This document discusses a proposed study comparing dilatational percutaneous tracheostomy (PDT) to surgical tracheostomy. The study aims to show that PDT is less time consuming and has a lower rate of complications than surgical tracheostomy. It also aims to prove that PDT is more economical and will replace surgical tracheostomy in intensive care units. The document provides background on the history and types of tracheostomies. It outlines the hypothesis, aims, operational definitions, study design, sample size, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data collection and analysis process for the proposed study comparing PDT to surgical tracheostomy.