Training materials used with doctoral students faced with the challenge of writing up their research and asking themselves 'How do I write up my doctoral study?'
The author's purpose is the main reason that he/she has for writing the selection.
Point of view is the author's opinion about the subject. The author's purpose and point of view go together. The author wants you to see the topic from his/her point of view.
When you are able to recognize the author's purpose, you will have a better understanding of the selection.
Kinds of Author's Purpose
If the author's purpose is to inform, you will learn something from the selection (facts, details/instructions, places, events and people.
If the author's purpose is to persuade, that means they want you to believe their position. Persuasive pieces are usually non-fiction.
If the author's purpose is to entertain, one goal may be to tell a story or to describe characters, places or events.
Compare the ways in which (at least) three writers use juxtaposition to convey their intended message.
By Dense Law, Hou Hiu Wan, Jane Wong, Natalie Pang
The author's purpose is the main reason that he/she has for writing the selection.
Point of view is the author's opinion about the subject. The author's purpose and point of view go together. The author wants you to see the topic from his/her point of view.
When you are able to recognize the author's purpose, you will have a better understanding of the selection.
Kinds of Author's Purpose
If the author's purpose is to inform, you will learn something from the selection (facts, details/instructions, places, events and people.
If the author's purpose is to persuade, that means they want you to believe their position. Persuasive pieces are usually non-fiction.
If the author's purpose is to entertain, one goal may be to tell a story or to describe characters, places or events.
Compare the ways in which (at least) three writers use juxtaposition to convey their intended message.
By Dense Law, Hou Hiu Wan, Jane Wong, Natalie Pang
I created this presentation to go along with a text book I use in my class.
McWhorter, Kathleen T. Reflections: Patterns for Reading and Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2013. Print.
Understanding text structures is an important reading skill because it aids comprehension of informational texts. Get middle school students started the process of understanding and analyzing Text Structures and Organizations with this engaging PowerPoint presentation. Presentation addresses the five most common structures: : description, chronological, cause/effect, compare/contrast, and problem/solution. Examples and teacher instructions are included. Aligned to Common Core ELA-Literacy Standards: RI.6.1, 7.1, 8.1; 5.11C; 6.10C; 7.10C; 8.10C.
This sort is a great activity for middle and high school students to use after learning elements of fiction genres and subgenres. See correlating presentation on www.literacystationinspiration.com.
These tips will help you make an important transition:
away from writing poetry to celebrate, commemorate, or capture your own feelings (in which case you, the poet, are the center of the poem’s universe)
towards writing poetry in order to generate feelings in your reader (in which case the poem exists entirely to serve the reader).
Collaboration and networking: learning from DREaM and RIVALHazel Hall
Discusses the extent of networking and collaboration amongst library and information science researchers and practitioners who took part in the AHRC-funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project in 2011/12, and the extent to which learning from this grant has influenced the delivery of the Royal Society of Edinburgh funded Research Impact and Value and Library and Information Science project in 2019/20.
I created this presentation to go along with a text book I use in my class.
McWhorter, Kathleen T. Reflections: Patterns for Reading and Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2013. Print.
Understanding text structures is an important reading skill because it aids comprehension of informational texts. Get middle school students started the process of understanding and analyzing Text Structures and Organizations with this engaging PowerPoint presentation. Presentation addresses the five most common structures: : description, chronological, cause/effect, compare/contrast, and problem/solution. Examples and teacher instructions are included. Aligned to Common Core ELA-Literacy Standards: RI.6.1, 7.1, 8.1; 5.11C; 6.10C; 7.10C; 8.10C.
This sort is a great activity for middle and high school students to use after learning elements of fiction genres and subgenres. See correlating presentation on www.literacystationinspiration.com.
These tips will help you make an important transition:
away from writing poetry to celebrate, commemorate, or capture your own feelings (in which case you, the poet, are the center of the poem’s universe)
towards writing poetry in order to generate feelings in your reader (in which case the poem exists entirely to serve the reader).
Collaboration and networking: learning from DREaM and RIVALHazel Hall
Discusses the extent of networking and collaboration amongst library and information science researchers and practitioners who took part in the AHRC-funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project in 2011/12, and the extent to which learning from this grant has influenced the delivery of the Royal Society of Edinburgh funded Research Impact and Value and Library and Information Science project in 2019/20.
Conducting Research: Literature Search to Writing Review Paper, Part 1: Syste...Nader Ale Ebrahim
“Research Tools” can be defined as vehicles that broadly facilitate research and related activities. “Research Tools” enable researchers to collect, organize, analyze, visualize and publicized research outputs. Dr. Nader has collected over 700 tools that enable students to follow the correct path in research and to ultimately produce high-quality research outputs with more accuracy and efficiency. It is assembled as an interactive Web-based mind map, titled “Research Tools”, which is updated periodically. “Research Tools” consists of a hierarchical set of nodes. It has four main nodes: (1) Searching the literature, (2) Writing a paper, (3) Targeting suitable journals, and (4) Enhancing visibility and impact of the research. In this workshop some tools as an example from the part 1 (Searching the literature) will be described. The e-skills learned from the workshop are useful across various research disciplines and research institutions.
Chapter 2 ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGYHazrina Haja
Guide to development of academic writing; chapter 2 (literature review) and abstract writing as well as referencing system. Focus area: architecture but not limited to.Research Methodology Class BAGS6106 in University of Malaya, Malaysia. Feb 2019
Dr Stephen j Hall 2016 Educated in Deep Doctorate Land Stephen j Hall
A personal narrative of the theory and practice of a research Doctorate. Presented at UTIM, Research Colloquium Shah Alam Malaysia Nov 1 2016.
A practical practitioners experience of the "Nuts and Bolts' of Doctoral study.
How do you write a master's thesis? Prof. Laura Black guides students from the Master of Advanced Studies in Humanitarian Logistics and Management through the process.
The Experience of Writing the Comprehensive ExaminationChe-Wei Lee
This presentation was presented at the Research Apprenticeship Course Meeting for Dr. Jacob’s Doctoral Students
Wednesday, 8 October 2014, 2:30 – 3:30 p.m. (EDT)
Room 4321 Wesley W. Posvar Hall
University of Pittsburgh
Presentation delivered by Professor Hazel Hall at the RIVAL Reunion event in Edinburgh, 25th May 2023. Further details of the event at https://blogs.napier.ac.uk/social-informatics/2023/05/rival-reunion-event-25-may-2023/
Platform to Platform project lightening talkHazel Hall
Lightning talk on the AHRC/Creative Informatics funded Platform to Platform project to create a podcast series based on Lorna Lloyd's 'Diary of the war', and assess audience engagement with archives in two different digital formats - (1) a Blipfoto journal of text and images, and (2) sound in podcast episodes.
Platform to Platform: initial findings from the empirical studyHazel Hall
Initial findings from the empirical study of the Platform to Platform project are presented. The research centred on the creation of a podcast series based on the war diary of Lorna Lloyd (available at https://rss.com/podcasts/lornalloyd/), and the evaluation of audience engagement with it as compared with engagement with online text and images in a Blipfoto journal at http://blipfoto.com/lornal. The research was funded by the AHRC through the Creative Informatics programme.
Digital options: an assessment of audience engagement with a digitised set of...Hazel Hall
Paper presented at the Archives and Records Management conference, 2nd September 2022 on audience engagement with Lorna Lloyd's Diary of the war as a Blipfoto journal, and as a podcast series.
Using a multi-location, longitudinal focus group method to conduct qualitativ...Hazel Hall
Paper presented at 13th Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries International Conference (QQML2021) (virtual conference), 25-28 May 2021. Full text available at https://www.napier.ac.uk/~/media/worktribe/output-2755729/using-a-multi-location-longitudinal-focus-group-method-to-conduct-qualitative-research.pdf
Research, impact, value and library and information science (RIVAL): developm...Hazel Hall
The research-practice gap in Library and Information Science (LIS) is well documented, especially in respect of the difficulties of translating research into practice, and resultant lost opportunities. While many researchers attempt to explain this research-practice gap, few suggest strategies to address it. The creation of researcher-practitioner networks, however, is one approach that has been proved empirically to bridge the distance between the two communities. Such a network is currently operating in Scotland, funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Research, Impact, Value and Library and Information Science (RIVAL) is part-way through its implementation based around four knowledge exchange events for a network membership of 32 from a wide variety of LIS sectors. RIVAL’s successful delivery depends in part on the project leads’ experience of undertaking, and evaluating the impact of, a UK Arts and Humanities Research Council funded grant: the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project. Already there are indications that RIVAL is delivering value to network members. There is a strong expectation for this to be enhanced, both in the remainder of the funding period and beyond, offering theoretical contributions to the study of social networks, especially in respect of social capital development to support knowledge exchange.
Research into Practice case study 2: Library linked data implementations an...Hazel Hall
The research underlying this presentation explored the role that libraries play in the linked data context. Focusing on European national libraries and Scottish libraries, multiple data gathering methods and constant comparative analysis were applied in the study. Amongst the findings, a general lack of awareness within the library community of the Semantic Web and the implications of linked data was identified. At the same time, there is recognition that linked data augments the discoverability and enhances the interoperability of library data. The presentation will include recommendations for the application of the findings of this research in practice.
Catalysing research into practice from the ground upHazel Hall
David Stewart, CILIP President for 2019 and Regional Director of Health Library and Knowledge Services North, presents on his key presidential theme: the importance of evidence to underpin the difference that library services make. He provides an overview of CILIP’s plans for greater collaboration and co-ordination, and also shares details of work undertaken in NHS England. This includes (a) national research on return on investment, and (b) details of the Catalyst scheme in the North of England, which has been designed to develop librarian research capability and a ground-up, small-scale research programme.
Professor Hazel Hall introduces the second networking event of RIVAL - a collaborative network of Scotland-based Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers and practising library and information professionals interested in maximising the impact and value of library and information science research. The project, which runs in 2019 and 2020, is funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh.
Research, Impact, Value and LIS = RIVAL.
Scotland's school library strategy: advocacy and impact by Martina McChrystalHazel Hall
Vibrant libraries, thriving schools: a national strategy for school libraries in Scotland 2018-2023 is Scotland’s school library strategy. By showcasing the impact an excellent school library service can deliver, the strategy is intended to be used to influence decision-making in respect of school library provision. Martina's presentation outlines about her involvement in the development of the strategy as Chair of the National School Library Strategy Advisory Group, the strategy’s role in advocacy, and its anticipated impact.
Getting research into action: issues, challenges, solutions by Dr Sarah MortonHazel Hall
Sarah Morton has worked across research, policy and practice for most of her career, and will draw on examples from different settings encountered over this time in her presentation. She is keen to interrogate our learning about effective evidence use from the last 20 years, and review how this can be supported from research and practice perspectives. She will present a vision for the effective use of evidence of all kinds to plan, develop and improve policy, practice, and services. As part of this she will explain some of the ways that she is currently developing tools and support for effective evidence use.
Professor Hazel Hall introduces RIVAL - a collaborative network of Scotland-based Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers and practising library and information professionals interested in maximising the impact and value of library and information science research. The project, which runs in 2019 and 2020, is funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh. This is the first of the four networking events.
Research, Impact, Value and LIS = RIVAL.
Participatory Budgeting, São Paulo, BrazilHazel Hall
Summarises a research project on participatory budgeting in São Paulo, Brazil undertaken by Edinburgh Napier University researchers Dr Wegene Demeke and Dr Bruce Ryan, and supported by the Global Challenge Research Fund.
Research Impact Value and LIS, Edinburgh 11th July 2018: speaker slidesHazel Hall
Slides presented at #lis_rival, Edinburgh, 11th July 2018 by Hazel Hall, Paul Gooding, Yvonne Morris, Andrew McTaggart, Sara Wingate Gray, Leo Appleton and Alison Brettle
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
1. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Preparation of the PhD thesis for examination
Professor Hazel Hall
2. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
The target
3. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
In this account of the doctoral study the
candidate has convinced me that a novel and
original contribution to knowledge, that is
significant (i.e. will exert influence on the
academic field and/or practice), has been
derived from a robust analysis conducted by
someone who has a thorough understanding of
research design and implementation.
4. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
In this account of the doctoral study the
candidate has convinced me that a novel and
original contribution to knowledge, that is
significant (i.e. will exert influence on the
academic field and/or practice), has been
derived from a robust analysis conducted by
someone who has a thorough understanding of
research design and implementation.
• Emphasised in the
Abstract, Introduction,
and Conclusion
• Prefaced in the
Literature Review – gap
in literature
• Prefaced in RQs
• ‘Punchline’ of Discussion
with reference to
Literature Review
content
5. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
In this account of the doctoral study the
candidate has convinced me that a novel and
original contribution to knowledge, that is
significant (i.e. will exert influence on the
academic field and/or practice), has been
derived from a robust analysis conducted by
someone who has a thorough understanding of
research design and implementation.
• Value emphasised in the
Abstract, Introduction,
and Conclusion
• Evidence provided in
appended outputs
published or presented
over the course of
registration
6. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
In this account of the doctoral study the
candidate has convinced me that a novel and
original contribution to knowledge, that is
significant (i.e. will exert influence on the
academic field and/or practice), has been
derived from a robust analysis conducted by
someone who has a thorough understanding of
research design and implementation.
• The analysis of methods
and procedures
demonstrates that
research was completed
in an appropriate way –
approach justified and
contextualised with
reference to research
philosophy
• The account of ‘tools’
deployed to answer
research questions is clear
7. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Assessment
8. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Assessor provides
300 word report, plus answers to the following questions:
• Does the thesis represent an original contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent a significant contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent an independent contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent an appropriate understanding of research
methods?
• Is the presentation of the thesis satisfactory?
• Does the thesis demonstrate an appropriate understanding of the
literature?
• Is the abstract satisfactory?
Yes
To some extent
Not entirely
No
9. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Napier thesis requirements
Research Degrees Framework
document
• Section 8, pp. 54-57
• Specific instructions on
layout in the document
• Template from Frances
• Word count 50,000-100,000
• Aim for around 80,000
10. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Samples of theses – Hazel as DoS
11. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Iris Buunk, 2020 (Hall & Smith)
Social media as facilitators of tacit knowledge
sharing practices amongst public sector
employees
• Napier-funded, full-time
• Passed with minor corrections
• Iris now works as a Chief of Scientific
Information for a confederation of Swiss
universities
12. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Leo Appleton, 2020 (Hall, Raeside & Duff)
The 21st century public library in England
and Scotland: epistemic, community and
political roles in the public sphere
• Employer-funded, part-time
• Passed with minor corrections
• Leo now works as a Lecturer in the
Information School at the University of
Sheffield
13. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Lyndsey Middleton, 2020 (Hall, Raeside & Muir)
Exploring the development of innovative work
behaviour of employees in multiple workplace
contexts
• ESRC/SDS-funded, full-time
• Passed with minor corrections
• Lyndsey now works as a Senior Assistant
Statistician for the Scottish Government
14. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Frances Ryan, 2019 (Hall, Lawson & Cruickshank)
Reputation management in a digital world: The
role of online information in the building,
management, and evaluation of personal
reputations
• Napier-funded, full-time
• Passed with minor corrections
• Frances now works as a Lecturer in SCEBE at
Edinburgh Napier University
15. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
John Mowbray, 2018 (Hall, Raeside & Robertson)
The role of networking and social media tools
during job search: an information behaviour
perspective
• ESRC/SDS-funded, full-time
• Passed with minor corrections
• John now works as a Social Researcher for the
Scottish Government
17. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Intro 4%
Literature review 23%
Methodology &
methods 16%
Findings 38%
Discussion 15%
Concl 4%
Thesis chapter portions
SECTION WORDS
Introduction 3,200
Literature review 18,400
Methodology &
methods
12,800
Findings 30,400
Discussion 12,000
Conclusion 3,200
TOTAL 80,000
18. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Exercise: What goes where?
Discuss the following questions
1. What should be introduced in the Introduction chapter?
2. How should you organise the content of the Literature Review chapter?
3. What’s the difference between ‘methodology’ and ’methods’?
4. How do the contents of the Findings chapter differ from the contents of
the Discussion?
19. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Q1. Introduction
• The Introduction chapter is an introduction to the thesis as a document
• (The function of Introduction chapter is NOT to introduce the topic of
your research)
• Include here contextual information required for the reader to make
sense of the contents of the thesis (e.g. policy context explained in John’s
thesis, pp. 16-17)
• Include here definitions of key terms used in the thesis (e.g. Table 1 on p.
8 of Frances’ thesis)
• Include clear navigational information - as narrative (e.g John), in a table
(e.g Iris), or bulleted list (e.g. Frances)
20. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Q2. Literature review
• The presentation of the core material should be thematic
• It should fit with the title of your thesis
• It should NOT be presented author-by-author – it’s an analytical review,
not a catalogue
• Some PhD candidates present their theoretical framework towards the
end of the Literature review chapter; others present it in a separate
chapter
21. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Iris’ main literature review headings
Social media as facilitators of tacit
knowledge sharing practices amongst public
sector employees
• Knowledge
• Knowledge sharing
• Social technologies
• Understanding the public sector
• Tacit knowledge sharing and social media in
the public sector
22. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Lyndsey’s main literature review headings
Exploring the development of innovative work
behaviour of employees in multiple workplace
contexts
• Organisational learning, employee-led
innovation, and workplace learning
• The development of innovative work
behaviour
23. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
John’s main literature review headings
The role of networking and social media tools
during job search: an information behaviour
perspective
• Social networks, and informal channels of
information during job search
• Networking as an information seeking
behaviour during job search
• The adoption of social media tools
24. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
The place of key theory and
concepts in the thesis: options
• John and Lyndsey: discuss established theory of relevance to their
studies in Theoretical Framework chapters
• Leo: presents 4 established theories in ‘Theoretical considerations’ at
the end of his Literature review chapter
• Frances: presents ‘Theoretical framework developed and used in this
study’ at the end of her Literature review chapter
• Iris: uses concepts from Literature Review - including established theory
– to feed into a conceptual framework at the end of her Literature
review chapter
25. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Q3. Methodology and methods
• When writing about Methodology, you present the overarching approach
to your research, with reference to your own theoretical
perspective/position on conceptualisations of reality/truth (ontology) and
the relationship between the observer and the observed (epistemology),
i.e. your research philosophy
• The write-up of Methods (i.e. specific tools/procedures used to collect
and analyse data, for example interviews, surveys, focus groups) focuses
on the implementation of your empirical study
• The two elements are linked: the write-up of Methodology serves as a
justification for the deployment of particular methods - see the beginning
of Chapter 4 of Lyndsey’s thesis for an example.
26. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Methodology & methods
chapter pointers
• Research philosophy (short)
• Research design
• Research implementation
• Fieldwork
• Data analysis
• Ethical considerations
Implementation details
• Give plenty of detail – who, what,
where, when
• Diagrammatic explanations of
processes undertaken are very
helpful
• Use appendices to full advantage
27. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Q4. Findings and Discussion
• In the Findings chapter (or chapters) you present the outcome of
analysing the data collected for your empirical study
• In the Discussion chapter you discuss the meaning and implications of
your findings with reference to the body of extant knowledge
presented in your literature review
• Two common options for presenting the content of the Discussion
chapter are by research question (Iris, Lyndsey, John), or by
contribution (Leo, Frances)
• In terms of chapter length, the Findings chapter (or chapters) is
usually at least double that of the Discussion
28. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Discussion chapter ‘recipe’ 1
• First remind the reader of extant knowledge (literature) on the
specific point of interest. Here you are mining your literature review
for Discussion chapter content. For example:
In prior work it has been found that… [summarise extant knowledge on the
specific point of interest from literature review], [cross references to pages in
the literature review chapter where the full detail can be found; if there is a
particular researcher who is important to your line of argument, add the
reference, otherwise give an example]
• OR, if nothing exists on this topic, say so. For example:
• Researchers in this domain have not previously focused their attention on the
topic of xyz.
29. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Discussion chapter ‘recipe’ 2
• Then remind the reader of the knowledge on this point of interest
from your findings, as related in the earlier chapters of your thesis.
Here you are mining your Findings chapter(s) for Discussion chapter
content. For example:
The findings from this research show that… [summarise detail of your findings
on this point of interest] [cross references to pages in the Findings chapter(s)
where the detail can be found]
30. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Discussion chapter ‘recipe’ 3
• Next provide commentary on the meaning/implications of the
similarities/differences between extant knowledge (as reported in full
in your literature review chapter) and the new knowledge from your
empirical study for this point of interest
• This is the important new content in the Discussion chapter (as
opposed to that just presented, which simply reminds the reader
about relevant material in the Literature review and Findings
chapters); it underpins your ‘contribution’
• The format of the line of argument varies according to the relationship
between (a) your findings and (b) prior knowledge as summarised in
your Literature review chapter
31. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Discussion chapter ‘recipe’ 4a
• If your findings don’t really add anything new:
These findings from the empirical work undertaken for this doctoral study are
largely in line with prior work, adding to the body of evidence presented by
other scholars such as [add main references] that [xyz].
32. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Discussion chapter ‘recipe’ 4b
• If your findings extend prior knowledge:
While largely in line with prior work, the findings presented here add a further
dimension to the question of [xyz] in that [abc]. This research can therefore be
seen to extend the understanding of [xyz] in the context of [topic of research]. It
[give details of the extension to knowledge, why it is important, its implications
for research/practice/policy as appropriate].
33. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Discussion chapter ‘recipe’ 4c
• If your findings are in opposition to extant knowledge:
In contrast with the main message from the literature, here it is seen that [xyz].
This can be accounted for [add the reason(s) why your work has come up with
findings that do not align with those in the literature. Explain the significance of
this, e.g. it could be to do with the methods deployed in your study, the source
of the data that you analysed]. The implications of this finding is/are [add the
implication(s) – for research/practice/policy as appropriate].
34. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Discussion chapter ‘recipe’ 4d
• If your findings are completely new:
These findings demonstrate a novel contribution to research in this domain. As
well as having value in their own right, they open up new areas for investigation
such as [elaborate your ideas].
41. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
John: 9 chapters
• Chapter 1: Introduction
• Chapter 2: Literature review
• Chapter 3: Theoretical framework
• Chapter 4: Methodology
• Chapter 5: Findings – interviews
and focus groups with young
people
• Chapter 6: Findings – questionnaire
• Chapter 7: Findings – focus group
with careers advisors
• Chapter 8: Discussion
• Chapter 9: Conclusion
Findings split by
means of data
collection (like Iris)
42. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Exercise: Presentation of findings
What’s the best way for you to split your
findings?
• By means of data collection?(Iris and John)
• By themes developed during data analysis? (Frances)
• By research question? (Leo)
• By site of data collection? (Lyndsey)
43. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Exercise: Presentation of discussion
What’s the best way for you to organise the
content in your Discussion chapter?
• By research question (Lyndsey, John, Iris)
• By contribution
• Frances – 2 contributions
• Leo – 1 main contribution that covers 3 themes
• Regardless of means of organisation, the line of argument must make
frequent reference to extant knowledge presented in the analysis of
Chapter 2
44. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Order of chapter write up & ‘budget’
45. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Chapter Content Approximate
word count
Thesis
%
Notes Order of
completion
1 Introduction 3,200 4% Contingent on completion of Chapters 2-6 5th
2 Literature
review
18,400 23% RD5 version updates contingent on completion of
Findings chapter(s), and access to material
published since RD5
3rd
3 Methodology
and methods
12,800 16% RD5 version updates contingent on details of
implementation of data collection and analysis
2nd
4 Findings 30,400 38% Contingent on completion of data collection and
analysis
1st
5 Discussion 12,000 15% Contingent on completion of Chapter 2 4th
6 Conclusion 3,200 4% Contingent on completion of Chapters 1-5 6th
Totals 80,000 100%
46. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Intro 4%
Literature review 23%
Methodology 16%
Findings 38%
Discussion 15%
Concl 4%
Thesis chapter portions
How long will it take to write?
• 75% Findings
• 20% Discussion
• 5% Literature Review, Methodology,
Conclusion, and Introduction
47. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Exercise: Pre-existing thesis content
How much thesis material do you already
have written up?
Conference paper
on methodology
Conference paper on
preliminary findings
48. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Importance of the abstract
49. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Assessor provides
300 word report, plus answers to the following questions:
• Does the thesis represent an original contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent a significant contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent an independent contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent an appropriate understanding of research
methods?
• Is the presentation of the thesis satisfactory?
• Does the thesis demonstrate an appropriate understanding of the
literature?
• Is the abstract satisfactory?
50. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Thesis abstract ‘recipe’
This work is concerned with [broad topic].
The main contributions of the research relate to [sub-areas of broad topic].
The findings extend knowledge of [xyz].
The findings derive from [brief explanation of approach to data collection and analysis].
The main contributions of the research are [state contributions, both theoretical and
practical]. These contributions are significant because [state reasons].
52. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Assessor provides
300 word report, plus answers to the following questions:
• Does the thesis represent an original contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent a significant contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent an independent contribution to knowledge?
• Does the the thesis represent an appropriate understanding of research
methods?
• Is the presentation of the thesis satisfactory?
• Does the thesis demonstrate an appropriate understanding of the
literature?
• Is the abstract satisfactory?
53. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Satisfactory presentation depends on a strong line of argument, in
writing that is:
• Concise
• Precise
• Focussed
• Grammatical
• Not reliant on artificial means of emphasis
• Often quite simply presented
• Organised according to conventions of the format in question
54. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make this sentence more concise?
‘The research was carried out in order to establish whether or not
information technology helped or hindered the work of employees in
the workplace.’
55. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make this sentence more concise?
‘The research was carried out in order to establish whether or not
information technology helped or hindered the work of employees in
the workplace.’
‘The research was carried out to establish whether information
technology helped employees.’
56. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make this sentence more precise?
‘The project was overseen by an advisory board representing funders,
senior academics, and policy makers.’
57. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make this sentence more precise?
‘The project was overseen by an advisory board representing funders
such as the Scottish Government, senior academics including four
professors, and policy makers from Skills Development Scotland.’
Or
‘The project was overseen by an advisory board representing
stakeholders.’
58. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make this sentence more focussed?
‘This participant served on her school open day committee in 2022
and helped run the information desk on the day of the event. She also
undertook school work experience at a local museum in 2021. This
role involved answering visitor enquiries. Then for her summer job in
she worked as a silver service waiter. She also helps out working in
the shop of my parents’ business whenever they are short-staffed.’
59. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make this sentence more focussed?
‘This participant held customer-facing roles in the hospitality and
retail sectors. She also offered experience of dealing with the public
through a volunteer role at school, and work experience in a
museum.’
60. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make these sentences grammatical?
‘The team were sent to London.’
‘The data was collected in three phases.’
‘This thesis presents an account of the research project’
61. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you make these sentences grammatical?
‘The team were sent to London.’
‘The data was collected in three phases.’
‘This thesis presents an account of the research project’
‘The team was sent to London.’
‘The data were collected in three phases.’
‘An account of the research project is presented in this thesis’
62. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you identify the artificial means of emphasis to be removed?
‘Interestingly, these findings show that…’
‘Obviously, academic libraries provide a core service in all
universities.’
63. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you identify the artificial means of emphasis to be removed?
‘Interestingly, these findings show that…’
‘Obviously, academic libraries provide a core service in all
universities.’
‘Interestingly, these findings show that…’
‘Obviously, academic libraries provide a core service in all
universities.’
64. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you present this information more simply to make it more easily
read?
‘The setting chosen for this study is Scotland’s national career service
– Skills Development Scotland (SDS) – which supports individuals of
all ages into further learning opportunities and employment, and
develops their career management, work-based and employability
skills.’
65. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Can you present this information more simply to make it more easily
read?
‘The setting chosen for this study is Scotland’s national career service
– Skills Development Scotland (SDS). SDS supports individuals of all
ages into further learning opportunities and employment. This body
also develops career management, work-based and employability
skills of the Scottish workforce.’
66. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Remember to follow the conventions of the format in question –
different outputs have different requirements
Journal article PhD thesis
Presentation of content In sections
Length Strict word limits
Literature review Succinct summary
Account of empirical
work
Short
Account of findings Selective
67. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Remember to follow the conventions of the format in question –
different outputs have different requirements
Journal article PhD thesis
Presentation of content In sections In chapters
Length Strict word limits Lengthy
Literature review Succinct summary Comprehensive analysis
Account of empirical
work
Short Full, with examples of
‘workings’
Account of findings Selective Complete
68. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
And when you have recovered from
the thesis write-up, you’ll be ready to
write the ‘big’ paper from your
doctoral study!
69. Hazel Hall | @hazelh | www.hazelhall.org | h.hall@napier.ac.uk
Preparation of the PhD thesis for examination
Professor Hazel Hall