The document summarizes talent management and development metrics for AIESEC India over a 5 month period. It finds that 539 members were lost over 2 months, with low retention rates across programs. Most teams do not meet minimum requirements like having a team purpose or monthly coaching. Over 60% of total members are not productive, and there are inconsistencies with how data is collected and analyzed across locations. Areas that need improvement include recruitment quality, member fulfillment, productivity, and learning development standards.

1. State of the National Association
Talent Management | Learning and Development
Principles to follow:
✓ Be wary of intellectual arrogance
✓ Have you heard of growth mindset?

2. WARNING
Talent Management | Learning and Development
Late Submissions:
• Thapar
• Chandigarh
• Hyderabad
• Lucknow
• Jaipur
• Dehradun
• Delhi IIT
Not Submitted/ Incomplete
• Baroda
• Surat
• Mumbai
• Jodhpur

3. MC Update
Associate Membership:
Associate Membership,
produced
210TMP
Associate Membership,
produced
But is it all worth it?
110oGCDP

4. ON 5 MOS
ANALYSIS
FOCUSING
FOR
TALENT
MEMBER
RETENTION
% OF TMP THAT IS
PRODUCTIVE
AVERAGE
PRODUCTIVITY
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM
MINIMUMS
% OF VALID PEOPLE
ANALYTICS

5. I n M a r c h a n d A p r i l ,
AIESEC India
r e c r u i t e d
1300TMP
MEMBER
RETENTION
800and we had
p i p e l i n e

6. I n M a r c h a n d A p r i l ,
AIESEC India
r e c r u i t e d
1300TMP
800and we had
p i p e l i n e
Now,
AIESEC
I n d i a h a s1 5 6 2 TMP
MEMBER
RETENTION

7. 539 W e l o s t
members in
2 m o n t h s .
MEMBER
RETENTION

8. 70% under 75% under
oGCDP Newie Retention Rate
iGCDP Newie Retention Rate
59% under 69% under
oGIP Newie Retention Rate iGIP Newie Retention Rate
MEMBER
RETENTION

9. MEMBER
RETENTION
“Is this even
accurate?”

10. 539
WHY?
MEMBER
RETENTION

11. % OF VALID PEOPLE
ANALYTICS
“How can we ensure that we increase our
“How can we reentseunrteio tnh irsa tdea?t”a is accurate?”

12. 300
240
180
120
60
0
JNC Audit
May Audit
Team Member Program Statistics on the
system

13. MEMBER
RETENTION
“How can we ensure that we increase our
retention rate?”
GET KEEP CONTRIBUTE

14. “How can we ensure that we increase our
retention rate?”
ARE WE RECRUITING
THE RIGHT PEOPLE?
ARE WE FULFILLING
TEAM MINIMUMS?
ARE OUR MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?
MEMBER
RETENTION

15. AVERAGE
PRODUCTIVITY
1562
IGCDP
303
I G I P
240
OGCDP
269
OGIP
AR E OUR 1 2 2
MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?

16. AVERAGE
PRODUCTIVITY
1562
IGCDP
303
I G I P
240
OGCDP
269
OGIP
122
2180
RA
3.64
ARE OUR
MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?
2 1 8 0
R A
1105
MA
6 2 7
R A 304 MA 1.26
7 5 3
R A 757 MA 2.79
1 5 5
R A 53 MA 0.43

17. AVERAGE
PRODUCTIVITY
1 . 4 6
ARE OUR
MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?
4

18. Out of 1562 TMP,
937 TMP
a r e n o t -
p e r f o r m i n g .
% OF TMP THAT IS
PRODUCTIVE
625performing
and we have
ARE OUR
MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?

19. of iGCDP is not
performing
of oGCDP is not
performing
% OF TMP THAT IS
PRODUCTIVE
ARE OUR
MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?
of iGIP is not
performing
of oGIP is not
performing

20. % OF TMP THAT IS
PRODUCTIVE
ARE OUR
MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?

21. % OF TMP THAT IS
PRODUCTIVE
What is the hindering our productivity?
The problem is not with increasing
productivity, it’s about making more people
productive.
How should you calculate the productivity of
back office? ARE OUR
MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVE?

22. ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM
MINIMUMS
30% OF THE
TEAMS IN
AIESEC INDIA
HAVE A TEAM
PURPOSE
14% OF TEAM
LEADERS GIVE
MONTHLY
COACHING CHATS
8% OF OF TEAMS
HAVE REFLECTION
ARE WE
FULFILLING
TEAM
MINIMUMS

23. TEAM MINIMUMS
85% 0 14% 8%
1
2
3
Reflection
5
7
6
Team
Plan
JD
4
Training
Tracking & Coaching
Evaluation
54% 60% 45%

24. ACHIEVEMENT OF
TEAM MINIMUMS
AIESEC INDIA
DOEN’T HAVE
PROPER JDS FOR
ANYONE

25. % OF VALID PEOPLE
ANALYTICS
No LC’s submitted accurate Talent
Management data during Audits

26. ON 5 MOS
ANALYSIS
FOCUSING
FOR
TALENT
MEMBER
RETENTION
% OF TMP THAT IS
PRODUCTIVE
AVERAGE
PRODUCTIVITY
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM
MINIMUMS
% OF VALID PEOPLE
ANALYTICS

27. Parameters:
MEMBER
RETENTION
% OF TMP THAT IS
PRODUCTIVE
AVERAGE
PRODUCTIVITY
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM
MINIMUMS
% OF VALID PEOPLE
ANALYTICS
SUSTAINABILITY
FACTORS: % of seniors
VPTM PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT

28. LC
5 MOS
STANDINGS FOR
TALENT

29. % OF VALID PEOPLE
ANALYTICS
Top performers in Yellow
KOLKATA
DEHRADUN
HYDERABAD
DELHI
UNIVERSITY

30. LEAD PROCESS IS
HAPHAZARD ACROSS
COMMISSION
NO TRAINING SKILLS
IN ANY LC
TRAINING SCHEDULES
NOT ALIGNED TO
EXCHANGE PEAK
LEARNING AND
DEVELOPMENT
LEAD LEARNING

35. W e l o s t
539
members in 2
months.
OGIP
122 155 RA 53 MA 0.43
59% under
55% o v e r
30% OF THE
TEAMS IN
AIESEC INDIA
HAVE A TEAM
PURPOSE

36. EVERY MEMBER MATTERS
TA1ENT
EVERY MEMBER IS IMPORTANT

37. EVERY MEMBER MATTERS
TA1ENT
EVERY MEMBER IS IMPORTANT