Tb in kaart eng
This document discusses mapping the curriculum for Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences. It notes the need to review and improve the curriculum due to accreditation and a desire to better capture quality and manage changes. Previously, curriculum information was stored in documents, spreadsheets and websites, making it difficult to manage and answer questions. The document proposes developing a new curriculum model using Mendix software. This would make the curriculum information more professional, thorough, maintainable and easy to customize while stored securely in the cloud. Initial core data has been loaded into the new model, and it allows forms, business rules and authorizations to be constructed. Some issues still need resolution, such as fully defining educational principles, architecture and quality criteria.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (14)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (16)
Similar to Tb in kaart eng
Similar to Tb in kaart eng (20)
More from Arthur van der Molen
More from Arthur van der Molen (15)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Tb in kaart eng
- 1. TK! Mapping a curriculum Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences Arthur van der Molen – March 2016 7-3-2016 AvdM 1
- 3. Occasion for change… Review of curriculum Accreditation 2016 Professionalizing education development Need to capture quality of execution Need to manage change program Managing improvement cycles 7-3-2016 AvdM 3
- 4. Curriculum design Course design Design principles Course Vision Excecution Feedback Process...
- 6. The issues • In which course we work on competency x. y? • When is course exam reviewed ? • how many hours contact time we have in second year? • What books /readers do we use in which course? • BoKs element A, in which course is it in use? • Are we using X model? • What are the learning objectives in semester 3? • What about the quality of a course? • And a lot more questions .... 7-3-2016 AvdM 6
- 7. Challenges in renewal and improvement process • Unclear roles, tasks and results • Informal process… • difficult to manage • Slow process (annual cycle) • Manual / error-prone 7-3-2016 AvdM 7
- 8. All information was (is) contained in • MS Word documents • MS Excel spreadsheets • Websites • Grading system • And more… 7-3-2016 AvdM 8
- 9. The Idea… This can be done Better, more professional, and above all more thoroughly? 7-3-2016 AvdM 9
- 10. 7-3-2016 AvdM 10
- 11. •Model is the software •Agile and Interactive •Software deplayed into the Cloud •Secure and professional •Easy customizable •Maintainable We use Mendix PAAS 7-3-2016 AvdM 11
- 12. Construction of the model • Domain model • Forms • business rules and logic • Controls • Authorizations 7-3-2016 AvdM 12
- 13. 7-3-2016 AvdM 13 Domain model
- 14. Lots of info 7-3-2016 AvdM 14
- 17. Core data (March 2016) • 68 courses • 599 learning objectives • 261 issues/comments • 107 books (literature) • 454 BoKs elements • 37 teachers teaching 7-3-2016 AvdM 17
- 18. Errors found 7-3-2016 AvdM 18
- 20. Issues not yet solved • A real quality culture…. • What are our educational principles? • What is the architecture of our curriculum? • When is something "good", what criteria? • Learning objectives, what detail? • Competences • Domain BoKs • Definition of terms • same name but different meaning and purpose • Teachers don’t always agree 7-3-2016 AvdM 20
- 21. 7-3-2016 AvdM 21