Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈 ✅ Quality You get an original and high-quality paper based on extensive research. The completed work will be correctly formatted, referenced and tailored to your level of study. ✅ Confidentiality We value your privacy. We do not disclose your personal information to any third party without your consent. Your payment data is also safely handled as you process the payment through a secured and verified payment processor. ✅ Originality Every single order we deliver is written from scratch according to your instructions. We have zero tolerance for plagiarism, so all completed papers are unique and checked for plagiarism using a leading plagiarism detector. ✅ On-time delivery We strive to deliver quality custom written papers before the deadline. That's why you don't have to worry about missing the deadline for submitting your assignment. ✅ Free revisions You can ask to revise your paper as many times as you need until you're completely satisfied with the result. Provide notes about what needs to be changed, and we'll change it right away. ✅ 24/7 Support From answering simple questions to solving any possible issues, we're always here to help you in chat and on the phone. We've got you covered at any time, day or night. Comparison of Two Newspaper Articles Comparison of Two Newspaper Articles These two articles are about asylum seekers. Both articles agree that there are too many asylum seekers, but are presented in a very different way to each other. Article one is a shorter more aggressive tract, not intended to make the reader think about the article but just to instantly agree with it. Article two however stands back and looks at the problem, why it has arisen and suggests ways that there can be resolutions. Both papers also criticise the government for being too lenient, and for not taking any action. Both identify David Blunkett, naming the government s minister responsible for this area of policy, an important factual ingredient. The two...show more content...These people are the opposite to the writer of article one who also has not seen both sides of the argument. The writer of article one relies on strong and emotive language to get her point across and to get people to see her point of view. She also tries to win a sympathy vote by starting to blame the asylum seekers for our second rate education system, long waiting lists for operations, people dying on hospital trolleys in corridors and the inadequacies of our social services system. In a way the author is right but for the wrong reason, that there are so many of them . She also tries to make the reader feel a bit hard done to by the government by commenting on how in Leeds the asylum seekers have got their own mobile health clinic when normal British people can t get to see a G.P for love nor money , in actual fact this is because the G.P s won t take them on because they don t speak English and that they have too many patie

1. Comparison of Two Newspaper Articles
Comparison of Two Newspaper Articles
These two articles are about asylum seekers. Both articles agree that there are too many asylum seekers, but are presented in a very different way
to each other. Article one is a shorter more aggressive tract, not intended to make the reader think about the article but just to instantly agree with
it. Article two however stands back and looks at the problem, why it has arisen and suggests ways that there can be resolutions. Both papers also
criticise the government for being too lenient, and for not taking any action. Both identify David Blunkett, naming the government's minister
responsible for this area of policy, an important factual ingredient. The two...show more content...
These people are the opposite to the writer of article one who also has not seen both sides of the argument.
The writer of article one relies on strong and emotive language to get her point across and to get people to see her point of view. She also tries
to win a 'sympathy vote' by starting to blame the asylum seekers for our second rate education system, long waiting lists for operations,
people dying on hospital trolleys in corridors and the inadequacies of our social services system. In a way the author is right but for the
wrong reason, 'that there are so many of them'. She also tries to make the reader feel a bit hard done to by the government by commenting on
how in Leeds the asylum seekers have got their own mobile health clinic when normal British people 'can't get to see a G.P for love nor
money', in actual fact this is because the G.P's won't take them on because they don't speak English and that they have too many patients as it is.
The real reason for the lack of quality in our UNDERFUNDED public services is that to keep these asylum seekers housed and give them
benefits costs more than to put them up in a top notch hotel for that night, and at two hundred and fifty hundred pounds a night for one hundred
thousand legal immigrants a year that is over twenty five million pounds a day. If we
Get more content on HelpWriting.net