In this presentation I have mentioned whatever the possible relevant content/guidelines require for biowaiver application.
Citation Is done at the end of slide.
Content is up to date & true to my belief.
Thanks & Best Regards.
Anurag Pandey
B.Pharm (FACULTY OF PHARMACY, INVERTIS UNIVERSITY)
M.Pharm (INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY, NIRMA UNIVERSITY)
Email :- anurag.dmk05@gmail.com
PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS
Drug movement within the body is a complex process. The major objective is therefore to develop a generalized and simple approach to describe, analyse and interpret the data obtained during in vivo drug disposition studies.
The two major approaches in the quantitative study of various kinetic processes of drug disposition in the body are
Model approach, and
Model-independent approach (also called as non-compartmental analysis).
In this presentation I have mentioned whatever the possible relevant content/guidelines require for biowaiver application.
Citation Is done at the end of slide.
Content is up to date & true to my belief.
Thanks & Best Regards.
Anurag Pandey
B.Pharm (FACULTY OF PHARMACY, INVERTIS UNIVERSITY)
M.Pharm (INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY, NIRMA UNIVERSITY)
Email :- anurag.dmk05@gmail.com
PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS
Drug movement within the body is a complex process. The major objective is therefore to develop a generalized and simple approach to describe, analyse and interpret the data obtained during in vivo drug disposition studies.
The two major approaches in the quantitative study of various kinetic processes of drug disposition in the body are
Model approach, and
Model-independent approach (also called as non-compartmental analysis).
It is defined as “the predictive mathematical model that describes the relationship between in vitro property (such as rate & extent of dissolution) of a dosage form and in vivo response (such as plasma drug concentration or amount of drug absorbed)”.
Methods For Assesment Of Bioavailability Anindya Jana
Bioavailability means the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the site of action. For drug products that are not intended to be absorbed into the bloodstream, bioavailability may be assessed by measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety becomes available at the site of action.
Bioavailability studies are important in the Primary stages of development of a suitable dosage form for a new drug entity, determination of influence of excipients, patient related factors & possible interaction with other drugs on the efficiency of absorption, development of new formulations of the existing drugs, control of quality of a drug product during the early stages of marketing in order to determine the influence of processing factors, storage & stability on drug absorption
COATING PROCESS : PRINCIPLE : Tablet Coating is the process of a coating composition to a moving bed of tablets with the concurrent use of heated air to facilitate evaporation of solvent . The distribution of coating is accomplished by the movement of tablets either perpendicular or vertical to the application of the coating composition
1. Measurement of Bioavailability:
Direct and indirect methods may be used to assess drug bioavailability. The in-vivo bioavailability of a drug product is demonstrated by the rate and extent of drug absorption, as determined by comparison of measured parameters, e.g., concentration of the active drug ingredient in the blood, cumulative urinary excretion rates, or pharmacological effects.
For drug products that are not intended to be absorbed into the bloodstream, bioavailability may be assessed by measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety becomes available at the site of action.
The design of the bioavailability study depends on the objectives of the study, the ability to analyze the drug (and metabolites) in biological fluids, the pharmacodynamics of the drug substance, the route of drug administration, and the nature of the drug product.
Pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters as well as clinical observations and in-vitro studies may be used to determine drug bioavailability from a drug product.
1.1. Pharmacokinetic methods:
These are very widely used and based upon the assumption that the pharmacokinetic profile reflects the therapeutic effectiveness of a drug. Thus these are indirect methods. The two major pharmacokinetic methods are:
The major pharmacokinetic methods are:
Plasma / blood level time profile.
o Time for peak plasma (blood) concentration (t max)
o Peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax)
o Area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve (AUC)
Urinary excretion studies.
o Cumulative amount of drug excreted in the urine (Du)
o Rate of drug excretion in the urine (dDu/dt)
o Time for maximum urinary excretion (t)
C. Other biological fluids
1.2. Pharmacodynamic methods:
IT involves direct measurement of drug effect on a (patho) physiological process as a function of time. Disadvantages of it may be high variability, difficult to measure, limited choices, less reliable, more subjective, drug response influenced by several physiological & environmental factors.
They involve determination of bioavailability from:
Acute pharmacological response.
Therapeutic response.
1.3. In-vitro dissolution studies
Closed compartment apparatus
Open compartment apparatus
Dialysis systems.
1.4. Clinical observations
Well-controlled clinical trials
United State Pharmacopoeia (USP)The establishment of a rational relationship between a biological property, or a parameter derived from a biological property produced by a dosage form, and a physicochemical property or characteristic of the same dosage form.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) definitionIVIVC is a predictive mathematical model describing the relationship between an in vitro property of a dosage form and a relevant in vivo response. Generally, the in vitro property is the rate or extent of drug dissolution or release while the in vivo response is the plasma drug concentration or amount of drug absorbed.
Overcoming process development and biologics manufacturing challengesMaRS Discovery District
Speakers:
Tom Wellner and David Bell from Therapure Biopharma
Part of the Drug Development Discussion Group Event Series at MaRS. For more information, please visit: http://www.marsdd.com/Events/Event-Calendar/Drug-Development-Discussion-Group/therapure-05152009.html
It is defined as “the predictive mathematical model that describes the relationship between in vitro property (such as rate & extent of dissolution) of a dosage form and in vivo response (such as plasma drug concentration or amount of drug absorbed)”.
Methods For Assesment Of Bioavailability Anindya Jana
Bioavailability means the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the site of action. For drug products that are not intended to be absorbed into the bloodstream, bioavailability may be assessed by measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety becomes available at the site of action.
Bioavailability studies are important in the Primary stages of development of a suitable dosage form for a new drug entity, determination of influence of excipients, patient related factors & possible interaction with other drugs on the efficiency of absorption, development of new formulations of the existing drugs, control of quality of a drug product during the early stages of marketing in order to determine the influence of processing factors, storage & stability on drug absorption
COATING PROCESS : PRINCIPLE : Tablet Coating is the process of a coating composition to a moving bed of tablets with the concurrent use of heated air to facilitate evaporation of solvent . The distribution of coating is accomplished by the movement of tablets either perpendicular or vertical to the application of the coating composition
1. Measurement of Bioavailability:
Direct and indirect methods may be used to assess drug bioavailability. The in-vivo bioavailability of a drug product is demonstrated by the rate and extent of drug absorption, as determined by comparison of measured parameters, e.g., concentration of the active drug ingredient in the blood, cumulative urinary excretion rates, or pharmacological effects.
For drug products that are not intended to be absorbed into the bloodstream, bioavailability may be assessed by measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety becomes available at the site of action.
The design of the bioavailability study depends on the objectives of the study, the ability to analyze the drug (and metabolites) in biological fluids, the pharmacodynamics of the drug substance, the route of drug administration, and the nature of the drug product.
Pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters as well as clinical observations and in-vitro studies may be used to determine drug bioavailability from a drug product.
1.1. Pharmacokinetic methods:
These are very widely used and based upon the assumption that the pharmacokinetic profile reflects the therapeutic effectiveness of a drug. Thus these are indirect methods. The two major pharmacokinetic methods are:
The major pharmacokinetic methods are:
Plasma / blood level time profile.
o Time for peak plasma (blood) concentration (t max)
o Peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax)
o Area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve (AUC)
Urinary excretion studies.
o Cumulative amount of drug excreted in the urine (Du)
o Rate of drug excretion in the urine (dDu/dt)
o Time for maximum urinary excretion (t)
C. Other biological fluids
1.2. Pharmacodynamic methods:
IT involves direct measurement of drug effect on a (patho) physiological process as a function of time. Disadvantages of it may be high variability, difficult to measure, limited choices, less reliable, more subjective, drug response influenced by several physiological & environmental factors.
They involve determination of bioavailability from:
Acute pharmacological response.
Therapeutic response.
1.3. In-vitro dissolution studies
Closed compartment apparatus
Open compartment apparatus
Dialysis systems.
1.4. Clinical observations
Well-controlled clinical trials
United State Pharmacopoeia (USP)The establishment of a rational relationship between a biological property, or a parameter derived from a biological property produced by a dosage form, and a physicochemical property or characteristic of the same dosage form.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) definitionIVIVC is a predictive mathematical model describing the relationship between an in vitro property of a dosage form and a relevant in vivo response. Generally, the in vitro property is the rate or extent of drug dissolution or release while the in vivo response is the plasma drug concentration or amount of drug absorbed.
Overcoming process development and biologics manufacturing challengesMaRS Discovery District
Speakers:
Tom Wellner and David Bell from Therapure Biopharma
Part of the Drug Development Discussion Group Event Series at MaRS. For more information, please visit: http://www.marsdd.com/Events/Event-Calendar/Drug-Development-Discussion-Group/therapure-05152009.html
Vaccine Research with Marc LaForce (NPF Vaccine Webinar Series)Daric Snyder
We discuss the costs associated with research and the difficulty of safe manufacturing. Why are vaccine facilities so difficult to establish? Why are some diseases ignored? What new vaccines are in the pipeline, and how does the threat of bio-terrorism affect the nation’s vaccine agenda?
Special guest: Dr. Marc LaForce, Global Program Leader, Meningitis Vaccine Project, PATH
Production and purification of Viral vectors for gene and cell therapy appli...Dr. Priyabrata Pattnaik
Presentation at "2016 Osong BioExcellence - Renaissance in Immunotherapy" at South Korea, an event jointly hosted by Kbio Health and Merck on 6th October 2016.
Bio pharmaceutical classification System [BCS]Sagar Savale
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System was first developed by in 1995, by Amidon et al & his colleagues.
Definition:
“The Biopharmaceutical Classification System is a scientific framework for classifying a drug substance based on its aqueous solubility & intestinal permeability & dissolution rate”.
To saved time fast screening is required so drug substances are classified on basis of solubility and permeability. This classification is called Biopharmaceutical Classification System
The annual 2013 Pharmaceutical Industry Profile provides an overview of the sector, highlighting the latest medical advances, the impact of biopharmaceutical companies on the economy and the future of innovation.
Biopharmaceutical Process Development: Good Manufacturing Practices or Breaki...Chris Willmott
These are the slides from a presentation "Biopharmaceutical Process Development: Good Manufacturing Practices or Breaking Bad?" given by Andrew Warr as part of the 2015 Careers After Biological Sciences programme at the University of Leicester UK
Biosimilar a biological drug evaluation includes the biopharmaceutical families, the difference between small molecules and bio-pharmaceutical products, the regulatory requirements for biosimilars and the fact about biosimilars and biologic / bio pharmaceuticals the competent authorities and the key component of successful pharmacovigilane programs
Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, prepared useful Practice Aids pertaining to biosimilars for this CME/MOC/CNE/CPE activity titled "Biosimilars as Partners in Oncology: Expert Guidance on Understanding and Incorporating Biosimilar Agents in Real-World Care." For the full presentation, monograph, complete CME/MOC/CNE/CPE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at http://bit.ly/38DBgFb. CME/MOC/CNE/CPE credit will be available until April 27, 2021.
Bio similar and innovators - the battle of the two is a long story . In this presentation am trying to explain the merits nd demerits of each with available evidence
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Anti ulcer drugs and their Advance pharmacology ||
Anti-ulcer drugs are medications used to prevent and treat ulcers in the stomach and upper part of the small intestine (duodenal ulcers). These ulcers are often caused by an imbalance between stomach acid and the mucosal lining, which protects the stomach lining.
||Scope: Overview of various classes of anti-ulcer drugs, their mechanisms of action, indications, side effects, and clinical considerations.
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdfJim Jacob Roy
Cardiac conduction defects can occur due to various causes.
Atrioventricular conduction blocks ( AV blocks ) are classified into 3 types.
This document describes the acute management of AV block.
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stockrebeccabio
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
Telegram: bmksupplier
signal: +85264872720
threema: TUD4A6YC
You can contact me on Telegram or Threema
Communicate promptly and reply
Free of customs clearance, Double Clearance 100% pass delivery to USA, Canada, Spain, Germany, Netherland, Poland, Italy, Sweden, UK, Czech Republic, Australia, Mexico, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan.Door to door service
Hot Selling Organic intermediates
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar leads (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
2. Flow of thoughts for the day
Generics & Biosimilars
Generic Act
Generics
Biologics R&D
Need for biosimilars
Affordability Act
Goal post
Interchangeability
2
10. • 1984 Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act
(Hatch‐Waxman Act)
• Hatch‐Waxman balanced the originator‐molecule
manufacturers meaningful period of patent protection to
recover development costs with public expectation of less
expensive alternatives
10
11. Abbreviated New Drug Application
• section 505(j) FDCA
• established through the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Amendments
• generic drug program for “small molecule” drugs
• active ingredient is small in size and chemical origin
11
12. Small molecule generics
‐ identical copies made
‐ approximately 50 simple tests to demonstrate identity,
strength, quality, potency, purity
‐ fully characterized
‐ stable
12
13. - scientifically demonstrate that generic product is
bioequivalent
- in healthy volunteers measure bioavailability of generic
drug comparative to the innovator drug
- deliver same amount of active ingredients into human
bloodstream in same amount of time using the same route of
administration as innovator drug
13
18. 01 Modifying the selected cell
• Biologic medicines are made in living organisms by
genetically engineering DNA.
DNA is inserted into living cells, such as bacteria, yeast or
cultured animal cells, to code for the production of a
particular protein.
18
19. 02 Growing a cell line from
modified cell
• The most effective cell line is selected for expansion.
During selection, the cells that can produce the biologic most
effectively are identified.
This cell line is unique to each manufacturer and is the source
of all future products.
19
20. 03
Growing a large number of
cells from the cell line to produce
the desired protein
• The unique cell line is grown in bioreactors and carefully
monitored.
20
21. 04
• Separating the protein from the cells through filtration or
centrifugation
• Purifying the collected protein through chromatography
• Purified bulk drug characterisation and stability
21
22. Manufacturing process
Modify host cells
(bacteria,
mammalian ) to
produce
recombinant
proteins
Extract, refold,
purify
to generate drug
substance
Formulate to
stable finished
drug product
(vial, syringe,
cartridge)
Grow cells
under controlled
conditions in
bioreactor
.
22
23. • Biological ‐ manufacturer must ensure product consistency,
quality, and purity by ensuring that the manufacturing process
remains substantially the same over time.
23
24. • Manufacturing and quality control issues can impact patient
safety and result in a loss of confidence in the quality of
biologics.
• They can also cause product recalls and drug shortages, which
can have profound effects on patients, treatment practices
and overall confidence in biologics.
24
25. • A biologic medicine typically has around 250 in-process tests
during manufacturing, compared with around 50 tests for a
small molecule, to demonstrate safety and equivalent efficacy
and to ensure safe, reliable production of therapies for
patients.
25
26. • With expanding demand for good-quality biologics comes
challenge of bearing with healthcare expenditure.
• Regulated introduction of generic biologics into market can
increase access to much needed biologic medicines and
reduce costs.
26
28. Exclusivity
• application for follow-on biologic may not be submitted until
4 years after the date of first licensure of the reference
product.
• application for follow-on biologic may not be approved until
12 years after the date of first licensure of reference
product.
28
34. Rules of the New Game
• Public Health Service Act (PHS Act)
• Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCI Act)
• an abbreviated licensure pathway section 351(k)
• Affordable Care Act, signed into law by President Obama on
March 23, 2010
34
35. “ Twin pyramids ”
Purification process
development
Bioprocess development
Recombinant cell line development
Drug product
development
PK/PD
Preclinical
Biological
characterization
Physicochemical
characterization
Clinical
Process
development
Analytics
Confirmation
of
biosimilarity
35
37. Originator manufacturing process changes are the basis for
biosimilarity goal posts.
Reference product
2005 process
Reference product
2010 process
Biosimilar
37
40. Made in India Insulin
• Bowing to the stringent criteria required by the EU,
India-based Marvel Life Sciences officially notified the
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)
of EMA in December 2007, that it would withdraw its
applications for marketing authorisations for their
biosimilar human insulins, as they were unable to meet the
standards for comparability set by the CHMP.
40
41. • This ‘Marvel insulin episode’ is critical from an Indian
perspective as ‘alternative’ biological insulin continue to flood
the Indian market, despite the fact that in the EU has not yet
approved a biosimilar insulin.
• ‘Similar biologics guidelines’ 15 September 2012
41
43. Non-clinical data
Should include pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and comparative repeat-dose;
toxicity studies in a relevant species
Quality
All aspects of quality and heterogeneity should be assessed including
head-to-head comparisons with the reference product
Reference product
The reference product should be authorized in the country or another country with good regulations
43
44. Pharmacovigilance and risk management
A pharmacovigilance plan is required when an application is submitted
Clinical studies
Required to demonstrate similar safety and efficacy. Immunogenicity should
always be investigated in humans before authorization
Non-clinical data
44
45. ADR
• Incidence of pure red cell aplasia following a minor change in
the packaging process of epoetin alfa (erythropoietin, EPO)
made the world sit up and look at biopharmaceutical products
with more caution.
• It also prompted drug regulatory authorities to establish strict
guidelines for evaluating biopharmaceuticals and biosimilar
products.
45
46. Naming, tracking and tracing medicines
• Currently, the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) for a
new biosimilar may be the same as that of the original
biologic medicine.
• In such a case, with INN (without a distinguishable name),
when prescribing a biologic medicine, the treating physician
may not know precisely which medicine a pharmacist gave
the patient.
46
47. Interchangeability
• An application for interchangeability can be concurrent or
subsequent to the application for a biosimilar product under
351(k) of the BPCIA.
FDA criteria
• The biologic product should be biosimilar to the reference
biologic product
• It can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the
reference product in any given patient.
47
48. • For a biological product that is administered more than once
to an individual, the risk in terms of safety or diminished
efficacy of alternating or switching between use of the
biological product and the reference product should not be
greater than the risk of using the reference product without
such alternation or switch.
48