = 610.7 mkm
- i.e.
- Equal distances (error 1%) are passed in 2 different periods of time
o (6939.75 solar days / 1032 solar days) =6.724
o But
o 6.7 degrees = The Moon Axial Tilt (error 0.3%)
o We may remember that, a deep relationship is found between Uranus axial
tilt and the moon axial tilt (97.8 degrees – 6.7 degree = 91.1 degree).
Shortly
Uranus motion effects on the Earth moon motion and forces the moon to move
Metonic Cycle during 19 years

I do this research
2nd
56
7-2 Uranus Motion During 8 Pluto Days Period
- Why do we need to remember Uranus 144 days Cycle? We have 2 reasons
o (1st
) Because Uranus moves during 1440 Uranus days (17.2 h) a distance =
The Moon Total Displacements During Metonic Cycle
o (2nd
) Because Uranus & Pluto Motions interaction can be seen clearly in
studying Uranus 144 days Cycle….
- How Uranus Motion Cycle (During 8 Pluto Days) Is Discovered?
o Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during its day period (9.9 h) a distance = Jupiter
circumference (449197 km) + 17695 km
o During 8 of Jupiter days periods (9.9 x 8 =79.2 h), Jupiter moves a distance
= 8 Jupiter circumferences + Jupiter diameter (error 1%)
o Because of Jupiter diameter I concluded that, Jupiter has a cycle in 8 days
Then
o Jupiter motion distance during 8 of its days (79.2 h) which = 3735072 km,
this same distance = Saturn motion distance during 10 of Saturn days period
o Means, Saturn moves during 10 of its days a distance = 3735072 km,
o I have concluded that, Jupiter motion energy is transported to Saturn motion
energy by the rate 80% Because of that I expected that, Saturn should
transport its motion energy to Uranus by the same 80% (but it's incorrect!)
o Saturn transported the motion energy with this rate 80% to Neptune and that
means the distance Saturn passes during 8 of Saturn days period, Neptune
passes during 10 days of Neptune days period (error 5%)
The question is why Saturn doesn't transport the motion energy to Uranus?!
- A surprise was in our waiting…
- Uranus (6.8 km/sec) moves during Pluto day period (153.3 h) a distance = Jupiter
motion distance during 8 of its days period (79.2 h) + 17695 km
- That means, during 8 Pluto days period (153.3 h x 8) Uranus moves a distance =
Jupiter motion distance during 64 Jupiter days (64x 9.9 h) +Jupiter diameter (1%)

I do this research
2nd
57
- It's very similar to Jupiter 8 days Cycle ….
- Easily we have concluded that, Uranus motion creates a cycle of Pluto 8 days
where Uranus moves during this period a distance = Jupiter motion distance during
64 Jupiter days
- Because Jupiter motion energy is transported to Saturn and from Saturn to Neptune
the distance should be equal for all these planets – by that – the chance if found to
compare between these motions distances - let's write them in following
I- Data
1. Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 8 days of Pluto days period (1226.4 hours) a
distance = (4415040 seconds x 6.8 km/s) = 30.022272 million km
2. Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 64 days of Jupiter days period (64 x9.9 h =
633.6 hours) a distance = (2280960 seconds x 13.1 km/s) = 29.880576 million km
3. Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 80 days of Saturn days period (80 x10.7 h = 856
hours) a distance = (3081600 seconds x 9.7 km/s) = 29.891520 million km
4. Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 100 days of Neptune days period (100 x16.1 h =
1610 hours) a distance = (5796000 seconds x 5.4 km/s) = 31.298400 million km
5. Jupiter Circumference (449197 km) x 64 = 28.748639 million km
6. Saturn Circumference (378675 km) x 80 = 30.294001 million km
7. Neptune Circumference x 2 (311193.6 km) x 100 = 31.119360 million km
II-Data Analysis
- Let's remember these cycles in following:
- Jupiter moves during its day period (9.9 h) a distance = 466884 km but Jupiter
circumference = 449197 km, the difference = 17687 km
- During 8 of Jupiter days period, Jupiter moves distance = 3735072 km = 8 Jupiter
circumferences + 1 Jupiter diameter (142984 km =8x 17687 km) (error 1%)
- Based on that I have concluded, Jupiter has a cycle in 8 of its days (79.2 hours)
- By this analysis Jupiter 8 days Cycle is discovered
Then

I do this research
2nd
58
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during (1 Pluto day period =153.3 hours) a distance =
3752784 km, this value is very near to 3735072 km (Jupiter motion during 8 days)
- But 3752784 km - 3735072 km = 17687 km
- That means, during 8 days of Pluto days period (153.3 h x 8 = 1226.4 hours), this
difference will be = 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) (17687 km x 8)
- By this analysis also, Pluto 8 days cycle is discovered…. We should note that,
Jupiter uses its day period but Uranus uses Pluto day period, so Pluto 8 days cycle
is found by Uranus motion…
- This analysis tells that, 8 days of Pluto days period is a cycle contains 8 cycles of
Jupiter cycle and each cycle is consisted of 8 Jupiter days period, for that reason I
use Jupiter motion distance during 64 Jupiter days as seen in data No (2)
- There's one more noticeable observation, that, Jupiter motion distance during 8 of
Jupiter days period = Saturn motion distance during 10 of Saturn days period, by
this notice I have concluded that, Jupiter motion energy is transported from Jupiter
to Saturn based on a rate 80%
- So, I have supposed that, this is the way by which the motion is transported from a
planet to another, so the motion energy of Jupiter is transported to Saturn with this
rate 80%, based on this supposition, I have supposed that, Saturn motion energy
will be transported to Neptune with this same rate 80%
- For that reason, the distance during 64 of Jupiter days period should be equal the
distance Saturn passed during 80 of its days period (I provided this in data No. 3)
- And based on that, Saturn motion distance during 80 of its days should be equal
Neptune motion distance during 100 of its days period (provided in Data No. 4)
- I have supposed that, a planet circumference is a player effect on this planet
motion produced cycles, I have provided 64 of Jupiter circumferences in Data No.
5 and also provided 80 Saturn Circumferences in data No.6 and then 200 of
Neptune Circumferences in Data No.7 (Neptune moves during its day period a
distance = 2 Neptune Circumference)

I do this research
2nd
59
III-Discussion
(1st
Point)
- Uranus motion distance during 8 of Pluto days period (30.022272 mkm) – Jupiter
motion distance during 64 of Jupiter days period (29.880576 mkm) = 142984 km
(= Jupiter diameter) (error 1%)
o Because of Jupiter diameter value, I have concluded that, Uranus & Jupiter
Creates a cycle by their motions interaction.. Where Uranus uses 8 of Pluto
days periods and Jupiter uses 64 of its days period.
(2nd
Point)
- Jupiter motion distance during 64 of its days period (29.880576 mkm) – the total
of 64 Jupiter Circumferences (28.748639 mkm) = 1.1318 m km
o Jupiter moves per a solar day a distance = 1.1318 m km
o That means, these 2 values express 2 motions interacted together to produce
this value (1.1318 m km) which is considered as a value defined based on
cycle period (a solar day) (this value will be analyzed more deep later)
(3rd
Point)
- Saturn motion distance during 80 of its days (=29.891520 mkm) – Jupiter motion
durance during 64 of its days period (= 29.880576 mkm) = 10921 km
o 10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference
o The 2 values are considered to be equal, and its almost correct because the
difference between both = 0.036%
o But this very small error = the moon circumference
o Please Note 29891520 km = 10921 x 2737
o But 29880576 km = 10921 x 2736
o The difference between both values shows that, these motions are part of
great cycles and interactions –support the claim (new cycles are discovered)

I do this research
2nd
60
(4th
Point)
- Neptune motion distance during 100 of Neptune days periods (=31298400 km) –
Saturn motion distance during 80 of Saturn days periods (=29891520 km) =
1406880 km ………. But
o 1406880 km = The Sun Diameter 139200 km (Error 1%)
o The Sun Diameter 139200 km = 49528 km Neptune diameter x 28.1
o Neptune Axial Tilt =28.3 degrees
(5th
Point)
- Neptune motion distance during 100 of Neptune days periods (=31.298400 mkm)
– Uranus motion distance during 8 of Pluto days periods (=30.022272 mkm) =
1.276128 mkm = π x 406000 km
o Earth Moon Distance at apogee radius = 406000 km, where this is the most
far point the moon can reach from Earth.

I do this research
2nd
61
- 144 days of Uranus days periods = 144 x 17.2 hours = 2476.8 hours
- 16 days of Pluto days period = 16 x 153.3 hours = 2452.8 hours
- The Difference = 24 hours = 1 Solar Day
- The data shows these are 3 values (144 Uranus days, 16 Pluto days and the solar
day) they are 3 cycles
- We have seen that before
o 6939.75 solar days = Metonic Cycle
o 6585.36 solar days = Saros Cycle
o 354.39 solar days = The lunar year
And
- The data shows that, there's an interaction of Uranus, Pluto and Earth motions
- This data we have discussed before and reach to the following conclusions
o Uranus motion effect on Pluto motion causes Pluto day period to be =153.3
hours where it's so long day period in comparison with the other outer
planets
o This effect is found because Pluto moves during (6939.75 x 153.3 hours) a
distance = Uranus orbital circumference
o This data also we have discussed before

I do this research
2nd
62
Uranus & Pluto Motions Interaction
I- Data
(a)
4.7 km / sec x 10921 seconds = 51118 km (Uranus diameter) (error 0.4%)
(b)
4.7 km / sec x 51118 seconds = 2 x 120536 (Saturn Diameter) (error 0.4%)
(c)
4.7 km / sec x 2 x 120536 (Saturn Diameter) =1.1318 mkm (Jupiter daily velocity)
II- Discussion
- The data shows that, the results are created as different values in the cycles of 8
Pluto days cycle and the other planets equal distances
- That tells, these cycles are created by an effect of Pluto motion during different
periods of time
- That shows an effect of Pluto motion more extending than our expectation for its
effect on the solar system motion…
More Data shows Uranus and Pluto Motions Interactions
Equation No. (d)
90560 days = 13.177 x 0.99 x 6939.75 days
- 90560 solar days = Pluto Orbital Period
- Equation (d) shows, Pluto orbital period depends on Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days)
- and on the value 13.177, where the moon moves per solar day 13.177 degrees
Equation No. (e)
Pluto during 6939.75 days moves a distance = 2815 mkm
- The data tells that, Pluto uses also Metonic Cycle (6939.75 solar days) and moves
during this period a distance = Mercury Uranus Distance
Equation No. (f)
21.8 x 0.8 degrees (Uranus orbital inclination) = 17.4 degrees
21.8 = Jupiter Mass / Uranus Mass

I do this research
2nd
63
7-4 The Interaction Angle 71.9 Degrees
We complete the discussion in (6-3-2) (Metonic Cycle Discussion).
I- Data
1- The Moon Orbital Circumference at apogee radius = 2550973 km (100%)
2- Earth Daily Motion Distance = 2573483 km (101%)
3- Pluto moves during 153.3 hours =2593836 (102%)
4- The displacements 88000 km total during (29.53 days) = 2598693 km (102%)
5- Uranus motion distance (during 378675 seconds) = 2574990 km (101%)
5-1 = +24017 km
5-2 = +1507 km
5-3 = - 18846 km
5-4 = - 23703 km
4-1 = 42863 km
4-2 = 25210 km
4-3 = 5867 km
3-2 = 20353 km
3-1 = 41853 km
2-1 = 22510 km
II- Data Analysis
- This data is analyzed in point (6-3-2), we use this data here again for a new point.
- We will add Uranus motion distance differences together as following:
- The total will be = (5-1) + (5-2) +(5-3) +(5-4) = -17025 km
- What does this value (-17025 km) means?!
- It's Uranus effect on the 3 Planets (Earth, its moon and Pluto), Why?
- Because these 3 planets move during their cycles periods a distances = Uranus
orbital circumference as we have discussed in that point (6-3-2), because their
(Metonic) Cycles depends on their motions distances which equal Uranus Orbital

I do this research
2nd
64
Circumference, that shows Uranus effect on these 3 planets, where their motions
are interacted because of that.
- For that reason, the distance (-17025 km) should show Uranus effect on these 3
planets!!
- What's This Distance (-17025 km)?!
- 17025 km x 2 = 34309 = π x 10921 km (the moon Circumference). (Error 0.7)
More Data
(a)
5040 sec. x 6.8 km /s (Uranus velocity) = 34309 km (= 10921 km x π)
(b)
34309 sec x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) = 449197 km = Jupiter Circumference
(c)
34309 sec x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) = 160592 km = Uranus Circumference
(d)
34309 sec x 27.78 km/s (the moon velocity) = 943817 km
(943817 km = the perimeter of the moon orbital triangle ACE) (error 1%)
(e)
10921 sec x 35 km/s (Venus velocity) = 120536 km (Saturn diameter) (error 1%)
(f)
10921 sec x 29.8 km/s (Earth velocity)=321183 km (2 Uranus Circumferences) (1.3%)
(g)
1153 sec x 29.8 km/s (Earth velocity)= 34309 km = 5040 sec. x 6.8 km /s
III- Discussion
- The data shows clearly that the value (34309) is used widely in the solar planets
motions data, showing that there's a deep effect practiced from this interaction on
almost all solar planet… but why the used value is a double value?
- We have found that before, the angle 71.9 degrees is used by its double value!!

I do this research
2nd
65
- Let's remember that in following….
(a)
2 x 71.9 degrees = 12.195 degrees x 11.8 degrees
Where
12.195 degrees = The moon motion angle (13.177 deg – 0.98562 deg)
11.8 degrees =6.7 degrees (moon axial tilt) + 5.1 deg (moon orbital inclination)
Why does the data use double values (2 x 71.9 deg)??
(b)
(122.5 deg -71.9 deg) x 2 = 101.2 degrees
Where
122.5 degrees = Pluto Axial Tilt
(c)
63.7 degrees = (71.9 deg – 8.9 deg) + (71.9 deg – 8 x 8.9 deg)
It's usual using of the double value, Why?! because
(Old Data)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Data Analysis
The period (6939.75) x (29.53 solar days) of the moon = 204931 days = 561.07 years
But
30589 days (Uranus Orbital period) = 27.3 days (the moon orbital days) x 1120
561.07 years x 2 = 1123

I do this research
2nd
66
- 2 moon Cycles are required to produce the rate (1123) which is very near to the
rate between both cycles (1120)… these (1123) and (1120) aren't 2 random
number found by chance, these are 2 geometrical values are produced by one
machine depends on the planets motions as motions of gears, for that reason,
double Cycle is required, and the moon data will show its cycle (561 years) but
many other planets motions will deal with the double cycle (1123 years), this also
we have seen in the angle 12.195 degrees analysis where the triangle hypotenuse
was = 2 x 29.53 km, and the value 29.53 solar days is the moon day period, but the
value 59 days is used more widely, for that, the Earth moves during 59 days a
distance = its orbital distance.
(The angle 12.195 analysis is in the moon orbit geometrical design)

I do this research
2nd
67
I-Data
- In this figure I cut layers from the moon diameter to create
smaller moon diameters
- he Blue Circle its diameter R1= 695 km and r1 =347.5 km
- The Red Circle its diameter R2= 1390 km and r2 =695 km
- The Black Circle its diameter R3= 2085 km and r3 =1042.5 km
- The Brown Circle its diameter R4= 2780 km and r4 =1390 km
- The Orange Circle its diameter R5= 3208 km r5 = 1604 km = (5040/π)
- The moon diameter R6= 3475 km r6 = 1737.5 km
II- Data Analysis
- Let's suppose that, (the moon diameter is created as a difference between 88000
km and 86400 km = 1600 km)
- Why this hypothesis is logical? Because the moon orbit apogee circumference
(2.55 mkm) is sufficient for a daily displacement =86400 km, as we discussed
before, 86400 km x 29.53 days = 2.55 mkm
- But the actual moon displacement =88000 km
- The difference =1600 km
- Where 5040 km = π x 1604 km
- Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days,
- To use 1 km equivalent to 1 second as a using found frequently…
- (for example, The moon day period =29.53 solar days =2.55 million seconds and
the moon orbital apogee circumference =2.55 mkm "Zero error")
- The data provides an interaction between (distance & time period) values showing
that, their interaction (may) cause the matter creation and define its dimensions,

I do this research
2nd
68
based on that I suppose the moon diameter may be created based on this difference
between the 2 values (1600 = 88000 km – 86400 km)
- Where the value 86400 km is (in fact) a solar day (86400 seconds) which is used
here as a distance for a geometrical necessity, because the moon apogee orbital
Circumference = 86400 km x 29.53 days, i.e. the value 86400 is created depends
on the moon day period and the moon apogee orbital circumference, because the
facts tell that, the moon can't move beyond apogee radius (r=406000 km) so we
have to suppose that the value 86400 is a distance 86400 km.
- Now we have 2 points to analysis in this investigation…(1st
point) to analyze how
the period of time can be used as a distance (2nd
) to define the reason for which the
moon diameter is cut in these 5 parts (5 smaller diameters), let's do that in
following…

The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised)

The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised)

Similar to The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised) (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Moon Orbital Motion More Analysis (II) (Revised)