Technology Integration in the Classroom - A case study in learning engagement...William Welder
This presentation, presented at the Houston Association of Talent Development (ATD) 2014 conference highlights two case studies in which training practitioners take a creative approach to leverage existing technologies for business results.
Session Objective:
* Dispel common concerns around technical training assessment.
* Repurpose existing learning resources for extended use in the organization.
* Identify methods to drive engagement in the classroom.
* List reporting and analytics critical for compliance management and continuous improvement.
* Outline considerations for systems integration projects.
* Overcome obstacles to training delivery and management.
Technology Integration in the Classroom - A case study in learning engagement...William Welder
This presentation, presented at the Houston Association of Talent Development (ATD) 2014 conference highlights two case studies in which training practitioners take a creative approach to leverage existing technologies for business results.
Session Objective:
* Dispel common concerns around technical training assessment.
* Repurpose existing learning resources for extended use in the organization.
* Identify methods to drive engagement in the classroom.
* List reporting and analytics critical for compliance management and continuous improvement.
* Outline considerations for systems integration projects.
* Overcome obstacles to training delivery and management.
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYSYLLABUSFACULTY ME.docxambersalomon88660
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYSYLLABUS
FACULTY MEMBER: Greg Hughes TERM: Summer 2016 Block 2
COURSE TITLE: IT Policy & Strategy
COURSE NUMBER: IST.7100
TEXTBOOK: TITLE:
AUTHOR:
If you would like more precise information regarding the textbook(s) for this class, please visit the bookstore website at http://www.wilmcoll.edu/bookstore
METHOD OF CONTACT:
PREREQUISITE: IST7000, IST7020, IST7040, IST7060
All courses are open to students from all divisions. Only where a course is preceded by an introduction course is there a need to observe a prerequisite. However, students might benefit from prior knowledge on some of the courses, and this is given as the content found in your course catalogue by course code.
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
The focus of this course includes: 1) The top management’s strategic perspective for aligning competitive strategy, core competencies, and information systems; 2) The development and implementation of policies and plans to achieve organizational goals; 3) Defining the systems that support the operational, administrative, and strategic needs of the organization, its business units, and individual employees; 4) Approaches to managing the information systems’ function in organizations, including examination of the dual challenges of effectively controlling the use of well-established information technologies, while experimenting with selected emerging technologies; and 5) The role of the CIO.
II. RATIONALE
Students develop an understanding of the strategic use of information technology from a business perspective at the enterprise level. They are expected to understand the internal management of information systems services from the point of view of the CIO and to examine alternative strategies and tactics available to management to achieve goals. Working students and students with post-baccalaureate experience will be able to examine the current and potential impact of information and information technology on all aspects of their position, firm, and industry.
III. MAJOR INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS
Goal A. Understand the role of IT in reaching business objectives
Learning Outcomes: The student will be able to:
A-1 Differentiate between strategy, vision and strategic objectives
A-2 Differentiate between effective business strategies based on a company’s vision, strategy, and mission statements
A-3 Identify the significance of the five levels of Strategic Alignment Maturity
A-4 Identify the primary differences between strategic, tactical and operational processes
Goal B. Understand the role of governance and communication in the selection and use of organizational processes to make decisions about how to obtain and deploy IT resources
Learning Outcome:The student will be able to:
B-1 Understand the components of a strategic plan
B-2 Identify organizational types and use in case study application
B-3 Identify the components of IT architecture
B-4 Identify .
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYSYLLABUSFACULTY ME.docxambersalomon88660
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYSYLLABUS
FACULTY MEMBER: Greg Hughes TERM: Summer 2016 Block 2
COURSE TITLE: IT Policy & Strategy
COURSE NUMBER: IST.7100
TEXTBOOK: TITLE:
AUTHOR:
If you would like more precise information regarding the textbook(s) for this class, please visit the bookstore website at http://www.wilmcoll.edu/bookstore
METHOD OF CONTACT:
PREREQUISITE: IST7000, IST7020, IST7040, IST7060
All courses are open to students from all divisions. Only where a course is preceded by an introduction course is there a need to observe a prerequisite. However, students might benefit from prior knowledge on some of the courses, and this is given as the content found in your course catalogue by course code.
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
The focus of this course includes: 1) The top management’s strategic perspective for aligning competitive strategy, core competencies, and information systems; 2) The development and implementation of policies and plans to achieve organizational goals; 3) Defining the systems that support the operational, administrative, and strategic needs of the organization, its business units, and individual employees; 4) Approaches to managing the information systems’ function in organizations, including examination of the dual challenges of effectively controlling the use of well-established information technologies, while experimenting with selected emerging technologies; and 5) The role of the CIO.
II. RATIONALE
Students develop an understanding of the strategic use of information technology from a business perspective at the enterprise level. They are expected to understand the internal management of information systems services from the point of view of the CIO and to examine alternative strategies and tactics available to management to achieve goals. Working students and students with post-baccalaureate experience will be able to examine the current and potential impact of information and information technology on all aspects of their position, firm, and industry.
III. MAJOR INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS
Goal A. Understand the role of IT in reaching business objectives
Learning Outcomes: The student will be able to:
A-1 Differentiate between strategy, vision and strategic objectives
A-2 Differentiate between effective business strategies based on a company’s vision, strategy, and mission statements
A-3 Identify the significance of the five levels of Strategic Alignment Maturity
A-4 Identify the primary differences between strategic, tactical and operational processes
Goal B. Understand the role of governance and communication in the selection and use of organizational processes to make decisions about how to obtain and deploy IT resources
Learning Outcome:The student will be able to:
B-1 Understand the components of a strategic plan
B-2 Identify organizational types and use in case study application
B-3 Identify the components of IT architecture
B-4 Identify .
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
Systems Analysis and Design for BSA
1. Notre Dame of Midsayap College
Midsayap, Cotabato
A.Y. 2012-2013
Vision-Mission: We envision to bring the best of Notre Dame Spirit to Asia and the rest of the world.
As a Filipino academic community, Notre Dame of Midsayap College commits herself to empower each person to lead
meaningful life and to make a positive difference through quality, relevant and liberating education.
Course Number: IT N 103
Course Title: I.T Concepts and Systems Analysis & Design
Credits: 3 units Laboratory
Number of Hours: 54 hours
Pre-requisites: 2rd Year
Course Description:
This course covers the different phases of systems development focusing on analysis and design. Students will learn the
rudiments of systems development through a feasibility study.
General Objectives: This course is designed to provide knowledge and understanding and skills of information technology will learn
to gather information in order to identify problems to be solved. They will determine system requirements and a
logical design for an information system.
Subject Goals: At the end of the course, the students are expected to:
• Translate business requirements into systems models.
• Design solutions for business requirements.
• Make a system proposal to a variety of business organization and to understand the importance of their system.
• Apply interviewing and data gathering techniques and best practices.
• Present the result of systems analysis and be able to learn how to compare the existing system to the proposed system.
• Design a proposed system and present its feasibility.
• Demonstrate the team and interpersonal skills.
2. Key Concepts: systems analysis and design, systems development life cycle, information, analyst, user, coding and testing, customers, use case ,
context diagram, ERD, database, GUI, feasibility
Course Requirements:
• Quizzes and assignments
• Officially scheduled examination
• Research through the internet
• Presentation of the project
• Portfolio – software develop in a selected language (vb, access, sql, java, dot net)
References:
* Books
*Textbook
R1 - Kendal & Kendall. Systems Analysis and Design, Eight Edition, Printice Hall, 2011
*References
R2 – Jeffrey L. Whitten, Lonnie D. Bentley. Introduction to System Analysis and Design. Mc-Graw Hills Company, Inc. 2008.
R3 – Hoffer, J., George, J., Valacich, J. Modern Systems Analysis and Design, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, 2002
R4 – Satzinger, J.W., Jackson, R.B., Burd, S.D. Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 2nd edition. Thomson Learning, 2002.
R5 – Shelly, G.B., Cashman, T.J., Rosenblatt, H.J. Systems Analysis and Design, 4th edition. Thomson Learning, 2002.
*Internet
http://www.nos.org/cca/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4052801/Introduction-to-System-Analysis-and-Design
http://www.nor.org/htm/sad1.htm
http://www.sribd.com/doc/7368533/system-analysis-and-design
Prepared by:
Michaelangelo R. Serrano
CITE Faculty
Noted by:
Engr. Ronniel D. Labio, MIT
CITE Dean
3. GRADING SYSTEM
I. Grade Equivalents
1.0 97 – 100
1.25 94 - 96
1.50 91 - 93
1.75 88 - 90
2.0 85 – 87
2.25 82 - 84
2.50 79 - 81
2.75 76 - 78
3.0 75
4.0 73 – 74 [Conditional]
5.0 Failure
II. Grade Components
^ Trinal Grade = [Item I + Item II] / 2 ^ Midterm Grade = [Item I + Item II] /2 ^ Final Grade = Trinal Grade + Midterm Grade + 2 TFG
4
where: where: where:
Item I = 60% Item Ia + 40% Item Ib Item I = 60% Item Ia + 40% Item Ib Tentative Final Grade (TFG) = [Item I + Item II] /2
Item Ia = Quizzes, Class Recitations Item Ia = Quizzes, Class Recitations Item I = 60% Item Ia + 40% Item Ib
Item Ib = Assignments, Reports, Experiments Item Ib = Assignments, Reports, Experiments Item Ia = Quizzes, Class Recitations
Item II = Trinal Exam Equivalent Item II = Midterm Exam Equivalent Item Ib = Assignments, Reports, Experiments
Item II = Final Exam Equivalent
Notes:
• Passing Score in all Examinations is Fifty Percent (50%)
• A candidate for Cum Laude must obtain a weighted average grade ranging from [1.50 to 1.75], with no grade below 2.0
• A candidate for Magna Cum Laude must obtain a weighted average grade ranging from [1.25 to 1.49], with no grade below 1.75
• A candidate for Summa Cum Laude must obtain a weighted average grade ranging from [1.0 to 1.24], with no grade below 1.50
4. • A student who obtain a grade of 4.0 in any of the subjects during the Trinal and during the Midterm Exams, the teacher concern may give a re-ex-
amination/requirements.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES LEARNING CONTENTS TIME LEARNING VALUES REFRENCES EVALUATION
ALLOCATION ACTIVITIES INFUSED
At the end of the 1. Introduction to Systems
discussion, the students is 3 hours * Discussion * Patience R1 Quiz,
expected to: a. Definition of a System * Lecture * Appreciation R2 Recitation,
a. Understand the meaning b. Characteristics of a * Awareness R3 Homework
of a system and systems System * Respect R4
analysis and design c. The Modern Systems * Courtesy R5
b. Identify the Analyst * Cooperation
characteristics of a a. Types of Information * Discipline
system Systems
c. Know and realize the b. Integrating Technolo-
modern system analyst gies for Information
d. Understand the Systems
integration technologies
for information systems
At the end of the term, the II. Information Systems Devel-
students is expected to: opment Life Cycle and
a. Describe each phases of Methodologies 3 hours * Discussion * Patience R1 Quiz,
SDLC * Lecture * Appreciation R2 Recitation,
b. Understand the spiral life a. Description and Phas- * Awareness R3 Homework,
cycle and prototyping es * Respect R4 group
c. Understand the joint b. Spiral Life Cycle * Courtesy R5 discussion
application design and c. Prototyping * Cooperation
rapid application d. Joint Application De- * Discipline
development sign
d. Discuss other alternatives e. Rapid Application De-
and methods velopment
f. Other Alternatives
5. At the end of the term, the III. Systems Development
students is expected to: Project Fundamentals
5 hours * Discussion * patience R1 Quiz,
a. Identify a project a. Project Initiation * Lecture * Appreciation R2 Recitation,
feasibility b. Determining Project * * Awareness R3 Homework
b. Create activity planning Feasibility Demonstratio * Respect R4
and control c. Activity Planning and n * Courtesy R5
c. Create and maximize Control * Cooperation
project scheduling d. Project Scheduling * Discipline
d. Learn in managing e. Managing Systems * understanding
systems analysis team Analysis Team Mem-
members bers
At the end of the term, the IV. Requirements Gathering
students is expected to: and Analysis 10 hours * Discussion * patience R1 Quiz,
a. Conduct sampling and * Lecture * Appreciation R2 Recitation,
investigate hard data a. Sampling and Investi- * * Awareness R3 Homework
b. Conduct an interview gating Hard Data Demonstratio * Respect R4
c. Formulate questionnaire b. Interviewing n * Courtesy R5
d. Observe office work c. Using Questionnaires * Cooperation
environment d. Observing Decision- * Discipline
e. Analyze the cause and Maker Behavior and * understanding
effect of the project the Office Environ-
f. Identify and understand ment
tools for analysis and e. Cause and Effect Anal-
requirements ysis
documentation f. Tools for Analysis and
g. Identify and use Requirements Docu-
alternative tools mentation
g. Considering Alterna-
tive Tools
6. V. Logical Design
At the end of the term, the (Review and application of
students is expected to: concepts from previous 6 hours * Discussion * patience R1 Quiz,
courses on HCI and * Lecture * Appreciation R2 Recitation,
a. Design effective output / Databases, including * Awareness R3 Homework
reports CD,ERD, UML diagrams) * Respect R4
b. Design effective input / * Courtesy R5 Laboratory
forms a. Designing Effective Output * Cooperation exercises
c. Design a databases (Reports) * Discipline Assignment
d. Design the user b. Designing Effective Input * understanding
interface (Forms)
e. Design accurate data- c. Designing Databases
entry procedures d. Designing the User Inter-
faces
e. Designing Accurate Data-
Entry Procedures
At the end of the term, the VI. Physical Design
students is expected to: 6 hours * Discussion * patience R1 Quiz,
a. Design a databases * Lecture * Appreciation R2 Recitation,
(relationships) a. Designing Databases * Awareness R3 Homework
b. Design the internal b. Designing the Internal * Respect R4
program Program * Courtesy R5 Laboratory
c. Design the processes of c. Designing the Process- * Cooperation exercises
the program es * Discipline Assignment
* understanding
7. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES LEARNING CONTENTS TIME LEARNING VALUES REFRENCES EVALUATION
ALLOCATION ACTIVITIES INFUSED
At the end of the
discussion, the students is VII. Systems Implementation
expected to: 15 hours * Discussion * patience R1 Laboratory
a. Coding * Lecture * Appreciation R2 exercises
a. Code, test, install and b. Testing * Awareness R3 Assignment
configure the system c. Installation and Configu- * Respect R4
b. Document the system, ration * Courtesy R5
training, and supporting d. Documenting the Sys- * Cooperation
users tem, Training, and Sup- * Discipline
c. Identify strategies porting Users * understanding
aimed at making e. Strategies aimed at
computers installation making computer instal-
more profitable lation more profitable
d. Identify strategies when (Outsourcing, Insourc-
deciding what to do ing, Downsizing)
with inefficient old f. Strategies when decid-
system ing what to do with inef-
ficient old systems
VII. Maintaining Information
a. enhance and maintain Systems 3 hours * patience R1 Laboratory
the system * Appreciation R2 exercises
* Awareness R3 Assignment
VIII. Cost-Benefit Analysis * Respect R4
b. identify and analyze the 3 hours * Courtesy R5
cost and benefit of the * Cooperation
program * Discipline
* understanding