The document summarizes research on teaching grammar deductively versus inductively. It describes a study that compared teaching 10 French grammar points deductively by explaining rules first versus inductively by exposing students to example sentences first without explanation. Students performed better on immediate and delayed tests of the grammar points when they were taught inductively, discovering the rules through meaningful examples and communication rather than being directly taught the rules. The document concludes with criteria for effective inductive grammar lessons, noting students can communicate using new structures before being taught the linguistic rules.

1. Teaching Grammar in the Language Classroom Foundations Seminar in Foreign Language Teaching September 15, 2003

2. Plan Deductive vs. Inductive Grammar Instruction Research results What are the benefits of a guided induction approach? Description of PACE Teaching videos and analysis PACE activity Lesson Planning Ideas Peer-teaching Grammar/ Class Observation Reports

3. “ In the past, a traditional classroom, with its emphasis on grammatical competence and explicit knowledge of language rules, did not provide occasions for learners to communicate…” - Adair-Hauck & Donato, 2002

4. “ Unfortunately, many students who spent years learning only the formal properties of the language (sound system, verb conjugations, rules of syntax, vocabulary lists) could not, in the end, exchange information, express ideas or feelings, construct and control problem solving, or develop and nurture a social relationship in a second language.” -Adair-Hauck & Donato, 2002

5. Importance of Communicative Competence It is through communication that we are able to improve our world, to prosper, and to enjoy it. - Cooper (1993) Communicative competence stresses the need to know how, when, and why to say what to whom. -Standards of FL Learning, 1996

6. How do we focus on form within a communicative framework? Teachers don’t need to dichotomize language use– pitting form against meaning or meaning against form (Johnson, 1992) Attention to form is beneficial to language users and critical to improving students’ language proficiency

7. Deductive vs. Inductive Deductive : Students learn grammar rule  Use Rule Inductive: Use grammar rule  Learn Rule

8. When grammar is taught deductively , the teacher… Explains the rule to the learners Provides NO CONTEXT or COMMUNICATIVE PURPOSE for the grammar Focuses on form first and then meaning Drills students to learn the rule mechanically Assumes all responsibility for student learning

9. When grammar is taught inductively , the teacher… Allows the learner to formulate and discover the rule (“to induct”) Provides a CONTEXT and PURPOSE for use Focuses on meaning first and form second Helps learners discover the rule through meaningful communication Empowers the students to problem solve and learn how to learn a language Source: Donato, 2002

10. Research: Effectiveness of a Guided Induction Approach Subjects : 26 students enrolled in French 101 at Emory French in Action video audio program Within-Subjects Design Target structures: 1. Au 2. Des- indefinite article 3. Pouvoir + infinitive 4. Ne (verb) pas DE 5. Comparative 6. Du/ De la/ De l’ 7. Jouer à 8. Direct object pronouns 9. Imperative 10.Lequel/laquelle/ etc. Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring Grammatical Structures by Guided Induction. The French Review, 65 (5), 708- 718.

11. Research Teaching Procedure: Deductive Approach 1. Teacher points to a model sentence that exemplified the rule and then provides grammar explanation Model sentence : “Dans un avion, on peut parler à un ami; on ne peut pas regarder un match de football.” Oral rule statement: “En français, utilisez l’infinitif après le verbe pouvoir”

12. Deductive Approach (cont.) 2. Teacher practices this rule with the students with a 10 item oral drill Instructions: Cet exercise s’appelle Dans un avion. R épondez affirmativement ou négativement à ma question. TEACHER: (picture of people drinking) Dans un avion, peut-on boire? STUDENTS: Oui, on peut boire TEACHER: (picture of people dancing) Peut-on parler à un ami ? STUDENTS: Oui, on peut parler à un ami . TEACHER: Peut-on faire du jogging? STUDETNS: Non, on ne peut pas faire du jogging.

13. Research Teaching Procedure: Guided Induction Approach Teacher begins with introducing exercise “ Dans un avion” and lead students in the previous drill Instructions: Cet exercise s’appelle Dans un avion. R épondez affirmativement ou négativement à ma question. TEACHER: (picture of people drinking) Dans un avion, peut-on boire? STUDENTS: Oui, on peut boire TEACHER: (picture of people dancing) Peut-on parler à un ami ? STUDENTS: Oui, on peut parler à un ami . TEACHER: Peut-on faire du jogging? STUDETNS: Non, on ne peut pas faire du jogging.

14. Guided Induction (cont.) 2. Directs students’ attention to the model sentences on the board and asks the class to fill them in chorally as a group. Instructions: Maintenant, r épondez avec imagination TEACHER: Dans un avion, on peut ____________ à un ami; on ne peut pas ________ un match de football. STUDENTS: Parler/ Regarder 3. Teacher wrote in students’ choral response as they gave it and the teacher and students co-constructed the rule

15. Test I (One day after grammar lesson)

16. Test II (one week after grammar lesson)

17. Overall Research Results Statistically significant at the p<.05 level

18. Criteria for Effective Inductive Lessons 1. A clear and interesting CONTEXT 2. A purpose for the grammar in communication 3. Shows the grammar pattern clearly, frequently, and naturally in context 4. Keeps meaning and communication in focus (not just form) 5. Lesson moves from comprehension to production 6. Requires learner to communicate using the new grammar

19. In an inductive approach… Students will talk and use sentences with the new structures without having been taught the linguistic rules ! How is this possible???? Why is this a good thing???