URINE DRUG
SCREENING
HossamaldinAlzawawi
R4 - Clinical Pathology Resident
Definition
Drug testing is the evaluation of a urine, blood or
other type of biological sample to determine if the
subject has been using the drug or drugs in
question. There are many circumstances that may
lead to drug testing.
(2019). "Drug screening - Latest research and news | Nature." from
https://www.nature.com/subjects/drug-screening.
A drug screen (also called a drug test) is the
collection and analysis of blood, urine, hair, or
saliva to detect the presence of the chemicals and
contaminants left behind in the body due to drug
use. A drug screen may also be used to detect
performance-enhancing drugs sometimes used by
professional athletes such as steroids and HGH.
Many different types of drug screens exist for
multiple purposes.
(2019). "What is a Drug Screen?". 2019, from
https://www.concentra.com/resource-center/articles/what-is-a-drug-
screen
Reasons for Drug
Screening
■ Onsite drug screening is performed for a variety of medical, professional and
legal reasons. A few scenarios in which screening may be done are:
– Pre-employment
– Suspicion of drug abuse
– Military service, sports participation
– Legal, criminal
– Drug-therapy compliance monitoring
– Drug abuse rehabilitating monitoring
– Postmortem investigation
Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of
Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from
https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and-
sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
SubstancesTested in a Drug Screening
Most commonly substances
Amphetamines
Cannabinoid metabolites
Cocaine metabolites
opiate metabolites
phencyclidine (PCP)
Expanded immunoassays
Tricyclic antidepressants
Barbiturate
Methadone
Alcohol
Benzodiazepines
Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at
Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-
practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
SPECIMEN
COLLECTION
AND
HANDLING
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC
BY-NC-ND
Specimen Collection and Handling:
Guidelines
THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PATHOLOGISTS
HAS PUBLISHED GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING
MEDICOLEGAL SPECIMENS AND PRESERVING
THE CHAIN OF EVIDENCE
THE FACULTY OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL
MEDICINE HAS PUBLISHED
RECOMMENDATION FOR THE COLLECTION
FOR FORENSIC SPECIMENS FROM
COMPLAINANTS AND SUSPECTS
THE EUROPEAN WORKPLACE DRUG TESTING
SOCIETY HAS PUBLISHED GUIDELINES ON
THE COLLECTION OF URINE, ORAL FLUID AND
HAIR.
COOPER, A. N. A. G. (2013). CLARKE'S ANALYTICAL FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY INDIA:
PHARMACEUTICAL PRESS.
Specimen Collection and Handling:
SpecimensTypes
Bodily specimen that can be tested include urine, blood, hair, sweat, or saliva
Currently, urine remains the ideal specimen to test for clinical purposes because it has the most published
scientific data.
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the CurrentOpioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-
2104.
Specimen Collection and
Handling:
Blood Specimens
■ Advantages:
– Widely accepted matrix:
■ Provides unique advantages over other matrices in terms of the wide variety of analytical
methodologies available
– Determines recent drug use (hours, days)
■ Determination of patent drug and metabolite concentrations (and their ratios) may also yield
useful information pertaining to acute or chronic use
– Related to pharmacological effect
– Not readily adulterated
– The interpretive value of the matrix from a pharmacological standpoint.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Specimen Collection and
Handling:
Blood Specimens
■ Disadvantages
– Invasive collection
– Collection requiring medical personnel
– Shorter detection time
– Marked difference between antemortem and postmortem analyte concentration.
■ Antemortem and postmortem blood samples are notably different, and the site of
the postmortem blood draw (central or peripheral) can be of critical importance
– Require specialized antiseptic collection:
■ Non-alcohol-containing antiseptic wipes such as betadine (povidone-iodine) are
preferred to avoid any contamination that could interfere with alcohol analysis.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
SpecimenCollection and
Handling:
Urine Specimens
■ Advantage
– Widely accepted matrix:
– Valuable specimen for both antemortem and postmortem
drug testing because it is relatively uncomplicated matrix
– Easy collection
– Plentiful supply
– Amenable to automated analysis
– Longer detection window than blood (days to weeks)
– Extensive reference data
■ has the vast amount of published reference data for both
antemortem and postmortem drug concentrations
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
SpecimenCollection and
Handling:
Urine Specimens
■ Disadvantage
– Potential for donor manipulation
– Minimal parent drug
– Not useful for quantitative analysis
– Not related to impairment or pharmacological
effect
■ The multiplicity of factors influencing urine drug
concentrations (urine volume, clearance,
metabolism, pH, and time of last void) generally
means that, in isolation, these results have
limited quantitative value.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
SpecimenCollection and
Handling:
Urine Specimens
■ Collection
– mid-stream urine sample is usually collected
into a plastic container containing sodium
fluoride as preservative
It is necessary to take precautions against specimen adulteration Cooper,
A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India:
Pharmaceutical Press.
SpecimenCollection and
Handling:
Urine Specimens
■ Consideration
– Urine concentration are dependent upon
physiology and do not correlate with dose or
serum concentrations.These result should not
be used for therapeutic drug monitoring
UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery;
October 18, 2011
Specimen Collection and
Handling:
Time
■ Timing is an important factor in specimen collection:
– Particularly in antemortem cases where some
drugs have short detection times and therefore
limited detection windows
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic
Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Specimen Collection and Handling:
Containers Handling, Labeling andTransfer
All samples should be
properly marked for:
Identification with the caser
number, donor name, date and
time o collection, signature or
initials of the collector and
specimen discerption.
All samples containers
should have:
Taper-proof containers and / or
tape bearing the collector’s
initials and date of collection
should be used.
All samples transfer to
laboratory should be:
Forwarded to the laboratory in
appropriate leak-proof and
tamper-proof packaging/
shipping materials with all
appropriate documentation
“chain-of-custody”
All samples received by
laboratory should be:
Inspected and appropriated
documented in terms of
condition and quantity during
the accessioning process. Cooper,
A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's
Analytical Forensic Toxicology
India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Specimen Collection and
Handling:
Containers
■ Container specifications
– The specimen container should be appropriate for the intended use and
does not compromise the analytical finding
– Container size should be appropriate for the volume or weight of the
specimen so that the headspace is minimized.
■ Container headspace undesired effects: Excessive headspace in
the container can increase the chance of oxidative loss,
volatilization of analytes (e.g. ethanol, and other low-boiling
point compounds.)
– Some analytes have a tendency to adhere to plastic or glass surfaces
depending on their physiochemical properties.
–
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India:
Pharmaceutical Press.
Specimen Collection and
Handling:
Containers
It is a good laboratory practice
to evaluate all new specimen
container prior to routine use
in the laboratory.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India:
Pharmaceutical Press.
Sample Handling,
Preservation and Storage
■ Specimens should be stored at appropriate
temperature with adequate preservative and in an
environment accessible only to authorized
personnel to ensure security and integrity.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Sample Preservation and Storage:
Storage
Short-term storage: recommendation for most samples is to be stored at
refrigerated temperature (4C)
Long-term storage: recommended for storage of tow weeks or more
periods and is carried at (-20C or lower)
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India:
Pharmaceutical Press.
Sample Preservation and Storage:
Preservation
Sodium fluoride (2% w/v) - Blood Samples
is a routine in most laboratories. Commercial evacuated blood
collection tubes (e.g. grey-top tubes) contain sodium fluoride as
the preservative and potassium oxalate as the anticoagulant
Inhibition of microorganisms and enzymes with sodium fluoride is
important for commonly encountered analytes such as ethanol,
cocaine and others.
Fluoride acts as an enzyme inhibitor and helps prevent glycolysis.
Potassium oxalate - Blood Samples
Considered as the preferred anticoagulant over other alternatives
such as EDTA, heparin or citrate
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology
India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Sample Preservation and Storage:
Preservation
Antioxidants
Such as ascorbic acid (0.25%) or sodium
metabisulfite (1% w/v) are sometimes used to
prevent oxidative loss
Theses agents have the potential to act as reducing
agents towards some drugs, in particular N-oxide
metabolites, which may be transformed into the
parent drug
pH adjustment:
Adjustment of specimen pH is not generally
favored routinely as some drugs alkali labile, while
others are acid labile
Antimicrobial, SodiumAzide (0.1%
v/w)
Used sometime as a preservative and antimicrobial
agent in urine samples
Should not be used if samples are to be analyzed by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay because it
can interfere with horseradish peroxidase-mediated
colorimetric detection Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013).
Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India:
Pharmaceutical Press.
Specimen Stability:
Intro
• the physiochemical properties of the drug, characteristics of the specimen or matrix, tendency to
conjugate/ deconjugate, specimen collection procedure, container selection, and the use of preservatives
or other additives
Drug stability can be influenced by many factors including
• Specimen pH and the presence of other substances in addition to external factors
• Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Drug instability is often matrix dependent and influenced by factors such as
Specimen Stability:
Analyte Alternation
In general drug instability in any
toxicological specimen is due to
metabolic degradation, chemical transformation,
or a combination of both.
After a specimen has been collected,
enzymes may remain active and
continue to degrade or transform the
drug in vitro.
In general, drug instability arises as a
result of moieties or functional
groups that are susceptible to
Transformation, such as ester (e.g. 6-
acetylmorphine, cocaine, acetylsalicylic acid),
sulfur-containing drugs, photolabile drugs (e.g.
phenothiazines, midazolam, lysergic acid
diethylamide) or those with functional groups
that are readily oxidized or reduced.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic
Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Specimen Stability:
Analyte Alternation
Depending on the collection, storage, use of preservative, container type,
storage conditions, use of preservative, container type, matrix and other
factors, the concentration of a drug at the time of assay may not be
identical to the concentration at the time of collection, all toxicological
results should be interpreted within this context
Some drugs also exhibit a degree of thermal instability, this is a
consideration for drugs that are subjected to elevated temperatures during
administration (e.g. by smoking), and during analysis (e.g. GC-MS)
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical
Press.
WhatTest to
Perform
To get the most comprehensive results,
clinicians should order both a an
immunoassay screening (IAS) followed by a
confirmatory mass-spectrometry urine drug
test (UDT).
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic."
Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
WhatTest to
Perform
Confirmatory urine drug test, Gas or Liquid
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, has a
lower threshold of detectability and provides
both qualitative and quantitative
information.
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid
Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
WhatTest to
Perform
Clinicians should understand that
immunoassay screens have high false-
positive and false-negative rates.
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic."
Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
Confirmatory Urine DrugTest
Confirmatory UDT involves laboratory-based
testing utilize the techniques of gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), or
liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
Chromatography separates the analytes in a specimen,
mass spectrometry unequivocally identifies the relevant
analytes by their mass to charge ratio.
Both GC-MS and LC-MS provide quantitative information about individually identified opiates, opioids, and
their respective metabolites
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
Confirmatory Urine DrugTest
Confirmatory test advantage
The ability of GC-MS and LC-MS to provide both
a qualitative and quantitative answer about the
parent drug and metabolite means equivocal
IAS results can be potentially resolved, thereby
decreasing the likelihood for false-positive
results
Confirmatory test disadvantage
Its limitations of being available only as a
laboratory-based test that has a turn around
time of hours to days.
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid
Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
Immunoassay Screens
IAS IS ONLY A QUALITATIVE
TEST THAT LOOKS FOR
WHICH DRUG/ DRUG
CLASSES ARE PRESENT
VERSUS ABSENT.
at minimum the majority of
IASs look for amphetamine,
cocaine, marijuana, PCP , and
opiates (limited to codeine,
morphine, and 6-
monoacetyl-morphine to test
for heroin use)
IN THE PAIN MANAGEMENT
THE TESTING PANEL
SHOULD BE CUSTOMIZED
TO ALSO INCLUDE
BENZODIAZEPINES,
BARBITURATES,
METHAMPHETAMINE,
SEMISYNTHETIC OPIOIDS,
METHADONE, AND
BUPRENORPHINE.
MAHAJAN, G. (2017). "ROLE OF URINE DRUG
TESTING IN THE CURRENT OPIOID
EPIDEMIC." ANESTH ANALG 125(6): 2094-
2104.
Immunoassay Screens
The immunoassay is the most commonly used Urine
Drug Screening because it is inexpensive and rapid.
Five different immunoassays are available
Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA)
Enzyme-multiplied immunoassay (EMIT)
Fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FIPA)
Kinetic interaction of microparticle in solution (KIMS)
Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from
https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information-
group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
Immunoassay
Screens
■ IASs suffer from added limitations that include
– Cross-reactivity with other drugs and substances that can lead to higher false-positive
results
– The inability to distinguish a positive opiate result as being due to codeine versus morphine
versus heroin versus and other combination of the aforementioned
– The inconsistency or inability to detect semisynthetic opioids (hydrocodone,
hydromorphone, oxycodone, oxymorphone,, buprenorphine) and synthetic opioids
(fentanyl, meperidine, methadone, and pentazocine)
– Higher thresholds of detection that can potentially cause one to falsely conclude that a
substance is absent when it is truly present
– While an IAS reliably detects opiate, it inconsistently identifies the presence of
semisynthetic opioids and synthetic opioid
– IAS generally does not detect opioid metabolites from the cytochrome P450 enzyme
system
– The inability to accurately conclude whether the identification of both the parent drug and
its active metabolite means the patient is compliant versus the identification of the “active
metabolite” really represents surreptitious of a nonprescribed opioid and the patient is
noncompliant.
– Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth
Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
Immunoassay
Screens
■ IASs suffer from added limitations that include
– They are considered as screening assay and yield
qualitative, class specific information.
– Specific drugs within a class are not identified
using these methods.
– These assays vary in their ability to detect parent
compounds and metabolites.
– These assays carries the possibilities of slight
variations due to change in reagents lots
– UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery;October 18, 2011
Immunoassay Screens
There are a number of advantages for always including
IASs:
Low cost
Identification of illicit substances
Potential acquisition of results in minutes to hours to enable one to make
more immediate intervention
Ultimately, clinicians must understand that all AISs are
only helpful for making preliminary treatment decisions
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid
Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
Immunoassay Screens
Criteria for Legitimate Urine Samples
Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from
https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
Urine should be collected in a tamper-evident container under supervision if
necessary.Criteria for legitimate urine samples include
A volume of
30mL or more
Temperature
between 32C
and 38C
pH of 4.5 to
8.5
Nitrates < 500
mcg/mL
Specific
gravity >1.002
and <1.020
Creatinine >
mg/dL
Immunoassay Screens
False-Negative Results
Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-
practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
False negatives are uncommon but can occur as a result of low
concentrations in the urine, tampering, and other situation
Dilute urine
(excess fluid
intake, diuretic
use, pediatric
sample)
Infrequent drug
use
Prolonged time
since last use
Recent
ingestion
Insufficient
quantity
ingested
Metabolic
factors
Inappropriate
test used
Elevated urine
lactate
Tampering
(discussed
later)
Immunoassay Screens
False-Positive Result
There are examples of interfering substances producing
false positive results include
Opiates may be falsely detected due to poppy seed ingestion (low
concentration detected)
Heroin and hydrocodone are metabolized into morphine and
hydromorphone respectively, and GC-MS may identify the metabolites
rather than the parent compound.
Immunoassay results for cannabinoid and cocaine
metabolites are associated with very few false-positives
while immunoassay results for amphetamines and
opiates are associated with a higher number of false-
positive
Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of
Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from
https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and-
sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
SAMPLE
CONTAMINATIO
N
Legitimate Sample
■ The normal temperature rage is 32C -38C.
■ A specimen may be considered invalid if the pH is between 3
and 4.5 or between 9 and 11.
– The specimen may be adulterated if the pH is less than 3
or greater than 11
■ A specimen is considered diluted if the creatinine
concentration is less than 200mg/L and the specific gravity is
less than 1.003
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology
India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Exogenous Contaminants
Phthalate Interferences
■ SPECIMENS COLLECTED INTO PLASTIC CONTAINERS ARE SOMETIMES SUSCEPTIBLE TO
PHTHALATE INTERFERENCES
■ NUMEROUS PLASTICIZER INTERFERENCES SUCH AS DIBUTYL PHTHALATE MAY CO-
EXTRACT AND INTERFERE WITH ANALYTICAL DETECTION BY GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHIC OR
MASS-SPECTROMETRIC TECHNIQUES, YIELDING CHARACTERISTIC PHTHALATE IONS.
■ ALL PLASTIC CONTAINERS SHOULD BE EVALUATED PRIOR TO WIDESPREAD
IMPLEMENTATION
■ ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO THESE SUBSTANCES FROM HOUSEHOLD ITEMS, FOOD,
BEVERAGE AND OTHER SOURCES CAN PRODUCE DETECTABLE QUANTITIES OF
PHTHALATE ESTERS OR THEIR METABOLITE IN BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS INCLUDING
BLOOD, SERUM, URINE AND BREAST MILK
COOPER, A. N. A. G. (2013). CLARKE'S ANALYTICAL FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY INDIA:
PHARMACEUTICAL PRESS.
Exogenous Contaminants
Samples Adulteration
■ How to Subvert the Tests
– Clinician should always be aware that adulteration might be a possibility
– Scientists at quest diagnostics discovered that patient had adulterated about 1.5% of analyzed
samples through
■ Diluting them 60%
■ Adding an oxidant 21%
■ Substituting an alternate specimen 12%
■ Adding some other adulterant 7%
– Various strategies can e implemented either before or at the time the patient submits a
specimen.
– To obtain the most concentrated specimen, have the patient submit a morning specimen
– To ensure the specimen has not been adulterated, clinician should ask the laboratory to perform
validity testing.
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-
2104.
Exogenous Contaminants
Samples Adulteration
■ Principal concern with antemortem contamination arises from the intentional manipulation of
the sample to mask the presence of drugs.
■ This include substitution, dilution or adulteration of the biological specimen with a foreign
substance.
– In general, in vitro adulteration can interfere with presumptive immunoassay tests,
with the intention of producing false-negative results.
– In vitro adulteration agents: Ascorbic acid, Alcohol, Amber-13 (hydrochloric acid),
ammonia, etc.…)
– On site or dipstick tests are available for nitrite, glutaraldehyde, pH, specific gravity,
creatinine, bleach, PCC and oxidants.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Exogenous Contaminants
Samples Adulteration
■ Principal concern with antemortem contamination arises from the intentional manipulation of
the sample to mask the presence of drugs.
■ This include substitution, dilution or adulteration of the biological specimen with a foreign
substance.
– In general, in vitro adulteration can interfere with presumptive immunoassay tests,
with the intention of producing false-negative results.
– In vitro adulteration agents: Ascorbic acid, Alcohol, Amber-13 (hydrochloric acid),
ammonia, etc.…)
– On site or dipstick tests are available for nitrite, glutaraldehyde, pH, specific gravity,
creatinine, bleach, PCC and oxidants.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Exogenous Contaminants
Samples Adulteration
– Specimen dilution or in vivo adulteration by ingestion of a substance to mask the presence of
drugs is also encountered.
– This is commonly achieved by the ingestion of large quantities of fluid prior to the test or by
administration of a diuretic.
– In vivo adulteration agent
– Diuretics
■ prescription: thiazides and thiazide-like drugs (e.g. hydrochlorothiazide,
metolazone), carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g. acetazolamide), Loop diuretics
(e.g. bumetanide, furosemide, torsemide), osmotic diuretics (e.g. mannitol)
■ Over the counter (OTC): aqua-ban, diurex, fem-1, midol, etc.…
– Other
■ Alcoholic beverages, xanthines (e.g. caffeine, theophylline, 8-bromotheophyillne),
herbals and aquaretic (e.g. golden seal root, jumpier)
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Exogenous Contaminants
Samples Adulteration
■ Other sources of contaminants or unexpected analytes
include pyrolytic breakdown products due to thermal
degradation of drugs.
■ Other source of contamination may arise from
pharmaceutical impurities or adulterants and cutting agents
that are incorporated into illicit drugs prior to sale
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology
India: Pharmaceutical Press.
Exogenous Contaminants
Medical Artifacts
■ Clinical therapy can sometimes produce medical artefacts that
complicate toxicological findings.
– Administration of fluids (e.g. saline) during clinical care, blood is only
contaminated (diluted) with the infusion solution if it is collected
downstream from the intravenous line.
– If downstream collection is suspected, careful review of the medical
records and/ or measurement of the hematocrit to determine
specimen dilution may be necessary.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India:
Pharmaceutical Press.
Endogenous Contaminants
■ By their very nature, all biological specimens are subject to endogenous
interferences, regardless of whether or not they are derived from living or
deceased person.
■ In general, however, antemortem specimens are somewhat less
susceptible to endogenous artifacts or contaminants
– Concentration of GHB may increase in urine during storage, upon
collection and storage of unpreserved blood, or in citrate-buffered
antemortem blood.
Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India:
Pharmaceutical Press.
Interpreting theTest Results
Result reporting standardization
While the thresholds for detection have been standardized
in work sitting, they have not been standardized for the
pain management setting
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the
CurrentOpioid Epidemic." AnesthAnalg 125(6): 2094-
2104.
Factors affecting threshold detectability
A drug’s pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and
pharmacogenetics and how the urine specimen is
collected, handled, and analyzed all can affect the
threshold of detection.
How long an individual continues to excrete a drug or its
metabolite at or above a test’s lowest threshold of
detectability determines a drug’s window of detection, and
this is influenced by the drug’s pharmacokinetics,
pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.
Interpreting theTest Results:
Consideration
Presence of positive results never correlate with medical
condition
There is no scientific correlation between drug concentrating versus drug
dose, frequency of drug use, and when the last dose was taken.
Importance of selection of threshold level by requesting
clinicians
The consequence of requesting the lowest threshold of detectability
means there is a greater likelihood of picking up an impurity due to another
opioid being manufactured using the same equipment.
Therefore, caution must be exercised when interpreting test results
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid
Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
Interpreting theTest Results:
Consideration
Factors affecting right interpretation of
results
A correct interpretation of the results requires
clinicians understand that results can be affected by
drug interference patterns, cross-reactivity, and drug
metabolism
Importance of clinician to lab
communication
Clinicians should always contact the laboratory when
uncertain about the meaning of the results
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the
Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-
2104.
Interpreting theTest Results:Types of
LaboratoryTest Results Reporting
Negative results
True-negative
False-negative
Pseudo-false-negative
Negative due to inherent limitations of a test
Positive results
True-positive
False-positive
Pseudo-false-positive
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid
Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
Interpreting theTest Results:Types of
LaboratoryTest Results Reporting
True negative
The absence of a drug is
considered a true-negative
result
False negative
When a drug whose
concentration is anticipated
to fall at or above the
threshold of detection is
undetected
Pseudo-false-
negative
Rapid metabolization of an
opioid, either due to
polypharmacy or a patient’s
genetic predisposition, can
prevent identification of the
opioid on testing. This
defines a pseudo-false-
negative because the test
correctly failed to confirm
the presence of the opioid
even though the patient is
taking it.
Pseudo-false-
negative or some true
negative result
This is usually due to
negative results in spite of
expected positive results.
Possible explanations
include laboratory error due
to mislabeling the specimen,
mishandling specimen, or
using faulty equipment, or
patient missing dose of
treatment.
Method inherent
limitation
The likelihoods of this
occurring may be greater
with an IAS compared to
UDT because of the IAS’s
relatively higher threshold of
detectability
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug
Testing in the Current Opioid
Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-
2104.
Interpreting theTest Results:Types of
LaboratoryTest Results Reporting
Positive results
Presence of a drug above the
threshold of detectability defines a
true-positives results
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the
Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
False positive
When a drug that is truly absent is
identified as present
Laboratory error, e.g. performing the test
incorrectly or analyzing the wrong
patient’s specimen, or drug interference /
cross-reactivity are possible explanations.
A pseudo-false-positive result
This means the test correctly identifies the presence of a
drug but it is not due to the patient taking that specific drug.
This can be occur in the following setting
•Cross over of metabolites: the metabolism of a parent
opioid to a secondary opioid
•Poppy seeds ingestion: foods that contain poppy seeds can
lead to an IAS result that is positive for opiates
•Marijuana and the synthetic cannabinoids (contain 11-not-
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabiol
•Impurity in the manufacturing process: can led to
identification of a small amount of codeine when morphine
is the prescribed opioid or a small amount of hydrocodone
when oxycodone is the prescribed opioid
Interpreting the
Test Results:
Important
Question to Ask
for Excluding
False Results
■ To minimize the challenges that can occur with
interpreting unexpected results , the clinical
should document the patient’s responses to the
following questions
– If you are prescribed an opioid, which one
are you taking, what dose are you taking,
how often are you taking it, and when did
you last take it
– If you are taking an d other prescribed,
nonprescribed, or over-the-counter drug or
any illicit substance, which one are you
taking, what dose are you taking, how often
are you taking it, and when did you last take
it.
Mahajan,G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting
in the CurrentOpioid Epidemic." AnesthAnalg
125(6): 2094-2104.
Reporting Screening Results
screening results are reported as “presumptive
positive” if the screening results is more than the
cutoff value
The presumptive result only indicate the presence of the drug or
metabolite in urine and do not indicate or measure intoxication or
efficacy of elimination.
Screening results are reported as “indicative of
negative” if the screening results are less than the
cutoff value.
Negative result reflect the concentration that fall below the cut off
and do not necessarily exclude the presence of the drug or
metabolite.
UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery; October 18, 2011
REPORTING
SCREENING
RESULTS
Therefore,
confirmation testing
must be requested to
be performed
Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid
Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
References…
■ Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth
Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
■ Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India, Pharmaceutical
Press.
■ Ertmer, B. (2019). "February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at
Chicago." from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and-
sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
■ UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery; October 18, 2011
■ (2019). "What is a Drug Screen?". 2019, from https://www.concentra.com/resource-
center/articles/what-is-a-drug-screen.
■ (2019). "Drug screening - Latest research and news | Nature." from
https://www.nature.com/subjects/drug-screening.

Urine Drug Screening

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Definition Drug testing isthe evaluation of a urine, blood or other type of biological sample to determine if the subject has been using the drug or drugs in question. There are many circumstances that may lead to drug testing. (2019). "Drug screening - Latest research and news | Nature." from https://www.nature.com/subjects/drug-screening. A drug screen (also called a drug test) is the collection and analysis of blood, urine, hair, or saliva to detect the presence of the chemicals and contaminants left behind in the body due to drug use. A drug screen may also be used to detect performance-enhancing drugs sometimes used by professional athletes such as steroids and HGH. Many different types of drug screens exist for multiple purposes. (2019). "What is a Drug Screen?". 2019, from https://www.concentra.com/resource-center/articles/what-is-a-drug- screen
  • 3.
    Reasons for Drug Screening ■Onsite drug screening is performed for a variety of medical, professional and legal reasons. A few scenarios in which screening may be done are: – Pre-employment – Suspicion of drug abuse – Military service, sports participation – Legal, criminal – Drug-therapy compliance monitoring – Drug abuse rehabilitating monitoring – Postmortem investigation Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and- sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
  • 4.
    SubstancesTested in aDrug Screening Most commonly substances Amphetamines Cannabinoid metabolites Cocaine metabolites opiate metabolites phencyclidine (PCP) Expanded immunoassays Tricyclic antidepressants Barbiturate Methadone Alcohol Benzodiazepines Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy- practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
  • 5.
    SPECIMEN COLLECTION AND HANDLING This Photo byUnknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
  • 6.
    Specimen Collection andHandling: Guidelines THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PATHOLOGISTS HAS PUBLISHED GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING MEDICOLEGAL SPECIMENS AND PRESERVING THE CHAIN OF EVIDENCE THE FACULTY OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE HAS PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATION FOR THE COLLECTION FOR FORENSIC SPECIMENS FROM COMPLAINANTS AND SUSPECTS THE EUROPEAN WORKPLACE DRUG TESTING SOCIETY HAS PUBLISHED GUIDELINES ON THE COLLECTION OF URINE, ORAL FLUID AND HAIR. COOPER, A. N. A. G. (2013). CLARKE'S ANALYTICAL FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY INDIA: PHARMACEUTICAL PRESS.
  • 7.
    Specimen Collection andHandling: SpecimensTypes Bodily specimen that can be tested include urine, blood, hair, sweat, or saliva Currently, urine remains the ideal specimen to test for clinical purposes because it has the most published scientific data. Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the CurrentOpioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094- 2104.
  • 8.
    Specimen Collection and Handling: BloodSpecimens ■ Advantages: – Widely accepted matrix: ■ Provides unique advantages over other matrices in terms of the wide variety of analytical methodologies available – Determines recent drug use (hours, days) ■ Determination of patent drug and metabolite concentrations (and their ratios) may also yield useful information pertaining to acute or chronic use – Related to pharmacological effect – Not readily adulterated – The interpretive value of the matrix from a pharmacological standpoint. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 9.
    Specimen Collection and Handling: BloodSpecimens ■ Disadvantages – Invasive collection – Collection requiring medical personnel – Shorter detection time – Marked difference between antemortem and postmortem analyte concentration. ■ Antemortem and postmortem blood samples are notably different, and the site of the postmortem blood draw (central or peripheral) can be of critical importance – Require specialized antiseptic collection: ■ Non-alcohol-containing antiseptic wipes such as betadine (povidone-iodine) are preferred to avoid any contamination that could interfere with alcohol analysis. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 10.
    SpecimenCollection and Handling: Urine Specimens ■Advantage – Widely accepted matrix: – Valuable specimen for both antemortem and postmortem drug testing because it is relatively uncomplicated matrix – Easy collection – Plentiful supply – Amenable to automated analysis – Longer detection window than blood (days to weeks) – Extensive reference data ■ has the vast amount of published reference data for both antemortem and postmortem drug concentrations Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 11.
    SpecimenCollection and Handling: Urine Specimens ■Disadvantage – Potential for donor manipulation – Minimal parent drug – Not useful for quantitative analysis – Not related to impairment or pharmacological effect ■ The multiplicity of factors influencing urine drug concentrations (urine volume, clearance, metabolism, pH, and time of last void) generally means that, in isolation, these results have limited quantitative value. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 12.
    SpecimenCollection and Handling: Urine Specimens ■Collection – mid-stream urine sample is usually collected into a plastic container containing sodium fluoride as preservative It is necessary to take precautions against specimen adulteration Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 13.
    SpecimenCollection and Handling: Urine Specimens ■Consideration – Urine concentration are dependent upon physiology and do not correlate with dose or serum concentrations.These result should not be used for therapeutic drug monitoring UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery; October 18, 2011
  • 14.
    Specimen Collection and Handling: Time ■Timing is an important factor in specimen collection: – Particularly in antemortem cases where some drugs have short detection times and therefore limited detection windows Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 15.
    Specimen Collection andHandling: Containers Handling, Labeling andTransfer All samples should be properly marked for: Identification with the caser number, donor name, date and time o collection, signature or initials of the collector and specimen discerption. All samples containers should have: Taper-proof containers and / or tape bearing the collector’s initials and date of collection should be used. All samples transfer to laboratory should be: Forwarded to the laboratory in appropriate leak-proof and tamper-proof packaging/ shipping materials with all appropriate documentation “chain-of-custody” All samples received by laboratory should be: Inspected and appropriated documented in terms of condition and quantity during the accessioning process. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 16.
    Specimen Collection and Handling: Containers ■Container specifications – The specimen container should be appropriate for the intended use and does not compromise the analytical finding – Container size should be appropriate for the volume or weight of the specimen so that the headspace is minimized. ■ Container headspace undesired effects: Excessive headspace in the container can increase the chance of oxidative loss, volatilization of analytes (e.g. ethanol, and other low-boiling point compounds.) – Some analytes have a tendency to adhere to plastic or glass surfaces depending on their physiochemical properties. – Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 17.
    Specimen Collection and Handling: Containers Itis a good laboratory practice to evaluate all new specimen container prior to routine use in the laboratory. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 18.
    Sample Handling, Preservation andStorage ■ Specimens should be stored at appropriate temperature with adequate preservative and in an environment accessible only to authorized personnel to ensure security and integrity. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 19.
    Sample Preservation andStorage: Storage Short-term storage: recommendation for most samples is to be stored at refrigerated temperature (4C) Long-term storage: recommended for storage of tow weeks or more periods and is carried at (-20C or lower) Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 20.
    Sample Preservation andStorage: Preservation Sodium fluoride (2% w/v) - Blood Samples is a routine in most laboratories. Commercial evacuated blood collection tubes (e.g. grey-top tubes) contain sodium fluoride as the preservative and potassium oxalate as the anticoagulant Inhibition of microorganisms and enzymes with sodium fluoride is important for commonly encountered analytes such as ethanol, cocaine and others. Fluoride acts as an enzyme inhibitor and helps prevent glycolysis. Potassium oxalate - Blood Samples Considered as the preferred anticoagulant over other alternatives such as EDTA, heparin or citrate Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 21.
    Sample Preservation andStorage: Preservation Antioxidants Such as ascorbic acid (0.25%) or sodium metabisulfite (1% w/v) are sometimes used to prevent oxidative loss Theses agents have the potential to act as reducing agents towards some drugs, in particular N-oxide metabolites, which may be transformed into the parent drug pH adjustment: Adjustment of specimen pH is not generally favored routinely as some drugs alkali labile, while others are acid labile Antimicrobial, SodiumAzide (0.1% v/w) Used sometime as a preservative and antimicrobial agent in urine samples Should not be used if samples are to be analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay because it can interfere with horseradish peroxidase-mediated colorimetric detection Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 22.
    Specimen Stability: Intro • thephysiochemical properties of the drug, characteristics of the specimen or matrix, tendency to conjugate/ deconjugate, specimen collection procedure, container selection, and the use of preservatives or other additives Drug stability can be influenced by many factors including • Specimen pH and the presence of other substances in addition to external factors • Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press. Drug instability is often matrix dependent and influenced by factors such as
  • 23.
    Specimen Stability: Analyte Alternation Ingeneral drug instability in any toxicological specimen is due to metabolic degradation, chemical transformation, or a combination of both. After a specimen has been collected, enzymes may remain active and continue to degrade or transform the drug in vitro. In general, drug instability arises as a result of moieties or functional groups that are susceptible to Transformation, such as ester (e.g. 6- acetylmorphine, cocaine, acetylsalicylic acid), sulfur-containing drugs, photolabile drugs (e.g. phenothiazines, midazolam, lysergic acid diethylamide) or those with functional groups that are readily oxidized or reduced. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 24.
    Specimen Stability: Analyte Alternation Dependingon the collection, storage, use of preservative, container type, storage conditions, use of preservative, container type, matrix and other factors, the concentration of a drug at the time of assay may not be identical to the concentration at the time of collection, all toxicological results should be interpreted within this context Some drugs also exhibit a degree of thermal instability, this is a consideration for drugs that are subjected to elevated temperatures during administration (e.g. by smoking), and during analysis (e.g. GC-MS) Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 25.
    WhatTest to Perform To getthe most comprehensive results, clinicians should order both a an immunoassay screening (IAS) followed by a confirmatory mass-spectrometry urine drug test (UDT). Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 26.
    WhatTest to Perform Confirmatory urinedrug test, Gas or Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, has a lower threshold of detectability and provides both qualitative and quantitative information. Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 27.
    WhatTest to Perform Clinicians shouldunderstand that immunoassay screens have high false- positive and false-negative rates. Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 28.
    Confirmatory Urine DrugTest ConfirmatoryUDT involves laboratory-based testing utilize the techniques of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Chromatography separates the analytes in a specimen, mass spectrometry unequivocally identifies the relevant analytes by their mass to charge ratio. Both GC-MS and LC-MS provide quantitative information about individually identified opiates, opioids, and their respective metabolites Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 29.
    Confirmatory Urine DrugTest Confirmatorytest advantage The ability of GC-MS and LC-MS to provide both a qualitative and quantitative answer about the parent drug and metabolite means equivocal IAS results can be potentially resolved, thereby decreasing the likelihood for false-positive results Confirmatory test disadvantage Its limitations of being available only as a laboratory-based test that has a turn around time of hours to days. Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 30.
    Immunoassay Screens IAS ISONLY A QUALITATIVE TEST THAT LOOKS FOR WHICH DRUG/ DRUG CLASSES ARE PRESENT VERSUS ABSENT. at minimum the majority of IASs look for amphetamine, cocaine, marijuana, PCP , and opiates (limited to codeine, morphine, and 6- monoacetyl-morphine to test for heroin use) IN THE PAIN MANAGEMENT THE TESTING PANEL SHOULD BE CUSTOMIZED TO ALSO INCLUDE BENZODIAZEPINES, BARBITURATES, METHAMPHETAMINE, SEMISYNTHETIC OPIOIDS, METHADONE, AND BUPRENORPHINE. MAHAJAN, G. (2017). "ROLE OF URINE DRUG TESTING IN THE CURRENT OPIOID EPIDEMIC." ANESTH ANALG 125(6): 2094- 2104.
  • 31.
    Immunoassay Screens The immunoassayis the most commonly used Urine Drug Screening because it is inexpensive and rapid. Five different immunoassays are available Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) Enzyme-multiplied immunoassay (EMIT) Fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FIPA) Kinetic interaction of microparticle in solution (KIMS) Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information- group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
  • 32.
    Immunoassay Screens ■ IASs sufferfrom added limitations that include – Cross-reactivity with other drugs and substances that can lead to higher false-positive results – The inability to distinguish a positive opiate result as being due to codeine versus morphine versus heroin versus and other combination of the aforementioned – The inconsistency or inability to detect semisynthetic opioids (hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, oxymorphone,, buprenorphine) and synthetic opioids (fentanyl, meperidine, methadone, and pentazocine) – Higher thresholds of detection that can potentially cause one to falsely conclude that a substance is absent when it is truly present – While an IAS reliably detects opiate, it inconsistently identifies the presence of semisynthetic opioids and synthetic opioid – IAS generally does not detect opioid metabolites from the cytochrome P450 enzyme system – The inability to accurately conclude whether the identification of both the parent drug and its active metabolite means the patient is compliant versus the identification of the “active metabolite” really represents surreptitious of a nonprescribed opioid and the patient is noncompliant. – Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 33.
    Immunoassay Screens ■ IASs sufferfrom added limitations that include – They are considered as screening assay and yield qualitative, class specific information. – Specific drugs within a class are not identified using these methods. – These assays vary in their ability to detect parent compounds and metabolites. – These assays carries the possibilities of slight variations due to change in reagents lots – UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery;October 18, 2011
  • 34.
    Immunoassay Screens There area number of advantages for always including IASs: Low cost Identification of illicit substances Potential acquisition of results in minutes to hours to enable one to make more immediate intervention Ultimately, clinicians must understand that all AISs are only helpful for making preliminary treatment decisions Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 35.
    Immunoassay Screens Criteria forLegitimate Urine Samples Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs Urine should be collected in a tamper-evident container under supervision if necessary.Criteria for legitimate urine samples include A volume of 30mL or more Temperature between 32C and 38C pH of 4.5 to 8.5 Nitrates < 500 mcg/mL Specific gravity >1.002 and <1.020 Creatinine > mg/dL
  • 36.
    Immunoassay Screens False-Negative Results Ertmer,B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy- practice/centers-and-sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs False negatives are uncommon but can occur as a result of low concentrations in the urine, tampering, and other situation Dilute urine (excess fluid intake, diuretic use, pediatric sample) Infrequent drug use Prolonged time since last use Recent ingestion Insufficient quantity ingested Metabolic factors Inappropriate test used Elevated urine lactate Tampering (discussed later)
  • 37.
    Immunoassay Screens False-Positive Result Thereare examples of interfering substances producing false positive results include Opiates may be falsely detected due to poppy seed ingestion (low concentration detected) Heroin and hydrocodone are metabolized into morphine and hydromorphone respectively, and GC-MS may identify the metabolites rather than the parent compound. Immunoassay results for cannabinoid and cocaine metabolites are associated with very few false-positives while immunoassay results for amphetamines and opiates are associated with a higher number of false- positive Ertmer, B. (2019). February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and- sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs
  • 38.
  • 39.
    Legitimate Sample ■ Thenormal temperature rage is 32C -38C. ■ A specimen may be considered invalid if the pH is between 3 and 4.5 or between 9 and 11. – The specimen may be adulterated if the pH is less than 3 or greater than 11 ■ A specimen is considered diluted if the creatinine concentration is less than 200mg/L and the specific gravity is less than 1.003 Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 40.
    Exogenous Contaminants Phthalate Interferences ■SPECIMENS COLLECTED INTO PLASTIC CONTAINERS ARE SOMETIMES SUSCEPTIBLE TO PHTHALATE INTERFERENCES ■ NUMEROUS PLASTICIZER INTERFERENCES SUCH AS DIBUTYL PHTHALATE MAY CO- EXTRACT AND INTERFERE WITH ANALYTICAL DETECTION BY GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHIC OR MASS-SPECTROMETRIC TECHNIQUES, YIELDING CHARACTERISTIC PHTHALATE IONS. ■ ALL PLASTIC CONTAINERS SHOULD BE EVALUATED PRIOR TO WIDESPREAD IMPLEMENTATION ■ ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO THESE SUBSTANCES FROM HOUSEHOLD ITEMS, FOOD, BEVERAGE AND OTHER SOURCES CAN PRODUCE DETECTABLE QUANTITIES OF PHTHALATE ESTERS OR THEIR METABOLITE IN BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS INCLUDING BLOOD, SERUM, URINE AND BREAST MILK COOPER, A. N. A. G. (2013). CLARKE'S ANALYTICAL FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY INDIA: PHARMACEUTICAL PRESS.
  • 41.
    Exogenous Contaminants Samples Adulteration ■How to Subvert the Tests – Clinician should always be aware that adulteration might be a possibility – Scientists at quest diagnostics discovered that patient had adulterated about 1.5% of analyzed samples through ■ Diluting them 60% ■ Adding an oxidant 21% ■ Substituting an alternate specimen 12% ■ Adding some other adulterant 7% – Various strategies can e implemented either before or at the time the patient submits a specimen. – To obtain the most concentrated specimen, have the patient submit a morning specimen – To ensure the specimen has not been adulterated, clinician should ask the laboratory to perform validity testing. Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094- 2104.
  • 42.
    Exogenous Contaminants Samples Adulteration ■Principal concern with antemortem contamination arises from the intentional manipulation of the sample to mask the presence of drugs. ■ This include substitution, dilution or adulteration of the biological specimen with a foreign substance. – In general, in vitro adulteration can interfere with presumptive immunoassay tests, with the intention of producing false-negative results. – In vitro adulteration agents: Ascorbic acid, Alcohol, Amber-13 (hydrochloric acid), ammonia, etc.…) – On site or dipstick tests are available for nitrite, glutaraldehyde, pH, specific gravity, creatinine, bleach, PCC and oxidants. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 43.
    Exogenous Contaminants Samples Adulteration ■Principal concern with antemortem contamination arises from the intentional manipulation of the sample to mask the presence of drugs. ■ This include substitution, dilution or adulteration of the biological specimen with a foreign substance. – In general, in vitro adulteration can interfere with presumptive immunoassay tests, with the intention of producing false-negative results. – In vitro adulteration agents: Ascorbic acid, Alcohol, Amber-13 (hydrochloric acid), ammonia, etc.…) – On site or dipstick tests are available for nitrite, glutaraldehyde, pH, specific gravity, creatinine, bleach, PCC and oxidants. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 44.
    Exogenous Contaminants Samples Adulteration –Specimen dilution or in vivo adulteration by ingestion of a substance to mask the presence of drugs is also encountered. – This is commonly achieved by the ingestion of large quantities of fluid prior to the test or by administration of a diuretic. – In vivo adulteration agent – Diuretics ■ prescription: thiazides and thiazide-like drugs (e.g. hydrochlorothiazide, metolazone), carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g. acetazolamide), Loop diuretics (e.g. bumetanide, furosemide, torsemide), osmotic diuretics (e.g. mannitol) ■ Over the counter (OTC): aqua-ban, diurex, fem-1, midol, etc.… – Other ■ Alcoholic beverages, xanthines (e.g. caffeine, theophylline, 8-bromotheophyillne), herbals and aquaretic (e.g. golden seal root, jumpier) Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical Forensic Toxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 45.
    Exogenous Contaminants Samples Adulteration ■Other sources of contaminants or unexpected analytes include pyrolytic breakdown products due to thermal degradation of drugs. ■ Other source of contamination may arise from pharmaceutical impurities or adulterants and cutting agents that are incorporated into illicit drugs prior to sale Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 46.
    Exogenous Contaminants Medical Artifacts ■Clinical therapy can sometimes produce medical artefacts that complicate toxicological findings. – Administration of fluids (e.g. saline) during clinical care, blood is only contaminated (diluted) with the infusion solution if it is collected downstream from the intravenous line. – If downstream collection is suspected, careful review of the medical records and/ or measurement of the hematocrit to determine specimen dilution may be necessary. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 47.
    Endogenous Contaminants ■ Bytheir very nature, all biological specimens are subject to endogenous interferences, regardless of whether or not they are derived from living or deceased person. ■ In general, however, antemortem specimens are somewhat less susceptible to endogenous artifacts or contaminants – Concentration of GHB may increase in urine during storage, upon collection and storage of unpreserved blood, or in citrate-buffered antemortem blood. Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • 48.
    Interpreting theTest Results Resultreporting standardization While the thresholds for detection have been standardized in work sitting, they have not been standardized for the pain management setting Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the CurrentOpioid Epidemic." AnesthAnalg 125(6): 2094- 2104. Factors affecting threshold detectability A drug’s pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics and how the urine specimen is collected, handled, and analyzed all can affect the threshold of detection. How long an individual continues to excrete a drug or its metabolite at or above a test’s lowest threshold of detectability determines a drug’s window of detection, and this is influenced by the drug’s pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.
  • 49.
    Interpreting theTest Results: Consideration Presenceof positive results never correlate with medical condition There is no scientific correlation between drug concentrating versus drug dose, frequency of drug use, and when the last dose was taken. Importance of selection of threshold level by requesting clinicians The consequence of requesting the lowest threshold of detectability means there is a greater likelihood of picking up an impurity due to another opioid being manufactured using the same equipment. Therefore, caution must be exercised when interpreting test results Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 50.
    Interpreting theTest Results: Consideration Factorsaffecting right interpretation of results A correct interpretation of the results requires clinicians understand that results can be affected by drug interference patterns, cross-reactivity, and drug metabolism Importance of clinician to lab communication Clinicians should always contact the laboratory when uncertain about the meaning of the results Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094- 2104.
  • 51.
    Interpreting theTest Results:Typesof LaboratoryTest Results Reporting Negative results True-negative False-negative Pseudo-false-negative Negative due to inherent limitations of a test Positive results True-positive False-positive Pseudo-false-positive Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 52.
    Interpreting theTest Results:Typesof LaboratoryTest Results Reporting True negative The absence of a drug is considered a true-negative result False negative When a drug whose concentration is anticipated to fall at or above the threshold of detection is undetected Pseudo-false- negative Rapid metabolization of an opioid, either due to polypharmacy or a patient’s genetic predisposition, can prevent identification of the opioid on testing. This defines a pseudo-false- negative because the test correctly failed to confirm the presence of the opioid even though the patient is taking it. Pseudo-false- negative or some true negative result This is usually due to negative results in spite of expected positive results. Possible explanations include laboratory error due to mislabeling the specimen, mishandling specimen, or using faulty equipment, or patient missing dose of treatment. Method inherent limitation The likelihoods of this occurring may be greater with an IAS compared to UDT because of the IAS’s relatively higher threshold of detectability Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094- 2104.
  • 53.
    Interpreting theTest Results:Typesof LaboratoryTest Results Reporting Positive results Presence of a drug above the threshold of detectability defines a true-positives results Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104. False positive When a drug that is truly absent is identified as present Laboratory error, e.g. performing the test incorrectly or analyzing the wrong patient’s specimen, or drug interference / cross-reactivity are possible explanations. A pseudo-false-positive result This means the test correctly identifies the presence of a drug but it is not due to the patient taking that specific drug. This can be occur in the following setting •Cross over of metabolites: the metabolism of a parent opioid to a secondary opioid •Poppy seeds ingestion: foods that contain poppy seeds can lead to an IAS result that is positive for opiates •Marijuana and the synthetic cannabinoids (contain 11-not- delta-9-tetrahydrocannabiol •Impurity in the manufacturing process: can led to identification of a small amount of codeine when morphine is the prescribed opioid or a small amount of hydrocodone when oxycodone is the prescribed opioid
  • 54.
    Interpreting the Test Results: Important Questionto Ask for Excluding False Results ■ To minimize the challenges that can occur with interpreting unexpected results , the clinical should document the patient’s responses to the following questions – If you are prescribed an opioid, which one are you taking, what dose are you taking, how often are you taking it, and when did you last take it – If you are taking an d other prescribed, nonprescribed, or over-the-counter drug or any illicit substance, which one are you taking, what dose are you taking, how often are you taking it, and when did you last take it. Mahajan,G. (2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the CurrentOpioid Epidemic." AnesthAnalg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 55.
    Reporting Screening Results screeningresults are reported as “presumptive positive” if the screening results is more than the cutoff value The presumptive result only indicate the presence of the drug or metabolite in urine and do not indicate or measure intoxication or efficacy of elimination. Screening results are reported as “indicative of negative” if the screening results are less than the cutoff value. Negative result reflect the concentration that fall below the cut off and do not necessarily exclude the presence of the drug or metabolite. UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery; October 18, 2011
  • 56.
    REPORTING SCREENING RESULTS Therefore, confirmation testing must berequested to be performed Mahajan, G. (2017). "Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104.
  • 57.
    References… ■ Mahajan, G.(2017). "Role of Urine DrugTesting in the Current Opioid Epidemic." Anesth Analg 125(6): 2094-2104. ■ Cooper, A. N. a. G. (2013). Clarke's Analytical ForensicToxicology India, Pharmaceutical Press. ■ Ertmer, B. (2019). "February 2011 FAQs | College of Pharmacy | University of Illinois at Chicago." from https://pharmacy.uic.edu/departments/pharmacy-practice/centers-and- sections/drug-information-group/2014/2011/february-2011-faqs ■ UrineToxicology Screening on labor and delivery; October 18, 2011 ■ (2019). "What is a Drug Screen?". 2019, from https://www.concentra.com/resource- center/articles/what-is-a-drug-screen. ■ (2019). "Drug screening - Latest research and news | Nature." from https://www.nature.com/subjects/drug-screening.