TUBE FRAME
STRUCTURES
SUBMITTED BY
ZAFRIN MOHAMED
ROLL.NO:77
S7 CE B
GUIDED BY
Mrs. VARNA K THANKAPPAN
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
IIET,NELLIKUZI
CONTENTS
• Introduction
• Need for high rise buildings
• Different configurations
• Advantages
• Disadvantages
• Brief explanation of shear lag
• Conclusion
• References
1/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
INTRODUCTION
• Introduced by Fazalur Khan,Dhaka
Bangladesh
• Hollow cantilever perpendicular to
the ground
• Buildings in excess of 40 stories
• A 43-story Khan-designed De-Witt
Chestnut Apartment in Chicago
• Steel, concrete, or composite
construction
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 2/26
3/26CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
De-Witt Chestnut Apartment,
Chicago
Need for tall structure
• Increase in building height
• Slenderness
• Building weight reduction
• Limited availability of land
• Rapid increase in cost of land
4/26CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CONCEPT OF TUBULAR
SYSTEM
• Design of strength, rigid and stable
structures
• Largely economic solution
• Building designed for resisting lateral loads
• Hollow cantilever perpendicular to ground
• Incarnation of the tubes
• Exterior-Columns and beams forms a rigid
frame
• Interior-simply framed for gravity loads
• 50% of windows on exterior wall surface 5/26
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Defining tube frame
• Predict the structural behavior
• Replace 3D system by equivalent
plane frame
• Analysed by conventional methods
• Comparison of results- 15 story
Perspex model of the building
• Deciding the type of configuration
6/26CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 7/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Configuration of Tubes
• Framed or box tube
• Braced tube
• Tube in tube
• Bundled tube
The Framed Tube
• The frames consist of closely spaced
columns,
2 - 4 m between centers, joined by deep
girder .
• Act as perforated chimney or stack
• Lateral resistance is by the stiff moment
resisting frames
• Gravity load shared by interior and
exterior columns
• Appropriate for buildings having 40-100
storeys
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
8/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Tube frame structures
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 9/26
Cont..
• Grid like facade structures and is repetious
• Use of prefabrication possible
• Larger distance of exterior column from
NA resists bending moment
• Economically attractive and possess
torsional rigidity
• Greater flexibility in space planning
• A well known example-World Trade Centre
CASE STUDY OF WORLD TRADE CENTRE
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
10/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
• Architect:-Minoru
Yamasaki
• 110 story tower
• 415m in height
• 50,000 employees
and 80,000 visitors
daily
• Twin tower in
diagonal
juxtaposition
Cont…
• vertical extrusions of square plans
• The framed tube consist of 56 box steel
columns joint by moment resisting
connections
• The overall dimensions of framed tube
column are constant
• Wall thickness increases from top to
bottom to increse response to loads
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 11/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 12/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Braced Tube Structures
• Further improvement of framed tube
• Cross bracing frame with x braces over
many stories-(fig)
• First used in John Hancock building,
Chicago-(fig)
• Diagonals of a braced tube connect
columns at each intersections
• Shear lag is virtually eliminated
• Spacing for columns are increased
• Depth of girders are small
13/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
John Hancock Building, Chicago
Cont…
• Large sized windows are allowed
• Braces transfer axial load from highly
stressed column to low stressed
column
• Hence eliminates difference between
load stress
• Large scope of architecture .uses a
structural-architectural concept
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
14/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Tube-in Tube Structures
• Consist of outer framed tube together with
an internal elevator and a service core
• Inner tube would be braced frames
• Outer tube has greater structural depth, so
plays dominant role
• Outer tube-hull (fig)
• Inner tube –core
• Inner tube holds elevator and other
services
• Another tube around the exterior
15/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Cont…
• 780 third avanue,Metro Manhattan
office space is the first work
• Concrete shear wall for bracing in the
hull(fig)
• Off centre core allowing column free
interiors
• Accuracy,reliability and simplicity are
verified
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 16/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 17/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
core
hull
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 18/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Metro Manhattan Office
Space
Bundled Tube
• Consists of multiple tubes instead of
1.
• Several tubes tied up to resist lateral
forces
• Interior columns on the parameters
of the tube (fig)
• Willis Tower, Burj Khalifa are best
examples
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
19/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Cont..
• Highly efficient in
economic terms
• Bundled together
in different sorts of
grouping
• Not necesserily
box shaped
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
20/26
Willis Tower
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
21/26
Burj Khalifa
Advantages of TFS
• Allows greater flexibility in planning of
interior space
• Regularity in the column schedule allows
off-site fabrication and welding
• maximum advantage is taken of the total
width of the building to resist overturning
moment
• Identical framing for all floors
• When well designed, tubular forms uses
same amount of material as in a half large
structure
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
22/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Criticism of TFS
• Reduces the size of the opening in
the building .
• At greater heights,view of outer
world is obstructed
• Shear lag
• Linear distribution of axial forces
across flange and web varies
• closely spaced columns are not
encouraged and undesirable
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
23/26
Shear lag
• Occurrence of non uniform
axial stress distribution
Features:-
• Positive shear lag
• Negative shear lag
• Negative shear lag-buckling
on the compression side
&cracking on tension side.
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
24/26
Conclusion
• The provision of adequate, stiffness,
particularly lateral stiffness is a major
consideration In the design of a tall
building hence TFS are engineers favorite
• But structural cost of the TFS may be high
with respect to conventional shear wall
structure
• so necessary to do research for cost
comparison between TFS and conventional
shear wall
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
25/26
References
1. Er. Nahant Rana,et.al.” Structural Forms Systems for Tall Building
Structures,SSRJ”, International Journal Of Civil Engineering (SSRG IJCE),
September 2014volume issued4
2. Hardin J. Patel,et,al. “Braced Tube Structural System: A review”
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, December-2015, ,
Volume 6, Issue 12.
3. R. Mahjoub,et,al, “Simple Analysis of Tube Frame System of Tall Building by
Using Deformation Functions”. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
Sciences, February 2011. [324-332]
4. Reza Mahjoub,et.al“Analysis of Tube Frame System of Tall Building by
Using of Deformation Functions”. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
Sciences, 5(8): 1475-1482, 2011.
5. Sharadrao Patil,et.al, “Shear Lag in Tube Structures”. IJISET - International
Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, March (2015), Vol.
2 Issue 3,
CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 26/26
TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
Tube Frame Structures:An overview

Tube Frame Structures:An overview

  • 2.
    TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES SUBMITTED BY ZAFRINMOHAMED ROLL.NO:77 S7 CE B GUIDED BY Mrs. VARNA K THANKAPPAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IIET,NELLIKUZI
  • 3.
    CONTENTS • Introduction • Needfor high rise buildings • Different configurations • Advantages • Disadvantages • Brief explanation of shear lag • Conclusion • References 1/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI
  • 4.
    INTRODUCTION • Introduced byFazalur Khan,Dhaka Bangladesh • Hollow cantilever perpendicular to the ground • Buildings in excess of 40 stories • A 43-story Khan-designed De-Witt Chestnut Apartment in Chicago • Steel, concrete, or composite construction TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 2/26
  • 5.
    3/26CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBEFRAME STRUCTURES De-Witt Chestnut Apartment, Chicago
  • 6.
    Need for tallstructure • Increase in building height • Slenderness • Building weight reduction • Limited availability of land • Rapid increase in cost of land 4/26CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 7.
    CONCEPT OF TUBULAR SYSTEM •Design of strength, rigid and stable structures • Largely economic solution • Building designed for resisting lateral loads • Hollow cantilever perpendicular to ground • Incarnation of the tubes • Exterior-Columns and beams forms a rigid frame • Interior-simply framed for gravity loads • 50% of windows on exterior wall surface 5/26 CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 8.
    Defining tube frame •Predict the structural behavior • Replace 3D system by equivalent plane frame • Analysed by conventional methods • Comparison of results- 15 story Perspex model of the building • Deciding the type of configuration 6/26CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 9.
    CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI7/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES Configuration of Tubes • Framed or box tube • Braced tube • Tube in tube • Bundled tube
  • 10.
    The Framed Tube •The frames consist of closely spaced columns, 2 - 4 m between centers, joined by deep girder . • Act as perforated chimney or stack • Lateral resistance is by the stiff moment resisting frames • Gravity load shared by interior and exterior columns • Appropriate for buildings having 40-100 storeys CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 8/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 11.
    Tube frame structures CIVILDEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 9/26 Cont.. • Grid like facade structures and is repetious • Use of prefabrication possible • Larger distance of exterior column from NA resists bending moment • Economically attractive and possess torsional rigidity • Greater flexibility in space planning • A well known example-World Trade Centre
  • 12.
    CASE STUDY OFWORLD TRADE CENTRE CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 10/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES • Architect:-Minoru Yamasaki • 110 story tower • 415m in height • 50,000 employees and 80,000 visitors daily • Twin tower in diagonal juxtaposition
  • 13.
    Cont… • vertical extrusionsof square plans • The framed tube consist of 56 box steel columns joint by moment resisting connections • The overall dimensions of framed tube column are constant • Wall thickness increases from top to bottom to increse response to loads CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 11/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 14.
    CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI12/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES Braced Tube Structures • Further improvement of framed tube • Cross bracing frame with x braces over many stories-(fig) • First used in John Hancock building, Chicago-(fig) • Diagonals of a braced tube connect columns at each intersections • Shear lag is virtually eliminated • Spacing for columns are increased • Depth of girders are small
  • 15.
    13/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES CIVILDEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI John Hancock Building, Chicago
  • 16.
    Cont… • Large sizedwindows are allowed • Braces transfer axial load from highly stressed column to low stressed column • Hence eliminates difference between load stress • Large scope of architecture .uses a structural-architectural concept CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 14/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 17.
    Tube-in Tube Structures •Consist of outer framed tube together with an internal elevator and a service core • Inner tube would be braced frames • Outer tube has greater structural depth, so plays dominant role • Outer tube-hull (fig) • Inner tube –core • Inner tube holds elevator and other services • Another tube around the exterior 15/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 18.
    Cont… • 780 thirdavanue,Metro Manhattan office space is the first work • Concrete shear wall for bracing in the hull(fig) • Off centre core allowing column free interiors • Accuracy,reliability and simplicity are verified CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 16/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 19.
    CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI17/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES core hull
  • 20.
    CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI18/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES Metro Manhattan Office Space
  • 21.
    Bundled Tube • Consistsof multiple tubes instead of 1. • Several tubes tied up to resist lateral forces • Interior columns on the parameters of the tube (fig) • Willis Tower, Burj Khalifa are best examples CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 19/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 22.
    Cont.. • Highly efficientin economic terms • Bundled together in different sorts of grouping • Not necesserily box shaped CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES 20/26
  • 23.
    Willis Tower CIVIL DEPT.IIETNELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES 21/26 Burj Khalifa
  • 24.
    Advantages of TFS •Allows greater flexibility in planning of interior space • Regularity in the column schedule allows off-site fabrication and welding • maximum advantage is taken of the total width of the building to resist overturning moment • Identical framing for all floors • When well designed, tubular forms uses same amount of material as in a half large structure CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 22/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES
  • 25.
    Criticism of TFS •Reduces the size of the opening in the building . • At greater heights,view of outer world is obstructed • Shear lag • Linear distribution of axial forces across flange and web varies • closely spaced columns are not encouraged and undesirable CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES 23/26
  • 26.
    Shear lag • Occurrenceof non uniform axial stress distribution Features:- • Positive shear lag • Negative shear lag • Negative shear lag-buckling on the compression side &cracking on tension side. CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES 24/26
  • 27.
    Conclusion • The provisionof adequate, stiffness, particularly lateral stiffness is a major consideration In the design of a tall building hence TFS are engineers favorite • But structural cost of the TFS may be high with respect to conventional shear wall structure • so necessary to do research for cost comparison between TFS and conventional shear wall CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES 25/26
  • 28.
    References 1. Er. NahantRana,et.al.” Structural Forms Systems for Tall Building Structures,SSRJ”, International Journal Of Civil Engineering (SSRG IJCE), September 2014volume issued4 2. Hardin J. Patel,et,al. “Braced Tube Structural System: A review” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, December-2015, , Volume 6, Issue 12. 3. R. Mahjoub,et,al, “Simple Analysis of Tube Frame System of Tall Building by Using Deformation Functions”. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, February 2011. [324-332] 4. Reza Mahjoub,et.al“Analysis of Tube Frame System of Tall Building by Using of Deformation Functions”. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(8): 1475-1482, 2011. 5. Sharadrao Patil,et.al, “Shear Lag in Tube Structures”. IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, March (2015), Vol. 2 Issue 3, CIVIL DEPT.IIET NELLIKUZHI 26/26 TUBE FRAME STRUCTURES