This document summarizes a dissertation on the effect of non-seismic walls on moment resisting frames in buildings. The dissertation explores whether reinforced concrete walls like stairwells and elevator shafts can be neglected in structural analysis. Through modeling and analysis of various building configurations using software, the dissertation found that for buildings up to 12 floors, such walls can be neglected and designed only for gravity loads if certain conditions are met regarding the walls' reinforcement and displacement. The research demonstrated that neglecting these walls results in lower shear and bending stresses on frames compared to considering the walls in the analysis.
Effect of non Seismic Walls
On Moment Resisting Frames in buildings.
Can we neglect reinforce concrete walls like
(stairwells, elevator shafts and so forth)?
*And what are the behavior of these walls during the yielding
point for the steel in work stress stage uncracked section
[Elastic Response Parameters] and after the yielding point in Plastic stage cracked section (Ultimate strength) since
*(Plastic Hinges) will occur in the Frames during plastic
stage And the frames shall peer all the entire seismic loads
And what are these Condition and arrangements to keep
the section walls in safety during plastic stage
so they can carry just the ordinary(D+L) axial loads.
Dose reinforcement for axial ordinary loads enough for these walls from collapsing?
All these answers you will get it when you look at the Dissertation
Special shear walls + ordinary shear walls ACI - 318 - جدران القص الخاصة - P...Dr.Youssef Hammida
Specifications of Special
shear walls
• 1- to form a plastic hinge and wall work in the plastic area
distracting section of the quake, where increasing energy transfer and nonlinear distortions
With firmness despite rising resistance section loads base shear forces
Detailed plastically shaped at the bottom of the wall up the foundation base point
Where the forces of bending moment and shear baseband is greatest
• 2 - have a long high hinge plastically area along the height of the wall
And almost equal to the rise in the wall / 6, H / 6 or along the plan length L
• 3 - the region where the plastic hinge cracked consider (cracked section) and the reduction of inertia (Ig) = (0.35 - 0.5) according to the local code
But after the hinge ductile shear wall treats ordinary wall
area (un cracked section) = (0.7 - 0.8)
• 4 - neglecting the resistance of concrete to resist shear forces
and reinforcing longitudinal and horizontal
In the area and the plastic hinge along only
presentation gives data on "how Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’ was done" and how mathematics and finite elemental analysis are useful for as a part of analysis of stresses strain,wind loading..ect.
In last decades steel structures has played an impo rtant role in construction industry. Providing strength,stability and ductility are major purpose s of seismic design. It is necessary to design a structure to perform well under seismic loads. Stee l braced frame is one of the structural systems used to resist earthquake loads in structures. Stee l bracing is economical,easy to erect,occupies less space and has flexibility to design for meetin g the required strength and stiffness. Bracing can be used as retrofit as well. There are various type s of steel bracings such as Diagonal,X,K,V,inverted V type or chevron and global type concentr ic bracings. In the present study,it was shown that modeling of the G+4 steel bare frame with vari ous bracings (X,V,inverted V,and Knee bracing) by computer software SAP2000 and pushover analysis results are obtained. Comparison between the seismic parameters such as base shear,roof displacement,time period,storey drift,performance point for steel bare frame with differe nt bracing patterns are studied. It is found that the X type of steel bracings significantly contribu tes to the structural stiffness and reduces the maximum interstate drift of steel building than oth er bracing systems.
Effect of non Seismic Walls
On Moment Resisting Frames in buildings.
Can we neglect reinforce concrete walls like
(stairwells, elevator shafts and so forth)?
*And what are the behavior of these walls during the yielding
point for the steel in work stress stage uncracked section
[Elastic Response Parameters] and after the yielding point in Plastic stage cracked section (Ultimate strength) since
*(Plastic Hinges) will occur in the Frames during plastic
stage And the frames shall peer all the entire seismic loads
And what are these Condition and arrangements to keep
the section walls in safety during plastic stage
so they can carry just the ordinary(D+L) axial loads.
Dose reinforcement for axial ordinary loads enough for these walls from collapsing?
All these answers you will get it when you look at the Dissertation
Special shear walls + ordinary shear walls ACI - 318 - جدران القص الخاصة - P...Dr.Youssef Hammida
Specifications of Special
shear walls
• 1- to form a plastic hinge and wall work in the plastic area
distracting section of the quake, where increasing energy transfer and nonlinear distortions
With firmness despite rising resistance section loads base shear forces
Detailed plastically shaped at the bottom of the wall up the foundation base point
Where the forces of bending moment and shear baseband is greatest
• 2 - have a long high hinge plastically area along the height of the wall
And almost equal to the rise in the wall / 6, H / 6 or along the plan length L
• 3 - the region where the plastic hinge cracked consider (cracked section) and the reduction of inertia (Ig) = (0.35 - 0.5) according to the local code
But after the hinge ductile shear wall treats ordinary wall
area (un cracked section) = (0.7 - 0.8)
• 4 - neglecting the resistance of concrete to resist shear forces
and reinforcing longitudinal and horizontal
In the area and the plastic hinge along only
presentation gives data on "how Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’ was done" and how mathematics and finite elemental analysis are useful for as a part of analysis of stresses strain,wind loading..ect.
In last decades steel structures has played an impo rtant role in construction industry. Providing strength,stability and ductility are major purpose s of seismic design. It is necessary to design a structure to perform well under seismic loads. Stee l braced frame is one of the structural systems used to resist earthquake loads in structures. Stee l bracing is economical,easy to erect,occupies less space and has flexibility to design for meetin g the required strength and stiffness. Bracing can be used as retrofit as well. There are various type s of steel bracings such as Diagonal,X,K,V,inverted V type or chevron and global type concentr ic bracings. In the present study,it was shown that modeling of the G+4 steel bare frame with vari ous bracings (X,V,inverted V,and Knee bracing) by computer software SAP2000 and pushover analysis results are obtained. Comparison between the seismic parameters such as base shear,roof displacement,time period,storey drift,performance point for steel bare frame with differe nt bracing patterns are studied. It is found that the X type of steel bracings significantly contribu tes to the structural stiffness and reduces the maximum interstate drift of steel building than oth er bracing systems.
Reinforced concrete special moment frames • are used as part of seismic force-resisting systems in buildings that are designed to resist earthquakes. • Beams, columns, and beam-column joints in moment frames are prop... more abstract
STRUCTURAL COST COMPARISON OF LOW RISE BUILDING HAVING MOMENT RESISTING FRAME...IAEME Publication
In Bhuj earthquake 2001, there were collapses of many low rise buildings. After a
very severe seismic shaking, it may be far cheaper to repair, or even rebuild the
damaged structure, than to build a no damaged structure in the first place. With the
help of shear walls the structure can be made which will not collapse in earthquake. It
is general perception in minds of people that shear walls are economical for high rise
buildings. Therefore it is necessary to find out cost efficiency of low rise buildings
with shear walls
Coupling Beams Design in High-Rise Core-Wall Structures
Shear wall structures are most important lateral-force-resisting-systems that have been shown to be
very efficient in resisting seismic loads. But previous earthquake damages showed that the coupling
beams were easily damaged in the earthquake and it was often used as an energy dissipation part in structures.
Study of Eccentrically Braced Outrigger Frame under Seismic ExitationIJTET Journal
Outrigger braced structures has efficient structural form consist of a central core, comprising braced frames with
horizontal cantilever ”outrigger” trusses or girders connecting the core to the outer column. When the structure is loaded
horizontally, vertical plane rotation of the core is restrained by the outriggers through tension in windward column and
compression in leeward column. The effective structural depth of the building is greatly increased, thus augmenting the lateral
stiffness of the building and reducing the lateral deflections and moments in core. In effect, the outriggers join the columns to the
core to make the structure behave as a partly composite cantilever. By providing eccentrically braced system in outrigger frame by
varying the size of links and analyzing it. Push over analysis is carried out by varying the link size using computer programs, Sap
2007 to understand their seismic performance. The ductile behavior of eccentrically braced frame is highly desirable for structures
subjected to strong ground motion. Maximum stiffness, strength, ductility and energy dissipation capacity are provided by
eccentrically braced frame. Studies were conducted on the use of outrigger frame for the high steel building subjected to
earthquake load. Braces are designed not to buckle, regardless of the severity of lateral loading on the frame. Thus eccentrically
braced frame ensures safety against collapse.
السقوف الشبكية الفراغية Space & diagrid frames- DesignDr.youssef hamida
: - Space frame
هو هيكل إنشائي صلب خفيف الوزن مصنوع من الدعامات المتشابكة في نمط هندسي مثلث شبيه بالجمالون. يمكن إستخدام إطارات الفضاء لتمتد لمساحات واسعة مع استخدام عدد قليل من الدعامات الداخلية. في الجمالون مثلا، يعتبر إطار الفضاء قوي بسبب الصلابة الموجود في المثلث المشكّل له؛ حيث ينتقل (عزم الانحناء) كما هو بالنسبة للشد Tension) والضغط Compression) للأحمال على طول الهيكل الإنشائي. وهناك عدة تطبيقات عملية لهذا النظام الإنشائي
In architecture and structural engineering, a space frame or space structure is a truss-like, lightweight rigid structure constructed from interlocking struts in a geometric pattern. Space frames can be used to span large areas with few interior supports. Like the truss, a space frame is strong because of the inherent rigidity of the triangle; flexing loads (bending moments) are transmitted as tension and compression loads along the length of each strut.
Coupling Beams
in High-Rise Core-Wall Structures
Shear wall structures are most important lateral-force-resisting-systems that have been shown to be
very efficient in resisting seismic loads. But previous earthquake damages showed that the coupling
beams were easily damaged in the earthquake and it was often used as an energy dissipation part in structures.
Design elevated tanks Dynamic Analysis
Response spectrum Spring mass model
Examples solved according to
Egyptian - European -Code
Models High tanks – floor-design
Roofed - exposed - concrete - metal
1. High-tank reinforced concrete roofed propped on a framework (4) columns
2. - High-roofed reinforced concrete tank propped on a framework (6) columns
3 - High-roofed reinforced concrete tank propped on Core Reinforced Concrete
4 - Ground-roofed metal circular tank propped directly on the soil
5 - Ground tank Exposed reinforced concrete circular propped directly on the soil
6. - Ground tank Exposed reinforced concrete rectangular propped directly on the soil
Design and Structural Excel sheet programs
Topics and articles in Structural Engineering
In design - and public safety local and international
engineering codes And maintain the integrity of
building and the lives of vacancies
Abstract --- Graspless manipulation is easily interfered by external disturbances because the manipulated object is not completely held by a robot hand and supported by an environment such as a floor. Thus it is important to ensure the manipulation
is executed robustly against some disturbances. In our works, we have proposed a rigid-body-based analysis of indeterminate contact forces for quasi-static graspless manipulation, and also joint torque optimization for robotic hands. The joint torques
of the robot is determined in consideration of some robustness of manipulation against disturbances, which include changes or estimation errors of friction. In the analysis of contact forces in quasi-statics, we consider a kinematic constraint on static friction to exclude infeasible sets of frictional force, with considering treatment of kinetic friction. We also propose new objective functions for computing optimal joint torques in both static and quasi-static graspless manipulation. Some numerical samples of both applications are shown to verify our proposed methods.
Reinforced concrete special moment frames • are used as part of seismic force-resisting systems in buildings that are designed to resist earthquakes. • Beams, columns, and beam-column joints in moment frames are prop... more abstract
STRUCTURAL COST COMPARISON OF LOW RISE BUILDING HAVING MOMENT RESISTING FRAME...IAEME Publication
In Bhuj earthquake 2001, there were collapses of many low rise buildings. After a
very severe seismic shaking, it may be far cheaper to repair, or even rebuild the
damaged structure, than to build a no damaged structure in the first place. With the
help of shear walls the structure can be made which will not collapse in earthquake. It
is general perception in minds of people that shear walls are economical for high rise
buildings. Therefore it is necessary to find out cost efficiency of low rise buildings
with shear walls
Coupling Beams Design in High-Rise Core-Wall Structures
Shear wall structures are most important lateral-force-resisting-systems that have been shown to be
very efficient in resisting seismic loads. But previous earthquake damages showed that the coupling
beams were easily damaged in the earthquake and it was often used as an energy dissipation part in structures.
Study of Eccentrically Braced Outrigger Frame under Seismic ExitationIJTET Journal
Outrigger braced structures has efficient structural form consist of a central core, comprising braced frames with
horizontal cantilever ”outrigger” trusses or girders connecting the core to the outer column. When the structure is loaded
horizontally, vertical plane rotation of the core is restrained by the outriggers through tension in windward column and
compression in leeward column. The effective structural depth of the building is greatly increased, thus augmenting the lateral
stiffness of the building and reducing the lateral deflections and moments in core. In effect, the outriggers join the columns to the
core to make the structure behave as a partly composite cantilever. By providing eccentrically braced system in outrigger frame by
varying the size of links and analyzing it. Push over analysis is carried out by varying the link size using computer programs, Sap
2007 to understand their seismic performance. The ductile behavior of eccentrically braced frame is highly desirable for structures
subjected to strong ground motion. Maximum stiffness, strength, ductility and energy dissipation capacity are provided by
eccentrically braced frame. Studies were conducted on the use of outrigger frame for the high steel building subjected to
earthquake load. Braces are designed not to buckle, regardless of the severity of lateral loading on the frame. Thus eccentrically
braced frame ensures safety against collapse.
السقوف الشبكية الفراغية Space & diagrid frames- DesignDr.youssef hamida
: - Space frame
هو هيكل إنشائي صلب خفيف الوزن مصنوع من الدعامات المتشابكة في نمط هندسي مثلث شبيه بالجمالون. يمكن إستخدام إطارات الفضاء لتمتد لمساحات واسعة مع استخدام عدد قليل من الدعامات الداخلية. في الجمالون مثلا، يعتبر إطار الفضاء قوي بسبب الصلابة الموجود في المثلث المشكّل له؛ حيث ينتقل (عزم الانحناء) كما هو بالنسبة للشد Tension) والضغط Compression) للأحمال على طول الهيكل الإنشائي. وهناك عدة تطبيقات عملية لهذا النظام الإنشائي
In architecture and structural engineering, a space frame or space structure is a truss-like, lightweight rigid structure constructed from interlocking struts in a geometric pattern. Space frames can be used to span large areas with few interior supports. Like the truss, a space frame is strong because of the inherent rigidity of the triangle; flexing loads (bending moments) are transmitted as tension and compression loads along the length of each strut.
Coupling Beams
in High-Rise Core-Wall Structures
Shear wall structures are most important lateral-force-resisting-systems that have been shown to be
very efficient in resisting seismic loads. But previous earthquake damages showed that the coupling
beams were easily damaged in the earthquake and it was often used as an energy dissipation part in structures.
Design elevated tanks Dynamic Analysis
Response spectrum Spring mass model
Examples solved according to
Egyptian - European -Code
Models High tanks – floor-design
Roofed - exposed - concrete - metal
1. High-tank reinforced concrete roofed propped on a framework (4) columns
2. - High-roofed reinforced concrete tank propped on a framework (6) columns
3 - High-roofed reinforced concrete tank propped on Core Reinforced Concrete
4 - Ground-roofed metal circular tank propped directly on the soil
5 - Ground tank Exposed reinforced concrete circular propped directly on the soil
6. - Ground tank Exposed reinforced concrete rectangular propped directly on the soil
Design and Structural Excel sheet programs
Topics and articles in Structural Engineering
In design - and public safety local and international
engineering codes And maintain the integrity of
building and the lives of vacancies
Abstract --- Graspless manipulation is easily interfered by external disturbances because the manipulated object is not completely held by a robot hand and supported by an environment such as a floor. Thus it is important to ensure the manipulation
is executed robustly against some disturbances. In our works, we have proposed a rigid-body-based analysis of indeterminate contact forces for quasi-static graspless manipulation, and also joint torque optimization for robotic hands. The joint torques
of the robot is determined in consideration of some robustness of manipulation against disturbances, which include changes or estimation errors of friction. In the analysis of contact forces in quasi-statics, we consider a kinematic constraint on static friction to exclude infeasible sets of frictional force, with considering treatment of kinetic friction. We also propose new objective functions for computing optimal joint torques in both static and quasi-static graspless manipulation. Some numerical samples of both applications are shown to verify our proposed methods.
الفصل الثالث - طريقة إجهادات التشغيل - تصميم المنشآت الخرسانية المسلحةAhmed Gamal Abdel Gawad
حل أمثلة الفصل الثالث :
http://www.mediafire.com/?7a15r4o7dxa3u4t
المحاضرة السادسة : تحليل المقاطع بطريقة إجهادات التشغيل
http://youtu.be/u7kiYBuKVuM
المحاضرة السابعة : تصميم المقاطع بطريقة إجهادات التشغيل
http://youtu.be/EVIJ72Rs3pw
م. أحمد جمال عبد الجواد
الفصل الثاني - المقاطع تحت تأثير عزوم الانحناء - تصميم المنشآت الخرسانية المسلحةAhmed Gamal Abdel Gawad
حل أمثلة الفصل الثاني :
https://www.mediafire.com/?2x3mo52dv9jo6mc
المحاضرة الرابعة : المقاطع تحت تأثير عزوم الإنحناء
http://youtu.be/f5-kOqI3yGQ
المحاضرة الخامسة : تحليل المقاطع قبل التشرخ
http://youtu.be/Y1ikllWCgIU
م. أحمد جمال عبد الجواد
الفصل الثامن - بلاطات القوالب المفرغة - تصميم المنشآت الخرسانية المسلحةAhmed Gamal Abdel Gawad
المحاضرة التاسعة عشر : مقدمة عن بلاطات القوالب المفرغة
https://youtu.be/LRdqk_C0QmM
المحاضرة العشرون : البلاطات المفرغة في الاتجاه الواحد
https://youtu.be/PTnOdpH9pgI
المحاضرة الحادية والعشرون : البلاطات المفرغة في الاتجاهين
https://youtu.be/94BX_1Qi5gY
المحاضرة الثانية والعشرون : الكمرات المدفونة
https://youtu.be/MoajLxlVmKg
المحاضرة الثالثة والعشرون : نمذجة البلاطات المفرغة على الريفيت
https://youtu.be/ess87oGrITk
م. أحمد جمال عبد الجواد
الفصل الأول - مقدمة في الخرسانة المسلحة - تصميم المنشآت الخرسانية المسلحةAhmed Gamal Abdel Gawad
حل أمثلة الفصل الأول :
https://www.mediafire.com/?krb5ubl78obirna
المحاضرة الأولى : مقدمة في الخرسانة المسلحة
http://youtu.be/f5-kOqI3yGQ
المحاضرة الثانية : حديد التسليح
http://youtu.be/Y1ikllWCgIU
المحاضرة الثالثة : أنظمة الوحدات وطرق ومتطلبات التصميم
http://youtu.be/QiDRIFP0Ias
م. أحمد جمال عبد الجواد
المحاضرة السادسة عشر : مقدمة عن البلاطات
https://youtu.be/SfrGZm-4vjA
المحاضرة السابعة عشر : البلاطات المصمتة في الاتجاه الواحد
https://youtu.be/TM7V8n-LcCI
المحاضرة الثامنة عشر : البلاطات المصمتة في الاتجاهين
https://youtu.be/FIMKygfs9bQ
م. أحمد جمال عبد الجواد
• A retaining wall construction method in which walls are constructed with small gaps between adjacent piles. The size of the space is determined by the nature of the soils.
• الخوازيق الساندة بيتم تنفيذها قبل حفر الموقع لأن وظيفتها سند جوانب الحفر
ولايتم الحفر قبل مرور 28 يوم على تنفيذ آخر خازوق ساند
• وبيتم استخدام الخوازيق البنتونيت فى حالة وجود مياة جوفية بمنسوب أعلى ممنسوب الحفرن
• وبيتم تنفيذ الخوازيق البنتونيت أولا ثم بين كل خازوقين بنتونيت يتم تنفيذ خازوق خرسانى بحيث يتداخل بالخوازيق البنتونيت أثناءالتنفي ولا تأثير انشائي له سواء الاملاء وسند التربة
design of piled raft foundations. مشاركة لبشة الأوتاد الخوازيق و التربة في ...Dr.youssef hamida
Of the most important paragraphs of design should study the effect of the Joint Working Group of the falling pile and fall of the soil and find a formula and factor common reaction one between sub grade reaction smart spring worker and worker response pile reaction called spring factor smart In the case of soil subsidence greater than the drop pile will move full load
piles and breaks down to piles or mat and vice versa
In the event of high rises and soil carried acceptable but not enough for the transplant can mat- piles
Regular spacing and share the soil with piles represent the programs work as usual spring network
And the introduction of sub grade reaction as factor in mat alone as well as the added factor reaction pile at each pile
But the application of this method takes the soil report by the impact of joint work between the soil decline and fall of the stake and the coefficient of reaction and give him carrying a load of soil and allowed the pile needs
Also must make sure that the applicable tag allows participation in this way the soil and pile in the joint
Assume springs for soil and piles
getting modulus of sub grad
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
Analysis and comparison of High rise building with lateral load resisting sys...DP NITHIN
Emporis standards define a high rise building as “A multi-storey structure between 35-100 meters tall”. When buildings become taller and taller, the effect of lateral load on the structure comes into existence. The lateral action on the structure is majorly induced by the wind and seismic force.
They needs a lateral load resisting system to maintain the structure stable when lateral loads are applied to them.
The different lateral load resisting systems in the high rise building are
Moment Resisting Frame(MRF), Shear wall system, Bracing system
Evaluation of the Seismic Response Parameters for Infilled Reinforced Concret...IOSRJMCE
RC frames with unreinforced masonry infill walls are a common form of construction all around the world. Often, engineers do not consider masonry infill walls in the design process because the final distribution of these elements may be unknown to them, or because masonry walls are regarded as non-structural elements. Separation between masonry walls and frames is often not provided and, as a consequence, walls and frames interact during strong ground motion. This leads to structural response deviating radically from what is expected in the design. The presence of masonry infills can result in higher stiffness and strength and it is cheap and built with low cost labor. Under lateral load, Masonry walls act as diagonal struts subjected to compression, while reinforced concrete confining members (Frames) act in tension and/or compression, depending on the direction of lateral earthquake forces. The main objective of this research is to develop a realistic matrix for the response modification factors for medium-rise skeletal buildings with masonry infills. In this study, the contribution of the masonry infill walls to the lateral behavior of reinforced concrete buildings was investigated. For this purpose, a five, seven and ten stories buildings are modelled as bare and infilled frames. The parameters investigated were infill ratio, panel aspect ratio, unidirectional eccentricity, bidirectional eccentricities. A Parametric study was developed on the behavior of medium rise infilled frame buildings under lateral loads to investigate the effect of these parameters as well as infill properties on this behavior
STRUCTURAL COST COMPARISON OF LOW RISE BUILDING HAVING MOMENT RESISTING FRAME...IAEME Publication
In Bhuj earthquake 2001, there were collapses of many low rise buildings. After a
very severe seismic shaking, it may be far cheaper to repair, or even rebuild the
damaged structure, than to build a no damaged structure in the first place. With the
help of shear walls the structure can be made which will not collapse in earthquake. It
is general perception in minds of people that shear walls are economical for high rise
buildings. Therefore it is necessary to find out cost efficiency of low rise buildings
with shear walls.
Seismic Response of Structure with Single Coreijtsrd
Shear walls and outriggers have been used so far to resist the seismic waves of earthquake and heavy winds actions. The complete failure of the structures that has occurred in the past due to catastrophic earthquake may be avoided with the use of shear wall in the structure. The study is concerned with the use of shear wall as a single core in structure that will resist the seismic waves of earthquake. In the present study analysis of RCC building has been carried out by changing the locations of shear walls in the building. The seismic analysis performed is linear dynamic response spectrum analysis using the well known analysis and design software ETABS 16.2.0. Seismic performance of the building has been investigated based on parameters such as strorey drift, base shear and storey displacement. Belsare Sumit Bandopanth | Dilip Budhlani "Seismic Response of Structure with Single Core" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-3 , April 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30851.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/civil-engineering/30851/seismic-response-of-structure-with-single-core/belsare-sumit-bandopanth
الأبنية المعلقة بكبلات وشدادات الى اعلى جدران كور بيت الدرج المركزي
اعمدة على محيط الواجاهات فقط
مقاومة الرياح والزلال بجدران كور الخرسانة فقط
cable suspended building-
p- delta analysis - تحليل اعمدة الاطارات لمقاومة عزوم الانتقال الافقي من الزل...Dr.youssef hamida
P- DELTA ANALYSIS
- تحليل اعمدة الاطارات لمقاومة عزوم الانتقال الافقي من الزلازل P - دلتا
نحتاج تحليل p - دلتا عندما الأعمدة لا تشارك في مقاومة الزلازل فقط الجدران القصية تقاوم كامل قوى القص القاعدي والأعمدة تقاوم حمولات شاقولية فقط والعزم الناج من انتقال افقي لاطارات الأعمدة
Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings - طرق تاهيل ...Dr.youssef hamida
Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings - طرق تاهيل وتدعيم الابنية القديمة لمقاومة الزلازل.
تدعيم كل انواع الابنية الخرسانة واالستيل والخشب لمقاومة الزلازل
د. يوسف حميضة-حلب تصميم المباني لمقاومة الزلازل - -محاضرة تأهيل- نقابة المهن...Dr.youssef hamida
Designing Buildings to Resist Earthquakes. Lecture for Qualification of Engineers, Syrian Engineers Syndicate - Aleppo Branch
د. يوسف حميضة - تصميم المباني لمقاومة الزلازل محاضرة تأهيل المهندسين نقابة المهندسين السوريين - فرع حلب
امثلة محلولة وفق الكود السوري
support in bridges - مساند الجسور والكباري- د حميضة.pdfDr.youssef hamida
support in bridges- انواع مساند الجسور والكباري د حميضة
مساند الجسور والكباري د حميضة أنواع المساند هي:
المسند الثابت: يتحمل القوى الأفقية والقوى الرأسية
المسند المنزلق: يتحمل القوى الرأسية فقط، وهذا يعني أنه إذا أثرت عليه قوة أفقية يتم إزاحته أفقياً
ا المسند الموثوق: يتحمل القوى الأفقية والقوى الرأسية والعزوم
الكود الأمريكي وتباعد فواصل التمدد مع او دون حساب جهود الحرارة
ومتى تحتاج الى حساب تأثير الحرارة على الهيكل و التباعدات الأعظمية المسموحة مع حساب الحرارة فقط مع فواصل حرارية او بدون
ACI 2243r-95-Expansion Joint Spacing- Dr hamida.pdf
Welcome to WIPAC Monthly the magazine brought to you by the LinkedIn Group Water Industry Process Automation & Control.
In this month's edition, along with this month's industry news to celebrate the 13 years since the group was created we have articles including
A case study of the used of Advanced Process Control at the Wastewater Treatment works at Lleida in Spain
A look back on an article on smart wastewater networks in order to see how the industry has measured up in the interim around the adoption of Digital Transformation in the Water Industry.
Water scarcity is the lack of fresh water resources to meet the standard water demand. There are two type of water scarcity. One is physical. The other is economic water scarcity.
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
Buying new cosmetic products is difficult. It can even be scary for those who have sensitive skin and are prone to skin trouble. The information needed to alleviate this problem is on the back of each product, but it's thought to interpret those ingredient lists unless you have a background in chemistry.
Instead of buying and hoping for the best, we can use data science to help us predict which products may be good fits for us. It includes various function programs to do the above mentioned tasks.
Data file handling has been effectively used in the program.
The automated cosmetic shop management system should deal with the automation of general workflow and administration process of the shop. The main processes of the system focus on customer's request where the system is able to search the most appropriate products and deliver it to the customers. It should help the employees to quickly identify the list of cosmetic product that have reached the minimum quantity and also keep a track of expired date for each cosmetic product. It should help the employees to find the rack number in which the product is placed.It is also Faster and more efficient way.
Student information management system project report ii.pdfKamal Acharya
Our project explains about the student management. This project mainly explains the various actions related to student details. This project shows some ease in adding, editing and deleting the student details. It also provides a less time consuming process for viewing, adding, editing and deleting the marks of the students.
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Aryaabh.arya
Presented at NUS: Fuzzing and Software Security Summer School 2024
This keynote talks about the democratization of fuzzing at scale, highlighting the collaboration between open source communities, academia, and industry to advance the field of fuzzing. It delves into the history of fuzzing, the development of scalable fuzzing platforms, and the empowerment of community-driven research. The talk will further discuss recent advancements leveraging AI/ML and offer insights into the future evolution of the fuzzing landscape.
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)MdTanvirMahtab2
This presentation is about the working procedure of Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL). A Govt. owned Company of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation under Ministry of Industries.
About
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface.
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system.
• Compatible with IDM8000 CCR.
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
• Easy in configuration using DIP switches.
Technical Specifications
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
Key Features
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system
• Copatiable with IDM8000 CCR
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
Application
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface.
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system.
• Compatible with IDM8000 CCR.
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
• Easy in configuration using DIP switches.
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdffxintegritypublishin
Advancements in technology unveil a myriad of electrical and electronic breakthroughs geared towards efficiently harnessing limited resources to meet human energy demands. The optimization of hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems plays a pivotal role in utilizing natural resources effectively. This initiative not only benefits humanity but also fosters environmental sustainability. The study investigated the design optimization of these hybrid systems, focusing on understanding solar radiation patterns, identifying geographical influences on solar radiation, formulating a mathematical model for system optimization, and determining the optimal configuration of PV panels and pumped hydro storage. Through a comparative analysis approach and eight weeks of data collection, the study addressed key research questions related to solar radiation patterns and optimal system design. The findings highlighted regions with heightened solar radiation levels, showcasing substantial potential for power generation and emphasizing the system's efficiency. Optimizing system design significantly boosted power generation, promoted renewable energy utilization, and enhanced energy storage capacity. The study underscored the benefits of optimizing hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems for sustainable energy usage. Optimizing the design of solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems as examined across diverse climatic conditions in a developing country, not only enhances power generation but also improves the integration of renewable energy sources and boosts energy storage capacities, particularly beneficial for less economically prosperous regions. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for advancing energy research in economically viable areas. Recommendations included conducting site-specific assessments, utilizing advanced modeling tools, implementing regular maintenance protocols, and enhancing communication among system components.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
2. Dissertation
Effect of non Seismic Walls
On Moment Resisting Frames in buildings.
Can we neglect reinforce concrete walls like
(stairwells, elevator shafts and so forth)?
By:
Dr.Youssef Hamida
Consultant Structural Engineer
Aleppo Engineers Order
Syria - Aleppo
y.hamida@scs-net.org
Web: www.dr-hamida.com
2
3. Seminar Abstract – Non Seismic Walls
The performance of the Dual systems (frames and walls) in re-
sisting earthquakes.
And the efficiency of neglecting the walls (Reinforce con-
crete, masonry, partition, fill) and depending Completely on
the frames in resisting the seismic loads.
and what are the Effecting factors which will occur from
neglecting these walls ?
like (Rigidity – Eccentricity – Torsion – Period - Base Shear)
On the behave of the Moment resisting Frames
Can we neglect reinforce concrete walls like stairwells, ele-
vator shafts and so forth?
*And what are the behavior of these walls during the yielding
point for the steel in work stress stage uncracked section
[Elastic Response Parameters] and after the yielding point in
Plastic stage cracked section (Ultimate strength) since
*(Plastic Hinges) will occur in the Frames during plastic
stage And the frames shall peer all the entire seismic loads
And what are these Condition and arrangements to keep
the section walls in safety during plastic stage
so they can carry just the ordinary(D+L) axial loads.
Dose reinforcement for axial ordinary loads enough for these
walls from collapsing?
All these answers you will get it when you look at the Dis-
sertation
3
4. 2 Dissertation text
-Introductory
As it is well known to most of structural engineers who are
familiar with the types of structural systems for resisting
wind and seismic loads, they are called
Shear systems-such as:
1-Frames:
This is a frame system of rigid beams subjected to lateral
loads where the developed moments in the middle of the columns
are not existent And the shear forces will be distributed pro-
portionally with the moment of inertia of the columns and the
lateral displacements will be proportional to these forces
2-Shear walls:
These systems resist the lateral loads with the shear walls
whether these walls are separated or connected by beams.
The distribution of shear forces is proportional to the moment
of inertia of the cross sections of the walls; the displace-
ments in each floor or level are the result of the Flexural
deformations in the walls.
3-Dual systems
These systems are the result of combining the two latter
systems to resist the lateral load, in these systems the shape
of the deformations will differ from those in frames and walls
systems, where effecting interacted forces advantages of this
combination is that the frames support the walls at the top and
control their displacement. Besides, the walls support the frames
at the bottom and decrease their displacement In other words, the
shear force of the frames is bigger at the top than it is at the
bottom and it goes the other way round for the
walls occur and change the shape of shear and moment diagrams.
4
5. -It has been mentioned in the international and local codes
that in case we have regular frames of beams and columns along
with shear walls to resist
the lateral loads, the resistance of these members (the
frames) to the lateral
loads can be neglected, and it will be considered in the
calculations only to
resist the vertical loads, but we should conform to the
codes conditions
relating to the minimum reinforcement
and the allowed displacement of these beams and columns
-We rarely find shear systems as complete shear walls
without regular frames
(beams and columns), or absolute frames without service
walls or elevator walls
5
6. the purpose of our research
- And the purpose of our research is to find out if we can
neglect the presence of walls (concrete or masonry) if they
are together with the frame system,where the frame system re-
sists all the lateral shear forces, and the walls will be con-
sidered just to bear the vertical load, and what are the pro-
visions for these walls and their effect on the frames load.
-We will find the proper answer throughout our research and
experiments in this subject, and you can find the summary
of the research in the results and recommendations page
The reasons and the cause for choosing this research
and its importance, and whether it is done to fulfill an
engineering need or to solve an engineering problem that
helps in developing the engineering work.
3-Research topic Demonstration
3.1 The Dual system is the one that both shear walls and
frames participate in resisting the lateral loads resulting
from earthquakes or wind or storms, possibility to develop
plastic hinges
and the portion of the forces resisted by each one depends on
its rigidity modulus of elasticity and its ductility, and the
in its parts Knowing that the frame is a group of beams and
columns connected with each other by rigid joints that can re-
sist shear and moments, and the shear wall is considered as a
cantilever free on the top and fixed in the bottom.
55
7. 3.2 The structural resisting system might be only shear walls
for resisting the lateral load and we can neglect the regular
frames.
3.3 The structural resisting system might be only frames
for resisting the lateral load and it is called Moment
Resisting Frames In the case of shear walls with the moment
resisting frames can we neglect the effect of these walls, and
calculate the frames to resist the whole base shear
this is the subject of our research; the existence of some
shear walls with moment resisting frames, could it be
neglected and not taken into consideration for resisting the
lateral loads, which means to calculate them only as gravity
loads resisting members, and what are structural effects and
changes resulting from that.
6
8. 4.Purpose and benefit of the research
-Some complains and questions had come to the Engineering
Union-Civil Engineering department, about invalidating some
domestic and industrial buildings licenses where some
structural notes are present, and when there is a
contradiction between the structural requirements for the
buildings and the building manners or systems of the city mu-
nicipality where.
4.1 Elevator and service walls must be of reinforced
concrete, and that is to comply with the mechanical study,
fire resistance, and more other reasons.
4.2 Also to conform to the structural provisions of the city
municipality, the stair house walls should be of
reinforced concrete instead of using masonry walls,and be-
cause of the door openings and piers are in small
dimensions, it should be of reinforced concrete to bear the
vertical lo ads.
4.3 Since most of the industrial buildings, stores, shops
and halls or galleries are in the lower floors (base), shear
walls can’t be used to resist the seismic loads, so it is pre-
ferred to use moment resisting frames.
8
9. 4.4 Repeating the structural study with taking into
consideration the seismic study, and including these walls in
the study will cause increment in the
base shear because of decrement in (R); the Elastic Modulus of
the structural system. In addition, the use of computers,
modeling, and advanced programs might be a little hard to pro-
cure in regular or individual offices.
4.5 That’s why we needed to make researches and investigations
about a method or a study of possibility of neglecting the
shear or masonry walls and not considering them as
participants with the frames. Also neglecting the regular
frames and not considering them as participants with the shear
walls, and considering them as gravity loads resisting members
but with other conditions that we will see in the results of
our research.
9
10. 5-The determined basics for making the research:
To define the relationship and the effect of the shear walls
on the function of the
moment resisting frames, and to know if these walls can be
studied only for
resisting the gravity loads not the lateral load
5.1 It was necessary to go back to the theories and hypothe-
sizes of the interactive performance between frames and walls,
and we needed to seek the help of the theory of Professor
(Lain Macleod). The calculations and results have been checked
by the computer de pending on the international program
(ETABS). Due to the enormous number of analysis’s and experi-
ments according to the variety of floors and walls number and
dimensions of cross sections of the columns. We depended on a
local program (STAAD-ALARAB) for calculating the frames and
the shear walls depending on the theory and assumptions of
Professor Macleod relating to the interacted performance be-
tween the frames and the walls. The summary of this theory as
it came in the research symposium of Portland Cement institu-
tion
5.2 The dual system is the one that both frames and shear
walls contribute in resisting the lateral loads, where the
frame is a group of beams and columns connected with each oth-
er by rigid joints, and the frames bend in accordance with
(Shear Mode), whereas the deflection of the shear walls is by
a (Bending Mode) like the cantilever walls
10
11. 5.3 As a result of the difference in deflection properties
between frames and walls, the frames will try to pull the
shear walls in the top of the building while in the bottom,
they will try to push the walls, so the frames will resist the
lateral loads in the upper part of the building, which means
an increase shear walls will resist most of the vertical loads
in the lower part of the building in the dimensions of the
cross section area of the columns in the upper part of the
frame more than what it needs to resist the gravity loads
5.4 So the distribution of the lateral loads in the top de-
pends on the rigidity of the frames where we suppose a spring
support, whose rigidity equals the rigidity of the frames in
the top, and the reaction of this spring is the share of the
frames, and the rest is the share of the walls. So, the walls
are pinned or supported by the frames at the top and fixed at
the bottom and they are resisting the seismic loads
5.5 So we need to find out the value of this reaction at the
top which equals a point load as the share of the frames ac-
cording to the (Macloed Theory).
then the share of the frames will be distributed to each frame
due to its rigidity and position relating to the center of
mass taking into consideration the torsion and shear resulting
from torsion below And that is according to the laws and rela-
tions and factors mentioned
11
12. 6-Terminology:
Ac: cross section area of columns
B: length of the frame
C: width of column
D; depth of the beam
E: Young Modulus
Fg, Fm, Fn, FS: functions depending on the shape of the
seismic load
--------------7
H: total height of the wall
h: height of the column in every floor
Ib: moment of inertia of the beams in the nods or joints
Iw: moment of inertia of the walls
Kw: Shear rigidity of the walls
Kf: rigidity of the frames
--------- 7.1
---------- 7.2
Fs = ----------------- 7.3
W = total lateral load
∆ = total displacement in top
∆A = displacement in columns from axial load
∆B = displacement from moment
12
13. ---------------------------- 7.4
displacement of walls ------ 7.5
∆f = displacement of Columns --- 7.6
------ rigidity of the frames
----- rigidity of the walls
--------------- 7.7
W =-------- total shear forces
P =-------- share of Frames
P1= W-P ---share of the Walls
13
14. 7-Researches and experiments:
- The research has been done and the data has been changed to
follow the Second Static Method for calculating the Base Shear
according to the Syrian Code and The American Code: (Uniform
Building Code, UBC) according to the law
= total base shear
7.1 The local program (STAAD-ALARAB) and ETABS have been
adopted to check and calculate the internal forces resulting
from neglecting the shear walls.
7.2 Thirty five typical space and plane cases have been
chosen. In every case, the constants and dimensions are
changed to obtain the maximum stresses and forces and that is
according to the tables, calculations and the results attached
in the end of the research.
7.3 For the number of the floors, we studied from one
floor cases till twelve floor cases.
Three cases have been chosen to get maximum
torsion and its effect on the frame, and that is by
the types of the walls and their positioning with respect to
the center of mass
7.4 A case of one wall with frames different in rigidity
has been studied, with different floors for different cases
with eccentricities:
e = l / 2 e = l / 4 e = 0
14
15. 7.5 Also the procedures are repeated for the case of two
walls for different number of floors and different examples
7.6 Also the procedures are repeated for the case of three
walls for different
number of floors, different types and rigidities
of frames and different eccentricities
7.7 Also in the research, a case of only frames without
shear walls has been studied, then we started to insert one
shear wall, then we increased the number of walls to two then
to three. Also for finding the eccentricity and increasing it
to the maximum value predicted Through the research results
and the attached tables, some important observations can be
noted, and corrections to some wrong concepts can be done for
the colleagues of engineers about the relation between the
frames and walls.
7.8 The most significant observation and the correction to
the wrong belief is that increasing the number of shear walls
and duplicating its area doesn’t duplicate the share of the
walls, but it stays almost the same as there is only one shear
wall, the increase is almost insignificant (about 15%) and it
comes from the increase of base shear resulting from the in-
crease in rigidity of the walls and the decrease of the dynam-
ic period, which means that the frames takes its share from
the base shear in the top then the rest is distributed (in the
bottom on the existed walls (one or two or three….etc.) And
that is what we observed in the research results, that is ex-
isting of a number of walls and then neglecting them is better
and gives less shear and bending stresses than the case of one
wall which is considered to be neglected
15
16. 7.9 We found out through the results that the frame’s shear
if there is no walls (the Moment resisting frames case) is
bigger than what it is in the case of frames and neglected
walls, because the torsion shear which is caused by
theeccentricity of the neglected walls, and which is added to
the eperipheral frames’ shear is smaller than the shear that
the walls take from the peripheral frame with the maximum tor-
sion.
7.10 also noticed the increase of the base shear when
there are walls rather than the case of no walls (only frames)
and that is because of the decrease of the dynamic period for
the increase in the rigidity of the Dual system and
thedecrease of the factor(R)in the denominator of the base
shear wall
7.11 In the attached drawing of the (interactive-mutual)
performance, we noticed that in the case of only two shear
walls without a frame, the base shear is distributed equally
in the top and bottom in the walls. And if there is one frame
with those two walls, we see that the share of the walls is
maximum in the bottom, and the share of the frame is zero in
the top and the bottom but maximum at the height (0.8 H), and
that is the hypothesis of Prof. Macloed, which is to put a
constant point load equals to the maximum shear which occurs
at the height (0.8-0.95) of the total height
7.12 Referring back to the results table of the program STAAD-
ALARAB and ETABS for the internal forces or stresses and Rein-
forcement
16
17. 7.13 we notice that it is taken into consideration:
-the dynamic period, the static period, ductility factor (Rw),
accidental eccentricity of walls positioning, ratio of frames
and walls shares, modifying the value of ductility factor (Rw)
according to that ratio, also calculation of the base consid-
ering the maximum case. shear V for every case and
7.14 we noticed from the table that the maximum share of
the frames in case of no walls (Moment resisting frames) is
larger than the case of frames with walls, for example:
8-Comparison and results:
Research example No#5:
Floor number: 7
The columns: 40 X 60
The walls: L=3,00 m
V= 61 t without walls
V= 44.46 t in case of one wall with maximum eccentricity
61 > 44.46 accepted
8.1 Also we notice from the results of ETABS:
That the shear and flexural stresses are maximum for one
shear wall, also we noticed that the minimum reinforcement for
shear and bending is adequate, so these walls can be neglected
and designed only for the gravity loads, if the number of
floors is less or equal to twelve floors.
17
18. 8.2 We noticed when the number of the floors is more than
twelve, and the minimum reinforcement is not adequate here, we
differentiate two cases:
8.2-1 When the flexural reinforcement is not adequate, the
walls are safe, because when the walls enters the plastic
situation, the frames will intervene and take the loads from
these walls and the walls will crack but not collapse, or it
will lose its rigidity and not resist any lateral loads
8.2-2 When the shear reinforcement is not adequate these
walls will collapse by shear, and its breaking will be brittle
so it should it should be calculated, or we should neglect its
resistance to the vertical loads by putting beams over them.,
9-Results and recommendations
9.1 It is possible to neglect the walls and do not
consider them as participants with the moment resisting fames
in resisting the lateral loads and to consider that all the
lateral loads as base shear or wind loads are going to be re-
sisted only by the frames according to
9.2 The moment resisting frames is not affected by neglecting
the walls when the walls do not take part with the frames in
resisting the loads, on the contrary, the safety factor for
the frames becomes bigger and the shear resisted by the frames
is less than what it was when the frames were alone
9.3 When the number of the building’s floor is equal or less
than 12 floors, (n<12), the walls can be neglected provided
that they are qualified to bear the only vertical loads, and
the minimum reinforcement is adequate for flexural and shear
18
19. 9.4 When the number of the building’s floor is more than
12 floors, (n>12), it is possible to neglect the participation
of the walls with the frames, provided that we should consider
finding alternative members to the walls for resisting the
vertical loads like beams or the frames itself, so when we put
beams on top of the walls or any other structural members to
transfer the vertical loads from these walls to the beams and
columns It is adequate to use the minimum reinforcement for
flexure al and shear stresses.
9.5 from(Tab-4,Tab-5)we find the ductility factor(R) decrease
to (7) instead of (8) and the base shear(v)increase (18%)
Because of affect walls stiffness.
10 conclusion
10-1 in ordinary building less than 12 story n<12 the service
walls like {stairwells, elevator shafts and so forth} can be
neglected to share frames in resisting seismic
10-2 the total base shear will take by frames after degreasing
The factor of ductility ,one degree or increasing the base
shear on frames 18%
10-3 seismic minimum reinforcement ably in both direction
As the code says.
19
20. REFERENCES:
- The Arabic Syrian Code and its appendixes in resisting the seismic loads.
- The American codes: UBC-ACI
- Shear wall-frame interaction
by :I.A. Macloed
-Seismic design
by :D.T. Derecho
-STAAD-ALARAB, walls and frames
-by : D r . Youssef Hamida
-Interaction of shear walls and frames
By: Khan and Sbarounis
-Concrete shear walls combined with rigid frames
By: Cardan Bernard
-Multistory frames and interconnected shear walls
American concrete institute
By Firschman prabhu
-Design of Multistory reinforced concrete building for earthquake motions
-Shear wall design philosophy
By : Portland Cement Association
20
21. ACI committee symposium paper by Thomas Paulay
-An inelastic approach to seismic design
by: American Society of Civil Engineering
-Response of multistory structures to lateral forces
by: Cardenas, Alex
-Symposiums and lectures of Engineers Union, Aleppo Branch
Resisting the seismic loads by walls and frames.
By: D r . Youssef Hamida
-Symposiums and lectures of Engineers Union, Damascus Branch
Analyzing and designing of buildings for Earthquakes
By: D r Karameh Baddorah - Dr. Zein-Aldeen -Dr. Alhessen
Structures dynamics and seismic engineering
By: D r Samara
21
31. staad alarab-result
dynami
c
Stati
c design
Stories
period
perio
d
period
T= Wall from
5 DT ST
1.4*Ts<
DT
ductilit
y
mass
center
Eccentrici
ty
Base
Shear
Frame
s
Columns
Name DT sT T wR a e V
%
Share
60X60 Frames
)x(
50.6 0.63 0.65 8 0 0 58.62
100%
wall 60.71
20x300
cm Frames
)y(
0.61 0.63 0.61 7 0 0 69.4
100%
69.4
Frames
0.5 0.42 0.5 7.5 0 0 80.8
50%
one wall 40.4
+Frames
e 0.47 0.42 0.47 7.5 7.5 0.71 85.87
50%
One wall 42.87
Frames
0.48 0.42 0.48 7 0 0 90.18
45%
Tow
walls
41.03
Frames
+e
0.45 0.42 0.45 7 7.5 1.04 96.7
45%
Tow
walls
44
Story
dynami
c
Stati
c design Wall from
5
period
perio
d
period
T=
ductilit
y
mass
center
Eccentrici
ty
Base
Shear
Frame
s
Columns
Name DT ST
1.4*Ts<
DT wR a e V
%
Share
40X60 Frames
(x)
0.67 0.63 0.67 8 55.15
100%
wall 55.15
20x300
cm Frames
(y)
0.65 0.63 0.65 7 67 100%
67
Frames +
0.53 0.42 0.53 7 0 0 81.88
49%
one wall 0.284
Frames
+e 0.5 0.42 0.5 7 7.5 0.79 87.26 49%
One wall 42.93
Frames+
0.51 0.42 0.51 7 0 0 85.65
44%
Tow
walls 38.11
Frames
+e
0.47 0.42 0.47 7 7.5 1.15 91.95
44%
Tow
walls 40.92
4–Table
staad alarab-result
3311
32. Story
dynami
c
Stati
c design Wall from
5 period
perio
d
period
T=
ductilit
y
mass
center
Eccentrici
ty
Base
Shear
Frame
s
Columns
Name DT ST
1.4*Ts<
DT wR a e V
%
Share
30X80 Frames
(x)
0.71 0.63 0.63 8 0 0 53.37
100%
wall 53.37
20x300
cm Frames
(y)
0.66 0.63 0.63 7 0 - 65 100%
65.81
Frames
0.55 0.42 0.55 7 0 0 79.11
49%
one wall 38.38
Frames
+e 0.51 0.42 0.51 7 7.5 0.84 84.8 49%
One wall 41.42
Frames
0.52 0.42 0.52 7 0 0 83.3
44%
Tow
walls 36.6
Frames
+e
0.49 0.42 0.49 7 7.5 1.21 89.51
44%
Tow
walls 39.32
Stories
dynami
c
Stati
c design Wall from
7 period
perio
d
period
T=
ductilit
y
mass
center
Eccentrici
ty
Base
Shear
Frame
s
Column
Name DT ST
Ts<1.4*
DT wR a e V
%
Share
40X60 Frames
)x(
0.87 0.81 0.87 8 61
100%
wall 61
20 x 300
cm Frames
(y)
0.82 0.81 0.82 7 74 100%
74
Frames
0.7 0.54 0.7 7.5 0 0 80.62
52%
one wall 41.82
Frames
+e 0.66 0.54 0.66 7.5 7.5 .430 85.7 52%
One wall 44.46
Frames
0.69 0.54 0.69 7 0 0 87.81
49%
Tow
walls 43.1
Frames
+e
0.64 0.54 0.64 7 7.5 0.52 89
41%
Tow
walls 36.56
5–Table
32
33. staad alarab-result
Story
dynami
c
atiSt
c design Wall from
10 period
perio
d
period
T=
ductilit
y
mass
center
Eccentrici
ty
Base
Shear
Frame
s
Columns
Name DT ST
1.4*Ts<
DT wR a e V
%
Share
40X60 Frames
(x)
1.18 1 1.18 8 66.83
100%
wall 66.83
20x300
cm Frames
(y)
1.11 1 11.1 7 78.22 100%
78.22
Frames +
1.02 0.7 0.98 7.5 0 0 82.39
53%
one wall 44
+Frames
e 0.99 0.7 0.98 7.5 7.5 0.21 83.39 53%
One wall 44
Frames
0.92 0.7 0.92 7.5 0 0 88.14
52%
Tow
walls 45.78
Frames
+e
0.87 0.7 0.87 7 7.5 0.33 92.83
52%
Tow
walls 48.2
Story
dynami
c
Stati
c
design Wall from
12 period
perio
d
period
ductilit
y
mass
center
Eccentrici
ty
Base
Shear
Frame
s
Column
Name DT sT T wR a e V
%
Share
60X60 Frames
(x)
1.27 1.2
1.23 8
80.2
100%
wall 80.2
20x300
cm Frames
(y)
1.23 1.2 1.23 7 84.85 100%
84.85
Frames+
1.04 0.81 1.04 7.5 0 0 93.81
54%
one wall 50.6
+Frames
e 0.98 0.81 0.98 7.5 7.5 0.15 99.6 0.54%
One wall 53.4
Frames +
1.02 0.81 1.02 7.5 0 0 95.3
53%
Tow
walls 50.33
Frames
+e
0.96 0.81 0.96 7.5 7.5 0.24 101.4
53%
Tow
walls 53.6
6–Table
33
34. staad alarab-result
walls frames-Etabs
Name
Max
Shear
Max
Bending
arShe
stress
Shear
reinf Tension steel Ratio
Research ton/m
ton.m tu kg/cm2
All
Stories
Typical
Story
Base
Story
A Frames + 38.28 202
6.38
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio
0.008
Story one wall
5
Frames
+e 27 159 4.50
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio
0.008
Column One wall
60X60 Frames + 30 175
5.00
Mini
Ratio
Mini Ratio
0.008
wall Tow walls
20x300 cm
Frames
e+ 26.61 132 4.44
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio 0.008
Tow walls
walls frames-Etabs
Name
Max
Shear
Max
Bending
arShe
stress
Shear
rein Tension steel Ratio
Research ton/m
ton.m tu kg/cm2
All
Stories
Typical
Story
Base
Story
B Frames
44 233 7.33
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio 0.008
Story one wall
5
Frames
e+ 26.41 168 4.40 Min
Ratio
Min Ratio 0.008
nColum One wall
40X60 Frames
31.3 187 5.22
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio 0.008
wall s Tow walls
20x300
cm
Frames
e+ 25.3 125 4.22
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio
0.008
Tow walls
walls frames-Etabs
Name
Max
Shear
Max
Bending
shear
stress
arShe
reinf Tension steel Ratio
Research ton/m
ton.m tu kg/cm2
All
Stories
Typical
Story
Base
Story
C Frames 38 212 6.33
Min
Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Story one wall
5
Frames
+e
22
150 3.67
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio
0.008
Column One wall
30X80 Frames
28 176 4.67
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio 0.008
wall Tow walls
20x300
cm
Frames
e+ 25 132 4.17
Min
Ratio
Min Ratio 0.008
Tow walls
7-Table
43
35. staad alarab-result
walls frames-Etabs
Name
Max
Shear
Max
Bending
shear
stress
Shear
reinf Tension steel Ratio
Research
ton/m
ton.m tu kg/cm2 All Stories
Typical
Story
Base
Story
D Frames
44 226 7.33 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Stories one wall
7
Frames
+e 26.5 161 4.42 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
nColum One wall
40X60 Frames
32.5 186 5.42 Min Ratio Min Ratio
0.008
wall
Tow
walls
20x300
cm
Frames
e+ 30 141 5.00 Min Ratio Min Ratio
0.008
Tow
walls
walls frames-Etabs
Name
Max
Shear
Max
Bending
shear
stress
rShea
reinf
Tension
steel Ratio
Research ton/m
ton.m tu kg/cm2 All Stories
Typical
Story
Base
Story
E Frames
44.42 234 7.40 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Story one wall
10
Frames
+e 25.3 159 4.22 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Column llOne wa
40X60 Frames
32.4 191 5.40 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
wall
Tow
walls
20x300
cm
Frames
+e 31 149 5.17 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Tow
walls
walls frames-Etabs
Name
Max
Shear
Max
Bending
Shear
stress
Shear
reinf
ensionT
steel Ratio
Research ton/m
ton.m tu kg/cm2 All Stories
Typical
Story
Base
Story
F Frames
44.5 236 7.42 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Story one wall
12
Frames
+e
31.1
188
5.18 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Column One wall
60X60 Frames
31.2 187 5.20 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
wall
Tow
walls
20x300
cm
Frames
+e
27 153 4.50 Min Ratio Min Ratio 0.008
Tow
walls
8–Table
53
36. Seismic forces
yMax Eccentricit
Tx= 0.609
Ty= 0.609
Calculation
period
Ctx = 0.0731
Cty = 0.0731
Coefficient
Ftx= 0.00 Point Load
Fty = 0.00 Ft =0.07 T* V
X MR = 7.50
Y MR= 7.50
Mass Center
X CR= 7.50
Y CR= 7.50
Rigidity Center
Mtx = 45.53
Mty = 45.53
orsionT
Mx = 0.72 inelastic Drift
My = 0.72 M=0.7 R DS
9-Tab
63
37. Seismic forces
base Shear
Walls Share-Vy
60.71 0.00
Frames %
Frames
Share
100.00 60.71
Ft) Wx hx / s Wi hi-Fx = (V
Base Shear distribution
FX FY
20.24 20.24
16.19 16.19
12.14 12.14
8.09 8.09
4.05 4.05
60.71 60.71
10-Tab
37