Research guidance: R&EE
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•169 views
This document provides guidance for students on researching and writing an educational enquiry project. It outlines the purposes of the research, which are to develop research skills, understand policy and practice contexts, and critically engage with recent research. Key aspects covered include developing a research question, gathering and assessing evidence, arriving at a conclusion, and writing a literature review. The document emphasizes analytical and critical thinking. It provides advice on referencing, ethics, avoiding poor writing habits, and meeting assessment criteria for passing. Deadlines are included for submitting forms and drafts.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Chapter 3 Learning from Other Studies and Reviewing the Literature
The document provides guidance on conducting literature reviews and research ethics. It defines key terms like literature and studies. It outlines important steps like developing a theoretical framework, searching literature sources, taking notes, choosing a review type, and including one's own research. Rules are presented for writing literature reviews and finding information. Different literature review types and their functions are described. Characteristics of cited materials and citation style guides are also discussed. The document concludes with sections on research ethics, plagiarism, and intellectual property protection.
Choosing a research topic
lecture presented by Fe Angela M. Verzosa at PLAI-Southern Tagalog Region Librarians Council Seminar-workshop on the theme, “Research in Librarianship : Capacity Building to Strengthen Research Culture”, held 7 October 2015, El Grande Residencia Hotel and Resort, Brgy. San Carlos, Lipa City
Step3 Literature Review
A literature review surveys academic publications relevant to a particular area of research. Key sources include journal articles, books, conference proceedings, government/corporate reports, theses/dissertations, and some internet sources. Journal articles are useful as they provide up-to-date information, often in a concise format. Refereed/peer-reviewed journals assure readers that the information has been verified by experts. Books offer a starting point but may be less current. The literature review evaluates what is already known in the area, shows relationships between different works, and relates them to the author's own research project, rather than just summarizing others' work. It should answer questions about existing theories, inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and
Choosing a Research Topic
This document provides guidance on identifying a research topic area and focus. It discusses how to determine a good topic by considering personal interests and observations, as well as non-scholarly and scholarly sources. Key steps include identifying an area, focusing on a research problem or question within that area, and drafting a tentative title. The background of a study introduces readers to the research topic and problem to establish the importance and interest of the study. It provides context and discusses what prompted the selection of the research topic.
04 South African Thesis Requirements
The document outlines requirements and expectations for theses at different academic levels in South Africa. For a Master's thesis, it should be 40,000-50,000 words with 100-150 sources, while a mini-thesis is 20,000-25,000 words with 50-75 sources. A PhD dissertation should be 80,000-100,000 words with 250-300 sources. The document also compares thesis levels, providing examples of assessment criteria and viable topics that would be appropriate for each level.
Things to be considered in choosing a topic for research
The research topic must be within the researcher's interests and specialization. It needs to be manageable by having available data and equipment, answerable questions, and testable hypotheses. Finally, the topic should contribute new knowledge and solutions, while being safe and completed timely.
How to Select A Research Topic
The document provides guidance on selecting a research topic, including brainstorming ideas, choosing a manageable topic, defining the topic as a focused research question, and formulating a thesis statement. Some key steps are brainstorming topics based on personal interests or current events, reading background information to identify keywords, focusing the topic by limiting its scope, and researching the topic to answer the research question. The goal is to select a topic that can be thoroughly researched within the assigned parameters.
Recommended
Chapter 3 Learning from Other Studies and Reviewing the Literature
The document provides guidance on conducting literature reviews and research ethics. It defines key terms like literature and studies. It outlines important steps like developing a theoretical framework, searching literature sources, taking notes, choosing a review type, and including one's own research. Rules are presented for writing literature reviews and finding information. Different literature review types and their functions are described. Characteristics of cited materials and citation style guides are also discussed. The document concludes with sections on research ethics, plagiarism, and intellectual property protection.
Choosing a research topic
lecture presented by Fe Angela M. Verzosa at PLAI-Southern Tagalog Region Librarians Council Seminar-workshop on the theme, “Research in Librarianship : Capacity Building to Strengthen Research Culture”, held 7 October 2015, El Grande Residencia Hotel and Resort, Brgy. San Carlos, Lipa City
Step3 Literature Review
A literature review surveys academic publications relevant to a particular area of research. Key sources include journal articles, books, conference proceedings, government/corporate reports, theses/dissertations, and some internet sources. Journal articles are useful as they provide up-to-date information, often in a concise format. Refereed/peer-reviewed journals assure readers that the information has been verified by experts. Books offer a starting point but may be less current. The literature review evaluates what is already known in the area, shows relationships between different works, and relates them to the author's own research project, rather than just summarizing others' work. It should answer questions about existing theories, inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and
Choosing a Research Topic
This document provides guidance on identifying a research topic area and focus. It discusses how to determine a good topic by considering personal interests and observations, as well as non-scholarly and scholarly sources. Key steps include identifying an area, focusing on a research problem or question within that area, and drafting a tentative title. The background of a study introduces readers to the research topic and problem to establish the importance and interest of the study. It provides context and discusses what prompted the selection of the research topic.
04 South African Thesis Requirements
The document outlines requirements and expectations for theses at different academic levels in South Africa. For a Master's thesis, it should be 40,000-50,000 words with 100-150 sources, while a mini-thesis is 20,000-25,000 words with 50-75 sources. A PhD dissertation should be 80,000-100,000 words with 250-300 sources. The document also compares thesis levels, providing examples of assessment criteria and viable topics that would be appropriate for each level.
Things to be considered in choosing a topic for research
The research topic must be within the researcher's interests and specialization. It needs to be manageable by having available data and equipment, answerable questions, and testable hypotheses. Finally, the topic should contribute new knowledge and solutions, while being safe and completed timely.
How to Select A Research Topic
The document provides guidance on selecting a research topic, including brainstorming ideas, choosing a manageable topic, defining the topic as a focused research question, and formulating a thesis statement. Some key steps are brainstorming topics based on personal interests or current events, reading background information to identify keywords, focusing the topic by limiting its scope, and researching the topic to answer the research question. The goal is to select a topic that can be thoroughly researched within the assigned parameters.
Research proposal
What is Research Proposal?
Why do We Need to Write
Research Proposals?
Techniques of Preparing
Research Proposal
How to Write Good
Research Proposals?
Assessment of Research Proposal
How to Defend Research Proposal?
Literature Surveys: A Methodological Approach
This document outlines the steps for conducting a literature survey in a methodological way. It discusses establishing a clear problem description by identifying the problem, research questions, and objectives. It also covers developing a search plan with keywords, potential sources, and an execution process. Finally, it addresses reporting the results by transforming summaries from a text plan into a structured written report with critical interpretation. The overall goal is to provide guidance for systematically planning and conducting a literature survey to answer a research question.
Getting a Head Start with Your Thesis Proposal
This document provides guidance on developing a successful thesis proposal. It discusses analyzing proposal requirements, developing a strong research question, and gaining resources for the proposal project. It emphasizes conceptualizing the project before starting and demonstrating an understanding of discipline-specific research. Key elements of a proposal are identified as the inquiry, background, purpose, and methodology. Tips are provided on finding guidelines, refining the research question, locating it within the field of research, and managing the overall thesis process and proposal writing.
How to Select a Thesis Topic
This document provides guidance on selecting a thesis topic. It discusses choosing a focused and defined topic that is part of a broader problem. A good topic is interesting to the author, feasible within the timeframe and resources, and makes an important contribution by addressing a gap in the existing research. The document outlines the key components of a research proposal and literature review. It also discusses various research designs and ensuring the topic meets standards for examination. Resources for finding a topic include advisors, completed dissertations, and literature in the field. The conclusion emphasizes choosing an interesting, unique, and manageable topic within the author's expertise.
Dissertation Topic; Slide
This document provides guidance on selecting a dissertation topic, including considering personal and external factors. Personal factors to consider include academic interests, topic knowledge, and relevance to future goals. External factors involve topic manageability within time/resource constraints, relevance to the course of study, originality, significance, and suitability for quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods. The document outlines dissertation grading criteria including requirements for distinction, merit, and pass marks. Example dissertation proposals and formatting guidelines are also provided, as well as resources for searching online thesis databases.
26.10.15 literature survey
This document provides guidance for conducting a literature survey as part of a clinical psychology training program. It discusses developing a focused research question using PICO elements, performing a comprehensive literature search across various databases and sources, and systematically documenting the search strategy. It also reviews best practices for evaluating studies and presenting the findings, methods, and conclusions of the literature survey. The goal is to equip students with the skills to identify, review, appraise, and report on a substantial body of empirical evidence relevant to clinical psychology.
Research As Inquiry: Improving Student Engagement in their Research Papers
Presented at the Lilly Conference for Evidence-Based Teaching and Learning in Bethesda, MD, June 2016
Longer research paper by parsu ram karkee
This longer research paper outlines the key differences between longer and shorter research papers. It defines a longer research paper as a more in-depth, systematic, and qualitative academic writing that requires interpreting findings through multiple viewpoints and drawing conclusions. The paper discusses the steps of producing a longer research paper, including choosing a topic, taking organized notes, outlining, drafting, revising, and finalizing. It also covers appropriate formats and styles like APA and advantages like assembling extensive evidence, while noting limitations such as requiring more time and resources.
How to develop a research topic
The document provides guidance on developing a research topic through several steps:
1) Formulate a broad research theme by considering topics of interest and relevance to your field of study. Possible sources of inspiration include literature, current issues, and subject guides.
2) Develop a specific research question by refining your theme using techniques like the "5W method" and organizing concepts visually in diagrams. The research question should allow for elaboration rather than a simple yes/no answer.
3) Further narrow or expand your research topic if needed by taking notes on viewpoints, developments, keywords and evaluating questions based on interest level and scope. The goal is to define a clear topic that can be studied in depth.
literature-review
The document provides a step-by-step guide to conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as surveying scholarly sources on a topic to provide an overview of current knowledge and identify gaps. A 5-step process is outlined: 1) searching relevant literature by defining the topic and keywords, 2) evaluating and selecting sources, 3) identifying themes and gaps, 4) outlining the structure, and 5) writing the literature review. The introduction establishes the purpose, the body analyzes and interprets sources, and the conclusion summarizes key findings and implications.
New EE (2018) guidelines for ibdp sciences
The new extended essay guidelines for 2018 onwards provide guidance for science extended essays. The essay should be an original piece of writing or research of 4000 words that is structured like an academic essay rather than a lab report. It requires a clear introduction, development of two or more viewpoints, and a conclusion. Students must show an in-depth understanding of the topic and how their research question relates to current research. The best science essays demonstrate awareness of issues and place research in the context of current findings. Students must participate in three mandatory reflective sessions and complete a Reflection on Planning and Progress Form to document the process.
Plagiarism & Referencing 2014
This document provides information on referencing and plagiarism. It begins by stating the learning outcomes, which are to understand plagiarism and how to reference work using the Harvard system. It then defines plagiarism and discusses different types of plagiarism. The document also covers how to reference sources in-text and provide full references, highlighting important information to include. Various tools and guides for referencing are also mentioned.
Action Research Lit Review
The document provides guidance on writing a literature review for an action research proposal. It discusses including 10 or more peer-reviewed citations that support the proposed intervention or tools. It also addresses obtaining permission, controlling variables, and having a logical implementation plan. The introduction should define the topic and establish the criteria and organization for analyzing literature. The body groups studies by common factors and summarizes important works. The conclusion evaluates the field and identifies areas for future research.
Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi...
Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi...Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Dentistry
An overview on doing a literature review for a mutli-disciplinary professionals (physicians, engineers, and IT) covering some tips & tricks on organization (using Papers Software for literature files management, MindMapping for Literature Mapping, EndNote for bibliography program). It shows some examples of Citation Maps from Web of Science.Steps in the research process
When writing a research paper, it helps to follow a series of logical and progressive steps. this ensures a better end result!
Choosing research topic[1]
This document discusses various aspects of choosing a research topic, including:
- It is important to choose a topic you are interested in that is complex yet compelling. The topic should set the stage for your future research career.
- Generating ideas from course materials, news, the internet, advisors and literature. Attributes of a good topic include being feasible within the given resources and timeframe, and being worthwhile and providing new insights.
- Narrowing a topic by asking questions to refine the focus. Choosing a researchable question that is fact-based, relevant and action-oriented to provide direction for the research process.
1 literature review workshop-khalid
This document outlines an agenda for a literature review workshop led by Prof. Dr. Khalid Mahmood. The workshop covers topics such as searching for print and online sources, evaluating sources, reading critically, analyzing and synthesizing findings, writing and presenting literature reviews, and avoiding plagiarism. Training methods include lectures, question/answer sessions, sharing experiences, and discussing participants' research projects. The document defines a literature review and explains its purposes such as defining problems, placing studies in context, avoiding duplication, and suggesting hypotheses. It also distinguishes between narrative, systematic and meta-analysis types of literature reviews.
The Literature Review Process
The document provides guidance on conducting an effective literature review. It explains that a literature review (1) develops understanding of a field of study, synthesizes existing work through critical analysis, and must be current; (2) can be part of a larger research study to set context/scope and justify methodology, or a standalone assignment; and (3) is not a simple list of sources but requires making an argument. The review process involves selecting a topic, extensively searching relevant literature, developing arguments addressing what is known and how it relates to research questions, systematically surveying and critiquing the literature to analyze themes and debates, and writing a synthesis that builds on previous work.
Academic essay
Writing an academic essay involves structuring a coherent argument and presenting ideas in a logical order. A typical essay introduces the argument, analyzes evidence, considers counterarguments, and concludes. Different types of information like background context are often located in specialized sections. Successful essays anticipate questions readers may have like "what evidence supports the thesis?", "how does the thesis address counterarguments?", and "why does this matter?". Answering these questions fully helps structure the essay and ensure the argument has significance for readers.
T&l702 sum2014
This document provides an agenda for a class on principles of research. It discusses key aspects of graduate level research including conducting literature reviews. It outlines common errors in literature reviews such as not allowing enough time for search strategies or relying too heavily on secondary sources. The document then discusses how to properly conduct a literature review in the same way as primary research through problem formulation, data collection, evaluation, analysis and presentation. Finally, it discusses managing research through citation management programs and staying current using alerts.
28.02.22 How to structure your research
This document provides guidance on structuring a dissertation or practice as research project. It discusses that research projects typically require sections and plentiful headings, while arts/humanities theses develop an argument through core chapters. Standard sections include an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Arts/humanities theses may combine the introduction, literature review and methodology into one chapter and have topic-focused discussion chapters. The document provides detailed guidance on writing each section, such as summarizing the research in the abstract and citing sources using the Harvard referencing style.
GROUP PROJECTCourse Name and CodeLibrary and Inform.docx
GROUP PROJECT
Course Name and Code
Library and Information Science
Due Date:
Tuesday ( 25 Apr 2017)
Total Marks:
100
Marked by:
Academic Integrity
Plagiarism
The practice of taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own. An example of plagiarism is to use creative works of another, without appropriate acknowledgment of the author or source.
Collusion
Secret or illegal cooperation in order to deceive others. Collusion is the presentation of an assignment as one’s own which is in fact the result in whole or in part of unauthorized collaboration with other person(s). Collusion involves the cooperation of two or more individuals in plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct.
Both plagiarism and collusion constitute cheating. Disciplinary action will be taken against students who engage in plagiarism and collusion.
Student Declaration
No.
Student ID
Student Name
Section
Marks Obtained
1.
2.
3.
I have read and understood the statement of academic integrity written above. I certify that the attached work is entirely my own except where work quoted is duly acknowledged in the text; that I have not worked with another person or persons except where specifically permitted by the teacher, and that this work has not been submitted for assessment by myself or any other person in any other time. I have retained a copy of my work.
LIS101 - LIBRARY INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SEMESTER 162
PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERALL MARK
· The Project carries 45% (100) of course marks
DUE DATE
· 10% from overall mark will be deducted per each day of late submission.
PROJECT FORMAT
· You are required to follow the given format:
· Type written
· Include all Headings
· Edited for typos and grammatical errors
· 1.5 spacing
· Font size - 11
· Lettering – Times New Roman
· Paragraphing – 1.5 spaces
· The Report is at least 5000 words, maximum 6000 words in length
Deliverables
· Each group must submit a hardcopy and softcopy of the project.
Project Description:
Working in groups of 2 to 3 students, find any topic that you are interested in from internet / library on the related information.
Task1:
· Write a research paper on the selected topic.
· Your paper should clearly follow the research process discussed in the class.
Figure 1 Research Process
· Your research should be supported and Cited by at least Six (6) sources.
TASK 2: Each group is to prepare a complete project report based on report outline given below.
REPORT OUTLINE:
CATEGORY
DESCRIPTION
1st PAGE
COVER PAGE ( state clearly your name, ID and section)
2nd PAGE
Report Assessment Rubric (see page 5)
3rd PAGE
Workload distribution (See page 8).
4th PAGE
Table of Content
5th PAGE
Abstract
6th PAGE ONWARDS
CONTENT
You should include:
1. Introduction of your given title and scope.
2. Body of Thesis (Topics that are related to information gathering that have been done based on generated questions).
3. ...
More Related Content
What's hot
Research proposal
What is Research Proposal?
Why do We Need to Write
Research Proposals?
Techniques of Preparing
Research Proposal
How to Write Good
Research Proposals?
Assessment of Research Proposal
How to Defend Research Proposal?
Literature Surveys: A Methodological Approach
This document outlines the steps for conducting a literature survey in a methodological way. It discusses establishing a clear problem description by identifying the problem, research questions, and objectives. It also covers developing a search plan with keywords, potential sources, and an execution process. Finally, it addresses reporting the results by transforming summaries from a text plan into a structured written report with critical interpretation. The overall goal is to provide guidance for systematically planning and conducting a literature survey to answer a research question.
Getting a Head Start with Your Thesis Proposal
This document provides guidance on developing a successful thesis proposal. It discusses analyzing proposal requirements, developing a strong research question, and gaining resources for the proposal project. It emphasizes conceptualizing the project before starting and demonstrating an understanding of discipline-specific research. Key elements of a proposal are identified as the inquiry, background, purpose, and methodology. Tips are provided on finding guidelines, refining the research question, locating it within the field of research, and managing the overall thesis process and proposal writing.
How to Select a Thesis Topic
This document provides guidance on selecting a thesis topic. It discusses choosing a focused and defined topic that is part of a broader problem. A good topic is interesting to the author, feasible within the timeframe and resources, and makes an important contribution by addressing a gap in the existing research. The document outlines the key components of a research proposal and literature review. It also discusses various research designs and ensuring the topic meets standards for examination. Resources for finding a topic include advisors, completed dissertations, and literature in the field. The conclusion emphasizes choosing an interesting, unique, and manageable topic within the author's expertise.
Dissertation Topic; Slide
This document provides guidance on selecting a dissertation topic, including considering personal and external factors. Personal factors to consider include academic interests, topic knowledge, and relevance to future goals. External factors involve topic manageability within time/resource constraints, relevance to the course of study, originality, significance, and suitability for quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods. The document outlines dissertation grading criteria including requirements for distinction, merit, and pass marks. Example dissertation proposals and formatting guidelines are also provided, as well as resources for searching online thesis databases.
26.10.15 literature survey
This document provides guidance for conducting a literature survey as part of a clinical psychology training program. It discusses developing a focused research question using PICO elements, performing a comprehensive literature search across various databases and sources, and systematically documenting the search strategy. It also reviews best practices for evaluating studies and presenting the findings, methods, and conclusions of the literature survey. The goal is to equip students with the skills to identify, review, appraise, and report on a substantial body of empirical evidence relevant to clinical psychology.
Research As Inquiry: Improving Student Engagement in their Research Papers
Presented at the Lilly Conference for Evidence-Based Teaching and Learning in Bethesda, MD, June 2016
Longer research paper by parsu ram karkee
This longer research paper outlines the key differences between longer and shorter research papers. It defines a longer research paper as a more in-depth, systematic, and qualitative academic writing that requires interpreting findings through multiple viewpoints and drawing conclusions. The paper discusses the steps of producing a longer research paper, including choosing a topic, taking organized notes, outlining, drafting, revising, and finalizing. It also covers appropriate formats and styles like APA and advantages like assembling extensive evidence, while noting limitations such as requiring more time and resources.
How to develop a research topic
The document provides guidance on developing a research topic through several steps:
1) Formulate a broad research theme by considering topics of interest and relevance to your field of study. Possible sources of inspiration include literature, current issues, and subject guides.
2) Develop a specific research question by refining your theme using techniques like the "5W method" and organizing concepts visually in diagrams. The research question should allow for elaboration rather than a simple yes/no answer.
3) Further narrow or expand your research topic if needed by taking notes on viewpoints, developments, keywords and evaluating questions based on interest level and scope. The goal is to define a clear topic that can be studied in depth.
literature-review
The document provides a step-by-step guide to conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as surveying scholarly sources on a topic to provide an overview of current knowledge and identify gaps. A 5-step process is outlined: 1) searching relevant literature by defining the topic and keywords, 2) evaluating and selecting sources, 3) identifying themes and gaps, 4) outlining the structure, and 5) writing the literature review. The introduction establishes the purpose, the body analyzes and interprets sources, and the conclusion summarizes key findings and implications.
New EE (2018) guidelines for ibdp sciences
The new extended essay guidelines for 2018 onwards provide guidance for science extended essays. The essay should be an original piece of writing or research of 4000 words that is structured like an academic essay rather than a lab report. It requires a clear introduction, development of two or more viewpoints, and a conclusion. Students must show an in-depth understanding of the topic and how their research question relates to current research. The best science essays demonstrate awareness of issues and place research in the context of current findings. Students must participate in three mandatory reflective sessions and complete a Reflection on Planning and Progress Form to document the process.
Plagiarism & Referencing 2014
This document provides information on referencing and plagiarism. It begins by stating the learning outcomes, which are to understand plagiarism and how to reference work using the Harvard system. It then defines plagiarism and discusses different types of plagiarism. The document also covers how to reference sources in-text and provide full references, highlighting important information to include. Various tools and guides for referencing are also mentioned.
Action Research Lit Review
The document provides guidance on writing a literature review for an action research proposal. It discusses including 10 or more peer-reviewed citations that support the proposed intervention or tools. It also addresses obtaining permission, controlling variables, and having a logical implementation plan. The introduction should define the topic and establish the criteria and organization for analyzing literature. The body groups studies by common factors and summarizes important works. The conclusion evaluates the field and identifies areas for future research.
Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi...
Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi...Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Dentistry
An overview on doing a literature review for a mutli-disciplinary professionals (physicians, engineers, and IT) covering some tips & tricks on organization (using Papers Software for literature files management, MindMapping for Literature Mapping, EndNote for bibliography program). It shows some examples of Citation Maps from Web of Science.Steps in the research process
When writing a research paper, it helps to follow a series of logical and progressive steps. this ensures a better end result!
Choosing research topic[1]
This document discusses various aspects of choosing a research topic, including:
- It is important to choose a topic you are interested in that is complex yet compelling. The topic should set the stage for your future research career.
- Generating ideas from course materials, news, the internet, advisors and literature. Attributes of a good topic include being feasible within the given resources and timeframe, and being worthwhile and providing new insights.
- Narrowing a topic by asking questions to refine the focus. Choosing a researchable question that is fact-based, relevant and action-oriented to provide direction for the research process.
1 literature review workshop-khalid
This document outlines an agenda for a literature review workshop led by Prof. Dr. Khalid Mahmood. The workshop covers topics such as searching for print and online sources, evaluating sources, reading critically, analyzing and synthesizing findings, writing and presenting literature reviews, and avoiding plagiarism. Training methods include lectures, question/answer sessions, sharing experiences, and discussing participants' research projects. The document defines a literature review and explains its purposes such as defining problems, placing studies in context, avoiding duplication, and suggesting hypotheses. It also distinguishes between narrative, systematic and meta-analysis types of literature reviews.
The Literature Review Process
The document provides guidance on conducting an effective literature review. It explains that a literature review (1) develops understanding of a field of study, synthesizes existing work through critical analysis, and must be current; (2) can be part of a larger research study to set context/scope and justify methodology, or a standalone assignment; and (3) is not a simple list of sources but requires making an argument. The review process involves selecting a topic, extensively searching relevant literature, developing arguments addressing what is known and how it relates to research questions, systematically surveying and critiquing the literature to analyze themes and debates, and writing a synthesis that builds on previous work.
Academic essay
Writing an academic essay involves structuring a coherent argument and presenting ideas in a logical order. A typical essay introduces the argument, analyzes evidence, considers counterarguments, and concludes. Different types of information like background context are often located in specialized sections. Successful essays anticipate questions readers may have like "what evidence supports the thesis?", "how does the thesis address counterarguments?", and "why does this matter?". Answering these questions fully helps structure the essay and ensure the argument has significance for readers.
T&l702 sum2014
This document provides an agenda for a class on principles of research. It discusses key aspects of graduate level research including conducting literature reviews. It outlines common errors in literature reviews such as not allowing enough time for search strategies or relying too heavily on secondary sources. The document then discusses how to properly conduct a literature review in the same way as primary research through problem formulation, data collection, evaluation, analysis and presentation. Finally, it discusses managing research through citation management programs and staying current using alerts.
What's hot (20)
Research As Inquiry: Improving Student Engagement in their Research Papers
Research As Inquiry: Improving Student Engagement in their Research Papers
Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi...
Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi...
Similar to Research guidance: R&EE
28.02.22 How to structure your research
This document provides guidance on structuring a dissertation or practice as research project. It discusses that research projects typically require sections and plentiful headings, while arts/humanities theses develop an argument through core chapters. Standard sections include an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Arts/humanities theses may combine the introduction, literature review and methodology into one chapter and have topic-focused discussion chapters. The document provides detailed guidance on writing each section, such as summarizing the research in the abstract and citing sources using the Harvard referencing style.
GROUP PROJECTCourse Name and CodeLibrary and Inform.docx
GROUP PROJECT
Course Name and Code
Library and Information Science
Due Date:
Tuesday ( 25 Apr 2017)
Total Marks:
100
Marked by:
Academic Integrity
Plagiarism
The practice of taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own. An example of plagiarism is to use creative works of another, without appropriate acknowledgment of the author or source.
Collusion
Secret or illegal cooperation in order to deceive others. Collusion is the presentation of an assignment as one’s own which is in fact the result in whole or in part of unauthorized collaboration with other person(s). Collusion involves the cooperation of two or more individuals in plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct.
Both plagiarism and collusion constitute cheating. Disciplinary action will be taken against students who engage in plagiarism and collusion.
Student Declaration
No.
Student ID
Student Name
Section
Marks Obtained
1.
2.
3.
I have read and understood the statement of academic integrity written above. I certify that the attached work is entirely my own except where work quoted is duly acknowledged in the text; that I have not worked with another person or persons except where specifically permitted by the teacher, and that this work has not been submitted for assessment by myself or any other person in any other time. I have retained a copy of my work.
LIS101 - LIBRARY INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SEMESTER 162
PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERALL MARK
· The Project carries 45% (100) of course marks
DUE DATE
· 10% from overall mark will be deducted per each day of late submission.
PROJECT FORMAT
· You are required to follow the given format:
· Type written
· Include all Headings
· Edited for typos and grammatical errors
· 1.5 spacing
· Font size - 11
· Lettering – Times New Roman
· Paragraphing – 1.5 spaces
· The Report is at least 5000 words, maximum 6000 words in length
Deliverables
· Each group must submit a hardcopy and softcopy of the project.
Project Description:
Working in groups of 2 to 3 students, find any topic that you are interested in from internet / library on the related information.
Task1:
· Write a research paper on the selected topic.
· Your paper should clearly follow the research process discussed in the class.
Figure 1 Research Process
· Your research should be supported and Cited by at least Six (6) sources.
TASK 2: Each group is to prepare a complete project report based on report outline given below.
REPORT OUTLINE:
CATEGORY
DESCRIPTION
1st PAGE
COVER PAGE ( state clearly your name, ID and section)
2nd PAGE
Report Assessment Rubric (see page 5)
3rd PAGE
Workload distribution (See page 8).
4th PAGE
Table of Content
5th PAGE
Abstract
6th PAGE ONWARDS
CONTENT
You should include:
1. Introduction of your given title and scope.
2. Body of Thesis (Topics that are related to information gathering that have been done based on generated questions).
3. ...
Feedback on the Literature Review PSP3 CW
This document provides feedback on a literature review completed by student Dorobantu, Adina. The assessor provides strengths of the literature review, including clear writing, wide range of literature covered, good scientific detail and critical analysis. Suggestions for improvement include being more critical of information presented, focusing on either pathogenic mechanisms or therapeutic strategies in more detail, and standardizing the bibliography presentation. The student comments they will use the feedback to improve future work.
Excellent Thesis
This document provides guidance on developing an excellent thesis. It discusses common mistakes made in understanding what a thesis requires, such as failure to establish a clear research gap or problem. The key stages of thesis development are outlined, including thinking of research topics, writing a proposal, conducting research, and writing/defending the thesis. Scientific research principles like objectivity, precision and verification are covered. Methodological issues like research design, data collection and analysis are addressed. The importance of a literature review, conceptual framework and coherent reasoning are emphasized. Tips are provided on writing each section of the thesis and avoiding common errors.
DefinitionThe goal of a research proposal is to present and justif.docx
Definition
The goal of a research proposal is to present and justify the need to study a research problem and to present the practical ways in which the proposed study should be conducted. The design elements and procedures for conducting the research are governed by standards within the predominant discipline in which the problem resides, so guidelines for research proposals are more exacting and less formal than a general project proposal. Research proposals contain extensive literature reviews. They must provide persuasive evidence that a need exists for the proposed study. In addition to providing a rationale, a proposal describes detailed methodology for conducting the research consistent with requirements of the professional or academic field and a statement on anticipated outcomes and/or benefits derived from the study's completion.
Krathwohl, David R.
How to Prepare a Dissertation Proposal: Suggestions for Students in Education and the Social and Behavioral Sciences
. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2005.
How to Approach Writing a Research Proposal
Your professor may assign the task of writing a research proposal for the following reasons:
Develop your skills in thinking about and designing a comprehensive research study;
Learn how to conduct a comprehensive review of the literature to ensure a research problem has not already been answered [or you may determine the problem has been answered ineffectively] and, in so doing, become better at locating scholarship related to your topic;
Improve your general research and writing skills;
Practice identifying the logical steps that must be taken to accomplish one's research goals;
Critically review, examine, and consider the use of different methods for gathering and analyzing data related to the research problem; and,
Nurture a sense of inquisitiveness within yourself and to help see yourself as an active participant in
the process of
doing scholarly research.
A proposal should contain all the key elements involved in designing a completed research study, with sufficient information that allows readers to assess the validity and usefulness of your proposed study. The only elements missing from a research proposal are the findings of the study and your analysis of those results. Finally, an effective proposal is judged on the quality of your writing and, therefore, it is important that your writing is coherent, clear, and compelling.
Regardless of the research problem you are investigating and the methodology you choose, all research proposals must address the following questions:
What do you plan to accomplish?
Be clear and succinct in defining the research problem and what it is you are proposing to research.
Why do you want to do it?
In addition to detailing your research design, you also must conduct a thorough review of the literature and provide convincing evidence that it is a topic worthy of study. Be sure to answer the "So What?" question.
How are you going to do it?
.
5. Introduction and background.ppt
The document provides guidance on writing proposals, specifically the introduction and background sections. It discusses including the main purpose of research, explaining the background and rationale by surveying literature, and showing how the proposed work will further knowledge. The introduction should state the research problem, provide context and rationale, describe issues and objectives, and define key concepts. The background section should provide an overview of previous relevant work, including strengths and weaknesses. Common mistakes in proposal writing like lack of focus or context are also outlined.
Literature review
The document discusses the purpose and process of conducting a literature review. It outlines that a literature review compares previous studies on a topic, provides background, and establishes importance and familiarity with prior work. A literature review develops a theoretical and conceptual framework. Key steps include researching and selecting relevant literature, reviewing sources, summarizing findings, synthesizing information, and critiquing past studies. The document also discusses evaluating literature reviews based on adequacy, clarity, impartialness, recency, and relevance.
Research, Writing, and Publishing in High Impact Journals
This is compilation of my presentations in a recent workshop at AMU Aligarh, India. Interested institutions can contact me for conducting similar workshop.
How to write a research proposal UP.ppt
The document provides guidelines for writing a good research proposal. It discusses that a research proposal introduces and justifies a plan of action for investigating a problem. It should identify the problem being studied, why it needs to be studied, the research methodology including variables, data collection techniques, and a work plan with timetable and resources required. The proposal preparation section notes that a proposal should convince readers that the proposed research is worthwhile and the researcher is competent to complete it. It should address what will be accomplished, why, and how through various elements like the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, methods, and discussion.
Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606 Subje
Assessment Information
Subject Code: BUS606
Subject Name: Business Research Proposal and Literature Review
Assessment Title: Assessment 3 – Final Research Proposal and Literature
Review
Weighting: 40 %
Total Marks:
Length:
40
3000 (not including reference list)
Due Date: Submission due Week 12 – Sunday at 11.59 pm
COURSE: Master of Business (Research)
Unit: Business Research Proposal and Literature Review
Unit Code: BUS606
Type of
Assessment:
Assessment 3 – Final Research Proposal and Literature Review
Unit Learning
Outcomes
addressed:
(a) Demonstrate an advanced ability to initiate and prepare an
original research proposal.
(b) Demonstrate an advanced ability to prepare a literature
review based on the support of an original research
proposal.
(c) Demonstrate a critical appreciation of the ethical issues
associated with an original research proposal and their
implications for the research and for the acceptability of the
research by an ethics review committee.
(d) Critically evaluate the coherence, relevance and
methodological merits of a given body of literature.
(e) Demonstrate a critical understanding of the theoretical,
practical and professional contexts and significance of the
research.
(f) Prepare a literature review that identifies and discriminates
between concepts, issues, key findings and relevant
theories most pertinent to the research proposal which the
review supports.
Criteria for
Assessment:
Knowledge and Understanding
Content and exploration of theories and ideas
Analysis, synthesis and critical engagement
Technical skills and referencing
Assessment Task:
In this task, you will develop a research proposal for a research
project addressing Leadership and Management issues that is
aligned to one of the Research Clusters in the School of Business.
This research proposal will be used to allocate your Research
Supervisors who will be appointed to supervisor your Master of
Business Research thesis and will also be reviewed by the
Research Committee to complete your Confirmation of Candidature
requirements.
Drawing on your synthesis of the existing research literature in
business and allied fields, you will identify a research question
based on the theoretical, professional, or organizational 'gap' for a
business problem that your proposed research will address. You will
analyze the implications of various theoretical approaches in order
to choose and develop an appropriate theoretical framework for
your research. You will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of
various methodological approaches before choosing and justifying a
preferred methodology for your research.
You research proposal and literature review should comprise the
following sections:
Research Project Title: A working title for the Master of Business
Research thesis that is no more than 12 words
Research Cluster: Identify ...
Research Proposal
The document provides guidance on drafting a research proposal. It discusses the key elements of a research proposal including an introduction, literature review, methodology, expected results, budget, and bibliography. It emphasizes that a proposal establishes the researcher's plan of action and investigation and justifies the need for the study. A good proposal convinces readers that the proposed research is important and the methodology is sound.
MODULE TITLE Research Methods and International Project - part .docx
MODULE TITLE: Research Methods and International Project - part 1 and part 2
Brief introduction to module
This module aims to provide you with the knowledge and skills that are required to undertake independent research on a topic that you will be chosen for your final dissertation where you determine the methodology and approach. In so doing you will take significant strides on the path to becoming an independent learner, and feel able to undertake other research tasks, with the help of your supervisor. The module will provide you with an understanding of research philosophies; introduce you to a range of qualitative and quantitative methodologies and methods of analysis. You will develop your intellectual reasoning ability as well as your ability to write critically. During the lecture and seminar classes you will be given opportunities to discuss and evaluate a range of research methods and approaches.
Overall assessment (part 1 and 2)
Course work
·
Research Project Proposal (35% of module marks)
Word count: 2,000 words++
·
International Business Project (65% of module marks)
Students are not to be penalised for exceeding the word count. They are encouraged to collect and analyse data, as well as discuss the findings and put forward recommendations, which requires a lengthier contribution.
Module learning outcomes:
• Be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of research method process, including identifying the research area, topic and question, critical literature review, research philosophy
and design, sampling and sampling techniques, data collection and analysis, synthesis and research dissemination
•
Demonstrate and understand the ethical consideration and issue as well as value of ethical procedures when conducting research in business
•
Be able to work collaboratively within a learning community, time management and self- management as well as the ability to use research skills in a wider context
•
Be able to develop an appropriate and feasible research proposal to a specific context
Research Project Proposal (35% of module marks)
The research methods proposal will enable students to build up a collection of material providing evidence of developing research skills. The core content of the proposal will consist of an exercise in each of the following five areas, corresponding to the Specific Learning Outcomes above (and will include both individual and group work).
Preliminary literature review should include 10+ references to relevant business/academic studies
Research design and its feasibility should be demonstrated
All potential ethical issues/concerns at each stage of the research project addressed
The outline of planned empirical investigation (time frame and resources) spans from the beginning of the project (brainstorming stage) till the thesis submission deadline.
The mandatory structure of the re.
Research methodology
The document provides an overview of the research methodology process for science and technology. It defines research and notes that research involves systematically collecting and analyzing data to increase understanding, interpreting data to draw conclusions, and building on past research rather than just restating facts. The document outlines Wallace's model for the research process and discusses key stages including proposing a research topic after reviewing literature, conducting the research, and documenting the work through publications like conference and journal papers. It also provides guidance on components of documentation like the research proposal, thesis, scientific writing format IMRAD, and considerations for publication.
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
The document discusses key components of a research paper such as the background of the study, conceptual framework, research hypothesis, statement of the research problem, and scope and delimitation of the study. It provides guidance on how to write an effective background section, including covering key concepts, maintaining balance, and avoiding ambiguity. Examples are given of different parts of a research paper like a background section and conceptual framework.
Assessment information subject code bus606 subje
This document provides information and instructions for Assessment 2, a literature review, for the subject BUS606 Literature Review for Master of Business. The literature review is worth 35% of the total marks for the subject and is due in Week 9. Students must submit a 2500 word literature review shaped by their research argument and theoretical orientation. It must conclude by identifying a need for research in the chosen area. The literature review will be assessed based on criteria including knowledge and understanding of the topic, content and exploration of theories, critical engagement, and referencing and technical skills.
Establishing your background of study: The Basics
The document discusses the importance of establishing a strong background for research. It states that a well-established background provides context for the study, helps justify the rationale by identifying gaps in existing research, and avoids redundancy. It also notes that reviewing previous literature and methodologies can guide research design and encourage critical thinking. Finally, a clear background enhances communication with readers and establishes the significance of the research.
IBL Cafe Dissertation Support David Phillips
The document provides guidance for students writing dissertations or extended essays in sociology. It discusses C. Wright Mills' concept of the sociological imagination and the importance of linking individual experiences to broader social and historical contexts. Students are encouraged to develop research questions that interest them and to consider appropriate methods for investigating their chosen topics. The document offers advice on various stages of the research process, including developing proposals, conducting research, and structuring final written assignments. It also provides examples of potential dissertation topics.
EG5000_Wk. 4.ppt
The document provides guidance for developing the theoretical framework and literature review sections of a dissertation. It outlines that the theoretical framework identifies and explains theories guiding the research questions and variables or phenomena being studied. The literature review must comprehensively synthesize prior empirical research on the topic, identify themes and gaps, and justify the dissertation's design, instruments, and population. It should demonstrate a thorough understanding of the research area and provide arguments for why the study is needed.
Lecture 1
Introduction lecture including module overview, assessments, blogging, tweeting, privacy and personal learning networks.
Literaturereview drfaisalal-allaf-copy-130716035723-phpapp01
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review for a research proposal. It discusses dealing with writing blocks, getting ready to write, elements of a proposal, what constitutes a literature review, why they are important, how to search for and evaluate literature, integrating findings, avoiding plagiarism, referencing, and characteristics of a good literature review. The document is authored by Dr. Faisal Al-Allaf and provides tips on all aspects of conducting and writing up a literature review for a research proposal.
Similar to Research guidance: R&EE (20)
GROUP PROJECTCourse Name and CodeLibrary and Inform.docx
GROUP PROJECTCourse Name and CodeLibrary and Inform.docx
DefinitionThe goal of a research proposal is to present and justif.docx
DefinitionThe goal of a research proposal is to present and justif.docx
Research, Writing, and Publishing in High Impact Journals
Research, Writing, and Publishing in High Impact Journals
MODULE TITLE Research Methods and International Project - part .docx
MODULE TITLE Research Methods and International Project - part .docx
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
Literaturereview drfaisalal-allaf-copy-130716035723-phpapp01
Literaturereview drfaisalal-allaf-copy-130716035723-phpapp01
More from Lee Hazeldine
Films and Buddhism
This document provides guidance on using films to teach about Buddhism. It lists several films that directly reference Buddhism, such as "The Little Buddha" and "Seven Years in Tibet", as well as films that touch on Buddhist themes without explicitly mentioning Buddhism, such as "The Matrix", "The Big Lebowski", and "Groundhog Day". It also recommends several Studio Ghibli films known for addressing Buddhist ideas, including "Princess Mononoke", "Spirited Away", and "My Neighbor Totoro". The document encourages discussing both films that portray Buddhism accurately and those that perpetuate stereotypes, in order to analyze how Buddhism is represented in media.
Webinar 2: The building blocks of Epistemic Insight.
A comprehensive discussion of the relationships between Big Questions, smaller questions, cross-disciplinary interventions and developing knowledge about disciplines (questions, methods and norms of thought). A guide to EI research methods and processes.
Why did the titanic sink year ks2
The document provides background information on the sinking of the Titanic, including a timeline of events and activities exploring the science and history of the disaster. The timeline indicates that the Titanic collided with an iceberg on April 14th, 1912, resulting in damage that caused it to sink on April 15th at 2:20 AM. The document then outlines science and history learning activities focusing on the materials used to build the Titanic, determining how many compartments would need to fill to cause it to sink, and discussing who or what was to blame.
EI Titanic
This document discusses exploring why the Titanic sank from different disciplinary perspectives such as science and history. It provides questions about the sinking that are more or less amenable to a science-based approach. Students are prompted to consider what is already known about why ships float and sink and how they would investigate factors like material, weight, and stability that could help explain why the Titanic sank. The document emphasizes using an inquiry-based approach and multidisciplinary lenses to understand historical events like the Titanic's sinking.
Epistemic insight keynote
This document outlines the Epistemic Insight initiative, which aims to develop students' understanding of different ways of knowing and the relationship between disciplines like science and religion. It provides curriculum frameworks and learning outcomes for different age groups that focus on questions, methods, and norms within and between disciplines. Research findings showed students and teachers see subjects as separate with little crossover. The initiative seeks to address student misconceptions about science and provide opportunities to explore "big questions" from multiple perspectives.
Epistemic Insight
This document discusses the Epistemic Insight Initiative led by Dr. Berry Billingsley at Canterbury Christ Church University. The initiative aims to promote epistemic insight, which is understanding how knowledge is constructed differently across academic disciplines. It provides examples of cross-disciplinary questions that could be explored in workshops. The document also references previous research which found that students and teachers see academic subjects as largely separate and that teachers may avoid questions outside their subject area. The initiative aims to help students recognize the distinct methods used in each discipline to build knowledge.
Rethinking teaching and learning assignment
This document outlines an assignment for a Primary Education course consisting of three parts: 1) planning and conducting a microteaching session in a group; 2) writing a rationale and reflection on the session; and 3) a critical comparison of how the session content could be taught using two different approaches. Students will only be assessed on parts 2 and 3, which should total 3000 words. The assignment aims to demonstrate understanding of connections between teaching, learning, and assessment in different educational contexts. [END SUMMARY]
Presentation skills
This document provides guidance on developing effective presentation skills. It discusses delivering presentations confidently through strong vocal delivery, maintaining good posture and eye contact. It emphasizes speaking instead of reading aloud and using notes as an aid instead of reading from slides. The document also covers structuring the content of presentations clearly through well-organized sections and signaling the structure to the audience. It provides tips for introducing the topic, concluding effectively, and using language to guide the audience through the presentation.
EI Research
This document discusses using research-engaged teaching and outreach to provide students a distinctive experience and recruit students. It proposes showcasing research centers and areas to students to show what the university values. Other universities consolidate research in key areas and have courses designed by research leaders with students doing research. The document suggests applying this approach to education research at the University of Canterbury, with a vision of students helping shape and progress beacon education research to make education better. Students could expect varying levels of research engagement from their programs.
Ba pt ppp directed task week 15
This document discusses developing thinking skills in students. It provides various strategies and considerations for supporting the development of thinking skills, including using questioning techniques, cognitive conflict, and non-traditional stimuli like films and artifacts. Developing higher-order thinking in students is important because it allows them to learn how to think, not just what to think. Teachers can support this development by using open-ended questions, group activities, and reflective practices to help students think critically about their own learning.
Research Project and critical writing
The literature review allows readers to understand a particular area of research by shaping the field. It is important to show what is important, explain key ideas, and evaluate and compare different sources. Critical analysis of sources is key, by evaluating each source individually, comparing sources, and relating sources back to the overall research question and issues being addressed. The reviewer's job is to select, analyze, and shape the literature by gathering and evaluating sources, selecting key themes, and organizing the review to make clear the significance and relationships between sources through commentary. A good review focuses on the literature, takes ownership of what the reviewer wants to say, and brings everything together logically to lead to a conclusion.
Padlet
Padlet is an online tool that allows users to collaboratively add content to digital bulletin boards. It can be used for brainstorming, group work, and sharing materials. Teachers can create Padlets for class introductions, discussions, gathering feedback, and more. Padlets can be accessed from any device with an internet connection. The tool is free and easy to set up, allowing teachers to quickly share collaborative boards with students.
WCW
This document discusses the wide range of opportunities available within the children's workforce in England. It estimates that around 3 million people, or 10% of the English workforce, work to improve outcomes for children and young people across all sectors of the economy. Examples are provided of the size of the children's workforce in different areas such as education, health, social services, and leisure. The document encourages readers to consider the variety of job roles that exist within different sectors and tiers of children's services and reflects on next steps one could take to explore opportunities within this large and diverse workforce.
Data collection strategies
Quantitative surveys and questionnaires use predominantly closed questions with pre-defined answers to collect standardized data that can be statistically analyzed. Proper research design and question design are essential to ensure the questions accurately measure intended concepts. Effective question types include multiple choice, ratings scales, and demographic questions that ask only one thing simply and clearly while relating to the research topic.
Qualitative methods like interviews and focus groups aim to gather in-depth details on specific topics. Interviews can be unstructured, semi-structured, or structured. Focus groups involve small group discussions to collectively understand circumstances, behaviors, and opinions, potentially providing greater insight due to group dynamics. Ethnographic research extensively observes groups in natural settings over long periods to experience regular
Generic introduction to evidence bundles for placement (1)
The document provides guidance for student teachers on collecting evidence bundles to demonstrate their impact on student learning and progress against the Teachers' Standards. It advises that evidence bundles should track the progress of all students and groups of students over time through lessons and assessments. Student teachers should plan which area to focus each evidence bundle on, collect relevant data, and reflect weekly with their mentor on progress and next steps.
Developing expertise to meet the teachers' standards ts 5 differentiation(1)
This document discusses differentiating instruction to meet the needs of all learners. It defines differentiation as identifying the most effective strategies for achieving learning goals for each student. The document outlines ways teachers can differentiate the process, product, content, and grouping based on students' readiness, interests, and learning styles. Teachers are encouraged to use assessments to understand students' prior knowledge and tailor instruction accordingly. Examples of differentiation strategies include varying activities, resources, support, tasks, and outcomes. The benefits and challenges of differentiation are discussed.
Prep
The document outlines a teacher's personalized action plan to develop their professional skills. It identifies several areas for growth based on lesson evaluations, reflections on practice, and feedback from mentors. The areas include challenging students to justify answers, using resources effectively, modeling joined-up handwriting, following assignment briefs, behavior management strategies, engagement techniques, helping students with emotional issues, and ensuring learning objectives are relevant to the curriculum. For each area, the teacher links it to teaching standards and outlines planned actions like practicing new strategies, researching approaches, observing other teachers, and exploring student work and school policies. The overall goal is to strengthen instructional planning and delivery through targeted self-reflection and improvement efforts.
Dev expert
This document discusses effective practices for setting learning intentions and success criteria to support student learning. It defines learning intentions as describing what students will know, understand, or be able to do by the end of a lesson. Success criteria should focus on describing the learning process rather than just the end product. Effective success criteria are specific, discussed with students, and used to guide self-assessment and feedback. The document provides examples of strong versus weak learning intentions and process-focused versus product-focused success criteria.
Developing expertise to meet aspects of the teachers' standards ts learning ...
The document discusses effective practices for setting clear learning intentions and success criteria to support student learning. It emphasizes that learning intentions should focus on what students will learn rather than just the task or activity. Success criteria are most helpful when they describe the process of achieving the learning intention ("process criteria") rather than just stating the expected product or outcome ("product criteria"). Providing students with well-structured learning intentions and success criteria at the beginning of a lesson helps focus learning and allows for self-assessment.
Professionalism the reflective practitioner
The document provides guidance for student teachers on developing professionalism, including reading key school policies, maintaining appropriate conduct and relationships with colleagues, responding effectively to feedback, and taking a reflective approach to continuously improve one's teaching practice. It also offers scenarios and questions to help students strengthen their reflection skills and better understand how to have productive conversations with their mentors about observation feedback.
More from Lee Hazeldine (20)
Webinar 2: The building blocks of Epistemic Insight.
Webinar 2: The building blocks of Epistemic Insight.
Generic introduction to evidence bundles for placement (1)
Generic introduction to evidence bundles for placement (1)
Developing expertise to meet the teachers' standards ts 5 differentiation(1)
Developing expertise to meet the teachers' standards ts 5 differentiation(1)
Developing expertise to meet aspects of the teachers' standards ts learning ...
Developing expertise to meet aspects of the teachers' standards ts learning ...
Recently uploaded
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP Module
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcRecently uploaded (20)
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Research guidance: R&EE
- 1. Research and Enquiry in Education October 4th
- 2. Purposes of your research To show awareness of aspects of policy and practice in a wider educational context To contextualise your professional development in recent research, current regulations, and guidance. To develop research skills To develop a critical understanding of research processes and research findings
- 3. Be aware of . . . Appropriate paperwork https://learn.canterbury.ac.uk/webapps/blackboard/content/listContentEditable.jsp? content_id=_1772101_1&course_id=_9403_1&content_id=_1772150_1 Harvard referencing https://learn.canterbury.ac.uk/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp Ethical issues - professionalism - confidentiality Criticality Tutor support Plagiarism [Turnitin] Deadlines
- 4. Deadlines REE option form to be submitted by 09.00am Friday 12th October 2018. Research proposal to be submitted to tutor by 2pm Friday 14th December 2018 Literature review to be submitted by 2pm Tuesday 19th March 2019 Presentation responding to “in setting” due 23/24 April
- 5. What the Investigation Should DoSet out the question/hypothesis you intend to investigate; Gather and collate your information; Assess the validity and reliability of the evidence; Put together your arguments and reasons; Arrive at a conclusion which addresses the question/hypothesis with which you started; Reflect the assessment criteria.
- 6. The Literature Review Provides the context for the presentation; Find and select relevant information; Draw on a range of sources; Consider the provenance of material; Demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the field; The range of literature should reflect the nature / length of the investigation (i.e. limited, but more than two or three) Use Google Scholar and CReaTE http://create.canterbury.ac.uk/
- 7. What we are looking for ‘Analytical writing looks at the evidence in a detailed and critical way. In particular, it weighs up the relative strengths and weaknesses of the evidence, pointing these out to the reader, so that it is clear how the writer has arrived at judgements and conclusions’ (Cottrell, 2005: 168)
- 8. Avoid Waffle – ill-structured writing whose focus is diffuse and leads nowhere; Avoidable Errors – please proof-read; Over Generalisation – Wild claims without evidence to support (sometimes it is better to suggest questions raised rather then making statements); Poor referencing – Inaccurate or incomplete bibliography.
- 9. Try To Think Whether We Could Ask These Questions How does this part/paragraph address the focus/question/issue? What is this paragraph about? How does it relate to the previous/next paragraph? Are you being critical or simply descriptive?
- 10. At Level Six Minimum Pass: Some knowledge of the literature. Key authors cited. Critical reading and research connected to argument; Good Pass: Sound understanding demonstrating theory/research in the literature and its application. Primary sources used; High Pass: Clear knowledge demonstrated of current research.
- 11. At Level Seven (M) 50-59%: Some critical understanding of reading shown, and appropriate links made to the research focus; 60-69%: Critical understanding of reading shown, and strong links made to the research focus; 70%+: Critical understanding of reading shows original insight, and strong links made to the research focus.
- 12. Developing Critical ReadingBe aware of the context [provenance] of what you read, such as -The size of the study is small; -The age of the study; -The bias of the author; -The location of the study; -The study fails to take ??? into account; -The study conflicts with another study; Importantly, none of these necessarily mean a study is worthless, but you have to recognise limitations.
- 13. The presentation Present and contextualize research findings Tutors will explain this in detail as each option is slightly different. 10 minutes presentation, 5 minutes for questions.
- 14. Deadlines reminder REE option form to be submitted by 09.00am Friday 12th October 2018. Research proposal to be submitted to tutor by 2pm Friday 30th November 2018 Literature review to be submitted by 2pm Friday 8th February 2019