PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
marco soligo
Azienda Ospedaliera
Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento
Ospedale di rilievo nazionale e di alta specializzazione convenzionato con l’Università degli Studi di Milano
Ospedale dei Bambini V. Buzzi
Dipartimento della Donna, Mamma e Neonato
Direttore prof. Enrico Ferrazzi
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
To date we are unaware of any studies that have addressed how
often a posterior enterocele and or sigmoidocele coexist with a
rectocele and how the presence of these defects impacts on
ultimate surgical outcomes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep 5. pii: S0002-9378(15)01025-X. doi:
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.001. [Epub ahead of print]
Consistently Inconsistent, the Posterior Vaginal Wall.
Hale DS, Fenner D.
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Vaginal approach 99%
Native tissues 98.8%
Posterior repair
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
Traditional posterior colporraphy
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Success rate 83% (76%-96%)
Dyspareunia 18%
Defecatory dysfunction 17%
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Karram & Maher 2013
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
vs
Vaginal approach
Tansanal approach
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Vaginal approach Tansanal approach
vs
… which one the Outcome?
Vaginal bulging (POP)?
Functional: (Constipation/OD)?
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
Posterior Colporraphy vs Transanal surgery
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Further Surgery
(enterocele)
TA TV
Post. Vag. Prolapse
Ap
TA TV
Kahn et al 1999* 27% 8% -0.2 -1.4 -1.0 -1.4
57 pts. (f-up 25 m.os) p=0.10 p< 0.0001 p= 0.40
Author
Rectal Exam
TA TV
Nieminen et al. 2003# 67% 7% -1.36 -2.8
30 pts. (f-up 12 m.os) p=0.01 p=0.01
# No L.A. plication
Post. POP
TA TV
* L.A. plication
No Statistically Significant Difference for Ano-rectal Symptoms nor
Dyspareunia
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Farid et al 2010:
Transperineal (+ LA plication) vs Transanal
Rectocele Significant smaller on
defaecography
Functional outcome
(modified OD questionnaire)
better after transperineal repair
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Preoperative n.
(%)
Postoperative n.
(%)
Value of p
Constipation 64/115 (55%) 39/116 (34%) 0.002
Difficult stool passage 62/64(97%) 38/39 (97%) n.s
Mean Wexner’s score for
Constipation 11.9
10.4 n.s §
Anal Incontinence (A.I.) 25/107 (23%) 12/109 (11%) 0.019
Mean Wexner’s score for
A.I. 6,8 3.7
n.s. §
Sexually active 45/84 (53,6) 47/95 (49,5) n.s.
Dyspareunia 23/84 (27,4) 23/95 (24,2) n.s.
Soligo et al. ICS 2005Fisher’s exact test; § Student t-test
Functional aspects
116 pts. Mean age 64 y (35-
87); BMI 26
Mean F-Up 22 months (3-65)
Posterior vaginal repair
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Vaginal approach Tansanal approach
&
Combined
Success rate 71% (Defecography, 6 months)
Dyspareunia 41%
Van Dam et al 2000:
Transperineal (+ LA plication) vs Transanal
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
Site specific defect repair
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Author N pts F-Up Mean
Months
Anatomical
Efficacy %
Constip
Pre / Post %
A.I.
I Pre / Post %
DeNovo
dyspareunia
Cundiff et al 1998 69 12 82 46 /13 13 / 8 1 (2)
Porter et al 1999 125 6 82 60 /50 24 /21 3(4)
Kenton et al 1999 66 12 90 41/57 30 / - 3 (7)
Glavind & Madsen
2000
67 3 100 / / 2 (3)
Singh et al 2003 42 18 92 / 9 / 5 0
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
Posterior Colporraphy vs Site specific defect repair
(retrospective analysis)
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Posterior Colporrhaphy* 14% 4% -2.7
(183 pts.)
Discrete Site-Specific 33% 11%
-2.2
Defect Repair (124 pts.)
Rectocele
II
P= .001
Bp point
* Plication of the endopelvic connective tissues in the midline
307 women (F-up 1 year)
Abramov et al. 2005
P= .001
Rectocele
≥ III
P= .02
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
Prospective randomized trial
(F-up 1 year)
Post. Colporraphy
(37 pts)
Site specific repair
(37 pts)
Site specific repair +
biologic mesh
(32 pts)
Anatomical Failure rate
4/28 (14%)
6/27 (22%)
12/26 (46%)*
* Significantly different
No significant differences
in sexual & bowel
symptoms
Paraiso et al. 2006
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
Key points for surgery
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
• In patients with advanced prolapse and a widened genital
hiatus the only way to address the gaping vagina is to
routinely perform a distal levatorplasty.
•…aggressive reattachment of the uppermost portion of the full
thickness of the posterior vaginal wall (level III support) to the
uterosacral ligament provides significant support to the
posterior vaginal wall in patients with high rectoceles or
rectoceles in conjunction with a posterior enterocele.
Karram & Maher 2013
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
• Elytrorrhaphy:
• Posterior
colporrhaphy:
• Colpoperineorrhaphy
denudation and closure of
the posterior vaginal wall
Fricke JC 1833
more aggressive plication in
the inferior vaginal portion
Simon G 1867
Hegar 1870
Levator ani muscle
approximation in the
lower part of the vagina
PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE
Compartimento posteriore
Grazie
3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP
Treviso1-2Ottobre2015

PROLASSO E CHIRURGIA FASCIALE - Compartimento posteriore

  • 1.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore marco soligo Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento Ospedale di rilievo nazionale e di alta specializzazione convenzionato con l’Università degli Studi di Milano Ospedale dei Bambini V. Buzzi Dipartimento della Donna, Mamma e Neonato Direttore prof. Enrico Ferrazzi 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
  • 2.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 To date we are unaware of any studies that have addressed how often a posterior enterocele and or sigmoidocele coexist with a rectocele and how the presence of these defects impacts on ultimate surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep 5. pii: S0002-9378(15)01025-X. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.001. [Epub ahead of print] Consistently Inconsistent, the Posterior Vaginal Wall. Hale DS, Fenner D.
  • 3.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Vaginal approach 99% Native tissues 98.8% Posterior repair
  • 4.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore Traditional posterior colporraphy 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Success rate 83% (76%-96%) Dyspareunia 18% Defecatory dysfunction 17%
  • 5.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Karram & Maher 2013
  • 6.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 vs Vaginal approach Tansanal approach
  • 7.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Vaginal approach Tansanal approach vs … which one the Outcome? Vaginal bulging (POP)? Functional: (Constipation/OD)?
  • 8.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore Posterior Colporraphy vs Transanal surgery 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Further Surgery (enterocele) TA TV Post. Vag. Prolapse Ap TA TV Kahn et al 1999* 27% 8% -0.2 -1.4 -1.0 -1.4 57 pts. (f-up 25 m.os) p=0.10 p< 0.0001 p= 0.40 Author Rectal Exam TA TV Nieminen et al. 2003# 67% 7% -1.36 -2.8 30 pts. (f-up 12 m.os) p=0.01 p=0.01 # No L.A. plication Post. POP TA TV * L.A. plication No Statistically Significant Difference for Ano-rectal Symptoms nor Dyspareunia
  • 9.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Farid et al 2010: Transperineal (+ LA plication) vs Transanal Rectocele Significant smaller on defaecography Functional outcome (modified OD questionnaire) better after transperineal repair
  • 10.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Preoperative n. (%) Postoperative n. (%) Value of p Constipation 64/115 (55%) 39/116 (34%) 0.002 Difficult stool passage 62/64(97%) 38/39 (97%) n.s Mean Wexner’s score for Constipation 11.9 10.4 n.s § Anal Incontinence (A.I.) 25/107 (23%) 12/109 (11%) 0.019 Mean Wexner’s score for A.I. 6,8 3.7 n.s. § Sexually active 45/84 (53,6) 47/95 (49,5) n.s. Dyspareunia 23/84 (27,4) 23/95 (24,2) n.s. Soligo et al. ICS 2005Fisher’s exact test; § Student t-test Functional aspects 116 pts. Mean age 64 y (35- 87); BMI 26 Mean F-Up 22 months (3-65) Posterior vaginal repair
  • 11.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Vaginal approach Tansanal approach & Combined Success rate 71% (Defecography, 6 months) Dyspareunia 41% Van Dam et al 2000: Transperineal (+ LA plication) vs Transanal
  • 12.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore Site specific defect repair 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Author N pts F-Up Mean Months Anatomical Efficacy % Constip Pre / Post % A.I. I Pre / Post % DeNovo dyspareunia Cundiff et al 1998 69 12 82 46 /13 13 / 8 1 (2) Porter et al 1999 125 6 82 60 /50 24 /21 3(4) Kenton et al 1999 66 12 90 41/57 30 / - 3 (7) Glavind & Madsen 2000 67 3 100 / / 2 (3) Singh et al 2003 42 18 92 / 9 / 5 0
  • 13.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore Posterior Colporraphy vs Site specific defect repair (retrospective analysis) 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Posterior Colporrhaphy* 14% 4% -2.7 (183 pts.) Discrete Site-Specific 33% 11% -2.2 Defect Repair (124 pts.) Rectocele II P= .001 Bp point * Plication of the endopelvic connective tissues in the midline 307 women (F-up 1 year) Abramov et al. 2005 P= .001 Rectocele ≥ III P= .02
  • 14.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 Prospective randomized trial (F-up 1 year) Post. Colporraphy (37 pts) Site specific repair (37 pts) Site specific repair + biologic mesh (32 pts) Anatomical Failure rate 4/28 (14%) 6/27 (22%) 12/26 (46%)* * Significantly different No significant differences in sexual & bowel symptoms Paraiso et al. 2006
  • 15.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore Key points for surgery 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 • In patients with advanced prolapse and a widened genital hiatus the only way to address the gaping vagina is to routinely perform a distal levatorplasty. •…aggressive reattachment of the uppermost portion of the full thickness of the posterior vaginal wall (level III support) to the uterosacral ligament provides significant support to the posterior vaginal wall in patients with high rectoceles or rectoceles in conjunction with a posterior enterocele. Karram & Maher 2013
  • 16.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015
  • 17.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015 • Elytrorrhaphy: • Posterior colporrhaphy: • Colpoperineorrhaphy denudation and closure of the posterior vaginal wall Fricke JC 1833 more aggressive plication in the inferior vaginal portion Simon G 1867 Hegar 1870 Levator ani muscle approximation in the lower part of the vagina
  • 18.
    PROLASSO E CHIRURGIAFASCIALE Compartimento posteriore Grazie 3°CongressoNazionaleGLUP Treviso1-2Ottobre2015