This document provides guidance for postgraduate students on publishing in high impact journals. It discusses the importance of publication and different publication types like journal papers and proceedings papers. It outlines key criteria for writing quality scholarly papers, including structure, language, and originality. The document also reviews the general peer review process, including common reviewer verdicts, perspectives of editors and reviewers, and steps to take if a paper is rejected. The goal is to help students successfully publish their work in high impact journals.
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Seminar given on 20 June, 2012 within the course: La comunicación intercultural euroasiática en las condiciones del proceso de Bolonia from the University of Granada
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Seminar given on 20 June, 2012 within the course: La comunicación intercultural euroasiática en las condiciones del proceso de Bolonia from the University of Granada
Digital strategies to find the right journal for publishing your researchSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 3, 2019
Speaker: Duncan Nicholas, Former Development Editor at international academic publisher Taylor and Francis Group, and now Director of DN Journals research publishing consultancy, and Senior Consultant for Enago Academy.
Overview: This webinar will provide an overview of digital tools and initiatives that help researchers select the right journal for their manuscript to ensure the best chance of article acceptance.
As a researcher, you are expected to start publishing early in your career. But original research could take years to complete! This does not mean you that you cannot publish a paper until you complete your research. You can disseminate your research in many other ways. These slides will help you learn more about the different types of scholarly literature so that you are able to choose the most suitable format for publishing your study.
Impact factor (using impact factor to assess the impact of a journal)shri mangalambikai
The impact factor (IF) is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is used to measure the importance or rank of a journal by calculating the times it's articles are cited.
Impact Factors are useful, but they should not be the only consideration when judging quality. Not all journals are tracked in the JCR database and, as a result, do not have impact factors. New journals must wait until they have a record of citations before even being considered for inclusion. The scientific worth of an individual article has nothing to do with the impact factor of a journal.
power point presentation covering all aspects of publishing research papers viz: why to publish a research paper , necessary steps before writing a research paper, parts of a research paper, process of publishing a research paper, identifying a target journal , preparing the manuscript etc.
I hope this power point presentation will be beneficial to all PhD students
The presentation discusses about a Thesis, Research paper, Review Article & Technical Reports: Organization of thesis and reports, formatting issues, citation methods, references, effective oral presentation of research. Quality indices of research publication: impact factor, immediacy factor, H- index and other citation indices. A verbal consent of Prof. Dr. C. B. Bhatt was obtained (at 4.15pm on Dt. 26-11-2016 at Hall A-2, GTU, Chandkheda) to float the presentation online in benefits of the research scholar society.
This includes:
1. Definition of abstract
2. Uses of importance of abstracts
3. Reasons for writing abstracts
4. Parts or sections of an abstract
5. Types of abstracts
6. Tips on how to write abstracts
7. Qualities of a good abstract
Publishing in high impact factor journals - Universiti Putra MalaysiaMohamed Alrshah
This workshop has been organized by the Network, Parallel and Distributed Computing Research Group at the Department of Communication Technology and Networks at Universiti Putra Malaysia. The audience was 40 people from academic staff, master and Ph.D. students from the department.
Digital strategies to find the right journal for publishing your researchSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 3, 2019
Speaker: Duncan Nicholas, Former Development Editor at international academic publisher Taylor and Francis Group, and now Director of DN Journals research publishing consultancy, and Senior Consultant for Enago Academy.
Overview: This webinar will provide an overview of digital tools and initiatives that help researchers select the right journal for their manuscript to ensure the best chance of article acceptance.
As a researcher, you are expected to start publishing early in your career. But original research could take years to complete! This does not mean you that you cannot publish a paper until you complete your research. You can disseminate your research in many other ways. These slides will help you learn more about the different types of scholarly literature so that you are able to choose the most suitable format for publishing your study.
Impact factor (using impact factor to assess the impact of a journal)shri mangalambikai
The impact factor (IF) is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is used to measure the importance or rank of a journal by calculating the times it's articles are cited.
Impact Factors are useful, but they should not be the only consideration when judging quality. Not all journals are tracked in the JCR database and, as a result, do not have impact factors. New journals must wait until they have a record of citations before even being considered for inclusion. The scientific worth of an individual article has nothing to do with the impact factor of a journal.
power point presentation covering all aspects of publishing research papers viz: why to publish a research paper , necessary steps before writing a research paper, parts of a research paper, process of publishing a research paper, identifying a target journal , preparing the manuscript etc.
I hope this power point presentation will be beneficial to all PhD students
The presentation discusses about a Thesis, Research paper, Review Article & Technical Reports: Organization of thesis and reports, formatting issues, citation methods, references, effective oral presentation of research. Quality indices of research publication: impact factor, immediacy factor, H- index and other citation indices. A verbal consent of Prof. Dr. C. B. Bhatt was obtained (at 4.15pm on Dt. 26-11-2016 at Hall A-2, GTU, Chandkheda) to float the presentation online in benefits of the research scholar society.
This includes:
1. Definition of abstract
2. Uses of importance of abstracts
3. Reasons for writing abstracts
4. Parts or sections of an abstract
5. Types of abstracts
6. Tips on how to write abstracts
7. Qualities of a good abstract
Publishing in high impact factor journals - Universiti Putra MalaysiaMohamed Alrshah
This workshop has been organized by the Network, Parallel and Distributed Computing Research Group at the Department of Communication Technology and Networks at Universiti Putra Malaysia. The audience was 40 people from academic staff, master and Ph.D. students from the department.
In this presentation, aimed at students in engineering, science and technology, I present some personal thoughts on what is expected in a technical report. Aimed particularly at students about to write their first lab report, it also contains useful information for students who need to write a dissertation or a software design document. It relects what I like to see in a report when I am marking it, but some of the principles are general I think. Within the constraints of the medium, I have also tried to present this it in much the same way that I would expect a report to be presented. Comments welcome.
So you want to write a technical paper!George Earle
This presentation takes you through the 6 KEY STEPS to writing a technical or white paper to accelerate your career and become known as an expert in your organization.
How to write a Scientific Manuscript – Pubrica.pptxPubrica
Writing a scientific manuscript is difficult for even the brightest minds, but it is highly satisfying once the project is completed. Researchers meticulously create manuscripts to share their original ideas and fresh discoveries with the scientific community and the general public.
Learn More : https://bit.ly/3ioFNT1
Reference: https://pubrica.com/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Helping sudents/professionals preparare a Thesis, Scientific Paper, improve Oral Presentation Skills for conference presentations, prepare a CV/Resume and Cover Letter
Writekraft Research & Publication LLP.
We are one of the leading PhD assistance company that deals in helping PhD scholars in their Thesis, Research paper writing and publication work. We are providing custom PhD Thesis written for you exactly the way you want along with a Turnitin plagiarism report.
For more Information Contact us@ admin@writekraft.com
Or Call us @ 7753818181, 9838033084
www.writekraft.com
Writekraft Research & Publication LLP.
We are one of the leading PhD assistance company that deals in helping PhD scholars in their Thesis, Research paper writing and publication work. We are providing custom PhD Thesis written for you exactly the way you want along with a Turnitin plagiarism report.
For more Information Contact us@ admin@writekraft.com
Or Call us @ 7753818181, 9838033084
www.writekraft.com
Writekraft Research & Publication LLP.
We are one of the leading PhD assistance company that deals in helping PhD scholars in their Thesis, Research paper writing and publication work. We are providing custom PhD Thesis written for you exactly the way you want along with a Turnitin plagiarism report.
For more Information Contact us@ admin@writekraft.com
Or Call us @ 7753818181, 9838033084
www.writekraft.com
Similar to Publishing in high impact factor journals (20)
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
1. Publishing in high impact journals
For postgraduate students
By:
Dr. Mohamed A. Alrshah,
Ph.D. in Computer Science,
Dept. of Communication Technology and Networks.
Mohamed.asnd@gmail.com
3. OutlinesPart 1
1. Background About Publication
1.1 What is a scholarly journal?
1.2 Aims of publication
1.3 Publication types
1.3.1 Journal papers
1.3.2 Proceedings papers
1.4 Why we publish in high impact journal?
4. Facts:
Before we start, you must know that:
1. Your research is worthless unless it is published.
2. The value of an article increases when it is being
cited in other research articles.
3. The publication is the knowledge sharing.
4. You “publish or perish”.
5. What is a scholarly journal?
At first, watch this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6WVJEXJj_o
6. Aims of Publication
Aims of publication are including:
To build the author’s record (CV & reputation) of research contributions in form of papers.
To guarantee intellectual property of scientific contributions in academia and industry.
To encourage scientists to share knowledge that they might otherwise have kept secret.
To create a sense of competition among scientists to be the first to publish a new scientific
finding.
To have other researchers do further research based on the published paper.
To participate in advancing knowledge.
7. Publication Types
At first watch these:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EHT8szRNvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEsAKqXSfbY
Journal papers
Proceeding papers (Conferences, Workshops, Colloquiums, and so on.)
Magazine papers
Letters
Patents
Standards & RFCs
Theses
Chapter in a book
Books
and so on.
8. Attention:
Our focus here will be on the most beneficial
publication types for graduate students to
fulfil the graduation requirements in their
research journeys (journal and conference
papers).
9. Journal papers
Allow researchers to communicate their researches with their peers.
Provide a great opportunity to get professional comments about your work.
Usually contain the contribution(s) made by the researcher(s).
Should provide complete information about a particular piece of research.
High impact journals mostly apply the peer-reviewing process.
Publishing a journal paper is a time-intensive process.
To deliver your research to the world faster, try publishing at a conference!
10. Proceedings papers
Academic articles published based on academic events such as conferences, workshops,
colloquiums, and so on.
Provide a great opportunity to meet with professional researchers in your area.
Usually contain the contribution(s) made by researcher(s) and presented at an event.
A written record of a research to be presented to fellow researchers.
In some fields, proceedings papers may be considered gray literature.
Published faster than Journal papers.
Many proceedings publications are peer-reviewed.
11. Why we publish in high impact journal?
ISI, Q1, IF=2.937
IEEE conference
IEEE conference
13. OutlinesPart 2
2. Types of Papers (in general)
2.1 The common types of Papers
2.2 General structure of research articles
2.3 Original papers (full papers)
2.3.1 Structure of original papers
2.3.2 Letters and communications (short papers)
2.4 Review or Survey Papers
2.4.1 Structure of review papers (a sample)
2.5 Design papers
2.6 White papers
14. The common types of Papers
Original papers (full papers)
Letters (short papers)
Review or Survey Papers
Design papers
White papers
Revisited paper
Book Review
And many more.
15. General structure of research articles
I Introduction
M Methodology
R Results
A and
D Discussion
16. Original papers (full papers)
Original papers can be published either in journals or in conferences.
Original research articles must present:
Detailed studies reporting original research.
Satisfactory level of novelty.
The primary literature of the original contribution.
Critical discussion of related works.
Detailed explanation of the proposed work(s) using textual and graphical tools.
Deep discussion and interpretation of the results from all aspects.
Discussion of possible implications (impact and future directions).
Limitations, if any.
17. Structure of original papers
Title Make these components as easy as you can.
Abstract They must be informative, attractive, and effective.
Keywords Must be helpful for indexing and searching.
----------------------------
Introduction Paper space is not boundless and reader's time is limited.
Related works The work must be clear (nothing is hidden), correct, complete,
Proposed work(s) precise, concise, straightforward and reproducible.
Results and discussion Must use simple language.
----------------------------
Conclusion Must be brief and comprehensive (avoid repeating sentences).
Acknowledgement Funding information and thanks for people who helped in this work.
References Must be applicable, accessible, proper and sufficient.
Supplementary material If any (optional).
18. Letters and communications (short papers)
A letter is shorter than a scholarly article.
It mostly presents an original and important contribution.
It does not present a full explanation of research the way a scholarly article does.
It is usually an explanation of work that has been done, either a design or research, without all
the data presented.
You would write a letter if you just wanted to summarize your work in a brief document
without presenting all your research.
Letters are often used to get the word out quickly about research, and then followed up by
complete journal articles.
Many journals are dedicated to letters alone, for example:
IEEE Computer Architecture Letters.
Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis.
19. Review or Survey Papers
Review articles give an overview of existing literature in a field.
These identify specific problems or issues and analyse information from available published
works on the topic with a neutral perspective.
These are considered as secondary literature and can be a particularly efficient way for
early career researchers to begin publishing.
Review articles can be of three types, broadly speaking:
1. literature reviews. 2. systematic reviews. 3. meta-analyses.
The references used in a review article are helpful as they lead to more in-depth research.
You may write a review article to summarize the progress in a field you've been working on.
Review articles are usually long and their lengths are depending on the journal.
Some journals publish short reviews, while some journals are dedicated entirely to review
articles.
20. Structure of review papers (a sample)
Title Make these components as easy as you can.
Abstract They must be informative, attractive, and effective.
Keywords Must be helpful for indexing and searching.
----------------------------
Introduction Must be clear, concise and sufficient.
Literature review Must cover new studies (in some fields) & must be comprehensive.
Proposed taxonomy(s) May present new taxonomies or classifications of existing solutions.
Deep discussion Must present the research gap and the future directions.
----------------------------
Conclusion Must be brief and comprehensive (avoid repeating sentences).
Acknowledgement Funding information and thanks for people who helped in this work.
References Must be applicable, accessible, proper and sufficient.
Supplementary material If any (optional).
21. Design papers
A design paper is a detailed description of a design that you plan to make or you
have already made.
It consists of an overview of what others have done and where your design fits in, a
plan, and an explanation of technical requirements and solutions.
White papers
A white paper is a document that falls somewhere between a brochure and a
manual.
You can write a white paper if you want to provide a general, technical explanation
of an architecture, framework or product technology.
Companies provide white papers to help users and researchers understand and use
their products.
23. OutlinesPart 3
3. Writing Quality Papers
3.1 Important criteria for writing scholarly papers
3.2 Choosing the proper editing tool
3.3 Choosing the proper drawing tool
3.4 Choosing the proper reference management tool
3.5 Checking the similarity
3.6 Editing and proofreading
3.7 How to write it?
24. Important criteria for writing scholarly papers
In order to write a high quality scientific paper, you must consider the
following points:
1. The Formatting (word count, no of figures, no of tables, referencing)
2. The Language
3. The Structure
4. The Clarity
5. The Coherence
6. The Completeness
7. The Originality and Novelty
8. The Significance
9. The Plagiarism
25. Choosing the proper editing tool
Microsoft Word produces good quality documents.
Libre Office is a free and open-source.
However, Latex produces very high-quality documents.
Changing an article format is easier with Latex (in case of changing journal).
The best tool is the one compatible with the template of the targeted journal.
26. Choosing the proper drawing tool
Pixel-based graphs are ok if they are kept with the original ratio.
jpg, png and so on.
Victor-based graphs (eps, epf) are very high quality.
eps usually used with Latex (not supported in Microsoft Word).
epf usually used with Microsoft Word.
Microsoft Visio is a good tool that produces a high-quality diagrams.
Libre draw is a free tool that produces a high-quality diagrams.
There are many tools such as:
1. Draw.io Diagrams. 2. Lucidchart. 3. Cacoo Diagram Maker.
27. Choose the proper reference management tool
Endnotes is a excellent tool, but it is not free.
Mendeley, Zotero, Qiqqa and Bibtex are excellent and free tools.
If you have Arabic references, better choose Zotero or Qiqqa.
If you use Latex, you have to use Bibtex.
28. Checking the similarity
To avoid plagiarism, produce the similarity report.
There are a lot of tools to check similarity.
However, the journals’ editors mostly use Turnitin.
Don’t play with the filter’s settings to reduce similarity.
Paraphrase the similar parts and re-check with Turnitin.
29. Editing and proofreading
Make sure that:
The language used in your manuscript is up to the professional level.
The structure of your manuscript is proper and correct.
The flow of ideas is correct.
Make sure that your manuscript is consistent.
Check consistency of names.
Check the abbreviations.
If you can’t do all of these yourself, look for editing and proofreading services that are:
Professional.
Official.
See https://www.elsevier.com/authors/author-services
30. How to write it?
State question(s) or problem(s), aim(s), objectives, hypotheses, and contributions clearly.
Review (don’t just list!) relevant literature and derive meaningful research questions and/or problems
from it appropriately.
Discuss your methodology, paying attention to its validity and reliability of methods and data.
Show your analysis giving as much detail as possible so reviewer can follow every stage.
Discuss findings with reference to the aim(s), objectives and questions/problems.
Conclude your findings and identify the limitations and opportunities for further study.
31. How to write it?
How to write the Introduction section?
Explain the background and context:
Make it simple and clear.
Directly, drive the reader to the problem, motivation and significance of the work.
Don't make it an extensive essay.
Define aim(s) and objectives of the paper:
Be specific.
The wider study is probably not that relevant (Hardly acceptable).
Avoid referencing to any PhD and MSc theses.
The research should stand (or fall) on its own merits under peer review.
Explain structure of the paper
Example: The upcoming section presents the literature review and Section 3 exhibits the methodology.
32. How to write it?
How to write the Literature Review section?
This is not a list, it’s a critique.
Develop your arguments, bringing in relevant citations as examples of who supports or conflicts with
that argument.
Write in sentences and paragraphs, where:
Each paragraph discusses a single theme or central idea. One or more sentences.
Each sentence makes sense on its own.
Reference the key authors, stick to examples from the best journals, use examples from your target
journal.
Focus on the new literature.
All references must be accessible.
33. How to write it?
How to write the Methodology/analysis section?
Can the reader follow your complete method from start to finish?
Is there a questionnaire? Have you appendixed it?
Are steps missing? Can you refer the reader to another source if not the present paper?
Are all formulae and values accurately reported?
Nothing frustrates reviewers like being unable to follow the logic because the paper is incomplete.
34. How to write it?
How to write the Discussion/Conclusions section?
Tie discussion back to themes from literature review so the paper has consistency.
Link conclusions to objectives (complete the circle).
Identify any limitations, make recommendations for future research.
Discuss any implications or impacts for theory/practice.
35. Want to fast-track the process?
Look for a special issue (fast-tracked reviews).
Look for a conference with a special issue attached.
Look for Rapid Publication Journals.
Specify preferred reviewers (sometimes an option).
37. OutlinesPart 4
4. The general review process
4.1 The Review life cycle: behind the scene
4.2 The possible verdicts
4.3 If your paper was rejected - WHAT NEXT?
4.4 From the Editor-in-chief perspective
4.5 Eight reasons EIC rejected your article
4.6 From the reviewer's perspective
4.7 Being a good reviewer.
38. The Review life cycle: behind the scene
Blind review? or Not?
Paid reviewers? or Voluntary peer-reviewers?
39. The possible verdicts
Out of scope (before/after review).
Reject (before/after review).
Reject – Resubmission is NOT recommended.
Reject – Resubmission after amendment is recommended.
Minor correction (conditional acceptance).
be careful both may lead to rejection!
Major correction (conditional acceptance).
Accept.
40. If your paper was rejected - WHAT NEXT?
Appeal the rejection.
Appealing a rejection is within your rights as an author.
Base your appeal on logic and not emotion.
Outline your points to the editor without belittling the reviewers or being argumentative.
Appeals based on the scope of the journal are unlikely to succeed.
Resubmit to the same journal.
The journal may reject your initial offering but invite you to resubmit later after addressing the reviewers’ concerns.
Remember, if a journal informed you that they are not interested in accepting any future versions of the manuscript, you
should respect their decision and try a different journal.
Make changes and submit to a different journal.
Consider the given comments and improve the manuscript.
Don’t forget to change the format of the manuscript and to modify the cover letter.
Make no changes and submit to another journal.
Not a good idea since your manuscript may be reviewed by some of the same reviewers at the new journal.
File the manuscript away and never resubmit it.
Not a good idea at all, however, you can post your work to figshare or Dryad, where it will be citable and freely accessible.
41. From the Editor-in-chief’s perspective
“When a manuscript is submitted to a high-quality journal, it goes through
intense scrutiny — even before it's seen by the editor-in-chief and
selected for peer review. At Elsevier, between 30% to 50% of
articles don't even make it to the peer review process.”
As Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the international journal of the American
Carbon Society, Dr. Peter Thrower experiences this situation first-hand. His
advice to authors:
“By avoiding these pitfalls, you will save reviewers, editors and staff time
and frustration, and ensure that your work is judged by its scientific merit,
not mistakes.”
42. Eight reasons EIC rejected your article
By Dr. Peter Thrower, the Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the Elsevier journal.
1. It fails the technical screening. Before they even go to the editor-in-chief, articles are checked for
technical elements. The main reasons they are rejected are:
The article contains elements that are suspected to be plagiarized, or it is currently under review at
another journal. (Republishing articles or parts of articles, submitting to one or more journals at the same
time or using text or images without permission is not allowed. See Elsevier ethical guidelines.)
The manuscript is not complete; it may be lacking key elements such as the title, authors, affiliations,
keywords, main text, references and all tables and figures).
The English is not sufficient for the peer review process.
The figures are not complete or are not clear enough to read.
The article does not conform to the Guide for Authors for the journal it is submitted to.
References are incomplete or very old.
2. It's incomprehensible.
The language, structure, or figures are so poor that it can't be assessed.
43. 3. It does not fall within the Aims and Scope.
For the journal Carbon, the material studied may contain carbon, but is not carbon.
The study uses a carbon material but the focus is on something different.
There is no new carbon science.
4. It's incomplete.
The article contains observations but is not a full study.
It discusses findings in relation to some of the work in the field but ignores other important work.
5. The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective or deficient.
The study lacked clear comparison metrics.
The study uses procedures or methodology that cannot be repeated.
The analysis is not statistically valid or does not follow the norms of the field.
Eight reasons EIC rejected your article
By Dr. Peter Thrower, the Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the Elsevier journal.
44. 6. The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.
The arguments are illogical, unstructured or invalid.
The data does not support the conclusions.
The conclusions ignore large portions of the literature.
7. It's is simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.
Findings are incremental and do not advance the field.
The work is clearly part of a larger study, chopped up to make as many articles as possible.
8. It's boring.
It is archival, incremental or of marginal interest to the field (see point 7).
The question behind the work is not of interest in the field.
The work is not of interest to the readers of the specific journals.
Eight reasons EIC rejected your article
By Dr. Peter Thrower, the Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the Elsevier journal.
45. From the reviewer’s perspective
Mostly, the reviewers want to check your manuscript based on the following
criteria:
Is the manuscript presented in an obvious fashion and written in standard
English?
Is the methodology correct?
Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the
conclusions?
Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript
fully available?
Is the work repeatable or reproducible?
Are the references up-to-date and sufficient?
Are the metrics proper and sufficient?
46. Being a good reviewer
If you want to be published, you accept the responsibility to also undertake reviews to help others get
published.
If you want to be part of the academic community, you have a duty to that community.
Reviews should be completed in a timeous way.
Reviewers should ALWAYS explain the basis of your decision.
Reviewers should NEVER be self-serving.
Reviewers should be balanced (bring out the good and bad aspects of the paper).
Remember you are also subject to this process “treat others as you want them to treat you”
48. OutlinesPart 5
5. Choosing The Appropriate Journal
5.1 Important criteria for selection
5.1.1 Based on accessibility
5.1.2 Based on disciplinary
5.1.3 Based on indexing
5.1.4 Based on review speed
5.2 Journal selection tools
5.3 Check the validity of candidate journals
5.4 Check recent papers published in the selected journal
49. Important criteria for selection
Based on disciplinary
Multidisciplinary journals.
Interdisciplinary journals.
Specialized journals
Based on accessibility
Open access journals
Subscription-based journals
Based on indexing
Scopus journals
ISI master journals
ISI journals
Based on the review speed
Rapid publication journals.
Traditional journals
50. Journal selection tools
Elsevier Journal Finder http://journalfinder.elsevier.com/
Springer Journal Suggester https://journalsuggester.springer.com/
IEEE Publication Recommender http://publication-recommender.ieee.org/home
EndNote Online Matcher https://projectne.thomsonreuters.com/#/login?app=endnote
Edanz Journal Selector https://www.edanzediting.com/journal-selector
SciRev Journal Finder https://scirev.sc/
Find My Journal https://findmyjournal.com/
Cofactor Journal Selector http://cofactorscience.com/journal-selector
JS Journal Selector https://journalselector.com/
Journal Guide https://www.journalguide.com/
Wiley Find Journal https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/find-a-journal/index.html
Journal Article Name Estimator (Jane) http://jane.biosemantics.org/
PubMed PubReminder http://hgserver2.amc.nl/cgi-bin/miner/miner2.cgi
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) https://doaj.org/
HOWEVER, it would be better if you, first, search in your references (WHERE HAVE THE SIMILAR WORKS BEEN PUBLISHED?)
51. Check the validity of candidate journals
In order to check the validity of the candidate journals information, use the well-known
indexes:
ISI - Web of Science https://incites.thomsonreuters.com/#/signin
ISI - Master Journals List http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/
Scopus https://journalmetrics.scopus.com/
Scimagojr http://www.scimagojr.com/
Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com.my/
52. Check recent papers published in the selected journal
Go to the website of the candidate journal.
Read the scope of the journal carefully.
Download a set of papers related to your topic.
Check the submission, revision and acceptance dates.
If you decided to submit to the selected journal:
Download the journal’s template.
Re-format your manuscript based on the template.
54. OutlinesPart 6
6. Submitting Your Manuscript
6.1 Preparing a good cover letter
6.2 Preparing a list of suggested reviewers (if required)
6.3 Preparing a list of conflicted reviewers (if any)
6.4 Preparing the authors' biography
6.5 Creating your researcher identity
6.6 Creating an account on the editorial-system of the journal
6.7 Dealing with reviewers' comments
55. Preparing a good cover letter
Dear Prof. Dr. Vincenzo Piuri
Editor-in-chief of IEEE Systems Journal
On behalf of our research group members at the Department of Communication Technology and Network, Universiti
Putra Malaysia, I would like to thank you for your effort and cooperation for the success of publishing a high-quality
research in a professional manner.
I declare that this paper entitled "Elastic-TCP: Flexible Congestion Control Algorithm for High-BDP Networks" has not
been published previously and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
In this paper, we presented a new congestion control algorithm, called Elastic-TCP, which is geared to work on high-
BDP networks. Based on extensive simulation and testbed experiments, we found that the proposed Algorithm could
overcome the compared algorithms, which are CUBIC (the default of Linux), C-TCP (the default of MS Windows), and
TCP-BBR (the latest algorithm proposed by Google team).
We think that the readership of your journal would be interested in this article since it provides a new approach to
congestion control over high-speed and long-distance networks, where the proposed algorithm improves the
performance of data communications up to 50%, in many cases.
Thank you so much.
Sincerely,
Mohamed A. Alrshah, Ph.D,
Department of Communication Technology and Network,
Universiti Putra Malaysia.
To whom
Introduction
Declaration
Summary of the paper
The significance
Interest of the readership
Thanks
Your name and affiliation
56. Preparing a list of suggested reviewers (if required)
Dear Editor-in-Chief
For this submission, we respectfully suggest the following
reviewers:
1. Carlo Caini, Professor of telecommunications,
University of Bologna. carlo.caini@unibo.it
2. Sándor Molnár, Associate Professor of
telecommunications, Budapest University of
Technology. molnar@tmit.bme.hu
3. Chris Blondia, Professor of mathematics and computer
science, University of Antwerp.
chris.blondia@uantwerpen.be
Your cooperation is highly appreciated.
Thank you so much.
57. Preparing a list of conflicted reviewers (if any)
Dear Editor-in-Chief
For this submission, we respectfully would like to inform you
that we have some conflict of interest with the following
respectful names:
1. Xyz1 Xyz1, Professor of telecommunications, University
of Xyz1. xyz1@xyz.com
2. Xyz2 Xyz2, Associate Professor of telecommunications,
Xyz2 University of Technology. xyz2@xyz.com
Thus, we would be very grateful if these names are avoided.
Your cooperation is highly appreciated.
Thank you so much.
58. Preparing the authors' biography
Author Biographies:
1- Mohamed A. Alrshah: (M’13, ) received his BSc degree in Computer Science from
Naser University - Libya, in 2000, and his MSc degree in computer networks in May
2009 and his Ph.D. in communication technology and networks in Feb 2017 from
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Currently, he is a senior lecturer at Al-Asmarya University at
the Faculty of Information Technology, Zliten, Libya. He has published a number of
articles in high impact factor scientific journals. His research interests are in the field
of high-speed TCP protocols, high-speed network, parallel and distributed algorithms,
software defined networking, network design and management, wireless networks.
2- Mohamed A. Al-Moqri: received his BSc degree in Computer Science from
Almustanseriah University, Iraq, in 2000, and his MSc degree in computer networks in
2009 and his Ph.D. in communication technology and networks in 2016 from
Universiti Putra Malaysia. He has published a number of articles in high impact factor
scientific journals. His research interests are in the field of high-speed TCP protocols,
high-speed network, QoS, scheduling algorithms, admission control and wireless
networks.
3- Mohamed Othman: (M’04) received his PhD from the Universiti Kebangsaan
Malaysia with distinction (Best PhD Thesis in 2000 awarded by Sime Darby Malaysia
and Malaysian Mathematical Science Society). Now, he is a Professor in the Faculty of
Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). He is
also an associate researcher at the Lab of Computational Science and Mathematical
Physics, Institute of Mathematical Research (INSPEM), UPM. He published more than
160 International journals and 230 proceeding papers. His main research interests are
in the fields of high speed network, parallel and distributed algorithms, software
defined networking, network design and management, wireless network (MPDU- and
MSDU-Frame aggregation, TCP Performance, MAC layer, resource management, and
traffic monitoring) and scientific telegraph equation and modelling.
It must include:
The name.
Membership (optional).
Current academic position (optional).
The academic Qualifications with dates and
universities.
The important academic achievements.
The research interests.
59. Creating your researcher identity
Use one or more of the internationally recognized platforms:
ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) orcid.org/
Google Citations scholar.google.com.my/citations?hl=en
Scopus Author. www.scopus.com/
ResearcherID www.researcherid.com/
60. Creating an account on the editorial-system of the journal
Every journal has its own system
Some journals rely on the user account created through the publisher.
Some journal’s systems are independent from the publisher system.
Connect your account at the journal to your researcher identity (when possible).
Use your correct email, phone and address.
Remember your account username and password.
Put your name as a corresponding author, OTHERWISE, !!!???
61. Dealing with reviewers' comments (sample)
Respect the opinions of reviewers, even if they are wrong you answer politely.
You should fulfil what have been requested by the reviewers, otherwise, you reply by a
polite reasonable explanation.
Even if they asked you stupid or silly questions, you should find why they have done!
Some comments implicitly tell you that your writing is NOT CLEAR.
Don’t mix up the comments (leave it based on the reviewer).
Even if two reviewers gave you the same comment, you must answer them separately.
Highlight your corrections in the manuscript.
Attach a report including a table of corrections with four columns (comment #, comment,
your response, position in manuscript).
Don’t modify the comments.
Don’t add any unrequested material, that may leads to another review round.
62. Selected Resources
http://www.editage.com
http://www.aje.com
http://libguides.mit.edu/citing, Citing sources: Overview.
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/8-reasons-i-rejected-your-article
http://www.massey.ac.nz/, From research to publishing in high impact journals.
https://www.trident.edu/, Student Guide to Writing a High-Quality Academic Paper.