Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics &
Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis and
Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN
University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 10th
May 2020
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't
effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own
data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc)
this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation
otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon
diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024
kg
also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from
6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to
that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This
question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon
Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a
method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision

I do this research
2nd
2
1- Methodology
I use planets data analysis to discover solar planets origin - so question as "why the
Earth moon diameter=3475 km? is a usual question in my study….…..
But
I try to extend the data to find some answer for such question…. For example
Such equation gives feeling that, the moon diameter is created relative to some other
data – which may provide a new approach to understand the solar system creation
The next question should be "Can any planet effect on any other planet creation?"
- The current vision tells that the solar system is created by the big bang theory
– where the creation is done based on some random process and no geometrical
reasons can be found behind any planet data because the planets were created
by random process (no planned geometrically) ….
- My Vision- I suppose that- the planets were created as one building and each
planet is a part of this building – means- each planet was created depending on
the other planets – i.e. – there's some geometrical plan behind the creation – the
planets aren't separated points from each other – on the contrary the planets and
their distances (together) play geometrically to produce one general geometrical
structure – based on we can answer - why the diameters rate = the distances rate
because? Because the matter and space were created together complementary
- The next step – is the proof – we have 2 visions what's the correct one? how to
prove? Have we a geometrical mechanism explains why the diameters rate =
the distances rate? NO!
- The Data Direction – our weaken point is seen already – no geometrical
mechanism means we don't know how that happened and so the respectful
reader has the option to claim that – the equation is found by pure coincidence
and (My Vision) is incorrect! Any help!
- Planets Data Direction –means– I wish to show that – the planets available
data refer to One Specific Direction – let's use an example – we know the
planet moves by masses gravity – and the planet orbital distance is defined
based on the gravity concept – ok – let's see the Data Direction –
1. Jupiter is the greatest mass why not the nearest planet to the sun?
2. The order " Mercury – Venus – Earth" tells "greater mass needs greater
orbital distance (against the gravitation equation")
3. Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus but Uranus is nearer to the sun!
400
radiusEarth
(apogee)ncecircumfereorbitalMoonThe
distancemoonEarth
distanceorbtialEarth
diametermoonthe
diametersunthe
===

I do this research
2nd
3
4. the outer massive planets masses order (4 plants) causes an order for
their day periods!
The Data Direction – means – the data leads to "A conclusion" regardless its
mechanism – in my example – I don't know the mechanism by which the planets were
ordered– but no claim that the planets order is done based on the masses gravity – the
data direction disproves the concept – still the concept can be real – but the planets
order doesn't follow it
Let's uses another example
We know the planets were created by the big bang they – let's analyze it
- Earth Circumference = The (5) Inner Planets Diameters Total
- Jupiter diameter = (8) planets diameters total
- The solar planets diameters total = 2 Jupiter diameters +1 Saturn diameter
- 2 Neptune Circumference = the other outer planets diameters total
The data leads to the conclusion that – the planets diameters may be created based on
some geometrical rule – as we have seen in Bode law – the planets orbital distances
(except Neptune) are defined based on some sequence – also our data gives the
feeling that planets diameters were created based on (one) geometrical rule which
makes their data relative to each other – may an objection is raised that– the data is
found by pure coincidences –may be – but because the data is so many the tendency
toward the geometrical rule is greater
Any way we analyze the data together, with hope to see the clear logical conclusion at
end – we try to read what's written in the nature book where we have nothing else to
read.

I do this research
2nd
4
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
2-1 Preface
2-2 Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
2-3 Jupiter effect on the inner planets
2-1 Preface
Earth orbital period (365.25 days) = (the moon orbital period 27.3 days) x (3.66)2
Where (3.66 = Earth diameter / the moon diameter)
Can the previous equation support the idea, "Earth effects on its moon orbital period?"
What's the relationship between the planet diameter and its orbital period? Means if
the moon diameter is changed, does that necessitate to change its orbital period?
Otherwise the previous equation is found by "Pure Coincidence Only"
Let's start from a logical question-
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and its orbital period?!
We have no geometrical mechanism! That means – If such relationship is found – we
simply don't know how it works!
So such equation can be a qualified proof for such heavy claim?!
What should we do here? to remove the data without understanding or to conclude
any a superficial conclusion gives to truth?! What should we do?
The outer planets diameters total = 153.3 x Pluto Diameter
(Pluto rotation period = 153.3 hours) what's the relationship between these values?
A Superficial or A Complex Vision
- A light beam with a velocity (0.3mkm/sec) travels during a solar day (86400
seconds) a distance = 25920 mkm
But
- The planets motions distances total during a solar day a distance =17.75 mkm
and that means – during 1461 days, the planets pass a distance =25920 mkm
So
- The distance 25920 mkm is passed 2 times (once by light beam) and once by
the planets motions total – the same distance is passed but with 2 different rates
of time
But
- We see the value as 25920 years (the Precession Cycle)! Why?
Because
- It's a light motion – and we know that (x=tc) when c=1 so the (x=t) and that
means what's a distance value relative to the light (observer) we may see it as a
time value –
I want to say that
- The naïve vision my cover one very complex vision – so we don't need to
dicide to accept or refuse any idea before to analyze it as deep as possible

I do this research
2nd
5
2-2 Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
I-Data
(1)
Jupiter Circumference x the Moon Circumference = Jupiter orbital Circumference
(the sun diameter x the moon diameter = Jupiter orbital Circumference)
(2)
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 329.8 days x (13.1)
(13.1 = Jupiter Diameter /the moon circumference)
(3)
(29.2 days /2.23 days) =13.1
(4)
2 x 4331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) = 25 x 346.6 days (the nodal year)
(5)
6.7 degrees (the moon axial tilt)/ 5.1 (the moon orbital inclination) =1.3 (error 1%)
(1.3 degrees = Jupiter orbital inclination)
(6)
Jupiter Mass /The Moon mass = 25920
(7)
(The moon rotation period / Jupiter rotation period) x π2
= (1461/2.23)
(1461 days = Earth Cycle 365+365+365+366 days)
(8)
Mars Effect
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 687 days (Mars orbital period) x 2π
But
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) x 25.2
(9)
The Earth Moon Orbital Triangle Analysis
Let's discuss each equation is a separated page in following:

I do this research
2nd
6
Equation No. (1)
Jupiter Circumference x the Moon Circumference = Jupiter orbital Circumference
(the sun diameter x the moon diameter = Jupiter orbital Circumference)
We have discussed this equation frequently- there's many interesting data here
(a)
The sun diameter = Jupiter diameter x π2
(Error 1.5%)
(b)
Jupiter Orbital Circumference= (The Earth Moon Diameter)2
x 400
I consider the claim "pure coincidence" as my basic difficulty to provide my vision –
we need a logical conclusion…
Why the sun diameter is created depending on Jupiter diameter? – I don't know! Or
how that's possible?!
Just the vision can be more clear if we add to this data the equation we have seen in
the methodology
I try to show that – some complex geometrical structure is found behind this equation
Simply –
Jupiter orbital circumference is created as a function of the Earth Moon Diameter!
How? Basically because the claim is that – Jupiter effects on the Earth moon creation
and not the Earth moon effects on Jupiter….Still we may consider the effect is mutual
Any way it's a complex geometrical effect if found really…
The discussion can be more clear if we have an answer for the question –
How the matter is created?
What does the big bang theory tell? the matter origin is a secret no one can reach?
Why Jupiter diameter =8 planets diameters total? No geometrical reason behind – it's
found by some pure coincidence..
I try to show that – there's a clear gab- between what the theory tells and what the data
tells – the theory clearly is insufficient! – it's not enough to have a great confidence in
what you say – more important – you should have some logic
All data shows planets data dependency on each other – so what power in my hand to
remove the data and conclude that the data is created independently from each other –
but the data disproves this independency and proves the creation dependency – even if
no geometrical mechanism we know yet – but no any data contradicts the conclusion
400
radiusEarth
(apogee)ncecircumfereorbitalMoonThe
distancemoonEarth
distanceorbtialEarth
diametermoonthe
diametersunthe
===

I do this research
2nd
7
Equation No. (2)
What is 329.8 days??
The Earth moon sidereal year =327.6 days – but if this year isn't finished with the
sidereal month (27.3 days) but finished with the synodic month (29.53 days) – so the
total period will be 329.8 days
So Equation No. 5 tells us
(Jupiter Orbital Period/ the Earth Moon Sidereal Year) = (Jupiter diameter / the
Earth Moon Circumference)
We have seen some similar equation before
(Earth orbital period/ the moon orbital period) = (earth diameter / the moon diameter)2
("the moon" means the Earth moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Again
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and its orbital period?
Still we don't know – why?
because we don't know …. How the matter is created?..... but
we have seen many data shows some rates between the planet diameter and its orbital
period – so if this relationship is found between the Earth and its Moon – so based on
that – this same relationship is found between Jupiter and The Earth moon because the
equation is so similar
Please Note
The rate 13.1 shows many puzzles data
(I)
Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec
(2)
The moon motion per solar day =13.18 degrees
And we have seen
(3)
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 13.1 x 329.8 days
We have a reason to doubt there's some geometrical system is related to this value
(13.1) – i.e. – there's some logic to suppose that this rate 13.1 can't be created by any
pure coincidence….!
The following equation may help us to see more deep as possible
(29.2 days /2.23 days) =13.1)

I do this research
2nd
8
Equation No. (3)
(29.2 days /2.23 days) =13.1
Let's remember these value
2.23 days
- (lunar synodic month 29.53 – lunar sidereal month 27.3 =2.23 days)
29.2
- Earth moves during a lunar synodic month =29.2 degrees
- The Earth moon moves during a lunar synodic month =29.2 degrees +360
- (2.58 mkm Earth motion distance per solar day = 29.2 x 88000 km (the moon
displacement for a solar day)
So
- The previous data tells that – the value (29.2 degrees) should be considered the
Gear by which both motion (the Earth and the Earth Moon motions) be in
consistency with Each other – so because of this value 29.2 degree the harmony
is found between these different motions – let's see this harmony in following
Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days = 19 Sidereal years (365.25days)
= 235 Synodic month (29.53 days)
=20 Nodal years (346.6 days)
Saros Cycle 6585.32 days = 223 Synodic month (29.53 days)
= 254 Sidereal Year (27.3 days)
=19 Nodal years (346.6 days)
- So – the motions of Earth – Earth Moon and the Moon orbit – all these 3
motions be in harmony with each other.
- This harmony – clearly – depends on the value -29.2 degrees
But
- The Earth moon orbit regresses yearly 19 degrees which causes change for the
eclipse calendar with 19 days means 1 degree =1 day -
Equation No. (3)
(29.2 days /2.23 days) =13.1
2.92 days is equivalent to the value 29.2 degrees – which is the main gear controls the
Earth and its motion motions harmony
Please note
2.23 days is a specific value because it controls 2 lunar months (means controls the
moon basic motions)
Equation No. 3 tells that – the harmony in Earth and the moon motion is created by
Jupiter effect on the moon data (the rate 13.1 again)
To remove such huge data claiming that- the data has no geometrical reason and
found by pure coincidence –such claim cause to loss a treasure of data …

I do this research
2nd
9
Equation No. (4)
2 x 4331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) = 25 x 346.6 days (the nodal year)
Equation No. (8)
Mars Effect
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 687 days (Mars orbital period) x 2π
But
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) x 25.2
687 days (Mars orbital period) =365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 1.9
(25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt) (1.9 degrees = Mars orbital inclination)
Also remember – please -
Equation No. (2)
Simply the periods are created depending on each other
Mars data may help to see one connection between the moon – mars and Jupiter
How this connection is found? It's not our question now – but we see the connection
is strong and clear between the 3 planets
It's hard to remove such great data claiming, the data is found by pure coincidence
without any geometrical reasons behind
Simply such conclusion contradicts the data which shows clearly its direction
The Data Direction supports the mutual effect between Jupiter and the Earth Moon
even through Mars

I do this research
2nd
10
Equation No. (6)
Jupiter Mass /The Moon mass = 25920
This equation we have discussed frequently before –it's interesting one – let's
remember the value 25920
- A light beam with a velocity (0.3mkm/sec) travels during a solar day (86400
seconds) a distance = 25920 mkm
But
- The planets motions distances total during a solar day a distance =17.75 mkm
and that means – during 1461 days, the planets pass a distance =25920 mkm
So
- The distance 25920 mkm is passed 2 times (once by light beam) and once by
the planets motions total – the same distance is passed but with 2 different rates
of time
But
- We see the value as 25920 years (the Precession Cycle)!
- The mutual effect between Jupiter and the Earth Moon is beyond the simple
vision toward the solar system…
- This mutual effect is created based on the light motion which is found behind
the planet motion (if it's true!) and this light motion causes the mutual effect
between Jupiter and the Earth Moon –it's the light motion behind the planet
motion-
- I wish I explain the situation as clear as possible – we have no power to remove
the data by claim "pure coincidence" basically because there's no coincidences
here – where the coincidences concept depends on the random choices – and
we have no random in the previous data – we didn't select any data – we simply
move with all Jupiter data and see that under this data (always) there's a
connection with the Earth moon – so the simple vision and pure coincidences
claim both are failed we have to adopt the complex vision and search for the
geometrical reasons based on which this data was created..
Equation No. (5)
6.7 degrees (the moon axial tilt)/ 5.1 (the moon orbital inclination) =1.3 (error 1%)
(1.3 degrees = Jupiter orbital inclination)
How 1.3 can be 1.3 degrees?! Because 1.3 x 1 degree = 1.3 degrees
We may remember that
Mercury original axial tilt was 1 degree and still work spite of its change because of
Jupiter.. (please Review Mars Migration Theory in the Point No. 3)

I do this research
2nd
11
Equation No. (7)
(The moon rotation period / Jupiter rotation period) x π2
= (1461/2.23)
(1461 days = Earth Cycle 365+365+365+366 days)
(2.23 days =29.53 days -27.3 days)
Equation No. (7) tells that – Jupiter and the Earth Moon rotation periods are defined
based on Earth Cycle (1461 days =365+365+365+366) and the moon months
difference
The value 2.23 days is used again – please remember
Equation No. (3)
(29.2 days /2.23 days) =13.1
I wish I provide a sufficient data to support the claim
- The solar system is not separated planets from each other – it's not true- the
solar system is one building and each planet is a part of it – look to your house
– the walls have equal height by pure coincidences!! NOT by geometrical
design – the walls floors and roves are created in proportionality to each other
why? it's one building and w need geometrical tools to enable the building
process
- The solar system is one great body (imagine some great creature) – so the
creature head should be in proportionality with its legs….etc
- Why we can't accept this idea? Because of
- The space definition – What's the space? How to create a distance? From what
stuff the space is created? Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2
) and the space is
created of energy (a hypothesis) – so the matter and space were created from
the same stuff and complementary to each other – So no space can be created
without matter

I do this research
2nd
12
Equation No. (9)
(6th
Data)
Figure No.1 (Note Please – FDBR is a square)
Figure shows the moon orbit around Earth with some details (my created figure)
Where…… AB= BC= 86000 km….. and BR=CR also AD=BD
EB =363000 km = Perigee radius (perigee is the nearest point, the moon can reach)
EC= 378000 km= Earth Moon Distance when the moon in total solar eclipse point
EG= 384000 km = The Moon Orbital Distance (registered in NASA Planetary sheet)
ED= 406000 km = Apogee radius (Apogee is the most far point, the moon can reach)
Let's review the data … we know AB= BC= 86000 km, and BR=CR =43000 km
(EB)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (EC)2
(error 1%)
(EC)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (EG)2
(error 0.5%)
(EG)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (S)2
(Where S= 394000 km- unknown point)
(S)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (ED)2
(error 0.7%)
(6th
Data) (2)
BG = 21000 km DG =22000 km
CG =88500 km CD = 96150 km
Triangle Angles
E Angle = 13.33 degrees C= 121.7 degrees
A Angle =45 degrees (ABC is an Equilateral triangle)
ECB Angle = 76.66 degrees BCA Angle = 45 degrees
BDC Angle =63.4 degrees ADC = 116.6 degrees
DCB Angle = 26.6 degrees GCB = 13.7 degrees
(6th
Data) (3)
In the previous triangle
AC = 120536 km = Saturn Diameter
EC = 378000 km = Saturn Circumference
AE= 449378.3 km = Jupiter Circumference

I do this research
2nd
13
More Data
(1)
2 Jupiter Circumferences - 2 Saturn Circumferences = 1 Jupiter Diameter (error 1.3%)
(2)
(Jupiter Diameter)2
+ (Saturn Diameter)2
= (0.5 Saturn Circumference)2
(1.2%)
(3)
2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total (No Error)
(4)
Saturn Diameter – Jupiter Radius = Neptune Diameter x 0.99 (No Error)
Table No. 1 Why Earth Circumference = 40080 km?
If Earth diameter = 12756 km, is considered to be = 1
Earth Circumference = 40080 km, will be just =Π So….. The Following Vales Are
Correct
Error
Earth Circumference =Π -
Solar Inner Planets Diameters Total =Π -
Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total =9Π -
Moon Orbit Radius (At Perigee Point) =9Π -
All Solar Planets Diameters Total =10Π 1%
Moon Orbit Radius (At Apogee Point) =10Π 1.2%
2 Jupiter Diameter + Saturn Diameter =10Π
Moon Orbit Radius (At Total Solar eclipse Point) =9.5Π -
Saturn Circumference =9.5Π -
Notice (1)
- If the moon be fixed on the perigee radius (0.363 mkm) so the moon diameter
addition (0.3665 mkm) = the outer planets diameters total without error where
the rest distance to apogee radius will be 40000 km = the inner planets
diameters total = Earth Circumference without Error!
Notice (2)
- The outer planets diameters total (0.3665 mkm) / the moon diameter 3475 km =
(the moon rotation period / 2π(x1 hour))
Notice (3)
- The outer planets diameters total (0.3665 mkm) / Pluto diameter 2390 km =
Pluto rotation period / (hour)
Where
(Discussion)
- The Earth Moon orbital Triangle is created depends on Jupiter & Saturn Data as
we see clearly – simply it’s illogical to remove all this data – we have to
conclude that there's a mutual effect between Jupiter and the Earth Moon Data.
Please review
The Moon Diameter Is Created Based On Geometrical Calculations (Data)
https://www.academia.edu/42975472/The_Moon_Diameter_Is_Created_Based_On_Geometrical_Calculations_Data_
Session
https://www.academia.edu/s/eb9c20f28d

I do this research
2nd
14
2-3 Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets
Part I
Jupiter orbital Circumference =4900 mkm
I- Data
Let's remember the introduction data
a. Venus Jupiter distance 670.4mkm = Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm (1.4%)
b. Earth Jupiter distance 928 mkm = Earth orbital circumference 940 mkm (1.3%)
c. Mercury moves during its day period a distance = 720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter
distance. (no error)
New Data
Equation No. (I)
3413 mkm =360 mkm (Mercury)+680 mkm (Venus) +940 (Earth) mkm +1433 mkm
Equation No. (II)
4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference) = 3413 mkm +1433 mkm
II- Discussion
The previous data we have discussed before – and this data is the reason why Venus
Jupiter Relationship is so effective one
Equation No. I
3413 mkm = The Inner Planets Orbital Circumferences Total
As the equation shows clearly- this idea we know perfectly
Equation No. II
4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital circumference = 3413 mkm +1433 mkm
This equation we know also – it tells Jupiter Orbital Circumference is created
depending on the inner planet orbital circumferences total
The mutual relationship is seen clearly– let's summarize it in following:
The distances between the inner planets and Jupiter = these inner planets orbital
circumferences - that means –the inner planets orbital circumferences are created as a
result of Jupiter effect on these inner planets motions…
Now
Jupiter Orbital Circumference is created as the inner planets orbital circumferences
total –
i.e. The orbital circumferences of these 5 planets (Jupiter & the inner planets) are
created by a mutual relationship between the inner planets and Jupiter.
The idea is clear but not trustee ……Why?
Because
(1)
Venus during its orbital period (224.7 days) moves a distance =680 mkm =Venus
Jupiter Distance 670.4 mkm (1.4%) – so Venus almost supports the idea
(2)
Earth follows the rule as Venus perfectly but – the distance 928 mkm can be created
only when Earth and Jupiter be at different sides from the sun that means – Earth

I do this research
2nd
15
orbital distance 149.6 mkm + Jupiter orbital distance 778.6 mkm= 928 mkm which is
equal 940 mkm (Earth orbital circumference) (1.3%)
(3)
But ..Mercury uses its day period (=2 Mercury orbital period)-and so Mercury doesn't
follow perfectly the previous rule! The question is why Mercury day period =4222.6
hours = 2 x Mercury Orbital Period?
(4)
Mars
Mars moves during its orbital period (687 days) a distance = 1433 mkm = Saturn
Orbital Distance.
Spite Mars Orbital Distance 1433 mkm is used in Jupiter orbital circumference
definition (2 times), but Mars Orbital Distance isn't defined by the distance between
Mars And Jupiter!
A Deep Discussion
Let's summarize the idea clearly
- By some way Jupiter effect on 3 inner planets to make them create their orbital
circumferences = their distances to Jupiter (Approximately)
- Mars orbit circumference is defined by Saturn effect
- Jupiter Orbital Circumference is created depends on the inner planets orbital
circumferences total
- So, There's A Mutual Relationship between Jupiter and these 3 inner planets
(Mercury, Venus and Earth)
The idea is clear …. We have only 2 questions
- 1st
Question / How Jupiter effect on the 3 inner planets orbital circumferences?
- 2nd
Question / Why Mars orbital circumference is exceptional? Spite of that still
works as a partner in Jupiter orbital circumference (even with double values of
Mars Orbital Circumferences)?
Let's answer the first question in the next point…
This discussion details are in
Jupiter & Venus Motions Interaction https://vixra.org/abs/2003.0357

I do this research
2nd
16
Part II
I- Data
Equation No. (III)
Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec during (4224 seconds) passes a distance = 4900
mkm = Jupiter orbital circumference (But Mercury Day Period =4222.6 hours)
Equation No. (IV)
4224 mkm = 2π x 670.4 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance) (0.2%)
Equation No. (V)
(5040 seconds /4224 seconds) = (930 mkm / 778.6 mkm)
Where
Mercury Day Period needs 5040 seconds to be 176 days
And
788.6 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Distance 149.6 mkm = Earth Orbital Distance
Equation No. (VI)
4331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) = 4224 x 24.6 hours (Mars rotation Period)
II- Discussion
Equation No. (III)
This equation tells us a light passes Jupiter orbital circumference in 4224 seconds that
creates the relationship between Jupiter and the inner planets –
Simply a light beam is sent from Jupiter to the inner planets and this light beam
(energy) creates this effect of Jupiter on the inner planets
Simply this effect is seen in The Value 4224 Seconds
This value is seen in different forms in the solar planets – means – it's seen in time
period or distance value – because we deal with light motion ( high velocity motion)
and because of that the value 4224 is seen in different forms in the inner planets and
these different forms causes the change in the rule (the inner planet define its orbital
circumference to be equal its distance to Jupiter) – this rule isn't followed perfectly by
the 3inner planets in the form because each planet receive the 4224 in different form.
So
Mercury sees the value 4224 as 4222.6 hours (Mercury Day Period)
Venus sees the value 4224 as 4224 mkm (= 2π x 670.4 mkm Venus Jupiter Distance)
Earth sees the value 4224 as 4224 seconds in the following equation
Equation No. (V)
(5040 seconds /4224 seconds) = (778.6 mkm / 149.6 mkm)
So, Earth orbital distance is created relative to Jupiter orbital distance based on the
rate between 5040 seconds and the value 4224 seconds –
And based on both orbital distances – the distance between Earth and Jupiter is
created 928 mkm = 778.6 mkm +149.6 mkm
Equation No. (VI)
4331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) = 4224 x 24.6 hours (Mars rotation Period)
Note please
4331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) = 687 days (Mars orbital Period) x 2π

I do this research
2nd
17
Equation No.6 tells, Jupiter Value (4224) can't effect on Mars Orbital Circumference
(1433.5 mkm) because Mars Orbital Circumference = Saturn Orbital Distance – and
that means – Saturn effects on Mars Orbital Circumference – but still the value 4224
effects on Mars data through its Mars rotation period – and based on this effect –
some dependency is created between Mars & Jupiter Orbital Periods
Please Note
Mercury and Mars deal with the value 4224 as a period of time – but
Venus deals with this same value 4224 as a distance value – and
Earth deals with this same value 4224 as a rate with another value (5040 seconds)
(5040 seconds is required to make Mercury Day Period = 176 solar days)
A Conclusion
Jupiter Practices Some Effect On All Inner Planets By The Value 4224 – And
Through This Effect – 3 Planets Orbital Circumferences Are Created To Be
Equal These Planet Distances To Jupiter.
But
By what energy these 3inner planets were created? Because
We have concluded frequently before that…
The 3 planets circumferences (Mercury, Venus & Earth) must be created by the
Energy reflected by Neptune into 2 Trajectories of energy – each one contains (86400
mkm) (this question we should deal in Point No. 4 of this paper "Jupiter Energy")
So for now we will accept the following Conclusions
The Conclusions
(1)
These 3 inner planets circumferences are created by this light beam whose velocity
1.16 mkm/sec travels for 4224 seconds, And because of that – the 3 planets define
their orbital circumferences to be equal their distances to Jupiter –
(2)
Jupiter Orbital Circumference Is Created depends On The Inner Planets Orbital
Circumferences.
(3)
i.e.
There's A Mutual Effect Between The Inner Planets & Jupiter

I do this research
2nd
18
3- Mars Migration Theory
3-1 The Theory Summary
2-2 The Theory Proves
3-1 The Theory Summary
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus
and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its
moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84
mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus
– So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a
greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so
Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is
created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a
middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because
of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which
causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and
Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
NOTE Please
VIII. Mars Had A Life When It Was In Its Original Orbital Distance
Before The Sun Creation – But Mars Lost This Life Because Of Its
Migration And That Explain Why There's Many Features Of
Ancient Life Found On Mars
Now Let's provide a list concerning the changes happened in the solar system as result
of the sun creation in following…
Before The Sun Creation
The Solar Planets Order Was As Following

I do this research
2nd
19
- Mercury (where Pluto was The Mercury Moon) – then Mars –then Venus – Then
Earth- The Uranus – Then Neptune – Then Jupiter –
- The orbital distances of Mercury – Venus – Earth - aren't changed.
The Solar System Before Sun Creation
- Mercury Axial Tilt was 1 degree
- Mercury Day Period was 176 Solar Days
- Venus Axial Tilt was 1.774 degrees (= π1/2
degrees)
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm
- Pluto was The Mercury Moon
- Saturn Was Created After The Sun Creation
The Solar System After The Sun Creation
- Mercury Axial Tilt becomes 0.01 degree
- Venus Axial Tilt received The lost value (from 1 to 0.01) – to save the inner
planets energy – So Venus axial tilt changed from 1.774 deg to 177.4 deg
- Pluto had to move far from Mercury – with a distance = 57.9 mkm (Mercury
orbital distance) for each point (from 1 degrees to 0.01 degrees) –that forced Pluto
to move far from Mercury with a distance =(100 x 57.9 mkm) = 5906 mkm Pluto
orbital distance
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
- As a result of Mars Migration the Earth Moon was created.
- Mercury Day was decreased by 84 minutes =5040 seconds
- The inner Planets changes are recorded with Uranus Data
- Uranus hold the solar system to prevent its destruction-
- Uranus depended on Earth basically and Venus to save the solar system.
- Uranus caused Saturn to be created to help the solar system rescue.
- Saturn & Jupiter unified their powers to save the solar system.
- Uranus & Earth Connection is the first basic connection to save the solar system
and the next one is the relationship between Venus and Saturn.
- The Cycle 2737 years is a real cycle found to record the events.
- The planets data analysis shows that Uranus effects vertically on the solar system –
and Uranus by this effect prevents any overturn motion can be done by any planet
and by that Uranus helps to unify the planets general motion around the sun.
- Uranus Data Analysis shows that – there's a perpendicularity in the solar system
motion – based on that we conclude – "The is on vertical line relative to Uranus –
means – There's 180 degrees between the sun and Uranus on the vertical level.

I do this research
2nd
20
2-2 The Theory Proves
(1st
proof) The Giant –Impact Hypothesis (The Geological Proves)
(2nd
proof) The Planets Order Analysis
(3rd
proof) Mars migration Results
a- The Earth Moon Creation
b- Mars Moons Creation
c- Mars Diameter (and Mass) decreasing
d- The Asteroid Belt Creation
(4th
proof) Planet Effect On Its Neighbor
(5th
proof) Mar migration Motion Direction
(1st
proof) The Giant –Impact Hypothesis (The Geological proves)
As the paper abstract shows how Mars theory is in consistency with The Giant-
Impact hypothesis – also Mars migration theory answers many basic questions face
the giant –impact hypothesis –as we have discussed–
Why Venus has no moon?
because Mars Motion was from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)– so the direction
of Motion is defined - and Mars Motion pushed all debris to move with Mars that
made a wave pushed all debris far from Venus – So Venus Couldn't create a moon for
it. then these debris lost their high motions momentum when reach to Earth position
and because Earth mass is greater than Venus – Earth could attracted some debris and
created from them its moon –
Mars Moons supports this description because Mars with small mass could attracted
2 moons – How?
Because the debris high momentum is lost already, and its motion became so weak
even Mars could attracted its moons –
Also the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt.
Please review The Giant –Impact Hypothesis -
The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus –
This solution is so important, it solves a serious difficulty – as explained before
Now the question is why Mars had migrated when the sun is created? we have to
discuss that later…
Why Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm?
Because the planet orbital distance depends on its diameter and mass – but the order is
disturbed by Mars migration and we don't see it now – the planets order analysis we
should discuss in the following point…

I do this research
2nd
21
(2nd
proof) The Planets Order Analysis
Mars migration theory is born basically based on the planets order analysis
(Mercury – Venus – Earth)
This order of planets shows an order in planets diameters, masses and orbital distance
– the order rule is
A Greater Diameter Or Mass Needs A Greater Orbital Distance
If this order controls all planets so Mars should be the second planet after Mercury –
But –
(Jupiter – Saturn –Uranus – Neptune – Pluto)
the outer planets order shows that the rule depends on planet diameter (and not mass
because Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune but less Mass) and the rule is
reversed from the previous one
i.e.
A Greater Diameter Needs A Shorter Orbital Distance –
This analysis refers to that Mars may be found in a wrong position in the planets order
and this wrong position causes a disturbance for the planets order – based on this
analysis Mars migration theory can be concluded … to get the correct answer we
need to know if There's A Real Relationship Between Planet Diameter And
Orbital Distance. –

I do this research
2nd
22
(3rd
proof) Mars migration Results
a- The Earth Moon Creation
b- Mars Moons Creation
c- The Asteroid Belt Creation
d- Mars diameter Decreasing (4.1%)
e- Mars Mass Decreasing (4.1%)
Simply we have a reason to answer Why Venus has no moon but Mars (mass =1/13)
has 2 moons?!
The fact shows itself clearly – there were no debris around Venus to create a moon!
But Mars had!? Why? because of the Motion Direction
Mars had moved from the Point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) from the sun and
pushed all debris with it in the same motion direction – so no debris left around Venus
– because all debris had moved with Mars in its Motion Direction
Now if we practice such event – what expectation we may conclude?
Mars Diameter (and Mass) must be decreased
i.e.
Mars Diameter (and Mass) must be decreased than their values when Mars was in its
original orbital distance (84 mkm)
Can this conclusion be proved?
The gravitation Equation works only with Saturn and Jupiter Masses – where
If Mars Mass is increased by 4.1% the gravitation equation can work
(Equation Error 3.4%)
Question (1)
Why don't all planets follow the gravitation equation?!
Because of Mars migration which caused disturbance for the planets order
Question (2)
Is there any proof that Mars Diameter is decreased by the same rate (4.1%) Yes
Mercury orbital distance 57.9 mkm = Mercury Diameter 4879 km x 1092
Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm = Earth Diameter 12756 km x 1092
Satrun orbital distance 1433.5 mkm = Satrun Diameter 120536 km x 1092
Mars (org) orbital distance 84 mkm = Mars (org) Diameter 7070km x 1092
(Mars Diameter 7070 km is increased than the Mars registered diameter 6792 km
with 4.1%)
4.3
MassSatrun
MassJupiter
distance)orbital(Jupiter
distance)orbital(Saturn
2
2
==
0.33MassMercury
0.668MassMars
mkm)84distanceorbitaloriginal(Mars
mkm)57.9distanceorbital(Mercury
2
2
=

I do this research
2nd
23
(4th
proof) Planet Effect On Its Neighbor
Let's summarize the idea in following…
- I claim each planet effect on its neighbor planet data and motion
- I provide data shows such effect (for example Earth effects on Mars Motion)
So
- If we have found data claiming that – Mars Motion is effected by Mercury Data –
so this data may refer to that – Mars was a neighbor of Mercury
I- Data
(1)
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 1.9
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (The moon orbital period) x 25.2
But 25.2 degrees = Mars axial tilt and 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital incaution
Also 25.2 deg (Mars axial tilt and) = (1.9 deg. Mars orbital incaution) x 13.18 deg.
Where
The moon motion degrees daily =13.18 degrees
We should not limit our discussion for just Data consistency – let's see its depth
Because
Mars moves per solar day = 0.524 degrees (=360 degrees /687 days)
The value 0.524 degrees = (1/1.9) where 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital incaution
i.e.
Mars Data (25.2, 1.9, 0.524 …etc) depends on the solar day period of time
(2)
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 687 days (Mars orbital period) x 2 π
II-Discussion
The previous data shows that Earth and moon on one side and Jupiter on the other
side all of them effect on Mars orbital period (i.e. effect on Mars Motion)
More Data
Equation No. (1)
Equation No. (2)
Equation No. (3)
Equation No. (5)
7 deg. (Mercury Orbital Inclination)= 1.9 deg. (Mars Orbital Inclination)+ 5.1
deg. (Earth Moon Orbital Inclination)
524.0
MassMercury
MassMars
)
DiameterMars
DiameterMercury
( 2
==
93.3
mkm57.9DistanceOrbitalMercury
mkm227.9DistanceOrbitalMars
days175.94DayMercury
days687PeriodOrbitalMars
==
029.1
days354.36YearSynodicMoon
days365.25PeriodOrbitalEarth
hours24DayEarth
hours24.7DayMars
==

I do this research
2nd
24
(5th
proof) Mar migration Motion Direction
Let's summarize the idea in following
- The solar system has one defined motion which is the planets revolution around
the sun
- Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) is a new direction of Motion is
unknown in the solar system
- In this point I refer to another motion started from Jupiter to Pluto – and this
motion is in the same direction of Mars migration Motion which makes Mars
migration Motion is a defined motion in the solar system and not a unique one
Please review Jupiter Data Analysis in my previous paper
Please review
The Sun Creation Reason And Effect (II)
https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0534
The Earth is Older Than The Sun
The Solar Planets Order Still Shows More Puzzles

I do this research
2nd
25
References
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why?
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/42966021/Is_The_Earth_Moon_Diameter_Created_Based_On_Geometrical_Calculations_Why_II_
The Earth Moon is Older Than Saturn https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0573
The Earth is Older Than The Sun https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0553
The Sun Creation Reason And Effect (II) https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0534
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0421
Can Titius Bode Law Disprove Mars Immigration Theory?
Research Paper "The Solar Planets Order Still Shows More Puzzles"
Lorentz Length Contraction (More Discussion) https://vixra.org/abs/1911.0431
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of publications: http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon

Similar to Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon