Social Loafing (1979)
Definition:



 “Social loafing refers to the reduced efforts of individuals
  who act as part of a group rather than alone” (Latene et
  al., 1979, cited by Chang, 2008, p.3)
 Individuals within a group put less than 100% effort
  because of a lack of motivation.
Example



 Ringlemann Effect: Rope pulling study…as the number of
  group members increased, performance of individuals
  decreased.
Theory's
 Social Impact Theory: suggests that when individuals
  work collectively, social influence is diffused across group
  members, and each additional group member has less
  influence as group size increases.
 Arousal Reduction: follows a drive, which suggests that
  working collectively reduces arousal, thereby reducing
  performance on simple tasks but enhancing performance on
  complex tasks.
 Evaluation Approaches: suggest that evaluation may
  eliminate social loafing if the participants inputs are
  identifiable and if there is a standard with which these
  inputs can be compared.
 Dispensability Of Effort: suggests that working
  collectively reduces effort because people feel their input is
  not essential to a quality group product.
(Gill and Lavon, 2008, p. 247)
References


Chang, Y., (2008), Social loafing and moral emotions: The
Janus-headed aspect of moral identity, Deleware: University
of Deleware
Weinberg, R., Gould, D., (2007), Foundations of Sport and
Exercise Psychology, 4th edition, Leeds: Human Kinetics
Gill, D., Williams, L., (2008), Psychological Dynamics of
Sport and Exercise, 3rd edition, Leeds: Human Kinetics

Social loafing (1979)

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Definition:  “Social loafingrefers to the reduced efforts of individuals who act as part of a group rather than alone” (Latene et al., 1979, cited by Chang, 2008, p.3)  Individuals within a group put less than 100% effort because of a lack of motivation.
  • 3.
    Example  Ringlemann Effect:Rope pulling study…as the number of group members increased, performance of individuals decreased.
  • 4.
    Theory's  Social ImpactTheory: suggests that when individuals work collectively, social influence is diffused across group members, and each additional group member has less influence as group size increases.  Arousal Reduction: follows a drive, which suggests that working collectively reduces arousal, thereby reducing performance on simple tasks but enhancing performance on complex tasks.  Evaluation Approaches: suggest that evaluation may eliminate social loafing if the participants inputs are identifiable and if there is a standard with which these inputs can be compared.  Dispensability Of Effort: suggests that working collectively reduces effort because people feel their input is not essential to a quality group product. (Gill and Lavon, 2008, p. 247)
  • 5.
    References Chang, Y., (2008),Social loafing and moral emotions: The Janus-headed aspect of moral identity, Deleware: University of Deleware Weinberg, R., Gould, D., (2007), Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4th edition, Leeds: Human Kinetics Gill, D., Williams, L., (2008), Psychological Dynamics of Sport and Exercise, 3rd edition, Leeds: Human Kinetics