What are Research Ethics?
Why are Research Ethics
Important?
General Ethical Principles
Ethical Decision Making in
Research
Ethical Standards for Human
Research.
What are Research Ethics?
Why are Research Ethics
Important?
General Ethical Principles
Ethical Decision Making in
Research
Ethical Standards for Human
Research.
Research Ethics :-
Ethics are norms of conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
Ethics are the principles and guidelines that help us to uphold things we value.
Meaning :-
Research ethics involves the application of fundamental ethical principles to a variety of topics involving scientific research.
Research ethics educates and monitors a scientist conducting a research to ensure a high ethical standards.
Basic Principles of Research Ethics :-
Honesty
Objectivity
Integrity
Carefulness
Openness
Respect for intellectual property
Confidentiality
Respect for Colleagues
Non discrimination
Social Responsibility
Its a paper presentation that tries to explore in detail, the ethical issues in research. The ethical issues presented cut across almost all the discipline; education, sociology, social science, humanities, e.t.c. In other words a multidisciplinary approach has been used to present these ethical issues in research.
This paper is based on the ethics of research writing. Plagiarism means stealing of ideas or thoughts or concepts of other person as your own without quoting or citing or referencing them. Representing other person thought as your own original work is an offence, so in order to avoid such plagiarism a author should know which are the common forms of plagiarism, what is the consequences of plagiarism, how to avoid them and what are the tools available to check plagiarism. Pramila Khushali Velip"Ethical Issues in Research Writing" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-5 , August 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd18329.pdf http://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/other/18329/ethical-issues-in-research-writing/pramila-khushali-velip
Principles and key responsibilities in research integrity, research data and ...ARDC
Dr Paul Taylor, Director, Research Integrity, Governance and Systems, RMIT, presented at the Research Integrity Advisor Research Data Management Workshop in Hobart, 2017
Ethical guidelines for educational researchPoligar
British Educational Research Association has published ethical guidelines in 2011 for global dissemination and adoption. Important principles from the guideline have been extracted in this PPT-file, prepared by me to help my colleague summarize the recommendations in ERICON-2017.
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
Research integrity means conducting research according to the highest professional and ethical standards, so that the results are trustworthy.
It concerns the behavior of researchers at all stages of the research life-cycle, including declaring competing interests; data collection and data management; using appropriate methodology; drawing conclusions from results; and writing up research findings.
Research Ethics :-
Ethics are norms of conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
Ethics are the principles and guidelines that help us to uphold things we value.
Meaning :-
Research ethics involves the application of fundamental ethical principles to a variety of topics involving scientific research.
Research ethics educates and monitors a scientist conducting a research to ensure a high ethical standards.
Basic Principles of Research Ethics :-
Honesty
Objectivity
Integrity
Carefulness
Openness
Respect for intellectual property
Confidentiality
Respect for Colleagues
Non discrimination
Social Responsibility
Its a paper presentation that tries to explore in detail, the ethical issues in research. The ethical issues presented cut across almost all the discipline; education, sociology, social science, humanities, e.t.c. In other words a multidisciplinary approach has been used to present these ethical issues in research.
This paper is based on the ethics of research writing. Plagiarism means stealing of ideas or thoughts or concepts of other person as your own without quoting or citing or referencing them. Representing other person thought as your own original work is an offence, so in order to avoid such plagiarism a author should know which are the common forms of plagiarism, what is the consequences of plagiarism, how to avoid them and what are the tools available to check plagiarism. Pramila Khushali Velip"Ethical Issues in Research Writing" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-5 , August 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd18329.pdf http://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/other/18329/ethical-issues-in-research-writing/pramila-khushali-velip
Principles and key responsibilities in research integrity, research data and ...ARDC
Dr Paul Taylor, Director, Research Integrity, Governance and Systems, RMIT, presented at the Research Integrity Advisor Research Data Management Workshop in Hobart, 2017
Ethical guidelines for educational researchPoligar
British Educational Research Association has published ethical guidelines in 2011 for global dissemination and adoption. Important principles from the guideline have been extracted in this PPT-file, prepared by me to help my colleague summarize the recommendations in ERICON-2017.
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
Research integrity means conducting research according to the highest professional and ethical standards, so that the results are trustworthy.
It concerns the behavior of researchers at all stages of the research life-cycle, including declaring competing interests; data collection and data management; using appropriate methodology; drawing conclusions from results; and writing up research findings.
1.Use the following guidelines to critique the research article SantosConleyha
1.
Use the following guidelines to critique the research article provided.
There is a
distinct difference between critiquing and reporting.
Make sure you critique and
provide the analysis of “why” in your support.
Refer to Chapter 18 for specific
critiquing questions. Guidelines adapted from:
Gray, J.R., & Grove, S.K. (2021).
The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of
evidence
(9
th
ed.). Elsevier
.
2.
Prepare your paper using APA format 7
th
edition.
3.
No abstract is required.
4.
Page length should be no more than 4 pages, excluding title and reference
pages.
TITLE
(3 points)
Does the title represent the focus of the study?
Abstract (3 points)
Does the abstract summarize the purpose of the study, qualitative approach, sample
and key findings?
Research Problem (5 Points)
What is the phenomenon of interest? Is it explicit? Significance to the researcher noted?
To nursing?
Purpose and Research Questions (5 points)
Clearly stated? Logical approach to addressing the research problem of the study?
Addresses population as connected to identified problem?
Are there explicit questions? Are they consistent with the framework, problem, and
purpose?
Is a qualitative method appropriate to answer the research questions?
Literature Review (4 points)
References current? Reviews previous studies and theories? Critically appraises and
synthesizes the studies? Summarizes what is known and not known?
Philosophical Foundation/Theoretical Perspective (5 points)
2
Philosophical theory and perspective described? Primary source cited for the
philosophical foundation/theory? Broad philosophy used? If so was a specific
philosopher identified?
Research Design (5 points)
Is the design appropriate based on the qualitative method chosen? What is that stated
or implied research approach? Describe the qualitative research perspective and state if
the researcher was true to the design? Is the research question asked, appropriate for
the methodology? (Gray, Grove & Sutherland, 2017, Chapter 4 may be helpful in
reviewing different qualitative research methodologies).
Sample and Setting (5 points)
What sampling method was used? Is it appropriate for the type of study?
Was the sample described? How were participants selected and recruited? What was
the site(s) for participant selection? Was the inclusion and exclusion criteria for
participant selection described? Was the sample size sufficient and how was it
determined? Was data saturation described? What was the role of the researcher in the
sampling process?
Data Collection
(20 points)
What was the data collection process?
Discuss the period of time for the interviews and
data collection period? Describe the data collection process (individual interviews or
focus groups)? Was the research study conducted in a consistent manner or if changes
were made were they described?
Was protection of human subjects addressed? Did an Institutional Review Board
approve the study ...
1.Use the following guidelines to critique the research article BenitoSumpter862
1.
Use the following guidelines to critique the research article provided.
There is a
distinct difference between critiquing and reporting.
Make sure you critique and
provide the analysis of “why” in your support.
Refer to Chapter 18 for specific
critiquing questions. Guidelines adapted from:
Gray, J.R., & Grove, S.K. (2021).
The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of
evidence
(9
th
ed.). Elsevier
.
2.
Prepare your paper using APA format 7
th
edition.
3.
No abstract is required.
4.
Page length should be no more than 4 pages, excluding title and reference
pages.
TITLE
(3 points)
Does the title represent the focus of the study?
Abstract (3 points)
Does the abstract summarize the purpose of the study, qualitative approach, sample
and key findings?
Research Problem (5 Points)
What is the phenomenon of interest? Is it explicit? Significance to the researcher noted?
To nursing?
Purpose and Research Questions (5 points)
Clearly stated? Logical approach to addressing the research problem of the study?
Addresses population as connected to identified problem?
Are there explicit questions? Are they consistent with the framework, problem, and
purpose?
Is a qualitative method appropriate to answer the research questions?
Literature Review (4 points)
References current? Reviews previous studies and theories? Critically appraises and
synthesizes the studies? Summarizes what is known and not known?
Philosophical Foundation/Theoretical Perspective (5 points)
2
Philosophical theory and perspective described? Primary source cited for the
philosophical foundation/theory? Broad philosophy used? If so was a specific
philosopher identified?
Research Design (5 points)
Is the design appropriate based on the qualitative method chosen? What is that stated
or implied research approach? Describe the qualitative research perspective and state if
the researcher was true to the design? Is the research question asked, appropriate for
the methodology? (Gray, Grove & Sutherland, 2017, Chapter 4 may be helpful in
reviewing different qualitative research methodologies).
Sample and Setting (5 points)
What sampling method was used? Is it appropriate for the type of study?
Was the sample described? How were participants selected and recruited? What was
the site(s) for participant selection? Was the inclusion and exclusion criteria for
participant selection described? Was the sample size sufficient and how was it
determined? Was data saturation described? What was the role of the researcher in the
sampling process?
Data Collection
(20 points)
What was the data collection process?
Discuss the period of time for the interviews and
data collection period? Describe the data collection process (individual interviews or
focus groups)? Was the research study conducted in a consistent manner or if changes
were made were they described?
Was protection of human subjects addressed? Did an Institutional Review Board
approve the study ...
Presentasjon fra Helene Ingierd i forbindelse med foredraget "Research ethics, scientific misconduct and questionable practices". Foredraget ble holdt online den 23. september 2020.
Topic for capstone .Implementing Opiod Risk assessment tool .docxnanamonkton
Topic for capstone
.Implementing Opiod Risk assessment tool from a multidisciplinary pain management approach
The purpose of the doctoral capstone project was to: (a) provide education to nursing staff on implementing a structured risk assessment tool in order to identify risk for imminent aggression, manage risk for imminent aggressive behaviors
Write a 6-8 page double-spaced paper with an additional template in which you analyze potential ethical considerations that may arise from your doctoral project. Determine strategies to address these ethical considerations.
Introduction
Ethical researchers act in honest ways. Ethics are conduct norms or standards that distinguish between right and wrong and acceptable and unacceptable behaviors. Ethical considerations matter because they guard against the fabrication or falsification of data. They promote the pursuit of knowledge and truth, research’s primary goal. Ethical behavior is also crucial for collaborative work because it encourages an environment of trust, accountability, and mutual respect among team members. Likewise, researchers must adhere to ethical standards for the public to support and believe in the research. Although most quality improvement and evidence based practice projects pose minimal risk to human subjects, an IRB screening process for your capstone project is required to ensure the project is meeting the appropriate ethical standards.
The Nuremberg Code (1947) protects human rights and is the leading code for conducting ethical research. It focuses on:
Voluntary informed consent.
Freedom to withdraw from research.
Protection from physical and mental harm.
Protection from suffering and death.
It also emphasizes the risk-benefit balance of conducting research. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) underscored the importance of protecting subjects in research and strongly proclaimed that individuals’ well-being takes precedence over scientific and social interests.
Good research is well planned, appropriately designed, and ethically approved. Developing and following a research protocol helps to ensure this. Research needs to seek to answer specific questions rather than just collect data. Researchers must obtain approval from the Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee. Researchers also need to pay special attention to vulnerable subjects to avoid breech of ethical codes. Although most quality improvement and evidence based practice projects pose minimal risk to human subjects, an IRB screening process for your capstone project is required to ensure the project is meeting the appropriate ethical standards.
The major ethical issues in conducting research usually involve:
Informed consent.
Beneficence—do no harm.
Respect for anonymity and confidentiality.
Respect for privacy.
You are responsible to ensure your project is conducted ethically and responsibly from planning to publication. Be familiar with ethical principles and follow them strictly. Di.
The Role and Importance of ResearchWhat you’ll Learn about in th.docxssusera34210
The Role and Importance of Research
What you’ll Learn about in this Chapter:
· Who does research and why
· How research is defined and what some of its purposes are
· What a model of scientific inquiry is and how it guides research activities
· Some of the things that research is and some of the things that it isn’t
· What researchers do and how they do it
· The characteristics of good research
· How a method of scientific inquiry guides research activity
· The different types of research methods and examples of each
Say Hello to Research!
Walk down the hall in any building on your campus where social and behavioral science professors have their offices in such departments as psychology, education, nursing, sociology, and human development. Do you see any bearded, disheveled, white-coated men wearing rumpled pants and smoking pipes, hunched over their computers and mumbling to themselves? How about disheveled, white-coated women wearing rumpled skirts, smoking pipes, hunched over their computers, and mumbling to themselves?
Researchers hard at work? No. Stereotypes of what scientists look like and do? Yes. What you are more likely to see in the halls of your classroom building or in your adviser’s office are men and women of all ages who are hard at work. They are committed to finding the answer to just another piece of the great puzzle that helps us understand human behavior a little better than the previous generation of scientists.
Like everyone else, these people go to work in the morning, but unlike many others, these researchers have a passion for understanding what they study and for coming as close as possible to finding the “truth.” Although these truths can be elusive and sometimes even unobtainable, researchers work toward discovering them for the satisfaction of answering important questions and then using this new information to help others. Early intervention programs, treatments of psychopathology, new curricula, conflict resolution techniques, effective drug treatment programs, and even changes in policy and law have resulted from evidence collected by researchers. Although not always perfect, each little bit of evidence gained from a new study or a new idea for a study contributes to a vast legacy of knowledge for the next generation of researchers such as yourself.
You may already know and appreciate something about the world of research. The purpose of this book is to provide you with the tools you need to do even more, such as
Today, more than ever, decisions are evidence based, and what these researchers do is collect evidence that serves as a basis for informed decisions.
· develop an understanding of the research process.
· prepare yourself to conduct research of your own.
· learn how to judge the quality of research.
· learn how to read, search through, and summarize other research.
· learn the value of research activities conducted online.
· reveal the mysteries of basic statistics and show you how easily they can be ...
In this PPT the viewer will able to understand the necessity of research. Why it is required, how it is going to helpful to other scholar, scientist, businessman, film maker, industrialist and public. The main purposes of research are to inform action, gather evidence for theories, and contribute to developing knowledge in a field of study.
Portion explained:
Research Is Necessary and Valuable:
1. It's a tool for building knowledge and facilitating learning.
2. It's a means to understand issues and increase public awareness.
3. It helps us succeed in business.
4. It allows us to disprove lies and support truths.
5. It is a means to find, gauge, and seize opportunities.
6. It promotes a love of and confidence in reading, writing, analyzing, and sharing valuable information.
7. It provides nourishment and exercise for the mind.
when you take info from sites, you should take care of copyrights and other things you should put them into your consideration, you will know them in this presentation.
the beginning of any research defines its strength. the first thing to present to your sponsor and gives him the outlines to your research is stated in "concept paper".
This presentation, created by Syed Faiz ul Hassan, explores the profound influence of media on public perception and behavior. It delves into the evolution of media from oral traditions to modern digital and social media platforms. Key topics include the role of media in information propagation, socialization, crisis awareness, globalization, and education. The presentation also examines media influence through agenda setting, propaganda, and manipulative techniques used by advertisers and marketers. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of surveillance enabled by media technologies on personal behavior and preferences. Through this comprehensive overview, the presentation aims to shed light on how media shapes collective consciousness and public opinion.
Mastering the Concepts Tested in the Databricks Certified Data Engineer Assoc...SkillCertProExams
• For a full set of 760+ questions. Go to
https://skillcertpro.com/product/databricks-certified-data-engineer-associate-exam-questions/
• SkillCertPro offers detailed explanations to each question which helps to understand the concepts better.
• It is recommended to score above 85% in SkillCertPro exams before attempting a real exam.
• SkillCertPro updates exam questions every 2 weeks.
• You will get life time access and life time free updates
• SkillCertPro assures 100% pass guarantee in first attempt.
Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity • a micro report by Rosie WellsRosie Wells
Insight: In a landscape where traditional narrative structures are giving way to fragmented and non-linear forms of storytelling, there lies immense potential for creativity and exploration.
'Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity' is a micro report from Rosie Wells.
Rosie Wells is an Arts & Cultural Strategist uniquely positioned at the intersection of grassroots and mainstream storytelling.
Their work is focused on developing meaningful and lasting connections that can drive social change.
Please download this presentation to enjoy the hyperlinks!
1. A Team of four students worked together on a research
paper, and while each person made contributions to the
study, some had greater involvement and responsibility
for the manuscript than others, Two team members did
everything from developing the study concept and
design, data acquisition and interpretation, to writing
and finalizing the draft for publication. The order two
helped with the research, such as assisting with lap
experiments, but had no input into the manuscript. Do all
these authors fit the definition of authorship, regardless
of the journals ?
Yes
No
2. Let’s say an international journals accept your
paper for publication. Is it always okay to submit a
version of that paper in a Arabic to a local journal
or does that count as duplicate submission ?
Yes it’s okay it doesn’t count as duplicate
submission
No it’s not okay, it counts as duplicate
submission
22. References
• Elsevier Ethics in Research and Publications Course ‐‐
http://www.elsevier.com/ethics/home
• National Institute of Health Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research ‐‐
http://grants.nih.gov/training/responsibleconduct.htm
• Missouri State University Research Ethics Workshop
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1499&v=pNkitSfpbjI
• https://researchethics.ca/what-is-research-ethics/
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L70aQy_APtE&t=4s
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdY8fRB95v8
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdY8fRB95v8&t=2s
Thank You