Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics &
Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis and
Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN
University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 14th
May 2020
1- Abstract
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference =
the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth
Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this
area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by
any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the
moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither
perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related
to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the
planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are
defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The
Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper –
and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A
Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)

I do this research
2nd
2
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
2-1 The Moon Orbit Triangle Analysis
2-2 The Moon Orbit Analysis
2-2 The Moon Orbit Triangle Analysis
Figure No.1 (Note Please – FDBR is a square)
Figure shows the moon orbit around Earth with some details (my created figure)
Where……
AB= BC= 86000 km= 2x 43000 km
BR=CR = 43000 km
AD=BD = 43000 km
EB =363000 km = Perigee radius (perigee is the nearest point, the moon can reach)
EC= 378000 km= Earth Moon Distance when the moon in total solar eclipse point
EG= 384000 km = The Moon Orbital Distance (registered in NASA Planetary sheet)
ED= 406000 km = Apogee radius (Apogee is the most far point, the moon can reach)
Data
(EB)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (EC)2
(error 1%)
(EC)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (EG)2
(error 0.5%)
(EG)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (S)2
(where S= 394000 km- unknown point)
(S)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (ED)2
(error 0.7%)
AC = 120536 km = Saturn Diameter
EC = 378000 km = Saturn Circumference
AE= 449378.3 km = Jupiter Circumference

I do this research
2nd
3
2-2 The Moon Orbit Analysis
Data
EB =363000 km = (Perigee Radius) =The Outer Planets Diameters Total (Error 1%)
ED= 406000 km= (Apogee Radius) = The Solar Planets Diameters Total
EC= 378000 km= Total solar eclipse Radius) = Saturn Circumference
BD= 43000 km = distance from Perigee to apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner
planets diameters total
Note please – here we deal with the space only – means we have to remove the moon
from this distance and based on that 43000km – 3475 km= 39525 km
39525 km= Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total (Error 1.4%)
Let's try to see that as deep as possible
If we put the moon on the perigee point accurately – in this case – the distance from
Earth to the moon including the moon diameter will be = the outer planets diameters
total without error – and in this same case the rest distance to the apogee radius
(406000km) will be 39525 km which = Earth Circumference = the inner diameters
total (1.4%)
That may explain the geometrical distribution of the distances
Discussion
About what we search here? let's remember the question
Can The Space Be Formed Geometrically?
I try to show that the moon motion basic points are defined by different values in the
solar system –
For example
The moon can't go beyond the apogee radius (406000km) – because this value is
defined by 3 different methods:
(1) By the moon motion where the moon never go beyond this point
(2) By the solar planets diameters total – because this value =406000 km = all
diameters total (regardless ho this diameters total can effect on the moon motion)
(3) By the moon orbit triangle which we have seen in the previous (sub-point) – so if
this triangle is created based on geometrical rules so the distance 406000 km is
controlled by these geometrical rules
We don't know by what mechanism these different values can effect on the moon
orbit and define the moon motion basic points – we know only that – there are 3
reasons produce the same value (for example 406000 km) So these three methods
control each other! Why? because the solar system in one geometrical building

I do this research
2nd
4
Let's review our old concept
- The solar system is one body and each planet is a member in this same body
- The solar system is one building and each planet is a part of this same building
- The solar system is one machine and each planet is a gear in it
- The solar system is one Trajectory of energy and each planet is a point on it
- The solar system is a puppets theater – all planets move together as train carriages
We try to discover how the data is created- the previous data shows clearly that there's
some geometrical reason to divide the distance – now the moon motion is a result and
not the reason
That means – the moon motion is restricted between 2 points (Perigee And Apogee)
because of a geometrical reason out of the moon motion
Not the gravity is the reason – it's the solar system (general) geometry which creates
the restriction points
How to explain that….
The solar system geometrical design is similar to a painting by a pencil
Now
The planet motion add colors for this painting – this idea will help us greatly to
answer the question
"Why couldn't Titus Bode law predict Neptune orbital distance but predicted perfectly
Pluto orbital distance?"
Simply because – Pluto Orbital Distance is a point defined geometrically by the solar
system geometry but Neptune orbital distance was not defined – this idea we will
discuss deeply with The Moon Creation Theory (Mars Migration Theory) (Point No.
4 of this paper).
So the moon can't be nearer than the perigee radius (r= 363000 km) because there's a
geometrical reason defined by the solar system geometry prevents the moon to be
nearer – that explains the data – let's use example for better Explanation …
Example No. 1
In the moon orbit triangle why I have create the Point (A) where the distance between
the Point (A) and Earth = AE = 449378.3 km = Jupiter Circumference
So why I created the point (A)?
I have learnt that from the data – because –
I have found that –Saturn Circumference =Earth Moon Distance at Total Solar Eclipse
So I have thought may Jupiter Circumference equal any other distance in the moon
orbit and I used the same rule started from Earth and measured the distance – now the
surprise is that – from perigee to apogee =43000 km = from apogee to point (A)
I wish I explain the idea as clear as possible - we deal with geometrical building here
and because of that the data is used frequently – but we don't know How the matter is
created relative to the space But we know that the matter is created relative to the
space and that means no space can be created without matter…

I do this research
2nd
5
More Discussion
The moon orbit data is one of the most rich data in the solar system – the data is so
wide and powerful – please take a patient look at the triangle – it's a geometrical
triangle found based on geometrical rules – no any coincidences can be found here
Still the question is behind
Why or how the moon orbit is built by these geometrical rules? By what power it's
done? How Saturn and Jupiter data can effect here on the moon orbit creation process
To answer this question
We should remember our (acceptable) concepts
1- The matter is created of energy (E=mc2
) and
2- Space = Energy
By these 2 concepts we simply unify the matter and space origin and that means just
one hand is found behind
The energy creates the matter and space relative to each other geometrically
Again
Now space can be found without matter - based on that the old questions find new
answers….
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc?
Because
(the sun diameter / the moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
Again
Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Because the matter is created with the space proportional to each other geometrically
– both are geometrical players in the solar system geometry
And no space can be found without matter and no matter is created without space
The main hand behind is the energy which create both of them
Now – ask – Why Jupiter Circumference Value Is Used In The Moon Orbit?
This question is answered in sub- point
(3-2 Jupiter Energy is Transported into The moon orbit)

I do this research
2nd
6
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
3-1 Jupiter effect on the moon Creation
3-2 Jupiter Energy is Transported into The moon orbit
3-3 The Moon Orbit Perigee Radius
3-1 Jupiter effects on the moon Creation
We have discussed this fact frequently – let's summarize its proves in following:
I-Data
1- Jupiter circumference x the moon circumference = Jupiter orbital circumference
2- the sun diameter x the moon diameter = Jupiter orbital circumference
3- Jupiter diameter/ the moon circumference = 13.1
But
4- 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 13.1 x 329.8 days (lunar Sidereal Year)
5- 29.2 = 13.1 x 2.23 days
6- 2x 4331days (Jupiter orbital period) = 25.2 x 346.6 days (the Nodal Year)
7- 4331days (Jupiter orbital period) = 687 days Mars orbital period x 2π
8- (1461 days/ 2.23 days) = π2
x (the moon rotation period/ Jupiter rotation period)
9- 25920 = Jupiter Mass / the moon Mass
10- Jupiter diameter/ the moon diameter = 41
11- the sun diameter x Jupiter diameter = 2 x (the planets orbital circumferences total)
12- The moon orbital area =the planets orbital circumferences total (3%)
13- 2x 4331days (Jupiter orbital period) = 318 x 27.3 days (the moon orbital period)
II-Discussion
This data we have discussed deeply in my papers
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
https://www.academia.edu/43000947/Can_Jupiter_effect_on_the_Earth_Moon
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43020209/Can_Jupiter_effect_on_the_Earth_Moon_II_
The point which we need to refer here is that
The Moon Orbit area = 1/2 Jupiter Energy (If Distance = Energy)
And both values are seen in red lines in the previous data
But
In fact Jupiter energy total is transported into the moon orbit- not half of this energy
but all energy – let's discuss that in details in the following point
("the moon" word means "the Earth moon")

I do this research
2nd
7
3-2 Jupiter Energy is Transported into The moon orbit
We agree that Space = Energy and i.e. Distance = Energy
Jupiter Energy we have discussed in the previous paper
Is Jupiter The Solar System Parent? (Jupiter Energy Analysis)
https://www.academia.edu/43030586/Is_Jupiter_The_Solar_System_Parent_Jupiter_Energy_Analysis_
let's remember it here:
Jupiter energy is a distance = 201467 million km – this value is used frequently in the
solar system geometry – let's see the data here again ….
Equation no. (a)
201467 mkm = 2 x The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total 100733.5 mkm
(The moon orbit area is a rectangle its length = 100733.5 mkm and its breadth =1
mkm but this calculation has error =3%)
Equation no. (b)
201467 mkm = (Pluto Orbital Circumference – Jupiter orbital circumference) x 2π
Equation no. (c)
201467 mkm = 28255 mkm (Neptune orbital circumference) + 2 x 86400 mkm
Equation no. (d)
201467 mkm = 2 x 86400 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec (light supposed velocity)
Equation no. (e)
201467 mkm = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) x 41
(note 41= Jupiter diameter /the moon diameter)
Equation no. (f)
201467 mkm = (Jupiter Circumference 449378.3 km)2
Equation no. (g)
201467 mkm = Jupiter Diameter x The Sun Diameter
Discussion
Also the previous data we have discussed deeply in the previous paper
Let's discuss the point which we search for?
The moon orbit area = 100733.5 mkm2
with error (3%)
i.e.
the moon orbit area (a rectangle its length =100733.5 mkm) = half of Jupiter energy
where? At apogee point!
I calculated the area between (Perigee radius 0.363 mk) and (apogee radius 0.406 mk)
And this area produce a distance = a half of Jupiter Energy (Distance)
But
We may remember that I have add the point (A) to the moon orbit where
The distance between Perigee & Apogee Distance =43000 km = the distance between
Apogee and The Point A (please review the moon orbit triangle)
The means – the distance from Perigee to the point (A) =86000 km – and this distance
area = Jupiter Energy Total

I do this research
2nd
8
A CONCLUSION
The distance from Perigee to the Point A on the moon orbit triangle = 86000km
And the area of this distance 86000 km = 201467 mkm = 2 x The Planets Orbital
Circumferences Total 100733.5 mkm = Jupiter Energy (Distance)
LET'S ASK AGAIN
Why Jupiter Circumference value is used in the moon orbit triangle?
Because the moon orbit (area) expresses Jupiter Energy
How that happens? It's out of the paper scope
We here deal with facts
The distance = 201467 mkm = which we have seen frequently in Jupiter Data is used
here clearly as the moon orbit area
About what questions we create this paper… let's remember
1- Has The Space A Geometrical Form?
Yes – the space has geometrical form and the space is a geometrical player – the
previous data shows and proves that
2- Can Jupiter effect on the moon creation and the motion?
Yes of course because the energy is transported from Jupiter into the moon orbit
and by this energy Jupiter effect on the moon data and motion
But what about the error 3%? How to explain that?

I do this research
2nd
9
3-3 The Moon Orbit Perigee Radius
In the previous calculation there's an error 3%
How to explain that?
The perigee radius =363000 km
But may be this value was changed through history
Means
Perigee Radius was 364320 km
With difference = 1310 km (error 3%)
This value 1310 km = 100 x 13.1
Where
13.1 = (Jupiter diameter / the moon circumference)
The rate 13.1 we have discussed frequently in sub-point (3-1) in this paper
So – it's probable that – the moon changed its perigee point –
The rate can't disprove the idea because – the energy in the moon orbit is greater than
Jupiter energy and not less than it – because the energy can be accumulated with time
So if the rate 3% by minus it effects more negatively.
Any way the conclusion depends on the rate 13.1 which is so specific between Jupiter
and the moon –
At end this conclusion has no more supporter data – and because of that – I provide it
as a guess only (unsupported hypothesis).

I do this research
2nd
10
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
4-1 The Theory Summary
4-2 The Theory Proves
3-1 The Theory Summary
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus
and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its
moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84
mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus
– So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a
greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so
Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is
created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a
middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because
of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which
causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and
Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
NOTE Please
VIII. Mars Had A Life When It Was In Its Original Orbital Distance
Before The Sun Creation – But Mars Lost This Life Because Of Its
Migration And That Explain Why There's Many Features Of
Ancient Life Found On Mars
Now Let's complete this story because we still have some details to be added

I do this research
2nd
11
Pluto Migration
- Pluto was the Mercury Moon and had to migrate with Mars Migration –
- Pluto was thrown to the end point in the solar system – where Neptune was
occupied the point 5906 mkm – But – Pluto had collided with Neptune – and
pushed it far from the point 5906 mkm
- From Pluto Neptune Collision debris the kuiper belt and Pluto moons were
created.
- That explains why Pluto Neptune Distance = Pluto eccentricity distance – where
Pluto had pushed Neptune out of its eccentricity range regardless where Neptune
will be
- That answers the old question – Why Titus Bode Law couldn't predict Neptune
orbital distance but predicted Pluto orbital distance? Because (the solar space
which is formed geometrically) defines a point 5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance)
which was occupied by Neptune – but Pluto pushed Neptune out of this space
point (which was defined geometrically) and Now Neptune will be in some
undefined space (geometrically) – so the geometrical rule will define easily Pluto
orbital distance (5906 mkm) but can't define (Neptune orbital distance 4495.1
mkm).
- This also answer the question – why Neptune consumed 14% of Jupiter energy to
create its orbital circumference but Pluto reflected Jupiter energy without any
consumption? That because the point 5906 mkm is defined geometrically and has
its own energy because it's an original geometrical point in the solar system – but
Neptune orbital distance (4495.1 mkm) is a point undefined geometrically and has
no source of energy – that forced Neptune to consume Jupiter energy (14%) to
create this new point (449.1 mkm)
Now let's provide a list of changes that were happened because of the sun Creation.
Before The Sun Creation
The Solar Planets Order Was As Following
- Mercury (where Pluto was The Mercury Moon) – then Mars –then Venus – Then
Earth- The Uranus – Then Neptune – Then Jupiter –
- The orbital distances of Mercury – Venus – Earth - aren't changed.
The Solar System Before Sun Creation
- Mercury Axial Tilt was 1 degree
- Mercury Day Period was 176 Solar Days
- Venus Axial Tilt was 1.774 degrees (= π1/2
degrees)
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm

I do this research
2nd
12
- Pluto was The Mercury Moon
- Saturn Was Created After The Sun Creation
The Solar System After The Sun Creation
- Mercury Axial Tilt becomes 0.01 degree
- Venus Axial Tilt received The lost value (from 1 to 0.01) – to save the inner
planets energy – So Venus axial tilt changed from 1.774 deg to 177.4 deg
- Pluto had to move far from Mercury – with a distance = 57.9 mkm (Mercury
orbital distance) for each point (from 1 degrees to 0.01 degrees) –that forced Pluto
to move far from Mercury with a distance =(100 x 57.9 mkm) = 5906 mkm Pluto
orbital distance
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
- As a result of Mars Migration the Earth Moon was created.
- Mercury Day was decreased by 84 minutes =5040 seconds
- The inner Planets changes are recorded with Uranus Data
- Uranus hold the solar system to prevent its destruction-
- Uranus depended on Earth basically and Venus to save the solar system.
- Uranus caused Saturn to be created to help the solar system rescue.
- Saturn & Jupiter unified their powers to save the solar system.
- Uranus & Earth Connection is the first basic connection to save the solar system
and the next one is the relationship between Venus and Saturn.
- The Cycle 2737 years is a real cycle found to record the events.
- The planets data analysis shows that Uranus effects vertically on the solar system –
and Uranus by this effect prevents any overturn motion can be done by any planet
and by that Uranus helps to unify the planets general motion around the sun.
- Uranus Data Analysis shows that – there's a perpendicularity in the solar system
motion – based on that we conclude – "The is on vertical line relative to Uranus –
means – There's 180 degrees between the sun and Uranus on the vertical level.

I do this research
2nd
13
4-2 The Theory Proves
(1st
proof) The Giant –Impact Hypothesis (The Geological Proves)
(2nd
proof) The Planets Order Analysis
(3rd
proof) Mars migration Results
a- The Earth Moon Creation
b- Mars Moons Creation
c- Mars Diameter (and Mass) decreasing
d- The Asteroid Belt Creation
(4th
proof) Planet Effect On Its Neighbor
(5th
proof) Mar migration Motion Direction
(1st
proof) The Giant –Impact Hypothesis (The Geological proves)
As the paper abstract shows how Mars theory is in consistency with The Giant-
Impact hypothesis – also Mars migration theory answers many basic questions face
the giant –impact hypothesis –as we have discussed–
Why Venus has no moon?
because Mars Motion was from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)– so the direction
of Motion is defined - and Mars Motion pushed all debris to move with Mars that
made a wave pushed all debris far from Venus – So Venus Couldn't create a moon for
it. then these debris lost their high motions momentum when reach to Earth position
and because Earth mass is greater than Venus – Earth could attracted some debris and
created from them its moon –
Mars Moons supports this description because Mars with small mass could attracted
2 moons – How?
Because the debris high momentum is lost already, and its motion became so weak
even Mars could attracted its moons –
Also the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt.
Please review The Giant –Impact Hypothesis -
The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus –
This solution is so important, it solves a serious difficulty – as explained before
Now the question is why Mars had migrated when the sun is created? we have to
discuss that later…
Why Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm?
Because the planet orbital distance depends on its diameter and mass – but the order is
disturbed by Mars migration and we don't see it now – the planets order analysis we
should discuss in the following point…

I do this research
2nd
14
(2nd
proof) The Planets Order Analysis
Mars migration theory is born basically based on the planets order analysis
(Mercury – Venus – Earth)
This order of planets shows an order in planets diameters, masses and orbital distance
– the order rule is
A Greater Diameter Or Mass Needs A Greater Orbital Distance
If this order controls all planets so Mars should be the second planet after Mercury –
But –
(Jupiter – Saturn –Uranus – Neptune – Pluto)
the outer planets order shows that the rule depends on planet diameter (and not mass
because Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune but less Mass) and the rule is
reversed from the previous one
i.e.
A Greater Diameter Needs A Shorter Orbital Distance –
This analysis refers to that Mars may be found in a wrong position in the planets order
and this wrong position causes a disturbance for the planets order – based on this
analysis Mars migration theory can be concluded … to get the correct answer we
need to know if There's A Real Relationship Between Planet Diameter And
Orbital Distance. –

I do this research
2nd
15
(3rd
proof) Mars migration Results
a- The Earth Moon Creation
b- Mars Moons Creation
c- The Asteroid Belt Creation
d- Mars diameter Decreasing (4.1%)
e- Mars Mass Decreasing (4.1%)
Simply we have a reason to answer Why Venus has no moon but Mars (mass =1/13)
has 2 moons?!
The fact shows itself clearly – there were no debris around Venus to create a moon!
But Mars had!? Why? because of the Motion Direction
Mars had moved from the Point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) from the sun and
pushed all debris with it in the same motion direction – so no debris left around Venus
– because all debris had moved with Mars in its Motion Direction
Now if we practice such event – what expectation we may conclude?
Mars Diameter (and Mass) must be decreased
i.e.
Mars Diameter (and Mass) must be decreased than their values when Mars was in its
original orbital distance (84 mkm)
Can this conclusion be proved?
The gravitation Equation works only with Saturn and Jupiter Masses – where
If Mars Mass is increased by 4.1% the gravitation equation can work
(Equation Error 3.4%)
Question (1)
Why don't all planets follow the gravitation equation?!
Because of Mars migration which caused disturbance for the planets order
Question (2)
Is there any proof that Mars Diameter is decreased by the same rate (4.1%) Yes
Mercury orbital distance 57.9 mkm = Mercury Diameter 4879 km x 1092
Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm = Earth Diameter 12756 km x 1092
Satrun orbital distance 1433.5 mkm = Satrun Diameter 120536 km x 1092
Mars (org) orbital distance 84 mkm = Mars (org) Diameter 7070km x 1092
(Mars Diameter 7070 km is increased than the Mars registered diameter 6792 km
with 4.1%)
4.3
MassSatrun
MassJupiter
distance)orbital(Jupiter
distance)orbital(Saturn
2
2
==
0.33MassMercury
0.668MassMars
mkm)84distanceorbitaloriginal(Mars
mkm)57.9distanceorbital(Mercury
2
2
=

I do this research
2nd
16
(4th
proof) Planet Effect On Its Neighbor
Let's summarize the idea in following…
- I claim each planet effect on its neighbor planet data and motion
- I provide data shows such effect (for example Earth effects on Mars Motion)
So
- If we have found data claiming that – Mars Motion is effected by Mercury Data –
so this data may refer to that – Mars was a neighbor of Mercury
I- Data
(1)
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 1.9
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (The moon orbital period) x 25.2
But 25.2 degrees = Mars axial tilt and 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital incaution
Also 25.2 deg (Mars axial tilt and) = (1.9 deg. Mars orbital incaution) x 13.18 deg.
Where
The moon motion degrees daily =13.18 degrees
We should not limit our discussion for just Data consistency – let's see its depth
Because
Mars moves per solar day = 0.524 degrees (=360 degrees /687 days)
The value 0.524 degrees = (1/1.9) where 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital incaution
i.e.
Mars Data (25.2, 1.9, 0.524 …etc) depends on the solar day period of time
(2)
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 687 days (Mars orbital period) x 2 π
II-Discussion
The previous data shows that Earth and moon on one side and Jupiter on the other
side all of them effect on Mars orbital period (i.e. effect on Mars Motion)
More Data
Equation No. (1)
Equation No. (2)
Equation No. (3)
Equation No. (5)
7 deg. (Mercury Orbital Inclination)= 1.9 deg. (Mars Orbital Inclination)+ 5.1
deg. (Earth Moon Orbital Inclination)
524.0
MassMercury
MassMars
)
DiameterMars
DiameterMercury
( 2
==
93.3
mkm57.9DistanceOrbitalMercury
mkm227.9DistanceOrbitalMars
days175.94DayMercury
days687PeriodOrbitalMars
==
029.1
days354.36YearSynodicMoon
days365.25PeriodOrbitalEarth
hours24DayEarth
hours24.7DayMars
==

I do this research
2nd
17
(5th
proof) Mar migration Motion Direction
Let's summarize the idea in following
- The solar system has one defined motion which is the planets revolution around
the sun
- Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) is a new direction of Motion is
unknown in the solar system
- In this point I refer to another motion started from Jupiter to Pluto – and this
motion is in the same direction of Mars migration Motion which makes Mars
migration Motion is a defined motion in the solar system and not a unique one
Please review Jupiter Data Analysis in my previous paper
Please review
The Sun Creation Reason And Effect (II)
https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0534
The Earth is Older Than The Sun
The Solar Planets Order Still Shows More Puzzles

I do this research
2nd
18
References
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why?
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/42966021/Is_The_Earth_Moon_Diameter_Created_Based_On_Geometrical_Calculations_Why_II_
The Earth Moon is Older Than Saturn https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0573
The Earth is Older Than The Sun https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0553
The Sun Creation Reason And Effect (II) https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0534
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0421
Can Titius Bode Law Disprove Mars Immigration Theory?
Research Paper "The Solar Planets Order Still Shows More Puzzles"
Lorentz Length Contraction (More Discussion) https://vixra.org/abs/1911.0431
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of publications: http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space

Similar to Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space