publishing steps PhD

1. publishing steps PhD
Promising presentation –
Rana Abdullah Tahan
PHD researcher https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1093-7740

2. - What to publish :
choose a part of a letter worth publishing
(review of previous studies, methodology, study
results), separate it from the research and start
building to become an independent study.
- Where to publish :
look for specialized scientific journals in the part
of the study that you intend to publish example if
you use the literature review it is better to target
scientific journals that publish reviews and there
are many scientific journals and need to practice
research in order to learn and can consult
colleagues or supervisor in order to
determine(PubMed, Web of Science , Scopus)
- There are workshops on the sidelines of some
conferences specialized in discussing and
criticizing publishing projects for beginners and
taking advantage of Support Centers for publishing
and writing at the University and show what you
wrote to professors other than your university
supervisor
- After determining the magazine you have to
adapt the study and its content and references to

3. suit the requirements of the magazine and there are
some magazines do this fees, but it is preferable
that the researcher learns these procedures himself
and the reason may continue to send the study and
rejection for some time to more than one magazine
and each magazine
-Before sending the study, register your name as a
researcher in research and publishing platforms
such as (Google scholar , researchgate , EndNote
online , Mendeley ) , Get a researcher number -
Thomsonreuters, Free international from site ,
www.orcid.org
It is preferable to agree with the supervisor about
who will be the lead researcher of the study so as
not to get a subsequent misunderstanding
- When sending the study make sure the
requirements of the Journal and the design of tables
and data that are attached with the draft, as some
magazines need photos and others file Word and
then include the number of the International
researcher in the delivery form in order to easily
identify your identity as a researcher with the

4. similarity of the names of the researchers and help
determine the studies that are published for the
researcher in different journals .
- Waiting for the answer:
most journals use systems to follow up the
conversion of research and the researcher can know
each stage
There is no time to respond, but most magazines
take three to eight months.
And for each gay base there are magazines send the
study to two or more references and need to get all
the responses before sending the final response by
the editor if the response exceeds the reasonable
time (such as 4 months in the waiting phase
converted to reviewers, the researcher can send a
mail to inquire.
- When the response arrives:
whatever the result of the response, the experience
alone is an achievement that can be celebrated,
most of the responses are acceptance with
amendments or rejection and each case mentions

5. the reasons on which the decision was based and
observations that benefit the researcher to develop
the draft and the time required to send the draft
after amendments.
- After publication:
it is important that the researcher can continue to
build his research record and spread through
research communication platforms and follow up
the research of his colleagues and this helps him to
appear and market the study and its results
And notices in journals to know the research that is
spread in his field.
-The research impact factor culminates the
researcher's joy when the first notice arrives that
there is a quote from his study or cited in his study
and here begins the journey of building the
research impact factor of the researcher and rise to
academic fame