Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Decision Support for Urban Environmental Planning

2,422 views

Published on

Presented by Dr. Vishal K. Mehta, Invited speaker at the 6th International Public Policy and Management Conference held at the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, India.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

Decision Support for Urban Environmental Planning

  1. 1. Decision Support for Urban Environmental Planning Vishal K. Mehta, Ph.D. Stockholm Environment Institute vishal.mehta@sei-us.org www.sei-international.org www.sei-us.org Dec 29, 2011 6th International Public Policy and Management Conference IIM-Bangalore, India Acknowledgements: M.Sekhar, D.Malghan, Arghyam
  2. 2. OUTLINE I. Decision Support in Planning Need for Decision Support Examples II. Barriers to effective decision Support Knowledge Gaps III. Ongoing Research
  3. 3. 1. Need for Decision Support in Urban PlanningTHE CHALLENGE TransportDecisions made Security Energy across multiple sectors Comprehensive In multiple dimensions and Integrated Urban Planning by multiple actors/agencies Landuse Water Infrastructure
  4. 4. 1. Need for Decision Support in Urban Planning DriversLARGE UNCERTAINTIES Impact Critical uncertainties Uncertainty
  5. 5. 1. Need for Decision Support in Urban PlanningRAPID URBANIZATION -> CHANGING CITY Bangalore, India:• In 60 yrs, India’s urban Population Density Built-up area % Year (per sq population growth rate (m) km) urban footprint twice that of overall 1971 1.65 9,465 20% population 1981 2.92 7,990 26%• Urban poor ~2 5% of urban 1991 4.13 9,997 39% population 2001 5.1 11,545 69%• 20 m/100m lack safe 2011 ~9 na na water/sanitation Sources: Census; Iyer et al (2007)
  6. 6. I. Role of Scenario-based Risk assessmentScenario-Based Risk Assessment considers: System performance over all plausible conditions, moves away from traditional “design event” approach Explicitly recognizes that uncertainty (lack of quantified probabilities) exists in the process and must be addressed through scenario analysis Relies upon two way communication with stakeholders to select the level of risk they can tolerate with consideration of tradeoffs of multidimensional costs vs safety Results in Robust Decisions – adaptation strategies that are least likely to fail
  7. 7. I Examples of DST: Urban Air pollution (Meerfert, Denmark) Motivation: Larsen et al (1997) found that mortality from traffic-related air pollution as high as that from accidentsJensen et al., 2001. A Danish decision-support GIS tool for management of urban air quality and humanexposures. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 6, 229-241.
  8. 8. I Examples of DST: Urban Air pollution (Meerfert, Denmark)
  9. 9. I Examples of DST: Urban Air pollution (Meerfert, Denmark) Air Quality Monitoring Forecasts Emissions inventory Elements of Air Pollution Information DSS Air Quality &Exposure to the public mapping Assessment of abatement measures Linking Environmental Quality to Public Health is key to public awareness & behavioral change, and should be an urban governance mandate
  10. 10. I Examples of DST: Broad St Cholera Outbreak, London 1854Linking Environmental Quality to Public Health :the beginnings of epidemiologyDr. John Snow mappedCholera outbreak to a single contaminated pump
  11. 11. I Examples of DST: Low-carbon developmenthttps://www.eureapa.net/ EUREAPAConsumption-based footprint of 45 countries, 57 sectors
  12. 12. I Examples of DST: Low-carbon development pathways
  13. 13. I Examples of DST: Low-carbon developmenthttps://eureapa.stage.isotoma.com/explore/
  14. 14. I. Examples of DST: Water Supply/Water Resources Management• Focus on increasing extraction and supply -> No comparative cost-benefit analysis of various options (scenarios) Installe -> Examples: d Present Projects Year Supply Bangalore Capacit y (MLD) (MLD) Chennai Delhi Arkavathy (TG Halli) 1933 149 60UTILITY PERFORMANCE Cauvery Stage I 1974 135 135• No city has 24/7 water supply Cauvery Stage II 1983 135 135• Poor often pay more for water Cauvery Stage III 1993 270 300• High leakage rates (20-60%) Cauvery Stage IV, 2002 270 270 Phase – I• Big cities: surface water supply from afar Total Supply 959 900• Small towns: groundwater• Electricity is >30% of costs• Inability to recover costs
  15. 15. Will retail Will thecustomers Will recreation remain Will groundwater Will hydropower management hydrology How willpractice compatible with future remain viable? change in response to shifts in the change? climateconservation? operations? Groundwater flow and market? Hydrology change?Demand side Recreational use surveys transport models Energy policy analysis with energy models with land Climatemodels with future projections sector forecast models use projections models 324643 Note: Image adapted with permission from the City of Portland, Oregon Water BureauHow much will new Will industrial Will this fish be listed Can we tap into a new Will agriculturecompete for sharedresidential discharges change? for protection? water supplies or become a potential supply?construction Regulatory and Habitat and species source? emerging lifecycle models with River hydraulic and Agricultural production models withincrease demand?Regional economic technology analysis Ecosystem contaminant transport water rights database
  16. 16. I Examples of DST: Integrated Water Resources Management Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) System ( www.weap21.org ) A generalized water resources software that provides flexible user- friendly interface to build custom applications A Decision Support Tool for Integrated, Comprehensive, Cross- Scale Water Management Planning Integrated : Hydrology with Priority-based Demand Allocation Comprehensive: Can include Equity, Environmental constraints, Financial Aspects, Water quality, Groundwater Cross-Scale: From a single house to a city to a riverbasin Ideal for ”What-if” scenario investigations for PLANNING and POLICY Analysis Management scenarios Climate change impacts
  17. 17. I. Example: Water Supply - Lake Victoria towns Lake Victoria region Masaka Bukoba Kisii Population 70,000 69,000 200,000 Streamflow 6.9 - - (106 m3) Water produced 2.35 0.9 (106 m3) Demand 80% 60% <50% coverage Operating Costs 496,000 USD 465,000 USD 726,000 USD Revenues 768,000 USD 470,000 USD 383,000 USD Key issues Waterworks Unaccounted Water Revenue<<Costs capacity, (UAW)~50%, high Very low population electricity costs coverage growth UAW~50%, high(1) To examine how climate, electriciity costsdemography and infrastructure Scenarios Investigatedimpacts water utility performance Infrastructure Increased Increased capacity, Increased capacity reduced EAW capacity, reducedin 3 east African towns EAW Demand 2% population 4% population 4% population growth and growth growth(2) To develop water resources climate-relatedmanagement tools that integrate demand modelabove aspects in a single platform Climate CCSM, Reduced rainfall None None
  18. 18. I. Example: Water Supply - Lake Victoria townsNABAJUZI watershed, Masaka
  19. 19. I. Example: Water Supply - Lake Victoria towns Results from Masaka, Uganda“…Hydrologic integration is necessary to evaluate the water availability andimpacts side of the water supply problem. Collection of the hydroclimaticdata needed in order to do the same, should be a priority for utilities andagencies in the LV region…”
  20. 20. II Barriers to Effective Decision Support Knowledge Gaps Communication Institutional Barriers Inclusion Financial Technical
  21. 21. II Barriers to Effective Decision Support Crucial Knowledge Gaps • Hydrology is rarely understood -> biophysical limits to water availability What is the natural water balance ? • Of both far-off source waters, of local water sources Ex: The resolution of groundwater monitoring (1 per 40-50 km2) is not enough for highly variable urban landscapes
  22. 22. II Barriers to Effective Decision SupportCrucial Knowledge Gaps• Changed hydrology of urban environments -> (biophysical impacts)What is the impacted water balance? • E.g. Elevated, and contaminated water tables (Seoul, Mulbagal, Bangalore) BWSSB supplies 900 MLD into the city from surface water that is not local to Bangalore Sekhar, M. and Kumar, M.S.M. 2009. “Geo-hydrological studies along the Metro Rail Alignment in Bangalore
  23. 23. II Barriers to Effective Decision SupportCrucial Knowledge Gaps• Extraction and Demand from each source remains unknown• Demand drivers for above across the social-economic spectrum • E.g. tankers, pvt borewells, local water bodies • How many wells? How much being pumped out? How much returning and where? • E.g. Chennai: 22-66% of water demand met by private wells
  24. 24. II Barriers to Effective Decision Support What can we do the in the meantime? AET Rain ~ 80% 100% Streamfl Surface watershed Example: Mulbagal ow ~ 10% Percolation (Rainfall Recharge) ~ 10% Net Groundwater Aquifer Groundwater discharge ~ 10%With Arghyam, IISc Aim: Impacts of population growth on GW depths; RWH, WWT, investment decisions
  25. 25. II Barriers to Effective Decision SupportWhat else can we do in the meantime?Room for innovation?• Public participation in data collection (e.g. OpenStreetMaps)• Crowdsourcing (e.g. Thailand flood)• Sensor Networkshttp://de21.digitalasia.chubu.ac.jp/floodmap/
  26. 26. III. Current Research Activity in Bangalore Key research questions: 1. What is the city-wide pattern of (water) resource availability? 2. What is the geographic distribution of (water) consumption? 3. What are the drivers that explain the pattern of water consumption observed? 4. What projections can we make for water demand and supply, as well as feedbacks to sources into the future? 5. What are the links and feedbacks to the biophysical system
  27. 27. III. Current Research Activity in BangaloreResearch Activities and Methods ..1. Household Water consumption survey Mental model for drivers of Quantity, source-mix
  28. 28. III. Current Research Activity in BangaloreResearch Activities and Methods…2. Understanding the biophysical resource:groundwater models, mass balances Groundwater –surface water models,3. Optimal monitoring density in urban mass balancesenvironmentsAdaptive sampling, Bayesian data fusion
  29. 29. III. Current Research Activity in BangaloreResearch Activities and Methods …4. Formal participatory planning exercises5. Urban Metabolic MappingGeospatial web-based planning platform Geospatial web toolsAn open-source application for - Information Communication - Web-based scenario-planning http://www.seimapping.org/bump/index.php http://seilinux.tccs.tufts.edu/~douglas/bump/index.php
  30. 30. Summary1. Decision Support Tools can be very valuable for comprehensive urban and regional planning2. These tools already exist; or can be built with scientific input3. Knowledge gaps limit the full potential of DST to be achieved – but progress can be made in parallel4. Intensive data-driven approaches will be necessary to fill knowledge gaps5. Urgent need for • Intensive environmental quality monitoring • Linkage between environmental quality and public health • Effective public participation and communication • Formal scenario-based planning for the future THANK YOU !
  31. 31. Extras
  32. 32. I. Some WEAP examplesWater Systems Planning Small Reservoirs Project, Ghana/Brazil California Water Plan, California, USA Guadiana River, SpainTransboundary Water Policy Okavango River, Angola/Namibia/Botswana Lower Rio Grande, USA/Mexico Mekong River, Thailand/Cambodia/Vietnam/Laos Jordan River, Syria/Israel/JordanClimate Change Studies Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins, California, USA Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Massachusetts, USA Yemen Second National Communication Mali Second National CommunicationEcological Flows Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Town of Scituate, Massachusetts, USAWater Utility DSS Application Portland, Oregon; Austin, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Towns in East Africa; Mulbagal, India.
  33. 33. WEAP Network Schematic GIS Tool Model Intuitive GIS-based graphical interfaceBuildingScenari oBuildingGraphs & Maps
  34. 34. Urban Water examples > Austin, TexasAim: Cost-effectiveness of conservationand reuse strategies vs increasing watertreatment capacity
  35. 35. Urban water examples>Portland, OregonAim: conjuctive use of SW and GW vs. building newreservoir

×