The document discusses ongoing copyright reform efforts in Europe. It provides background on the European Commission's goal of establishing a Digital Single Market and their recent proposal on copyright reform. It then examines some of the key issues around copyright exceptions for education and text/data mining. For education reform, it outlines what the Commission has proposed versus what educators argue is actually needed. For text/data mining, it evaluates the Commission's proposed exception as having some benefits but also limitations. The overall document analyzes ongoing copyright debates and positions from different stakeholders in Europe.
School of rocking copyright 2017 in Lisbon centrumcyfrowe
The document discusses copyright reform in the European Union, outlining the current problems with copyright law, the proposals from the European Commission, and recommendations from education advocates. It analyzes proposals around exceptions for education and text and data mining, as well as a new neighboring right for publishers. Overall, it argues the Commission's proposals do not go far enough to modernize copyright for uses like education across the EU.
In this lecture we cover supranational culture, its antecedents and consequences for international business. We discuss how supranational institutions, MNEs, language, migration etc. change national culture and lead to cultural convergence.
Copyright for educators_09v4-presentationRenee Setser
The Forney ISD does not discriminate and ensures equal access to programs and activities. Copyright law protects particular expressions of ideas and facts, not the ideas themselves. Fair use allows use of copyrighted works for purposes like teaching under certain guidelines regarding factors such as the portion used and the work's nature. Teachers should follow multimedia guidelines and district policy on video usage to ensure legal use of copyrighted materials.
140417 creative commons - esa presentationccAustralia
The document discusses open educational resources (OER) and Creative Commons licensing. It notes that current copyright schemes for schools are expensive and restrictive. OER aim to make resources freely available to use, modify, and share. Most OER use Creative Commons licenses which allow creators to select how their work can be used. The document provides examples of attributing and modifying works with CC licenses and gives suggestions for how to find OER through sites like OER Commons, YouTube, Wikimedia Commons and more.
This document discusses copyright and fair use. It explains that copyright protects original creative works and outlines penalties for copying or distributing those works without permission. Fair use allows for limited use of copyrighted works under certain circumstances, such as for educational purposes. The four factors that determine fair use are the purpose of the use, the nature of the work, the amount used, and the effect on the work's potential market. Examples are provided of general public use, fair use, and illegal use of copyrighted materials. Viewers are directed to additional resources for more information on copyright and fair use guidelines.
Learn how copyright supports the rights of both owners and users and strengthen your understanding of how the doctrine of fair use applies to the practice of teaching and learning with digital media, technology, mass media and popular culture.
Presentation given at the 2017 Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA) conference in New Orleans. Panelists included Jay Fialkov, Deputy General Counsel at WGBH Educational Foundation, Hope O'Keeffe, Senior Associate General Counsel at the Library of Congress, and Casey Davis Kaufman, Associate Director at WGBH Media Library and Archives and Project Manager at the American Archive of Public Broadcasting
School of rocking copyright 2017 in Lisbon centrumcyfrowe
The document discusses copyright reform in the European Union, outlining the current problems with copyright law, the proposals from the European Commission, and recommendations from education advocates. It analyzes proposals around exceptions for education and text and data mining, as well as a new neighboring right for publishers. Overall, it argues the Commission's proposals do not go far enough to modernize copyright for uses like education across the EU.
In this lecture we cover supranational culture, its antecedents and consequences for international business. We discuss how supranational institutions, MNEs, language, migration etc. change national culture and lead to cultural convergence.
Copyright for educators_09v4-presentationRenee Setser
The Forney ISD does not discriminate and ensures equal access to programs and activities. Copyright law protects particular expressions of ideas and facts, not the ideas themselves. Fair use allows use of copyrighted works for purposes like teaching under certain guidelines regarding factors such as the portion used and the work's nature. Teachers should follow multimedia guidelines and district policy on video usage to ensure legal use of copyrighted materials.
140417 creative commons - esa presentationccAustralia
The document discusses open educational resources (OER) and Creative Commons licensing. It notes that current copyright schemes for schools are expensive and restrictive. OER aim to make resources freely available to use, modify, and share. Most OER use Creative Commons licenses which allow creators to select how their work can be used. The document provides examples of attributing and modifying works with CC licenses and gives suggestions for how to find OER through sites like OER Commons, YouTube, Wikimedia Commons and more.
This document discusses copyright and fair use. It explains that copyright protects original creative works and outlines penalties for copying or distributing those works without permission. Fair use allows for limited use of copyrighted works under certain circumstances, such as for educational purposes. The four factors that determine fair use are the purpose of the use, the nature of the work, the amount used, and the effect on the work's potential market. Examples are provided of general public use, fair use, and illegal use of copyrighted materials. Viewers are directed to additional resources for more information on copyright and fair use guidelines.
Learn how copyright supports the rights of both owners and users and strengthen your understanding of how the doctrine of fair use applies to the practice of teaching and learning with digital media, technology, mass media and popular culture.
Presentation given at the 2017 Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA) conference in New Orleans. Panelists included Jay Fialkov, Deputy General Counsel at WGBH Educational Foundation, Hope O'Keeffe, Senior Associate General Counsel at the Library of Congress, and Casey Davis Kaufman, Associate Director at WGBH Media Library and Archives and Project Manager at the American Archive of Public Broadcasting
"Let’s tackle it together: recent changes in copyright and intellectual prope...TDBaldwin
The document summarizes recent changes to UK copyright law and what they mean for academic libraries. Key changes include reforms to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, the introduction of Extended Collective Licensing, and extensions to copyright terms. For higher education, the changes enable greater use of works for teaching, research, and library services. Academic libraries need to work with rights holders and other groups to understand and respond to ongoing legal reforms. Staying up to date on copyright issues requires following various organizations and resources.
A research-friendly copyright environment in the digital age: a European pers...Jean-François Dechamp
A 30-minute presentation that builds the case for a copyright exception for scientific research in the European legislation, in order to allow data analytics (Text and Data Mining / TDM)
This document discusses plans to develop a "Big Open Legal Data" (BOLD) vision and platform by 2020. It would build on existing EU legal data systems like EUR-Lex and involve launching an EU legal social network and open access legal journal hub. The document outlines presentations given at the LAPSI2 conference, including discussing past efforts to increase free access to law, developing large online legal datasets, and case studies examining barriers to open access in the EU, Netherlands, UK and Austria. It argues the EU legal system is uniquely multilingual and its law has influenced national legislation, serving as an example for free access.
The importance of content-mining in the EC policy on open accessJean-François Dechamp
The document summarizes the European Commission's policy on open access and text and data mining (TDM). It discusses two Commissioner's support for open access to boost innovation. The Commission aims to optimize the impact of publicly funded research by making it openly accessible. It developed a strategy including open access mandates in FP7 and Horizon 2020. The Commission sees efficient TDM as a way to maximize research impact, and that existing legal and technical barriers to TDM must be removed so that publicly funded content can be mined. The Commission understands stakeholders' concerns and wants to ensure any TDM policy solutions are coherent with its broader open access and open science policies.
Quant - Interchain Development And Cross-Chain Protocols. BlockchainLive 2018Gilbert Verdian
The Internet of Trust: Network of inter-connected blockchain networks to transact Value.
I covered the history of the Internet, the mistakes we made with OSI and why we’re making the same mistakes again on blockchain.
The problem with Blockchain today is lack of Openness, Adoption and Proprietary Technology
#Overledger solves this.
Developing a research Library position statement on Text and Data Mining in t...Danny Kingsley
These are slides from a workshop held during the RLUK2017 Conference http://rlukconference.com/ presented by Dr Danny Kingsley, Dr Deborah Hansen and Anna Vernon.
The Abstract:
"The library community has been almost silent on the issue of text and data mining (T&DM) partly due to concerns about the risk of having institutions ‘cut off’ from subscriptions due to large downloads of research articles for the purpose of mining. This workshop is an intention to identify where the information rests about T&DM - including looking at the details as they appear in Jisc negotiated licenses - consider some case studies and develop together a set of principles that identify the position of research libraries in the on the issue of T&DM. "
Text and data mining in UK and France (ADBU - 13 Dec 16)Rob Johnson
Slides from my presentation in Paris on 13 Dec 2016, summarising the findings of our study on text and data mining in public research for the ADBU. Full report available at http://adbu.fr/etude-tdm/.
This document discusses the Openlaws project, which was co-funded by the European Union to study legal publishing systems and developments toward open access to law across Europe. It summarizes the project partners and methodology, which included producing case studies of the EU, UK, Netherlands, and Austria examining how each country provides free access to cases, legislation, and other legal information. It also analyzes requirements for stakeholders, identifies challenges around legal publishing, court systems, copyright, government data, human rights, and austerity economics, and concludes that solutions must address these six challenges with an interdisciplinary and international approach.
Courts around the world are creating Internet law right now--a process that is both exciting and frightening to watch. Unlike other areas of commerce that can turn to historical traditions to help settle disputes and guide the development of the law, the law of the Internet has no history to fall back on. "Cyber law" is instead being developed by judges who must do their best to fit legal disputes on the Internet into preexisting legal frameworks. As a result, the legal principles governing conduct and commerce in cyberspace are still in a state of flux.
The document summarizes the European Commission's policy on open access to publications and research data resulting from publicly funded research. It outlines the Commission's role in setting open access mandates for EU-funded projects and proposing legislation. It also discusses next steps, including expanding open access requirements in Horizon 2020 and adopting recommendations to member states on access and data management policies.
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015Greg Sterling
This document discusses the need to modernize EU copyright rules to adapt to the digital environment. It notes that while the internet has increased access to creative content, EU copyright laws have not kept pace and fragmentation remains. The document proposes actions to ensure wider access to content across EU borders by addressing issues like "portability" and territorial licensing that currently limit the cross-border availability of online content within the EU single market. The overall goal is to develop a more unified European copyright framework that benefits both content creators and consumers.
Openlaws.eu is funded by JUST/2013/ACTION GRANTS Grant Agreement Number 4562, led by the University of Amsterdam during the period March 2014-2016. The case study is of the European institutions' provision of free access to European Union law, in terms of cases, legislation, regulatory instruments and academic-expert analysis. The analysis explains how and whether the environment (institutions, policies and the legal community) is finally developing in which open access models such as openlaws.eu can take root and flourish. The key functionalities of the existing legal publishing system are summarized and described. This activity involves a review of the existing information systems and legal databases already in use and will produce a specification of the requirements of the system on the basis of the analysis of social, legal and market requirements. The case studies represent the key socio-economic and legal aspects of the services and illustrate the main functionalities, structure and operation of the proposed services. The findings are informed by key informant interviews and form a working assumption. The interviews are supported by the literature review, and the insights of workshops (including the LASPSI workshop on 3 September 2014).
The breadth of stakeholders interviewed is broad and includes experts from: academia, Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPB), trading funds, private entrepreneurs, corporations, standards bodies, non-governmental organizations and government policy officials with both domestic and international responsibilities. Note that the case studies rely on a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) framework in order to identify the key components of the problem and provide the key specifications for the system that is to be built, while the third activity will rely on a combination of desk research, in-depth interviews, and focus groups.
Argument (598 words):
We argue that the European legal informatics space is unique in seven respects compared to national case studies.
1. The decision to make access to documentation freely available at production and then no charge was made in the context of no developed market actors to challenge the decision to ‘super-nationalise’ the state provision of legal information and case law reportage. There was no precedent for a multilingual economic and political area such as this, with four original languages and a precedent setting ‘Supreme Court’.
2. The essential role of European law in creating the ‘acquis communitaire’ led to a political decision to make law as widely available as possible. The benefits in creating an essential knowledge of European law amongst a critical mass of advocates at national levels was considered so important from the 1950s onwards that there was no serious resistance beyond basic budgetary questions.
As a result, it may be argued that European legal data is so open to reuse and access that it is the ‘exception that proves the rule’.
Libraries at the centre of the debate on copyright and text and data mining: ...LIBER Europe
This document discusses text and data mining (TDM) and the debate around copyright. It makes three key points:
1) TDM has the potential to save lives by discovering new medical treatments, but copyright law is unclear if TDM infringes on copyright by copying content. Licensing models are not scalable solutions.
2) A workshop with stakeholders found that copyright reform is needed, including a specific exception in EU law for TDM and addressing legal uncertainty. Harmonization of copyright law across borders is also important.
3) Going forward, LIBER will advocate for copyright reform, support international harmonization efforts, engage stakeholders, and promote open access and interoperable licensing to help TDM grow in Europe
The document outlines a schedule and process for developing a Bill of Rights for social network users through an open online constitutional convention. It includes panels on existing bills of rights, an initial draft being posted for online discussion, revising the draft based on those discussions, and then a final debate and voting process to take place online and in a webcast. The goals are to get a wide range of input to help set expectations for social networks around key user rights and potentially inform future legislation and regulation.
Our FutureTDM workshop at the European Parliament focus at the development of TDM policy. With EU copyright reform now in progress, we bring together policy makers and stakeholder groups so that we can share FutureTDM’s findings and our first expert driven policy recommendations that can help increase EU TDM.
This document discusses copyright and creative commons licensing. It begins with questions about what copyright is and isn't, then provides information on what types of work copyright covers and the meaning of public domain. The rest of the document discusses the purpose of copyright in encouraging creativity, how long copyright lasts, exceptions and limitations to copyright like fair use and fair dealing, and alternatives to traditional copyright like creative commons licensing. Creative commons licenses are explained, including the six types of CC licenses available in Scotland. The document provides guidance on assessing copyright risk and examples of analyzing copyright issues.
Prezentacja raportu "Ustawa o ponownym wykorzystywaniu Informacji Sektora Publicznego" przygotowanego przez Fundację ePaństwo i Centrum Cyfrowe. Licencja: CC BY 4.0.
"Let’s tackle it together: recent changes in copyright and intellectual prope...TDBaldwin
The document summarizes recent changes to UK copyright law and what they mean for academic libraries. Key changes include reforms to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, the introduction of Extended Collective Licensing, and extensions to copyright terms. For higher education, the changes enable greater use of works for teaching, research, and library services. Academic libraries need to work with rights holders and other groups to understand and respond to ongoing legal reforms. Staying up to date on copyright issues requires following various organizations and resources.
A research-friendly copyright environment in the digital age: a European pers...Jean-François Dechamp
A 30-minute presentation that builds the case for a copyright exception for scientific research in the European legislation, in order to allow data analytics (Text and Data Mining / TDM)
This document discusses plans to develop a "Big Open Legal Data" (BOLD) vision and platform by 2020. It would build on existing EU legal data systems like EUR-Lex and involve launching an EU legal social network and open access legal journal hub. The document outlines presentations given at the LAPSI2 conference, including discussing past efforts to increase free access to law, developing large online legal datasets, and case studies examining barriers to open access in the EU, Netherlands, UK and Austria. It argues the EU legal system is uniquely multilingual and its law has influenced national legislation, serving as an example for free access.
The importance of content-mining in the EC policy on open accessJean-François Dechamp
The document summarizes the European Commission's policy on open access and text and data mining (TDM). It discusses two Commissioner's support for open access to boost innovation. The Commission aims to optimize the impact of publicly funded research by making it openly accessible. It developed a strategy including open access mandates in FP7 and Horizon 2020. The Commission sees efficient TDM as a way to maximize research impact, and that existing legal and technical barriers to TDM must be removed so that publicly funded content can be mined. The Commission understands stakeholders' concerns and wants to ensure any TDM policy solutions are coherent with its broader open access and open science policies.
Quant - Interchain Development And Cross-Chain Protocols. BlockchainLive 2018Gilbert Verdian
The Internet of Trust: Network of inter-connected blockchain networks to transact Value.
I covered the history of the Internet, the mistakes we made with OSI and why we’re making the same mistakes again on blockchain.
The problem with Blockchain today is lack of Openness, Adoption and Proprietary Technology
#Overledger solves this.
Developing a research Library position statement on Text and Data Mining in t...Danny Kingsley
These are slides from a workshop held during the RLUK2017 Conference http://rlukconference.com/ presented by Dr Danny Kingsley, Dr Deborah Hansen and Anna Vernon.
The Abstract:
"The library community has been almost silent on the issue of text and data mining (T&DM) partly due to concerns about the risk of having institutions ‘cut off’ from subscriptions due to large downloads of research articles for the purpose of mining. This workshop is an intention to identify where the information rests about T&DM - including looking at the details as they appear in Jisc negotiated licenses - consider some case studies and develop together a set of principles that identify the position of research libraries in the on the issue of T&DM. "
Text and data mining in UK and France (ADBU - 13 Dec 16)Rob Johnson
Slides from my presentation in Paris on 13 Dec 2016, summarising the findings of our study on text and data mining in public research for the ADBU. Full report available at http://adbu.fr/etude-tdm/.
This document discusses the Openlaws project, which was co-funded by the European Union to study legal publishing systems and developments toward open access to law across Europe. It summarizes the project partners and methodology, which included producing case studies of the EU, UK, Netherlands, and Austria examining how each country provides free access to cases, legislation, and other legal information. It also analyzes requirements for stakeholders, identifies challenges around legal publishing, court systems, copyright, government data, human rights, and austerity economics, and concludes that solutions must address these six challenges with an interdisciplinary and international approach.
Courts around the world are creating Internet law right now--a process that is both exciting and frightening to watch. Unlike other areas of commerce that can turn to historical traditions to help settle disputes and guide the development of the law, the law of the Internet has no history to fall back on. "Cyber law" is instead being developed by judges who must do their best to fit legal disputes on the Internet into preexisting legal frameworks. As a result, the legal principles governing conduct and commerce in cyberspace are still in a state of flux.
The document summarizes the European Commission's policy on open access to publications and research data resulting from publicly funded research. It outlines the Commission's role in setting open access mandates for EU-funded projects and proposing legislation. It also discusses next steps, including expanding open access requirements in Horizon 2020 and adopting recommendations to member states on access and data management policies.
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015Greg Sterling
This document discusses the need to modernize EU copyright rules to adapt to the digital environment. It notes that while the internet has increased access to creative content, EU copyright laws have not kept pace and fragmentation remains. The document proposes actions to ensure wider access to content across EU borders by addressing issues like "portability" and territorial licensing that currently limit the cross-border availability of online content within the EU single market. The overall goal is to develop a more unified European copyright framework that benefits both content creators and consumers.
Openlaws.eu is funded by JUST/2013/ACTION GRANTS Grant Agreement Number 4562, led by the University of Amsterdam during the period March 2014-2016. The case study is of the European institutions' provision of free access to European Union law, in terms of cases, legislation, regulatory instruments and academic-expert analysis. The analysis explains how and whether the environment (institutions, policies and the legal community) is finally developing in which open access models such as openlaws.eu can take root and flourish. The key functionalities of the existing legal publishing system are summarized and described. This activity involves a review of the existing information systems and legal databases already in use and will produce a specification of the requirements of the system on the basis of the analysis of social, legal and market requirements. The case studies represent the key socio-economic and legal aspects of the services and illustrate the main functionalities, structure and operation of the proposed services. The findings are informed by key informant interviews and form a working assumption. The interviews are supported by the literature review, and the insights of workshops (including the LASPSI workshop on 3 September 2014).
The breadth of stakeholders interviewed is broad and includes experts from: academia, Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPB), trading funds, private entrepreneurs, corporations, standards bodies, non-governmental organizations and government policy officials with both domestic and international responsibilities. Note that the case studies rely on a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) framework in order to identify the key components of the problem and provide the key specifications for the system that is to be built, while the third activity will rely on a combination of desk research, in-depth interviews, and focus groups.
Argument (598 words):
We argue that the European legal informatics space is unique in seven respects compared to national case studies.
1. The decision to make access to documentation freely available at production and then no charge was made in the context of no developed market actors to challenge the decision to ‘super-nationalise’ the state provision of legal information and case law reportage. There was no precedent for a multilingual economic and political area such as this, with four original languages and a precedent setting ‘Supreme Court’.
2. The essential role of European law in creating the ‘acquis communitaire’ led to a political decision to make law as widely available as possible. The benefits in creating an essential knowledge of European law amongst a critical mass of advocates at national levels was considered so important from the 1950s onwards that there was no serious resistance beyond basic budgetary questions.
As a result, it may be argued that European legal data is so open to reuse and access that it is the ‘exception that proves the rule’.
Libraries at the centre of the debate on copyright and text and data mining: ...LIBER Europe
This document discusses text and data mining (TDM) and the debate around copyright. It makes three key points:
1) TDM has the potential to save lives by discovering new medical treatments, but copyright law is unclear if TDM infringes on copyright by copying content. Licensing models are not scalable solutions.
2) A workshop with stakeholders found that copyright reform is needed, including a specific exception in EU law for TDM and addressing legal uncertainty. Harmonization of copyright law across borders is also important.
3) Going forward, LIBER will advocate for copyright reform, support international harmonization efforts, engage stakeholders, and promote open access and interoperable licensing to help TDM grow in Europe
The document outlines a schedule and process for developing a Bill of Rights for social network users through an open online constitutional convention. It includes panels on existing bills of rights, an initial draft being posted for online discussion, revising the draft based on those discussions, and then a final debate and voting process to take place online and in a webcast. The goals are to get a wide range of input to help set expectations for social networks around key user rights and potentially inform future legislation and regulation.
Our FutureTDM workshop at the European Parliament focus at the development of TDM policy. With EU copyright reform now in progress, we bring together policy makers and stakeholder groups so that we can share FutureTDM’s findings and our first expert driven policy recommendations that can help increase EU TDM.
This document discusses copyright and creative commons licensing. It begins with questions about what copyright is and isn't, then provides information on what types of work copyright covers and the meaning of public domain. The rest of the document discusses the purpose of copyright in encouraging creativity, how long copyright lasts, exceptions and limitations to copyright like fair use and fair dealing, and alternatives to traditional copyright like creative commons licensing. Creative commons licenses are explained, including the six types of CC licenses available in Scotland. The document provides guidance on assessing copyright risk and examples of analyzing copyright issues.
Similar to School of rock(ing) UE copyright - 2017 Ljubljana (20)
Prezentacja raportu "Ustawa o ponownym wykorzystywaniu Informacji Sektora Publicznego" przygotowanego przez Fundację ePaństwo i Centrum Cyfrowe. Licencja: CC BY 4.0.
Creative Commons - everything you want to know:) centrumcyfrowe
This document discusses issues with traditional copyright and how Creative Commons (CC) provides solutions through standardized copyright licenses. CC licenses allow creators to grant permissions for others to use and share their work while still retaining copyright. The licenses provide options like allowing adaptations (SA) or prohibiting commercial use (NC). CC also provides tools to dedicate works to the public domain and identify works already in it.
Prezentacja Natalii Mileszyk (Centrum Cyfrowe) przygotowana na potrzeby wykładu podczas szkolenia "Długie życie fotografii", organizowanego przez Fundację Archeologia Fotografii w dniach 26-27 kwietnia 2016.
Prezentacja Natalii Mileszyk (Centrum Cyfrowe) na temat licencji Creative Commons przygotowana na potrzeby wykładu podczas szkolenia "Długie życie fotografii", organizowanego przez Fundację Archeologia Fotografii w dniach 26-27 kwietnia 2016.
Prezentacja Natalii Mileszyk (Centrum Cyfrowe) przygotowana na potrzeby wykładu podczas szkolenia "Długie życie fotografii", organizowanego przez Fundację Archeologia Fotografii w dniach 26-27 kwietnia 2016.
TDM: Eksploracja tekstu i danych w instytucjach kulturycentrumcyfrowe
Prezentacja Katarzyny Werner-Mozolewskiej wygłoszona podczas wydarzenia "SWOBODA UŻYCIA. Domena publiczna w instytucjach kultury", które odbyło się w Zachęcie (26.11.2015).
Prezentacja wyników badań przeprowadzonych w ramach projektu "Kompetencje instytucji kultury a praktyczny wymiar wdrażania otwartości", podsumowanych w raporcie "Otwartość w instytucjach kultury", dostępnym: http://bit.ly/1Kmchm9
Anna Stokowska: podsumowanie cyklu webinarów o Otwartych Zasobach Edukacyjnyc...centrumcyfrowe
Podczas ostatniego webinarium Anna Stokowska omówi razem z uczestnikami realizowane przez nich pomiędzy kolejnymi webinariami zadania. Będzie to także czas na dyskusję na temat tego, jak nauczyciele akademiccy mogą konkretnie wykorzystywać otwarte zasoby i czy widzą w nich rozwiązanie dla swoich dydaktycznych wyzwań.
Karolina Grodecka: Adaptowanie i publikowanie Otwartych Zasobów Edukacyjnych....centrumcyfrowe
W zależności od licencji wybranej dla OZE przez autora każdy może używać, kopiować, zmieniać i dystrybuować te zasoby. Pozwala to nauczycielom, autorom kursów i zajęć uniknąć trudnego i czasochłonnego przygotowywania zasobów. Celem webinaru jest zdobycie umiejętności dostosowywania otwartych zasobów edukacyjnych do własnego kontekstu i potrzeb wynikających ze specyfiki nauczanego przedmiotu.
W rezultacie webinaru uczestnicy będą:
-rozumieli różnicę między wykorzystaniem OZE i zasobów objętych tradycyjnym prawem autorskim,
-potrafili korzystywać z OZE zgodnie z warunkami licencji,
-znali sposoby efektywnej lokalizacji otwartych treści,
-znali serwisy do publikacji własnych materiałów w sieci w otwarty sposób.
Jak uatrakcyjnić wykład, prezentując ciekawy film bez konieczności jego samodzielnego nakręcenia? Otwarte Zasoby Edukacyjne są rozwiązaniem. Celem trzeciego webinarium jest zdobycie umiejętności wyszukiwania oraz selekcji otwartych zasobów online przydatnych dla nauczanego przedmiotu.
W rezultacie szkolenia uczestnicy będą:
-znali najpopularniejsze wyszukiwarki OZE,
-znali serwisy i repozytoria OZE na poziomie akadmickim,
-potrafili efektywnie wyszukiwać różne rodzaje OZE (grafika, wideo, audio, podręczniki, animacje, etc.) za pomocą narzędzia online,
-potrafili wyszukiwać OZE na potrzeby prowadzenia zajęć i innych działań akademickich.
Kamil Śliwowski: Prawo autorskie a dzielenie się materiałami edukacyjnymi w s...centrumcyfrowe
Czym są licencje CC i jakie mają zastosowanie? Kamil Śliwowski bezboleśnie przeprowadzi uczestników drugiego webinarium przez podstawy prawa autorskiego oraz praktyczne aspekty używania licencji Creative Commons.
dr Alek Tarkowski: Czy otwartość się opłaca?centrumcyfrowe
Czym jest otwartość? Jakie korzyści wiążą się z wyborem modelu otwartościowego w nauczaniu, a co nadal pozostaje wyzwaniem? W otwierającym webinarium naszego cyklu Alek Tarkowski przedstawi możliwe scenariusze korzystania z otwartości w edukacji i nauce.
Melissa Hagemann - "State of OER. Brazil and South Africa"centrumcyfrowe
"State of OER. Brazil and South Africa". Slides by Melissa Hagemann, presented at the "OER Policy Works!" workshop at Centrum Cyfrowe, on 18th of March 2014 in Warsaw, Poland.
"OER: Overview & History". Slides by Melissa Hagemann, presented at the "OER Policy Works!" workshop at Centrum Cyfrowe, on 18th of March 2014 in Warsaw, Poland
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
3. Where are we now?
Public debate → Policy debates → Commission →Council / Parliament→
Member States
Regions
Policy
Options
Proposal Decision Implementation
● The European Commission wants a Digital
Single Market for Europe, and copyright is a
top priority for them.
● After consultations, policy debates and lots
of lobby meetings they have come up with a
proposal in mid September 2016. .
4. Copyright in Europe
● Copyright law in Europe aims to balance the interest of creators
(exclusive rights) and the interest of society at large (exceptions and
limitations to exclusive rights.
● The balance is off. Exclusive rights have been harmonised and are
increasing, while exceptions and limitations are fragmented and
unharmonised in Europe.
5.
6. Copyright Reform for Education
The current problems:
1. Fairly opened and flexible exception in the InfoSoc, but not mandatory
2. Narrow implementations in the MS, leading to cross-border problems
3. National laws use unclear language, leading to legal uncertainty
4. Certain acts are allowed in face-to-face teaching but not online
5. Patchwork of solutions: only 16 MS allow quotes of full-sized images;
teaching compilations are not permitted in 4 countries; only 12 MS allow a
teacher to make a non-commercial compilation without payment; 10 MS
do not permit translations for educational purposes (beyond quotations
7. Copyright Reform for Education
What the Commission proposes:
1.Context: mandatory exception that covers only digital uses that take
place on the premises or through a secure electronic network
2.Rights: applicable only to reproduction, communication to the public,
making available to the public
3.Works: material protected by copyright or neighbouring rights, databases
and computer programs. MS can exclude materials subject to licenses.
4.Beneficiaries: educational establishment (not defined in the Directive)
and its pupils, students and teaching staff
8. Copyright Reform for Education
What education needs:
1.Context: mandatory exception that is technologically neutral
2.Rights: applicable to all harmonized rights, ie reproduction,
communication to the public, making available to the public and
distribution right
3.Works: copyrighted works, material protected by neighbouring rights,
databases and computer programs. Licenses should not take precedence.
4.Beneficiaries: opened-network of users
5.Fair Use Limitation (worst-case scenario: NC limitation)
9. Copyright Reform for Education
What education needs:
A single “open-ended” mandatory exception covering all acts of use by
an open-ended network of users, to ensure harmonization and EU-wide
educational uses of all protected materials: InfoSoc exception
What education does not need:
An exception that divides online/offline, digital/analogue,
formal/informal education, and that adds legal complexity (overlaps
with existing InfoSoc exception): DSM exception
10. Copyright Reform for Text and Data Mining
First, what the hell is text and data mining?
● “Any automated analytical technique aiming to analyse text and data in
digital form in order to generate information such as patterns, trends and
correlations”
● Huge untapped potential for scientific investigation, novel discoveries
● Legal complexity: Facts not copyrightable, some data could be, sui generis
database rights
● Publishers want to leverage TDM as another revenue source
11. Copyright Reform for Text and Data Mining
What would have been an ideal situation:
An EU-wide exception that permits TDM of all lawfully-accessed
materials—by anyone—for any purpose.
12. Copyright Reform for Text and Data Mining
What was proposed by the Commission:
● Exception will apply to reproductions and extractions made by research
organisations in order to carry out text and data mining of works to which
they have lawful access for the purposes of scientific research.
● Contractual provisions contrary to the exception shall be unenforceable.
● Rightholders can apply necessary measures to ensure the security and
integrity of content databases.
● Rightsholders and research organizations will chat about best practices.
Maybe.
13. Copyright Reform for Text and Data Mining
The good:
● Mandatory, so will apply uniformly across all EU members states
● Rights granted under the exception cannot be contracted away by
publishing contracts or terms of service
The bad:
● Only applies to non-profit research organisations (meaning all other users
must get a license)
● Limited to scientific research (meaning all other uses must be licensed)
14. Casus - Reporting back
- Why was it worth to ask this question?
- What was challenging while working on answers?
- How can we use the info we’ve just prepared?
15. What is NOT in the proposal
● No right to remix, no fair
use or open norm
● No mention of the Public
Domain or aims to
strengthen it
● No mention of freedom of
panorama
CC BY 2.0: Alex E. Proimos
17. Brussels and the European Union
Brussels:
● European Commission
● Council of the European
Union
● European Council
● European Parliament
Luxembourg:
● Court of Justice of the
European Union
● Court of Auditors
Frankfurt:
● European Central Bank
18. Brussels and the European Union
Brussels hosts:
● European Commission
● Council of the European
Union
● European Council
● European Parliament
20. European Commission: Who are they?
Role: Represent general interest of the
EU as a whole
● 28 members of the Commission
● One member per member state
● President: Jean-Claude Juncker
21. European Commission: What do they do?
The European Commission (EC)
● Proposes legislation
● Implements decisions
● Upholds EU treaties
● Manages day-to-day business
● Is the executive body
22. European Commission: What do they do?
● Proposes legislation: EC can make formal proposals
for legislation
24. Council: Who are they?
Role: Represent the interests of the
national governments
● Representatives (national ministers)
of every member state
● Presidency rotation: Slovakia
Fair Use: the Council of the European Union
25. Council: What do they do?
● Legislative powers
● Budgetary powers
26. The European Parliament
CC0 Public Domain (by Garry Knight)
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
27. European Parliament: Who are they?
Role: represent European Citizens
● 751 parliamentarians (MEPs)
● 7 parliamentary groups
○ European People’s Party (EPP)
○ Socialists & Democrats (S&D)
28. European Parliament: What do they do?
● Legislative powers
● Budgetary powers
● EC is accountable to the Parliament
● Elects the president of the Commission
● Approves the appointment of the Commission as a
whole
30. Ordinary Legislative Procedure
- Main legislative procedure by which directives and
regulations are adopted
- Article 294 Treaty of the Functioning of the
European Union
More info:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/20150201PVL00004/Legislative-powers
31. #0 Before the Proposal
Research & Consultations
CC0 Public Domain (by holdentrils)
32. #1 Commission Proposal
European Commission submits
legislative proposal to the
European Parliament Commission Proposal
Commission initiative
Request EU institution
Request EU country
Citizens’ initiative
Proposal
33. #1b MS’ opinions
Member States have eights weeks to send their
reasoned opinions on compliance of draft
legislative texts with the subsidiarity principle
to the Council, the European Parliament and
the Commission.
34. #2 1st reading in the Parliament
President - European Parliament
Parliamentary committee
European Parliament
The European Parliament
examines the
Commission’s proposal
and may adopt or amend
it.
35. #3 1st reading in Council
The Council can adopt
or amend and return
the proposal to
Parliament.
Amend
Adopt
36. #4 2nd reading in Parliament
The parliament either approves
or rejects the Council’s position.
RejectApprove
Amend
37. #5 2nd reading in
Council
The Council approves or
convenes a Conciliation
Committee.
Adopt
47. Top ten advocacy tips
1. Be early
2. Be reliable
3. Be honest
4. Be understanding
5. Be nice
6. Be thorough
7. Be brief To get to know more check also:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
49. How to talk?
1. Never ask someone to go against their party line. Ask them to share your
concerns with their group.
2. 20 individual phone calls are usually more effective than aletter signed by
200.
3. Stats & Studies. More! More! More!
4. Don't ask for world peace!
51. What can you do (to help)?
1. Keep us and each other in the loop:
a. Share if things are happening on a national level.
2. Engage your local communities:
a. Inform your local friends on what’s at stake. Organise debate nights, share interesting
resources. Keep in mind to keep it (relatively) simple
3. Think about how you want to engage:
a. For the topics that you love, create a factsheet, organise a meeting, write happy or angry
tweets to Commissioners. Making your voice heard is fundamental, the way you do it is
52. What can you do (to help)?
4. Talk to your representatives:
● Your national government
● Your European Parliament Representatives
● People at big organisations with a voice
53. Most importantly
If you don’t speak up, nobody will hear you. Copyright
reform activists are in the minority, we need all men on
deck in these important times.
All contributions are welcome and needed.
54. Thank you!
Let’s #FixCopyright together
Unless otherwise noted, everything in this presentation is
released into the Public Domain using CC0.
Editor's Notes
Article 13 of the Treaty of European Union lists seven principal decision making bodies of the European Union: The European Parliament, the European Council, the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank and the Court of Auditors.
4 out of the seven institutions are based in Brussels making Brussels the unofficial capital of the European Union.
The European Commission: is the executive arm of the Union. It provides impetus and direction. The current President is Jean-Claude Juncker (EPP)
Council of the European Union: is a body holding legislative and some limited executive powers and is thus the main decision making body of the Union.
The European Council: is the group of head of state or government of the EU member states. It provides impetus and direction. The president is Donald Tusk.
The European Parliament: shares the legislative and budgetary autority of the Union with the Council of the European Union.
The European Commission, the Council of the EU and the European Parliament have legislative powers, since we are talking about how (copyright) law gets changed, these institutions are most important to us.
Picture by www.GlynLowe.com
The European Commission exists out of 28 persons. They are members of the Commission or simply ‘commissioners’. Every member state provides one commissioners. The commissioners have to represent the general interest of the EU as a whole. They are bound to act independently. They can be characterized as a ‘government’. One of the 28 commissioners is the president: Jean-Claude Juncker.
Picture By Factio popularis Europaea - http://www.flickr.com/photos/eppofficial/12995014393/, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=31525961
The European Commission (EC) is the executive body of the European Union. They operate as a ‘government’. It proposes legislations, implements decisions, upholds eu treaties and manages day-to-day business.
The European Commission is the only institution of the European Union that can make formal proposals for legislation. The Council and Parliament are able to request legislation. Often, the Commission initiates legislative proposals on the basis of these requests.
The Council represents the national interests of the member states. The Council consists out of representatives of the 28 member states. These representatives vary per topic. The presidency of the Council rotates every six months among the governments of the EU members states. At the moment Slovakia holds the presidency. The Foreign Affairs Council is chaired by the Union’s High Representative
The Council of the European Union, in short the Council, can be seen as one of the two chambers of the EU’s legislative branch (the other being the European Parliament). The Council also shares the budgetary power of the Union with the parliament.
The European Parliament (EP) is the directly elected parliamentary institution of the European Union. They represent the citizens. The EP is composed of 751 parliamentarians who are known as Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). The seats are distributed according to ‘degressive proportionaility’, meaning the larger the state, the more citizens are represented per MEP. There are 7 parliamentary groups. The biggest groups are the European People’s Party (EPP) and the Socialists & Democrats (S&D).
The Parliament shares their legislative powers and budgetary powers with the Council. The European Commission is accountable to the Parliament. The parliament elects the president of the Commission and approves the appointment of the Commission as a whole.
The main legislative procedure by which directives and regulations are adopted follow the procedure described in article 294 of the Functioning of the European Union. A "regulation" is a binding legislative act. It must be applied in its entirety across the EU. A "directive" is a legislative act that sets out a goal that all EU countries must achieve. However, it is up to the individual countries to devise their own laws on how to reach these goals. These are the most common.
Before proposing legislation the Commission takes stock of existing laws and conducts an impact assessment to evaluate the potential economic, social and environmental consequences of any new initiative. New situations and issues developing in Europe and possible implications for the new legislation are also taken into account.
The Commission must also consult interested parties and other institutions for their views and seek the opinions of national parliaments and governments.
The European Commission prepares legislative proposals on its own initiative or at the request of other EU institutions or countries, or following a citizens' initiative, often after public consultations. The final proposal is forwarded simultaneously to the European Parliament, Council and national parliaments and, in some cases, to the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee.
The President of the European Parliament refers the proposal to a parliamentary committee, which appoints a rapporteur who is responsible for drawing up a draft report containing amendments to the proposed text. The committee votes on this report and any amendments to it tabled by other members. The European Parliament then discusses and votes on the legislative proposal in plenary on the basis of the committee report and amendments. The result is the Parliament's position. Parliament can accept the proposal without any changes or make amendments. In rare cases the President can request the Commission withdraw its proposal. Parliament's 1st reading position is forwarded to the Council.
Preparatory work in Council runs in parallel with the 1st reading in Parliament, but Council may only formally conduct its 1st reading based on Parliament's position. Council can: accept the EP position, in which case the legislative act is adopted; or adopt changes to Parliament's position, leading to a Council's 1st reading position, which is sent to Parliament for a 2nd reading.
The European Parliament has 3 (with a possible extension to 4) months to examine Council's position. The Council position goes first to the responsible committee, which prepares a recommendation for Parliament's 2nd reading. Plenary votes on the recommendation including possible albeit limited amendments. There are 4 possible outcomes to a 2nd reading: Parliament approves Council's position and the act is adopted; Parliament fails to take a decision within the time limit, in which case the act is adopted as amended by Council in its 1st reading; Parliament rejects Council's 1st reading position, in which case the act is not adopted and the procedure is ended; Parliament proposes amendments to Council's 1st reading position and forwards its position to Council for a 2nd reading.
Council has 3 (with a possible extension to 4) months to examine Parliament's 2nd reading position. It is also informed about the European Commission's position on Parliament's 2nd reading amendments. The Council either approves all Parliament's amendments, in which case the legislative act is adopted, or it does not approve all the amendments. In the latter case, the President of the Council, in agreement with the Parliament President, convenes a meeting of the Conciliation Committee.
Within 6 (with a possible extension to 8) weeks of the Council's refusal to adopt Parliament's 2nd reading position, the Presidents of the Council and European Parliament convene the Conciliation Committee, with equal numbers of MEPs and Council representatives. The Conciliation Committee has 6 weeks (with a possible extension to 8) to decide on a joint text based on the 2nd reading positions of Parliament and Council. If the Conciliation Committee does not approve a joint text, the proposed legislative act falls and the procedure is ended. If the Conciliation Committee approves a joint text, the text is forwarded for a 3rd reading to the European Parliament and the Council.
The joint text is sent simultaneously to Parliament and Council for approval. There is no specific order in which the co-legislators must decide. They have 6 (or 8 if jointly agreed) weeks to decide and they cannot modify the text. In Parliament, the vote on the joint text is preceded by a debate in plenary. If Parliament and Council approve the joint text, the legislative proposal is adopted. If one or both rejects it, or does not respond in time, the legislation falls and the procedure is ended. It can only be restarted with a new proposal from the Commission.
Be early. Being involved in a dossier early shows knowledge of the dossier and willingness to be engaged. Policy-makers appreciate this greatly.
Be reliable. Policy-makers have limited time and need to be credible vis-à-vis their colleagues. Understandably, they listen to people more who have been more reliable – and tend not to forget mistakes.
Be honest. Policy-makers eventually forgive - but not forget - mistakes. They neither forgive nor forget being misled.
Be understanding. Know and make allowances for the practical and political options available to a policymaker. Politics is the art of the possible. Being asked for what you can’t deliver is unsurprisingly not flattering for a policy-maker.
Be nice! However important a particular dossier is, being aggressive will never be productive and will limit your options the next time you need to communicate with that policy-maker.
Be thorough. Policy-makers appreciate expert and complete analysis.
Be brief
Be consistent. You need to ensure that your analysis and policy are clear and consistent. It is also important to liaise with other, similar, civil society groups to ensure that the message is not diluted by confusion.
Be personal. Policy-makers get zillions of communications from interest groups. Non-personalised messages have less impact.
Be a bridge builder. Alliances are crucial, even with individuals, groups and industries that you compete with on other issues.