• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Doing history

Doing history



Explanation of historical inquiry and the discipline of history

Explanation of historical inquiry and the discipline of history



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Doing history Doing history Presentation Transcript

    • Introduction to the Historical Discipline
    • This presentation introduces• The historical discipline, including the kinds of questions that historians ask• The variety of primary sources that historians use• How to analyze primary sources• How to use secondary sources
    • Part OneThe Historical Discipline
    • Why History?
    • A People Without a History Are Like Wind in the Buffalo Grass (Lakota Indians)• Why is a peoples memory of itself essential to its identity?• How is the absence of a peoples collective memory like the wind in the buffalo grass?• What does this analogy tell us about the Lakota Indians?
    • What Others Have Said•History is more or less bunk. (Henry Ford)•Those who cannot remember the past are condemned torepeat it. (Santayana)•History is a peoples memory, and without memory man isdemoted to the lower animals. (Malcolm X)•History is a science, no less and no more. (J.B. Bury)•History is an argument without end. (Peter Geyl)•No single man makes history. (Boris Pasternak)
    • How is history different than other disciplines?
    • Historians Want To Know • What? • Why? • How? • When? • Who?
    • The Historian as Investigative Reporter • Study the data • Conduct interviews • Hear all points of view.
    • The Basic Steps of Historical Analysis• Identify a historical problem or an interesting historical topic.• Find appropriate sources.• Analyze the sources by asking the right questions.• Create analytical narratives or histories about the past.
    • The Big Questions Historians Ask: SocialHow did those originally excludedfrom the political process (thepropertyless, women, African-Americans, Latinos, Asians, gays &lesbians) win their way into thedemocratic system?
    • The Big Questions Historians Ask: Political What explains the decline of new deal liberalism after 1964?
    • The Big Questions Historians Ask: EconomicWhat factors contributed to industrialdevelopment in the Northern states during themiddle of the nineteenth century?
    • The Big Questions Historians Ask: CulturalHow have definitions ofsuccess changed over time?
    • Part Two: Types of Sources• Primary Sources: sources written or created by the historical actors• Secondary Sources: findings of someone who did not observe the event, but who investigated primary sources other secondary accounts to retell the event
    • Primary SourcesWritten Visual Oral
    • Types of Written Primary Sources• Memoirs• Diaries• Letters• Government records• Newspapers
    • Types of Visual Primary Sources • Paintings • Cartoons • Photographs • Films • Television
    • Types of Oral Primary Sources• Stories and Narratives• Oral histories• Anecdotes• Jokes• Folk songs• Radio recordings• Popular music
    • Part Three: Analyzing Primary Sources • Basic Questions to Ask All primary sources • The Time and Place Rule • The Bias Rule • Assessing the Quality of the Primary Source • Special Instructions for Visual Sources
    • Questions to Ask All Primary Documents • Who created the document? • What is the nature of the document? • When was the document created? • Why was the document created? • What does the document mean?
    • The Time and Place RuleUsually, the closer in time and place a source and its creator were toan event in the past, the better the source will be. Thus the bestprimary sources might include some of the following: • Direct traces of the event • Accounts of the event, created at the time it occurred, by firsthand observers and participants • Accounts of the event, created after the event occurred, by firsthand observers and participants • Accounts of the event, created after the event occurred, by people who did not participate or witness the event, but who used interviews or evidence from the time of the event.
    • The Bias Rule• Every piece of evidence and every source must be read or viewed skeptically and critically.• No piece of evidence should be taken at face value. The creators point of view must be considered.• Each piece of evidence and source must be cross- checked and compared with related sources and pieces of evidence.
    • Assessing the Quality of the Primary Source• Who created the source and why?• Did the recorder have firsthand knowledge of the event?• Was the recorder a neutral party?• Was the source meant to be public or private?• Did the recorder wish to inform or persuade others?• Was the information recorded during the event, immediately after the event, or after some lapse of time?
    • Special Suggestions for Visual Sources • Look for internal clues to determine when the visual source was created • Look at the internal evidence by dividing the illustration into parts: background and foreground, individuals, objects, or quadrants
    • Part Four: How to UseSecondary Sources
    • Types of Secondary Sources• Textbooks• Monographs (published books on specific topics)• Statistical tables• Graphs• Pictures and drawings• Historical novels, short stories, movies
    • Ways to Use Secondary Sources• As a collection of facts• As a source of background material for a specific time, a specific place, or a specific concept• As an interpretation to stimulate your thinking
    • Questions To Ask Secondary Sources• What is the authors thesis?• Is the thesis relevant to my research?• How can I determine the accuracy of the secondary source?
    • How To Evaluate aSecondary Source • Currency • Authority • Scholarship
    • Questions to Consider When Assessing a Secondary Source• What is the author’s evidence?• Does the evidence support the author’s thesis?• What are the author’s biases? How much do these biases influence the author’s interpretation?
    • Special Questions for Internet Sources• Who published this document?• What credentials does the author claim to have?• What is the author’s objective in producing the document?• How current is the site?• Do traditional sources of information substantiate information found in an Internet-based source?
    • Special Questions for Journal Articles• When was the article published?• Who publishes the journal?• What type of paper is it? – Opinion paper? – Empirical study? – Literature review?• What is the nature of the supporting evidence• Is there a bibliography?•
    • The End