Sentiment classification over Twitter is usually affected by the noisy nature (abbreviations, irregular forms) of tweets data. A popular procedure to reduce the noise of textual data is to remove stopwords by using pre-compiled stopword lists or more sophisticated methods for dynamic stopword identification. However, the effectiveness of removing stopwords in the context of Twitter sentiment classification has been debated in the last few years. In this paper we investigate whether removing stopwords helps or hampers the effectiveness of Twitter sentiment classification methods. To this end, we apply six different stopword identification methods to Twitter data from six different datasets and observe how removing stopwords affects two well-known supervised sentiment classification methods. We assess the impact of removing stopwords by observing fluctuations on the level of data sparsity, the size of the classifier's feature space and its classification performance. Our results show that using pre-compiled lists of stopwords negatively impacts the performance of Twitter sentiment classification approaches. On the other hand, the dynamic generation of stopword lists, by removing those infrequent terms appearing only once in the corpus, appears to be the optimal method to maintaining a high classification performance while reducing the data sparsity and substantially shrinking the feature space.
Here is a basic Linear Algebra review for the class of Machine Learning. This is actually becoming a new class in the mathematics of Intelligent Systems, there I will be teaching stuff in
1.- Linear Algebra - From the basics to the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem with applications
2.- Mathematical Analysis - from set to the Reimann Integral
3.- Topology - Mostly in Hilbert Spaces
4.- Optimization - Convex functions, KKT conditions, Duality Theory, etc.
The stuff is going to be interesting...
how,when and why to perform Feature scaling?
Different type of feature scaling Technique.
when to perform feature scaling?
why to perform feature scaling?
MinMax feature scaling techniques.
Unit vector scaling.
Here is a basic Linear Algebra review for the class of Machine Learning. This is actually becoming a new class in the mathematics of Intelligent Systems, there I will be teaching stuff in
1.- Linear Algebra - From the basics to the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem with applications
2.- Mathematical Analysis - from set to the Reimann Integral
3.- Topology - Mostly in Hilbert Spaces
4.- Optimization - Convex functions, KKT conditions, Duality Theory, etc.
The stuff is going to be interesting...
how,when and why to perform Feature scaling?
Different type of feature scaling Technique.
when to perform feature scaling?
why to perform feature scaling?
MinMax feature scaling techniques.
Unit vector scaling.
In machine learning, support vector machines (SVMs, also support-vector networks) are supervised learning models with associated learning algorithms that analyze data used for classification and regression analysis.
A workshop is intended for those who are interested in and are in the planning stages of conducting an RNA-Seq experiment. Topics to be discussed will include:
* Experimental Design of RNA-Seq experiment
* Sample preparation, best practices
* High throughput sequencing basics and choices
* Cost estimation
* Differential Gene Expression Analysis
* Data cleanup and quality assurance
* Mapping your data
* Assigning reads to genes and counting
* Analysis of differentially expressed genes
* Downstream analysis/visualizations and tables
RNA Sequence data analysis,Transcriptome sequencing, Sequencing steady state RNA in a sample is known as RNA-Seq. It is free of limitations such as prior knowledge about the organism is not required.
RNA-Seq is useful to unravel inaccessible complexities of transcriptomics such as finding novel transcripts and isoforms.
Data set produced is large and complex; interpretation is not straight forward.
Machine Learning - Accuracy and Confusion MatrixAndrew Ferlitsch
Abstract: This PDSG workshop introduces basic concepts on measuring accuracy of your trained model. Concepts covered are loss functions and confusion matrices.
Level: Fundamental
Requirements: No prior programming or statistics knowledge required.
Ways to evaluate a machine learning model’s performanceMala Deep Upadhaya
Some of the ways to evaluate a machine learning model’s performance.
In Summary:
Confusion matrix: Representation of the True positives (TP), False positives (FP), True negatives (TN), False negatives (FN)in a matrix format.
Accuracy: Worse happens when classes are imbalanced.
Precision: Find the answer of How much the model is right when it says it is right!
Recall: Find the answer of How many extra right ones, the model missed when it showed the right ones!
Specificity: Like Recall but the shift is on the negative instances.
F1 score: Is the harmonic mean of precision and recall so the higher the F1 score, the better.
Precision-Recall or PR curve: Curve between precision and recall for various threshold values.
ROC curve: Graph is plotted against TPR and FPR for various threshold values.
Depth-first search (DFS) is an algorithm for traversing or searching tree or graph data structures. The algorithm starts at the root node (selecting some arbitrary node as the root node in the case of a graph) and explores as far as possible along each branch before backtracking
Problem solving
Problem formulation
Search Techniques for Artificial Intelligence
Classification of AI searching Strategies
What is Search strategy ?
Defining a Search Problem
State Space Graph versus Search Trees
Graph vs. Tree
Problem Solving by Search
Most existing approaches to Twitter sentiment analysis assume that sentiment is explicitly expressed through affective words. Nevertheless, sentiment is often implicitly expressed via latent semantic relations, patterns and dependencies among words in tweets. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that automatically captures patterns of words of similar contextual semantics and sentiment in tweets. Unlike previous work on sentiment pattern extraction, our proposed approach does not rely on external and fixed sets of syntactical templates/patterns, nor requires deep analyses of the syntactic structure of sentences in tweets.
We evaluate our approach with tweet- and entity-level sentiment analysis tasks by using the extracted semantic patterns as classification features in both tasks. We use 9 Twitter datasets in our evaluation and compare the performance of our patterns against 6 state-of-the-art baselines. Results show that our patterns consistently outperform all other baselines on all datasets by 2.19% at the tweet-level and 7.5% at the entity-level in average F-measure.
Sentiment lexicons for sentiment analysis offer a simple, yet effective way to obtain the prior sentiment information of opinionated words in texts. However, words' sentiment orientations and strengths often change throughout various contexts in which the words appear. In this paper, we propose a lexicon adaptation approach that uses the contextual semantics of words to capture their contexts in tweet messages and update their prior sentiment orientations and/or strengths accordingly. We evaluate our approach on one state-of-the-art sentiment lexicon using three different Twitter datasets. Results show that the sentiment lexicons adapted by our approach outperform the original lexicon in accuracy and F-measure in two datasets, but give similar accuracy and slightly lower F-measure in one dataset.
In machine learning, support vector machines (SVMs, also support-vector networks) are supervised learning models with associated learning algorithms that analyze data used for classification and regression analysis.
A workshop is intended for those who are interested in and are in the planning stages of conducting an RNA-Seq experiment. Topics to be discussed will include:
* Experimental Design of RNA-Seq experiment
* Sample preparation, best practices
* High throughput sequencing basics and choices
* Cost estimation
* Differential Gene Expression Analysis
* Data cleanup and quality assurance
* Mapping your data
* Assigning reads to genes and counting
* Analysis of differentially expressed genes
* Downstream analysis/visualizations and tables
RNA Sequence data analysis,Transcriptome sequencing, Sequencing steady state RNA in a sample is known as RNA-Seq. It is free of limitations such as prior knowledge about the organism is not required.
RNA-Seq is useful to unravel inaccessible complexities of transcriptomics such as finding novel transcripts and isoforms.
Data set produced is large and complex; interpretation is not straight forward.
Machine Learning - Accuracy and Confusion MatrixAndrew Ferlitsch
Abstract: This PDSG workshop introduces basic concepts on measuring accuracy of your trained model. Concepts covered are loss functions and confusion matrices.
Level: Fundamental
Requirements: No prior programming or statistics knowledge required.
Ways to evaluate a machine learning model’s performanceMala Deep Upadhaya
Some of the ways to evaluate a machine learning model’s performance.
In Summary:
Confusion matrix: Representation of the True positives (TP), False positives (FP), True negatives (TN), False negatives (FN)in a matrix format.
Accuracy: Worse happens when classes are imbalanced.
Precision: Find the answer of How much the model is right when it says it is right!
Recall: Find the answer of How many extra right ones, the model missed when it showed the right ones!
Specificity: Like Recall but the shift is on the negative instances.
F1 score: Is the harmonic mean of precision and recall so the higher the F1 score, the better.
Precision-Recall or PR curve: Curve between precision and recall for various threshold values.
ROC curve: Graph is plotted against TPR and FPR for various threshold values.
Depth-first search (DFS) is an algorithm for traversing or searching tree or graph data structures. The algorithm starts at the root node (selecting some arbitrary node as the root node in the case of a graph) and explores as far as possible along each branch before backtracking
Problem solving
Problem formulation
Search Techniques for Artificial Intelligence
Classification of AI searching Strategies
What is Search strategy ?
Defining a Search Problem
State Space Graph versus Search Trees
Graph vs. Tree
Problem Solving by Search
Most existing approaches to Twitter sentiment analysis assume that sentiment is explicitly expressed through affective words. Nevertheless, sentiment is often implicitly expressed via latent semantic relations, patterns and dependencies among words in tweets. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that automatically captures patterns of words of similar contextual semantics and sentiment in tweets. Unlike previous work on sentiment pattern extraction, our proposed approach does not rely on external and fixed sets of syntactical templates/patterns, nor requires deep analyses of the syntactic structure of sentences in tweets.
We evaluate our approach with tweet- and entity-level sentiment analysis tasks by using the extracted semantic patterns as classification features in both tasks. We use 9 Twitter datasets in our evaluation and compare the performance of our patterns against 6 state-of-the-art baselines. Results show that our patterns consistently outperform all other baselines on all datasets by 2.19% at the tweet-level and 7.5% at the entity-level in average F-measure.
Sentiment lexicons for sentiment analysis offer a simple, yet effective way to obtain the prior sentiment information of opinionated words in texts. However, words' sentiment orientations and strengths often change throughout various contexts in which the words appear. In this paper, we propose a lexicon adaptation approach that uses the contextual semantics of words to capture their contexts in tweet messages and update their prior sentiment orientations and/or strengths accordingly. We evaluate our approach on one state-of-the-art sentiment lexicon using three different Twitter datasets. Results show that the sentiment lexicons adapted by our approach outperform the original lexicon in accuracy and F-measure in two datasets, but give similar accuracy and slightly lower F-measure in one dataset.
Sentiment analysis using naive bayes classifier Dev Sahu
This ppt contains a small description of naive bayes classifier algorithm. It is a machine learning approach for detection of sentiment and text classification.
SentiTweet is a sentiment analysis tool for identifying the sentiment of the tweets as positive, negative and neutral.SentiTweet comes to rescue to find the sentiment of a single tweet or a set of tweets. Not only that it also enables you to find out the sentiment of the entire tweet or specific phrases of the tweet.
Make a query regarding a topic of interest and come to know the sentiment for the day in pie-chart or for the week in form of line-chart for the tweets gathered from twitter.com
Lexicon-based approaches to Twitter sentiment analysis are gaining much popularity due to their simplicity, domain independence, and relatively good performance. These approaches rely on sentiment lexicons, where a collection of words are marked with fixed sentiment polarities. However, words' sentiment orientation (positive, neural, negative) and/or sentiment strengths could change depending on context and targeted entities. In this paper we present SentiCircle; a novel lexicon-based approach that takes into account the contextual and conceptual semantics of words when calculating their sentiment orientation and strength in Twitter. We evaluate our approach on three Twitter datasets using three different sentiment lexicons. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms two lexicon baselines. Results are competitive but inconclusive when comparing to state-of-art SentiStrength, and vary from one dataset to another. SentiCircle outperforms SentiStrength in accuracy on average, but falls marginally behind in F-measure.
With the growth of computer networking, electronic commerce and web services, security networking systems have become very important to protect infomation and networks againts malicious usage or attacks. In this report, it is designed an Intrusion Detection System using two artificial neural networks: one for Intrusion Detection and the another for Attack Classification.
Sentiment analysis over Twitter offers organisations and individuals a fast and effective way to monitor the publics' feelings towards them and their competitors. To assess the performance of sentiment analysis methods over Twitter a small set of evaluation datasets have been released in the last few years. In this paper we present an overview of eight publicly available and manually annotated evaluation datasets for Twitter sentiment analysis. Based on this review, we show that a common limitation of most of these datasets, when assessing sentiment analysis at target (entity) level, is the lack of distinctive sentiment annotations among the tweets and the entities contained in them. For example, the tweet ``I love iPhone, but I hate iPad'' can be annotated with a mixed sentiment label, but the entity iPhone within this tweet should be annotated with a positive sentiment label. Aiming to overcome this limitation, and to complement current evaluation datasets, we present STS-Gold, a new evaluation dataset where tweets and targets (entities) are annotated individually and therefore may present different sentiment labels. This paper also provides a comparative study of the various datasets along several dimensions including: total number of tweets, vocabulary size and sparsity. We also investigate the pair-wise correlation among these dimensions as well as their correlations to the sentiment classification performance on different datasets.
Twitter has brought much attention recently as a hot research topic in the domain of sentiment analysis. Training sentiment classifiers from tweets data often faces the data sparsity problem partly due to the large variety of short and irregular forms introduced to tweets because of the 140-character limit. In this work we propose using two different sets of features to alleviate the data sparseness problem. One is the semantic feature set where we extract semantically hidden concepts from tweets and then incorporate them into classifier training through interpolation. Another is the sentiment-topic feature set where we extract latent topics and the associated topic sentiment from tweets, then augment the original feature space with these sentiment-topics. Experimental results on the Stanford Twitter Sentiment Dataset show that both feature sets outperform the baseline model using unigrams only. Moreover, using semantic features rivals the previously reported best result. Using sentiment-topic features achieves 86.3% sentiment classification accuracy, which outperforms existing approaches.
Introduction to Language and Linguistics 006: Syntax & Semantics (the interface)Meagan Louie
Introduction to Language and Linguistics 006: Syntax & Semantics - In which we review Phrase Structure Rules and discuss how constituency tests can be used to motivate particular PSRs. We also discuss the semantic difference between morpheme concatenation vs compounding - i.e., systematic/predictable vs non-systematic/predictable compositional meaning. We then review the basic semantic concepts introduced in week 4 (truth-conditions and reference), and formalize these in terms of a semantic ontology. This is all done for the purpose of observing that our PSRs/constituents are associated with a systematic/predictable interpretation - i.e., that each PSR can be associated with a semantic interpretation/composition rules. These semantic patterns can only be accounted for if we assume a hierarchical, as opposed to flat, structure. (Or, this could just be my way of trying to relevantly sneak compositional semantics into an intro-level course)
Supervised Learning Based Approach to Aspect Based Sentiment AnalysisTharindu Kumara
Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) systems receive as input a set of texts (e.g., product reviews) discussing a particular entity (e.g., a new model of a laptop). The systems attempt to
identify the main (e.g., the most frequently discussed) aspects (features) of the entity (e.g., battery, screen) and to estimate the average sentiment of the texts per aspect (e.g., how positive or negative the opinions are on average for each aspect).
Social media & sentiment analysis splunk conf2012Michael Wilde
This presentation was delivered at Splunk's User Conference (conf2012). It covers info about social media data, how to index / use it with Splunk and a lot of content around Sentiment Analysis.
Background:
Cochrane Systematic Reviews rely on the efficient identification of research evidence, specifically evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The largest single source of reports of RCTs is the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library. CENTRAL is mainly populated with records from MEDLINE, but also contains a substantial and growing number of records from Embase. The objective was to develop a new bespoke search filter to identify reports of RCTs and novel methods to assess the high volume of candidate reports resulting from the filter.
Methods: We developed, validated and refined a sensitive search filter to identify reports of RCTs in Embase. This filter was developed using textual analysis of ten gold standard sets of RCT records (totalling 10,000 records over ten years). The filter performance was tested on a second set of 10,000 RCT reports. Once implemented, records retrieved by the filter were assessed for relevance by a novel crowdsource approach. The search filter was refined after one year of operation based on an assessment of the records rejected by the crowd.
Results: The development of the search filter and the analysis of output from Embase has resulted in a tiered assessment process, where the most obvious RCT reports are fast-tracked for publication in CENTRAL, leaving more capacity to assess the relevance of less obvious candidate records. Over a 15-month period the filter has identified 198,960 records and 55,042 reports of RCTs have been added to CENTRAL (precision 28%).
Conclusions: The records identified by the filter and the crowdsource process have made many thousands of reports of RCTs that were unique to Embase, available in CENTRAL at a high level of precision. These RCTs might be otherwise inaccessible to Cochrane authors since many of them may not have access to Embase.
Multimedia Geocoding: The RECOD 2014 Approachmultimediaeval
This work describes the approach proposed by the RECOD
team for the Placing Task of MediaEval 2014. This task
requires the definition of automatic schemes to assign geographical locations to images and videos. Our approach is based on the use of as much evidences as possible (textual, visual, and/or audio descriptors) to geocode a given image/video. We estimate the location of test items by clustering the geographic coordinates of top-ranked items in one or more ranked lists declined in terms of different criteria.
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1263/mediaeval2014_submission_81.pdf
Esophageal Speech Recognition using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)Saibur Rahman
Esophageal Speech Recognition using Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In our presentation shows that how to recognize normal speech and Esophageal speech using ANN. We compared our method with other methods and show that our method is better then other method.
This webinar will provide pesticides residue analysts with valuable information on the development and optimization of chromatographic separations and mass spectrometry methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in food. The expert speakers will share their knowledge in understanding the critical aspects of the method, assisting analysts in optimizing their methods for the most challenging analyses.
Marketing Research Project on T test and Sample Designing, Detail Analysis of all the aspect of T test and usage of all the tools for finding out the different variants.
Multi-Domain Diversity Preservation to Mitigate Particle Stagnation and Enab...Weiyang Tong
This paper makes important advancements to a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm that seeks to address the major complex attributes of engineering optimization problems, namely multiple objectives, high nonlinearity, high dimensionality, constraints, and mixed-discrete variables. To introduce these capabilities while keeping PSO competitive with other powerful multi-objective algorithms (e.g., NSGA-II, SPEA, and PAES), it is important to not only preserve population diversity (for mitigating stagnation), but also explicit diversity preservation to facilitate improved converge of (non-convex) Pareto frontiers. A new multi-domain preservation technique is presented in this paper for this purpose. In this technique, an adoptive repulsion is applied to each global leader to slow down the clustering of particles overly popular global leaders, and maintain a desirably even distribution of Pareto optimal solutions. In addition, the global leader selection is now modified to follow a stochastic solution based on a half Gaussian distribution. Specifically, two different population diversity measures are explored: (i) based on the smallest hypercube enclosing the entire population, and (ii) based on the smallest hypercube enclosing the subset of particles following each of the global leaders. Both strategies are investigated using a suite of benchmark problems. The performance of the new PSO algorithm is compared with other algorithms in terms of convergence measure, uniformity measure, and computation time.
Classifying Non-Referential It for Question Answer PairsJinho Choi
This paper introduces a new corpus, QA-It, for the classification of non-referential it. Our dataset is unique in a sense that it is annotated on question answer pairs collected from multiple genres, useful for developing advanced QA systems. Our annotation scheme makes clear distinctions between 4 types of it, providing guidelines for many erroneous cases. Several statistical models are built for the classification of it, showing encouraging results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such a corpus is created for question answering.
Making sense of citizen science data: A review of methodsolivier gimenez
My talk at International Congress for Conservation Biology 2015, in Montpellier.
Data collected through citizen science programs allow addressing many important questions in conservation biology related, e.g., to the shift in species range, the ecology of infectious disease or the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on biodiversity. However, citizen science data are subject to serious statistical challenges when it comes to their analysis and the reliable extraction of the information they contain, mainly due to sampling biases generated by variation in the observation process. Numerous methods have been proposed to address this issue that can be split into two main strategies: either a new approach is developed to deal with a specific problem or an existing approach is used pending some pre-treatment of the data or post-processing of the results. I review these various methods, trying to make the links between them and emphasizing their advantages and drawbacks with respect to the question. I illustrate my talk with case studies drawn for the research conducted in our group, mainly on large carnivores. Based on this review, I end up this contribution by recommendations on the use of existing methods and by suggesting perspectives on future developments.
Similar to On Stopwords, Filtering and Data Sparsity for Sentiment Analysis of Twitter (20)
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...Studia Poinsotiana
I Introduction
II Subalternation and Theology
III Theology and Dogmatic Declarations
IV The Mixed Principles of Theology
V Virtual Revelation: The Unity of Theology
VI Theology as a Natural Science
VII Theology’s Certitude
VIII Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
All the contents are fully attributable to the author, Doctor Victor Salas. Should you wish to get this text republished, get in touch with the author or the editorial committee of the Studia Poinsotiana. Insofar as possible, we will be happy to broker your contact.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
On Stopwords, Filtering and Data Sparsity for Sentiment Analysis of Twitter
1. On Stopwords, Filtering and Data Sparsity for
Sentiment Analysis of Twitter
Hassan Saif, Miriam Fernandez, Yulan He and Harith Alani
Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University,
Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
The 9th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation
Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland
3. “Sentiment analysis is the task of identifying
positive and negative opinions, emotions and
evaluations in text”
3
The main dish was
delicious
It is a Syrian dish
The main dish was
salty and horrible
Opinion OpinionFact
Sentiment Analysis
7. Stopwords Removal in Twitter Sentiment Analysis
- Kouloumpis et al. 2011
- Pak & Paroubek, 2010
- Asiaee et al., 2012
- Bollen et al., 2011
- Bifet and Frank, 2010
- Speriosu et al., 2011
- Zhang & Yuan, 2013
- Gokulakrishnan et al 2012
- Saif et al., 2012
- Hu et al., 2013
- Camara et al., 2013
Removing
Stopwords
is USEFUL
NOYES
8. • Precompiled
• Very popular
• Outdated
• Domain-
Independent
Classic Stopword Lists
9. • Unsupervised Methods
– Term Frequency
– Term-based Random Sampling
• Supervised
– Term Entropy Measures
– Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Automatic Stopwords Generation Methods
12. Stopword Analysis Set-Up (2)
Stopwords Removal Methods
1. The Baseline Method
– (non removal of stopwords)
1. The Classic Method
– This method is based on removing stopwords
obtained from pre-compiled lists
– Van Stoplist
13. Stopword Analysis Set-Up (3)
Stopwords Removal Methods
3. Methods based on Zipf’s
Law
- TF-High Method
Removing most frequent
- TF1 Method
Removing singleton words (i.e.,
words that occur once in tweets)
- IDF Method
Removing words with low inverse
document frequency (IDF)
14. Stopword Analysis Set-Up (4)
Stopwords Removal Methods
4. Term-based Random Sampling (TBRS)
5. The Mutual Information Method (MI)
15. Stopword Analysis Set-Up (5)
Twitter Sentiment Classifiers
– Two Supervised Classifiers:
• Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt)
• Naïve Bayes (NB)
– Measure the performance in Accuracy and F1
measure
– 10 fold cross validation
16. Experimental Results
Assess the impact of removing
stopwords by observing fluctuations on:
- Classification Performance
- Feature space
- Data Sparsity
17. Experimental Results (1)
1. Classification Performance
70
75
80
85
90
95
OMD HCR STS-Gold SemEval WAB GASP
Accuracy(%)
MaxEnt NB
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
OMD HCR STS-Gold SemEval WAB GASP
F1(%)
MaxEnt NB
The baseline classification performance in Accuracy and F-measure
of MaxEnt and NB classifiers across all datasets
Accuracy F-Measure
18. Experimental Results (2)
1. Classification Performance
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Baseline Classic TF1 TF-High IDF TBRS MI
Accuracy(%)
MaxEnt NB
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
Baseline Classic TF1 TF-High IDF TBRS MIF1(%)
MaxEnt NB
Accuracy F-Measure
Average Accuracy and F-measure of MaxEnt and NB classifiers using
different stoplists
19. Experimental Results (3)
2. Feature Space
0.00
5.50
65.24
0.82
11.22
6.06
19.34
Baseline Classic TF1 TF-High IDF TBRS MI
Reduction rate on the feature space of
the various stoplists
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OMD HCR STS-Gold SemEval WAB GASP
TF=1 TF>1
The number of singleton words to the number
non singleton words in all datasets
20. Experimental Results (4)
3. Data Sparsity
0.98800
0.99000
0.99200
0.99400
0.99600
0.99800
1.00000
Baseline Classic TF1 TF-High IDF TBRS MI
SparsityDegree
OMD HCR STS-Gold SemEval WAB GASP
Stoplist impact on the sparsity degree of all datasets
21. The Ideal Stoplist (1)
• The ideal stopword removal method is the
one which:
– Helps maintaining a high classification
performance,
– Leads to shrinking the classifier’s feature space
– Reduces the data sparseness
– Has low runtime and storage complexity
– Has minimal human supervision
22. The Ideal Stoplist (2)
Average accuracy, F1, reduction rate on feature space and data sparsity of the six stoplist
methods. Positive sparsity values refer to an increase in the sparsity degree while negative
values refer to a decrease in the sparsity degree.
Overall Analysis Results
23. Conclusion
• We studied how six different stopword removal methods
affect the sentiment polarity classification on Twitter.
• The use of pre-compiled (classic) Stoplist has a negative
impact on the classification performance.
• TF1 stopword removal method is the one that obtains the
best trade-off:
– Reducing the feature space by nearly 65%,
– Decreasing the data sparsity degree up to 0.37%, and
– Maintaining a high classification performance.
Editor's Notes
Hi everyone,
My name is Hassan Saif, a PhD student KMI in UK.
Today I’m gonna present our work on Evaluation datasets for Twitter Sentiment Analysis.. Surveying the pre-existed datasets and proposing a new dataset. the STS-Gold.
I’m gonna start with some basic definitions about the sentiment analysis task on Twitter. then talking about the motivation behind our study.
Next I will give a quick overview about the existed evaluation datasets and preseting our new dataset the STS-Gold.
Afterwards I’m gonna talk talk about the our results obtained from a comparative study we conducted on the these datasets.
Our study is three main parts: in the first part I’m gonna give an overview of some of the most widely used evaluation datasets for Twitter sentiment analysis, pointing out their limitation
In the second part I’m gonna present our new gold standard dataset which overcome some of the limitations of the pre-existed datasets
The third part is about a comparative study we performed on the all the datasets in terms of 4 different aspects.
Early work on Sentiment analysis focused mainly on extracting sentiment from conventional text such as movie reviews, blogs, news articles and open forums
Textual content in these type of media sources is linguistically rich, consists of well structured and formal sentences, and discusses specific topic or domain (e.g., movie reviews)
However, with the emergent of social media networks and microblogging platforms, especially Twitter, research interests shifted to analyzing and extracting sentiment from theses new sources.
Nevertheless, One of the key challenges that Twitter sentiment analysis methods have to confront is the noisy nature of Twitter generated data. Twitter allows only for 140 characters in each post, which influences the use of abbreviations, irregular expressions and infrequent words.
This phenomena increases the level of data sparsity, affecting the performance of Twitter sentiment classifiers
A well known method to reduce the noise of textual data is the removal of stopwords. This method is based on the idea that discarding non-discriminative words reduces the feature space of the classifiers and helps them to produce more accurate results
This pre-processing method, widely used in the literature of document classification and retrieval, has been applied to Twitter in the context of sentiment analysis obtaining contradictory results.
While some works support their removal (RED Box), others claim that stopwords in- deed carry sentiment information and removing them harms the performance of Twitter sentiment classifiers
In addition, most of the works that have applied stopword removal for Twitter sentiment classification use pre-compiled stopwords lists, such as the Van stoplist
However, these stoplists have been criticized for:
being outdated (a phenomena that may affect specially Twitter data, where new information and terms are continuously emerging)
(ii) for not accounting for the specificities of the domain under analysis since non-discriminative words in some domain or corpus may have discriminative power in different domain.
Aiming to solve these limitations several approaches have emerged in the areas of document retrieval and classification that aim to dynamically build stopword lists from the corpus under analysis.
These approaches measure the discriminative power of terms by using different methods including
Unsupervised methods such as those based on the terms’ frequencies or
Supervised methods such as term entropy measures and Maximum Likelihood Estimation
In our work, we studied the effect of different stopword removal methods for polarity classification of tweets and whether removing stopwords affects the performance of Twitter sentiment classifiers.
To this end, we use six Twitter datasets obtained from the literature of Twitter sentiment classification.
As can be noted, these datasets have different size and different number of positive and negative tweets.
The Baseline method for this analysis is the non removal of stopwords.
We also assess the influence of six different stopword removal methods using six stopwords removal methods including:
The Classic Method: which is based on removing stopwords obtained from pre-compiled lists. In our analysis we use the classic Van stoplist
In addition to the classic Stoplist, we use three stopword generation methods inspired by Zipf’s law including: removing most frequent words (TF-High) and removing words that occur once, i.e. singleton words (TF1). We also consider re- moving words with low inverse document frequency (IDF).
4- Term-based Random Sampling :
This method works by iterating over separate chunks of data ran- domly selected. It then ranks terms in each chunk based on their informativeness values using the Kullback-Leibler divergence measure
5- The Mutual Information Method:
The mutual information method (MI) is a supervised method that works by computing the mutual information between a given term and a document class (e.g., positive, negative), providing an indication of how much in- formation the term can tell about a given class. Low mutual information suggests that the term has low discrimination power and hence it should be easily removed.
To assess the effect of stopwords in sentiment classification we use two of the most popular supervised classifiers used in the literature of sentiment analysis, Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) and Naive Bayes (NB) from Mallet.
We report the performance of both classifiers in accuracy and aver- age F-measure using a 10-fold cross validation. Also, note that we use unigram features to train both classifiers in our experiments.
We assess the impact of removing stopwords by observing fluctuations (increases and decreases) on three different as- pects of the sentiment classification task:
the classification performance, measured in terms of accuracy and F-masure, the size of the classifier’s feature space and the level of data sparsity.
Our baseline for comparison is not removing stopwords.
The first aspect that we study is how removing stopwords affects the classification performance
This figure shows the baseline classification performance in accuracy (a) and F-measure (b) for the MaxEnt and NB classifiers across all the datasets.
As we can see, when no stopwords are removed, the MaxEnt classifier always outperforms the NB classifier in accuracy and F1 measure on all datasets.
This figure shows the average performances in accuracy and F-measure obtained from the MaxEnt and NB classifiers by using the six stopword removal methods on all datasets
- Here we notice a significant loss in accuracy and in F-measure is encountered when using the IDF stoplist, while the highest performance is always obtained when using the MI stoplist.
Also, using the classic stoplist gives lower performance than the baseline with an average loss of 1.04% and 1.24% in accuracy and F-measure respectively
On the contrary, removing singleton words (the TF1 stoplist) improves the accuracy by 1.15% and F-measure by 2.65% compared to the classic stoplist.
We also notice that the TF1 stoplist gives slightly lower accuracy and F-measure than the MI stoplist respectively. Nonetheless, generating TF1 stoplists is much simpler than generating the MI ones in the sense that the former, as opposed to the latter, does not required any labelled data.
Finally, it seems that NB is more sensitive to removing stopwords than MaxEnt. NB faces more dramatic changes in accuracy than MaxEnt across the different stoplists.
The second aspect we study is the average reduction rate on the classifier’s feature space caused by each of the studied stopword removal methods
- As we can see, Removing singleton words reduces the feature space substantially by 65.24%. MI comes next with a reduction rate of 19.34%. On the other hand, removing the most frequent words (TF-High) has no actual effect on the feature space. All other stoplists reduces the number of features by less than 12%.
- From the figure on the right, we can observe that singleton words constitute two-thirds of the vocabulary size of all datasets. In other words, the ratio of singleton words to non singleton words is two to one for all datasets. This two-to-one ratio explains the large reduction rate in the feature space when removing singleton words.
The third aspect we study is the reduction on the data sparseness caused by our 6 stopwords removal methods on all datasets.
Previous work on Sentiment analysis showed that Twitter Twitter data are sparser than other types of data (e.g., movie review data) due to the large number of infrequent words present within tweets. Therefore, an important effect of a stoplist for Twitter sentiment analysis is to help in reducing the sparsity degree of the data.
Our analysis showed that our Twitter datasets are very sparse indeed, where the average sparsity degree of the baseline is 0.997.
Compared to the baseline, using the TF1 method lowers the sparsity degree on all datasets by 0.37% on average. On the other hand, the effect of the TBRS stoplists is barely noticeable
Also All other stopword removal methods in- crease the sparsity effect with different degrees, including the classic, TF-High, IDF and MI.
After our evaluation, the question remains – What is the best or the ideal stopword method for Sentiment analysis on Twitter?
Broadly speaking, the ideal stopword removal method is the one which helps maintaining a high classification performance, leads to shrinking the classifier’s feature space and effectively reducing the data sparseness. Moreover, since Twitter operates in streaming fashion (i.e., millions of tweets are generated, sent and discarded instantly), the ideal stoplist method is required to have low runtime and storage complexity and to cope with the continuous shift in the sentiment class distribution in tweets. Lastly and most importantly, the human supervision factor (e.g., threshold setup, data annotation, manual validation, etc.) in the method’s workflow should be minimal.
- This table shows the average performances of the evaluated stoplist methods in terms of the sentiment classification accuracy and F-measure, reduction on the feature space and the data sparseness, and the type of the human supervision required.
- According to these results, the MI and the TF1 methods show very competitive performances comparing to other methods; the MI method comes first in accuracy and F1 measure while the TF1 method outperform all other methods in the amount of reduction on feature space and data sparseness.
looking at the human supervision factor, the TF1 method seems a simpler and more effective choice than the MI method. Firstly, because the notion behind TF1 is rather simple - “stopwords are those which occur once in tweets”, and hence, the computational complexity of generating TF1 stoplists is generally low. Secondly, the TF1 method is fully unsupervised while the MI method needs two major human supervisions including: (i) deciding on the size of the generated stoplists, which is usually done empirically and (ii) manually annotating tweet messages with their sentiment class label in order to calculate the informativeness values of terms as described in Equation 2.