THE STUDENT ACTIVITY
METER FOR AWARENESS AND
     SELF-REFLECTION
Sten Govaerts, Katrien Verbert, Erik Duval, Abelardo Pardo.
              SigCHI 2012, Long Case Study.




                                                              1
our team:
Human-Computer Interaction

• technology enhanced learning
• music
• research 2.0
    2
PROBLEM




http://www.ypfp.org/classroom




                                     3
PROBLEM




http://www.ypfp.org/classroom




                                     3
OBJECTIVES

• self-monitoring   for learners




                                   http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm




                                                                                                4
OBJECTIVES

• self-monitoring   for learners

• awareness   for teachers




                                   http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm




                                                                                                4
OBJECTIVES

• self-monitoring   for learners

• awareness    for teachers

• time   tracking


                                   http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm




                                                                                                4
OBJECTIVES

• self-monitoring   for learners

• awareness    for teachers

• time   tracking

• learning
       resource use and
 recommendations
                                   http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm




                                                                                                4
OBJECTIVES

• self-monitoring     for learners

• awareness     for teachers

• time   tracking

• learning
       resource use and
 recommendations
                                                  http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm



• part   of Learning Analytics research [ACM LAK conf., Siemens 2011, Duval 2011]
                                                                                                               4
STUDENT ACTIVITY METER
     (SAM): DEMO.




        http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2000-02-24/




                                                      5
http://research.uow.edu.au/learningnetworks/seeing/snapp/index.html
SNAPP
GISMO   http://www.noe-kaleidoscope.org/pub/researcher/resources/video/aied/mazza.html
The Participation Tool   http://www.cs.uu.nl/docs/vakken/uem/Janssen.pdf
METHODOLOGY.
• design-basedresearch [Obrenović 2011]: design a tool, give
 students & teachers and evaluate

• iterative   process of design & evaluation

• paper   mockups

• usability   studies

• surveys     on usefulness

                                       http://funnytogo.com/pictures/evolution/timeline.htm
                                                                                              9
iter.     evaluation goal        methodology         demo-graphics        data

        usability, satisfaction, task-based interview
                                                       12 CS students timetracking
  I.        preliminary          with think-aloud, SUS
                                                        at KULeuven     via Twitter
             usefulness                & MSDT

         assessing teacher     online survey with    19 teachers &
 II.       needs, use &       Likert items, yes/no     TA’s with   Moodle logs
            usefulness        and open questions     CGIAR courses

         assessing teacher
                               online survey with    12 participants
           needs, expert
 III.                         Likert items, yes/no     from LAK      Moodle logs
          feedback, use &
                              and open questions        MOOC
             usefulness

                             structured face-to-face 11 teachers &     VM with
         use, usefulness &
IV.                          interview with tasks & TA’s at Carlos III extensive
            satisfaction
                                 open questions       Uni. Madrid tool tracking

                                                                                      10
11
11
demogra    evaluation         design
                                                  negative             positive
       phics       goal           changes
                                                                  •↑learnability
                  usability,
                                                                  •↓errors
      12 CS     satisfaction,                   small usability
I.                              1st iteration                     •good satisfaction
     students   preliminary                        issues
                                                                  •usefulness
                 usefulness
                                                                  positive
ITERATION TWO &
                    THREE


• CGIAR: 19   teachers - LAK: 12

• An online survey about usefulness, teacher issues and how
 the tool can resolve these.




                                                              13
ITERATION TWO &
                    THREE


• CGIAR: 19   teachers - LAK: 12

• An online survey about usefulness, teacher issues and how
 the tool can resolve these.




                                                              13
CGIAR              LAK
                                    1     2   3    4   issue for2 add- issue for add-
                                                        5 1         3    4    5
                                                        teacher ressed teacher ressed
         Provide feedback to the
Provide feedback to the students
         students                                        ✔       ?       ✔      ✔
         Being aware of what
Being aware of whatdoing
         students are students are doing                 ✔       ✔       ✔      ?
                                                                 ✗              ✗
         Knowing about collaboration
Knowing and communication * and communication
          about collaboration                            ✔               ✔
                                                                                ?
         Knowing which documents
Knowing are used and how much used and how much
          which documents are                            ✔       ✔       ✔
                                                         ?               ✗      ?
         Knowing how and when
Knowing online and whenbeen used have been used
          how tools have online tools                            ✔
         Finding the students who
         are not doing well
Finding the students who are not doing well              ✔       ?       ✔      ?
        Finding the best students
Finding the best students
        Knowing how much time
                                                         ?       ? ?             ✗
                                                         ?       ✔ ?
        students spent
Knowing Knowing if externalstudents
         how much time learning       spent                                     ✔
                                                                 ? ?             ?
        resources are used
Knowing if external learning resources areIssues
                                           used          ✔Addressed by SAM

                                                                                     14
CGIAR              LAK
                                                   issue for add- issue for add-
                                                    teacher ressed teacher ressed
Provide feedback to the students                     ✔       ?       ✔      ✔
Being aware of what students are doing               ✔       ✔       ✔      ?
Knowing about collaboration and communication        ✔       ✗       ✔      ✗
Knowing which documents are used and how much        ✔       ✔       ✔      ?
Knowing how and when online tools have been used     ?       ✔       ✗      ?
Finding the students who are not doing well          ✔       ?       ✔      ?
Finding the best students                            ?       ? ?             ✗
Knowing how much time students spent                 ?       ✔ ?            ✔
Knowing if external learning resources are used      ✔       ? ?             ?
                                                                                 14
CGIAR              LAK
                                                   issue for add- issue for add-
                                                    teacher ressed teacher ressed
Provide feedback to the students                     ✔       ?       ✔      ✔
Being aware of what students are doing               ✔       ✔       ✔      ?
Knowing about collaboration and communication        ✔       ✗       ✔      ✗
Knowing which documents are used and how much        ✔       ✔       ✔      ?
Knowing how and when online tools have been used     ?       ✔       ✗      ?
Finding the students who are not doing well          ✔       ?       ✔      ?
Finding the best students                            ?       ? ?             ✗
Knowing how much time students spent                 ?       ✔ ?            ✔
Knowing if external learning resources are used      ✔       ? ?             ?
                                                                                 14
CGIAR CASE STUDY




                   15
CGIAR CASE STUDY
 want to search    detect outliers
  for students
                            more details on
good indicator for effort       student
                        understand the workload
  progress evolution
                                      compare students
   obtain course overview
                              increase awareness
want better 1 to 1
 comparison tool          use for course    more metrics
                       design optimization     wanted
                                                       15
CGIAR CASE STUDY
 want to search    detect outliers
  for students
                            more details on
good indicator for effort       student
                        understand the workload
  progress evolution
                                      compare students
   obtain course overview
                              increase awareness
want better 1 to 1
 comparison tool          use for course    more metrics
                       design optimization     wanted
                                                       15
LAK CASE STUDY




                                                                       16
      http://maranash.blogspot.com/2011/01/conference-shout-out.html
LAK CASE STUDY
                                    find students experiencing
                                       problems and low
  verify the status of the                 engagement
    classroom activity
                                                                                       more
        chronological course dwell time                                               metrics
self-reflection to measure
  progress and increase
        motivation                 more data

                                                                                                16
                             http://maranash.blogspot.com/2011/01/conference-shout-out.html
LAK CASE STUDY
                                    find students experiencing
                                       problems and low
  verify the status of the                 engagement
    classroom activity
                                                                                       more
        chronological course dwell time                                               metrics
self-reflection to measure
  progress and increase
        motivation                 more data

                                                                                                16
                             http://maranash.blogspot.com/2011/01/conference-shout-out.html
demogra    evaluation        design
                                                  negative                 positive
        phics       goal          changes

                   usability,                                      •↑learnability
       12 CS     satisfaction,                   small usability   •↓errors
I.                               1st iteration
      students   preliminary                        issues         •good satisfaction
                  usefulness                                       •usefulness positive



                 assessing                                         •provides awareness
         19                                 resource
                  teacher                                          •all vis. useful
II.   teachers              help function recomm. not
               needs, use &                                        •many uses
       & TA’s                                 useful
                usefulness                                         •90% want it


                                                                   •provides awareness
                  assessing   re-orderable
                                                   most            and feedback
        12         teacher       parallel
                                                 addressed         •many uses
III. participan needs, expert coordinates
                                                 needs are         •66% want it
         ts     feedback, use     with
                                                 indecisive        •recomm. can be
                 & usefulness histograms
                                                                   useful
ITERATION FOUR

•a   CS course on C++ programming

• 11   people: 7 teachers, 2 TA’s & 1 course planner

• richer   data set: tracking from programming environment

• qualitative
           study using a structured face-2-face interview
 with 25 open questions.

                                                             18
ITERATION FOUR

•a   CS course on C++ programming

• 11   people: 7 teachers, 2 TA’s & 1 course planner

• richer   data set: tracking from programming environment

• qualitative
           study using a structured face-2-face interview
 with 25 open questions.

                                                             18
ACHIEVABLE TASKS
conflicting visions on get a time
                                   identify students doing
 students doing well summary           well and at risk
     and at risk
                     better course     monitor tool and
                       overview           resource use
   understand time
     spent better

 detect students     course planning
  for assistance
                                           http://www.tdpri.com/forum/telecaster-discussion-
                                         forum/48431-ic503z-cap-52-ri-blackguard-book.html
                                                                                               19
ACHIEVABLE TASKS
conflicting visions on get a time
                                   identify students doing
 students doing well summary           well and at risk
     and at risk
                     better course     monitor tool and
                       overview           resource use
   understand time
     spent better

 detect students     course planning
  for assistance
                                           http://www.tdpri.com/forum/telecaster-discussion-
                                         forum/48431-ic503z-cap-52-ri-blackguard-book.html
                                                                                               19
USABILITY & SATISFACTION

• average   SUS score: 69,69%




                                [Bangor et al. 2008]
                                                       20
USABILITY & SATISFACTION

• average   SUS score: 69,69%
                  all: want to continue using it
                  9/11: give it to students




                                                   [Bangor et al. 2008]
                                                                          20
demo-      evaluation           design
                                                      negative                 positive
      graphics       goal             changes
                     usability,                                      •↑learnability
       12 CS       satisfaction,                     small usability •↓errors
I.                                   1st iteration
      students     preliminary                          issues       •good satisfaction
                    usefulness                                       •usefulness positive
                                                                    •provides awareness
         19      assessing teacher                     resource
                                                                    •all vis. useful
II.   teachers     needs, use &      help function   recomm. not
                                                                    •many uses
       & TA’s       usefulness                           useful
                                                                    •90% want it
                                                                    •provides awareness and
                assessing teacher                       most
        12                           re-orderable                   feedback
                  needs, expert                       addressed
III. participan                        PC with                      •many uses
                 feedback, use &                      needs are
         ts                           histograms                    •66% want it
                    usefulness                        indecisive
                                                                    •recomm. can be useful

                                filter &                         •provides time overview
                                search,              conflicting •provides course
       11                        icons,              visions of     overview
             use, usefulness
IV. teacher                  zooming in               students      •PC assist with detecting
              & satisfaction
    s & TA’s                  line chart,            doing well     problems
                             editing PC              or at risk     •many uses & insights
                                  axes                              •100% want it
CONCLUSION
•   SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better
    awareness.




                                                        22
CONCLUSION
•   SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better
    awareness.

•   SAM enables:




                                                        22
CONCLUSION
•   SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better
    awareness.

•   SAM enables:
    • to   detect potential students doing well and at risk




                                                              22
CONCLUSION
•   SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better
    awareness.

•   SAM enables:
    • to detect potential students doing well and at risk
    • a better course overview




                                                            22
CONCLUSION
•   SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better
    awareness.

•   SAM enables:
    • to detect potential students doing well and at risk
    • a better course overview
    • understanding student time spending




                                                            22
CONCLUSION
•   SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better
    awareness.

•   SAM enables:
    • to detect potential students doing well and at risk
    • a better course overview
    • understanding student time spending
    • to find a wide variety of new insights



                                                            22
CONCLUSION
•   SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better
    awareness.

•   SAM enables:
    • to detect potential students doing well and at risk
    • a better course overview
    • understanding student time spending
    • to find a wide variety of new insights

• almost   all want to continue using SAM
                                                            22
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:




                                                                        23
                   http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:
    • Evaluate   visualisations iteratively and early




                                                                                      23
                                 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:
    • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early
    • Use real-world settings




                                                                                    23
                               http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:
    • Evaluate  visualisations iteratively and early
    • Use real-world settings
    • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating
      awareness




                                                                                    23
                               http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:
    • Evaluate  visualisations iteratively and early
    • Use real-world settings
    • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating
      awareness
•   worked less well:




                                                                                    23
                               http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:
    • Evaluate  visualisations iteratively and early
    • Use real-world settings
    • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating
      awareness
•   worked less well:
    • finding   real-world settings



                                                                                     23
                                http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:
    • Evaluate  visualisations iteratively and early
    • Use real-world settings
    • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating
      awareness
•   worked less well:
    • finding  real-world settings
    • getting tracking data


                                                                                    23
                               http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
LESSONS LEARNED
•   worked well:
    • Evaluate  visualisations iteratively and early
    • Use real-world settings
    • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating
      awareness
•   worked less well:
    • finding real-world settings
   • getting tracking data
• longitudinal study would be useful
                                                                                    23
                               http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
http://www.fitbit.com/




        http://media.cnbc.com/i/CNBC/Sections/
    News_And_Analysis/_News/_SPECIAL_REPORTS/
       BetterYourBusiness_2012/BYB-Digital%20-                    http://quantifiedself.com/
     %20April/Slideshows/Digital_Appliances_ab/10-
          Smart-Dig-Appliances-Wifi-scale-.jpg




http://nikerunning.nike.com/nikeos/p/nikeplus/en_EMEA/sportband




                                                                                              24
LAK13: Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conf.
  8-12 April 2013           Leuven, Belgium




            http://lakconference.org/
2




                contact: sten@cs.kuleuven.be
slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts
                          @erikduval
slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts   26
If you are interested in visualisations and
                            2
  tabletops, we have a PhD position available.




                contact: sten@cs.kuleuven.be
slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts
                          @erikduval
slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts   26

The Student Activity Meter for Awareness and Self-reflection

  • 1.
    THE STUDENT ACTIVITY METERFOR AWARENESS AND SELF-REFLECTION Sten Govaerts, Katrien Verbert, Erik Duval, Abelardo Pardo. SigCHI 2012, Long Case Study. 1
  • 2.
    our team: Human-Computer Interaction •technology enhanced learning • music • research 2.0 2
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    OBJECTIVES • self-monitoring for learners http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm 4
  • 6.
    OBJECTIVES • self-monitoring for learners • awareness for teachers http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm 4
  • 7.
    OBJECTIVES • self-monitoring for learners • awareness for teachers • time tracking http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm 4
  • 8.
    OBJECTIVES • self-monitoring for learners • awareness for teachers • time tracking • learning resource use and recommendations http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm 4
  • 9.
    OBJECTIVES • self-monitoring for learners • awareness for teachers • time tracking • learning resource use and recommendations http://free-extras.com/images/obama_hope_progress-2848.htm • part of Learning Analytics research [ACM LAK conf., Siemens 2011, Duval 2011] 4
  • 10.
    STUDENT ACTIVITY METER (SAM): DEMO. http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2000-02-24/ 5
  • 11.
  • 12.
    GISMO http://www.noe-kaleidoscope.org/pub/researcher/resources/video/aied/mazza.html
  • 13.
    The Participation Tool http://www.cs.uu.nl/docs/vakken/uem/Janssen.pdf
  • 14.
    METHODOLOGY. • design-basedresearch [Obrenović2011]: design a tool, give students & teachers and evaluate • iterative process of design & evaluation • paper mockups • usability studies • surveys on usefulness http://funnytogo.com/pictures/evolution/timeline.htm 9
  • 15.
    iter. evaluation goal methodology demo-graphics data usability, satisfaction, task-based interview 12 CS students timetracking I. preliminary with think-aloud, SUS at KULeuven via Twitter usefulness & MSDT assessing teacher online survey with 19 teachers & II. needs, use & Likert items, yes/no TA’s with Moodle logs usefulness and open questions CGIAR courses assessing teacher online survey with 12 participants needs, expert III. Likert items, yes/no from LAK Moodle logs feedback, use & and open questions MOOC usefulness structured face-to-face 11 teachers & VM with use, usefulness & IV. interview with tasks & TA’s at Carlos III extensive satisfaction open questions Uni. Madrid tool tracking 10
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    demogra evaluation design negative positive phics goal changes •↑learnability usability, •↓errors 12 CS satisfaction, small usability I. 1st iteration •good satisfaction students preliminary issues •usefulness usefulness positive
  • 19.
    ITERATION TWO & THREE • CGIAR: 19 teachers - LAK: 12 • An online survey about usefulness, teacher issues and how the tool can resolve these. 13
  • 20.
    ITERATION TWO & THREE • CGIAR: 19 teachers - LAK: 12 • An online survey about usefulness, teacher issues and how the tool can resolve these. 13
  • 21.
    CGIAR LAK 1 2 3 4 issue for2 add- issue for add- 5 1 3 4 5 teacher ressed teacher ressed Provide feedback to the Provide feedback to the students students ✔ ? ✔ ✔ Being aware of what Being aware of whatdoing students are students are doing ✔ ✔ ✔ ? ✗ ✗ Knowing about collaboration Knowing and communication * and communication about collaboration ✔ ✔ ? Knowing which documents Knowing are used and how much used and how much which documents are ✔ ✔ ✔ ? ✗ ? Knowing how and when Knowing online and whenbeen used have been used how tools have online tools ✔ Finding the students who are not doing well Finding the students who are not doing well ✔ ? ✔ ? Finding the best students Finding the best students Knowing how much time ? ? ? ✗ ? ✔ ? students spent Knowing Knowing if externalstudents how much time learning spent ✔ ? ? ? resources are used Knowing if external learning resources areIssues used ✔Addressed by SAM 14
  • 22.
    CGIAR LAK issue for add- issue for add- teacher ressed teacher ressed Provide feedback to the students ✔ ? ✔ ✔ Being aware of what students are doing ✔ ✔ ✔ ? Knowing about collaboration and communication ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ Knowing which documents are used and how much ✔ ✔ ✔ ? Knowing how and when online tools have been used ? ✔ ✗ ? Finding the students who are not doing well ✔ ? ✔ ? Finding the best students ? ? ? ✗ Knowing how much time students spent ? ✔ ? ✔ Knowing if external learning resources are used ✔ ? ? ? 14
  • 23.
    CGIAR LAK issue for add- issue for add- teacher ressed teacher ressed Provide feedback to the students ✔ ? ✔ ✔ Being aware of what students are doing ✔ ✔ ✔ ? Knowing about collaboration and communication ✔ ✗ ✔ ✗ Knowing which documents are used and how much ✔ ✔ ✔ ? Knowing how and when online tools have been used ? ✔ ✗ ? Finding the students who are not doing well ✔ ? ✔ ? Finding the best students ? ? ? ✗ Knowing how much time students spent ? ✔ ? ✔ Knowing if external learning resources are used ✔ ? ? ? 14
  • 24.
  • 25.
    CGIAR CASE STUDY want to search detect outliers for students more details on good indicator for effort student understand the workload progress evolution compare students obtain course overview increase awareness want better 1 to 1 comparison tool use for course more metrics design optimization wanted 15
  • 26.
    CGIAR CASE STUDY want to search detect outliers for students more details on good indicator for effort student understand the workload progress evolution compare students obtain course overview increase awareness want better 1 to 1 comparison tool use for course more metrics design optimization wanted 15
  • 27.
    LAK CASE STUDY 16 http://maranash.blogspot.com/2011/01/conference-shout-out.html
  • 28.
    LAK CASE STUDY find students experiencing problems and low verify the status of the engagement classroom activity more chronological course dwell time metrics self-reflection to measure progress and increase motivation more data 16 http://maranash.blogspot.com/2011/01/conference-shout-out.html
  • 29.
    LAK CASE STUDY find students experiencing problems and low verify the status of the engagement classroom activity more chronological course dwell time metrics self-reflection to measure progress and increase motivation more data 16 http://maranash.blogspot.com/2011/01/conference-shout-out.html
  • 30.
    demogra evaluation design negative positive phics goal changes usability, •↑learnability 12 CS satisfaction, small usability •↓errors I. 1st iteration students preliminary issues •good satisfaction usefulness •usefulness positive assessing •provides awareness 19 resource teacher •all vis. useful II. teachers help function recomm. not needs, use & •many uses & TA’s useful usefulness •90% want it •provides awareness assessing re-orderable most and feedback 12 teacher parallel addressed •many uses III. participan needs, expert coordinates needs are •66% want it ts feedback, use with indecisive •recomm. can be & usefulness histograms useful
  • 31.
    ITERATION FOUR •a CS course on C++ programming • 11 people: 7 teachers, 2 TA’s & 1 course planner • richer data set: tracking from programming environment • qualitative study using a structured face-2-face interview with 25 open questions. 18
  • 32.
    ITERATION FOUR •a CS course on C++ programming • 11 people: 7 teachers, 2 TA’s & 1 course planner • richer data set: tracking from programming environment • qualitative study using a structured face-2-face interview with 25 open questions. 18
  • 33.
    ACHIEVABLE TASKS conflicting visionson get a time identify students doing students doing well summary well and at risk and at risk better course monitor tool and overview resource use understand time spent better detect students course planning for assistance http://www.tdpri.com/forum/telecaster-discussion- forum/48431-ic503z-cap-52-ri-blackguard-book.html 19
  • 34.
    ACHIEVABLE TASKS conflicting visionson get a time identify students doing students doing well summary well and at risk and at risk better course monitor tool and overview resource use understand time spent better detect students course planning for assistance http://www.tdpri.com/forum/telecaster-discussion- forum/48431-ic503z-cap-52-ri-blackguard-book.html 19
  • 35.
    USABILITY & SATISFACTION •average SUS score: 69,69% [Bangor et al. 2008] 20
  • 36.
    USABILITY & SATISFACTION •average SUS score: 69,69% all: want to continue using it 9/11: give it to students [Bangor et al. 2008] 20
  • 37.
    demo- evaluation design negative positive graphics goal changes usability, •↑learnability 12 CS satisfaction, small usability •↓errors I. 1st iteration students preliminary issues •good satisfaction usefulness •usefulness positive •provides awareness 19 assessing teacher resource •all vis. useful II. teachers needs, use & help function recomm. not •many uses & TA’s usefulness useful •90% want it •provides awareness and assessing teacher most 12 re-orderable feedback needs, expert addressed III. participan PC with •many uses feedback, use & needs are ts histograms •66% want it usefulness indecisive •recomm. can be useful filter & •provides time overview search, conflicting •provides course 11 icons, visions of overview use, usefulness IV. teacher zooming in students •PC assist with detecting & satisfaction s & TA’s line chart, doing well problems editing PC or at risk •many uses & insights axes •100% want it
  • 38.
    CONCLUSION • SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better awareness. 22
  • 39.
    CONCLUSION • SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better awareness. • SAM enables: 22
  • 40.
    CONCLUSION • SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better awareness. • SAM enables: • to detect potential students doing well and at risk 22
  • 41.
    CONCLUSION • SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better awareness. • SAM enables: • to detect potential students doing well and at risk • a better course overview 22
  • 42.
    CONCLUSION • SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better awareness. • SAM enables: • to detect potential students doing well and at risk • a better course overview • understanding student time spending 22
  • 43.
    CONCLUSION • SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better awareness. • SAM enables: • to detect potential students doing well and at risk • a better course overview • understanding student time spending • to find a wide variety of new insights 22
  • 44.
    CONCLUSION • SAM is perceived useful and contributes to better awareness. • SAM enables: • to detect potential students doing well and at risk • a better course overview • understanding student time spending • to find a wide variety of new insights • almost all want to continue using SAM 22
  • 45.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 46.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 47.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early • Use real-world settings 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 48.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early • Use real-world settings • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating awareness 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 49.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early • Use real-world settings • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating awareness • worked less well: 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 50.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early • Use real-world settings • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating awareness • worked less well: • finding real-world settings 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 51.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early • Use real-world settings • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating awareness • worked less well: • finding real-world settings • getting tracking data 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 52.
    LESSONS LEARNED • worked well: • Evaluate visualisations iteratively and early • Use real-world settings • Visualisations are powerful tool for creating awareness • worked less well: • finding real-world settings • getting tracking data • longitudinal study would be useful 23 http://slurmed.com/fanart/dexus5/005_professor.png
  • 53.
    http://www.fitbit.com/ http://media.cnbc.com/i/CNBC/Sections/ News_And_Analysis/_News/_SPECIAL_REPORTS/ BetterYourBusiness_2012/BYB-Digital%20- http://quantifiedself.com/ %20April/Slideshows/Digital_Appliances_ab/10- Smart-Dig-Appliances-Wifi-scale-.jpg http://nikerunning.nike.com/nikeos/p/nikeplus/en_EMEA/sportband 24
  • 54.
    LAK13: Learning Analyticsand Knowledge Conf. 8-12 April 2013 Leuven, Belgium http://lakconference.org/
  • 55.
    2 contact: sten@cs.kuleuven.be slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts @erikduval slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts 26
  • 56.
    If you areinterested in visualisations and 2 tabletops, we have a PhD position available. contact: sten@cs.kuleuven.be slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts @erikduval slides will appear on http://www.slideshare.net/stengovaerts 26