2. RASEL APPROACH AND
SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT
IN BASIC SENTENCE
CONSTRUCTION OF GRADE
SIX ARROYO PUPILS
By Sherlyn Bajenting Narsolis
3. ABSTRAC
Tto determine the effectiveness of RASEL
Approach
forty Grade-Six Arroyo Pupils
descriptive-comparative research
design
there was a significant difference
Utilization of strategy is recommended
6. Brewer (2005) – music helps
in sustaining students’
attention
Worth noting that RASEL
Approach is another
strategy that…..
7. Hashim and Rahman (2010) on Use of
Songs to Reinforce the Learning of SVA
- songs as integral part of the lesson
- choice of songs on students’
reaction, successfulness and
effectiveness of the lesson
8. Saricoban and Metin (2000)
- offers change from routine
classroom activities
- develops students’ abilities
9. Fontillas (2013) on Interactive
English Teaching: Effects on
Students’ Performance in Bataan
Peninsula State University
- use of interactive methodology
- use of music and film in institutions
10. PROBLEM STATEMENT:
1)What is the score of the respondents before
the implementation of the RASEL Approach?
2)What is the score of the respondents after
the implementation of RASEL Approach?
11. PROBLEM STATEMENT:
3) Is there a significant difference in the
scores of respondents before and after the
implementation of RASEL Approach?
4) What is the effect size of RASEL Approach
to the improved SVA in basic sentence
construction?
19. RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
Test n sd Mean Descriptive
Interpretation
Pre-
test
40 1.57 8.43 Poor
Table 1. Score before the implementation
of RASEL Approach
20. Test n sd Mean Descriptive
Interpretation
Post
test
40 3.76 13.35 Very Good
Table 2. Score after the implementation of
RASEL Approach
21. Test n df t-value p-value Remarks
Pre-test
and
Posttest
40 39 -9.995 .000 Significant
Table 3. Paired Sample Test on RASEL Approach
22. Findings substantiate the study of:
Hashim and Rahman – unique
characteristics of songs
Brewer – sustaining students’
attention and concentration
23. n t-value Eta2 Remarks
40 -9.995 0.719 Moderate
Effect
Table 4. Effect Size of RASEL Approach
26. REFERENC
E Fontillas, L. R. (2013). Interactive English teaching: effects
on students' performance. Bataan Peninsula State
University, Philippines, Asian Conference on Language
Learning 2013, (p. 253). Osaka, Japan. Retrieved
February 15, 2015, from
http://iafor.org/archives/offprints/acll2013-
offprints/ACLL2013_0131.pdf
Gardner, H. (1999). Multiple intelligences. Retrieved
February 10, 2015, from
http://www.tecweb.org/styles/gardner.html
27. M.A., C. B. (2005). Songs for teaching using music to
promote learning. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from
http://www.songsforteaching.com/teachingtips/classroomo
utcomesofusingmusic.htm
Metin, A. S. (2000).Songs, verse and games for teaching
grammar. Retrieved February 9, 2015, from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Saricoban-Songs.html
28. Nayan, S. (2009, August). A study of subject-verb
agreement: from novice writers. Retrieved February 2015,
from www. ccsenet.org/journal.html.
file:///C:/Users/Sherlyn/Downloads/3036.pdf
Rahman, A. B. (2010). Using songs to reinforce the
learning of subject verb agreement. Retrieved February 8,
2015, from
http://eprints.utm.my/10751/1/USING_SONGS_TO_REIN
FORCE_THE_ LEARNING_OF.pdf