Understanding teachers and school leaders as “professionals” means having high expectations of them as advanced knowledge workers. It means they should not only conduct their work in an effective manner, but also strive to improve their skills throughout their career, collaborate with colleagues and parents to work towards school improvement,and think creatively about the challenges they face. However, if we expect teachers and schools leaders to act as professionals, we should treat them as such. This report aims to provide an in-depth analysis of teachers’ and school leaders’ perceptions of the value of their profession, their work-related well-being and stress, and their satisfaction with their working conditions. It also offers a description of teachers’ and school leaders’ contractual arrangements, opportunities to engage in professional tasks such as collaborative teamwork, autonomous decision making, and leadership practices.Based on the voice of teachers and school leaders, the report offers a series of policy recommendations to help strengthen the professionalisation of teaching careers.The OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) is the largest international survey asking teachers and school leaders about their working conditions and learning environments, and provides a barometer of the profession every five years. Results from the 2018 cycle explore and examine the various dimensions of teacher and school leader professionalism across education systems.
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
TALIS 2018 Pre-Launch Webinar - New insights on teaching and learning - What to expect from TALIS 2018
1. TALIS 2018 PRE-LAUNCH WEBINAR
- WHAT TO EXPECT FROM TALIS 2018 VOLUME II:
TEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADERS AS VALUED
PROFESSIONALS
11 March 2020
Pablo Fraser
OECD Analyst
Directorate for Education and Skills
3. Building on a now-famous motto…
“The quality of an education system cannot exceed
the quality of its teachers and principals”…
…but the quality of teachers and principals cannot
exceed the quality of their training, their practices,
their opportunities to collaborate and develop
further, and their learning environments.
4. TALIS was designed to support the
professionalism of the teaching workforce
• What does it mean to recognise our teachers and school leaders as professionals?
– Using their expertise and training to make decisions about their work
– Having autonomy to act on those decisions
– Contributing to the body of professional knowledge
– Such decisions and actions are grounded in a specialised set of knowledge and skills, stemming from both quality initial and
continuous training, and from constant collaboration with peers
• Teaching in today’s world requires a new, uniquely modern kind of professionalism, as teachers and school
leaders are expected to perform new tasks
– Responding to students’ individual learning needs
– Nurturing the development of students’ social and emotional skills
– Adapting to the technological and digital demands of our economies and societies
– Using information and communication technologies in the classroom and for collaboration with other teachers
– Collecting and analysing data about the school and classroom, and acting upon it
• This second volume of TALIS, Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals, aims to
– Give a sense of how schools can foster productive and engaging working environments where peer learning thrives and
teachers are at the centre of discussions on what is best for teaching
– It also sheds light on teachers’ and school leaders’ working conditions, along with their reported satisfaction levels and
work-related well-being
5. The imperative of enhancing professionalism
throughout the teacher career pathway
to empower teachers as agents of change
6. The imperative of enhancing professionalism
throughout the teacher career pathway
to empower teachers as agents of change
7. TALIS overview
TALIS is the first international survey examining teaching and
learning environments in schools. It asks teachers and school
leaders about their work, their schools and their classrooms
with 48 education systems covered
TALIS options:
Some countries also survey
their primary and upper secondary
teachers as well as conduct
TALIS in PISA schools
3 surveys to date:
2008 with 24 education systems covered
2013 with 34 education systems covered + 4 in 2014
2018 3rd cycle of TALIS with 48 education systems from all
continents covered
8. TALIS is developed in partnership
2 surveys to date:
2008 with 24 education systems covered
2013 with 34 education systems covered + 4 in 2014
3rd round of TALIS with 48 education systems covered
TALIS
Is a partnership
between
48 Educational
systems
Educational
systems
European
Commission
Teachers’ Unions
International
research consortium
9. Scope of TALIS 2018
TALIS 2008
About 70,000
teachers in
4,500 schools
TALIS 2013
About
150,000
teachers in
9,500
schools
Number of
participants
2008 2013 2018
ISCED 2 24 34 (+4) 48
ISCED 1 - 6 15
ISCED 3 - 10(+1) 11
TALIS-PISA link - 8 9
TALIS 2018
About 260,000 teachers
in 15,000 schools
representing more than
8 millions teachers
across 48 countries
10. TALIS-participating countries and
economies
*Note: TALIS only runs in a sub-national entity of the following countries: Argentina (Buenos
Aires), Canada (Alberta), China (Shanghai) and the United Kingdom (England) .
This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty
over any territory covered by this map.
TALIS 2008 and 2013-14
TALIS 2018 new systems
12. TALIS 2018 content - 11 themes
1. Initial training
2. Professional development
3. Teaching practices
4. Professional practices
5. Feedback and appraisal
6. Job satisfaction
7. Human resources issues
8. Leadership
9. Classroom /school climate
10. Innovation
11. Equity and diversity
Cross-cutting themes
13. TALIS 2018 new content in a nutshell
• 2 new thematic areas to remain policy relevant
– Innovation capacity (organisation and team innovativeness)
– Teaching in diverse environments in terms of social & cultural composition of
the student body (equity and diversity beliefs and practices, self-efficacy in
multicultural classrooms and environments)
• New content to expand existing themes
– Commitment to teaching profession (motivation to join profession, teacher
attrition and turnover, principals’ and teachers’ career plans/attrition)
– Satisfaction with level of autonomy in target class
– Stress and well-being (workplace well-being and stress, sources of stress)
– Policy influence (perception of value and policy influence, teachers’ spending
priorities)
14. Teacher professionalism as the overarching
framework for TALIS 2018
Professionalism
Knowledge
and skills
base
Career
opportunities
Peer
regulation
and
collaborative
culture
Responsibility
and autonomy
Prestige and
standing
To equip students with the skills needed for the 21st Century, education
systems need high-level professional knowledge workers in education
15. TALIS 2018 Results
Volume I
Teachers and School Leaders
as Lifelong Learners
Pillar addressed:
Knowledge and skills
Volume II
Teachers and School Leaders
as Valued Professionals
Pillars addressed:
Career opportunities,
professional responsibility
and autonomy, collaborative
communities and prestige
19 June 2019 23 March 2020
19. Fig I.4.1 - Motivations to become a teacher
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Teaching allowed me to influence the development of children
and young people
Teaching allowed me to provide a contribution to society
Teaching allowed me to benefit the socially disadvantaged
Teaching was a secure job
Teaching provided a reliable income
The teaching schedule fit with responsibilities in my personal
life
Teaching offered a steady career path
Percentage of teachers who report that the following elements were of "moderate" or "high"
importance in becoming a teacher (OECD average-31)
%
21. Fig I.4.4 - Teaching as a first career
choice
0
20
40
60
80
100
VietNam
Georgia
Shanghai(China)
Portugal
SaudiArabia
Slovenia
Japan
Korea
Lithuania
Hungary
UnitedArabEmirates
Kazakhstan
Romania
Latvia
Flemish(Belgium)
Russia
Bulgaria
Singapore
Malta
France
Belgium
CzechRepublic
Alberta(Canada)
Colombia
Croatia
OECDaverage-31
Chile
Austria
Brazil
Italy
Turkey
Estonia
SlovakRepublic
Iceland
Denmark
Spain
Israel
Norway
Mexico
Finland
Sweden
UnitedStates
England(UK)
Australia
NewZealand
Netherlands
CABA(Argentina)
SouthAfrica
Female teachers Male teachers
Percentage of teachers for whom teaching was their first choice as a career, by teacher
characteristics
%
22. Fig I.3.1 - Teachers’ age
32
36
40
44
48
52
0
20
40
60
80
100
Georgia
Lithuania
Estonia
Bulgaria
Portugal
Italy
Latvia
Hungary
Russia
Iceland
Slovenia
Sweden
Spain
CzechRepublic
Austria
Finland
Denmark
SlovakRepublic
NewZealand
Colombia
OECDaverage-31
CABA(Argentina)
Norway
Korea
UnitedStates
Romania
France
Netherlands
SouthAfrica
Israel
Croatia
Australia
Japan
Brazil
Mexico
Kazakhstan
Chile
Alberta(Canada)
Belgium
England(UK)
Flemish(Belgium)
VietNam
Shanghai(China)
UnitedArabEmirates
SaudiArabia
Singapore
Malta
Turkey
Under age 30 Age 30 to 49 Age 50 and above% AgeAverage age
23. 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Percentageoffemaleprincipals
Percentage of female teachers
Fig I.3.5- Gender balance among teachers and
principals
Below the OECD average
Above the OECD average
Equal feminisation of the teacher
and the principal workforce
Turkey
Latvia
Saudi Arabia
Sweden
Brazil
Korea
Japan
25. Fig I.3.12 - School safety
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Intimidation or
bullying among
students
A student or
parent/guardian
reports unwanted
electronic contact
among students
Intimidation or
verbal abuse of
teachers or staff
Vandalism and
theft
A student or
parent/guardian
reports postings of
hurtful information
on the Internet
about students
Physical injury
caused by violence
among students
Use/possession of
drugs and/or
alcohol
OECD average-30
Percentage of principals reporting that the following incidents occurred at least weekly in
their school
%
26. Fig I.3.13/B - Change in school safety from
2013 to 2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
NewZealand
Flemish(Belgium)
Finland
England(UK)
Brazil
Sweden
France
Israel
Bulgaria
Mexico
Norway
Alberta(Canada)
Netherlands
Romania
Estonia
Latvia
SlovakRepublic
Portugal
Spain
Singapore
Denmark
Croatia
Chile
Italy
Iceland
CzechRepublic
Georgia
Japan
Korea
Shanghai(China)
2018 2013
Percentage of principals reporting that “physical and non-physical forms of bullying
among students” occurred at least weekly in their school%
27. Fig I.3.9 - School practices related to equity
0
20
40
60
80
100
Teaching students to be
inclusive of different socio-
economic backgrounds
Additional support for
students from disadvantaged
backgrounds
Explicit policies against
gender discrimination
Explicit policies against socio-
economic discrimination
OECD average-30
Percentage of principals reporting that the following policies and practices are implemented
in their school%
29. Fig I.2.1 - Teaching practices
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Tell students to follow classroom rules
Tell students to listen to what I say
Calm students who are disruptive
When the lesson begins, tell students to quieten down quickly
Explain to students what I expect them to learn
Explain how new and old topics are related
Set goals at the beginning of instruction
Refer to a problem from everyday life or work
Present a summary of recently learned content
Let students practise similar tasks
Give tasks that require students to think critically
Have students work in small groups to come up with a solution
Let students to solve complex tasks
Present tasks for which there is no obvious solution
Let students use ICT for projects or class work
Give students projects that require at least one week to complete
OECD average-31
Percentage of teachers who frequently or always use the following practices in their class
Classroom
management
Clarity of
instruction
Cognitive
activation
Enhanced
activities
%
31. 50
60
70
80
90
More than 30% Fewer than or equal
to 30%
Under age 30 Age 50 and above Novice Experienced
By concentration of students from socio-
economically disadvantaged homes
By age By teaching experience
Fig I.2.5/B- Less time is spent on teaching in
disadvantaged schools
Average proportion of time teachers spend on actual teaching and learning in a typical
classroom, by teacher and school characteristics (OECD average-31)
%
33. Fig I.4.4- In the OECD, teachers lack
preparation in some areas
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Content of some or all subject(s) taught
General pedagogy
Pedagogy of some or all subject(s) taught
Classroom practice in some or all subject(s) taught
Student behaviour and classroom management
Monitoring students’ development and learning
Teaching cross-curricular skills
Teaching in a mixed ability setting
Use of ICT for teaching
Teaching in a multicultural or multilingual setting
Element was included in formal education or training Well or "very well" prepared for the element
%
Percentage of teachers for whom… / who felt…
OECD average-31
39%
81%
35. Fig Tab I.4.14- And about a quarter of novice
teachers have a mentor
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
UnitedArabEmirates
SouthAfrica
Kazakhstan
Singapore
Brazil
NewZealand
Shanghai(China)
Japan
Israel
Australia
UnitedStates
SaudiArabia
VietNam
England(UK)
Netherlands
Colombia
Russia
Alberta(Canada)
Flemish(Belgium)
Mexico
Georgia
Korea
Malta
OECDaverage-31
CzechRepublic
Portugal
Belgium
Iceland
Bulgaria
Romania
Turkey
SlovakRepublic
Sweden
Hungary
Chile
Norway
Denmark
CABA(Argentina)
Latvia
France
Estonia
Finland
Austria
Croatia
Spain
Italy
Lithuania
Slovenia
Novice teachers Experienced teachers
Percentage of teachers who have an assigned mentor as part of a formal arrangement at the
school, by teachers' teaching experience
%
22%
37. Fig I.5.4/A – Relationship between teachers' job
satisfaction and participation in impactful professional
development
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
UnitedArabEmirates
Singapore
UnitedStates
Korea
England(UK)
Alberta(Canada)
Australia
Shanghai(China)
Japan
NewZealand
Turkey
Croatia
CABA(Argentina)
Sweden
Israel
Malta
Estonia
Colombia
SaudiArabia
Finland
OECDaverage-31
CzechRepublic
Brazil
Chile
SouthAfrica
Flemish(Belgium)
Latvia
Lithuania
Denmark
Italy
Spain
Romania
Portugal
France
Georgia
SlovakRepublic
Bulgaria
Austria
Belgium
Mexico
Iceland
Norway
VietNam
Slovenia
Kazakhstan
Netherlands
Change in the index of job satisfaction associated with having participated in impactful
professional development
Regression coefficient (β)
38. Fig I.5.3 - Type of professional development attended
by teachers and principals
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Courses and/or seminars attended in person
Reading professional literature
Education conferences
Peer and/or self-observation and coaching as part of a formal
arrangement
Participation in a professional network
Online courses and/or seminars
Other types of professional development activities
OECD average-31: Teachers
OECD average-30: Principals
Percentage of teachers and principals who participated in the following professional
development activities
%
39. Fig I.5.6/B – Participation in professional
development for teachers and need for it
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Knowledge and understanding of my subject field(s)
Pedagogical competencies in teaching my subject field(s)
Student assessment practices
Knowledge of the curriculum
ICT skills for teaching
Student behaviour and classroom management
Teaching cross-curricular skills
Analysis and use of student assessments
Approaches to individualised learning
Teaching students with special needs
Teacher-parent/guardian co-operation
School management and administration
Teaching in a multicultural or multilingual setting
Communicating with people from different cultures or countries
Topic was included in professional development activities
High level of need for professional development in the topic %
Percentage of teachers for whom the following topics were included in their professional
development activities in the 12 months prior the survey and report a high level of need for them
46. TALIS 2018 Results - Volume II
Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals
Chapter 2: Teachers and school leaders valued as professionals
Illustrates the prestige and the status of the teaching profession as
elements of its attractiveness
Describes teachers’ and school leaders’ satisfaction with both their work
environment and the profession
Identifies levels and sources of stress among teachers and school leaders
Examines teachers’ absenteeism and turnover in schools as well as
teachers’ plans to leave teaching
Chapter 3: Providing teachers and school leaders with secure, flexible and
rewarding jobs
Describes job security and flexible time arrangements in schools
Reports on frequency, sources and methods of teacher appraisal and their
consequences on both salary and career progression
Examines teachers’ and school leaders’ satisfaction with salary and other
terms of employment such as autonomy or support for professional
development
47. Chapter 4: Fostering collaboration to improve professionalism
Describes how teachers collaborate among each others and how often they
engage in collaborative activities
Presents teachers’ views on collegiality (i.e. having good interpersonal
relationships with colleagues) and the culture of collaboration in schools
Reports on methods and sources of teacher feedback and on their impact
on specific aspect of teaching (e.g. pedagogical competencies in teaching
and use of student assessments to improve student learning)
Chapter 5: Empowering teachers and school leaders
Illustrates how responsibilities are distributed between schools and out-
of-schools authorities (i.e. school autonomy)
Describes how the school management team is composed and how
responsibilities are distributed within schools
Presents principals’, teachers’ and system’s leadership as well as
principals’ and teachers’ views on their relations with policy makers and
the media
TALIS 2018 Results - Volume II
Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals
48. TALIS 2018 Products
What’s next?
• 23 March 2020, 11am Paris time
– TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals
– Full TALIS dataset for ISCED 2 and all TALIS options: Volume I and II
– TALIS Teachers’ Guide (Volume II)
– Policy Insights brochure (Volume I and II)
– Other TALIS 2018 Products (Videos, Infographics…)
• Further thematic reports (tentative)
– Dec 2020 - Schools performing against the odds (TALIS-PISA link option)
– Sept 2021 - Primary and upper secondary education teachers and principals (ISCED 1
and 3 options)
– Feb 2022 - Equity issues across schools, teachers and students
49. Find out more about TALIS at www.oecd.org/talis
All national and international publications
The complete micro-level database
The 2018 conceptual framework and questionnaires
Email: TALIS@oecd.org
Editor's Notes
http://www.oecd.org/education/talis/
Note to Andreas:
We expect many TGB members (and possibly the Consortium as well) to register for the pre-launch webinar, so we suggest keeping this slide to acknowledge them, and if you can take this opportunity to thank them, this would be a nice gesture.
Note to Andreas:
This is an alternative way to present participants, but not our preferred one. There is also the issue of the Cyprus footnote that is currently missing.
TALIS 2018 content in a nutshell:
2 new thematic areas to remain policy relevant
Innovation capacity (organisation and team innovativeness)
Teaching in diverse environments in terms of social & cultural composition of the student body (equity and diversity beliefs and practices, self-efficacy in multicultural classrooms and environments)
New content to expand existing themes
Commitment to teaching profession (motivation to join profession, teacher attrition and turnover, principals’ and teachers’ career plans/attrition)
Satisfaction with level of autonomy in target class
Stress and well-being (workplace well-being and stress, sources of stress)
Policy influence (perception of value and policy influence, teachers’ spending priorities)
These 11 themes are organised around the concept of professionalism.
Understanding teachers and school leaders as “professionals” means having high expectations of them. It means they should not only conduct their work in an effective manner, but work to improve their skills, collaborate with colleagues and parents, and think creatively about the challenges they face.
Education communities also have the responsibility of having open and direct dialogue with the teaching profession in order to design the guidelines and allocate the resources needed to help teachers and school leaders further develop as professionals.
TALIS 2018 examined the degree of professionalism in the teaching profession
Volume I: Teachers and school leaders need to be lifelong learners to develop and sustain a strong knowledge base
Volume II: Teachers and school leaders need to be valued and supported as the professionals they are
Knowledge and skills base
This was the focus of TALIS 2018 Volume I, released in June 2019
Prestige and standing
Societal value, job satisfaction, stress, and risk of attrition
Career opportunities
Working conditions in terms of job security and flexibility, appraisal processes and teachers’ satisfaction with reward structures and other working conditions
Peer regulation and collaborative culture
Collaborative aspects of teachers’ work in terms of frequency, methods, and impact, collegiality and feedback
Responsibility and autonomy
Autonomy and leadership over decisions
While about 90% of teachers cite the opportunity to contribute to children’s development and society as a major motivation to join the profession, only 61% say that the steady career path offered by teaching was an important part of their decision making.
2 out of 3 teachers in the OECD (66.5%) also report that teaching was their first choice as a career, again highlighting their commitment to the job
Female teachers are more likely to report teaching as their first career choice (69%) than male teachers (59%)
Teaching was the first‑choice career for two out of three teachers in OECD countries participating in TALIS. But this is true for only 59% of male teachers, compared to 70% of female teachers.
The average age of teachers in OECD countries participating in TALIS is 44, but there is considerable variation across countries.
Karine
However, 14% of principals report regular acts of intimidation or bullying among their students. These incidents have decreased in a number of countries since 2013, but increased in others
More than 90% of school leaders report that their school has implemented policies aiming at teaching students to be inclusive of different socio-economic background and about 75% state that their school has adopted explicit policies against socio-economic discrimination.
[1]
During a typical lesson, practices centred on managing the class and ensuring clarity of instruction are widely applied in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, with at least two‑thirds of teachers frequently relying on these practices.
[2]
What is less prevalent, however, is the use of practices that involve student cognitive activation (i.e. getting students to evaluate information and apply knowledge in order to solve a problem), despite their high potential leverage on student learning. Only around half of teachers adopt this approach.
In OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, only 78% of a typical lesson is dedicated to teaching, with the remainder of the time spent keeping order or dealing with classroom administrative tasks. In around half of the countries that participate in TALIS, this represents a decrease in time spent on actual teaching and learning in class over the last five to ten years.
This problem is more acute
For teachers working in more challenging schools (75% - 64%)
For younger teachers (73% - 65%)
And for those who are less experienced (74% - 65%)
When teachers reach the stage of actually teaching, upon completing their initial preparation, only 38% of them participate in some kind of formal or informal induction in their first school, despite the positive impact of induction processes on novice teachers’ transition to school and perceived efficacy.
Only 22% of novice teachers report having an assigned mentor on average across the OECD, despite the fact that 2 thirds of schools (64%) offer mentoring programmes
Taking part in some kind of in-service training is commonplace among teachers and principals in the OECD countries and economies that participate in TALIS, with more than 90% of teachers and principals having attended at least one professional development activity in the year prior to the survey. Attending courses and seminars outside of school is one of the most popular types of professional development for teachers – more than 70% participate in this kind of training. Only 44% of teachers, however, participate in training based on peer learning and networking, despite the fact that collaborative learning is one of the aspects of training that teachers in TALIS identify as the most impactful.
But some areas of professional development are still lacking, according to teachers. Developing advanced ICT skills is one area in which teachers say that they need more training, along with teaching in multicultural/multilingual settings and teaching students with special needs.