ICT and Climate Change: Quo Vadis?

 Kathmandu

 Bhanu Neupane
 Program Manager
 ICT & Sciences and Open Access to Scientific Research
 UNESCO, Paris


                                                         1
What have we already
           learned?

Concept of Green Economy
Various Applications
A few tools for Green Economy
Role of Youth
Other?....



                                2
Whose view matters most?

Experts
Yours
OURS           or?

THEIRS?


                            3
Marginalized people’s own view of poverty
Powerlessness - Lack of voice - Lack of independence


• The marginalized are subject to exploitation, humiliation
  and corruption
• Powerlessness reinforces their inability to affect changes
  to their situation
• Dependence on natural resource increases

Strategies must:
• Start with poor people‟s realities
• Build grassroots capacity to organize
• Work towards changing social norm
                                                      4
• Support social movements, innovation and leadership
Is there a positive correlation between
 poverty and environmental degradation

YES: Poverty increases environmental degradation.
Poverty raises the discount rate decreasing incentives to conserve with
reduced NPV of future benefits.
Examples of present value of $100 of future income:
   Discount   Year     Year     Year     Year    Year      Year
    rate: i     0       1         2       5       10        30
      0        100                100    100       100             100

     10        100      91        83     62         39             6
     25          100    80        64     33         11      0.1 = 10¢
Poverty:
  increases risk aversion,

  leads to ill health,

  reduces capacity to invest ,

  raises demand for children,             (Berkley group: 2010)          5
Environmental Degradation and
                    Poverty

•   Environmental degradation reduces the stock of natural
    capital and poor are disproportionately affected.
•   Environmental degradation increases vulnerability (e.g.
    soil erosion….decreased yields, deforestation…flooding).
•   Pollution increases morbidity and mortality (e.g.
    exposure to pesticides, contaminated water, indoor air
    pollution)
•   Deforestation and over-pumping increase the cost of
    basic goods such as firewood and drinking water
                                                             6
•   Erik Ekholm (losing grounds)
Sara Scherr 2000

Although the relationship between poverty
and environment is highly variable, the
„downward spiral‟ is both avoidable and
reversible in many circumstances. Poor
people have an unrecognized potential for
adaptation and innovation.”


                                            7
Poverty need not be a source of
          resource degradation

√ non-poor are the main source of degradation (big logging
    companies, livestock operations, over-consumption).
√   Traditional technologies are conservation friendly (agro-
    ecology, agroforestry).
√   Poor can adopt win-win technologies that raise incomes
    and increase conservation: ecoagriculture, ecotourism.
√   Cooperation/collective action in the management of
    Common Property Resources.
√   The poor can be environmental activists (Chipko
    movement in India, Chico Mendes rubber tappers in Brazil).
√   Markets for environmental services induce conservation by
    the poor
                                                        8
Opinion

A debate is healthy
Blame-games are not!




                       9
First message:

 Humans are changing the global
 environmental system in a globally-
 significant way
without…..
 adequate knowledge of the system and thus
 its response to change
Global change drivers

Population growth, movement and age
structures
Geo-political changes and realignments
Trade and subsidies




                                         U.S. Bureau of the Census
Technological changes
Climate change
12
13
14
Global change impacts
  • Global change is more than global climate variability/change
  • It has natural PLUS human/social dimensions
  • A constellation of changes, many global in domain

       For example, we see large changes in:




                                                                      Mackenzie et al (2002)




                                                                                                                 (1990)
                                                                                                                 Richards (1991), WRI
                                               Reid & Miller (1989)




NOAA                                                                                           Vitousek (1994)
From: Steffen et al. 2004
Four noteworthy trends …

1. The (continued) rise of the humans
  −   Increases in people, wealth and intellectual resources
      (brain power), leading to a ….
2. …. rise of demand
  ─   Increased demand for energy, food & natural resources
      resulting in accelerated ….
3. … increasing climate change &
   environmental impacts
4. … the rise of the machines (ICT).
   17
Rise of Machines

Within the context of climate change and
green econmy
 Are ICT Evil?
 Are ICT victim?

 Are ICT good?




                                           18
ICT as EVIL

Globally approx 2-3 % energy consumption is linked to
ICT usage
Energy demand for ICT is increasing at steady pace of
approx. 20%
Moore‟s law is also applicable for ICT-linked GHG
production
PCs & peripherals, Telecoms infrastructure
ICT use is increasing and so are GHG emissions from
ICT
 Other social and economic costs?                19
ICT as Victim

On an average 3 billion $ worth of ICT
linked infrastructures are damaged every
year due to climate-linked phenomena.




                                           20
ICT as solution

ICT provides mitigation opportunities
ICT help in abating carbon emission
ICT enhance efficiency & facilitate
conservation




                                        21
Mitigation opportunities

1.        Reducing GHG emissions from all stages of the ICT life
          cycle
          •   and especially during their production, use and disposal
2.        Making greater using ICT to mitigate vegetation related
          emissions
          •   through the greater use of ICT based earth observation and
              management systems and networks
3.        Encouraging the development and adoption of ICT
          based enabling technologies
          •   to reduce GHG emissions.


     22
ICT to abate carbon emission

   Reducing / substituting for travel
     In 2007, Telstra held 7‟500 video conferences saving 4‟200 tonnes of
       CO2
   Flexible work arrangements
     Each one million EU workers could save one million tonnes of CO2
       annually by telecommuting
   Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS)
     In-car systems to assist in “eco-driving” can reduce CO2 emissions by
       up to 20 per cent
   Dematerialization (replacing atoms with bits)
   Publications on-line save hundreds of tonnes of paper and significantly
     reduces CO2 emissions annually compared with printing and distribution
     of paper copies                                                        2
                                                                            3
Sources: Climate Risk report for Telstra, ETNO/WWF report, Toyota, ITU
ICT enhance efficiency &
       facilitate conservation by :
Process efficiency
     Doing things fast
     Use less energy  emit less C
Connecting everything & everyone:
     Instrumenting objects and places around us:
     Empowering people to act
Measuring everything (& everyone!):
     The Internet of Things
     More info on energy use
 24
ICT enhance efficiency &
         facilitate conservation by:
Controlling everything
        Smart controls
        Connect & control all motors & energy consumption
         (embedded controls)
More options to reduce consumption: smart
motors, lighting, grid, buildings, logistics
/transport & cities



25
ICT and Climate Change

    Mitigation                   Strategy                  Adaptation
    (Causes)                                                (Effects)

     Physical
                                e-Enabled:           Application Areas / CC
   Consumption            -Carbon Markets            Related Vulnerabilities
-Dematerialisation of     -Decision-Making          -Socio-Polítical
  Goods/Services          -Policy Networks          -Livelihoods & Finance
Journey Substitution      -Awareness/Capacity-      -Health
                          Building                  -Habitat
       Physical
                          -Technology Transfer      -Food (Agriculture)
     Production
-Shift to Knowledge                                 -Water
Economy

Energy Generation
  & Distribution                                      ICT Adaptation Role
-Smart Power/Grid                                   -Measuring
                                Monitoring          -Informing & Networking
                                                    -Deciding:
    Energy Use            -CC   Data Capture         •Predicting (Risk, Early
Manufacture & Use:                                   Warning)
                          -CC   Data Processing
-ICT (Green vs.                                      •Planning (inc. Local
                          -CC   Data Presentation
Brown IT)                 and   Dissemination
                                                     Mitigation)
-Smart                                               •Coping (Short-Term/
                                                     Disaster)
Motors/Logistics
                                                     •Adapting (Long-Term)
-Smart Building                                     -Transacting
Design                                              -Producing
-Smart Transport                                    -Mobility
ICT and Climate Change
  Role of ICT             ICT Intervention Focus



                  Initial/Generic Awareness of Climate Change
Climate Change    Specific Awareness of Local Issues
 AWARENESS



                  Natural Resource-Oriented:
Climate Change   -Forest Management
                 -Agriculture Management
 MITIGATION      -Land Evaluation and Use
                  Capacity-Building Oriented



Climate Change    External Data
 MONITORING       Local Data
                  Hybrid Local-External Systems




                  Vulnerability-Oriented:
Climate Change   -Food + Water Security
 ADAPTATION      -Income Generation
                 -Health
                 -Infrastructure
                 -Political Participation
                 -Security
                  Climatic Threat-Oriented
                                                      Ospina & Heeks (2012)
Let us look at some cool
        innovations?
Digitization &             The Internet of Things
dematerialization          (IOT)
Microprocessors            Sensor technology
Handhelds vs desk/lap      Web 2.0 & 3.0
tops                       Social networking
Internet diffusion         Improved & greener
Broadband                  batteries
Cloud computing            GIS & visualization
Cyber physical systems     technologies
Wireless & mobile device
                                                    28
But can we be complacent?

Lets take an example!

Water




                             29
Linking climate Change with
 Water Resources - Impacts?
Intensification of hydrological cycle –
increased floods and droughts
Changes to global distribution of
precipitation – increased rainfall in high
latitudes, decreases in tropics
But:
 Global Climate Models are very poor at
  representing hydrological systems
 Regional and local effects are highly uncertain
 Models provide grid-square average and don‟t
  provide a comprehensive picture of the system30
Water resources
                          P
                      I       Es        Eo
                                                 E = I+T+Eo+Es
                    T
                                                 Stocks:
 first separation point            Qs
                                             Q        Ss (surface)
                          F
                                     Qg               Su (soil)
second separation point
                      C   R                            Sw+g
                                                       (waterbodies+
                                                       groundwater)
      P = rainfall                 R = percolation
       I = interception            C = capillary rise
      Qs = overland flow           Es = soil evaporation
      F = infiltration             Qg = seepage
      T = transpiration            Eo = open water evaporation
Lack of information and data
at a time when we need it more than ever to deal with
increasing complexity – where is ICT?




  GRDC: Current stations in historical database indicated by time series end
Lack of finer-scale measurements of
        water cycle components in the Third
                  Pole Environment
                                IPCC “… Working Group II contribution
                                to the underlying assessment refers to
                                poorly substantiated estimates of
                                rate of recession and date for the
                                disappearance of Himalayan
                                glaciers.” (IPCC statement on the melting of Himalayan
                                glaciers, 20 Jan. 2010).

 There is a critical lack of knowledge for this unique
  environment, because, current estimates of the plateau water
  balance rely at best on sparse and scarce observations
 In-situ observation data cannot provide the required accuracy,
  spatial density and temporal frequency for quantification of impacts
  and development of adaptation and mitigation measures.
                                                                                  33
CURRENT




36




      FUTURE
So are we still at the square
            ONE?

Quo Vadis ICT?




                                 37
Let us now take ICT’s impact
       on poor people!




                           38
Assumption:
ICT can help the marginalized
•   to make informed decisions
•   to better organise themselves
•   to communicate their interests
•   to break down their isolation and structures of
    discrimination
•   to support economic and social innovation that benefit
    them
•   ICT can improve the efficiency and responsiveness of
    groups that work with the marginalized
                                                      39
Engaging the marginalized:
         obstacles to overcome
• Lack of access (infrastructure)

• High cost of access (when available)

• Lack of spare time and mobility

• Lack of IT literacy

• Lack of relevant content in vernacular languages

• Lack of inclusive access models focused on the
  poor and marginalized
                                                40
Engaging the marginalized:
        obstacles to overcome

• Lack of enabling policies and strategies
• Knowledge Infomediaries
• Content Appropriateness
• Multi-stakeholder Engagement
• New and Traditional Knowledge
• Focus on the Information Chain

                                             41
Again are we still at the
        square ONE?

Quo Vadis ICT?




                               42
UNESCO’s initiatives

•   Putting ICT in the hands of the poor
•   Develop innovative solutions for the marginalized, isolated and
    disadvantaged
•   Empower people living in poverty, especially women and youth
•   Develop replicable models through mixing and matching traditional and
    new media technologies
•   Assess impact and readjust the methodologies through action research
•   Use of Cyber physical systems
•   Open Data
•   Open Access to Scientific research
•   Open source softwares
•   Social networks (Possible   future?)
                                                                   43
Take Home Messages

• Technology is only part of the solution.
• Relevant innovation is driven locally.
• Green economy doesn‟t mean to buy its way out of
  environmental problems.
• Creating trust helps to secure the license to
  operate.
• Anticipate risks that stem from outside the existing
  system.

                                                  44
In conclusion:

You are a mass of 1.06 billion strong!
You are most ICT educated and enabled
mass (75% have access to mobile)
Change will be possible ONLY when you are
mobilized.
My big boss Mr. Ban Ki Moon has thus said:
  “You have the opportunity to change our world.
                    Seize it.”
                                             45
Thank you~



    b.neupane@unesco.org

                           46

B.neupane september 27

  • 1.
    ICT and ClimateChange: Quo Vadis? Kathmandu Bhanu Neupane Program Manager ICT & Sciences and Open Access to Scientific Research UNESCO, Paris 1
  • 2.
    What have wealready learned? Concept of Green Economy Various Applications A few tools for Green Economy Role of Youth Other?.... 2
  • 3.
    Whose view mattersmost? Experts Yours OURS or? THEIRS? 3
  • 4.
    Marginalized people’s ownview of poverty Powerlessness - Lack of voice - Lack of independence • The marginalized are subject to exploitation, humiliation and corruption • Powerlessness reinforces their inability to affect changes to their situation • Dependence on natural resource increases Strategies must: • Start with poor people‟s realities • Build grassroots capacity to organize • Work towards changing social norm 4 • Support social movements, innovation and leadership
  • 5.
    Is there apositive correlation between poverty and environmental degradation YES: Poverty increases environmental degradation. Poverty raises the discount rate decreasing incentives to conserve with reduced NPV of future benefits. Examples of present value of $100 of future income: Discount Year Year Year Year Year Year rate: i 0 1 2 5 10 30 0 100 100 100 100 100 10 100 91 83 62 39 6 25 100 80 64 33 11 0.1 = 10¢ Poverty:  increases risk aversion,  leads to ill health,  reduces capacity to invest ,  raises demand for children, (Berkley group: 2010) 5
  • 6.
    Environmental Degradation and Poverty • Environmental degradation reduces the stock of natural capital and poor are disproportionately affected. • Environmental degradation increases vulnerability (e.g. soil erosion….decreased yields, deforestation…flooding). • Pollution increases morbidity and mortality (e.g. exposure to pesticides, contaminated water, indoor air pollution) • Deforestation and over-pumping increase the cost of basic goods such as firewood and drinking water 6 • Erik Ekholm (losing grounds)
  • 7.
    Sara Scherr 2000 Althoughthe relationship between poverty and environment is highly variable, the „downward spiral‟ is both avoidable and reversible in many circumstances. Poor people have an unrecognized potential for adaptation and innovation.” 7
  • 8.
    Poverty need notbe a source of resource degradation √ non-poor are the main source of degradation (big logging companies, livestock operations, over-consumption). √ Traditional technologies are conservation friendly (agro- ecology, agroforestry). √ Poor can adopt win-win technologies that raise incomes and increase conservation: ecoagriculture, ecotourism. √ Cooperation/collective action in the management of Common Property Resources. √ The poor can be environmental activists (Chipko movement in India, Chico Mendes rubber tappers in Brazil). √ Markets for environmental services induce conservation by the poor 8
  • 9.
    Opinion A debate ishealthy Blame-games are not! 9
  • 10.
    First message: Humansare changing the global environmental system in a globally- significant way without….. adequate knowledge of the system and thus its response to change
  • 11.
    Global change drivers Populationgrowth, movement and age structures Geo-political changes and realignments Trade and subsidies U.S. Bureau of the Census Technological changes Climate change
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Global change impacts • Global change is more than global climate variability/change • It has natural PLUS human/social dimensions • A constellation of changes, many global in domain For example, we see large changes in: Mackenzie et al (2002) (1990) Richards (1991), WRI Reid & Miller (1989) NOAA Vitousek (1994)
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Four noteworthy trends… 1. The (continued) rise of the humans − Increases in people, wealth and intellectual resources (brain power), leading to a …. 2. …. rise of demand ─ Increased demand for energy, food & natural resources resulting in accelerated …. 3. … increasing climate change & environmental impacts 4. … the rise of the machines (ICT). 17
  • 18.
    Rise of Machines Withinthe context of climate change and green econmy  Are ICT Evil?  Are ICT victim?  Are ICT good? 18
  • 19.
    ICT as EVIL Globallyapprox 2-3 % energy consumption is linked to ICT usage Energy demand for ICT is increasing at steady pace of approx. 20% Moore‟s law is also applicable for ICT-linked GHG production PCs & peripherals, Telecoms infrastructure ICT use is increasing and so are GHG emissions from ICT  Other social and economic costs? 19
  • 20.
    ICT as Victim Onan average 3 billion $ worth of ICT linked infrastructures are damaged every year due to climate-linked phenomena. 20
  • 21.
    ICT as solution ICTprovides mitigation opportunities ICT help in abating carbon emission ICT enhance efficiency & facilitate conservation 21
  • 22.
    Mitigation opportunities 1. Reducing GHG emissions from all stages of the ICT life cycle • and especially during their production, use and disposal 2. Making greater using ICT to mitigate vegetation related emissions • through the greater use of ICT based earth observation and management systems and networks 3. Encouraging the development and adoption of ICT based enabling technologies • to reduce GHG emissions. 22
  • 23.
    ICT to abatecarbon emission Reducing / substituting for travel  In 2007, Telstra held 7‟500 video conferences saving 4‟200 tonnes of CO2 Flexible work arrangements  Each one million EU workers could save one million tonnes of CO2 annually by telecommuting Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS)  In-car systems to assist in “eco-driving” can reduce CO2 emissions by up to 20 per cent Dematerialization (replacing atoms with bits)  Publications on-line save hundreds of tonnes of paper and significantly reduces CO2 emissions annually compared with printing and distribution of paper copies 2 3 Sources: Climate Risk report for Telstra, ETNO/WWF report, Toyota, ITU
  • 24.
    ICT enhance efficiency& facilitate conservation by : Process efficiency  Doing things fast  Use less energy  emit less C Connecting everything & everyone:  Instrumenting objects and places around us:  Empowering people to act Measuring everything (& everyone!):  The Internet of Things  More info on energy use 24
  • 25.
    ICT enhance efficiency& facilitate conservation by: Controlling everything  Smart controls  Connect & control all motors & energy consumption (embedded controls) More options to reduce consumption: smart motors, lighting, grid, buildings, logistics /transport & cities 25
  • 26.
    ICT and ClimateChange Mitigation Strategy Adaptation (Causes) (Effects) Physical e-Enabled: Application Areas / CC Consumption -Carbon Markets Related Vulnerabilities -Dematerialisation of -Decision-Making -Socio-Polítical Goods/Services -Policy Networks -Livelihoods & Finance Journey Substitution -Awareness/Capacity- -Health Building -Habitat Physical -Technology Transfer -Food (Agriculture) Production -Shift to Knowledge -Water Economy Energy Generation & Distribution ICT Adaptation Role -Smart Power/Grid -Measuring Monitoring -Informing & Networking -Deciding: Energy Use -CC Data Capture •Predicting (Risk, Early Manufacture & Use: Warning) -CC Data Processing -ICT (Green vs. •Planning (inc. Local -CC Data Presentation Brown IT) and Dissemination Mitigation) -Smart •Coping (Short-Term/ Disaster) Motors/Logistics •Adapting (Long-Term) -Smart Building -Transacting Design -Producing -Smart Transport -Mobility
  • 27.
    ICT and ClimateChange Role of ICT ICT Intervention Focus  Initial/Generic Awareness of Climate Change Climate Change  Specific Awareness of Local Issues AWARENESS  Natural Resource-Oriented: Climate Change -Forest Management -Agriculture Management MITIGATION -Land Evaluation and Use  Capacity-Building Oriented Climate Change  External Data MONITORING  Local Data  Hybrid Local-External Systems  Vulnerability-Oriented: Climate Change -Food + Water Security ADAPTATION -Income Generation -Health -Infrastructure -Political Participation -Security  Climatic Threat-Oriented Ospina & Heeks (2012)
  • 28.
    Let us lookat some cool innovations? Digitization & The Internet of Things dematerialization (IOT) Microprocessors Sensor technology Handhelds vs desk/lap Web 2.0 & 3.0 tops Social networking Internet diffusion Improved & greener Broadband batteries Cloud computing GIS & visualization Cyber physical systems technologies Wireless & mobile device 28
  • 29.
    But can webe complacent? Lets take an example! Water 29
  • 30.
    Linking climate Changewith Water Resources - Impacts? Intensification of hydrological cycle – increased floods and droughts Changes to global distribution of precipitation – increased rainfall in high latitudes, decreases in tropics But:  Global Climate Models are very poor at representing hydrological systems  Regional and local effects are highly uncertain  Models provide grid-square average and don‟t provide a comprehensive picture of the system30
  • 31.
    Water resources P I Es Eo E = I+T+Eo+Es T Stocks: first separation point Qs Q Ss (surface) F Qg Su (soil) second separation point C R Sw+g (waterbodies+ groundwater) P = rainfall R = percolation I = interception C = capillary rise Qs = overland flow Es = soil evaporation F = infiltration Qg = seepage T = transpiration Eo = open water evaporation
  • 32.
    Lack of informationand data at a time when we need it more than ever to deal with increasing complexity – where is ICT? GRDC: Current stations in historical database indicated by time series end
  • 33.
    Lack of finer-scalemeasurements of water cycle components in the Third Pole Environment IPCC “… Working Group II contribution to the underlying assessment refers to poorly substantiated estimates of rate of recession and date for the disappearance of Himalayan glaciers.” (IPCC statement on the melting of Himalayan glaciers, 20 Jan. 2010).  There is a critical lack of knowledge for this unique environment, because, current estimates of the plateau water balance rely at best on sparse and scarce observations  In-situ observation data cannot provide the required accuracy, spatial density and temporal frequency for quantification of impacts and development of adaptation and mitigation measures. 33
  • 36.
  • 37.
    So are westill at the square ONE? Quo Vadis ICT? 37
  • 38.
    Let us nowtake ICT’s impact on poor people! 38
  • 39.
    Assumption: ICT can helpthe marginalized • to make informed decisions • to better organise themselves • to communicate their interests • to break down their isolation and structures of discrimination • to support economic and social innovation that benefit them • ICT can improve the efficiency and responsiveness of groups that work with the marginalized 39
  • 40.
    Engaging the marginalized: obstacles to overcome • Lack of access (infrastructure) • High cost of access (when available) • Lack of spare time and mobility • Lack of IT literacy • Lack of relevant content in vernacular languages • Lack of inclusive access models focused on the poor and marginalized 40
  • 41.
    Engaging the marginalized: obstacles to overcome • Lack of enabling policies and strategies • Knowledge Infomediaries • Content Appropriateness • Multi-stakeholder Engagement • New and Traditional Knowledge • Focus on the Information Chain 41
  • 42.
    Again are westill at the square ONE? Quo Vadis ICT? 42
  • 43.
    UNESCO’s initiatives • Putting ICT in the hands of the poor • Develop innovative solutions for the marginalized, isolated and disadvantaged • Empower people living in poverty, especially women and youth • Develop replicable models through mixing and matching traditional and new media technologies • Assess impact and readjust the methodologies through action research • Use of Cyber physical systems • Open Data • Open Access to Scientific research • Open source softwares • Social networks (Possible future?) 43
  • 44.
    Take Home Messages •Technology is only part of the solution. • Relevant innovation is driven locally. • Green economy doesn‟t mean to buy its way out of environmental problems. • Creating trust helps to secure the license to operate. • Anticipate risks that stem from outside the existing system. 44
  • 45.
    In conclusion: You area mass of 1.06 billion strong! You are most ICT educated and enabled mass (75% have access to mobile) Change will be possible ONLY when you are mobilized. My big boss Mr. Ban Ki Moon has thus said: “You have the opportunity to change our world. Seize it.” 45
  • 46.
    Thank you~ b.neupane@unesco.org 46