A Detailed presentation on cause effect diagram(fish bone diagram),It focuses on the causes and effects with reference to poor placements.
Submitted by rashi and twinkle singhal.
1. QIMPRO
CHALLENGE - 3
CAUSE EFFECT DIAGRAM
(POOR PLACEMENT )
SUBMITTED BY:
RASHI (B.TECH (CS) 2ND
YEAR )
TWINKLE SINGHAL (B.TECH (CS) 2ND
YEAR )
2. CAUSE-EFFECT DIAGRAM
Also called Ishikawa diagram or fish-bone
diagram.
Developed by Kaoru Ishikawa, in 1960.
Tool for looking at effects & causes in a
systematic way.
Helps in determining the root causes of a
problem.
Encourage group participation and utilizes group
knowledge of the process, identifies areas where
data should be collected for further study.
3. The design of the diagram looks like the
skeleton of the fish ,so named as “fish-bone
diagram”.
The basic structure of the cause-effect
diagram is :
EFFECTS
CAUSES
4. For the problem solved using fish-bone
diagram, it must fulfill the following conditions :
it must be characterized by risk , meaning that the
probability of occurrence and its impact can be
determined.
it must be a management objective with operational
valence; the causes producing it must be characterized
by probability, possibility or frequency of occurrence.
In turn, main causes must be also considered as effects
(secondary or of second order) and sub-causes, named
side-effects and which represent the causes of the
secondary effects, must fulfill the same conditions as the
main causes.
there must not exist bijective correlations, meaning the
effect must not turn into its cause, regardless the
positioning on the diagram.
5. a priority criteria or a certain sequence in time (chronology) or a certain probability,
possibility or frequency of occurrence can be identified.
main causes may or may not have one or more secondary causes. if the question,
the belonging of these causes can be identified: endogenous to the system
which the effect characterized by risk belongs or exogenous to the system
(belonging to the environment).
the number of main and secondary causes must be reasonable, usually not over 7-9
for main causes and 2-3 for the secondary causes of a main cause.
main and secondary causes must be representative and should allow monitoring or
even management (can be sustained or fined through measures).
names given must be representative and suggestive for the relation cause-effect,
and at the same time it should be able to be characterized by risks which enroll in
the cause’s relevance.
6. POOR PLACEMENTS
Placement committees lie to
many companies
Lack of right applicants
Adverse market condition Quota system and other
government policies
Due to
Scheduling
of
other
companies
Less
efficiency
of
students
Unavail-
-ability
of full
batch
Absence
of
placed
students
Less
efficient
student
education
program
Personal
affairs
Low
industrial
outputInflation
of
market
condition
Light
turmoil
Encour
-aging
literacy
rate
Protest
and
rallies
Uplift
ment
Of
backward
classes
Bad PPO
policies
To abolish
caste system
Stockers
Some people
Don't want a
Wandering life
7. Company professionals blacklist
the institution
Lack of desired job
Lack of adequate provision
for job creation
Difficulty in making
company’s mind for
recruitment
Under-
qualified
job seeker
Bad
Presenta
-tion
During
interviewHigh
production
Of
graduatesLow
absorbing
capacity
of the
labor
market
High
wage
required
low
demand
of labor
Recession
During
The
Placement
year
Due to
Lies of
The
institution
Laziness
Of the
Previous
Placed students
Malicious
Behavior
of the
Placed
students
Unavailability
Of the
Full batch Lack of
Right
skills Large number
Of extra ordinary
studentsFurther study
Doing
research Doing
Post –
graduation Developing
software Craze of
collecting
degreesSet up own business
First
Visit
Of
The
company
Lack of
Knowledge
About
The
institute
Adding
A new
Institute
In the list
Bad image
Of the
institute
Don't
Want
to
job
Family
business
Don’t
be
slave
High attitude
8. ROOT CAUSES:
Bad placement policy:
It is the single biggest factor leading to poor
placement. The students really has no choice
to sit back, think or explore his/her options.
And out of desperation and insecurity
students end up applying to whichever
companies turn up first so that a job is
“secured”.
100% placement obsession means you have
bad PPO policies. On most campuses, you
are kicked out of the process as soon as you
get a PPO. There is no question of
9. Placement committees lie to companies:
It is a known fact that placement committees
lie to many companies ,this feedback
received from many recruiters and aluminize.
All companies want access to the best talent
and hence want to show up first on campus.
Students and committees try to game the
system by lying to recruiters about schedule
of the placement season.
Recruiters try to gain the system by arm
twisting campuses who have great talent but
have little bargaining capacity.
10. Adverse market condition:
Adverse market condition directly effect to
the placement .
Low industrial output, confusion about the
market condition,
lightly turmoil in the market in the wake of the
indecisiveness on policies because of the
upcoming elections are said to be some of
the reason behind weak economy.
11. RECOMMEDATION:
Students should be allow to sit in any number of
companies to test their ability.
Full batch should be available to all companies,
especially to those who demand it.
Image of the present condition of the university
and college should be clear to the companies.
Students should be given pre-knowledge about
the aptitude test , interview taken by the
companies.
Companies should not blacklist any institution.
12. Lesson learned:
Bad placement is not only because of
students, it depends on various other factors
like university policies, government,
companies itself etc.
Student should not be hopeless during the
interview.
Interviewee should ask some easy questions
in the starting to make the environment
friendly.
