Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation(new method)Ravikumar Tiwari
This presentation explains the new method (based on attainment level) of Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation. (with reference to National Board of Accreditation new SAR)
An Empirical Study on Attainment of Course Outcome for an Engineering course ...iosrjce
IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME) is an open access journal that publishes articles which contribute new results in all areas of research & method in education. The goal of this journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners from academia and industry to focus on advanced research & method in education concepts and establishing new collaborations in these areas.
Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation(new method)Ravikumar Tiwari
This presentation explains the new method (based on attainment level) of Course Outcome and Program Outcome Calculation. (with reference to National Board of Accreditation new SAR)
An Empirical Study on Attainment of Course Outcome for an Engineering course ...iosrjce
IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME) is an open access journal that publishes articles which contribute new results in all areas of research & method in education. The goal of this journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners from academia and industry to focus on advanced research & method in education concepts and establishing new collaborations in these areas.
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYSYLLABUSFACULTY ME.docxambersalomon88660
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYSYLLABUS
FACULTY MEMBER: Greg Hughes TERM: Summer 2016 Block 2
COURSE TITLE: IT Policy & Strategy
COURSE NUMBER: IST.7100
TEXTBOOK: TITLE:
AUTHOR:
If you would like more precise information regarding the textbook(s) for this class, please visit the bookstore website at http://www.wilmcoll.edu/bookstore
METHOD OF CONTACT:
PREREQUISITE: IST7000, IST7020, IST7040, IST7060
All courses are open to students from all divisions. Only where a course is preceded by an introduction course is there a need to observe a prerequisite. However, students might benefit from prior knowledge on some of the courses, and this is given as the content found in your course catalogue by course code.
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
The focus of this course includes: 1) The top management’s strategic perspective for aligning competitive strategy, core competencies, and information systems; 2) The development and implementation of policies and plans to achieve organizational goals; 3) Defining the systems that support the operational, administrative, and strategic needs of the organization, its business units, and individual employees; 4) Approaches to managing the information systems’ function in organizations, including examination of the dual challenges of effectively controlling the use of well-established information technologies, while experimenting with selected emerging technologies; and 5) The role of the CIO.
II. RATIONALE
Students develop an understanding of the strategic use of information technology from a business perspective at the enterprise level. They are expected to understand the internal management of information systems services from the point of view of the CIO and to examine alternative strategies and tactics available to management to achieve goals. Working students and students with post-baccalaureate experience will be able to examine the current and potential impact of information and information technology on all aspects of their position, firm, and industry.
III. MAJOR INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS
Goal A. Understand the role of IT in reaching business objectives
Learning Outcomes: The student will be able to:
A-1 Differentiate between strategy, vision and strategic objectives
A-2 Differentiate between effective business strategies based on a company’s vision, strategy, and mission statements
A-3 Identify the significance of the five levels of Strategic Alignment Maturity
A-4 Identify the primary differences between strategic, tactical and operational processes
Goal B. Understand the role of governance and communication in the selection and use of organizational processes to make decisions about how to obtain and deploy IT resources
Learning Outcome:The student will be able to:
B-1 Understand the components of a strategic plan
B-2 Identify organizational types and use in case study application
B-3 Identify the components of IT architecture
B-4 Identify .
How to create a course as a Project Brief on an E-Learning Project called Elevate -A foundational certification on
Project Management.Learn the method of breaking down a course structure and create a comprehensive format of delivery.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
1. 0
BACHELOR OF QUANTITY SURVEYING (HONOURS)
MEASUREMENT IV
(QSB60404)
MODULE OUTLINE
MARCH 2018
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING AND DESIGN
Centre for Modern Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia
2. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 1
Programme Bachelor of Quantity Surveying (Honours)
Module MEASUREMENT IV (QSB 60404)
Prerequisite Measurement III
Credit Hours 5
Classification Core Module
Instructor Sr Loo Seong King (SeongKing.Loo@taylors.edu.my)
Module Synopsis
The module covers the measurement of bored piles, renovation and demolition works and various
elements of external works. It also covers introduction on the principles of specification writing,
form of specification writing and their uses for the various trades.
.
Module Teaching Objectives
The teaching objectives of the module are:
1. To familarise with the nature of tendering process and contractual documentation.
2. The ability to locate, extract and analyse data from multiple sources including drawn information.
3. The ability to question standard practice, and to apply professional judgement in making
recommendations and solving problems for future best practice.
Module Learning Outcomes (MLO)
The objectives of the module are translated into a number of Module Learning Outcomes (MLO),
mapped to Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO) and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC).
No. MLO PLO TGC
1
Recognize the items measurable for bored piles, renovation and demolition
works, and various external works.
2 1.1
2
Distinguish and illustrate differences in writing-up descriptions in
accordance to design changes for bored piles, renovation and demolition
works, and various external works.
4
1.3
2.2
3
Evaluate the relationship between Specifications, Drawings and Bill of
Quantities in Tender Documents for bored piles, renovation and demolition
works, and various external works.
6 3.2
4
Generate a conceptual understanding of and the ability to competently
carry out the preparation of the Bills of Quantities for bored piles,
renovation and demolition works, and various external works.
1
1.1
1.3
3.2
5.1
Modes of Delivery and TIMeS
3. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 2
This is a 6 credit hour module conducted over a period of 14 weeks. The modes of delivery will
be in the form of lectures, tutorials and self-directed study. The breakdown of the contact hours
for the module is as follows:
Lecture: 3 hours/week
Tutorial: 3 hours/week
Self-directed study: 8.29 hours/week
TIMeS will be used as a communication tool and information portal for students to access module
materials, project briefs, assignments and announcements.
Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)*
The Bachelor of Quantity Surveying (Honours) programme has as its objectives that graduates
exemplify the following Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO) that will enable them to:
No. Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)
1
Engage in inquiry-based learning, primarily in Quantity Surveying Practices, where students learn to
acquire skills to research, analyse and evaluate material which is relevant to a particular project
2
Introductory knowledge of measurement, management and contractual involved in the development
and construction process
3
Evaluate all relevant aspects of management and other specialisms taking account of regulations, the
needs of society and ethical correctness
4 Convey results of work effectively both orally and in writing
5 Encourage leadership, effective group dynamics and self-development
6 Understand the logical sequence of local construction practices
7 Use of IT and communicate effectively
*Source: The Manual of Accreditation for Quantity Surveying Programmes, Board of Quantity Surveyors
Malaysia, 2013
4. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 3
Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC)
The teaching and learning approach at Taylor’s University is focused on developing the Taylor’s
Graduate Capabilities (TGC) in its students; capabilities that encompass the knowledge, cognitive
capabilities and soft skills of its graduates.
Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC)
1. Discipline Specific Knowledge
1.1 Able to put theories into practice
1.2 Understand ethical issues in the context of the field of study
1.3 Understand professional practice within the field of study
2. Lifelong Learning
2.1 Learn independently
2.2 Locate, extract, synthesize and utilize information effectively
2.3 Be intellectual engaged
3. Thinking and Problem Solving skills
3.1 Think critically and creatively
3.2 Define and analyze problems to arrive at effective solutions
4. Communication Skills
4.1 Communicate appropriately in various settings and modes
5. Interpersonal Skills
5.1 Understand team dynamics and mobilize the power of teams
5.2 Understand and assume leadership
6. Intrapersonal Skills
6.1 Manage oneself and be self–reliant
6.2 Reflection one’s action and learning
6.3 Embody Taylor’s core values
7. Citizenship and Global Perspectives
7.1 Be aware of and form opinions from diverse perspectives
7.2 Understand the value of civic responsibility and community engagement
8. Digital Literacy
8.1 Effective use of ICT and related technology
5. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 4
Types of Assessments and Feedback
You will be graded in the form of formative and summative assessments. Formative assessment
involves participation in discussions and feedback sessions. Summative assessment will inform you
about the level of understanding and performance capabilities achieved at the end of the module.
No. Assessment Components Type MLO Weightage
1 Test 1 Formative 1,2,3 10%
2 Project 1 Formative 1,2,3,4, 30%
3 Project 2 Formative 1,2 10%
3 Final Examination Formative 1,2,3,4 50%
4 Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio Summative 1,2,3,4 Pass/Fail
Total 100%
Assessment Components
1. Test
This is a test on principles of measurement, the understanding and application of the clauses
in the Standard Method of Measurement 2 (SMM2) on the topics studied until week 5.
Project 1
This will be a group project where a group of 6 students will measure all elements of a double
storey building including the production of the Bills of Quantities and culminating in the
preparation of a set of Tender Documents for calling of tender.
2. Project 2
This will be an Elemental Cost Analysis (ECA) Workshop where a group of up to 8 students will
prepare detail cost analysis of a building project culminating in the preparation of an ECA
report.
3. Final Examination
The final examination is designed to assess the ability of the students in the measurement of
piling works and external works in accordance to the “Standard Method of Measurement of
Building Works – Second Edition (SMM2)”. The students are also tested on their ability to
locate, extract and analyse data from multiple sources including drawn information and
specifications.
4. Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio (TGCP)
6. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 5
The Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio is a document that collates all assessments
produced in a module and reflects a student’s acquisition of the Module Learning Outcomes
and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities. Each student is to develop an ePortfolio, a web-based
portfolio in the form of a personal academic blog. The ePortfolio is developed progressively
for all modules taken throughout Semesters 1 to 5, and culminates with a final Portfolio in
printed form produced in the final semester. The printed Portfolio must encapsulate the
acquisition of Programme Learning Outcomes and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities, and
showcase the distinctiveness and identity of the student as a graduate of the programme.
Marks and Grading Table
Assessments and grades will be returned within two weeks of your submission. You will be given
grades and necessary feedback for each submission. The grading system is shown below:
Grade Marks
Grade
Points
Definition Description
A 80 – 100 4.00 Excellent
Evidence of original thinking; demonstrated outstanding
capacity to analyze and synthesize; outstanding grasp of
module matter; evidence of extensive knowledge base.
A- 75 – 79 3.67 Very Good
Evidence of good grasp of module matter; critical
capacity and analytical ability; understanding of relevant
issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature.
B+ 70 – 74 3.33
Good
Evidence of grasp of module matter; critical capacity and
analytical ability, reasonable understanding of relevant
issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature.B 65 – 69 3.00
B- 60 – 64 2.67
Pass
Evidence of some understanding of the module matter;
ability to develop solutions to simple problems;
benefitting from his/her university experience.
C+ 55 – 59 2.33
C 50 – 54 2.00
D+ 47 – 49 1.67
Marginal Fail
Evidence of nearly but not quite acceptable familiarity
with module matter, weak in critical and analytical skills.
D 44 – 46 1.33
D- 40 – 43 1.00
F 0 – 39 0.00 Fail
Insufficient evidence of understanding of the module
matter; weakness in critical and analytical skills; limited
or irrelevant use of the literature.
WD - - Withdrawn
Withdrawn from a module before census date, typically
mid-semester [refer to Description 1 below].
F(W) 0 0.00 Fail Withdrawn after census date, typically mid-semester
7. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 6
[refer to Description 2 below].
IN - - Incomplete
An interim notation given for a module where a student
has not completed certain requirements with valid
reason or it is not possible to finalise the grade by the
published deadline.
P - - Pass Given for satisfactory completion of practicum.
AU - - Audit
Given for a module where attendance is for information
only without earning academic credit.
Description 1: Week 3 to week 7 (inclusive) for long semester, or week 3 to week 5 (inclusive) for short
semester. A short semester is less than 14 weeks. Not applicable for audit and internship.
Description 2: After week 7 for long semester, or after week 5 for short semester. A short semester is less
than 14 weeks. Not applicable for audit and internship.
Hurdle Assessment Guideline
To pass the module, a student needs to achieve firstly, a minimum passing mark of 20%,
equivalent to 40% of the final exam marks and secondly, a minimum mark of 50% in the overall
assessment failing which the student is required to re-sit the paper provided his overall
assessment mark is equal to or above 40%. A student with overall assessment below 40% will be
deemed to have failed this module and has to repeat the module. A subsequent failure in the re-
sit paper will deem that the student fails the module and has to repeat the module. In summary,
to pass the module, a student must achieve a minimum of 50% in the overall assessment and not
less than a minimum mark of 20%, equivalent to 40% of the final exam marks.
Students who failed will not be allowed to go for practical training.
In summary, to pass the module, a student must achieve a minimum of 50% in the overall
assessment and not less than a minimum mark of 20%, equivalent to 40% of the final exam
marks.
Coursework Assessments and Final Examination
A student must achieve a minimum of 40% for the final examination, and a final grade of C of the
overall assessment to pass the module.
A student who fails to attempt final examination will result in failing the module irrespective of
the overall marks earned, even though he/she has achieved 50% or more in the overall
assessment. He/she will not be allowed for resit examination.
8. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 7
Module Schedule (subject to change at short notice)
Date/Week
Lecture/Presentation Discussion/Tutorial Self-directed Study
Hours Hours Hours
26 March
Measurement of External Works:
Surface water Drainage.
In-class Discussion
Surface water
drainage
Week 1 3 3 8
2 April
(Last day to
add/drop a
module)
Measurement of External Works:
Surface water Drainage (cont’d)
ASSIGNMENT-ISSUANCE OF PROJECT
BRIEF
In-class Discussion
Surface water
drainage
Week 2 3 3 8
9 April
Measurement of External Works:
Surface water Drainage (cont’d)
In-class Discussion
Surface water
drainage
Week 3 3 3 9
16 April
Measurement of External Works: Sewer
Drainage
In-class Discussion Sewer drainage
Week 4 3 3 8
23 April
Measurement of External Works: Sewer
Drainage
APPROVAL OF ASSIGNMENT 1
DRAWINGS
In-class Discussion Sewer drainage
Week 5 3 3 8
30 April
Measurement of Piling works: Bored
Piles
In-class Discussion Piling works
Week 6 3 3 9
7 May
(Last day for
subject/module
withdrawal with
WD grade)
ECA Workshop
INTERIM INSPECTION OF PROJECT
ASSIGNMENT 1
In-class Discussion
RISM’S ECA
handbook
Week 7 3 3 9
9. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 8
Date/Week
Lecture/Presentation Discussion/Tutorial Self-directed Study
Hours Hours Hours
14 May
(Online Student
Registration)
TEST
Measurement of External works: Road
and Pavement
In-class Discussion
Road and
Pavement
Week 8 3 3 9
21 May
(Last day for
Online Student
Registration
(OSR))
Measurement of External Works: Road
and Pavement (cont’d)
In-class Discussion
Road and
pavement
Week 9 3 3 8
28 May
Measurement of External Works: Water
Reticulation
In-class Discussion Water reticulation
Week 10 3 3 8
4 June
(Online Course
Evaluation and
last day for
Subject/Module
Withdrawal with
F(W) grade)
Measurement of Alteration and
Demolition Works
In-class Discussion
Alteration and
demolition works
Week 11 3 3 8
11 June
(Last day of
Online Course
Evaluation)
E-LEARNING WEEK
(Hari Raya AdilFitri)
Preparation of specification clauses for
the various trades covered in the topics
for measurement
Discussion
Specification
preparation
Week 12 3 3 8
18 June
ASSIGNMENT 1– PROJECT
PRESENTATION AND SUBMISSION In-class Discussion Presentation
Week 13 3 3 8
25 June
Revision
SUBMISSION OF TGC PORTFOLIO
In-class Discussion Revision
Week 14 3 3 8
2 July STUDY WEEK - -
Week 15 - - -
10. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 9
Main References:
1. The Institutions of Surveyors Malaysia, Standard Method of Measurement of Building Works
(2nd Edition), Malaysia. ( RECOMMENDED TEXTBOOK )
2. Aqua Group, Specification Writing, Granada, London, 1982.
3. Bowyer J, Practical Specification, Hutchinson, 1981.
4. Christopher J. Willis, Elements of Quantity Surveying, (8th
Edition) BSP Professional Books
5. RICS/BEC, Project Specification, Building Project Information Committee, London, 1982.
6. Seeley IH, Building Quantities Explained, 4th
Edition, MacMillan, 1991.
7. Wilcox C & Shape JA, Worked Examples in Measurement of Construction Works, Vol 1 & 11
George Godwin, 1980.
Secondary References :
1. Ashworth A & Heath DC, Advanced Quantity Surveying, Butterworths, 1983.
2. Cot, PJ, Writing Specification for Construction, Mc Grawhill, London, 1994.
3. Jabatan Kerja Raya , Spesifikasi Piawai untuk Kerja-kerja Binaan Bangunan, JKR 344, 1989
4. RICS/BEC, Standard Method of Measurement of Building Works, 7th
Edition, RICS/BEC, London,
1988.
11. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 10
GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
Student-centered Learning
The module uses the Student-centered Learning (SCL) approach. Utilization of SCL embodies most
of the principles known to improve learning and to encourage student’s participation. SCL
requires students to be active, responsible participants in their own learning and instructors are to
facilitate the learning process. Various teaching and learning strategies such as experiential
learning, problem-based learning, site visits, group discussions, presentations, working in group
and etc. can be employed to facilitate the learning process. In SCL, students are expected to be:
active in their own learning;
self-directed to be responsible to enhance their learning abilities;
able to cultivate skills that are useful in today’s workplace;
active knowledge seekers;
active players in a team.
Attendance and Student Participation
Attendance is compulsory. Any student who arrives late after the first half-hour of class will be
considered as absent. The lectures and tutorials will assist you in expanding your ideas and your
assessments. A minimum of 80% attendance is required to pass the module and/or be eligible for
the final examination and/or presentation.
Students will be assessed based on their performance throughout the semester. Students are
expected to attend and participate actively in class. Class participation is an important component
of every module. Your participation in the module is encouraged. You have the opportunity to
participate in the following ways:
Your ideas and questions are welcomed, valued and encouraged.
Your input is sought to understand your perspectives, ideas and needs in planning module
revision.
You have opportunities to give feedback and issues will be addressed in response to that
feedback.
Do reflect on your performance in Portfolios.
Student evaluation on your views and experiences about the module are actively sought and
used as an integral part of improvement in teaching and continuous improvement.
Late Submission Penalty
The School imposes a late submission penalty for work submitted late without a valid reason e.g.
a medical certificate. Any work submitted after the deadline (which may have been extended)
12. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 11
shall have the percentage grade assigned to the work on face value reduced by 10% for the first
day and 5% for each subsequent day late. A weekend counts as one (1) day.
Individual members of staff shall be permitted to grant extensions for assessed work that they
have set if they are satisfied that a student has given good reasons.
Absenteeism at intermediate or final presentation will result in zero mark for that presentation.
The Board of Examiners may overrule any penalty imposed and allow the actual mark achieved to
be used if the late submission was for a good reason.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism, which is an attempt to present another person’s work as your own by not
acknowledging the source, is a serious case of misconduct which is deemed unacceptable by the
University.
"Work" includes written materials such as books, journals and magazine articles or other papers
and also includes films and computer programs. The two most common types of plagiarism are
from published materials and other students’ works.
1. Published Materials
In general, whenever anything from someone else’s work is used, whether it is an idea, an
opinion or the results of a study or review, a standard system of referencing should be used.
Examples of plagiarism may include a sentence or two, or a table or a diagram from a book or
an article used without acknowledgement.
Serious cases of plagiarism can be seen in cases where the entire paper presented by the
student is copied from another book, with an addition of only a sentence or two by the
student.
While the former can be treated as a simple failure to cite references, the latter is likely to be
viewed as cheating in an examination.
Though most assignments require the need for reference to other peoples’ works, in order to
avoid plagiarism, students should keep a detailed record of the sources of ideas and findings
and ensure that these sources are clearly quoted in their assignment. Note that plagiarism also
refers to materials obtained from the Internet too.
13. Measurement IV (QSB 60404): Mar 2018 12
2. Other Students’ Works
Circulating relevant articles and discussing ideas before writing an assignment is a common
practice. However, with the exception of group assignments, students should write their own
papers. Plagiarising the work of other students into assignments includes using identical or
very similar sentences, paragraphs or sections. When two students submit papers that are very
similar in tone and content, both are likely to be penalised.
Guide for Writing References:
- http://taylorslibrary.taylors.edu.my/user_skills/user_support_students
Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By:
……………………………… ……………………………… ………………………………
Lecturer Name:
Date:
Stream Coordinator Name:
Date:
Programme Director Name:
Date:
Remarks:
1. The Module Outline is to be distributed to the students in the first week of the semester.
2. Any changes to the Module Outline shall be communicated (in writing) to the
Programme Director and the approval revised version must be communicated to the
students.