With growing pressure to reduce the carbon footprint of the built environment, building designers are increasingly being called upon to balance functionality and cost objectives with reduced environmental impact. Wood can help to achieve that balance. This presentation reviews how wood contributes to credits under the various green building rating systems, In addition, it reviews the importance of life cycle assessment and how it can be used when evaluating the environmental performance of buildings at the design stage.
Earn 1.00 HSW credit and 1 GBCI CE hour for LEED Credential Maintenance, visit: http://owl.li/yp66X
Human Habits and Energy Consumption in Residential BuildingsLeonardo ENERGY
Highlights:
* Looks into users’ heating habits in residential buildings.
* Discusses the term ‘rebound’ - the fact that improved efficiency can result in more spending.
* Gives factual proof that direct rebound plays leading role in energy consumption in residential buildings.
Wood A Natural Choice - How the Building Material Contributes to Sustainable ...Think Wood
This presentation contributes to the discourse on sustainability that is driving ongoing improvement in the way buildings are designed and constructed. Specifically, it focuses on the growing trends of wood use as a low environmental-impact building material and the effect green building rating systems have on design choices.
Learn more about:
Renewable Choice and LEED
Electricity production in the U.S.
Green building
Green power
Emission Reductions
Why Renewable Choice?
Renewable Choice Energy is a leading provider of climate change solutions including green power, carbon offsets, and renewable energy advisory services. Recognized as a trusted partner to numerous major brands, Renewable Choice was the recipient of the prestigious Green Power Supplier of the Year award in 2012 from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and has been featured in hundreds of media outlets. To learn more, visit www.renewablechoice.com.
Earth bag construction presentation-ilonkamarselis_11.6.2015ilonka marselis
A presentation on earth-bag construction along the lines of a practical workshop on building an earth-bag dome. This presentation includes some theoretical information on earth-bag building, some example projects, and guides you step by step through the process of building, plastering and painting an earthbag doem
IGBC Green Factory Building Rating System is a voluntary and consensus based programme. The rating system has been developed based on materials and technologies that are currently available. This rating system would facilitate the development of energy efficient, water efficient, healthy, more productive, environmentally friendly factories.
The rating programme uses well accepted national standards and wherever local or national standards are not available, appropriate international benchmarks have been considered.
The terms “hardwood” and “softwood” are often misleading because they have no direct relation to the actual physical hardness or softness of the wood, so that a hardwood may actually be softer than a softwood.
First Commercial CLT Project in the USADarryl Byle
Cross Lam Timber Solutions™ completed the first fully Cross-Laminated Timber building in the US in the fall of 2011 and the entire interior is exposed CLT. Below is a slide show of a recent CLT seminar we presented that explains the CLT construction process from concept to completion.
Join BuildingGreen, publishers of the GreenSpec product directory and Environmental Building News, at the NEXUS SaWhat Makes This Material Green?
This lecture will address the processes and tools used to determine the "greenness" of products and materials typically used in the construction process. We will begin with a brief discussion of Embodied Energy as a central factor in Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), one of the primary methods for judging a material's sustainability. We will then present some simple tools and techniques that allow for the practical application of these concepts to the materials selection process. Primary criteria for judging the "best in class" in specific product categories will also be discussed, as well as sources of supply. This lecture is intended as a general introduction to the green materials selection process. (Level 1)
Samples Library. A representative from Building Green will discuss some of GreenSpec's top 10 products of 2007. Emphasis will be placed on qualities to look for when specifying green products in these categories. Bring questions and a brown bag lunch.
Knock On Wood Communications & Events Marketing Plan - Term ProjectSarvanshu Ahluwalia
Building brands through connected communications, the core objective of the company and core objective for us to re-energizing the brand Knock On Wood.
This report was formulated for developing a marketing plan in order to promote the company for getting new clients. The recommendations are made after an in-depth evaluation of the research conducted and the analysis followed by it. Every approach is evaluated for the objective of formulating a comprehensive marketing plan for the company.
The recommendation made is to have a dynamic presence in social media followed with working with entrepreneurs to build a long lasting fruitful business relationship.
The strategy adopted is to leverage the existing network, promote new clients and increase the aspect of corporate social responsibility.
It is formulated based on the marketing objective i.e. to increase the revenue and acquire new clients for the company.
The tactics for implementing the strategies are inbound marketing, website, customer relationship management, collaborate with freelancers and focus on start-ups.
Human Habits and Energy Consumption in Residential BuildingsLeonardo ENERGY
Highlights:
* Looks into users’ heating habits in residential buildings.
* Discusses the term ‘rebound’ - the fact that improved efficiency can result in more spending.
* Gives factual proof that direct rebound plays leading role in energy consumption in residential buildings.
Wood A Natural Choice - How the Building Material Contributes to Sustainable ...Think Wood
This presentation contributes to the discourse on sustainability that is driving ongoing improvement in the way buildings are designed and constructed. Specifically, it focuses on the growing trends of wood use as a low environmental-impact building material and the effect green building rating systems have on design choices.
Learn more about:
Renewable Choice and LEED
Electricity production in the U.S.
Green building
Green power
Emission Reductions
Why Renewable Choice?
Renewable Choice Energy is a leading provider of climate change solutions including green power, carbon offsets, and renewable energy advisory services. Recognized as a trusted partner to numerous major brands, Renewable Choice was the recipient of the prestigious Green Power Supplier of the Year award in 2012 from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and has been featured in hundreds of media outlets. To learn more, visit www.renewablechoice.com.
Earth bag construction presentation-ilonkamarselis_11.6.2015ilonka marselis
A presentation on earth-bag construction along the lines of a practical workshop on building an earth-bag dome. This presentation includes some theoretical information on earth-bag building, some example projects, and guides you step by step through the process of building, plastering and painting an earthbag doem
IGBC Green Factory Building Rating System is a voluntary and consensus based programme. The rating system has been developed based on materials and technologies that are currently available. This rating system would facilitate the development of energy efficient, water efficient, healthy, more productive, environmentally friendly factories.
The rating programme uses well accepted national standards and wherever local or national standards are not available, appropriate international benchmarks have been considered.
The terms “hardwood” and “softwood” are often misleading because they have no direct relation to the actual physical hardness or softness of the wood, so that a hardwood may actually be softer than a softwood.
First Commercial CLT Project in the USADarryl Byle
Cross Lam Timber Solutions™ completed the first fully Cross-Laminated Timber building in the US in the fall of 2011 and the entire interior is exposed CLT. Below is a slide show of a recent CLT seminar we presented that explains the CLT construction process from concept to completion.
Join BuildingGreen, publishers of the GreenSpec product directory and Environmental Building News, at the NEXUS SaWhat Makes This Material Green?
This lecture will address the processes and tools used to determine the "greenness" of products and materials typically used in the construction process. We will begin with a brief discussion of Embodied Energy as a central factor in Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), one of the primary methods for judging a material's sustainability. We will then present some simple tools and techniques that allow for the practical application of these concepts to the materials selection process. Primary criteria for judging the "best in class" in specific product categories will also be discussed, as well as sources of supply. This lecture is intended as a general introduction to the green materials selection process. (Level 1)
Samples Library. A representative from Building Green will discuss some of GreenSpec's top 10 products of 2007. Emphasis will be placed on qualities to look for when specifying green products in these categories. Bring questions and a brown bag lunch.
Knock On Wood Communications & Events Marketing Plan - Term ProjectSarvanshu Ahluwalia
Building brands through connected communications, the core objective of the company and core objective for us to re-energizing the brand Knock On Wood.
This report was formulated for developing a marketing plan in order to promote the company for getting new clients. The recommendations are made after an in-depth evaluation of the research conducted and the analysis followed by it. Every approach is evaluated for the objective of formulating a comprehensive marketing plan for the company.
The recommendation made is to have a dynamic presence in social media followed with working with entrepreneurs to build a long lasting fruitful business relationship.
The strategy adopted is to leverage the existing network, promote new clients and increase the aspect of corporate social responsibility.
It is formulated based on the marketing objective i.e. to increase the revenue and acquire new clients for the company.
The tactics for implementing the strategies are inbound marketing, website, customer relationship management, collaborate with freelancers and focus on start-ups.
Need to get an understanding of what really makes a product green? What are the criteria? What is Life Cycle Assessment? How do you understand the environmental footprint of a product? What are the materials requirements for a LEED project? Come to this workshop to get the answers to these questions.
This workshop will address the fundamentals of green materials and provide you with the knowledge to evaluate and utilize green building products to reduce your organizations environmental impacts. Topics include criteria for evaluating how green a material is, LEEDs materials requirements, how to spec for green materials and LEED, and where to find information on green products. In addition to product characteristics, methods for going from selling green, to being green will be addressed. This program is intended for architects, contractors and product manufactures, and the general public.
The presenter was Siobhan Steyn, Project Associate at The Green Roundtable.
Stiftung Endamarariek - Health Centre in Tanzania Marc Hänggi
Das Health Centre und das Gesamtprojekt Endamarariek im Norden TanzaniasSeit 1985 Nachhaltigkeit und seit ca. 2005 völlig von Einheimischen geführt und verwaltet.Vor 1985 standen in der Region kaum Schulen, es gab keine medizinische Versorgung. Ausser einigen Händlern, einzelnen Gewerbetreibenden und Grossbauern wohnte der grösste Teil der Bevölkerung in Strohhütten und war selbstversorgend. Hungerepisoden traten bei Regenmangel immer wieder auf. Auf Initiative des Staates wurde um 1985 vor allem mit Hilfe von Schwei-zer Missionaren, schweizerischen Spendengeldern sowie dem Hilfswerk Misereor das Projekt Endamarariek (Primarschulen, Sekundarschulen, Mittelschule, Wasser und medizinische Versorgung, Pfarreien, Gewerbe) gestartet. Das Projekt sollte die Entwicklung der abgeschiedenen Region einleiten.
Insights Success is the Best Business Magazine in the world for enterprises, being a platform it focuses distinctively on emerging as well as leading fastest growing companies, their confrontational style of doing business and way of delivering effective and collaborative solutions to strengthen market share. Here, we talks about leader’s viewpoints & ideas, latest products/services, etc. Insights Success magazine reaches out to all the ‘C’ Level professional, VPs, Consultants, VCs, Managers, and HRs of various industries.
This presentation about the new product development, & how to make new product some contents that help how to make new product, promotion, price strategy.
Swisskenko presents with the SANYIKO CRM/ERP Business Application Framework one of the most complete Business Software Products in the African Market. We are you fullservice provider for Consulting, Implementation, Training and even individual developement.
Get more information on www.swisskenko.com or contact our sales team at sales@swisskenko.com
Rethinking Wood as a Material of Choice – Costs less, Delivers moreThink Wood
Designers today are finding new possibilities in one of the oldest building materials on earth, wood. The building material has always been valued for its beauty, abundance and practicality, but many of wood’s inherent characteristics are rising to very current challenges. Wood’s traditional values and newest technologies meet in the projects presented in this course, illustrating the advantages of wood in four areas: cost-effectiveness in a wide range of projects; adaptability for use in challenging, visionary new designs; lower environmental costs throughout its life cycle, from its source in renewable, carefully managed forests, through an energy-efficient service life, and often on to a new, recycled and reimagined use; and a unique human-nature connection that has always been intuitive, but is now being documented in research.
Find out how wood construction can contribute to a sustainable building. Using scientifically based life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this session demonstrates why wood products are better for the environment than other materials in terms of indicators such as global warming potential and resource depletion. LCA is becoming the world standard for evaluating the sustainability of materials and assemblies and improving environmentally based decision-making. See why wood from well-managed forests and plantations is a good choice when it comes to climate change.
New Union South Sustainability 6.1.2009shaynahetzel
It's an exciting time to be a part of the Wisconsin Union, as an organization. We just celebrated our 100th anniversary last year and as we begin our next century of service, we look to the future for our buildings and programs.
Sustainability is a buzz word in today’s society. There are lots of definitions of what it is and what it means. Here’s a definition from the EPA: sustainability is: meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
These are our initiatives to green building and sustainable practices.
Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) and other green building standards are setting a new bar for energy efficiency in the built environment. Michigan has seen it's share of highly visible success stories recently which have been driven by visionary architects, builders and property owners. Our expert panel will discuss implications for goal setting, strategies, new technologies, public policy and career opportunities.
Cost-effective, code-compliant and sustainable, mid-rise wood construction is gaining the attention of design professionals nationwide, who see it as a way to achieve higher density housing at lower cost—while reducing the carbon footprint of their projects. Yet, many familiar with wood construction for two- to four-story residential structures are not aware that the International Building Code (IBC) allows wood-frame construction for five stories and more in building occupancies that range from business and mercantile to multi-family, military, senior, student and affordable housing. This presentation reviews the benefits of multi-story wood construction, the code requirements and discusses the design techniques used in multi-story wood construction.
Modern Building Codes: Keeping Pace with the Wood RevolutionThink Wood
There is a quiet revolution
taking place within the design
community. After a long
emphasis on concrete and steel for
buildings other than homes, design
professionals are using wood to great
effect in a growing number of nonresidential
and multi-family building
types—in applications that range
from traditional to innovative, even
iconic. Some are driven by wood’s
cost effectiveness, while others cite
its versatility or low carbon footprint,
but their collective path has been
made possible by building codes that
increasingly recognize wood’s structural
and performance capabilities, and the
continued evolution of wood building
systems and techniques.
Think Wood - Looking Up: Tall Wood Buildings Around the World InfographicThink Wood
17 Tall Wood Buildings (7 stories or taller) have been built in the last 5 years and counting. Here are a few of the recent tall wood buildings constructed in the pas 5 years.
For more tall wood building information, please visit: https://www.thinkwood.com/
Think Wood - Taller Wood Buildings are Possible and Happening InfographicThink Wood
Taller wood projects are a reality, with more developers and architects opting for mass timber as a sustainable solution to attain safe, cost-effective, high-performing buildings in urban-dense settings.
To find out more, visit: https://www.thinkwood.com/
Survey of international tall wood buildings 2015 re think wood presentationThink Wood
Over the past several years, a number of tall wood projects have been completed around the world, demonstrating successful applications of new wood and mass timber technologies. This Summary Report of the Survey of International Tall Wood Buildings takes a look at ten international tall wood buildings, and presents some common lessons learned from the experiences of various stakeholders, including the Developer/Owner, Design Team, Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ), and Construction Team for each project.
Survey Appendices outline in-depth the lessons learned about the ten tall wood buildings covered in the survey. If you would like to receive the Survey Appendices, please visit: https://www.thinkwood.com/
Wood Scores A+ for Schools & Student HousingThink Wood
In educational facilities architects are called upon to achieve a wide range of objectives with limited budgets. An increasing number of designers are turning to wood-frame construction as a reasonable solution, it typically costs less while meeting all code and safety requirements. In addition, wood-frame construction offers advantages such as speed of construction, design versatility, and a light carbon footprint.
Wood in Buildings: Steps to Durability and LongevityThink Wood
Architects specify wood in their building designs for many reasons, including: cost, availability, ease of construction, thermal performance, aesthetics and design versatility. Research and new product development have only added to the versatility of building with wood. This presentation reviews how to use wood to its full potential. It discusses wood’s advantages in durability and longevity, while explaining issues of quality control for wood construction and the architect’s role in promoting such control. Finally, this explains how to maintain wood buildings and maximize performance.
Materials in Action - Examining the Impacts of Building Materials Think Wood
When an architect specifies a building material, that choice casts a long shadow. While most of the environmental effects from materials occur during the extraction and production phases, they continue to influence a structures' environmental footprint long afterwards, throughout the operations phase and beyond. This presentation evaluates the environmental impact of building materials wood, concrete and steel.
Materials Matter - Construction Materials and their Environmental CostsThink Wood
This presentation will show how the life cycle assessment makes it easier for architects to incorporate environmental considerations into their building material selection. It will discuss the life cycle impacts of wood, concrete and steel and demonstrate that over its life cycle, wood is better for the environment than steel or concrete in terms of embodied energy, air and water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, this presentation will highlight the advances each industry is making toward sustainability.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Wood Products and Green Building: Rating Systems Recognizing Wood’s Environmental Benefits
1. Wood Products
and Green
Building
Rating systems
increasingly
recognize wood’s
environmental
advantages
Earn 1 AIA/CES HSW learning unit and
1 GBCI hour for LEED Credential Maintenance
CEU Publish Date: June 2014
PhotobyDavidWakely
2. AIA Provider Number: K029 GBCI Provider: McGraw-Hill Publishers
AIA Course number: K1406C GBCI Course number: #910000367
AIA Credit: 1 HSW/SD hour GBCI Credit: 1 GBCI CMP hour
Best Practices
reThink Wood® sponsors this Continuing Education Unit provided by McGraw-Hill
Publishers. This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education.
As such, it does not contain content that may be deeded or construed to be an approval or
endorsement by the AIA of any material or method of construction, or any manner of
handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product.
Credit earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members.
Certificates of completion are available for self-reporting and record-keeping needs.
Questions related to the information presented should be directed to reThink Wood® upon
completing this program.
4. Learning Objectives
Discuss the sustainable aspects of wood products.
Describe how wood contributes to credits under various green building
rating systems.
Articulate the importance of life cycle assessment and how it can be
used to evaluate the environmental performance of buildings at the
design stage.
Describe how green building certification, sustainable forest
certification, and Environmental Product Declarations complement
each other to provide a more complete picture of a building’s
environmental performance.
5. Table of Contents
Section 3
LCA: Getting to a
Material’s Real
Green Quotient
Section 4
Wood and Carbon
Section 5
New Materials
Create New
Possibilities
Section 6
What the Future
Holds
Section 1
Green Rating
Systems, Codes
and Wood
Section 2
New Developments
in Green Building
Rating System &
Codes
7. LEED Platinum
Branson Commons – Ross, California
Architect: Turnbull Griffin Haesloop Architects
WoodWorks Institutional Wood Design Award, 2011
Photo by David Wakely
Approaches to Rating Green Buildings
8. Wood and Green Building
Rating Systems
Prescriptive-based rating
systems generally recognize
wood or wood products in the
following areas:
Certified wood
Recycled / reused / salvaged
materials
Local sourcing of materials
Materials efficiency
Indoor air quality
LEED Gold
Herrington Recovery Center
Oconomowoc, Wisconsin
Architect: TWP Architecture
WoodWorks Green Building with Wood Award, 2010
Photo: Curtis Waltz
9. Green Building to Code
Provisions of voluntary rating
systems are beginning to find their
way into building codes.
CALGreen provisions and model
code language within ASHRAE and
IgCC are similar to those in
voluntary green building rating
systems.
None require comprehensive
environmental certification of rapidly
renewable materials or of any other
construction material other than
wood.
10. Sustainable Forest Certification
Verifies that a forest
meets the requirements
of the certification
standard
Two international
umbrella organizations –
FSC and PEFC
More than 50 certification
standards
worldwide
12. LEED v.4
LEED Gold
Promega Feynman Center
The Crossroads – Madison, Wisconsin
Architect: Uihlein-Wilson Architects, Inc.
WoodWorks Innovative Engineering Wood Design Award, 2013
Photo by Aitor Sanchez/EwingCole
13. LEED Programs
Changes in Materials and Resources Portion
of LEED Programs – LEED 2009 to LEED v.4
LEED (2009) LEED v.4
Building and material reuse credits (walls,
floors, roof, interior elements)
Moved to Building Life Cycle Impact Reduction credit
Building life cycle impact reduction Added option for whole building LCA of structure and
enclosure
New credit, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization,
focuses on selecting products with improved life cycles;
rewards material optimization, disclosure, products with
EPDs, and use of local products (with local now defined as
a 100-mile radius)
Recycled content, rapidly renewable
materials, certified wood
Moved into Building Product Disclosure and Optimization –
Sourcing of Raw Materials
New credit, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization –
Sourcing of Raw Materials, rewards products from
manufacturers that provide information on land use
practices, extraction locations, labor practices, etc.
14. Green Globes v.1.3
Three Green Globes
Terrena – Northridge, California
Architect: TCA Architects
Developer: Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Photo by 360o Virtual Visions
15. BREEAM
BREEAM Industrial Outstanding Rating
DEFRA Lion House – Alnwick, Northumberland, UK
Architects: Gibberd (Client Design Team) and Frank Shaw
Associates (Design and Build Team)
Photo courtesy Frank Shaw Associates
16. Built GreenTM
Built Green 4-Star
Single Family Townhomes – Redmond, Washington
Photo courtesy BuiltGreen
17. EarthCraft
EarthCraft House Platinum Certification
Proud Green Home – Serenbe, Georgia
Developed by: Imery Group
2013 EarthCraft Project of the Year Winner
Photo courtesy Imery Group
18. Photo by Bruce Damonte
139 GreenPoints
Drs. Julian & Raye Richardson Apartments – San Francisco, California
Architect: David Baker Architects
WoodWorks Multi-Story Wood Design Award, 2011
GreenPoint
19. National Green Building Standard
NGBS Green Certified: Gold Level
Private Residence – Raleigh, North Carolina
Builder: Beaman Building and Realty, Inc.
Photos courtesy Beaman Bulding and Realty, Inc.
20. Earth Advantage
Photo by Christian Columbres Photography
Earth Advantage
Earth Advantage Gold
Reed College Performing Arts Building – Portland, Oregon
Architect: Opsis Architecture, LLP
WoodWorks Beauty of Wood Design Award, 2014
21. Living Building Challenge
Living Building Challenge: Certified Net Zero Energy Building
David & Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters – Los Altos, California
Architect: EHDD
WoodWorks Green Building with Wood Design Award, 2011
Photo: Jeremy Bittermann, courtesy EHDD
22. Robert Paine Scripps Forum for
Science, Society and the Environment
La Jolla, California
Architect: Safdie Rabines Architects
WoodWorks Institutional Wood Design Award, 2010
Photo: Anne Garrison
ASHRAE, IgCC and
CALGreen offer the option to
pursue either a prescriptive or
performance path.
Green Building Codes
24. Life Cycle Assessment
Growing number of LCA tools
have made it a viable option for
any designer.
Tools are user-friendly and low-
cost – most cases free
Source: Building Green With Wood www.naturallywood.com
25. Standardized, third-party-
verified label that
communicates the
environmental performance of
a product
Based on LCA and applicable
worldwide
Wood industry has been early
adopter of EPDs
www.awc.org
www.cwc.ca
EPDs on wood products
are available from:
Environmental Product
Declarations
26. Wood and LCA
LEED Silver
Willson Hospice House – Albany, Georgia
Architect: Perkins+Will
WoodWorks Institutional Wood Design Award, 2011
Photo by Jim Roof Creative Photography
27. COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF STEEL VS. WOOD DESIGN
(Values indicate magnitude of impact associated with steel design as multiple of wood design impact)
Fossil Fuel
Consumption
Weighted
Resource
Use
Global
Warming
Potential
Acidification
Potential
Human Health
Respiratory
Effects Potential
Eutrophication
Potential
Ozone
Depletion
Potential
Smog
Potential
1.4x 1.02x 1.6x 1.4x 1.3x 3.0x 1.5x 1.2x
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONCRETE VS. WOOD DESIGN
(Values indicate magnitude of impact associated with concrete design as multiple of wood design impact)
Fossil Fuel
Consumption
Weighted
Resource
Use
Global
Warming
Potential
Acidification
Potential
Human Health
Respiratory
Effects Potential
Eutrophication
Potential
Ozone
Depletion
Potential
Smog
Potential
1.9x 1.02x 1.6x 1.4x 1.3x 3.0x 1.5x 1.2x
Environmental Impacts Comparisons
Source: Athena EcoCalculator
29. Photo courtesy of Grant + Sinclair Architects
Sustainable Forestry Carbon Cycle
30. Photo: naturallywood.com
Environmental Advantage
Photo: Trinec Iron and Steel Works
Wood grows naturally and requires relatively little
additional energy to manufacture into products
Construction materials such as steel, cement and
glass requires temperatures of up to 3,500oF and
large quantities of energy to produce
31. Photo by WI Bell
El Dorado, Arkansas
Architect: CADM Architecture, Inc.
Carbon benefits calculated using the
WoodWorks Carbon Calculator8
33. CLT Panels
Photo courtesy of Land Lease
Forté in Melbourne, Australia, was the tallest
timber apartment in the world when it was
completed in 2012.
Photo courtesy of naturallywood.com
Engineered wood panel
3, 5 or 7 layers of dimension
lumber oriented at right angles
to one another then glued to
form structural panels
Exceptionally strong,
dimensionally stable and rigid
34. CLT in North America
Photo: naturallywood.com
Photo by Aitor Sanchez/EwingColePhoto: OMB Architects
Earth Sciences Building at the University of
British Columbia – LEED Gold-certified
For McMurray Airport– Blend of best
practices and approaches of various
green building rating systems
The Crossroads, part of the Promega
Feynman Center – LEED Gold-certified
With growing pressure to reduce the carbon footprint of the built environment, building designers are increasingly being called upon to balance functionality and cost objectives with reduced environmental impact. Wood can help to achieve that balance.
The choice to use wood as a green building material is intuitive. It’s abundant, renewable and recyclable, and has a lighter carbon footprint than other construction materials.1 Wood is also the only structural building material with third-party certification systems in place to verify that products have come from a sustainably managed resource.
In addition to its environmental benefits, wood’s natural beauty and warmth have a positive effect on building occupants. In one study, for example, the use of visual wood was shown to lower sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation, which is responsible for physiological stress responses in humans.2 As a result, an increasing number of architects are incorporating wood in their designs as a way to achieve goals such as improved productivity and performance in schools and offices, and better patient outcomes in hospitals.3
With all of these attributes, wood is well positioned as a key component of environmentally superior structures. Yet, early efforts to promote green construction resulted in highly variable treatment of wood in green building rating systems—which, at the time, were largely based on long lists of prescriptive standards, typically focused on single attributes such as recycled content. Such variability can still be seen in many of the green building programs in use today. However, these systems are increasingly moving away from prescriptive standards and toward reliance on systematic, multi-attribute assessment of building products, assemblies, and completed structures through life cycle assessment (LCA). The result is greater uniformity between programs and far greater robustness in evaluation, both of which serve to leverage the environmental advantages of wood.
Sources
1. Werner, F. and Richter, K. 2007, Wooden building products in comparative LCA: A literature review; A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products & Greenhouse Gas Impacts, FPInnovations, 2010
2. Wood and Human Health, FPInnovations; Consumer Visual Evaluation of Canadian Wood Species, FPInnovations, D. Fell, 2002; Appearance Wood Products and Psychological Wellbeing, Society of Wood Science and Technology, Rice J., Kozak Robert A., Meitner Michael J., and Cohen David H., 2006
3. Wood and Human Health, FPInnovations; C. Kelz1,2 Grote V.1,2, Moser M. 1,2 Interior wood use in classrooms reduces pupils’ stress levels, 1Institute of Physiology, Medical University of Graz, Austria; 2 HUMAN RESEARCH, Institute for Health, Technology and Prevention Research, Weiz, Austria; Human Response to Wood, Architectural Record CEU, reThink Wood
reThink Wood® sponsors this program provided by McGraw-Hill Publishers. While this is an AIA- and GBCI-approved program, the information presented is not intended to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA or GBCI of any product, material, or method of construction.
Credit earned upon completion of this program will be reported to AIA for AIA members. Certificates of completion are available for self-reporting and record-keeping needs.
Questions related to the information presented should be directed to reThinkWood® via email—info@rethinkwood.com—upon completion of this program.
This program is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Reuse of any portion of this program without written consent from reThink Wood® is prohibited.
4
5
6
Early green building rating initiatives in North America were based on lists of prescribed measures for reducing energy consumption and various environmental impacts. Among these were Built Green, Earthcraft, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), and the NAHB Model Green Home Building Guidelines—precursor to the National Green Building Standard. Arranged within categories such as Energy, Water, Indoor Air Quality, Materials and Resources, and Site, prescriptive lists of recommended or required measures outlined the path toward environmentally better buildings. Each measure typically addressed a single concern or attribute such as recycled, recycled content, rapidly renewable, and sourcing. Recommendations for improving environmental performance of buildings and construction practices varied among the initiatives, as did recommendations for the use of wood and wood products.
There has been a noticeable shift away from prescriptive measures and toward systematic, performance-based assessment using LCA. This shift is reflected in the latest version of LEED, Green Globes and several other rating systems, and is discussed later in this article.
Generally, every prescriptive-based rating system offers a certain percentage of credits that can be achieved with the use of wood or wood products. In most cases, wood is recognized in the following areas:
Certified wood. Credits are awarded for wood that has been third-party certified as coming from a sustainably managed forest. Different rating systems allow for different certification programs, with some more inclusive than others. While rating systems commonly reward projects that use certified wood, they do not require any demonstration that competitive materials such as concrete, steel, or plastic have come from a sustainable resource.
Recycled/reused/salvaged materials. Many rating systems give credits for the use of products with recycled content. Wood products that qualify include finger-jointed studs, medium-density fiberboard, and insulation board.
Local sourcing of materials. A number of systems place special emphasis on the use of local materials as an approach to reducing the environmental impacts of construction projects, rewarding materials sourced from within a certain radius—commonly 500 miles. However, simply tracking transportation distances ignores such critically important factors as mode of transportation and the type, efficiency, and impacts of manufacturing processes.
Helen Goodland, an expert in green building and principal of Brantwood Consulting Partnership, explains that “rather than focusing solely on transportation distances, rating systems should look at life cycle assessment methodology, which quantitatively analyzes not just transportation impacts, but the total environmental footprint of all materials and energy flows, either as input or output, over the life of a product from raw material to end-of-life disposal or reuse.”
Materials efficiency. Many rating systems, such as BREEAM, Built Green Canada, and Earthcraft, reward use of lower quantities of building materials. An example is credit availability for employing advanced wood framing systems.
Waste minimization. Credit is often awarded for avoiding or diverting construction waste—e.g., through jobsite protocols that include pre-cut packages or off-site production of building modules.
Indoor air quality. Most rating systems limit or prohibit added urea formaldehyde and have strict limits on the use of products that contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Many wood products are available that verifiably meet or exceed these guidelines.
Given broad interest in reducing the environmental impacts of buildings and their construction, it is not surprising that provisions of voluntary green building rating systems are beginning to find their way into building codes. The State of California became the first state to codify green building provisions with its California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), which applies to all occupancies within the state. Model code language has also been developed in the form of ASHRAE 189.1 and the International Green Construction Code (IgCC). Washington, D.C., for example, has adopted the 189.1 standard as part of its city building code, while Florida requires compliance with the IgCC in the construction of state-owned buildings. Other states and municipalities, such as Maryland, Rhode Island, Phoenix, and Scottsdale, have endorsed the use of the IgCC on a voluntary basis.
CALGreen provisions and model code language within the ASHRAE and IgCC standards are similar to those in voluntary green building rating systems. However, a comparison of all three shows greater incentive for wood use under the IgCC than CALGreen or the ASHRAE standard. For example:
The Materials Selection section of the IgCC standard specifies that at least 55 percent of the total materials used in each building project (based on mass, volume, or cost) must be any combination of used, recycled-content, or recyclable materials, or bio-based materials, where the bio-based content is not less than 75 percent and where wood materials are environmentally certified.
ASHRAE 189.1 contains a similar requirement, specifying that at least 45 percent of materials must be low-impact materials, with low impact defined as recycled content, regional, or bio-based materials; bio-based materials are required to comprise a minimum of 5 percent of the total cost of materials.
CALGreen awards voluntary credits for the use of bio-based materials.
All of these initiatives emphasize use of rapidly renewable materials, defined as materials that renew in 10 years or less, rather than 11 years or more (i.e., they favor materials other than wood), although they also reward the use of certified wood. None of these programs require comprehensive environmental certification of rapidly renewable materials or of any construction material other than wood.
There are four primary forest certification programs operating in North America today: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI), Canadian Standards Association’s Sustainable Forest Management Standards (CSA), and American Tree Farm System (ATFS). All but FSC are endorsed by the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), an independent, non-profit umbrella organization that supports sustainable forest management globally by assessing and endorsing national forest certification standards.
Certification in all cases requires third-party verification against a published, transparent standard. Certification under these programs is separate from the green rating systems that require their use, and different also from the Environmental Product Declarations discussed in this course.
11
LEED v.4.
LEED® – This building rating and certification program was developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) and provides third-party verification that a building or community was designed and built in accordance with specified practices and performance measures within eight categories. Adherence to required elements and numerical scores across all categories is used in determining an overall project rating. Established in 2000, LEED has been used to certify more than 2.8 billion ft2 of building space globally. The newest version (v.4) was released in 2013. LEED Canada operates independently from the USGBC, and is governed and operated by the Canadian Green Building Council.
In the Materials and Resources category of LEED v.4 (2013), prescriptive measures that were part of the previous version of the system—for material reuse, recycled content, and rapidly renewable materials—have been replaced with optional credits related to LCA, LCA-based environmental product declarations (EPDs), material ingredient verification, and raw material extraction. EPDs need only be collected to gain credit; there is no requirement that they be understood or acted upon, though such requirements will presumably appear in a subsequent version of LEED. Prescriptive elements also remain.
According to Dr. Jim Bowyer, director of the Responsible Materials Program at Dovetail Partners, “The two rating systems that have long incorporated systematic assessment into their programs—BREEAM and Green Globes—have more robust LCA provisions.”
Green Globes v.1.3.
Green Globes™ – This rating system began in Canada as an offshoot of BREEAM. The Green Building Initiative (GBI) acquired the rights to distribute Green Globes in the United States in 2004 and, in 2005, became the first green building organization accredited as a standards developer by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The Green Globes program encompasses new construction and continuous improvement in office buildings, multifamily structures, hospitals, and institutional buildings. A web-based tool allows self-assessment of building projects, with third-party on-site inspection required for certification. Green Globes is one of two rating systems approved by the U.S. government for accreditation of federal building projects. In Canada, it is the basis for the Building Owners and Managers Association of Canada’s (BOMA) “BESt” rating system for existing commercial buildings.
The newest version of Green Globes (version 1.3, 2014) offers two paths to satisfying material selection requirements. One option is to conduct LCAs in the conceptual design phase of at least two building designs (core and shell including envelope), with selection of the lowest impact option. Alternatively, EPDs that comply with standards put forth by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), third-party certifications to multi-attribute consensus-based standards, and/or third-party-certified, ISO-compliant life cycle product analyses focused on appropriate characteristics for the building system or application must be used as a basis for selection of specified products.
BREEAM
The UK-based Building Research Establishment’s (BRE) Environmental Assessment Method has rating systems for ten different building types. Within each, assessment of performance occurs within ten categories. Scores across all categories are added together to produce a single overall score that, along with evidence of compliance with specific requirements, determines the overall project rating. Established in 1990, BREEAM is one of the world’s most widely used green building rating systems with over 250,000 certified buildings.
Within the Materials section of BREEAM, credits are awarded on the basis of a building’s quantified environmental life cycle impact through assessment of the main building elements—i.e., exterior walls, windows, roof, upper floors, internal walls, and floor coverings and finish. Impacts can be quantified either through use of an ISO-compliant LCA tool (wherein building designers must demonstrate that they know how to use the LCA tool and document how the building design has benefitted from its use), or through selection of building components based on either an LCA-based Green Guide developed and maintained by BRE, and/or ISO-compliant EPDs. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions (in kilograms of carbon dioxide, or CO2 equivalent) for each element must also be reported based on a 60-year building life.
Built Green™
This voluntary program for residential construction was developed in the mid-1990s by home builders in Colorado and by home builders and government in Washington. Individual programs are administered by local home builder associations. Using a checklist-based system, Built Green offers certification of single and multifamily residences, with the highest levels of certification typically requiring third-party verification. In Canada, Built Green is owned and managed by the Built Green Society of Canada. There, the system is open to members of participating home builder associations and certification is available for new single-family homes and row homes, high density housing, and renovation projects. A communities program is under development.
EarthCraft
Established in 1999 by the Greater Atlanta Home Builders Association and Southface, EarthCraft is a green building certification program serving Georgia, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina, and South Carolina. The rating system encompasses single-family homes, multifamily structures, renovation projects, community developments and light-commercial buildings. To date, more than 25,000 homes, multifamily units and commercial buildings have been certified. Provisions within this standard are similar to those in LEED 2009.
GreenPoint is an independent rating system in California, similar to LEED for Homes Multifamily Midrise.
National Green Building Standard
In 2007, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and International Code Council (ICC) joined forces to establish an environmental standard for residential construction. The result was a voluntary standard that includes single and multifamily homes, residential remodeling and site development projects. Based on earlier-developed NAHB Model Green Home Building Guidelines, the standard gained ANSI approval as ICC-700 in early 2009. The IgCC, a model code, requires compliance with ICC-700 if a jurisdiction chooses to regulate residential buildings four stories or less in height.
Earth Advantage – The Earth Advantage program is administered by the Earth Advantage Institute, an organization that began in 2000 as an energy-efficiency program of Pacific Gas and Electric. In 2005 it became an independent nonprofit entity. The Institute provides training, research, and certification services to building professionals across the U.S. Residential certification programs include net zero, new home, multifamily and remodel. A commercial certification program focuses on buildings of less than 50,000 ft2, but accommodates buildings up to 100,000 ft2. The standards reference the ASHRA E 90.1 energy code and additional standards and tools including Forest Stewardship Council, GreenGuard®, and Green Seal.
Living Building Challenge – This program of the Cascadia Green Building Council (a chapter of both the USGBC and Canadian Green Building Council) was developed in 2006. Now administered by the International Living Building Institute, it is meant to be the next step after LEED Platinum and a step before regenerative buildings. It is intended “to define the highest measure of sustainability attainable in the built environment based on the best current thinking—recognizing that ‘true sustainability’ is not yet possible.” As of spring 2014, five projects have achieved full certification, and five others have achieved net zero energy building certification.
The shift toward performance-based assessment is also reflected in ASHRAE 189.1, the IgCC, and CALGreen.
CALGreen – CALGreen is a part of the California Building Code and applies, with few exceptions, to all occupancies in the state. Put into effect in 2011, it is the first statewide green building code. To meet code requirements, projects must satisfy mandatory elements, exceed California Energy Code requirements, and comply with a certain number of provisions on a voluntary measures list. Local jurisdictions are allowed to establish more restrictive standards.
IgCC – The IgCC is not a green rating system, but a model code intended to promote safe and sustainable construction in an integrated fashion with the ICC family of codes, including provisions of the International Energy Conservation Code and ICC-700. ASHRAE Standard 189.1 is also incorporated as an alternate path to compliance. The IgCC was published in 2012 after three years of development and consultation. The document provides model code language to states and municipalities that wish to establish a regulatory framework specific to green commercial construction and remodeling. Code language establishes minimum regulations for building systems and site considerations through both prescriptive and performance-related provisions.
ASHRAE Standard 189.1 – An ANSI standard written in model code language, ASHRAE 189.1 provides minimum requirements for high-performance green buildings, and applies to construction of all new and remodeled commercial buildings. Developed jointly by ASHRAE, the USGBC, and the Illuminating Engineering Society, it serves as a compliance option in the 2012 IgCC.
The ASHRAE guidelines provide alternative prescriptive and performance pathways. The performance option requires that LCAs be conducted for a minimum of two building design alternatives. Assessment must demonstrate at least a 5 percent improvement in at least two categories, including land use (or habitat alteration), resource use, climate change, ozone depletion potential, human health effects, eco-toxicity, eutrophication, acidification, or smog. Completion of an LCA eliminates the need to adhere to prescriptive low-impact material requirements outlined earlier.
Similarly, the IgCC guidelines also offer the option to pursue either a prescriptive or performance path. Here, choice of the performance pathway requires a whole building LCA and demonstration that a given project achieves not less than a 20 percent improvement in environmental performance as compared to a reference design of similar usable floor area, function, and configuration that meets the minimum energy requirements of IgCC and structural requirements of the International Building Code. Environmental performance improvement is required in global warming potential and at least two of the following impact measures: primary energy use, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential, and smog potential. As with the ASHRAE program, fulfillment of this requirement eliminates the need to document adherence to a number of prescriptive elements related to material selection. CALGreen contains a similar provision.
23
Tracking products and co-products through a supply chain and properly allocating resource use, emissions and wastes to various outputs can indeed be complicated and expensive. However, a growing number of LCA tools have made LCA a viable option for any designer. User-friendly, low-cost (in most cases free) tools, such as the Athena Impact Estimator for Buildings (IE), provide life cycle impact information for an extensive range of generic building assemblies, or designers can choose to undertake full building analyses. LCA-based data is also available in the form of standardized, easy-to-understand EPDs for a wide range of products.
The wood industry has been a leader in the development of Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs).
An EPD is a standardized, third-party-verified label that communicates the environmental performance of a product, is based on LCA, and is applicable worldwide.
An EPD includes information about both product attributes and production impacts and provides consistent and comparable information to industrial customers and end-use consumers regarding environmental impacts. The nature of EPDs also allows summation of environmental impacts along a product’s supply chain—a powerful feature that greatly enhances the utility of LCA-based information.
In the case of wood products, sustainable forest management certification complements the information in an EPD, providing a more complete picture by encompassing parameters not covered in an LCA—such as biodiversity conservation, soil and water quality, and the protection of wildlife habitat.
EPDs for wood products are available from the American Wood Council (www.awc.org) and Canadian Wood Council (www.cwc.org). For more information on EPDs, see the continuing education course Wood and Environmental Product Declarations.4
Source:
4. http://continuingeducation.construction.com/article.php?L=312&C=1116&P=1
Increased use of LCA in the evaluation of building design alternatives and material selection greatly favors wood in all types of construction, since environmental impacts across the full spectrum of indicators tend to be significantly lower for wood products than alternative materials.5 Scientific comparisons of functionally equivalent buildings, components, and subassemblies have been remarkably consistent in this regard, with wood almost invariably found to be the low-impact option.
Source:
5. Building Materials in the Context of Residential Construction – Phase I, Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials, 2005; Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials in the Context of Residential Construction – Phase II, Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials, 2010
As an example of the environmental performance of wood structures in comparison to those constructed of other materials, a highly regarded and commonly used LCA tool, the Athena Eco-Calculator, was used to evaluate three alternative configurations of a simple building. Designed for the Atlanta geographical area, the building footprint was 20,000 ft2 (100 ft x 200 ft). Two stories in height, the structure was 20 feet tall with 40,000 ft2 of total floor area. To simplify analysis and comparison of materials in particular, the theoretical building was analyzed without windows, doors, or internal partitions. Of the three configurations, one was wood, one steel, and one concrete. All were assumed built on a concrete foundation and slab.
This analysis involved systematic assessment using life cycle methodology of all building assemblies beginning with raw material extraction through primary and secondary manufacturing, transport at all stages of the production chain and to the job site, and building construction. Differences among the wood, steel, and concrete structures are shown in the tables on the slide.
Impacts associated with the steel design as compared to the wood design are mostly 1.3 to 1.6 times greater, with a range of 1.02 to 3.0 times. Lower impacts are indicated for the wood design in every impact category. Comparison of the concrete vs. wood design shows even greater differences. In this case, environmental impacts associated with the concrete design range from 1.9 to 5.8 times greater than for the wood design. Again, impacts across all indicators are lower for the wood design. The impact categories in the tables closely match those specified in rating tools and code language where use of LCA is encouraged or rewarded.
One reality consistently revealed by LCA is the low embodied energy in wood structures compared to those built of steel or concrete.6 The term ‘embodied energy’ refers to the total consumption of energy linked to production of a building, including resource extraction, manufacturing, transport, and installation of building materials. According to Dr. Bowyer, “The embodied energy of wood assemblies has consistently been found to be 20 to 70 percent lower than functionally equivalent steel or concrete assemblies.”
Comparison of the environmental impact measures linked to material selection obtained through LCA (tables above) and material selection factors typically considered in prescriptive-based rating systems reveals a startling reality. None of the prescriptive-based rating systems reward superior performance, or even consider in building material selection, such things as fossil fuel consumption, global warming potential, total resource use, non-renewable resource consumption, acidification or eutrophication potential, ozone depletion, smog potential, or water use. The reason is that any rating system that does not incorporate LCA or LCA-based tools and information does not have the capacity to consider these things. The same is true of prescriptive pathways within systems that do incorporate LCA and LCA-based tools and information, but do not require their use.
Source:
6. A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products & Greenhouse Gas Impacts, FPInnovations, 2010
28
In the process of photosynthesis, trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, release the oxygen and incorporate the carbon into their trunks, branches, leaves and root systems. Trees that decompose and die in the forest release this carbon back into the atmosphere slowly, and it is released more quickly in forests that succumb to insects, disease or wildfire. However, if the trees are harvested and manufactured into lumber and other forest products, these products continue to store carbon while the forest regenerates and once again begins absorbing CO2. In the case of buildings, this carbon is stored for the lifetime of the structure—or longer, since wood also lends itself to adaptation, salvage and re-use. Wood can also be used as a low-carbon substitute for fossil energy.
The second aspect to wood’s relatively light carbon footprint is that it grows naturally and requires relatively little additional energy to manufacture into products. This gives wood an environmental advantage over construction materials such as steel, cement and glass, the production of which requires temperatures of up to 3,500° F and large quantities of energy, resulting in substantial greenhouse gas emissions.7
Source:
7. A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products & Greenhouse Gas Impacts, FPInnovations, 2010
Taking advantage of wood’s carbon and other environmental benefits in building construction comes with a bonus—namely that, in many cases, wood construction is less expensive than other building solutions. For example, changing the design of El Dorado High School from steel and masonry to wood reduced the cost of the project by $2.7 million (U.S.)—while achieving a carbon benefit of 11,440 metric tons (see carbon chart in slide).
Source:
8. Estimated by the WoodWorks Carbon Calculator (www.woodworks.org), based on research by Sarthre, R. and J. O’Connor, 2010, A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products and Greenhouse Gas Impacts, FPInnovations. Note: CO2 on the chart refers to CO2 equivalent.
32
The emergence of cross laminated timber (CLT) and other mass timber products is allowing designers to create a broader range of lower-impact structures. Internationally, for example, CLT’s relatively light carbon footprint is helping to drive a trend toward taller buildings, such as the eight-story Bridport House in the United Kingdom and the 10-story Forté in Australia.
Although relatively new in North America, CLT has been used in a variety of building designs, from the LEED Gold-certified Earth Sciences Building at the University of British Columbia to the new Fort McMurray Airport, where designers have taken a “first principles” approach to sustainability, blending best practice with the monitoring approaches of various green building rating systems. In the U.S., examples include the The Crossroads, which is part of the LEED Gold-certified Promega Feynman Center in Wisconsin.
With growing concerns over climate change and the environmental impact of buildings, it stands to reason that green building concepts will be increasingly incorporated into structures of all kinds. What began as an interest in reducing energy consumption to save money in the 1970s has led to today’s net zero energy objectives, and net zero carbon is another frontier. With attention turning away from the prescriptive approach to sustainable design and toward LCA-based tools that identify the lowest impact alternatives, more designers will become familiar with the environmental advantages of wood, and wood products will be a building material of choice for a growing range of applications.
Ready to take the Online Continuing Education Unit (CEU) test? You can earn 1.00 HSW credit for LEED Credential Maintenance. Click on the button above, or go to: http://continuingeducation.construction.com/article.php?L=312&C=1213&P=1
Thank you for your time. Visit www.rethinkwood.com for more information, or email info@rethinkwood.com with any questions.