3. A literature review is a way to:-
Compare studies and know “what is out there” on a
specific topic
4. The literature review is a critical look at the existing
research that is significant to the work that you are
carrying out.
1. To provide background information
2. To establish importance
3.To demonstrate familiarity
4.To “carre out a space” for further research
5.To make your research problem clear and bring focus
into it.
5. 6. Develop your methodology
7.To know where you are
8.To have a broader knowledge in your area of research
9.Research and select literature pertaining to your
area.
10.Review selected literature
11.Develop a theoretical framework (theories and
issues related your study)
6. 12.Develop a conceptual framework ( aspects you select
from theoretical framework that from the basis of your
research.)
13. Find out what is known about the subject
14. Find out whether the research has been done
before.
15.Build a case for carrying out research.
16.Show your expertise in the subject.
7. Articles in Journals
Books
Internet
Research reports
Governments documents
Abstracts
Reviews
Unpublished Theses
8. Adequacy: Is it done to a sufficient degree.
Clarity: Are all points clearly made?
Imperialness: Are actual findings cited rather than
opinions?
Regency: Are citations up- to-date?
Relevance: Are the citations related to the hypothesis?
9. Organization: Is the presentation of literature well
organized in terms of introduction, subheadings and
summary?
13. Chronological
Topical or thematic organization
Inverted pyramid organization/broad to narrow.
Seminal study.
14. Includes a clear research question or purpose
Make and argument for the necessity of your research
and/or service program etc.
Explains methods and theories if review is to be used
for a larger study or program
Describes search methodology—databases, search
terms etc.
Is through (include classic studies and a range of
literature, not just studies that make you point.
Is well organized, clear and concise
15. Focused:
The topic should be narrow. You should only present
ides and only report on studies that are closely related
to topic.
Concise:
Ideas should be presented economically. Don’t take my
more space than you need to present your ideas.
Logical :
The flow within and among paragraphs should be a
smoth, logical progression from one idea to the next
16. Developed:
Don’t leave the story half told.
Integrative:
Your paper should stress how the ideas in the studies are
related. Focus on the big picture. What commonality
do all the studies share? How are some studies
different than others? Your paper should stress how all
the studies reviewed contribute to your topic.
Current:
Your review should focus on work being done on the
cutting edge of your topic.
17. Vagueness due to too much or inappropriate
generalizations
Limited range
Insufficient information
Irrelevant material
Omission of contrasting view
Omission of recent work