The document defines key terms related to assessment such as tests, assessment, evaluation, and measurement. It discusses trends in assessment and the purposes of assessment in teaching and learning. Assessment can be formative or summative. Different types of assessments include tests, projects, portfolios, and self-reflection. Tests can provide information about students' strengths, weaknesses, and placement. Reliability, validity, practicality, objectivity, washback effect, and authenticity are important principles of assessment.
This document discusses validity, reliability, and washback in language testing. Validity refers to a test measuring what it intends to measure, which includes content validity (testing relevant skills and concepts) and criterion-related validity (how test results agree with other assessment results). Reliability means a test is repeatable, which can be measured through reliability coefficients. Washback refers to how a test influences teaching and learning, with the goal of achieving positive washback that encourages effective preparation. Ensuring validity, reliability, and beneficial washback requires careful test construction and use of techniques like setting test specifications, direct testing of objectives, and providing clear scoring criteria.
The document provides guidance on developing tests and assessments. It discusses determining test objectives and population, planning with test specifications, writing test items, preparing appropriate formats, reviewing items, pre-testing, and validating items. Test specifications serve as a blueprint and should include an outline, skills assessed, and item types. Taxonomies like Bloom's and SOLO can help classify learning outcomes and assess complexity. Sample test formats are also outlined, such as for the SPM 1119 English exam in Malaysia. The goal is to develop valid and reliable assessments that accurately measure the intended objectives.
This document discusses different types of tests and assessments. It defines formative and summative assessment, and describes various types of tests including proficiency tests, achievement tests, diagnostic tests, and placement tests. It also discusses the differences between direct and indirect testing, discrete point and integrative tests, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests, and objective and subjective tests. The document provides examples and details on how each type of test is designed and scored.
This document outlines the steps to design an effective test. It discusses that tests should be valid in measuring the skills and content taught, reliable in producing consistent results, and practical to develop without excessive time or resources. The planning stage involves specifying the test's use and ensuring authentic tasks. Tests should sample across language skills and content areas. The development stage includes compiling materials, selecting appropriate question formats and clear instructions, setting scoring criteria, and analyzing and revising based on results to improve teaching.
This document discusses different techniques for testing, including:
1) Direct testing measures specific skills directly, while indirect testing measures underlying abilities. Semi-direct testing simulates direct testing through recorded responses.
2) Discrete point testing examines elements individually, while integrative testing requires combining multiple elements for a task.
3) Norm-referenced testing interprets scores relative to others, while criterion-referenced testing measures against a standard.
4) Objective tests have a single right answer, while subjective tests consider multiple factors in scoring open-ended responses.
A presentation about different types of assessment tools that can be use in assessing language. There are also some meaningful insights about language test and language assessment
The document discusses the process of test construction. It describes the key steps as including planning, design, and development. In the planning phase, test developers must decide the goal, format, and tasks for the test. In the design phase, material is collected and draft versions are written and evaluated. The development phase involves piloting the test on sample users and revising it based on analysis of piloting results to determine validity and reliability before finalizing the test. The overall process emphasizes iterative development, evaluation, and refinement of test items and versions.
The document defines key terms related to assessment such as tests, assessment, evaluation, and measurement. It discusses trends in assessment and the purposes of assessment in teaching and learning. Assessment can be formative or summative. Different types of assessments include tests, projects, portfolios, and self-reflection. Tests can provide information about students' strengths, weaknesses, and placement. Reliability, validity, practicality, objectivity, washback effect, and authenticity are important principles of assessment.
This document discusses validity, reliability, and washback in language testing. Validity refers to a test measuring what it intends to measure, which includes content validity (testing relevant skills and concepts) and criterion-related validity (how test results agree with other assessment results). Reliability means a test is repeatable, which can be measured through reliability coefficients. Washback refers to how a test influences teaching and learning, with the goal of achieving positive washback that encourages effective preparation. Ensuring validity, reliability, and beneficial washback requires careful test construction and use of techniques like setting test specifications, direct testing of objectives, and providing clear scoring criteria.
The document provides guidance on developing tests and assessments. It discusses determining test objectives and population, planning with test specifications, writing test items, preparing appropriate formats, reviewing items, pre-testing, and validating items. Test specifications serve as a blueprint and should include an outline, skills assessed, and item types. Taxonomies like Bloom's and SOLO can help classify learning outcomes and assess complexity. Sample test formats are also outlined, such as for the SPM 1119 English exam in Malaysia. The goal is to develop valid and reliable assessments that accurately measure the intended objectives.
This document discusses different types of tests and assessments. It defines formative and summative assessment, and describes various types of tests including proficiency tests, achievement tests, diagnostic tests, and placement tests. It also discusses the differences between direct and indirect testing, discrete point and integrative tests, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests, and objective and subjective tests. The document provides examples and details on how each type of test is designed and scored.
This document outlines the steps to design an effective test. It discusses that tests should be valid in measuring the skills and content taught, reliable in producing consistent results, and practical to develop without excessive time or resources. The planning stage involves specifying the test's use and ensuring authentic tasks. Tests should sample across language skills and content areas. The development stage includes compiling materials, selecting appropriate question formats and clear instructions, setting scoring criteria, and analyzing and revising based on results to improve teaching.
This document discusses different techniques for testing, including:
1) Direct testing measures specific skills directly, while indirect testing measures underlying abilities. Semi-direct testing simulates direct testing through recorded responses.
2) Discrete point testing examines elements individually, while integrative testing requires combining multiple elements for a task.
3) Norm-referenced testing interprets scores relative to others, while criterion-referenced testing measures against a standard.
4) Objective tests have a single right answer, while subjective tests consider multiple factors in scoring open-ended responses.
A presentation about different types of assessment tools that can be use in assessing language. There are also some meaningful insights about language test and language assessment
The document discusses the process of test construction. It describes the key steps as including planning, design, and development. In the planning phase, test developers must decide the goal, format, and tasks for the test. In the design phase, material is collected and draft versions are written and evaluated. The development phase involves piloting the test on sample users and revising it based on analysis of piloting results to determine validity and reliability before finalizing the test. The overall process emphasizes iterative development, evaluation, and refinement of test items and versions.
This document provides an overview of key concepts and issues related to language assessment. It begins by defining common terms like assessment, testing, measurement and evaluation. It then describes different types of assessment including formal/informal and formative/summative. Issues discussed include discrete-point vs integrative testing and traditional vs alternative assessments. Current topics like computer-based testing and views of intelligence are also covered. The document aims to outline the concepts, methods and debates within the field of language assessment.
Language testing and evaluation validity and reliability.Vadher Ankita
This document discusses validity and reliability in language testing. It defines different types of validity including content validity, construct validity, criterion validity (concurrent and predictive validity), and face validity. It also explains how to judge the validity of a test and ensures it measures what it intends to measure. The document also defines different types of reliability such as equivalency, stability, internal, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability. It provides examples of how each type is measured to ensure consistency in testing.
This document discusses different types of language tests and their properties. It describes proficiency tests which measure overall language ability regardless of training, and achievement tests which assess specific taught elements. It also covers diagnostic tests which identify strengths/weaknesses, placement tests which determine appropriate learning levels, and direct versus indirect testing. The document also discusses test reliability, validity, common objective task types like multiple choice, and how tests can positively or negatively impact language teaching through washback effects.
The document discusses the development of objective assessment tools. It begins by outlining the intended learning outcomes, which are to define concepts related to objective tests, develop valid and reliable objective tests, and evaluate objective tests. It then discusses the rationale for assessment, including improving student learning and teaching. The types of objective tests are defined, including selection and supply types. The steps in planning an objective test are outlined, including identifying test objectives, deciding on the test type, and preparing a table of specifications. Characteristics of good tests like validity and reliability are also discussed.
This document summarizes four types of language tests: proficiency tests, achievement tests, diagnostic tests, and placement tests. It provides details about each type of test, including their purposes, content, advantages, and disadvantages. Proficiency tests measure overall language ability regardless of training, while achievement tests measure success in achieving course objectives. Diagnostic tests identify strengths and weaknesses, and placement tests are used to assign students to appropriate class levels. The document also discusses additional topics in language testing such as direct vs indirect testing, and objective vs subjective scoring.
The document discusses various techniques for testing English grammar, including:
1. Gap filling items that test specific grammatical structures by having students complete sentences.
2. Cloze tests that are prose passages with words deleted for students to supply based on context.
3. Multiple choice grammar questions that test structures through sentence completion.
It provides examples and guidance on preparing different grammar test items, ensuring clear instructions, using appropriate contexts, and avoiding distractors that confuse students. The goal is to effectively test mastery of specific grammatical concepts.
The document discusses various topics related to testing, assessing, and teaching including the differences between tests, assessments, teaching, evaluation, formative and summative assessments, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests, discrete-point and integrative testing, communicative language testing, performance-based assessment, and computer-based testing. Key points made include that assessment is an integral part of the teaching-learning cycle, both informal and formal assessments have roles to play, and tests when used appropriately can provide motivation and feedback to learners.
This document discusses different types of language tests and testing, including proficiency tests, achievement tests, diagnostic tests, placement tests, direct and indirect testing, discrete point and integrative testing, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced testing, objective and subjective testing, and computer adaptive testing. It provides details on the purpose and characteristics of each type of test.
Language testing involves developing and administering tests to evaluate an individual's proficiency in a language, including their knowledge, ability to discriminate, and different types of skills like achievement, proficiency, and aptitude. Tests are used to determine what a student has learned according to content standards and policies, and performance standards evaluate skills like reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Language evaluation also gauges student growth and development against learning objectives.
In this PowerPoint presentation you can find a summary of the ideas presented in the Chapter 12 of Testing for Language Teachers by Arthur Hughes. This chapter is devoted to different key aspects about testing listening. These ideas are also combined at the end of the presentation with other supplementary ideas from the British Council and a PPT created by Kia Karavas.
Testing writing (for Language Teachers)Wenlie Jean
The document discusses the key considerations for properly testing writing ability. It identifies four main problems in testing: 1) using representative tasks, 2) eliciting valid writing samples, 3) ensuring scores are valid and reliable, and 4) providing feedback. For each, it outlines various factors that test designers should take into account such as specifying all content domains, including a representative task sample, restricting candidates, using appropriate scoring scales, and calibrating scorers. The goal is to develop writing tests that accurately measure students' abilities.
The document outlines 9 stages of test construction: 1) Planning, 2) Preparing items, 3) Establishing validity, 4) Reliability, 5) Arranging items, 6) Writing directions, 7) Analyzing and revising, 8) Reproducing, and 9) Administering and scoring. It discusses key considerations at each stage such as writing items according to specifications, establishing content and criterion validity, determining reliability through various methods, and ensuring the test is objective, comprehensive, simple, and practical. The final stages cover arranging items by difficulty, providing clear directions, analyzing item performance, and properly administering the test.
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptxAREEJ ALDAEJ
The document discusses needs analysis for syllabus design in teaching English. It defines needs analysis and syllabus design, outlines the history and purposes of needs analysis, and classifications of needs. The document also describes steps for designing a syllabus based on needs analysis, provides an example research study on needs analysis conducted in Albania, and discusses the role of teachers in needs analysis.
This document discusses course planning and syllabus design. It begins by outlining topics that will be covered, including developing a course rationale, preparing a scope and sequence plan, and planning course content and structure. It then provides details on developing a course rationale by answering questions about who the course is for and what will be taught. Examples of course rationales are given. The document also discusses choosing course content, describing student entry and exit levels, and various approaches to syllabus design, including grammatical, lexical, functional, situational, and integrated syllabuses. Factors to consider in selecting a syllabus framework and developing instructional blocks are also outlined.
This document summarizes key aspects of curriculum design approaches from chapters 9 and 10 of the book "Language Curriculum Design" by I.S.P Nation and John Macalister. It discusses three common approaches to the curriculum design process: the waterfall model, focused opportunistic approach, and layers of necessity model. It also covers negotiated syllabuses, where teachers work with learners to make joint decisions about curriculum design elements. Requirements for implementing a negotiated syllabus include establishing negotiation procedures, planning course content and activities, setting learning goals, and evaluating outcomes.
Developments in English For Specific Purposes A multidisciplinary Approach ch...farhadmax69
This document discusses parameters for course design, including whether the course should be intensive or extensive, assessed or non-assessed, focused on immediate or delayed needs, and other factors. It provides definitions and considerations for different course design approaches. The document also outlines steps for developing a course outline, including ordering target events and skills, selecting materials, developing a timetable, and planning for assessment and evaluation. The overall aim is to provide guidance for taking an integrated approach to course design based on learner needs and context.
This document provides guidance on effective test design for language assessments. It discusses key considerations for tests including usefulness, validity, reliability, practicality, washback, authenticity and transparency. It also covers determining learning objectives, aligning assessments and instruction, and different types of test items for evaluating listening, reading, grammar, vocabulary and language functions. The document stresses the importance of ensuring tests are well-aligned with classroom instruction and reflect authentic language use. It also addresses controversial issues in language testing.
The document discusses various techniques for evaluating educational curriculum and programs. It describes evaluation as collecting data to determine the value of a program and whether it should be adopted, rejected, or revised. Several data collection techniques are examined, including observation, interviews, questionnaires, tests, and assessments. Tests are categorized based on their purpose, format, and standards. The document emphasizes that using the right technique for a given evaluation is important to obtain accurate information and make better decisions.
Language testing is the practice of evaluating an individual's proficiency in using a particular language. There are two main types of assessment: formative assessment which checks student progress, and summative assessment which measures achievement at the end of a term. There are five common types of language tests: proficiency tests which measure overall ability, achievement tests related to course content, diagnostic tests which identify strengths and weaknesses, placement tests for assigning students to class levels, and direct/indirect tests. The effect of testing on teaching is known as backwash, which can be harmful if not aligned with course objectives, or beneficial if tests influence instructional changes.
ggfgggvfghghhhhh Competencies
-A general statement that describes the use of desired knowledge, skills, behaviors and abilities. Competencies often define specific applied skills and knowledge that enables people to successfully perform specific functions in a work or educational setting. Some examples include:
Functional competencies
Skills that are required to use on a daily or regular basis, such as cognitive, methodological, technological and linguistic abilities
Interpersonal competencies
Oral, written and visual communication skills, as well as the ability to work effectively with diverse teams
Critical thinking competencies
The ability to reason effectively, use systems thinking and make judgments and decisions toward solving complex problems
•A key differentiator between learning competencies, objectives and outcomes is that learning objectives are the specific abilities necessary to accomplish the learning competency.
Learning Objectives
•A statement that describes what a faculty member will cover in a course and what a course will have provided students. They are generally broader than student learning outcomes. For example, “By the end of the course, students will use change theory to develop family-centered care within the context of nursing practice.” Statements like this help determine what the student learned and what the teacher taught.
•Overall, learning objectives determine what the course will have provided to the student. Both learning outcomes and learning objectives are used to gauge the effectiveness of a course
Learning Outcomes
•A specific statement that outlines the overall purpose or goal from participation in an educational activity.
•These statements often start by using a stem phrase—a starter statement at the beginning of each learning outcome—such as “students will be able to.” This is then followed by an action verb that denotes the level of learning expected, such as understand, analyze or evaluate.
• The final part is to write is the application of that verb in context and describe the desired performance level, such as “write a report” or “provide three peers with feedback.” An example of a well-structured outcome statement is: “Students will be able to locate, apply and cite effective secondary sources in their essays.”
•These statements written at a class level help students have a clear picture of where the course is taking them and what is expected of them in order to be successful in the course. These statements also help educators guide the design of courses through the selection of content, teaching strategies, and technologies so that course components are aligned to specific outcomes.
S.M.A.R.T
What are SMART goals in education?
•SMART goals are becoming more frequent in schools, and they help students and teachers set a clear plan to achieve goals. Rather than setting generic targets like getting better at Math, students and teachers can be more specific about the
This document discusses assessment in curriculum design. It outlines various types of assessment including placement assessment, observation of learning, short-term and long-term achievement assessment, diagnostic assessment, and proficiency assessment. It also discusses approaches to assessment including validity, reliability, and practicality. Validity refers to a test measuring what it is supposed to measure. Reliability means a test produces consistent results. Practicality refers to a test being feasible to administer within constraints like time and resources.
This document provides an overview of key concepts and issues related to language assessment. It begins by defining common terms like assessment, testing, measurement and evaluation. It then describes different types of assessment including formal/informal and formative/summative. Issues discussed include discrete-point vs integrative testing and traditional vs alternative assessments. Current topics like computer-based testing and views of intelligence are also covered. The document aims to outline the concepts, methods and debates within the field of language assessment.
Language testing and evaluation validity and reliability.Vadher Ankita
This document discusses validity and reliability in language testing. It defines different types of validity including content validity, construct validity, criterion validity (concurrent and predictive validity), and face validity. It also explains how to judge the validity of a test and ensures it measures what it intends to measure. The document also defines different types of reliability such as equivalency, stability, internal, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability. It provides examples of how each type is measured to ensure consistency in testing.
This document discusses different types of language tests and their properties. It describes proficiency tests which measure overall language ability regardless of training, and achievement tests which assess specific taught elements. It also covers diagnostic tests which identify strengths/weaknesses, placement tests which determine appropriate learning levels, and direct versus indirect testing. The document also discusses test reliability, validity, common objective task types like multiple choice, and how tests can positively or negatively impact language teaching through washback effects.
The document discusses the development of objective assessment tools. It begins by outlining the intended learning outcomes, which are to define concepts related to objective tests, develop valid and reliable objective tests, and evaluate objective tests. It then discusses the rationale for assessment, including improving student learning and teaching. The types of objective tests are defined, including selection and supply types. The steps in planning an objective test are outlined, including identifying test objectives, deciding on the test type, and preparing a table of specifications. Characteristics of good tests like validity and reliability are also discussed.
This document summarizes four types of language tests: proficiency tests, achievement tests, diagnostic tests, and placement tests. It provides details about each type of test, including their purposes, content, advantages, and disadvantages. Proficiency tests measure overall language ability regardless of training, while achievement tests measure success in achieving course objectives. Diagnostic tests identify strengths and weaknesses, and placement tests are used to assign students to appropriate class levels. The document also discusses additional topics in language testing such as direct vs indirect testing, and objective vs subjective scoring.
The document discusses various techniques for testing English grammar, including:
1. Gap filling items that test specific grammatical structures by having students complete sentences.
2. Cloze tests that are prose passages with words deleted for students to supply based on context.
3. Multiple choice grammar questions that test structures through sentence completion.
It provides examples and guidance on preparing different grammar test items, ensuring clear instructions, using appropriate contexts, and avoiding distractors that confuse students. The goal is to effectively test mastery of specific grammatical concepts.
The document discusses various topics related to testing, assessing, and teaching including the differences between tests, assessments, teaching, evaluation, formative and summative assessments, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests, discrete-point and integrative testing, communicative language testing, performance-based assessment, and computer-based testing. Key points made include that assessment is an integral part of the teaching-learning cycle, both informal and formal assessments have roles to play, and tests when used appropriately can provide motivation and feedback to learners.
This document discusses different types of language tests and testing, including proficiency tests, achievement tests, diagnostic tests, placement tests, direct and indirect testing, discrete point and integrative testing, norm-referenced and criterion-referenced testing, objective and subjective testing, and computer adaptive testing. It provides details on the purpose and characteristics of each type of test.
Language testing involves developing and administering tests to evaluate an individual's proficiency in a language, including their knowledge, ability to discriminate, and different types of skills like achievement, proficiency, and aptitude. Tests are used to determine what a student has learned according to content standards and policies, and performance standards evaluate skills like reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Language evaluation also gauges student growth and development against learning objectives.
In this PowerPoint presentation you can find a summary of the ideas presented in the Chapter 12 of Testing for Language Teachers by Arthur Hughes. This chapter is devoted to different key aspects about testing listening. These ideas are also combined at the end of the presentation with other supplementary ideas from the British Council and a PPT created by Kia Karavas.
Testing writing (for Language Teachers)Wenlie Jean
The document discusses the key considerations for properly testing writing ability. It identifies four main problems in testing: 1) using representative tasks, 2) eliciting valid writing samples, 3) ensuring scores are valid and reliable, and 4) providing feedback. For each, it outlines various factors that test designers should take into account such as specifying all content domains, including a representative task sample, restricting candidates, using appropriate scoring scales, and calibrating scorers. The goal is to develop writing tests that accurately measure students' abilities.
The document outlines 9 stages of test construction: 1) Planning, 2) Preparing items, 3) Establishing validity, 4) Reliability, 5) Arranging items, 6) Writing directions, 7) Analyzing and revising, 8) Reproducing, and 9) Administering and scoring. It discusses key considerations at each stage such as writing items according to specifications, establishing content and criterion validity, determining reliability through various methods, and ensuring the test is objective, comprehensive, simple, and practical. The final stages cover arranging items by difficulty, providing clear directions, analyzing item performance, and properly administering the test.
Needs analysis in syllabus design.pptxAREEJ ALDAEJ
The document discusses needs analysis for syllabus design in teaching English. It defines needs analysis and syllabus design, outlines the history and purposes of needs analysis, and classifications of needs. The document also describes steps for designing a syllabus based on needs analysis, provides an example research study on needs analysis conducted in Albania, and discusses the role of teachers in needs analysis.
This document discusses course planning and syllabus design. It begins by outlining topics that will be covered, including developing a course rationale, preparing a scope and sequence plan, and planning course content and structure. It then provides details on developing a course rationale by answering questions about who the course is for and what will be taught. Examples of course rationales are given. The document also discusses choosing course content, describing student entry and exit levels, and various approaches to syllabus design, including grammatical, lexical, functional, situational, and integrated syllabuses. Factors to consider in selecting a syllabus framework and developing instructional blocks are also outlined.
This document summarizes key aspects of curriculum design approaches from chapters 9 and 10 of the book "Language Curriculum Design" by I.S.P Nation and John Macalister. It discusses three common approaches to the curriculum design process: the waterfall model, focused opportunistic approach, and layers of necessity model. It also covers negotiated syllabuses, where teachers work with learners to make joint decisions about curriculum design elements. Requirements for implementing a negotiated syllabus include establishing negotiation procedures, planning course content and activities, setting learning goals, and evaluating outcomes.
Developments in English For Specific Purposes A multidisciplinary Approach ch...farhadmax69
This document discusses parameters for course design, including whether the course should be intensive or extensive, assessed or non-assessed, focused on immediate or delayed needs, and other factors. It provides definitions and considerations for different course design approaches. The document also outlines steps for developing a course outline, including ordering target events and skills, selecting materials, developing a timetable, and planning for assessment and evaluation. The overall aim is to provide guidance for taking an integrated approach to course design based on learner needs and context.
This document provides guidance on effective test design for language assessments. It discusses key considerations for tests including usefulness, validity, reliability, practicality, washback, authenticity and transparency. It also covers determining learning objectives, aligning assessments and instruction, and different types of test items for evaluating listening, reading, grammar, vocabulary and language functions. The document stresses the importance of ensuring tests are well-aligned with classroom instruction and reflect authentic language use. It also addresses controversial issues in language testing.
The document discusses various techniques for evaluating educational curriculum and programs. It describes evaluation as collecting data to determine the value of a program and whether it should be adopted, rejected, or revised. Several data collection techniques are examined, including observation, interviews, questionnaires, tests, and assessments. Tests are categorized based on their purpose, format, and standards. The document emphasizes that using the right technique for a given evaluation is important to obtain accurate information and make better decisions.
Language testing is the practice of evaluating an individual's proficiency in using a particular language. There are two main types of assessment: formative assessment which checks student progress, and summative assessment which measures achievement at the end of a term. There are five common types of language tests: proficiency tests which measure overall ability, achievement tests related to course content, diagnostic tests which identify strengths and weaknesses, placement tests for assigning students to class levels, and direct/indirect tests. The effect of testing on teaching is known as backwash, which can be harmful if not aligned with course objectives, or beneficial if tests influence instructional changes.
ggfgggvfghghhhhh Competencies
-A general statement that describes the use of desired knowledge, skills, behaviors and abilities. Competencies often define specific applied skills and knowledge that enables people to successfully perform specific functions in a work or educational setting. Some examples include:
Functional competencies
Skills that are required to use on a daily or regular basis, such as cognitive, methodological, technological and linguistic abilities
Interpersonal competencies
Oral, written and visual communication skills, as well as the ability to work effectively with diverse teams
Critical thinking competencies
The ability to reason effectively, use systems thinking and make judgments and decisions toward solving complex problems
•A key differentiator between learning competencies, objectives and outcomes is that learning objectives are the specific abilities necessary to accomplish the learning competency.
Learning Objectives
•A statement that describes what a faculty member will cover in a course and what a course will have provided students. They are generally broader than student learning outcomes. For example, “By the end of the course, students will use change theory to develop family-centered care within the context of nursing practice.” Statements like this help determine what the student learned and what the teacher taught.
•Overall, learning objectives determine what the course will have provided to the student. Both learning outcomes and learning objectives are used to gauge the effectiveness of a course
Learning Outcomes
•A specific statement that outlines the overall purpose or goal from participation in an educational activity.
•These statements often start by using a stem phrase—a starter statement at the beginning of each learning outcome—such as “students will be able to.” This is then followed by an action verb that denotes the level of learning expected, such as understand, analyze or evaluate.
• The final part is to write is the application of that verb in context and describe the desired performance level, such as “write a report” or “provide three peers with feedback.” An example of a well-structured outcome statement is: “Students will be able to locate, apply and cite effective secondary sources in their essays.”
•These statements written at a class level help students have a clear picture of where the course is taking them and what is expected of them in order to be successful in the course. These statements also help educators guide the design of courses through the selection of content, teaching strategies, and technologies so that course components are aligned to specific outcomes.
S.M.A.R.T
What are SMART goals in education?
•SMART goals are becoming more frequent in schools, and they help students and teachers set a clear plan to achieve goals. Rather than setting generic targets like getting better at Math, students and teachers can be more specific about the
This document discusses assessment in curriculum design. It outlines various types of assessment including placement assessment, observation of learning, short-term and long-term achievement assessment, diagnostic assessment, and proficiency assessment. It also discusses approaches to assessment including validity, reliability, and practicality. Validity refers to a test measuring what it is supposed to measure. Reliability means a test produces consistent results. Practicality refers to a test being feasible to administer within constraints like time and resources.
This PowerPoint by Dr. Dee McKinney & Katie Shepard was presented as a workshop for the East Georgia State College Center for Teaching & Learning for interested faculty & staff in January 2018.
The document outlines the stages of test construction including determining test aspects, planning content and format, writing test items, preparing items, reviewing items, pre-testing, validating items, and providing guidelines for constructing test items. It discusses determining test purpose and scope, sampling content representative of the course material, avoiding test-wiseness, reviewing items after sufficient time, analyzing pre-test results, and ensuring a range of difficulty levels and skills are assessed.
The document discusses question bank preparation, defining it as an organized collection of test items. It outlines the need for a question bank, characteristics of an effective bank, types of questions that can be included, and steps for developing, validating, and utilizing a question bank. Key benefits are providing ready-made test items and minimizing examination weaknesses. Limitations include the extensive work required to develop and analyze items for the bank.
- Students will develop observational drawing skills through creating a self-portrait focused on analyzing facial features and proportions.
- The teacher will model drawing techniques step-by-step using a tablet and students will practice drawing their own portraits, applying what they learned about proportions.
- Students' self-portraits will be assessed using a rubric to evaluate their understanding of proportions and observational drawing skills. Accommodations will be provided for students with IEPs, 504 plans, or who are English learners.
MEU WORKSHOP Evaluation principles and objectivesDevan Pannen
The document discusses principles and objectives of evaluation in teaching and learning. It describes the purpose of evaluation as ensuring students can do their jobs competently and to provide feedback to improve learning. Formative and summative evaluations are described, with formative helping teachers understand student progress and summative being end-of-term evaluations. Student evaluation involves measuring achievement through tools like exams, while assessment considers subjective attributes. Evaluation involves making judgements based on measurement and assessment data. The roles of evaluation include feedback, prediction, selection, grading, and program evaluation.
This document discusses key considerations for designing classroom language tests. It begins by outlining critical questions to guide the design process, including the purpose and objectives of the test. It emphasizes that test tasks and specifications should logically reflect the purpose and objectives. The document then discusses selecting and arranging test tasks, as well as scoring, grading and providing feedback. It also outlines different types of language tests and practical steps for test construction, including assessing clear objectives, drawing up specifications, devising tasks, and designing multiple choice items to measure specific objectives clearly.
This document provides best practices for teaching online courses. It covers course planning, design, and delivery. For planning, it discusses initial planning phases and student communication. For design, it discusses accessibility, simplicity, consistency, and quality assurance models. It also covers learning objectives, syllabus development, rubrics, and discussion boards. For delivery, it discusses flipped classrooms, assessments, and providing feedback. Examples are given for structuring hybrid courses using a blended approach.
136664995 ele3104-–-english-language-teaching-methodology-for-young-learnersAzhar Muhammad
The document provides information on lesson planning and assessment for teaching English to young learners. It discusses identifying the target group of pupils and integrating language skills in lesson planning. Principles of language testing and evaluation are outlined, including the purposes of assessment and characteristics of valid and reliable tests. Formative and summative assessment are compared, and formal and informal evaluation approaches are contrasted. Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced evaluation are also differentiated. Guidelines are provided on test construction and using assessment results to guide instruction.
This document discusses lesson planning for teaching English as a second language. It provides guidance on determining objectives, presenting new material, practicing language skills, and assessing learning. The key aspects covered include setting clear and measurable objectives, activating prior knowledge, sequencing controlled and communicative activities, continuously monitoring understanding, and managing time effectively. Sample lesson plans are reviewed to demonstrate these best practices.
This includes the process how you can construct a test for academic achievement of the students. Characteristics, principles, types, steps all are discussed here. Calculation of weightage and difficulty level and also making of blue print is also included.
The document discusses diagnostic testing and achievement testing. It defines diagnostic testing as identifying specific learning deficiencies in individuals to address weaknesses. It provides characteristics of good diagnostic tests, including assessing each learning point with multiple items. The document also discusses constructing and administering diagnostic tests, and their uses in guiding instruction and aiding students. Achievement tests measure overall learning, but have some diagnostic value. The key difference is achievement tests sample content broadly while diagnostic tests exhaustively assess each learning point.
The document provides guidance on planning a written test by setting objectives and developing a table of specifications (TOS). It discusses the importance of setting clear instructional objectives and designing a TOS to ensure the test adequately measures the intended outcomes. The TOS should map objectives to content areas, cognitive levels, item formats, and weights. It then provides steps for creating a TOS, including determining objectives, topic coverage, weights, item numbers, and formats like one-way, two-way, and three-way tables. Sample test questions and exercises are included to help understand applying the concepts when developing assessments.
Training Design, Delivery and Evaluation - Training of trainers - LeadFarm Pr...SCDF-AN
This document provides guidance on designing, delivering, and evaluating training courses. It discusses how to plan the design and structure of a training session, including determining learning objectives, content, and structure. It also covers evaluating learner progress against objectives, gathering feedback, and identifying opportunities for improvement. Key aspects of training covered include instructional design questions to consider, using visual aids, different delivery methods, and models for evaluating training at various levels, from reactions to learning to transfer of skills and business impact. The overall purpose is to help training professionals plan effective training sessions and systematically evaluate outcomes.
Professor Michele Pistone, Villanova University, shares her insights on assessment for legal education, including formative and summative assessment. She explains the difference between formative and summative assessments and the components of effective assessment tools. For more information about online learning, visit, Legaledweb.com and You tube/ LegalED.
It is a type of assessment given at the beginning of the instruction. It aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the students regarding the topic to be discussed.
A diagnostic test is a test designed to locate specific learning deficiencies in case of specific individuals at a specific stage of a learning lesson, so that specific effort could be made to overcome those deficiencies.
Testing and Assessment -PRESENTATION OFFICAL.pptxPhngNguynThMinh3
This document summarizes a presentation about classroom assessment techniques and applications. It begins with definitions of assessment and different types of assessment, including formative, summative, informal, formal, and performance-based assessment. It also discusses types of tests such as diagnostic, placement, achievement, aptitude, and proficiency tests. Additional assessment techniques like portfolios, journals, conferences, and self-assessment are covered. Principles of language assessment including practicality, reliability, validity, authenticity, and washback are also defined. The document concludes with the steps to test construction, including setting clear objectives, developing test specifications, drafting and revising tests, piloting tests, and utilizing feedback.
Similar to Test Design Construction and Adminstration (20)
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Test Design Construction and Adminstration
1. Test Design, Construction
and administration
Trainee: Supervised by:
■ NESSI El Houcine ■ Mr. Ayad CHRAA
Training year: 2020-2021
Department of English
Module: Testing & Assessment
Centre Regional des Metiers
d’Education et de Formation
CRMEF . Inzegane, Morocco
2. Outline: 7 stages
I. Identifying the precise testing need
II. Writing Test Specifications
III.Test construction
IV.Test administration
V. Test Scoring / marking
VI.Test evaluation
3. I. Identifying the precise testing need
• why am I testing? which specify the test type/
purpose, abilities to be tested
example:
am I testing for: to identify areas of weaknesses and
strengths to elicit information about what SS need to
work on in the future.
Diagnostic Test
4. • am I testing for: to analyze the extent to which
students have acquired language features that have
already been taught.
• am I testing for: to measure student’s overall ability
in the target language . the content of the Test is not
based on the Objective or Content of a particular
language course.
• ‘’ gate-keeping’’ role
Achievement Test
Proficiency Test
5. • am I testing for: to place a students in a teaching
programme based on their abilities. it relate to
general ability not a specific area of learning.
Placement Test
6. why am I testing?
• to specify the test type/ purpose, abilities to be
tested
7. Identify the objectives
• know what you want to test
• list everything student need to know or able to do
• objective: can be
• a list of grammatical structures and communication
skills in the unit that you have taught.
8. II. Writing Test Specifications
• A) Content:
• language: ( structure, lexical areas, discourse features)
e.g Relative pronoun. Conditional Type 0 and 1
• functions: possibility. apology . interest
• Skills: e.g reading for gist
• Topics: e.g celebrations.
9. • B) Format : overall structure of a test
• item. is the basic unit of interaction on a test. What
we often call a test question.
• activity selection
• weighing of components: the relative importance
assigned to each objective
10. item type and tasks:
• mode of eliciting responses( prompting):
• Oral: student listen
• Written : student read
• responding on test :
• Oral
• Written
12. this specification give indication of :
• the topics ( objectives) you will cover.
• the implied elicitation and response formats for items.
• the number of items in each section.
• the time allocated for each
13. • C) Timing : overall time for the Test and timing for
each section
• e.g A) overall : 35 min
• B) section :
• Speaking: 5 min
• listening 10 min
• reading 10 min
• writing 10 min
14. • D) Scoring procedure :
Scoring plan: reflect the relative weight that you place on each
section and item in each section
15. III. Test construction
• A) Sampling for potential content :
• select form the ‘’content specification’’ a sampling that represent the
lessons taught. achieve
• ‘’content validity’’ & ‘’ backwash’’ : need to choose widely from whole
area of content.
• B) Item Writing & moderation:
• when writing items we need to keep in mind that some items need to
be deleted, change. improved through team work .
18. • give notice of the exam a week before or more for students
to prepare.
• give test details : when ? where? how long?
• give students the lessons will be tested on.
• give students advice on : start with easy one for you
• do a review of lessons that will be tested.
19.
20. • administer the test my self because :
• I can remind students with the content, format, and the
marking system before given students the papers.
• explain the test instructions and emphasize important words to
help students.
• during the test I can help students who face difficulty with
instructions.
21.
22. • marking a test takes a week.
• correct the exam with students.
• give students advice to go back and revise their
lessons.
• evaluate my teaching through analyzing students
errors. to see if a mistake is common on a particular
lesson.
23. V. Test Scoring / marking
Scoring plan: reflect the relative weight that you place on each
section and item in each section
how do you assign scoring to various components of a test?
depends on the objectives
24. VI. Test evaluation
• Is there sufficient context?
• Does the item test what it is supposed to test (as
specified)?
• Is the task clear? Could a student capable of
performing the task misunderstand it?
25. • Is the item uneconomical (too much space/time for too
little information)?
• . Is there more than one correct response. Is this
acceptable?
• will scoring be reliable?
26. references
• Marion, W. & Tony, W. (2009)A Course in English language teaching: Practice and
theory. Penny Ur
• Douglas, H. B. language Assessment Principles and classroom practice. Longman.
• Arthur, H. Testing for English language Teachers (1992). Cambridge University
Press.