Results of support to district planning, M&E and district-level partner coordination

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

0 likes•41 views

This document summarizes the results of support provided to district planning, monitoring and evaluation, and district-level partner coordination in Malawi's health sector. Key achievements included supporting national and district-level planning workshops, reviewing district implementation plans, and improving data quality and use for decision making. As a result, new planning guidelines were developed, data quality indicators doubled or increased, and partner coordination improved in several districts. Moving forward, successful district practices could be shared, and greater focus on gender is still needed in planning.

Government & Nonprofit

RESULTS OF SUPPORT TO DISTRICT
PLANNING, M&E AND DISTRICT-LEVEL
PARTNER COORDINATION
Malawi Health Sector Programme –
Technical Assistance Component
21st September 2018, Knowledge Café

Planning: Key Achievements
• Participated and supported national
level planning and consultation
workshops
• Supported DIP reviews at district
level
• Supported zonal peer reviews to
finalise DIPs

Planning: Key Outcomes
• New DIP guidelines
• Inputs into HSSP2
• Data used to inform planning at DIP
annual and quarterly reviews
• DIP peer reviews improved quality of
planning

M&E: Key Achievements
• HMIS reviews, supervision and mentoring at 3
levels (zonal, district and facility)
• Direct district supervision (DDS) and mentoring
• Data management capacity enhancement and
orientation targeted at:
– DHMT members
– Programme coordinators
– Facility staff
• Increased capacity is clearly shown in the
quantitative evaluation data on the next slide.

M&E: Key Outcomes
Indicator
Indicator scores
Baseline
2015
2016 2017 2018
% of health facilities in focus Districts
providing satisfactory coverage and
quality of data (timeliness only)
24%
(9/37)
57%
(25/44)
50.0%
(23/46)
48%
(22/46)
% of health facilities in focus Districts
providing satisfactory coverage and
quality of data (accuracy only)
7%
(2/28)
7%
(3/44)
23.9%
(11/46)
50%
(23/46)
Between 2015 and 2018:
 Accuracy of data increased from 7% to 50%
 Timeliness of data doubled

District level partner
coordination: Key outcomes
Indicator
Indicator scores
Baseline
2015
2016 2017 2018
Number of focus Districts reporting
improved health partner co-ordination
including a focus on gender-related
activities
0/6 0/8 3/8 5/8
Number of focus Districts reporting
improved health partner co-ordination (less
focus on gender-activities)
0/6 8/8 8/8 8/8

Ways Forward
• District councils were empowered to have control
over partner organisations to achieve well-
coordinated health sector interventions. Can this be
scaled up?
• Rumphi, Chiradzulu and Thyolo districts performed
well on data quality in 2018. Can these good
practices be used for learning purposes?
• Inadequate focus on gender and equity in district
and sector plans needs to be addressed at both
national and district level.

Thank you! Photo credit: 2011 Sally Zweimueller,
courtesy of Photoshare

This document outlines the key aspects of monitoring and evaluating Active Labor Market Measures (ALMM) projects. It discusses the types of information needed for monitoring, including inputs, progress, results, impacts, and management. Performance is monitored at both the impact and process levels. Key monitoring documents include quarterly reports on metrics, finances, participants, and post-program employment statuses. Evaluation examines outcomes like impacts and costs, as well as the process of program delivery and management. Evaluations should be conducted by independent internal or external parties, and include both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The goal is to assess progress, beneficiaries, impacts, efficiency, and make recommendations for improvements.

SDF04_ ToR for District Officer MEL & GA

MahinA Arefin

The District Officer (MEL &GA) position is responsible for tracking inputs, outputs, processes and constraints of projects to generate learning and monitor performance. The position requires conducting periodic analysis and frequent field visits to project areas to assess strengths, weaknesses, bottlenecks and outcomes. Key responsibilities include monitoring key performance indicators, addressing issues, conducting surveys and evaluations, ensuring high quality data, and generating lessons learned. The position prepares regular progress reports and helps improve projects based on monitoring findings. Required qualifications include a postgraduate degree, 5 years of relevant experience, strong analytical and reporting skills, and knowledge of rural development and participatory approaches.

Monitoring and Evaluation for e-Governance Projects

Lalengzuala Zualtea

Strategy of Implementing Plans

Ruth Senorin

The document discusses strategies for implementing plans and monitoring their progress. It emphasizes that implementation turns strategies into actions to achieve objectives and that a strategy without proper implementation is ineffective. It also stresses the importance of having the right people, resources, structure, systems, and culture in place to support implementation. Regular monitoring is needed to track progress, identify challenges, and allow for adjustments to ensure plans remain relevant and effective. Evaluation provides in-depth assessments of what worked and did not work to help improve future programming, policies, and strategies.

Monitoring and Evaluation of Plan

Ruth Senorin

Monitoring and evaluation provide real-time information on project implementation and more in-depth assessments, respectively. Monitoring checks progress toward goals and identifies issues to inform adjustments, while evaluation assesses what worked and didn't work independently. Both are integral to program management. Effective monitoring and evaluation establish what will be monitored and evaluated, responsibilities, methods, resources, and timing of activities to validate the program's logic and encourage improvements.

Rammeverk: Quality reviews in Statistics Norway

Nordisk statistikermøte 2013

Statistics Norway conducted quality reviews of 18 statistics to improve quality and efficiency. The reviews mapped processes, identified weaknesses and inefficiencies, and proposed improvements. Over 140 improvement measures were identified, with 60 measures completed so far for 9 of the 18 statistics. The reviews provided a useful examination of statistical processes and documentation, and identified areas for streamlining and cost savings. Statistics Norway found the quality review approach to be a cost-effective way to evaluate processes and plans to continue reviews focused on related statistical themes.

Findings of the application of the quality checklist for monitoring reports, ...

Support for Improvement in Governance and Management SIGMA

This document provides findings from applying a quality checklist to annual monitoring reports on public administration reform strategies. It summarizes the key quality issues identified and provides data on how well recent reports addressed various quality criteria. The document concludes by emphasizing areas that could be improved in 2021 reports and encouraging a commitment to meeting higher quality standards. It also includes discussion questions for a virtual roundtable on challenges in preparing such reports and monitoring reform implementation.

HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS

Abraham Ncunge

The document provides an overview and analysis of 13 annual monitoring reports on public administration reform (PAR) strategies from 7 countries in 2020. It identifies both strengths and weaknesses in the quality and content of the reports based on SIGMA's evaluation checklist. Overall, most reports complied with basic quality standards but many lacked financial data, quantitative progress indicators, and specific conclusions and recommendations. Aggregate overviews were often missing key information like progress under objectives, budget execution, and trends in outcome indicators. Chapters on policy objectives provided limited discussion of failures, targets, and next steps. The document concludes with suggestions for improvement in 2021, emphasizing financial information, outcome indicators, statistics by institution, clear implementation statuses, civil society

United Way or Erie County - Programs, Program Monitoring and Evaluation, and ...

Via Evaluation

Caroline Taggart, Senior Evaluator, was invited by the United Way of Buffalo & Erie County to present at the organization’s Board Leadership Training program. Caroline’s presentation covered the importance and general tenets of Program Monitoring and Evaluation, with an emphasis on questions non-profit organization’s Board Members can ask to encourage their organization’s engagement in these activities to ensure quality program delivery and maximum impact.

Summary, quality of annual monitoring reports on the implementation of PAR-re...

Support for Improvement in Governance and Management SIGMA

monitoring and evaluation

Tarek Sallam

The document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of health programs, defining monitoring as the routine collection of data to track progress towards objectives, while evaluation assesses the impact of a program by measuring outcomes at baseline and endline using a control group. It provides guidance on developing M&E plans, including describing programs and expected outcomes, identifying indicators, data collection sources and schedules, and disseminating findings to inform decision-making.

Using Data to Improve the Delivery of Civil Legal Aid Services

Legal Services Corporation

USAID Perspectives on Monitoring and Evaluation and Health Information Needs ...

MEASURE Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation presentatios

athanzeer

Monitoring and evaluation are important for e-governance projects to track their outputs and outcomes. Monitoring relates to tracking project progress and deliverables against the project plan. Evaluation assesses achievement of objectives and provides recommendations. Outputs are tangible deliverables like processes, systems, and infrastructure. Outcomes are intended results like increased efficiency and quality services. A monitoring and evaluation framework should define indicators to measure outputs and outcomes. This allows evaluating project performance and assessing progress toward business goals.

Difference between monitoring and evaluation

Doreen Ty

Monitoring involves tracking project performance and progress toward goals during implementation to ensure accountability. It answers whether things are being done right and allows for timely management decisions. Evaluation assesses efficiency, impact and relevance after completion to judge the overall merits and determine if the right things were done. Both aim to improve projects, but monitoring focuses on day-to-day management during implementation while evaluation provides longer-term perspective at critical points like midway or after completion.

Africa RISING West Africa logframe and indicators

africa-rising

F&I Laura Hillier - Business Intelligence II: Research Impact

CASRAI

The Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) was created in 1997 to build Canada's capacity for world-class research and technology development. The CFI measures the results and impact of funded projects and institutions at multiple levels, from individual project reports to institution-wide outcome measurement studies. Data is collected at the most granular level and combined to allow for analysis of the research system as a whole. The CFI collaborates with funded institutions and other research funders to reduce reporting burdens and gain a system-level perspective on research performance and outcomes. Challenges include measuring organizational and research performance across individual institutions and systems.

Monitoring and Evaluation Policy

Komal Zahra

This document outlines a Monitoring and Evaluation Policy developed by Komal Zahra for HAADI. The policy aims to establish a results-focused and accountable approach to monitoring, evaluating and learning from HAADI's compact and threshold programs. It requires the development of detailed M&E plans for each program that identify indicators, data collection methods, evaluation questions and responsibilities. The M&E plans will be used to regularly monitor progress, evaluate impacts, and ensure accountability. The policy also establishes procedures for modifying, approving and reporting on M&E plans over time, as well as conducting data quality reviews and evaluations of the policy itself.

Monitoring and evaluation Learning and Development

SESH SUKHDEO

The document outlines steps for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) including: understanding existing documentation and systems, gathering M&E information, enhancing stakeholder buy-in, preparing a detailed M&E plan with indicators, baselines and targets, establishing an implementation team, providing training, and closely monitoring implementation against indicators. It also discusses key concepts in M&E like the difference between monitoring and evaluation, levels of evaluation, and participatory M&E.

Introduction to monitoring and evaluation

Meshack Lomoywara

Monitoring involves systematically collecting information about activities, products, services, users, and external factors affecting an organization. Evaluation involves making judgements about the value and effectiveness of an organization. Monitoring and evaluation are important for organizations to learn and improve, and to be accountable. They involve planning what to monitor and evaluate, collecting monitoring data, conducting evaluations, and using findings to learn and improve.

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Manish Thapa

Monitoring process

Dr.Shazia Zamir

Process monitoring falls under program evaluation and assesses how program activities are implemented. It involves regularly tracking implementation through methods like reviewing reports and field observations. Process monitoring aims to improve efficiency and inform reprogramming. It answers questions about what is being done, by whom, for whom, how, when, and where. The information collected through process monitoring can then be used by managers, donors, governments, and communities to improve implementation and inform future programs. A successful process monitoring framework involves determining the purpose and uses of monitoring, developing measurable objectives, evaluation questions, collecting credible evidence, analyzing the information, and reporting findings.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Ahmadzay

This document provides an introduction to monitoring and evaluation for interns. It defines monitoring as the routine collection and analysis of project data to provide information on progress, while evaluation assesses a project's achievements against its objectives and identifies lessons learned. Several tools for monitoring and evaluation are described, including Gantt charts, timelines, and logical frameworks. The presentation emphasizes that monitoring and evaluation are important project management processes that help ensure quality, allow for course corrections, and provide lessons for future projects.

Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program Evaluation

INGENAES

This document summarizes a presentation on program evaluation for NGO partner organizations. It defines program evaluation as the systematic process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to make necessary decisions. There are two main types of evaluations: process evaluations, which verify proper implementation, and outcome evaluations, which assess a program's effectiveness and impact. The presentation outlines key steps for developing an evaluation plan, including determining the purpose and audience, identifying evaluation questions, choosing a methodology, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. It also discusses important considerations like the appropriate evaluator and presents an activity for participants to develop strategies, outcomes, and discuss an evaluation plan for one of their program objectives.

Training on Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) of Adaptation and the NAP process

NAP Events

Presented by: Timo Leiter & Julia Olivier 3c. Developing (sub)national adaptation M&E systems Participants will be taken through a short training course on the basic steps of developing a national adaptation M&E system with specific reference to the process to formulate and implement NAPs. The training will be based on the guidebook “Developing national adaptation M&E systems” developed by GIZ in collaboration with the LEG and the Adaptation Committee.

Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...

Barb Knittel

Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD

OECD Governance

Group Two Presentation tr.pptx at mountains of the moon university

wyclifkugonza

What's hot

Nokuzola Mamabolo - FHI360, South Africa

Regional AIDS Training Network

Quality of the monitoring reports, key lessons from 2020 and suggestions for ...

Support for Improvement in Governance and Management SIGMA

United Way or Erie County - Programs, Program Monitoring and Evaluation, and ...

Via Evaluation

Summary, quality of annual monitoring reports on the implementation of PAR-re...

Support for Improvement in Governance and Management SIGMA

monitoring and evaluation

Tarek Sallam

Using Data to Improve the Delivery of Civil Legal Aid Services

Legal Services Corporation

USAID Perspectives on Monitoring and Evaluation and Health Information Needs ...

MEASURE Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation presentatios

athanzeer

Difference between monitoring and evaluation

Doreen Ty

Africa RISING West Africa logframe and indicators

africa-rising

F&I Laura Hillier - Business Intelligence II: Research Impact

CASRAI

Monitoring and Evaluation Policy

Komal Zahra

Monitoring and evaluation Learning and Development

SESH SUKHDEO

Introduction to monitoring and evaluation

Meshack Lomoywara

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Manish Thapa

Monitoring process

Dr.Shazia Zamir

Monitoring and Evaluation

Ahmadzay

Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program Evaluation

INGENAES

Training on Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) of Adaptation and the NAP process

NAP Events

Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...

Barb Knittel

What's hot (20)

Nokuzola Mamabolo - FHI360, South Africa

Quality of the monitoring reports, key lessons from 2020 and suggestions for ...

United Way or Erie County - Programs, Program Monitoring and Evaluation, and ...

Summary, quality of annual monitoring reports on the implementation of PAR-re...

monitoring and evaluation

Using Data to Improve the Delivery of Civil Legal Aid Services

USAID Perspectives on Monitoring and Evaluation and Health Information Needs ...

Monitoring and evaluation presentatios

Difference between monitoring and evaluation

Africa RISING West Africa logframe and indicators

F&I Laura Hillier - Business Intelligence II: Research Impact

Monitoring and Evaluation Policy

Monitoring and evaluation Learning and Development

Introduction to monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring process

Monitoring and Evaluation

Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program Evaluation

Training on Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) of Adaptation and the NAP process

Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...

Similar to Results of support to district planning, M&E and district-level partner coordination

Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD

OECD Governance

Group Two Presentation tr.pptx at mountains of the moon university

wyclifkugonza

M-E systems.ppt

Asabet2

This document discusses establishing and strengthening monitoring and evaluation systems for national tuberculosis programs. It identifies the key elements of a comprehensive M&E system including management, goals and objectives, indicators, data collection, analysis and dissemination. It describes a 5 step process to develop an M&E system: 1) situation analysis, 2) develop an M&E plan, 3) establish an M&E unit, 4) implement the plan, and 5) establish quality control mechanisms. The document emphasizes linking the M&E system to program goals, collecting complete data, building human capacity, and using data for decision making.

Early Childhood Development Conditional Grant Monitoring System 26 june 2014

Khulisa Management Services

Almm monitoring and evaluation tools draft[1]acm sir revised

Alberto Mico

Monitoring and evaluation tools are necessary to assess the success of ALMM-funded projects. A monitoring system should gather information on programme inputs, progress towards objectives, results and impacts on target groups. Evaluation determines whether objectives were achieved and why. It assesses outcomes, processes, costs, benefits and replicability. Both monitoring and evaluation require defining indicators, collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data, and reporting findings to stakeholders. Regular interim and final evaluations provide opportunities for improvement and ensure accountability.

Monitoring and evaluation for hiv

Jacqueline Kobusingye

This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation for HIV/AIDS programs. It discusses key concepts like monitoring, evaluation, and surveillance. It also describes the different levels of measurement from inputs and processes to outcomes and impacts. The document provides examples of core indicators that can be used to monitor HIV/AIDS programs and discusses best practices for developing a strong monitoring and evaluation system, including having clear goals and objectives, a set of indicators, a data collection and analysis plan, and a dissemination plan.

M & E Fundamentals.

PrestonAssociates

Dr Brian Mutie on basics of Monitoring and Evaluation

Brian Mutie Ph.D.. (Governance)

This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation (M&E). It defines monitoring as routine data collection on program implementation, while evaluation assesses program impact. M&E aims to inform decisions, support planning, manage programs, and ensure accountability. Effective M&E requires defining indicators to track progress, establishing systems to collect data, building stakeholder participation, and developing M&E capacity. Proper incentives and feedback loops are also needed to create demand for and use of M&E information.

The Basics of Monitoring, Evaluation and Supervision of Health Services in Nepal

Deepak Karki

Final implementation report presentation 14 august 2014

kaleylemottee

The document provides an overview and summary of findings from monitoring the implementation of an Early Childhood Development Conditional Grant in South Africa between 2002-2004. Key findings include: - Provincial and district officials were generally satisfied with the training provided and demonstrated relevant learning, though application and impact on organizational performance was only partially achieved. - The monitoring and support system was implemented, but many sites were only visited once and officials' workloads made frequent visits difficult. - The conditional grant was delivered to over 4,300 sites, though some sites did not receive subsidies or resource kits on time. - Sites showed progress, but many still required extensive assistance across several implementation levels including finance, health, HIV/AIDS awareness, and

M&e services

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture

This document outlines the monitoring and evaluation functions, tools, and reporting strategies for youth agribusiness projects. It discusses that M&E involves routine data collection to track project implementation and assess outcomes and impacts. The key target audiences of M&E reports are governments, institutions, private sectors, and NGOs. Reporting will be done using electronic M&E tools adapted for youth agribusiness projects and will include baseline surveys, progress reports, and annual reports. Moving forward, the document recommends tracking project performance at different levels, linking activities to an MEL platform, and documenting results and lessons learned.

IFPRI - Results and Impact Management System (RIMS)

International Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office

International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) organized a three days Training Workshop on ‘Monitoring and Evaluation Methods’ on 10-12 March 2014 in New Delhi, India. The workshop is part of an IFAD grant to IFPRI to partner in the Monitoring and Evaluation component of the ongoing projects in the region. The three day workshop is intended to be a collaborative affair between project directors, M & E leaders and M & E experts. As part of the workshop, detailed interaction will take place on the evaluation routines involving sampling, questionnaire development, data collection and management techniques and production of an evaluation report. The workshop is designed to better understand the M & E needs of various projects that are at different stages of implementation. Both the generic issues involved in M & E programs as well as project specific needs will be addressed in the workshop. The objective of the workshop is to come up with a work plan for M & E domains in the IFAD projects and determine the possibilities of collaboration between IFPRI and project leaders.

Botswana’s Integration of Health Data Quality Assurance Into Standard Operati...

MEASURE Evaluation

The document describes the development of data quality assurance procedures for Botswana's health ministry (MoH) in collaboration with MEASURE Evaluation. Key deliverables included standard operating procedures for data quality, a routine data quality assessment tool customized for Botswana, and a data quality curriculum and training workshops. The process took 16 months and $300,000. It established guidelines for ensuring quality data collection and use at service delivery, district, and national levels in Botswana.

37851 101218095128-phpapp02

oyuku denis

This document outlines monitoring and evaluation of health services. It discusses that monitoring and evaluation are key to improve performance and show if a service is achieving its goals. M&E identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas needing revision. The document distinguishes between monitoring, which assesses progress against criteria, and evaluation, which determines if needs and results are being achieved. Evaluation can focus on various aspects like inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes and impacts. It also discusses prospective versus retrospective evaluation, internal versus external evaluation, and provides guidelines for planning and conducting an evaluation including developing questions, indicators, collecting and analyzing data.

Findings from the REACHOUT Bangladesh team

REACHOUTCONSORTIUMSLIDES

The document provides an overview of the REACHOUT Bangladesh project which aimed to strengthen the capacity of close-to-community health providers through improving the referral system for Menstrual Regulation services. The summary is: The REACHOUT Bangladesh project worked with implementing partners over multiple phases from 2013-2018 to improve the referral system and capacity of community health workers in Bangladesh. Through training, supportive supervision, and use of referral cards, the project aimed to enhance the skills of formal and informal providers in counseling and referring clients for Menstrual Regulation services. Research found the interventions improved provider motivation and referral practices over time. The project also focused on sustainability through embedding activities in partner organizations and building individual and institutional research capacity.

Mornitoring and Evaluation Plans.Understanding Data

Edward561178

Performance_Measurement_Modules..of total quality management

Mir Shah

Botswana's Integration of Data Quality Assurance into Standard Operating Proc...

MEASURE Evaluation

The document summarizes Botswana's collaboration with MEASURE Evaluation to develop national standards for routine monitoring of health data quality. Key deliverables included standard operating procedures, a customized Routine Data Quality Assessment tool, a training curriculum, and workshops. This helped establish a process for data quality monitoring at all levels of the health system using a bottom-up approach. Feedback on the trainings was positive and districts have begun implementing data quality tracking.

Scottish comms network paul njoku - 14 and 15 may 2014

Jane Robson

The document summarizes an evaluation workshop held in Scotland to improve government communication evaluations. It outlines a four-part mandatory evaluation project across UK government departments with the goals of developing performance frameworks, increasing evaluation training, boosting evaluation capabilities, and establishing an evaluation center of excellence. The workshop agenda covered why evaluation is important, barriers to evaluation, and a four-stage evaluation process. Government communication reviews found evaluations were inconsistent and rarely linked policy to communications. The project aims to create a "step change" in evaluation approaches across departments.

DATA MIA

Robyn Cook-Ritchie

This document provides an overview of data management, integrity, and analysis processes for the EOIS-CaMS system. It discusses the importance of collecting and inputting good quality data in a timely manner. It then summarizes the currently available reports in EOIS-CaMS and identifies the most useful reports for measuring performance on the five core measures for 2014-2015: customer satisfaction, service coordination, suitability/learner profile, learner progress, and learners served. For each measure, it outlines where the data comes from and the target values, and provides guidance on ensuring data integrity and using the data for analysis.

Similar to Results of support to district planning, M&E and district-level partner coordination (20)

Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD

Group Two Presentation tr.pptx at mountains of the moon university

M-E systems.ppt

Early Childhood Development Conditional Grant Monitoring System 26 june 2014

Almm monitoring and evaluation tools draft[1]acm sir revised

Monitoring and evaluation for hiv

M & E Fundamentals.

Dr Brian Mutie on basics of Monitoring and Evaluation

The Basics of Monitoring, Evaluation and Supervision of Health Services in Nepal

Final implementation report presentation 14 august 2014

M&e services

IFPRI - Results and Impact Management System (RIMS)

Botswana’s Integration of Health Data Quality Assurance Into Standard Operati...

37851 101218095128-phpapp02

Findings from the REACHOUT Bangladesh team

Mornitoring and Evaluation Plans.Understanding Data

Performance_Measurement_Modules..of total quality management

Botswana's Integration of Data Quality Assurance into Standard Operating Proc...

Scottish comms network paul njoku - 14 and 15 may 2014

DATA MIA

More from Rebekah McKay-Smith

A Voucher scheme in Yemen

Results of support to district planning, M&E and district-level partner coordination

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Results of support to district planning, M&E and district-level partner coordination

Similar to Results of support to district planning, M&E and district-level partner coordination (20)

More from Rebekah McKay-Smith

More from Rebekah McKay-Smith (19)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Results of support to district planning, M&E and district-level partner coordination