This document provides information about becoming authorized to use learning concepts developed by Relation Technologies. The authorization process involves a two-day course to learn the theory and tools associated with a given concept. Authorization allows consultants to expand their competencies and integrate the dynamic tools into their teaching, coaching, and consulting. Relation Technologies creates learning designs and architectures based on theoretical foundations to make change management, learning, and development more engaging and effective.

1. Authorization
Become authorized to facilitate one or more
of Relation Technologies’ concepts
DO YOU NEED A TOOL ..? for use in large groups or for the coa-
• That makes your participants buy ching of smaller units. In addition there
into the game and engage, becau- is an online simulator for each concept,
se they are met by recognizable where the progression of the game
challenges and challenging options. can be followed virtually, and thus the
• That can be adapted to different complexities of the process are made
environments and groups, from transparent.
change management on organiza-
tion level to the ability of individual THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
employees to work with focused We build our concepts on important
citizen communication. theoreticians within the field that the day course, where you are introduced to
• That can function in addition to the concept addresses. In addition, through the theory behind the product, and you
tools already in your toolbox. time, we have developed our concepts learn to facilitate the various learning
in cooperation with our clients. If our tools associated with the product. It has
MULTIPLE PLATFORMS TO PLAY ON client has already worked with change been our experience that a two-day
Relation Technologies’ learning con- theory, management theory or systemic course is necessary to ensure that the
cepts, such as Mindsetter, 6 Styles and or appreciative approaches of their own, individual consultant later feels confi-
PublicProfessional, are typically organi- we have combined this with our con- dent in using the learning technologies
zed around a physical representation. cepts, and thus adapted our concepts in their own teaching. With your autho-
For example, that could be a circular to work with approaches that have rization, you gain access to a new set
board with game pieces representing achieved wide popularity with many of dynamic tools usable for teaching,
stakeholders. As a participant, you are businesses and organizations. development processes, coaching and
engaged through hands, eyes, dialogue much more. The tools are based on a
and reflections. The physical represen- THE AUTHORIZATION COURSE solid foundation of professional, specia-
tation comes in different sizes, suitable Authorization takes place with a two- list knowledge that can aid in evolving
Copyright Relation Technologies. Allrights reserved. Contact Relation Technologies for information
www.relationtechnologies.com about the retail-network
info@relationtechnologies.com Telephone: +45 7070 2030

2. the way you work with change manage- Several of our external consultants business and organization development.
ment, as consultant, as educator or with experience that our concepts enable an Our hallmarks are that we transform
your own processes of change. The tools entirely new way of offering their cli- theory into practice by grounding our
give you new methods to work with, ents an innovative and retentive tool for concepts in concrete tools – physical
and can help strengthen your profile as handling both their own change needs or virtual. Our concepts are used for
a consultant. and those of their organizations. longer development or education
From our internal consultants in busi- processes or for shorter workshops and
WHO DO THE CONCEPTS ADDRESS? nesses and public organizations, we consultations, as well as for e-learning.
As users of our concepts we have both hear that our concepts help create a Our concepts have roused enthusiasm
independent consultants, consulting common platform and a common lan- around the world, and today, five years
firms and internal consultants in busi- guage that help the organization handle after launching our first concept, we
nesses and organizations. changes, diverging interests, resistance are represented on five continents. The
etc. mission of Relation Technologies is to
WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF make it easier, more exciting and more
AUTHORIZATION? Leaders experience that our concepts effective to work with learning, as well
By becoming authorized for one of our give them a way to facilitate proces- as taking learning with you – in many
products, you gain the option of using ses of change in a management team, ways. We are always at work develo-
the associated learning technologies in handle resistance in an employee team ping new concepts.
your teaching or consulting. and handle processes across structures.
For the individual consultants, authoriza- Are you interested in being authorized?
tion for one or more of our concepts can RELATION TECHNOLOGIES Contact: info@relationtechnologies.com
e
ership styl
be an expansion of their competences Relation Technologies is a highly spe-
lead
that supports and grounds the processes cialized business that creates learning Read more at:
emocratic
that they already work with. design and learning architecture for www.relationtechnologies.com
The d Democratic
style
e Increase:
Visionary styl
lity
Increase: Responsibi
l climate
*
ganisationa
Direction Team spirit
Corre lation to or +60
Hope
e
-60 +60 Coaching styl
atic Increase:
Flexibility The democr
Commandi
ng style: Competenc
y
+60 leadership
3
-60
Responsibi
lity style Innovation
Increase: Involvement
+60 alism nt
Commitme
3
-60 Profession
Standards
gency Adaptation
Sense of ur
n or
y ow +60
dighed ing m
-60
af nødven
Rewards nicat
mmu
Oplevelse
s
rs at co y idea +60 Pace setting
style
stakeholde rnal I am
good
-60
le’s vi
sionar ship
s e Increase:
al and ekste Affiliative styl
Clarity tion
peop
e key intern ingen?
rela ease: Result
5
other -60 ndly Stilen i en SæIncr st
Who are th
+60
for for? dr
gean g frie nships tnresting Ambiti ons
rne aktører an
nt Tru
ge? of the ch Engageme ildin ndly relatio
of the chan em er cein ralenecessity andringen erke-d-
ntthe ekste
2
nø u
on b frie Inte
the sta
4
-60 focus ilding
How wi
•ll Hvey expla
th re, chan to
klatheat for ge Total influen
ce I on bu rt in
Den RammeS
vil de for of
ættenDe Stil
2
s
ency I focu st take pa
Den tilknyt
e is an
• Hvordthe urg
tenDe Stil
How visibl ion concerns
nates mu
dringen er
Den inDDRagenDe
subordi
e persp -
Stil
ne, at foran ec
4 ”Formålet er …”
at
Den RåDgivenDe
think my unit ”Jeg vil gerne lære
Informvendig?nligtdifferences between th
Stil
for aktører for our
I
holders? or sy be er det vervejelser
dig at kende”
the goals ”Hvad synes du?”
Hv there ions-o defining
IdEAl SElf
”mit råd til dig
• t at nes er …”
Why migh rmkeholders? llem aktører
**
fodvendig?
In nø sta nces REAl SElf
e elt forskel th
aske sta th
tives of th orforpossibly telld by ho
ldersme
e stakehoat lders?
the
Underlyin g compete 2 Learning goa
ls
der eventu ke
petence
Den tempoSættenD
Social com
e Stil
1-5 years
ns are being
Hv can er
Actions
Den UDvikle
nDe Stil
petence
• tio
What ques ns levelser?t? tø is ?
ilke akat rer ne,
Den pRoblem
What sig Personal com 0-6 months
løSenDe Stil
aktører ”nu skal der ske Milestones
stillet ssahv • Wh
op t urgen bli isr tentielt fortælle
Den inSpiReRenDe
ce af ry?
e noget” ”Du kan mere,
al competenc
Stil
end du er
no 6-12 monthsklarer
change is spørgsmålkayve it ne
reness
Profession bevidst om”
• Wh n po
Social awa
dig? • How
er- ”Det
Hvilke ilke tegn ay? of and und jeg”
•eHv ange?
INDDRAGENDE
e er nødven n nødvendig?
Awareness
working tod
”nu skal du bare
ch ss s and
TILKNYTTENDE REFLEKSIONSK
Self awarene the emotion høre”
What is th
ORT
things ikk
ydringenare orfor tion have to
standing of
INSPIRERENDE REFLEKSIONSK
of and un-
ORT
er de e Awareness
RÅDGIVENDE REFLEKSIONSK
th foran
) knowledg
rer på i
others
at e wa
ORT
of ones own actions of
dres en? Hv isa
Professional
REFLEKSIONSK
wrong with er forandoingthe organ de, tingene funge Kotter -
essions derstanding ones own klaDDe
ORT
about prof
Knowledge
Hvad w fast
glo- emotions and
field and of
5. SEKVENS
n må Source: John isatio
0%
ho
Awareness
much and er der galt med de
and practise ses
høver organ l relations stren gths/weaknes 25%
hurtigt be
bal and loca
50%
Hvad
get og hvor
75%
change? can Kilde: John Kotter
MÅL
anding 100%
me What
HED
ural underst
dag? Hvor answer? •
ÅBEN
ER ÅBE
• Cult
HÅ
1
B
dre sig? rtant to
N
po
nen at ænare im
OP
tions n
? Hvad ka
TIM
BO
What ques
IST
NU
give svar på
ISK
4. SEKVENS
SK
1
OR
vigtigst at
s/abilities
T
LUK
you tel l? l er Social skill s that
KER
to act in way
e spørgsmå
UN
The ability
OP
DE
onses
Hvilk
AR
Self control
TA
RS
opriate resp
GE
SV
ØG
R ST
to control and create appr
YR
EN
AN
ING
? 07.06 The ability
DE
du fortælle 04/11/09
reperto action from others
Professional
RET
ME
es- motivate own
DV
to use prof ication
IRK
NIN
LUK
• Commun
ER
The ability
KER
ledge in a
G
Blanchard spirit
FOK
DE
AF
sional know
USE
LTA
• Team e
MO
Source: Ken
RET
Action
3. SEKVENS
GE
indd 1
R IKK
tise field
DL
ip styl
e leadersh• Cooperation
E
ØS
relevant prac
rt Kotter_V3.
VÆG
The affiliativ
ELS
IND
- CoachingKo
ET
input needs
group.
is also a way of focusing
MindSetter competence ip style
Affiliative style dialogue But in its way the style
Blanchard
KAO
Feedback and
n, TISK
• facilitatoriative leadersh
leader’s more on recognitio
ly permit that
E
of building
Kilde: Ken
The affiliative creating a more
IKK
a ‘people first’ can accidental ces are not
KAN
trademark is and thereby
The affil
culture. This poor performan
it becomes attitude. in this open feedback effective
is style, where to reflect that works style is especially criticised.
that the style leader’s ability The leader creating team harmony
LIDT
and values the is on in building
KAN
create in the about what style focuses moral in the
port
s from work- designed to on and talk that emotional and increasing E
harmony and
D
The experience have shown leader and the relation
help and sup
R IKK
I NØ
relation between going on in
ing with 6styles all six d whether the bonds. RS
TÅ
of The unintende is crucial to
People first
or
SELV
Jeg er perd s for
FO
that the effect
ER
employee.
R
the intended
KAN
ce:
Key go son
MSE
styles depends expression style affects
ING
effect is an d. Below you one senten
The style in
leadership the the style
character of of the risk that the unintende the affiliative
on both the
BRE
til
it is the
MESTR
2. SEKVENS
can read about unin- ET
er det bedst at få borgeren til at
as the way contains of
influencing
style as well that are not style’s IRR
To create clarity relation in ways
RV
ts, HRB.
leadership FO
being used. . The intended ER
that gets resul
we have wanted in leadership d ef- tended effect.
on these effects values of the bonds
concepts to
the unintende virtues and
Creates harmony ershiprecognition
and emotional
its
etences take
Intended and
e at gøre i for
added two the
OV
can find on
Lead interest and
ions.
den situatio stå, hvad der
effect and
Goleman: leader shows connections between people
contradict style you
ET
fects are not of a total
emotional comp
styles: intended
in Danielthe style
Modus operandi*
ER
sheet.
står i.
OR
effect. They are more leadership front of the The ISK
unintended
ts presented een leadership The leader is and
creates IST
BL
SP
effect of the The form of The leader
style empathetic
the AL
The intended reflection on RE
measured resul
PÅ
IK
n, vedkomm
the depths
R PÅ
style contains bonds
betw style focuses on
ER
of people
ic picture ofeffort andTechnologies. The link
and emotional The wellbeing
Creates harmony results
NGE
ende
little on Security
model isd formgraph is too ‘soft’ by his/her ionrelations and cannot
Social contact:
Modus operandi a The leader
focuses too
ts, HRB.
The
Relations t, security and
impor-
T
* TheRisk of experience deveThe leader is inhibitedRelatclose ership that gets resul
HÆ
loped by
Closeness:
OR
of attachmen
an experience
model is
By creating
an: Lead work relations
SK
The leader resonance
** The The style creates …
l Golem important value in tance each other
NU
execute
in Danieas being the most and relations the em-
E
– We support
ND
Creating trust
starting point
are you?
People interest – How
BO
by
Jeg bruger god tid på, at lade borgeren selv finde
e on job satisfaction
RE
The style focuses
indirectly
that exceeds The style motivates Empathetic important!
Dependenc attachment n – You are
KØ
a degree of Appreciatio
1. SEKVENS
By welcoming
ER
on
T PÅ
at risk of creat- ployee’s limits
to me. Asking questions Being in contact!
The style is e – I need you
to be close
push my-
ates
Showing interest:
løsninger til sin situation.
The style communic
FAR
e I must not of people UD
ing dissonanc Creating dependenc small demands – g the importance world SK
or too through Recognisin and feel the ER
Giving too few
HAR
potentially
The style is experience FRE OV
ing by independently! The way employees t, Feedback MDRIF
demotivat self! to act more , Attachmen
– I would like The style listens
to
Job satisfaction is required T
Being clingy group members
on effort t between
To place demands When attachmen to cooperate
groups have stressful
out in the y develop- The style is
best When different motivated through
The style leaves To challenge needs for competenc have to be
ation ’ non-spoken When employees
communic The employees on
at risk of ignor- ment or re-orientati
times
The style is in the relation community
.
Lack of effort the closeness A sense of
ing will challenge at Dialogue
Subjects that The style aims Openness,
3
MÅL
standards
sets too low the effort Which is harmonic meaningful
When the leader does not set goals for culture attitudes
poorly effort
The style creates Which is personally emotions and
g, ENDE
The style functions When the leader does not correct for poor can speak of
tinREFLEKSIONSK
a personal
In which one relation through ORT
usere på
When the leader the power
to even out
By striving ORT
REFLEKSIONSK
Unclear roles
fok
to power UDVIKL
eren til at
creating The style relates
style risks Inefficiency closeness
ORT DE
REFLEKSIONSK PROBLEMLØSEN
The * sensitivity,
y/lack of originality closeness* honest feedback,
2
Expressed
Dependenc
ORT E
RAMMESÆTTEN borg
kindness, sharing,
TEMPOSÆTTEND
driven by
is too ‘familiar’ effort and results leader The style is REFLEKSIONSK
d til at få det bedre.
Expressing
creates That not enough oriented towards
The style potentially That is creating authority
around the
the em-
(in the leader) considerati
on
and keep the
offer of closeness DE
on the relation
Jeg er go
difficulties
That can have to obligate To follow up
culture personal closeness the
y uses the
dre sig til
Accidentall interaction The style obligates
power utilisa- potential unwanted
The potential ployee to a leader The Humanist
der kan æn
style * a metaphor
tion of the Not-wanted
closeness* conflict The style as The Familiar
overseeing reserved, avoiding without violating The Mediator
The style risks ) Being reluctant, to challenge
that are difficult
(in the employee With employees
capturing closeness relations
The style risks the established that are ‘stuck’ in close
the leader With employees
The Humanist
a metaphor
The style as The Familiar tm
12
6styles
The Mediator All rights to
n of the six
leader-
belong to Relation
. The categorisatio HayGroup. s.
Technologies by the company Technologie
by Relation
style is developed originally developed by Will Schutz.
of the leadership foundation,
The description its starting point in
a theoretical FIRO-B, developed
* in the theory
ship styles
takes personal need
fundamental
refers to a
** The term
Copyright Relation Technologies. Allrights reserved. Contact Relation Technologies for information
www.relationtechnologies.com about the retail-network
info@relationtechnologies.com Telephone: +45 7070 2030