The Experiential Essence of
 Entrepreneurial Cognition:
    How Understanding
  Entrepreneurial Thinking
Enhances Teaching & Practice

       Norris Krueger, PhD –
    Entrepreneurship Northwest
            July 2012
http://www.youtube.com/wat
    ch?v=exmwSxv7XJI
See a difference/




                    3
We know how to teach individuals
(and organizations and communities)
  to think more entrepreneurially, to
   truly make a difference; we now
       understand why and how.
Overview
   Important new theory & evidence
   Replicable models of entrepreneurial
    learning
   Antecedents & consequences of
    entrepreneurial learning
   Implications for teaching, practice,
    public policy
   Important new theory & evidence

   Critical review:
      entrepreneurial cognition
      entrepreneurial learning
      processes

   Exciting new multi-disciplinary
    opportunities
      e.g. neuro-entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurial Thinking:
           A primer?
   Intentions:
      From intent to “informed” intent?

   Basic model:
Entrepreneurial Intentions

Personal Desirability

                        Perceived
                        Desirability
Perceived
Social Norms
                             PERCEPTION of
                             OPPORTUNITY                    INTENTIONS   Action


Perceived
Self-Efficacy
                        Perceived            Precipitating Event
                        Feasibility
Perceived
Collective Efficacy
Entrepreneurial Learning:
          from Novice to Expert!
   Knowledge Content? or Structure?

   Perceived Barriers?
   Pattern recognition?

   Deep Beliefs (role identity?)
   Importance of understanding
    entrepreneurial emotion

   Understanding cognitive change...
Two Ways to Learn

          Behavioristic
           - fill the bucket
         -define the buckets

        Constructivistic
      - light the fire (or fan it!)
- assume knowledge structures evolve
       (often discontinuously)
Change in what we
              know (content)




Novice       Entrepreneurial
                Mindset             Expert



         Change in how we know it
          (knowledge structures)


           Change in Deep Beliefs


         Critical Developmental
               Experiences




                                             11
Key Mechanisms

   What truly induces transformative
    learning?

   Key developmental experiences?

   What do entrepreneurship classes
    actually do?
   HOW do we support? (ecosystem?)
Transformative Learning
•    There is excellent theory to support
      –   Constructivism
      –   Mental prototyping, role identity
      –   Cognitive developmental psych
      –   Cognitive & social neuroscience

•    There is excellent empirical evidence
      –   Even in entrepreneurial settings!
      –   Changes in key mental prototypes
      •   And a lot more data about to be released
      •    2011: ISEEO, GUESSS; 2012: Neergaard
Keys to Transformative
           Learning
•    “Book Throwing”
       –      Constructivist versus Behaviorist
       –      Entrep educators have always been
              constructivistic (cue Voltaire)
•    Neuro-entrepreneurship?*
       –      Neuroplasticity
       –      Emotions
       –      Deep beliefs (Neo, take the...)
•    Centrality of Action
    * if curious http://www.slideshare.net/norriskrueger/icsb-
     2010-neuroentrepreneurship
Accelerating Learning
•   Problem-Based Learning (“authentic”
    questions)
•   Two overlapping themes:
•   IMMERSION – Action before thinking
•   MENTORING – Learn the right lessons
      –       Expert mentors
      –       Peer mentors

      –       Or THREE? Ecosystem that supports all of
              this?
          –     Social infrastructure; cognitive infrastructure
          –     http://bit/ly/EcoSys
So what IS this “entrepreneurial
           mindset” anyway??
• Thoughts? Which are the hardest to change?
      –   (More important for here... what can we measure?)
Seeing opportunities
• Seeing self as entrepreneur (role identity)
• Strategic thinking
• Dot-connecting / pattern recognition
• Effectual thinking (bricolage, improv)
• Optimist (attributional)
• Metacognition
• Counterfactual thinking
• Bias for action (vs. FoF!)
• Value creation as sine qua non (Market-pull?)
Replicable models of
      entrepreneurial learning
   Key entrepreneurial training
    methods maximize entrepreneurial
    learning
      deep, transformative learning
   Existing practices that demonstrably
    grow entrepreneurial thinking
   Concrete examples:
      program level
      course level
Existing Best Practices
   that demonstrably grow
    entrepreneurial thinking...
      Action learning
        e.g., Living cases

      Problem-based learning
      Counterfactual thinking
      Explicit script building
      Active reflection (collaborative)
But….
   Not just universities

   It is the entire ecosystem

   Follow the entrepreneurs

   Help them!
Immersion/Mentoring
   Chalmers/Gothenburg
   NU Singapore
   The Foundry (Utah)
      http://business.utah.edu/node/1203/
   TechStars (www.techstars.org)
   Startup Weekend
      www.startupweekend.org
   Lean Startup
      http://www.slideshare.net/sblank/successful
      -entrepreneurship-1
Critical Implications
   For teaching? For training?

   For practice?

   For public policy?

   (and... for research?)
Implications: Teaching
   Need to be constructivistic
   Need to understand entrepreneurial
    thinking
   Need to understand expert thinking
   Need to address deep beliefs
   Instructor MUST understand – or
    share- the expert mindset.
Implications: Public Policy
   Entrepreneurial Potential = F(quantity
    and quality of potential entrepreneurs)
   Promote educational activities that
    nurture expert entrepreneurial thinking .
   Support similar mechanisms for
    growing an entrepreneurial community
   Program leaders MUST understand –
    or share- the expert mindset.
Implications: for
            Entrepreneurs
   Work toward expert thinking – lifelong
    process?
   Understand their own deep beliefs
   Good entrepreneurs are good at dot-
    connecting; great entrepreneurs...
   Make sure your advisors understand
    the “Entrepreneur Mind”(tm).
To those who want to really
         make a difference:
   We know how to teach individuals
    (and organizations and
    communities) to think more
    entrepreneurially.

   We now understand why and how.

   How can we translate these insights
    into helping communities
    worldwide?
If you want to get involved in
    projects – research or applied:
   Norris Krueger:
      norris.krueger@gmail.com
      @entrep_thinking
      Facebook
      LinkedIn
Implications: Research
   Focus on expert entrepreneurial
    thinking
   Focus on emotions
   Focus on cognitive change
   Focus on deep cognitive change
   Take advantage of:
      Multi-disciplinary approaches
      New tools – theory & method
   Take advantage of... us
Research Agenda:
Antecedents & Consequences
   Antecedents
     Impact of teaching/training methods
     Impact of instructor characteristics (e.g.,
     mental models)
     Impact of context (including students)
     Developmental experiences?
Research Agenda:
Antecedents & Consequences
   Consequences
     Change in intent (Informed intent?)
     Change in knowledge content?
     Change in knowledge structure?
     Change in deep beliefs?
     How will we know?
         Better dot-connecting?
         Amygdala lights up differently?

The Experiential Essence of Entrepreneurial Learning

  • 1.
    The Experiential Essenceof Entrepreneurial Cognition: How Understanding Entrepreneurial Thinking Enhances Teaching & Practice Norris Krueger, PhD – Entrepreneurship Northwest July 2012
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    We know howto teach individuals (and organizations and communities) to think more entrepreneurially, to truly make a difference; we now understand why and how.
  • 5.
    Overview  Important new theory & evidence  Replicable models of entrepreneurial learning  Antecedents & consequences of entrepreneurial learning  Implications for teaching, practice, public policy
  • 6.
    Important new theory & evidence  Critical review: entrepreneurial cognition entrepreneurial learning processes  Exciting new multi-disciplinary opportunities e.g. neuro-entrepreneurship
  • 7.
    Entrepreneurial Thinking: A primer?  Intentions: From intent to “informed” intent?  Basic model:
  • 8.
    Entrepreneurial Intentions Personal Desirability Perceived Desirability Perceived Social Norms PERCEPTION of OPPORTUNITY INTENTIONS Action Perceived Self-Efficacy Perceived Precipitating Event Feasibility Perceived Collective Efficacy
  • 9.
    Entrepreneurial Learning: from Novice to Expert!  Knowledge Content? or Structure?  Perceived Barriers?  Pattern recognition?  Deep Beliefs (role identity?)  Importance of understanding entrepreneurial emotion  Understanding cognitive change...
  • 10.
    Two Ways toLearn Behavioristic - fill the bucket -define the buckets Constructivistic - light the fire (or fan it!) - assume knowledge structures evolve (often discontinuously)
  • 11.
    Change in whatwe know (content) Novice Entrepreneurial Mindset Expert Change in how we know it (knowledge structures) Change in Deep Beliefs Critical Developmental Experiences 11
  • 12.
    Key Mechanisms  What truly induces transformative learning?  Key developmental experiences?  What do entrepreneurship classes actually do?  HOW do we support? (ecosystem?)
  • 13.
    Transformative Learning • There is excellent theory to support – Constructivism – Mental prototyping, role identity – Cognitive developmental psych – Cognitive & social neuroscience • There is excellent empirical evidence – Even in entrepreneurial settings! – Changes in key mental prototypes • And a lot more data about to be released • 2011: ISEEO, GUESSS; 2012: Neergaard
  • 14.
    Keys to Transformative Learning • “Book Throwing” – Constructivist versus Behaviorist – Entrep educators have always been constructivistic (cue Voltaire) • Neuro-entrepreneurship?* – Neuroplasticity – Emotions – Deep beliefs (Neo, take the...) • Centrality of Action * if curious http://www.slideshare.net/norriskrueger/icsb- 2010-neuroentrepreneurship
  • 15.
    Accelerating Learning • Problem-Based Learning (“authentic” questions) • Two overlapping themes: • IMMERSION – Action before thinking • MENTORING – Learn the right lessons – Expert mentors – Peer mentors – Or THREE? Ecosystem that supports all of this? – Social infrastructure; cognitive infrastructure – http://bit/ly/EcoSys
  • 16.
    So what ISthis “entrepreneurial mindset” anyway?? • Thoughts? Which are the hardest to change? – (More important for here... what can we measure?) Seeing opportunities • Seeing self as entrepreneur (role identity) • Strategic thinking • Dot-connecting / pattern recognition • Effectual thinking (bricolage, improv) • Optimist (attributional) • Metacognition • Counterfactual thinking • Bias for action (vs. FoF!) • Value creation as sine qua non (Market-pull?)
  • 17.
    Replicable models of entrepreneurial learning  Key entrepreneurial training methods maximize entrepreneurial learning deep, transformative learning  Existing practices that demonstrably grow entrepreneurial thinking  Concrete examples: program level course level
  • 18.
    Existing Best Practices  that demonstrably grow entrepreneurial thinking... Action learning  e.g., Living cases Problem-based learning Counterfactual thinking Explicit script building Active reflection (collaborative)
  • 19.
    But….  Not just universities  It is the entire ecosystem  Follow the entrepreneurs  Help them!
  • 20.
    Immersion/Mentoring  Chalmers/Gothenburg  NU Singapore  The Foundry (Utah) http://business.utah.edu/node/1203/  TechStars (www.techstars.org)  Startup Weekend www.startupweekend.org  Lean Startup http://www.slideshare.net/sblank/successful -entrepreneurship-1
  • 21.
    Critical Implications  For teaching? For training?  For practice?  For public policy?  (and... for research?)
  • 22.
    Implications: Teaching  Need to be constructivistic  Need to understand entrepreneurial thinking  Need to understand expert thinking  Need to address deep beliefs  Instructor MUST understand – or share- the expert mindset.
  • 23.
    Implications: Public Policy  Entrepreneurial Potential = F(quantity and quality of potential entrepreneurs)  Promote educational activities that nurture expert entrepreneurial thinking .  Support similar mechanisms for growing an entrepreneurial community  Program leaders MUST understand – or share- the expert mindset.
  • 24.
    Implications: for Entrepreneurs  Work toward expert thinking – lifelong process?  Understand their own deep beliefs  Good entrepreneurs are good at dot- connecting; great entrepreneurs...  Make sure your advisors understand the “Entrepreneur Mind”(tm).
  • 25.
    To those whowant to really make a difference:  We know how to teach individuals (and organizations and communities) to think more entrepreneurially.  We now understand why and how.  How can we translate these insights into helping communities worldwide?
  • 26.
    If you wantto get involved in projects – research or applied:  Norris Krueger: norris.krueger@gmail.com @entrep_thinking Facebook LinkedIn
  • 27.
    Implications: Research  Focus on expert entrepreneurial thinking  Focus on emotions  Focus on cognitive change  Focus on deep cognitive change  Take advantage of: Multi-disciplinary approaches New tools – theory & method  Take advantage of... us
  • 28.
    Research Agenda: Antecedents &Consequences  Antecedents Impact of teaching/training methods Impact of instructor characteristics (e.g., mental models) Impact of context (including students) Developmental experiences?
  • 29.
    Research Agenda: Antecedents &Consequences  Consequences Change in intent (Informed intent?) Change in knowledge content? Change in knowledge structure? Change in deep beliefs? How will we know?  Better dot-connecting?  Amygdala lights up differently?