This document provides an overview of key concepts in radiation protection for diagnostic radiology, including:
- Medical exposure involves exposing patients for diagnosis or treatment, following principles of justification and optimization.
- Justification involves assessing if a procedure does more good than harm at the individual, generic, and general levels.
- Optimization aims to keep patient doses as low as reasonably achievable given image quality needs.
- Guidance levels indicate typical dose levels and help identify unusually high exposures requiring review. They are not dose limits.
Radiation protection, also known as radiological protection, is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "The protection of people from harmful effects of exposure to ionizing radiation, and the means for achieving this". Exposure can be from a source of radiation external to the human body or due to internal irradiation caused by the ingestion of radioactive contamination.
Ionizing radiation is widely used in industry and medicine, and can present a significant health hazard by causing microscopic damage to living tissue. There are two main categories of ionizing radiation health effects. At high exposures, it can cause "tissue" effects, also called "deterministic" effects due to the certainty of them happening, conventionally indicated by the unit gray and resulting in acute radiation syndrome. For low level exposures there can be statistically elevated risks of radiation-induced cancer, called "stochastic effects" due to the uncertainty of them happening, conventionally indicated by the unit sievert.
Fundamental to radiation protection is the avoidance or reduction of dose using the simple protective measures of time, distance and shielding. The duration of exposure should be limited to that necessary, the distance from the source of radiation should be maxi mised, and the source shielded wherever possible. To measure personal dose uptake in occupational or emergency exposure, for external radiation personal dosimeters are used, and for internal dose to due to ingestion of radioactive contamination, bioassay techniques are applied.
This power-point presentation is very important for radiology resident radiologist and radiographers and technician. this includes principles, technique , biological effects of radiation and how to protect, whats should normal radiation dose with latest update. This slide also includes ALARA PRINCIPLE thanks.
Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, MDIRT Nchanj...Nchanji Nkeh Keneth
Radiation Protection; an overview of ionising radiations. Radiation measuring instruments. Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, credit to IAEA
Radiation protection, also known as radiological protection, is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "The protection of people from harmful effects of exposure to ionizing radiation, and the means for achieving this". Exposure can be from a source of radiation external to the human body or due to internal irradiation caused by the ingestion of radioactive contamination.
Ionizing radiation is widely used in industry and medicine, and can present a significant health hazard by causing microscopic damage to living tissue. There are two main categories of ionizing radiation health effects. At high exposures, it can cause "tissue" effects, also called "deterministic" effects due to the certainty of them happening, conventionally indicated by the unit gray and resulting in acute radiation syndrome. For low level exposures there can be statistically elevated risks of radiation-induced cancer, called "stochastic effects" due to the uncertainty of them happening, conventionally indicated by the unit sievert.
Fundamental to radiation protection is the avoidance or reduction of dose using the simple protective measures of time, distance and shielding. The duration of exposure should be limited to that necessary, the distance from the source of radiation should be maxi mised, and the source shielded wherever possible. To measure personal dose uptake in occupational or emergency exposure, for external radiation personal dosimeters are used, and for internal dose to due to ingestion of radioactive contamination, bioassay techniques are applied.
This power-point presentation is very important for radiology resident radiologist and radiographers and technician. this includes principles, technique , biological effects of radiation and how to protect, whats should normal radiation dose with latest update. This slide also includes ALARA PRINCIPLE thanks.
Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, MDIRT Nchanj...Nchanji Nkeh Keneth
Radiation Protection; an overview of ionising radiations. Radiation measuring instruments. Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, credit to IAEA
Quality Assurance Programme in Computed TomographyRamzee Small
Introduction to Computed Tomography
Basic description of the components of a CT System
Introduction to Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Tests in Computed Tomography base on frequency
Objective of QA/QC Test
Quality Assurance Programme in Computed TomographyRamzee Small
Introduction to Computed Tomography
Basic description of the components of a CT System
Introduction to Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Tests in Computed Tomography base on frequency
Objective of QA/QC Test
Please enjoy our X-Ray Safety Presentation by Peter Wright, CEO of Alternate Systems. For the full presentation & certification process please call us at 972.964.3124.
Current literature on dental radiology was reviewed in order to seek justification for radiological protection of patients in dental radiography, to explore the different factors affecting patient dose and to derive practical guidance on how to achieve radiological protection of patients in dentistry. Individual doses incurred in dental radiology are in general relatively low, however it is generally accepted that there is no safe level of radiation dose and that no matter how low the doses received are, there is a mathematical probability of an effect. Hence appropriate patient protection measures must be instituted to keep the exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). The literature review demonstrated that there is considerable scope for significant dose reductions in dental radiology using the techniques of optimization of protection.
Most dental professionals are not convinced of the need for regulatory control of dental radiography practice. They believe doses are too low to warrant regulatory control and consequently patient protective measures. This study shows that individual doses in dental radiology are relatively low. However, there is no safe level of radiation dose and that no
matter how low the doses received are, there is a
mathematical probability of an effect. Consequently, appropriate patient protection measures must be instituted to keep exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
Assessment of Health Care Workers Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Radiat...ijtsrd
Radiological doses are low and the chances of long time effect is minimal, but it should be kept as low as reasonably achievable. Therefore health workers especially Doctors requesting for imaging must be well trained in deciding when medical imaging should be carried out and should also have accurate knowledge of the associated risk involved. This can only be achieved if a proper knowledge and safety practice is adhered to. A cross sectional study to investigate the level of health workers knowledge, about radiation safety and their attitude towards radiation safety was carried out. A self administered questionnaire for radiation safety was sent to a purposive sample of 174 Health workers at a Specialist Hospital, in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. 169 questionnaires were filled and return by participant responsive rate 97.1 . The sample include 8 Radiologist, 72 Nurses, 3 Oncologist, 49 Clinicians, 26 Technicians and 11 Surgeons. Majority of the participants have never attain any radiation safety related training 76 . Radiologist and oncologist who were more frequently expose to ionizing radiation, their knowledge was not far better than the other health workers. The general knowledge score ranges from 5.9 to 60.9 , with a low score among nurses and surgeons. The most alarming was the applicability and convenience of radiation protection policies and procedure. Adherence to safety precaution practices was mostly violated by participants, especially nurses and surgeons, but they attributed it to the poor application of protective measures during performing the procedures. The investigation concluded that Health workers in a Specialist Hospital, Jos Plateau State, Nigeria have fair knowledge, negative attitude and poor safety practices towards radiation safety policies and precautions. Chenko G. Y. Nimchang | Ndam Moses Ponsel | Manset W. E. | Songden S. D "Assessment of Health Care Workers Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Radiation Safety at a Specialist Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-6 | Issue-6 , October 2022, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd46452.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/medicine/nursing/46452/assessment-of-health-care-workers-knowledge-attitude-and-practices-of-radiation-safety-at-a-specialist-hospital-jos-plateau-state-nigeria/chenko-g-y-nimchang
Radiation Protection by Irum Khan (Medical Imaging Technologist)irumk746
Radiation Protection
Introduction:Since the announcement of the discovery of X Rays by Röntgen in December 1895, X-rays and the radiological techniques associated with their use have become increasingly central tools in medical diagnosis and management.
As a result of the growth in the usefulness of imaging, other, non-radiation-based, imaging techniques have been developed (e.g. ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging), and image-guided interventional means of treating patients have become common place. The benefits to patients from these methods of investigation and treatment have been immeasurable.
However, it would be unwise to imagine that no harm can come to patients from the use of radiation-based and other imaging techniques, or from interventional radiology procedures.
Radiation protection is a key aspect of maintaining the safety of patients and Radiation worker in diagnostic and interventional radiology.
Human Responses to Ionizing Radiation DETERMINISTIC EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON HUMANS
1. Acute radiation syndrome
a. Hematologic syndrome
b. Gastrointestinal syndrome
c. Central nervous system syndrome
2. Local tissue damage
a. Skin
b. Gonads
c. Extremities
3. Hematologic depression
4. Cytogenetic damage
STOCHASTIC EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON HUMANS
. Leukemia
2. Other malignant disease
a. Bone cancer
b. Lung cancer
c. Thyroid cancer
d. Breast cancer
3. Local tissue damage
a. Skin
b. Gonads
c. Eyes
4. Shortening of life span
5. Genetic damage
EFFECTS OF FETAL IRRADIATION
Prenatal death
2. Neonatal death
3. Congenital malformation
4. Childhood malignancy
5. Diminished growth and development
Purpose Of Radiation Protection
The principle purpose of radiation protection are
To minimize patient exposure in medical diagnostic radiology
To ensure adequate protection of person operating or using x ray equipment.(Radiologist, Medical Imaging Technologist, Radiographer)
To ensure adequate protection of the general public in the vicinity areas where diagnostic procedure are in progress.
The three fundamental principles of radiation protection of patients are
Justification
Optimisation
The application of Dose Limit
The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is responsible for the development of these principles.
Justification
The justification principle is anecdotally known as the benefit vs risk principle; that is, an individual's exposure to medical radiation should always have a greater benefit to the patient as to outweigh the negative consequences of the proposed examination. For example, the benefit in requesting a CT brain for a patient that has suffered significant head trauma generally outweighs any negative outcomes associated with that radiation exposure.
If the exposure has no justification then it should be avoided regardless of how small the dose might be.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
Radiation protection Overview
1. RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY L 1: Overview of Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology IAEA Training Material on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
2.
3.
4.
5. Part 1: Overview of Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology Topic 1: Definition of medical exposure IAEA Training Material on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
8. My resident doctor has got 12 mSv in her last badge report as she was wearing the badge while getting her barium study. She wants off from radiation work. ?????
9. While holding his child in diagnostic examination Mr. Joseph got 2 mSv. As a member of the public with 1 mSv dose limit, he can not get any radiation dose this year. ???????
14. Part 1: Overview of Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology Topic 2: Justification IAEA Training Material on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21. Part 1: Overview of Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology Topic 3: Optimization IAEA Training Material on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
22.
23.
24. Part 1: Overview of Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology Topic 4: Guidance (or reference) levels - practical aspects IAEA Training Material on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36. Part 1: Overview of Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology Topic 5: Guidance levels and effective doses IAEA Training Material on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
37. Guidance levels for diagnostic radiography (typical adult patient) 10 Abdomen, IVU and cholecystography AP 40 Lumbar spine LSJ 30 Lumbar spine LAT 10 Lumbar spine AP Entrance surface dose per radiograph (mGy) Examination
38. Guidance levels for diagnostic radiography (typical adult patient) 1.5 Chest LAT 0.4 Chest PA 10 Hip joint AP 10 Pelvis AP Entrance surface dose per radiograph (mGy) Examination
39. Guidance levels for diagnostic radiography (typical adult patient) 5 Dental AP 7 Dental peri-apical 20 Thoracic spine LAT 7 Thoracic spine AP Entrance surface dose per radiograph (mGy) Examination
40. Guidance levels for diagnostic radiography (typical adult patient) Dose values are in air with backscatter. They are for conventional film-screen combination (200 speed class). For higher speed film-screen combinations (400-600), the values should be reduced by a factor of 2 to 3. 3 Skull LAT 5 Skull AP Entrance surface dose per radiograph (mGy) Examination
41. Dose guidance levels in CT (typical adult patient) 35 Lumbar spine (a) Derived from measurements on the axis of rotation in water equivalent phantoms, 15 cm in length and 16 cm (head) and 30 cm (lumbar spine and abdomen) in diameter. 25 Abdomen 50 Head Multiple scan average dose (mGy) (a) Examination
42. Dose guidance levels for mammography (typical adult patient) Determined in a 4.5 cm compressed breast consisting of 50% glandular and 50% adipose tissue, for film-screen systems and dedicated Mo-target/Mo-filter mammography units. 1 mGy (without grid 3 mGy (with grid) Average glandular dose per craniocaudal projection
43. Dose rate guidance levels for fluoroscopy (typical adult patient) (a) In air with backscatter (b) For fluoroscopes that have an optional 'high level' operational mode, such as those frequently used in interventional radiology 100 High Level (b) 25 Normal Entrance surface dose (mGy/min) (a) Operation Mode
44. Typical effective doses from diagnostic medical exposures From: Referral Criteria For Imaging. CE, 2000. 7 months 4 months 11 days 3 days Approx. equiv. period of natural background radiation 1.3 0.7 0.07 0.02 Typical effective dose (mSv) 65 Lumbar spine 35 Thoracic spine 3.5 Skull 1 Chest (single PA film) Equiv. no. of chest x-rays Diagnostic procedure
45. Typical effective doses from diagnostic medical exposures From: Referral Criteria For Imaging. CE, 2000. 14 months 6 months 4 months 7 weeks Approx. equiv. period of natural background radiation 2.5 1.0 0.7 0.3 Typical effective dose (mSv) 125 IVU 50 Abdomen 35 Pelvis 15 Hip Equiv. no. of chest x-rays Diagnostic procedure
46. Typical effective doses from diagnostic medical exposures From: Referral Criteria For Imaging. CE, 2000. 3.2 years 16 months 16 months 6 months Approx. equiv. period of natural background radiation 7 3 3 1.5 Typical effective dose (mSv) 350 Barium enema 150 Barium follow through 150 Barium meal 75 Barium swallow Equiv. no. of chest x-rays Diagnostic procedure
47. Typical effective doses from diagnostic medical exposures From: Referral Criteria For Imaging. CE, 2000. 4.5 years 3.6 years 1 year Approx. equiv. period of natural background radiation 10 8 2.3 Typical effective dose (mSv) 500 CT Abdomen or pelvis 400 CT chest 115 CT head Equiv. no. of chest x-rays Diagnostic procedure
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
Editor's Notes
Part …: ( Add part number and title) Module…: ( Add module number and title) Lesson …: ( Add session number and title) Learning objectives: Upon completion of this lesson, the students will be able to: … . (Add a list of what the students are expected to learn or be able to do upon completion of the session) Activity: ( Add the method used for presenting or conducting the lesson – lecture, demonstration, exercise, laboratory exercise, case study, simulation, etc.) Duration: ( Add presentation time or duration of the session – hrs) Materials and equipment needed: (List materials and equipment needed to conduct the session, if appropriate) References: (List the references for the session)