SlideShare a Scribd company logo
REPORT ON PROGRAMMING
FIELD IN VIETNAM
Research time: 4th – 20th May 2013
Based on Vinaresearch’s panellist

Date: 22nd May 2013
Creator: W&S Group
Table of content
A – Executive Summary
B – Research Information
C – Research Findings
D – Member Profile

1~4
5~6
6 ~ 42
43 ~ 44
A. Executive summary
[1] Game programming is rather not popular
•

29.3% of 443 respondents did not work on Game programming. In terms of frequency degree, System
analyzing is at the top as it gained average score of 4.04. The next ones are System Administration and
Research & Development.

•

Frequency of working on System analyzing is at the top with mean of 4.06 in male group and 4.00 in
female group.

The second field was System administration in male group and Research &

Development in female one.
•

As the Figure 1.3 showed below, mean of Research & Development and System analyzing is very close
in 25 – 29 years old group. In the other words, both of these fields were preferred by this group. For the
other age groups, System analyzing was outstanding compared to other fields.

[2] 82.3% respondents worked as a full-time employee
•

82.3% of 243 respondents who are working in programming fields were Full-time employees.
However, there was 17.7% working on outsourced projects only.

•

Upon 10 males / females were asked, there was more than 8 persons working as Full-time employee.

•

Generally, percentage of Full-time employees was higher than Only work as freelancer. However, this
numerical data was not consensus among age groups.
A. Executive summary
[3] FPT was mostly chosen, accounting for 37.5%
•

Upon 10 respondents were asked, there was nearly 4 persons working for FPT. The following were Viettel
and Vinagame (VNG) with 8.5% and 4.5% respectively. Besides, there was 29.0% respondents working
for small and medium companies in Vietnam.

•

38.9% male respondents and 33.3% female ones worked for FPT. Besides, there was more than 20%
working for small and medium companies.

•

All age groups worked for FPT, respectively accounting for 48.1%, 24.1% and 28.6% for each group. In
addition, percentage of working for small and medium companies was rather high.

[4] FPT was the first choice for freelanced programmers
•

37.2% of 43 respondents working as a freelancer did outsourced projects for FPT. The following are
Viettel and Quang Trung Software, respectively accounting for 20.9% and 16.3%. Besides, there were
34.9% receiving projects from smaller companies or through relationship.
A. Executive summary
[5] Nearly 70% respondents used Window platform
•

The result pointed out that Window was the most popular platform that mostly used by 68.7%
respondents. Web is the second platform with 55.6%. Besides, there ware some platforms which have not
been very popular in Vietnam such as Symbian, Palm / WebOS, RIM or Bada.

•

Window was reported as the most popular platform in both gender groups, respectively accounting for
68.0% of male respondents and 71.0% of female ones. Being opposite of Window, not only male but also
female group did not choose Bada as their regular platforms.

•

Window was reported as the most popular platform in all age groups. The next ones were Web and Java.
No respondent in all groups chose Bada as their regular platforms.

[6] 40.7% respondents used Window most often
•

37.2% of 43 respondents working as a freelancer did outsourced projects for FPT. The following are
Viettel and Quang Trung Software, respectively accounting for 20.9% and 16.3%. Besides, there were
34.9% receiving projects from smaller companies or through relationship.

•

Window, Web and Android were used most often in both male and female group. In particular, Window
was at the top with 38.1% of male respondents and 46.8% of female ones.

•

All age groups used Window as their main platform. The following ones were Web, Android and Java. In
particular, Java seemed to be more preferable in the group of 30 years old and over, accounting for
21.7%..
A. Executive summary
[7] Android and Cloud Computing achieved high potentiality
•

For mobile, Android was predicted to be applied mostly, account for 40.3%. The next one was Window
Phone with 35.0%. For computer, Cloud Computing was perceived as the most potential platform by
44.4% respondents. The second position belonged to Window, accounting for 36.2%.

•

Both male and female group agreed that Android was the highest potential platform for Mobile and Cloud
Computing was for Computer in the future. The second one for Mobile phone was Window Phone and
for Computer was Window.

•

For mobile, while the group of 20 – 24 years old thought that Android would be the highest
potentiality, the others voted Window Phone as the mot potential platform. For Computer, Cloud
Computing was mostly chosen by the groups of 25 – 29 years old and 30 years old and over. Not as those
groups, the youngest group preferred Window.

[8] Java was the most popular programming language, accounting for
58.4%
•

Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons using Java. The next languages were HTML
, C# and C++ with 53.5%, 52.3% and 51.9% respectively.

•

More than 50% of male and female group used Java regularly. The following platform chosen by 56.9%
male respondents was C++ and female ones voted for HTML, accounting for 51.6%.

•

Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons in the group of 20 – 24 years old using C++.
However, this language was not so popular as Java in the older groups.
A. Executive summary
[9] Java and C# were the languages used most often
•

There was 27.2% respondents using Java as their regular programming language. The next one is C# and
C++, respectively accounting for 24.3% and 19.3%. Also, the result also showed that less respondents
used VB.net as their main language.

•

As the graph was shown in Figure 9.2, Java was more preferable than other languages in female group.
Not only using Java, male respondents also used C# regularly that was proved by seemingly close
percentages.

•

The group of 30 years old and over especially liked to use Java more than the other
languages, accounting for 41.3%. Besides Java, the group of 20 – 24 years old also preferred C# and
C++. Not as those two groups, respondents aged 25 – 29 years old mostly voted for C# with 33.3%.

[10] 72.9% agreed that HTML was the most popular language
•

HTML was voted as the most common language by 72.9% respondents. The following one were Java and
PHP, respectively accounting for 72.8% and 66.6%.

•

Both males and females rated the highest score for HTML. The second programming language was Java
with the score of 3.92 in male group and 4.00 in female ones.

•

Respondents aged 25 – 29 years old agreed that Java was the most popular. In contrast, the most popular
programming language in groups of 20 – 24 years old and 30 years old and over was HTML, respectively
score of 4.04 and 3.87.
A. Executive summary
[11] Nearly 90% respondents knew CLOUD COMPUTING
•

Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 9 persons knowing about Clouding Computing. In
particular, 26.7% respondents knew it clearly.

•

Both male and female group knew about Cloud Computing with high percent of more than 85%. In
particular, over 25% of both male and female respondents knew clearly about Cloud Computing.

•

Cloud Computing was well-recognized by all age groups, respectively accounting for 92%, 85% and
86.9%. In particular, the percentage of Know clearly was very high which was more than 20%.

[12] Cloud Computing was assessed to be popular in Vietnam
•

There was about 47% respondents agreeing that Cloud Computing was popular in Vietnam.
However, 28% of 229 knowing about Cloud Computing thought that it had not been very popular in
Vietnam.

•

50% of male respondents agreed that Cloud Computing was Popular in Vietnam while female ones was
not sure about the popularity of Cloud Computing.

•

Cloud Computing was supposed to be popular platform in Vietnam by all age groups.
A. Executive summary
[13] There were some specific reasons for Cloud Computing
popularity
•

For respondents who agreed that Cloud Computing was popular, Widely share resources was the top
reason they gave out. Meanwhile, New platform and not commonly used was picked from the list of
reasons why Cloud Computing is not very popular in Vietnam.

[14] Google App Engine was mostly known by 65.5% respondents.
•

When asking 229 respondents, there was 65.5% of them knowing about Google App Engine. The next
ones are Microsoft Azure, Blue Cloud and Cloud Sites, respectively accounting for 52.8%, 48.0% and
46.3%.
B. Research information
Research method

: Quantitative – Online research

Timing

: 4th – 20th May 2013

Sample size

: 243

Research area

: Nationwide

Target

: Working in Programming field

Research objectives : 1. Explore popular platforms and languages
2. Popularity of Cloud Computing in Vietnam
Sampling method

: Convenience sampling
C – Research Findings
1. Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT
Game programming is rather not popular
29.3% of 443 respondents did not work on Game programming. In terms of frequency degree, System analyzing is at
the top as it gained average score of 4.04. The next ones are System Administration and Research & Development.

[Figure 1.1] Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT

Unit: %

Never

12.6

15.6

Very rarely

Rarely

8.1

Sometimes

Often

Very often

14.9

14.5

26.7

26.0

23.6

26.0

16.3

10.8
26.5

21.0

26.2

18.6

15.6

24.7

28.2

26.8
14.8

19.5

8.6
14.7

6.0

29.3
19.1

Application
programming

Mean

14.9
Web programming

3.68

3.77

Game programming

2.97

8.4

7.5

6.5

11.8

8.2

13.7

12.3

10.8

System administration

Research &
Development

System analyzing

3.90

Q. Please tell us how often you work these following jobs? [Matrix MA] Based n=443

3.89

11.5

4.04
1. Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT
Both male and female group worked on System analyzing often
Frequency of working on System analyzing is at the top with mean of 4.06 in male group and 4.00 in female group. The
second field was System administration in male group and Research & Development in female one.

[Figure 1.2] Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT – By Gender
Male
(n=293)

Never

Very rarely

Rarely

Sometimes

Female
(n=126)

Often

Very often

Mean

Never

Very rarely

Rarely

Sometimes

Often

Very often

Mean

Application programming

16.4%

5.1%

15.4%

20.8%

28.7%

13.7%

3.81

25.4%

7.9%

13.5%

21.4%

21.4%

10.3%

3.37

Web programming

12.1%

9.0%

19.7%

15.9%

28.3%

15.2%

3.85

21.4%

6.3%

19.0%

15.1%

21.4%

16.7%

3.59

Game programming

24.2%

8.1%

27.0%

20.7%

11.6%

8.4%

3.13

41.1%

9.7%

19.4%

13.7%

8.9%

7.3%

2.61

9.0%

7.6%

14.2%

27.0%

27.3%

14.9%

4.01

18.1%

10.2%

15.7%

15.7%

25.2%

15.0%

3.65

Research & Development

10.7%

8.3%

15.2%

26.9%

24.5%

14.5%

3.90

16.0%

5.6%

10.4%

24.0%

29.6%

14.4%

3.89

System analyzing

10.3%

6.5%

12.4%

24.7%

29.9%

16.2%

4.06

11.8%

6.3%

9.4%

31.5%

24.4%

16.5%

4.00

System administration

Q. Please tell us how often you work these following jobs? [Matrix MA] Based n=443
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=443
1. Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT
Research & Development and System analyzing were chosen by group of
25 – 29 years old
As the Figure 1.3 showed below, mean of Research & Development and System analyzing is very close in 25 – 29
years old group. In the other words, both of these fields were preferred by this group. For the other age groups, System
analyzing was outstanding compared to other fields.

[Figure 1.3] Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT – By Age

Age Group

Application
Web
Game
System
Research &
programming programming programming administration Development

System
analyzing

Total

3.68

3.77

2.97

3.90

3.89

4.04

20 - 24 years old (n=213)

3.73

3.97

3.26

3.90

3.88

4.09

25 - 29 years old (n=136)

3.44

3.54

2.53

3.78

3.84

3.83

30 years old and over (n=84)

3.93

3.62

2.94

4.08

4.03

4.25

Q. Please tell us how often you work these following jobs? [Matrix MA] Based n=443
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=443
2. Job’s characteristics
82.3% respondents worked as a full-time employee
82.3% of 243 respondents who are working in programming fields were Full-time employees. However, there was
17.7% working on outsourced projects only.

Unit: %

[Figure 2.1] Job’s characteristics
Only work as freelancer

Full-time employee

17.7

82.3

Q. Please tell us characteristics of your current job? [SA] Based n=243
2. Job’s characteristics
82.3% male and female respondents worked as a full-time employee
Upon 10 males / females were asked, there was more than 8 persons working as Full-time employee.

[Figure 2.2] Job’s characteristics – By Gender

Unit: %

Only work as freelancer

Full-time employee

Only work as freelancer

Full-time employee

17.7

17.7

82.3

82.3

Male
(n=181)
Q. Please tell us characteristics of your current job? [SA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243

Female
(n=62)
2. Job’s characteristics
Percentage of full-time employees was higher in three groups.
Generally, percentage of Full-time employees was higher than Only work as freelancer. However, this numerical data
was not consensus among age groups.

[Figure 2.3] Job’s characteristics – By Age

Unit: %

Only work as freelancer

Full-time employee

8.7

10.0
24.1

75.9
90.0

20 – 24 years old
(n=137)

25 – 29 years old
(n=60)

Q. Please tell us characteristics of your current job? [SA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243

91.3

30 years old and over
(n=46)
3. Company name of full-time employees
FPT was mostly chosen, accounting for 37.5%
Upon 10 respondents were asked, there was nearly 4 persons working for FPT. The following were Viettel and
Vinagame (VNG) with 8.5% and 4.5% respectively. Besides, there was 29.0% respondents working for small and
medium companies in Vietnam.

[Figure 3.1] Company name of full-time employees

Unit: %
37.5

29.0

8.5
4.5

4.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.0

Q. Please tell us what company you are working for? [SA] Based n=200 working as full-time employees

1.0

1.0
3. Company name of full-time employees
Most of male and female respondents worked for FPT
38.9% male respondents and 33.3% female ones worked for FPT. Besides, there was more than 20% working for small
and medium companies.

Unit: %

[Figure 3.2] Company name of full-time employees – By Gender
Gender
Male
Frequency

Gender
Female

Percent

Frequency

Male

Percent

Total

149

100.0

51

100.0

FPT

58

38.9

17

33.3

Vietttel

Frequency
Total

Female

Percent

Frequency

Percent

149

100.0

51

100.0

Dai Viet

1

0.7

1

2.0

14

9.4

3

5.9

Gameloft

1

0.7

0

0.0

Vinagame (VNG)

8

5.4

1

2.0

NEC Vietnam

0

0.0

0

0.0

AsiaSoft

6

4.0

0

0.0

VSS

0

0.0

1

2.0

Quang Trung Software

5

3.4

3

5.9

ASOFT

0

0.0

1

2.0

SIS Vietnam

4

2.7

0

0.0

ESoft

0

0.0

1

2.0

IBM Vietnam

4

2.7

0

0.0

MISA

0

0.0

2

3.9

Microsoft Vietnam

3

2.0

0

0.0

VNPT Technology

0

0.0

3

5.9

VASC

2

1.3

1

2.0

HDWebsoft

0

0.0

0

0.0

Global Cybersoft Vietnam

2

1.3

2

3.9

Delivery Vietnam

0

0.0

0

0.0

Vinasource

2

1.3

0

0.0

TRG International

0

0.0

0

0.0

DTSoft

1

0.7

0

0.0

VC Corporation

0

0.0

0

0.0

GSOFT

1

0.7

0

0.0

Other SMEs

37

24.8

15

29.4

Q. Please tell us what company you are working for? [SA] Based n=200
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=200
3. Company name of full-time employees
FPT was mostly chosen in all age groups
All age groups worked for FPT, respectively accounting for 48.1%, 24.1% and 28.6% for each group. In addition,
percentage of working for small and medium companies was rather high.

Unit: %

[Figure 3.3] Company name of full-time employees – By Age Group
Age
20 - 24 years old
Freq.

Percent

Age

25 - 29 years old
Freq.

Percent

30 years old and
over
Freq.

20 - 24 years old

Percent

Total

104

100.0

54

100.0

42

100.0

FPT

50

48.1

13

24.1

12

28.6

Vietttel

10

9.6

6

11.1

1

AsiaSoft

5

4.8

0

0.0

Vinagame (VNG)

4

3.8

2

3.7

Quang Trung Software

3

2.9

3

IBM Vietnam

2

1.9

1

Freq.
Total

Percent

25 - 29 years old
Freq.

Percent

30 years old and
over
Freq.

Percent

104

100.0

54

100.0

42

100.0

Microsoft Vietnam

1

1.0

2

3.7

0

0.0

2.4

Gameloft

1

1.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

2.4

NEC Vietnam

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

3

7.1

ASOFT

0

0.0

1

1.9

0

0.0

5.6

2

4.8

DTSoft

0

0.0

1

1.9

0

0.0

1.9

1

2.4

GSOFT

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

2.4

VASC

1

1.0

1

1.9

1

2.4

VNPT Technology

0

0.0

1

1.9

2

4.8

VSS

1

1.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

HDWebsoft

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

SIS Vietnam

1

1.0

1

1.9

2

4.8

Delivery Vietnam

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

Dai Viet

1

1.0

0

0.0

1

2.4

TRG International

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

ESoft

1

1.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

VC Corporation

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

MISA

1

1.0

1

1.9

0

0.0

Vinasource

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

4.8

Global Cybersoft Vietnam

1

1.0

1

1.9

2

4.8

Other SMEs

21

20.2

20

37.0

11

26.2

Q. Please tell us what company you are working for? [SA] Based n=200
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=200
4. Company name of freelancers
FPT was the first choice for freelanced programmers
37.2% of 43 respondents working as a freelancer did outsourced projects for FPT. The following are Viettel and Quang
Trung Software, respectively accounting for 20.9% and 16.3%. Besides, there were 34.9% receiving projects from
smaller companies or through relationship.

[Figure 4] Company name of freelancers

Unit: %
37.2

34.9

20.9
16.3
14.0
7.0
4.7

4.7

4.7

4.7
2.3

Q. Please tell us what company you are working for as a freelancer? [MA] Based n=43

2.3

2.3

2.3

2.3
5. Popular platforms
Nearly 70% respondents used Window platform
The result pointed out that Window was the most popular platform that mostly used by 68.7% respondents. Web is the
second platform with 55.6%. Besides, there ware some platforms which have not been very popular in Vietnam such as
Symbian, Palm / WebOS, RIM or Bada.

[Figure 5.1] Popular platforms

Unit: %

68.7
55.6
44.4
32.9
18.9

14.8

10.7

10.3
4.9

Q. Please tell us what platform you are using? [MA] Based n=243

2.9

1.2

0.0

1.2
5. Popular platforms
Bada was not used by both male and female group
Window was reported as the most popular platform in both gender groups, respectively accounting for 68.0% of male
respondents and 71.0% of female ones. Being opposite of Window, not only male but also female group did not choose
Bada as their regular platforms.

[Figure 5.2] Popular platforms – By Gender

Unit: %
80.0
72.0
64.0
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

Cloud
Window
Palm /
Symbian
computin
Phone
WebOS
g

Window

Web

Java

Android

iOS

Linux

Male
(n=181)

68.0

55.8

47.0

36.5

21.5

15.5

11.6

10.5

6.1

Female
(n=62)

71.0

54.8

37.1

22.6

11.3

12.9

8.1

9.7

1.6

Q. Please tell us what platform you are using? [MA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243

RIM

Bada

Others

3.3

1.7

0.0

1.7

1.6

0.0

0.0

0.0
5. Popular platforms
Bada was not used by all age groups
Window was reported as the most popular platform in all age groups. The next ones were Web and Java. No respondent
in all groups chose Bada as their regular platforms.

[Figure 5.3] Popular platforms – By Age

Unit: %
88.0
80.0
72.0
64.0
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

Cloud
Window
Symbia Palm /
computi
Phone
n
WebOS
ng

Window

Web

Java

Android

iOS

Linux

20 - 24 years old (n=137)

68.6

54.7

47.4

38.0

21.2

13.9

13.1

8.0

6.6

25 - 29 years old (n=60)

78.3

63.3

40.0

30.0

18.3

18.3

8.3

11.7

30 years old and over (n=46)

56.5

47.8

41.3

21.7

13.0

13.0

4.3

17.4

Q. Please tell us what platform you are using? [MA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243

RIM

Bada

Others

2.2

2.2

0.0

0.7

3.3

3.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.2

4.3

0.0

0.0

4.3
6. Platform used most often
40.7% respondents used Window most often
Upon 10 people were asked, there was about 4 persons using Window most often. The following platform was Web with
24.5%. In contrast, no one used Palm / WebOS or Bada as their main platform.

[Figure 6.1] Platform used most often

Unit: %

40.7

24.5

13.3

12.4

2.9

2.9

1.2

Q. Please tell us which platform you use most often? [SA] Based n=243

1.2

.4

.4

0.0

0.0

0.4
6. Platform used most often
Window was used most often by both gender groups
Window, Web and Android were used most often in both male and female group. In particular, Window was at the top
with 38.1% of male respondents and 46.8% of female ones.

[Figure 6.2] Platform used most often – By Gender

Unit: %
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0
Window

Web

Android

Java

Cloud
computin
g

iOS

Window
Phone

Linux

Symbian

RIM

Palm /
WebOS

Bada

Others

Male
(n=181)

38.1

24.9

14.4

13.8

3.3

2.2

1.1

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.0

0.0

0.6

Female
(n=62)

46.8

22.6

9.7

9.7

1.6

4.8

1.6

3.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Q. Please tell us which platform you use most often? [SA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
6. Platform used most often
Window was used most often by all age groups
All age groups used Window as their main platform. The following ones were Web, Android and Java. In
particular, Java seemed to be more preferable in the group of 30 years old and over, accounting for 21.7%.

[Figure 6.3] Platform used most often – By Age

Unit: %

64.0
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

Cloud
Window
computi Linux
Phone
ng

Symbia
n

RIM

Palm /
WebOS

Bada

Others

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.7

3.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

8.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.2

Window

Web

Android

Java

iOS

20 - 24 years old (n=137)

38.0

24.1

17.5

13.1

2.2

1.5

1.5

25 - 29 years old (n=60)

55.0

23.3

8.3

5.0

3.3

0.0

30 years old and over (n=46)

28.3

26.1

6.5

21.7

4.3

2.2

Q. Please tell us which platform you use most often? [SA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
7. Potentiality of platforms
Android and Cloud Computing achieved high potentiality
For mobile, Android was predicted to be applied mostly, accounting for 40.3%. The next one was Window Phone with
35.0%. For computer, Cloud Computing was perceived as the most potential platform by 44.4% respondents. The
second position belonged to Window, accounting for 36.2%.

[Figure 7.1]Potentiality of platforms

Unit: %

44.4
40.3
36.2

35.0

8.2
3.7
0.4

8.2
1.6

4.5
2.5

Android Web

4.1
1.2

Java

4.5
0.4
0.4

0.0

0.0

Palm /
Symbia
Linux
WebOS
n

Window

iOS

For mobile

3.7

8.2

40.3

2.5

1.2

0.4

0.0

For computer

36.2

0.4

1.6

4.5

4.1

0.4

4.5

Q. Please tell us about potentiality of each platform in the future? [Matrix SA]

0.0

1.2
0.4

2.5
0.0
Cloud
Window
computi Others
Phone
ng

RIM

Bada

0.0

0.0

0.4

35.0

8.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.2

2.5

44.4

0.0
7. Potentiality of platforms
Android and Cloud Computing achieved high potentiality
Both male and female group agreed that Android was the highest potential platform for Mobile and Cloud Computing
was for Computer in the future. The second one for Mobile phone was Window Phone and for Computer was
Window.

[Figure 7.2]Potentiality of platforms – By Gender

Unit: %

For
Mobile

Cloud
computi Window Web
ng

Android

Window
Phone

iOS

Male (n=181)

41.4

34.8

8.3

5.5

4.4

2.8

1.7

0.6

Female (n=62)

37.1

35.5

8.1

16.1

1.6

1.6

0.0

0.0

For
Computer

Cloud
computi Window Web
ng

Linux

Java Android

Java

Palm /
Bada
WebOS

Linux

Symbia
n

RIM

Others

0.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

iOS

Symbia
n

RIM

Others

Window Palm /
Bada
Phone WebOS

Male (n=181)

43.1

39.2

5.0

4.4

2.8

2.2

2.2

0.6

0.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Female (n=62)

48.4

27.4

3.2

4.8

8.1

0.0

3.2

0.0

3.2

1.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

Q. Please tell us about potentiality of each platform in the future? [Matrix SA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
7. Potentiality of platforms
There was difference among age groups
For mobile, while the group of 20 – 24 years old thought that Android would be the highest potentiality, the others voted
Window Phone as the mot potential platform. For Computer, Cloud Computing was mostly chosen by the groups of 25 –
29 years old and 30 years old and over. Not as those groups, the youngest group preferred Window.

[Figure 7.3]Potentiality of platforms – By Age

Unit: %

Cloud
computi Window Java
ng

Android

Window
Phone

iOS

20 - 24 years old (n=137)

46.7

27.7

8.0

8.0

5.1

2.2

0.7

0.7

25 - 29 years old (n=60)

33.3

45.0

8.3

6.7

1.7

0.0

5.0

30 years old and over (n=46)

30.4

43.5

8.7

10.9

2.2

0.0

For
Mobile

For
Computer

Cloud
Window computi Web
ng

Linux

Java Android

Linux

Symbia
n

RIM

Others

0.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Window
Phone

iOS

Bada

RIM

Others

Web

Palm /
Bada
WebOS

Palm / Symbia
WebOS
n

20 - 24 years old (n=137)

40.1

39.4

5.1

5.1

3.6

2.9

2.2

0.7

0.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25 - 29 years old (n=60)

31.7

50.0

5.0

5.0

1.7

0.0

3.3

0.0

3.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

30 years old and over (n=46)

30.4

52.2

2.2

2.2

8.7

0.0

2.2

0.0

0.0

2.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

Q. Please tell us about potentiality of each platform in the future? [Matrix SA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
8. Popular programming languages
Java was the most popular programming language, accounting for 58.4%
Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons using Java. The next languages were HTML, C# and C++
with 53.5%, 52.3% and 51.9% respectively.

[Figure 8.1] Popular programming languages

Unit: %
58.4

53.5

52.3

51.9

39.9

21.8

2.5
Java

HTML

C#

C++

PHP

Q. Please tell us what programming language you are currently using? [MA] Based n=243

VB.net

Others
8. Popular programming languages
Both male and female group used Java often
More than 50% of male and female group used Java regularly. The following platform chosen by 56.9% male
respondents was C++ and female ones voted for HTML, accounting for 51.6%.

[Figure 8.2] Popular programming languages – By Gender

Unit: %
64.0
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

Java

C++

C#

HTML

PHP

VB.net

Others

Male (n=181)

58.0

56.9

54.1

54.1

42.0

21.0

2.2

Female (n=62)

59.7

37.1

46.8

51.6

33.9

24.2

3.2

Q. Please tell us what programming language you are currently using? [MA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
8. Popular programming languages
The youngest group preferred C++
Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons in the group of 20 – 24 years old using C++. However, this
language was not so popular as Java in the older groups.

Unit: %

[Figure 8.3] Popular programming languages – By Age
72.0
64.0
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

C++

C#

Java

HTML

PHP

VB.net

Others

20 - 24 years old (n=137)

61.3

58.4

55.5

53.3

40.9

16.8

2.9

25 - 29 years old (n=60)

40.0

53.3

63.3

61.7

46.7

30.0

3.3

30 years old and over (n=46)

39.1

32.6

60.9

43.5

28.3

26.1

0.0

Q. Please tell us what programming language you are currently using? [MA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
9. Programming language used most often
Java and C# were the languages used most often
There was 27.2% respondents using Java as their regular programming language. The next one is C# and
C++, respectively accounting for 24.3% and 19.3%. Also, the result also showed that less respondents used VB.net as
their main language.

[Figure 9.1] Programming language used most often

Unit: %

27.2
24.3

19.3
15.2

9.1
4.9

0.0
Java

C#

C++

PHP

HTML

Q. Please tell us what programming language you use most often? [SA] Based n=243

VB.net

Others
9. Programming language used most often
Female group preferred using Java than other languages
As the graph was shown in Figure 9.2, Java was more preferable than other languages in female group. Not only using
Java, male respondents also used C# regularly that was proved by seemingly close percentages.

Unit: %

[Figure 9.2] Programming language used most often – By Gender
40.0

32.0

24.0

16.0

8.0

0.0

Java

C#

C++

PHP

HTML

VB.net

Others

Male (n=181)

25.4

24.3

21.5

16.0

9.4

3.3

0.0

Female (n=62)

32.3

24.2

12.9

12.9

8.1

9.7

0.0

Q. Please tell us what programming language you use most often? [SA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
9. Programming language used most often
Java was outstanding in the oldest group with 41.3%
The group of 30 years old and over especially liked to use Java more than the other languages, accounting for 41.3%.
Besides Java, the group of 20 – 24 years old also preferred C# and C++. Not as those two groups, respondents aged 25
– 29 years old mostly voted for C# with 33.3%.
Unit: %

[Figure 9.3] Programming language used most often – By Age
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

Java

C#

C++

PHP

HTML

VB.net

Others

20 - 24 years old (n=137)

25.5

24.1

24.1

16.8

7.3

2.2

0.0

25 - 29 years old (n=60)

20.0

33.3

10.0

16.7

11.7

8.3

0.0

30 years old and over (n=46)

41.3

13.0

17.4

8.7

10.9

8.7

0.0

Q. Please tell us what programming language you use most often? [SA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
10. Popularity of programming languages
72.9% agreed that HTML was the most popular language
HTML was voted as the most common language by 72.9% respondents. The following one were Java and
PHP, respectively accounting for 72.8% and 66.6%.

[Figure 10.1] Popularity of programming languages
Very not popular

Not popular

Neutral

Popular

Very popular
3.3

8.2
26.3

21.4

17.7

11.5

25.9

30.9
31.3

38.7

42.4
40.7

46.5

42.0

66.3

48.1
32.1

31.7
26.7

23.5

23.9
5.8

3.7

Java

Mean

6.2

11.1

2.1

C#

C++

PHP

3.67

3.83

3.94

3.72

Q. Please tell us popularity degree for each language? [Matrix SA] Based n=243

11.9

2.1

7.0

VB.net

HTML

Others

3.34

3.99

2.92
10. Popularity of programming languages
HTML gained the highest score in both male and female group
Both males and females rated the highest score for HTML. The second programming language was Java with the score
of 3.92 in male group and 4.00 in female ones.

[Figure 10.2] Popularity of programming languages – By Gender

Gender

Java

C#

C++

PHP

VB.net

HTML

Chú thích rõ là m
ơi.
Others

Total

3.94

3.72

3.67

3.83

3.34

3.99

2.92

Male

3.92

3.77

3.72

3.88

3.39

3.98

2.91

Female

4.00

3.58

3.53

3.69

3.21

4.02

2.95

Q. Please tell us popularity degree for each language? [Matrix SA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
10. Popularity of programming languages
Java scored the highest in the group of 25 – 29 years old
Respondents aged 25 – 29 years old agreed that Java was the most popular. In contrast, the most popular programming
language in groups of 20 – 24 years old and 30 years old and over was HTML, respectively score of 4.04 and 3.87.

[Figure 10.3] Popularity of programming languages – By Age
Age

Java

C#

C++

PHP

VB.net

HTML

Others

Total

3.94

3.72

3.67

3.83

3.34

3.99

2.92

20 - 24 years old

3.95

3.71

3.84

3.93

3.28

4.04

2.88

25 - 29 years old

4.05

4.02

3.53

3.90

3.48

3.98

3.05

30 years old and over

3.76

3.37

3.35

3.43

3.33

3.87

2.89

Q. Please tell us popularity degree for each language? [Matrix SA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
11. Awareness of Cloud Computing
Nearly 90% respondents knew CLOUD COMPUTING
Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 9 persons knowing about Clouding Computing. In particular, 26.7%
respondents knew it clearly.

[Figure 11.1] Awareness of CLOUD COMPUTING
Absolutely not know

Maybe know / don't know

Know a little bit

5.8%
4.9%

26.7%

62.6%

Q. Please tell us level of your knowledge about CLOUD COMPUTING? [SA] Based n=243

Know clearly
11. Awareness of Cloud Computing
There was no difference between male and female group
Both male and female group knew about Cloud Computing with high percent of more than 85%. In particular, over 25%
of both male and female respondents knew clearly about Cloud Computing.

[Figure 11.2] Awareness of Cloud Computing – By Gender
Male
(n=181)
6.1%

Female
(n=62)
4.8%
5.0%

4.8%

Absolutely not
know

26.5%

Maybe know /
don't know

Absolutely not
know
27.4%

Maybe know /
don't know

Know a little bit
62.4%

Know clearly

Q. Please tell us level of your knowledge about CLOUD COMPUTING? [SA] Based n=243
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243

Know a little bit
62.9%

Know clearly
11. Awareness of Cloud Computing
All age groups knew about Cloud Computing
Cloud Computing was well-recognized by all age groups, respectively accounting for 92%, 85% and 86.9%. In
particular, the percentage of Know clearly was very high which was more than 20%.

[Figure 11.3] Awareness of Cloud Computing – By Age
20 - 24 years old
(n=137)

25 - 29 years old
(n=60)

30 years old and over
(n=46)

Absolutely not know

Absolutely not know

Absolutely not know

Maybe know / don't know

Maybe know / don't know

Maybe know / don't know

Know a little bit

Know a little bit

Know a little bit

Know clearly

Know clearly

Know clearly

4.4% 3.6%

6.5%
8.3%

6.5%

6.7%

21.7%

27.0%

32.6%

65.0%

63.3%

Q. Please tell us level of your knowledge about CLOUD COMPUTING? [SA] Based n=243
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243

54.3%
12. Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING
Cloud Computing was assessed to be popular in Vietnam
There was about 47% respondents agreeing that Cloud Computing was popular in Vietnam. However, 28% of 229
knowing about Cloud Computing thought that it had not been very popular in Vietnam.

[Figure 12.1] Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING
Very not popular

Not popular

Neutral

Popular

2.6%
4.8%

22.7%
45.0%

24.9%

Q. Please tell us the popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING in Vietnam? [SA] Based n=229

Very popular
12. Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING
Male respondents thought Cloud Computing was very popular in Vietnam
50% of male respondents agreed that Cloud Computing was Popular in Vietnam while female ones was not sure about
the popularity of Cloud Computing.

[Figure 12.2] Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING – By Gender

Unit: %
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

Very not popular

Not popular

Neutral

Popular

Very popular

Male
(n=170)

5.3

20.0

21.8

50.0

2.9

Female
(n=59)

3.4

30.5

33.9

30.5

1.7

Q. Please tell us the popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING in Vietnam? [SA] Based n=229
Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=229
12. Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING
All age groups agreed that Cloud Computing was popular in Vietnam
Cloud Computing was supposed to be popular platform in Vietnam by all age groups.

Unit: %

[Figure 12.3] Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING – By Age
64.0
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
24.0
16.0
8.0
0.0

Very not popular

Not popular

Neutral

Popular

Very popular

20 - 24 years old (n=131)

6.1

21.4

26.0

42.7

3.8

25 - 29 years old (n=55)

1.8

23.6

30.9

41.8

1.8

30 years old and over (n=43)

4.7

25.6

14.0

55.8

0.0

Q. Please tell us the popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING in Vietnam? [SA] Based n=229
Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=229
13. Reasons for Cloud Computing popularity
There were some specific reasons for Cloud Computing popularity
For respondents who agreed that Cloud Computing was popular, Widely share resources was the top reason they gave
out. Meanwhile, New platform and not commonly used was picked from the list of reasons why Cloud Computing is
not very popular in Vietnam.
Unit: %

[Figure 13] Reasons for Cloud Computing popularity
CLOUD COMPUTING is popular

CLOUD COMPUTING is not popular

Widely share resources

84.4

Can access data wherever
has internet

78.0

Reduce maintanence and
management cost

76.7

Fees are not suitable for small
companies

58.3

67.9
Worry about security's ability

Investment fee is cheaper
than buying server
Preferred by big companies /
corporations

New platform and not
commonly used

47.5

64.2
Depend on server of supplier

36.7

59.6
Internet is mandatory

Processing speed is fast
Allow for switching among
platforms

56.0

33.3

56.0

Quickly open and close
applications

46.8

Difficult in sharing files
Others

11.7
0.8

Q. Please tell us why CLOUD COMPUTING is popular in Vietnam? [MA] Based n=109
Q. Please tell us reasons why CLOUD COMPUTING has not been popular in Vietnam? [MA] Based n=120
14. Names of COMPUTING CLOUD
Google App Engine was mostly known by 65.5% respondents.
When asking 229 respondents, there was 65.5% of them knowing about Google App Engine. The next ones are
Microsoft Azure, Blue Cloud and Cloud Sites, respectively accounting for 52.8%, 48.0% and 46.3%.

[Figure 14] Names of COMPUTING CLOUD

Unit: %
65.5

52.8
48.0

46.3

32.3
25.8
20.5
9.6

7.9

5.2
1.7

Google
App
Engine

Microsoft Blue Cloud Cloud Sites
Azure

Joyent
Cloud

Elastic
Compute
Cloud

Aptana
Cloud

Salesforce

Q. Please tell us what CLOUD COMPUTING you know / have heard of? [MA] Based n=229

Heroku

Ning

Others
D – Member Profile
Member profile

Age

Gender
Male

Female

20 - 24 years old

25 - 29 years old

30 years old and over

19.4%
30.0%
49.2%
70.0%

31.4%
W&S Company Limited is a 100% Japanese investment. Our main professions are ‘Online market
research’, ‘Web creative’ and ‘Web marketing’. Online research is conducted based on Vinaresearch –
our actively managed over 118,000 members panel with various segmentations across Vietnam.

FOR FURTHER INQUIRIES, PLEASE CONTACT:
W&S Company Limited
» Address: Floor 10, 40 Pham Ngoc Thach St., District 3, HCMC
» Office phone: 84 – 8 – 38 223 215 Fax: 84 – 8 – 38 223 216
» Email: info@vinaresearch.jp
» Website: http://vinaresearch.jp/

The copyright of this report belongs to W&S Company Limited. The results
(analyzing, wording, data, tables and graphs) of this survey can be publicly used, but must be cited and
sourced from W&S Company Limited (also include its website address http://vinaresearch.jp).

More Related Content

What's hot

Education and Skills Online - General Information
Education and Skills Online - General InformationEducation and Skills Online - General Information
Education and Skills Online - General Information
AIRPIAAC
 
Kirkizh E.
Kirkizh E.Kirkizh E.
Kirkizh E.
Nora Kirkizh
 
It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...
It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...
It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...
Cinda Holsombach-Ebner
 
What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...
What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...
What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...
Julie Evans
 
Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000
Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000
Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000
gibb0
 
Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002
Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002
Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002
Cinda Holsombach-Ebner
 
Media management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogies
Media management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogiesMedia management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogies
Media management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogies
european media management association
 
ICDE Hong Kong
ICDE Hong KongICDE Hong Kong
ICDE Hong Kong
Cinda Holsombach-Ebner
 
Microsoft Office B
Microsoft Office BMicrosoft Office B
Microsoft Office B
Christina Cecil
 
Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...
Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...
Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...
Angela Williamson
 
Education in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICT
Education in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICTEducation in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICT
Education in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICT
Sahr O Fasuluku
 
SMSM2014
SMSM2014SMSM2014
SMSM2014
Nora Kirkizh
 
e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009
e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009
e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009
andyramsden
 
Study Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in Learning
Study Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in LearningStudy Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in Learning
Study Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in Learning
IJCSIS Research Publications
 
Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and Discussion
Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and DiscussionLearning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and Discussion
Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and Discussion
Blackboard
 
Facebook for educational purposes
Facebook for educational purposes Facebook for educational purposes
Facebook for educational purposes
Jack Stavrides
 
Article E-Learning
Article E-LearningArticle E-Learning
Article E-Learning
Dara Marciani
 

What's hot (17)

Education and Skills Online - General Information
Education and Skills Online - General InformationEducation and Skills Online - General Information
Education and Skills Online - General Information
 
Kirkizh E.
Kirkizh E.Kirkizh E.
Kirkizh E.
 
It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...
It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...
It's Not Rocket Science, or is It? Large Scale Quality Engineering in Distanc...
 
What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...
What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...
What Everyone Should Know (but Probably Doesn’t) About Students and Digital L...
 
Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000
Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000
Bhsdhs Goals Objectives Benchmarks year 2000
 
Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002
Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002
Thesis Committee Review Presentation - 2002
 
Media management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogies
Media management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogiesMedia management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogies
Media management education: challenges, key themes and pedagogies
 
ICDE Hong Kong
ICDE Hong KongICDE Hong Kong
ICDE Hong Kong
 
Microsoft Office B
Microsoft Office BMicrosoft Office B
Microsoft Office B
 
Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...
Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...
Efficacy Regarding Social Media and Its Implications for NonProfit Agencies T...
 
Education in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICT
Education in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICTEducation in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICT
Education in Sierra Leone, SDG4 & Monitoring with ICT
 
SMSM2014
SMSM2014SMSM2014
SMSM2014
 
e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009
e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009
e-learning Reality Check: Keynote Durham University 2009
 
Study Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in Learning
Study Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in LearningStudy Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in Learning
Study Egyptian Students’ Perception of Using Social Media in Learning
 
Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and Discussion
Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and DiscussionLearning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and Discussion
Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update Data and Discussion
 
Facebook for educational purposes
Facebook for educational purposes Facebook for educational purposes
Facebook for educational purposes
 
Article E-Learning
Article E-LearningArticle E-Learning
Article E-Learning
 

Viewers also liked

W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012
W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012
W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012
W&S Market Research
 
Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014
Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014
Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014
W&S Market Research
 
W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014
W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014
W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014
W&S Market Research
 
W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013
W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013
W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013
W&S Market Research
 
Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014
Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014
Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014
W&S Market Research
 
Report subpanel disease_May_2014
Report subpanel disease_May_2014Report subpanel disease_May_2014
Report subpanel disease_May_2014
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới Việt
W&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới ViệtW&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới Việt
W&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới Việt
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Vinaresearch_Report job changing in vietnam
W&S_Vinaresearch_Report   job changing in vietnamW&S_Vinaresearch_Report   job changing in vietnam
W&S_Vinaresearch_Report job changing in vietnam
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...
W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...
W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...
W&S Market Research
 
Denim fashion photo contest_Vietnamese
Denim fashion photo contest_VietnameseDenim fashion photo contest_Vietnamese
Denim fashion photo contest_Vietnamese
W&S Market Research
 
Svstore
SvstoreSvstore
Quán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biển
Quán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biểnQuán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biển
Quán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biển
W&S Market Research
 

Viewers also liked (12)

W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012
W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012
W&S_Khảo sát về Tết truyền thống âm lịch 2012
 
Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014
Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014
Report shampoo Vietnam_May_2014
 
W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014
W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014
W&S Report on_habit_of_using_smartphone_10_2014
 
W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013
W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013
W&s_Vinaresearch_Report cooking_oil_tracking_october 2013
 
Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014
Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014
Tình hình sử dụng Smartphone 2014
 
Report subpanel disease_May_2014
Report subpanel disease_May_2014Report subpanel disease_May_2014
Report subpanel disease_May_2014
 
W&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới Việt
W&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới ViệtW&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới Việt
W&S_Thói quen mua sắm áo sơ mi công sở của nam giới Việt
 
W&S_Vinaresearch_Report job changing in vietnam
W&S_Vinaresearch_Report   job changing in vietnamW&S_Vinaresearch_Report   job changing in vietnam
W&S_Vinaresearch_Report job changing in vietnam
 
W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...
W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...
W&S_Báo cáo nghiên cứu về thói quen tiêu dùng và phong cách thời trang của ng...
 
Denim fashion photo contest_Vietnamese
Denim fashion photo contest_VietnameseDenim fashion photo contest_Vietnamese
Denim fashion photo contest_Vietnamese
 
Svstore
SvstoreSvstore
Svstore
 
Quán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biển
Quán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biểnQuán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biển
Quán trà sữa máy lạnh tại vùng biển
 

Similar to W&S_Vinaresearch_Report programming may2013

Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013
Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013
Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013
MACROMILL SOUTH EAST ASIA, INC.
 
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICATHE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
cscpconf
 
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICATHE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
csandit
 
Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...
Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...
Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...
Eduserv
 
Requirements analysis IAKM website
Requirements analysis IAKM websiteRequirements analysis IAKM website
Requirements analysis IAKM website
Kent State University
 
2014 Software Development Survey Results
2014 Software Development Survey Results 2014 Software Development Survey Results
2014 Software Development Survey Results
TECNA - Technology Councils of North America
 
Developer Skills Report
Developer Skills ReportDeveloper Skills Report
Developer Skills Report
Francisco Santibañez
 
Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013
Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013
Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013
MACROMILL SOUTH EAST ASIA, INC.
 
DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015
DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015
DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015
DisasterReady.org
 
AaE Final Findings And Decisions
AaE Final Findings And DecisionsAaE Final Findings And Decisions
AaE Final Findings And Decisions
Kevin Gamble
 
Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...
Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...
Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...
Yael Zofi
 
Revista Streaming Media
Revista Streaming MediaRevista Streaming Media
Revista Streaming Media
Paulo Cristóvão
 
Suggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egypt
Suggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egyptSuggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egypt
Suggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egypt
Tasneem Abd El Hameed
 
Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...
Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...
Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...
Laura Vanessa Munoz
 
Global time paper
Global time paperGlobal time paper
Global time paper
Claire Spiret
 
Security Survey 2013 UK
Security Survey 2013 UKSecurity Survey 2013 UK
Security Survey 2013 UK
Kim Jensen
 
Security survey2013 en
Security survey2013 enSecurity survey2013 en
Security survey2013 en
Anatoliy Tkachev
 
Africa's Voices sustainability analysis
Africa's Voices sustainability analysisAfrica's Voices sustainability analysis
Africa's Voices sustainability analysis
sharathsrinivasan
 
System i user survey 2013
System i user survey 2013System i user survey 2013
System i user survey 2013
Inforsystemi
 
ISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptx
ISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptxISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptx
ISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptx
Jisc
 

Similar to W&S_Vinaresearch_Report programming may2013 (20)

Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013
Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013
Report on Programming Field in Vietnam 2013
 
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICATHE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
 
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICATHE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
THE PERCEPTIONS OF AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA
 
Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...
Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...
Investigation into the management of web content in Higher Education Institut...
 
Requirements analysis IAKM website
Requirements analysis IAKM websiteRequirements analysis IAKM website
Requirements analysis IAKM website
 
2014 Software Development Survey Results
2014 Software Development Survey Results 2014 Software Development Survey Results
2014 Software Development Survey Results
 
Developer Skills Report
Developer Skills ReportDeveloper Skills Report
Developer Skills Report
 
Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013
Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013
Report on Internet Browser in Indonesia 2013
 
DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015
DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015
DisasterReady.org Training Needs Assessment 2015
 
AaE Final Findings And Decisions
AaE Final Findings And DecisionsAaE Final Findings And Decisions
AaE Final Findings And Decisions
 
Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...
Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...
Virtual Team Trends Results - Global Study in Preparation for A Manager’s Gui...
 
Revista Streaming Media
Revista Streaming MediaRevista Streaming Media
Revista Streaming Media
 
Suggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egypt
Suggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egyptSuggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egypt
Suggest Framework to apply agile methodlogy in egypt
 
Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...
Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...
Tendencias y estado de la comunicación estratégica y relaciones públicas en E...
 
Global time paper
Global time paperGlobal time paper
Global time paper
 
Security Survey 2013 UK
Security Survey 2013 UKSecurity Survey 2013 UK
Security Survey 2013 UK
 
Security survey2013 en
Security survey2013 enSecurity survey2013 en
Security survey2013 en
 
Africa's Voices sustainability analysis
Africa's Voices sustainability analysisAfrica's Voices sustainability analysis
Africa's Voices sustainability analysis
 
System i user survey 2013
System i user survey 2013System i user survey 2013
System i user survey 2013
 
ISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptx
ISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptxISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptx
ISDX2 Oct 2023 .pptx
 

More from W&S Market Research

W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013
W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013
W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Cosmetics subpanel
W&S_Cosmetics subpanelW&S_Cosmetics subpanel
W&S_Cosmetics subpanel
W&S Market Research
 
Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3
Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3
Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3
W&S Market Research
 
W&s infographic gdgt
W&s infographic gdgtW&s infographic gdgt
W&s infographic gdgt
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013
W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013
W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Christmas 2013 Quick Report
W&S_Christmas 2013 Quick ReportW&S_Christmas 2013 Quick Report
W&S_Christmas 2013 Quick Report
W&S Market Research
 
Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16
Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16
Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012
W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012
W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012
W&S Market Research
 
Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012
Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012
Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Home maid-service-report 2
W&S_Home maid-service-report 2W&S_Home maid-service-report 2
W&S_Home maid-service-report 2
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012
W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012
W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012
W&S Market Research
 
W&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_English
W&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_EnglishW&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_English
W&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_English
W&S Market Research
 
W&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nay
W&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nayW&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nay
W&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nay
W&S Market Research
 
W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2
W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2
W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2
W&S Market Research
 
W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014
W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014
W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014
W&S Market Research
 
W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014
W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014
W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014
W&S Market Research
 
Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)
Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)
Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)
W&S Market Research
 
Máy cạo vỏ mía tự động
Máy cạo vỏ mía tự độngMáy cạo vỏ mía tự động
Máy cạo vỏ mía tự động
W&S Market Research
 
Hệ thống take away 579
Hệ thống take away 579Hệ thống take away 579
Hệ thống take away 579
W&S Market Research
 
Dự án diabetes restaurant
Dự án diabetes restaurantDự án diabetes restaurant
Dự án diabetes restaurant
W&S Market Research
 

More from W&S Market Research (20)

W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013
W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013
W&S Report usb flash drive_December 2013
 
W&S_Cosmetics subpanel
W&S_Cosmetics subpanelW&S_Cosmetics subpanel
W&S_Cosmetics subpanel
 
Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3
Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3
Cảm nhận về ngày Mùng 8 tháng 3
 
W&s infographic gdgt
W&s infographic gdgtW&s infographic gdgt
W&s infographic gdgt
 
W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013
W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013
W&S_Infographic_Cafe hoà tan năm 2013
 
W&S_Christmas 2013 Quick Report
W&S_Christmas 2013 Quick ReportW&S_Christmas 2013 Quick Report
W&S_Christmas 2013 Quick Report
 
Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16
Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16
Mụn trứng cá ở lứa tuổi thanh thiếu niên 16
 
W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012
W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012
W&S_Report shampoo_market_2012
 
Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012
Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012
Khảo sát về ngày lễ tình nhân (Valentine) 2012
 
W&S_Home maid-service-report 2
W&S_Home maid-service-report 2W&S_Home maid-service-report 2
W&S_Home maid-service-report 2
 
W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012
W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012
W&S_Report about Vietnam Cinema Attendance Trend 2012
 
W&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_English
W&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_EnglishW&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_English
W&S_Report about Vietnamese life 2012_English
 
W&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nay
W&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nayW&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nay
W&S Khảo sát về thói quen ăn vặt của giới trẻ hiện nay
 
W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2
W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2
W&S Nghiên cứu_cuộc_vận_động_người_việt_nam_ưu_tiên_dùng_hàng_việt_nam_2013_2
 
W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014
W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014
W&S Báo cáo_khảo_sát_về_tết_truyền_thống_2014
 
W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014
W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014
W&s bao cao_nha_o_tai_hanoi_va_hcm_01_2014
 
Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)
Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)
Report on sexual activity and contraceptive methods for female ( June 2014)
 
Máy cạo vỏ mía tự động
Máy cạo vỏ mía tự độngMáy cạo vỏ mía tự động
Máy cạo vỏ mía tự động
 
Hệ thống take away 579
Hệ thống take away 579Hệ thống take away 579
Hệ thống take away 579
 
Dự án diabetes restaurant
Dự án diabetes restaurantDự án diabetes restaurant
Dự án diabetes restaurant
 

Recently uploaded

Mariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceX
Mariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceXMariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceX
Mariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceX
Mariano Tinti
 
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing InstancesEnergy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Alpen-Adria-Universität
 
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - AuthorizationOpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization
David Brossard
 
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data Warehouse
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data WarehouseWebinar: Designing a schema for a Data Warehouse
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data Warehouse
Federico Razzoli
 
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and MilvusGenerating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Zilliz
 
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development ProvidersYour One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
akankshawande
 
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Jason Packer
 
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
saastr
 
June Patch Tuesday
June Patch TuesdayJune Patch Tuesday
June Patch Tuesday
Ivanti
 
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying AheadDigital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
Wask
 
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
Jakub Marek
 
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
DanBrown980551
 
Recommendation System using RAG Architecture
Recommendation System using RAG ArchitectureRecommendation System using RAG Architecture
Recommendation System using RAG Architecture
fredae14
 
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAUHCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
panagenda
 
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 202420240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
Matthew Sinclair
 
Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
Project Management Semester Long Project - AcuityProject Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
jpupo2018
 
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
TrustArc
 
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyGraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
Tomaz Bratanic
 
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
名前 です男
 
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionSkybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Tatiana Kojar
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Mariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceX
Mariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceXMariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceX
Mariano G Tinti - Decoding SpaceX
 
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing InstancesEnergy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
 
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - AuthorizationOpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization
 
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data Warehouse
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data WarehouseWebinar: Designing a schema for a Data Warehouse
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data Warehouse
 
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and MilvusGenerating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
 
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development ProvidersYour One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
 
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
 
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
 
June Patch Tuesday
June Patch TuesdayJune Patch Tuesday
June Patch Tuesday
 
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying AheadDigital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
 
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
 
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
 
Recommendation System using RAG Architecture
Recommendation System using RAG ArchitectureRecommendation System using RAG Architecture
Recommendation System using RAG Architecture
 
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAUHCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
 
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 202420240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
 
Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
Project Management Semester Long Project - AcuityProject Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
 
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
 
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyGraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
 
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
 
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionSkybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
 

W&S_Vinaresearch_Report programming may2013

  • 1. REPORT ON PROGRAMMING FIELD IN VIETNAM Research time: 4th – 20th May 2013 Based on Vinaresearch’s panellist Date: 22nd May 2013 Creator: W&S Group
  • 2. Table of content A – Executive Summary B – Research Information C – Research Findings D – Member Profile 1~4 5~6 6 ~ 42 43 ~ 44
  • 3. A. Executive summary [1] Game programming is rather not popular • 29.3% of 443 respondents did not work on Game programming. In terms of frequency degree, System analyzing is at the top as it gained average score of 4.04. The next ones are System Administration and Research & Development. • Frequency of working on System analyzing is at the top with mean of 4.06 in male group and 4.00 in female group. The second field was System administration in male group and Research & Development in female one. • As the Figure 1.3 showed below, mean of Research & Development and System analyzing is very close in 25 – 29 years old group. In the other words, both of these fields were preferred by this group. For the other age groups, System analyzing was outstanding compared to other fields. [2] 82.3% respondents worked as a full-time employee • 82.3% of 243 respondents who are working in programming fields were Full-time employees. However, there was 17.7% working on outsourced projects only. • Upon 10 males / females were asked, there was more than 8 persons working as Full-time employee. • Generally, percentage of Full-time employees was higher than Only work as freelancer. However, this numerical data was not consensus among age groups.
  • 4. A. Executive summary [3] FPT was mostly chosen, accounting for 37.5% • Upon 10 respondents were asked, there was nearly 4 persons working for FPT. The following were Viettel and Vinagame (VNG) with 8.5% and 4.5% respectively. Besides, there was 29.0% respondents working for small and medium companies in Vietnam. • 38.9% male respondents and 33.3% female ones worked for FPT. Besides, there was more than 20% working for small and medium companies. • All age groups worked for FPT, respectively accounting for 48.1%, 24.1% and 28.6% for each group. In addition, percentage of working for small and medium companies was rather high. [4] FPT was the first choice for freelanced programmers • 37.2% of 43 respondents working as a freelancer did outsourced projects for FPT. The following are Viettel and Quang Trung Software, respectively accounting for 20.9% and 16.3%. Besides, there were 34.9% receiving projects from smaller companies or through relationship.
  • 5. A. Executive summary [5] Nearly 70% respondents used Window platform • The result pointed out that Window was the most popular platform that mostly used by 68.7% respondents. Web is the second platform with 55.6%. Besides, there ware some platforms which have not been very popular in Vietnam such as Symbian, Palm / WebOS, RIM or Bada. • Window was reported as the most popular platform in both gender groups, respectively accounting for 68.0% of male respondents and 71.0% of female ones. Being opposite of Window, not only male but also female group did not choose Bada as their regular platforms. • Window was reported as the most popular platform in all age groups. The next ones were Web and Java. No respondent in all groups chose Bada as their regular platforms. [6] 40.7% respondents used Window most often • 37.2% of 43 respondents working as a freelancer did outsourced projects for FPT. The following are Viettel and Quang Trung Software, respectively accounting for 20.9% and 16.3%. Besides, there were 34.9% receiving projects from smaller companies or through relationship. • Window, Web and Android were used most often in both male and female group. In particular, Window was at the top with 38.1% of male respondents and 46.8% of female ones. • All age groups used Window as their main platform. The following ones were Web, Android and Java. In particular, Java seemed to be more preferable in the group of 30 years old and over, accounting for 21.7%..
  • 6. A. Executive summary [7] Android and Cloud Computing achieved high potentiality • For mobile, Android was predicted to be applied mostly, account for 40.3%. The next one was Window Phone with 35.0%. For computer, Cloud Computing was perceived as the most potential platform by 44.4% respondents. The second position belonged to Window, accounting for 36.2%. • Both male and female group agreed that Android was the highest potential platform for Mobile and Cloud Computing was for Computer in the future. The second one for Mobile phone was Window Phone and for Computer was Window. • For mobile, while the group of 20 – 24 years old thought that Android would be the highest potentiality, the others voted Window Phone as the mot potential platform. For Computer, Cloud Computing was mostly chosen by the groups of 25 – 29 years old and 30 years old and over. Not as those groups, the youngest group preferred Window. [8] Java was the most popular programming language, accounting for 58.4% • Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons using Java. The next languages were HTML , C# and C++ with 53.5%, 52.3% and 51.9% respectively. • More than 50% of male and female group used Java regularly. The following platform chosen by 56.9% male respondents was C++ and female ones voted for HTML, accounting for 51.6%. • Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons in the group of 20 – 24 years old using C++. However, this language was not so popular as Java in the older groups.
  • 7. A. Executive summary [9] Java and C# were the languages used most often • There was 27.2% respondents using Java as their regular programming language. The next one is C# and C++, respectively accounting for 24.3% and 19.3%. Also, the result also showed that less respondents used VB.net as their main language. • As the graph was shown in Figure 9.2, Java was more preferable than other languages in female group. Not only using Java, male respondents also used C# regularly that was proved by seemingly close percentages. • The group of 30 years old and over especially liked to use Java more than the other languages, accounting for 41.3%. Besides Java, the group of 20 – 24 years old also preferred C# and C++. Not as those two groups, respondents aged 25 – 29 years old mostly voted for C# with 33.3%. [10] 72.9% agreed that HTML was the most popular language • HTML was voted as the most common language by 72.9% respondents. The following one were Java and PHP, respectively accounting for 72.8% and 66.6%. • Both males and females rated the highest score for HTML. The second programming language was Java with the score of 3.92 in male group and 4.00 in female ones. • Respondents aged 25 – 29 years old agreed that Java was the most popular. In contrast, the most popular programming language in groups of 20 – 24 years old and 30 years old and over was HTML, respectively score of 4.04 and 3.87.
  • 8. A. Executive summary [11] Nearly 90% respondents knew CLOUD COMPUTING • Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 9 persons knowing about Clouding Computing. In particular, 26.7% respondents knew it clearly. • Both male and female group knew about Cloud Computing with high percent of more than 85%. In particular, over 25% of both male and female respondents knew clearly about Cloud Computing. • Cloud Computing was well-recognized by all age groups, respectively accounting for 92%, 85% and 86.9%. In particular, the percentage of Know clearly was very high which was more than 20%. [12] Cloud Computing was assessed to be popular in Vietnam • There was about 47% respondents agreeing that Cloud Computing was popular in Vietnam. However, 28% of 229 knowing about Cloud Computing thought that it had not been very popular in Vietnam. • 50% of male respondents agreed that Cloud Computing was Popular in Vietnam while female ones was not sure about the popularity of Cloud Computing. • Cloud Computing was supposed to be popular platform in Vietnam by all age groups.
  • 9. A. Executive summary [13] There were some specific reasons for Cloud Computing popularity • For respondents who agreed that Cloud Computing was popular, Widely share resources was the top reason they gave out. Meanwhile, New platform and not commonly used was picked from the list of reasons why Cloud Computing is not very popular in Vietnam. [14] Google App Engine was mostly known by 65.5% respondents. • When asking 229 respondents, there was 65.5% of them knowing about Google App Engine. The next ones are Microsoft Azure, Blue Cloud and Cloud Sites, respectively accounting for 52.8%, 48.0% and 46.3%.
  • 10. B. Research information Research method : Quantitative – Online research Timing : 4th – 20th May 2013 Sample size : 243 Research area : Nationwide Target : Working in Programming field Research objectives : 1. Explore popular platforms and languages 2. Popularity of Cloud Computing in Vietnam Sampling method : Convenience sampling
  • 11. C – Research Findings
  • 12. 1. Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT Game programming is rather not popular 29.3% of 443 respondents did not work on Game programming. In terms of frequency degree, System analyzing is at the top as it gained average score of 4.04. The next ones are System Administration and Research & Development. [Figure 1.1] Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT Unit: % Never 12.6 15.6 Very rarely Rarely 8.1 Sometimes Often Very often 14.9 14.5 26.7 26.0 23.6 26.0 16.3 10.8 26.5 21.0 26.2 18.6 15.6 24.7 28.2 26.8 14.8 19.5 8.6 14.7 6.0 29.3 19.1 Application programming Mean 14.9 Web programming 3.68 3.77 Game programming 2.97 8.4 7.5 6.5 11.8 8.2 13.7 12.3 10.8 System administration Research & Development System analyzing 3.90 Q. Please tell us how often you work these following jobs? [Matrix MA] Based n=443 3.89 11.5 4.04
  • 13. 1. Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT Both male and female group worked on System analyzing often Frequency of working on System analyzing is at the top with mean of 4.06 in male group and 4.00 in female group. The second field was System administration in male group and Research & Development in female one. [Figure 1.2] Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT – By Gender Male (n=293) Never Very rarely Rarely Sometimes Female (n=126) Often Very often Mean Never Very rarely Rarely Sometimes Often Very often Mean Application programming 16.4% 5.1% 15.4% 20.8% 28.7% 13.7% 3.81 25.4% 7.9% 13.5% 21.4% 21.4% 10.3% 3.37 Web programming 12.1% 9.0% 19.7% 15.9% 28.3% 15.2% 3.85 21.4% 6.3% 19.0% 15.1% 21.4% 16.7% 3.59 Game programming 24.2% 8.1% 27.0% 20.7% 11.6% 8.4% 3.13 41.1% 9.7% 19.4% 13.7% 8.9% 7.3% 2.61 9.0% 7.6% 14.2% 27.0% 27.3% 14.9% 4.01 18.1% 10.2% 15.7% 15.7% 25.2% 15.0% 3.65 Research & Development 10.7% 8.3% 15.2% 26.9% 24.5% 14.5% 3.90 16.0% 5.6% 10.4% 24.0% 29.6% 14.4% 3.89 System analyzing 10.3% 6.5% 12.4% 24.7% 29.9% 16.2% 4.06 11.8% 6.3% 9.4% 31.5% 24.4% 16.5% 4.00 System administration Q. Please tell us how often you work these following jobs? [Matrix MA] Based n=443 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=443
  • 14. 1. Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT Research & Development and System analyzing were chosen by group of 25 – 29 years old As the Figure 1.3 showed below, mean of Research & Development and System analyzing is very close in 25 – 29 years old group. In the other words, both of these fields were preferred by this group. For the other age groups, System analyzing was outstanding compared to other fields. [Figure 1.3] Frequency of working on specialized fields of IT – By Age Age Group Application Web Game System Research & programming programming programming administration Development System analyzing Total 3.68 3.77 2.97 3.90 3.89 4.04 20 - 24 years old (n=213) 3.73 3.97 3.26 3.90 3.88 4.09 25 - 29 years old (n=136) 3.44 3.54 2.53 3.78 3.84 3.83 30 years old and over (n=84) 3.93 3.62 2.94 4.08 4.03 4.25 Q. Please tell us how often you work these following jobs? [Matrix MA] Based n=443 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=443
  • 15. 2. Job’s characteristics 82.3% respondents worked as a full-time employee 82.3% of 243 respondents who are working in programming fields were Full-time employees. However, there was 17.7% working on outsourced projects only. Unit: % [Figure 2.1] Job’s characteristics Only work as freelancer Full-time employee 17.7 82.3 Q. Please tell us characteristics of your current job? [SA] Based n=243
  • 16. 2. Job’s characteristics 82.3% male and female respondents worked as a full-time employee Upon 10 males / females were asked, there was more than 8 persons working as Full-time employee. [Figure 2.2] Job’s characteristics – By Gender Unit: % Only work as freelancer Full-time employee Only work as freelancer Full-time employee 17.7 17.7 82.3 82.3 Male (n=181) Q. Please tell us characteristics of your current job? [SA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243 Female (n=62)
  • 17. 2. Job’s characteristics Percentage of full-time employees was higher in three groups. Generally, percentage of Full-time employees was higher than Only work as freelancer. However, this numerical data was not consensus among age groups. [Figure 2.3] Job’s characteristics – By Age Unit: % Only work as freelancer Full-time employee 8.7 10.0 24.1 75.9 90.0 20 – 24 years old (n=137) 25 – 29 years old (n=60) Q. Please tell us characteristics of your current job? [SA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243 91.3 30 years old and over (n=46)
  • 18. 3. Company name of full-time employees FPT was mostly chosen, accounting for 37.5% Upon 10 respondents were asked, there was nearly 4 persons working for FPT. The following were Viettel and Vinagame (VNG) with 8.5% and 4.5% respectively. Besides, there was 29.0% respondents working for small and medium companies in Vietnam. [Figure 3.1] Company name of full-time employees Unit: % 37.5 29.0 8.5 4.5 4.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 Q. Please tell us what company you are working for? [SA] Based n=200 working as full-time employees 1.0 1.0
  • 19. 3. Company name of full-time employees Most of male and female respondents worked for FPT 38.9% male respondents and 33.3% female ones worked for FPT. Besides, there was more than 20% working for small and medium companies. Unit: % [Figure 3.2] Company name of full-time employees – By Gender Gender Male Frequency Gender Female Percent Frequency Male Percent Total 149 100.0 51 100.0 FPT 58 38.9 17 33.3 Vietttel Frequency Total Female Percent Frequency Percent 149 100.0 51 100.0 Dai Viet 1 0.7 1 2.0 14 9.4 3 5.9 Gameloft 1 0.7 0 0.0 Vinagame (VNG) 8 5.4 1 2.0 NEC Vietnam 0 0.0 0 0.0 AsiaSoft 6 4.0 0 0.0 VSS 0 0.0 1 2.0 Quang Trung Software 5 3.4 3 5.9 ASOFT 0 0.0 1 2.0 SIS Vietnam 4 2.7 0 0.0 ESoft 0 0.0 1 2.0 IBM Vietnam 4 2.7 0 0.0 MISA 0 0.0 2 3.9 Microsoft Vietnam 3 2.0 0 0.0 VNPT Technology 0 0.0 3 5.9 VASC 2 1.3 1 2.0 HDWebsoft 0 0.0 0 0.0 Global Cybersoft Vietnam 2 1.3 2 3.9 Delivery Vietnam 0 0.0 0 0.0 Vinasource 2 1.3 0 0.0 TRG International 0 0.0 0 0.0 DTSoft 1 0.7 0 0.0 VC Corporation 0 0.0 0 0.0 GSOFT 1 0.7 0 0.0 Other SMEs 37 24.8 15 29.4 Q. Please tell us what company you are working for? [SA] Based n=200 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=200
  • 20. 3. Company name of full-time employees FPT was mostly chosen in all age groups All age groups worked for FPT, respectively accounting for 48.1%, 24.1% and 28.6% for each group. In addition, percentage of working for small and medium companies was rather high. Unit: % [Figure 3.3] Company name of full-time employees – By Age Group Age 20 - 24 years old Freq. Percent Age 25 - 29 years old Freq. Percent 30 years old and over Freq. 20 - 24 years old Percent Total 104 100.0 54 100.0 42 100.0 FPT 50 48.1 13 24.1 12 28.6 Vietttel 10 9.6 6 11.1 1 AsiaSoft 5 4.8 0 0.0 Vinagame (VNG) 4 3.8 2 3.7 Quang Trung Software 3 2.9 3 IBM Vietnam 2 1.9 1 Freq. Total Percent 25 - 29 years old Freq. Percent 30 years old and over Freq. Percent 104 100.0 54 100.0 42 100.0 Microsoft Vietnam 1 1.0 2 3.7 0 0.0 2.4 Gameloft 1 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 2.4 NEC Vietnam 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 7.1 ASOFT 0 0.0 1 1.9 0 0.0 5.6 2 4.8 DTSoft 0 0.0 1 1.9 0 0.0 1.9 1 2.4 GSOFT 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 2.4 VASC 1 1.0 1 1.9 1 2.4 VNPT Technology 0 0.0 1 1.9 2 4.8 VSS 1 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 HDWebsoft 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SIS Vietnam 1 1.0 1 1.9 2 4.8 Delivery Vietnam 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Dai Viet 1 1.0 0 0.0 1 2.4 TRG International 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 ESoft 1 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 VC Corporation 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 MISA 1 1.0 1 1.9 0 0.0 Vinasource 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 4.8 Global Cybersoft Vietnam 1 1.0 1 1.9 2 4.8 Other SMEs 21 20.2 20 37.0 11 26.2 Q. Please tell us what company you are working for? [SA] Based n=200 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=200
  • 21. 4. Company name of freelancers FPT was the first choice for freelanced programmers 37.2% of 43 respondents working as a freelancer did outsourced projects for FPT. The following are Viettel and Quang Trung Software, respectively accounting for 20.9% and 16.3%. Besides, there were 34.9% receiving projects from smaller companies or through relationship. [Figure 4] Company name of freelancers Unit: % 37.2 34.9 20.9 16.3 14.0 7.0 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 2.3 Q. Please tell us what company you are working for as a freelancer? [MA] Based n=43 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
  • 22. 5. Popular platforms Nearly 70% respondents used Window platform The result pointed out that Window was the most popular platform that mostly used by 68.7% respondents. Web is the second platform with 55.6%. Besides, there ware some platforms which have not been very popular in Vietnam such as Symbian, Palm / WebOS, RIM or Bada. [Figure 5.1] Popular platforms Unit: % 68.7 55.6 44.4 32.9 18.9 14.8 10.7 10.3 4.9 Q. Please tell us what platform you are using? [MA] Based n=243 2.9 1.2 0.0 1.2
  • 23. 5. Popular platforms Bada was not used by both male and female group Window was reported as the most popular platform in both gender groups, respectively accounting for 68.0% of male respondents and 71.0% of female ones. Being opposite of Window, not only male but also female group did not choose Bada as their regular platforms. [Figure 5.2] Popular platforms – By Gender Unit: % 80.0 72.0 64.0 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Cloud Window Palm / Symbian computin Phone WebOS g Window Web Java Android iOS Linux Male (n=181) 68.0 55.8 47.0 36.5 21.5 15.5 11.6 10.5 6.1 Female (n=62) 71.0 54.8 37.1 22.6 11.3 12.9 8.1 9.7 1.6 Q. Please tell us what platform you are using? [MA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243 RIM Bada Others 3.3 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
  • 24. 5. Popular platforms Bada was not used by all age groups Window was reported as the most popular platform in all age groups. The next ones were Web and Java. No respondent in all groups chose Bada as their regular platforms. [Figure 5.3] Popular platforms – By Age Unit: % 88.0 80.0 72.0 64.0 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Cloud Window Symbia Palm / computi Phone n WebOS ng Window Web Java Android iOS Linux 20 - 24 years old (n=137) 68.6 54.7 47.4 38.0 21.2 13.9 13.1 8.0 6.6 25 - 29 years old (n=60) 78.3 63.3 40.0 30.0 18.3 18.3 8.3 11.7 30 years old and over (n=46) 56.5 47.8 41.3 21.7 13.0 13.0 4.3 17.4 Q. Please tell us what platform you are using? [MA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243 RIM Bada Others 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.7 3.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.3
  • 25. 6. Platform used most often 40.7% respondents used Window most often Upon 10 people were asked, there was about 4 persons using Window most often. The following platform was Web with 24.5%. In contrast, no one used Palm / WebOS or Bada as their main platform. [Figure 6.1] Platform used most often Unit: % 40.7 24.5 13.3 12.4 2.9 2.9 1.2 Q. Please tell us which platform you use most often? [SA] Based n=243 1.2 .4 .4 0.0 0.0 0.4
  • 26. 6. Platform used most often Window was used most often by both gender groups Window, Web and Android were used most often in both male and female group. In particular, Window was at the top with 38.1% of male respondents and 46.8% of female ones. [Figure 6.2] Platform used most often – By Gender Unit: % 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Window Web Android Java Cloud computin g iOS Window Phone Linux Symbian RIM Palm / WebOS Bada Others Male (n=181) 38.1 24.9 14.4 13.8 3.3 2.2 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 Female (n=62) 46.8 22.6 9.7 9.7 1.6 4.8 1.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q. Please tell us which platform you use most often? [SA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
  • 27. 6. Platform used most often Window was used most often by all age groups All age groups used Window as their main platform. The following ones were Web, Android and Java. In particular, Java seemed to be more preferable in the group of 30 years old and over, accounting for 21.7%. [Figure 6.3] Platform used most often – By Age Unit: % 64.0 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Cloud Window computi Linux Phone ng Symbia n RIM Palm / WebOS Bada Others 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 Window Web Android Java iOS 20 - 24 years old (n=137) 38.0 24.1 17.5 13.1 2.2 1.5 1.5 25 - 29 years old (n=60) 55.0 23.3 8.3 5.0 3.3 0.0 30 years old and over (n=46) 28.3 26.1 6.5 21.7 4.3 2.2 Q. Please tell us which platform you use most often? [SA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
  • 28. 7. Potentiality of platforms Android and Cloud Computing achieved high potentiality For mobile, Android was predicted to be applied mostly, accounting for 40.3%. The next one was Window Phone with 35.0%. For computer, Cloud Computing was perceived as the most potential platform by 44.4% respondents. The second position belonged to Window, accounting for 36.2%. [Figure 7.1]Potentiality of platforms Unit: % 44.4 40.3 36.2 35.0 8.2 3.7 0.4 8.2 1.6 4.5 2.5 Android Web 4.1 1.2 Java 4.5 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 Palm / Symbia Linux WebOS n Window iOS For mobile 3.7 8.2 40.3 2.5 1.2 0.4 0.0 For computer 36.2 0.4 1.6 4.5 4.1 0.4 4.5 Q. Please tell us about potentiality of each platform in the future? [Matrix SA] 0.0 1.2 0.4 2.5 0.0 Cloud Window computi Others Phone ng RIM Bada 0.0 0.0 0.4 35.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 2.5 44.4 0.0
  • 29. 7. Potentiality of platforms Android and Cloud Computing achieved high potentiality Both male and female group agreed that Android was the highest potential platform for Mobile and Cloud Computing was for Computer in the future. The second one for Mobile phone was Window Phone and for Computer was Window. [Figure 7.2]Potentiality of platforms – By Gender Unit: % For Mobile Cloud computi Window Web ng Android Window Phone iOS Male (n=181) 41.4 34.8 8.3 5.5 4.4 2.8 1.7 0.6 Female (n=62) 37.1 35.5 8.1 16.1 1.6 1.6 0.0 0.0 For Computer Cloud computi Window Web ng Linux Java Android Java Palm / Bada WebOS Linux Symbia n RIM Others 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 iOS Symbia n RIM Others Window Palm / Bada Phone WebOS Male (n=181) 43.1 39.2 5.0 4.4 2.8 2.2 2.2 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Female (n=62) 48.4 27.4 3.2 4.8 8.1 0.0 3.2 0.0 3.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q. Please tell us about potentiality of each platform in the future? [Matrix SA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
  • 30. 7. Potentiality of platforms There was difference among age groups For mobile, while the group of 20 – 24 years old thought that Android would be the highest potentiality, the others voted Window Phone as the mot potential platform. For Computer, Cloud Computing was mostly chosen by the groups of 25 – 29 years old and 30 years old and over. Not as those groups, the youngest group preferred Window. [Figure 7.3]Potentiality of platforms – By Age Unit: % Cloud computi Window Java ng Android Window Phone iOS 20 - 24 years old (n=137) 46.7 27.7 8.0 8.0 5.1 2.2 0.7 0.7 25 - 29 years old (n=60) 33.3 45.0 8.3 6.7 1.7 0.0 5.0 30 years old and over (n=46) 30.4 43.5 8.7 10.9 2.2 0.0 For Mobile For Computer Cloud Window computi Web ng Linux Java Android Linux Symbia n RIM Others 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Window Phone iOS Bada RIM Others Web Palm / Bada WebOS Palm / Symbia WebOS n 20 - 24 years old (n=137) 40.1 39.4 5.1 5.1 3.6 2.9 2.2 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25 - 29 years old (n=60) 31.7 50.0 5.0 5.0 1.7 0.0 3.3 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30 years old and over (n=46) 30.4 52.2 2.2 2.2 8.7 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q. Please tell us about potentiality of each platform in the future? [Matrix SA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
  • 31. 8. Popular programming languages Java was the most popular programming language, accounting for 58.4% Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons using Java. The next languages were HTML, C# and C++ with 53.5%, 52.3% and 51.9% respectively. [Figure 8.1] Popular programming languages Unit: % 58.4 53.5 52.3 51.9 39.9 21.8 2.5 Java HTML C# C++ PHP Q. Please tell us what programming language you are currently using? [MA] Based n=243 VB.net Others
  • 32. 8. Popular programming languages Both male and female group used Java often More than 50% of male and female group used Java regularly. The following platform chosen by 56.9% male respondents was C++ and female ones voted for HTML, accounting for 51.6%. [Figure 8.2] Popular programming languages – By Gender Unit: % 64.0 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Java C++ C# HTML PHP VB.net Others Male (n=181) 58.0 56.9 54.1 54.1 42.0 21.0 2.2 Female (n=62) 59.7 37.1 46.8 51.6 33.9 24.2 3.2 Q. Please tell us what programming language you are currently using? [MA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
  • 33. 8. Popular programming languages The youngest group preferred C++ Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 6 persons in the group of 20 – 24 years old using C++. However, this language was not so popular as Java in the older groups. Unit: % [Figure 8.3] Popular programming languages – By Age 72.0 64.0 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 C++ C# Java HTML PHP VB.net Others 20 - 24 years old (n=137) 61.3 58.4 55.5 53.3 40.9 16.8 2.9 25 - 29 years old (n=60) 40.0 53.3 63.3 61.7 46.7 30.0 3.3 30 years old and over (n=46) 39.1 32.6 60.9 43.5 28.3 26.1 0.0 Q. Please tell us what programming language you are currently using? [MA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
  • 34. 9. Programming language used most often Java and C# were the languages used most often There was 27.2% respondents using Java as their regular programming language. The next one is C# and C++, respectively accounting for 24.3% and 19.3%. Also, the result also showed that less respondents used VB.net as their main language. [Figure 9.1] Programming language used most often Unit: % 27.2 24.3 19.3 15.2 9.1 4.9 0.0 Java C# C++ PHP HTML Q. Please tell us what programming language you use most often? [SA] Based n=243 VB.net Others
  • 35. 9. Programming language used most often Female group preferred using Java than other languages As the graph was shown in Figure 9.2, Java was more preferable than other languages in female group. Not only using Java, male respondents also used C# regularly that was proved by seemingly close percentages. Unit: % [Figure 9.2] Programming language used most often – By Gender 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Java C# C++ PHP HTML VB.net Others Male (n=181) 25.4 24.3 21.5 16.0 9.4 3.3 0.0 Female (n=62) 32.3 24.2 12.9 12.9 8.1 9.7 0.0 Q. Please tell us what programming language you use most often? [SA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
  • 36. 9. Programming language used most often Java was outstanding in the oldest group with 41.3% The group of 30 years old and over especially liked to use Java more than the other languages, accounting for 41.3%. Besides Java, the group of 20 – 24 years old also preferred C# and C++. Not as those two groups, respondents aged 25 – 29 years old mostly voted for C# with 33.3%. Unit: % [Figure 9.3] Programming language used most often – By Age 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Java C# C++ PHP HTML VB.net Others 20 - 24 years old (n=137) 25.5 24.1 24.1 16.8 7.3 2.2 0.0 25 - 29 years old (n=60) 20.0 33.3 10.0 16.7 11.7 8.3 0.0 30 years old and over (n=46) 41.3 13.0 17.4 8.7 10.9 8.7 0.0 Q. Please tell us what programming language you use most often? [SA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
  • 37. 10. Popularity of programming languages 72.9% agreed that HTML was the most popular language HTML was voted as the most common language by 72.9% respondents. The following one were Java and PHP, respectively accounting for 72.8% and 66.6%. [Figure 10.1] Popularity of programming languages Very not popular Not popular Neutral Popular Very popular 3.3 8.2 26.3 21.4 17.7 11.5 25.9 30.9 31.3 38.7 42.4 40.7 46.5 42.0 66.3 48.1 32.1 31.7 26.7 23.5 23.9 5.8 3.7 Java Mean 6.2 11.1 2.1 C# C++ PHP 3.67 3.83 3.94 3.72 Q. Please tell us popularity degree for each language? [Matrix SA] Based n=243 11.9 2.1 7.0 VB.net HTML Others 3.34 3.99 2.92
  • 38. 10. Popularity of programming languages HTML gained the highest score in both male and female group Both males and females rated the highest score for HTML. The second programming language was Java with the score of 3.92 in male group and 4.00 in female ones. [Figure 10.2] Popularity of programming languages – By Gender Gender Java C# C++ PHP VB.net HTML Chú thích rõ là m ơi. Others Total 3.94 3.72 3.67 3.83 3.34 3.99 2.92 Male 3.92 3.77 3.72 3.88 3.39 3.98 2.91 Female 4.00 3.58 3.53 3.69 3.21 4.02 2.95 Q. Please tell us popularity degree for each language? [Matrix SA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243
  • 39. 10. Popularity of programming languages Java scored the highest in the group of 25 – 29 years old Respondents aged 25 – 29 years old agreed that Java was the most popular. In contrast, the most popular programming language in groups of 20 – 24 years old and 30 years old and over was HTML, respectively score of 4.04 and 3.87. [Figure 10.3] Popularity of programming languages – By Age Age Java C# C++ PHP VB.net HTML Others Total 3.94 3.72 3.67 3.83 3.34 3.99 2.92 20 - 24 years old 3.95 3.71 3.84 3.93 3.28 4.04 2.88 25 - 29 years old 4.05 4.02 3.53 3.90 3.48 3.98 3.05 30 years old and over 3.76 3.37 3.35 3.43 3.33 3.87 2.89 Q. Please tell us popularity degree for each language? [Matrix SA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243
  • 40. 11. Awareness of Cloud Computing Nearly 90% respondents knew CLOUD COMPUTING Upon 10 people were asked, there were around 9 persons knowing about Clouding Computing. In particular, 26.7% respondents knew it clearly. [Figure 11.1] Awareness of CLOUD COMPUTING Absolutely not know Maybe know / don't know Know a little bit 5.8% 4.9% 26.7% 62.6% Q. Please tell us level of your knowledge about CLOUD COMPUTING? [SA] Based n=243 Know clearly
  • 41. 11. Awareness of Cloud Computing There was no difference between male and female group Both male and female group knew about Cloud Computing with high percent of more than 85%. In particular, over 25% of both male and female respondents knew clearly about Cloud Computing. [Figure 11.2] Awareness of Cloud Computing – By Gender Male (n=181) 6.1% Female (n=62) 4.8% 5.0% 4.8% Absolutely not know 26.5% Maybe know / don't know Absolutely not know 27.4% Maybe know / don't know Know a little bit 62.4% Know clearly Q. Please tell us level of your knowledge about CLOUD COMPUTING? [SA] Based n=243 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=243 Know a little bit 62.9% Know clearly
  • 42. 11. Awareness of Cloud Computing All age groups knew about Cloud Computing Cloud Computing was well-recognized by all age groups, respectively accounting for 92%, 85% and 86.9%. In particular, the percentage of Know clearly was very high which was more than 20%. [Figure 11.3] Awareness of Cloud Computing – By Age 20 - 24 years old (n=137) 25 - 29 years old (n=60) 30 years old and over (n=46) Absolutely not know Absolutely not know Absolutely not know Maybe know / don't know Maybe know / don't know Maybe know / don't know Know a little bit Know a little bit Know a little bit Know clearly Know clearly Know clearly 4.4% 3.6% 6.5% 8.3% 6.5% 6.7% 21.7% 27.0% 32.6% 65.0% 63.3% Q. Please tell us level of your knowledge about CLOUD COMPUTING? [SA] Based n=243 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=243 54.3%
  • 43. 12. Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING Cloud Computing was assessed to be popular in Vietnam There was about 47% respondents agreeing that Cloud Computing was popular in Vietnam. However, 28% of 229 knowing about Cloud Computing thought that it had not been very popular in Vietnam. [Figure 12.1] Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING Very not popular Not popular Neutral Popular 2.6% 4.8% 22.7% 45.0% 24.9% Q. Please tell us the popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING in Vietnam? [SA] Based n=229 Very popular
  • 44. 12. Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING Male respondents thought Cloud Computing was very popular in Vietnam 50% of male respondents agreed that Cloud Computing was Popular in Vietnam while female ones was not sure about the popularity of Cloud Computing. [Figure 12.2] Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING – By Gender Unit: % 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Very not popular Not popular Neutral Popular Very popular Male (n=170) 5.3 20.0 21.8 50.0 2.9 Female (n=59) 3.4 30.5 33.9 30.5 1.7 Q. Please tell us the popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING in Vietnam? [SA] Based n=229 Q. What is your gender? [SA] Based n=229
  • 45. 12. Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING All age groups agreed that Cloud Computing was popular in Vietnam Cloud Computing was supposed to be popular platform in Vietnam by all age groups. Unit: % [Figure 12.3] Popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING – By Age 64.0 56.0 48.0 40.0 32.0 24.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 Very not popular Not popular Neutral Popular Very popular 20 - 24 years old (n=131) 6.1 21.4 26.0 42.7 3.8 25 - 29 years old (n=55) 1.8 23.6 30.9 41.8 1.8 30 years old and over (n=43) 4.7 25.6 14.0 55.8 0.0 Q. Please tell us the popularity of CLOUD COMPUTING in Vietnam? [SA] Based n=229 Q. How old are you? [SA] Based n=229
  • 46. 13. Reasons for Cloud Computing popularity There were some specific reasons for Cloud Computing popularity For respondents who agreed that Cloud Computing was popular, Widely share resources was the top reason they gave out. Meanwhile, New platform and not commonly used was picked from the list of reasons why Cloud Computing is not very popular in Vietnam. Unit: % [Figure 13] Reasons for Cloud Computing popularity CLOUD COMPUTING is popular CLOUD COMPUTING is not popular Widely share resources 84.4 Can access data wherever has internet 78.0 Reduce maintanence and management cost 76.7 Fees are not suitable for small companies 58.3 67.9 Worry about security's ability Investment fee is cheaper than buying server Preferred by big companies / corporations New platform and not commonly used 47.5 64.2 Depend on server of supplier 36.7 59.6 Internet is mandatory Processing speed is fast Allow for switching among platforms 56.0 33.3 56.0 Quickly open and close applications 46.8 Difficult in sharing files Others 11.7 0.8 Q. Please tell us why CLOUD COMPUTING is popular in Vietnam? [MA] Based n=109 Q. Please tell us reasons why CLOUD COMPUTING has not been popular in Vietnam? [MA] Based n=120
  • 47. 14. Names of COMPUTING CLOUD Google App Engine was mostly known by 65.5% respondents. When asking 229 respondents, there was 65.5% of them knowing about Google App Engine. The next ones are Microsoft Azure, Blue Cloud and Cloud Sites, respectively accounting for 52.8%, 48.0% and 46.3%. [Figure 14] Names of COMPUTING CLOUD Unit: % 65.5 52.8 48.0 46.3 32.3 25.8 20.5 9.6 7.9 5.2 1.7 Google App Engine Microsoft Blue Cloud Cloud Sites Azure Joyent Cloud Elastic Compute Cloud Aptana Cloud Salesforce Q. Please tell us what CLOUD COMPUTING you know / have heard of? [MA] Based n=229 Heroku Ning Others
  • 48. D – Member Profile
  • 49. Member profile Age Gender Male Female 20 - 24 years old 25 - 29 years old 30 years old and over 19.4% 30.0% 49.2% 70.0% 31.4%
  • 50. W&S Company Limited is a 100% Japanese investment. Our main professions are ‘Online market research’, ‘Web creative’ and ‘Web marketing’. Online research is conducted based on Vinaresearch – our actively managed over 118,000 members panel with various segmentations across Vietnam. FOR FURTHER INQUIRIES, PLEASE CONTACT: W&S Company Limited » Address: Floor 10, 40 Pham Ngoc Thach St., District 3, HCMC » Office phone: 84 – 8 – 38 223 215 Fax: 84 – 8 – 38 223 216 » Email: info@vinaresearch.jp » Website: http://vinaresearch.jp/ The copyright of this report belongs to W&S Company Limited. The results (analyzing, wording, data, tables and graphs) of this survey can be publicly used, but must be cited and sourced from W&S Company Limited (also include its website address http://vinaresearch.jp).