Collaboration and networking: learning from DREaM and RIVALHazel Hall
Discusses the extent of networking and collaboration amongst library and information science researchers and practitioners who took part in the AHRC-funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project in 2011/12, and the extent to which learning from this grant has influenced the delivery of the Royal Society of Edinburgh funded Research Impact and Value and Library and Information Science project in 2019/20.
Creating a UK-wide network of LIS researchersHazel Hall
Presentation delivered at the Library Research Symposium. McMaster University, Canada, 3 November 2015.
The aim of the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods project, was to develop a formal UK-wide network of Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers (academic and practitioner). The project ran from January 2011 to August 2012, and was supported by the UK Library and Information Science Research Coalition.
The initial successes of the DREaM project were reported in a paper that Hazel Hall co-authored with Alison Brettle and Charles Oppenheim and presented at QQML 2012. Three years later in summer 2015, Hall and her colleague Bruce Ryan conducted further research to explore any lasting impacts of the project.
Those who attended three DREaM research methods workshops in 2011/12 were invited to complete a survey in June 2015. The survey questions focused on LIS work undertaken since the last DREaM workshop in April 2012. Respondents were asked to report on the use of the methods presented at the DREaM workshops; any new DREaM-inspired LIS research and publications, and their impacts; the influence of DREaM on individual career paths; and any on-going contact between those who developed relationships with one another over the course of the three workshops. Further data for the 2015 project – known as DREaM Again - were collected formally from focus groups and more informally through email contact with DREaM workshop participants.
In this presentation the main findings of DREaM Again are discussed.
A coordinated approach to Library and Information Science Research: the UK ex...Hazel Hall
In 2009, the Library and Information Science (LIS) Research Coalition was established in the UK by major players in the LIS landscape. The Coalition had a particular interest in supporting practicing librarians and information scientists, both in how they can access and exploit available research in their work, and in their own development as practitioner researchers.
One of the Coalition’s key initiatives was the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project, through which a formal UK-wide network of LIS researchers was successfully developed. In this presentation, Professor Hall discusses how the LIS Research Coalition tackled the challenges of LIS research at a national level and reflects on the longer-term impact of the project with particular reference to the findings of the DREaM Again project—a recent follow-up exploration of the lasting impacts of DREaM. Not only have half of the DREaM participants been actively involved in research since the end of the project, but just under half report that their research outputs have already had an impact—informing policy, and/or determining information services provision, and/or developing the LIS research agenda. Analysis of the network ties between the participants reveals that a loose but persistent network of DREaMers endures, wherein both social and work-related connections are important.
What happens next? Strategies for building and assessing the long-term impact...Hazel Hall
Presentation delivered to the 8th International Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries on impact in the context of library and information science research
Stop Press: Libraries' Role in the Future of PublishingDanny Kingsley
This was presented to the SLA2016 conference in Philadelphia on 12 June.
ABSTRACT: Libraries are moving from curators of bought content to providing access to research or industry outputs. This activity can range from the relatively informal process of dissemination through a repository to acting as publishers - through the hosting of research journals, bibliographies and newsletters to the provision of editorial services and advice. This 90 minute Master Class will look at different models of publishing in the library environment with several examples of publishing activity in different libraries. The session will start with a strategic overview of the need for libraries to actively engage in the dissemination of information created by their organisations. The discussion will cover the staffing implications including how to recruit and train for the required skills sets. Attendees will work through some of the issues that need to be considered if a library is interested in publishing, including some of the legal implications and the different software and technical platforms available. Ideas will be workshopped about ways to engage the institutional community and encourage uptake of services on offer. The class aims to provide practical information to allow attendees to make decisions about what services are achievable to offer their clients, both from a technical and a staffing perspective. Attendees who are currently publishing are actively encouraged to participate in the discussion.
The document summarizes a case study of how the University of Leeds integrated Intute resources and services to create subject guides for their library portal. They implemented Intute's integration services which allowed them to add Intute's search box and records to their website. This reduced their workload as Intute handled keeping links and resources up to date. It also provided better quality assured resources than they could find themselves. The project resulted in estimated cost savings of over $20,000 by eliminating the need for their own server, software, and link/content checking.
Research Impact Value and LIS, Edinburgh 11th July 2018: speaker slidesHazel Hall
This document summarizes a presentation on practitioner research given at the "Research, Impact, Value and Library and Information Science" event. It discusses two past projects - the Library and Information Science Research Coalition from 2009-2012 and the Developing Research Excellence and Methods project from 2011-2012. For both projects, it examines their goals, activities, outputs and measured impact, which was largely at the professional level rather than in direct services delivery. Challenges in measuring research impact in the library and information science field are also outlined.
This document summarizes Alex Humphreys' presentation on JSTOR Labs and their work on user-driven innovation projects with libraries and other partners. The presentation included three case studies: JSTOR Snap, a tool for capturing snippets from articles; JSTOR Sustainability, which developed topic pages on sustainability; and Understanding Shakespeare, a collaboration with Folger Shakespeare Library. Humphreys discussed JSTOR Labs' approach of rapid prototyping through "flash builds", gathering user feedback throughout the process, and continually iterating projects. He highlighted lessons for libraries and publishers in adopting more innovative practices.
Collaboration and networking: learning from DREaM and RIVALHazel Hall
Discusses the extent of networking and collaboration amongst library and information science researchers and practitioners who took part in the AHRC-funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project in 2011/12, and the extent to which learning from this grant has influenced the delivery of the Royal Society of Edinburgh funded Research Impact and Value and Library and Information Science project in 2019/20.
Creating a UK-wide network of LIS researchersHazel Hall
Presentation delivered at the Library Research Symposium. McMaster University, Canada, 3 November 2015.
The aim of the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods project, was to develop a formal UK-wide network of Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers (academic and practitioner). The project ran from January 2011 to August 2012, and was supported by the UK Library and Information Science Research Coalition.
The initial successes of the DREaM project were reported in a paper that Hazel Hall co-authored with Alison Brettle and Charles Oppenheim and presented at QQML 2012. Three years later in summer 2015, Hall and her colleague Bruce Ryan conducted further research to explore any lasting impacts of the project.
Those who attended three DREaM research methods workshops in 2011/12 were invited to complete a survey in June 2015. The survey questions focused on LIS work undertaken since the last DREaM workshop in April 2012. Respondents were asked to report on the use of the methods presented at the DREaM workshops; any new DREaM-inspired LIS research and publications, and their impacts; the influence of DREaM on individual career paths; and any on-going contact between those who developed relationships with one another over the course of the three workshops. Further data for the 2015 project – known as DREaM Again - were collected formally from focus groups and more informally through email contact with DREaM workshop participants.
In this presentation the main findings of DREaM Again are discussed.
A coordinated approach to Library and Information Science Research: the UK ex...Hazel Hall
In 2009, the Library and Information Science (LIS) Research Coalition was established in the UK by major players in the LIS landscape. The Coalition had a particular interest in supporting practicing librarians and information scientists, both in how they can access and exploit available research in their work, and in their own development as practitioner researchers.
One of the Coalition’s key initiatives was the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project, through which a formal UK-wide network of LIS researchers was successfully developed. In this presentation, Professor Hall discusses how the LIS Research Coalition tackled the challenges of LIS research at a national level and reflects on the longer-term impact of the project with particular reference to the findings of the DREaM Again project—a recent follow-up exploration of the lasting impacts of DREaM. Not only have half of the DREaM participants been actively involved in research since the end of the project, but just under half report that their research outputs have already had an impact—informing policy, and/or determining information services provision, and/or developing the LIS research agenda. Analysis of the network ties between the participants reveals that a loose but persistent network of DREaMers endures, wherein both social and work-related connections are important.
What happens next? Strategies for building and assessing the long-term impact...Hazel Hall
Presentation delivered to the 8th International Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries on impact in the context of library and information science research
Stop Press: Libraries' Role in the Future of PublishingDanny Kingsley
This was presented to the SLA2016 conference in Philadelphia on 12 June.
ABSTRACT: Libraries are moving from curators of bought content to providing access to research or industry outputs. This activity can range from the relatively informal process of dissemination through a repository to acting as publishers - through the hosting of research journals, bibliographies and newsletters to the provision of editorial services and advice. This 90 minute Master Class will look at different models of publishing in the library environment with several examples of publishing activity in different libraries. The session will start with a strategic overview of the need for libraries to actively engage in the dissemination of information created by their organisations. The discussion will cover the staffing implications including how to recruit and train for the required skills sets. Attendees will work through some of the issues that need to be considered if a library is interested in publishing, including some of the legal implications and the different software and technical platforms available. Ideas will be workshopped about ways to engage the institutional community and encourage uptake of services on offer. The class aims to provide practical information to allow attendees to make decisions about what services are achievable to offer their clients, both from a technical and a staffing perspective. Attendees who are currently publishing are actively encouraged to participate in the discussion.
The document summarizes a case study of how the University of Leeds integrated Intute resources and services to create subject guides for their library portal. They implemented Intute's integration services which allowed them to add Intute's search box and records to their website. This reduced their workload as Intute handled keeping links and resources up to date. It also provided better quality assured resources than they could find themselves. The project resulted in estimated cost savings of over $20,000 by eliminating the need for their own server, software, and link/content checking.
Research Impact Value and LIS, Edinburgh 11th July 2018: speaker slidesHazel Hall
This document summarizes a presentation on practitioner research given at the "Research, Impact, Value and Library and Information Science" event. It discusses two past projects - the Library and Information Science Research Coalition from 2009-2012 and the Developing Research Excellence and Methods project from 2011-2012. For both projects, it examines their goals, activities, outputs and measured impact, which was largely at the professional level rather than in direct services delivery. Challenges in measuring research impact in the library and information science field are also outlined.
This document summarizes Alex Humphreys' presentation on JSTOR Labs and their work on user-driven innovation projects with libraries and other partners. The presentation included three case studies: JSTOR Snap, a tool for capturing snippets from articles; JSTOR Sustainability, which developed topic pages on sustainability; and Understanding Shakespeare, a collaboration with Folger Shakespeare Library. Humphreys discussed JSTOR Labs' approach of rapid prototyping through "flash builds", gathering user feedback throughout the process, and continually iterating projects. He highlighted lessons for libraries and publishers in adopting more innovative practices.
Open science framework – Jeff Spies, Centre for Open Science
Active research from lab to publication – Simon Coles, University of Southampton
Managing active research in the university – Robin Rice, University of Edinburgh
Making research available: FAIR principles and Force 11 - David De Roure, Oxford e-Research Centre
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
Increase usage of online resources Edina presentationJISC RSC Eastern
This document outlines a plan to promote online resources using the SPARE framework:
1) Set the scene by considering the background context and why promotion is needed.
2) Prepare by getting ready before taking action and evaluating resources.
3) Act by carrying out agreed promotion activities.
4) Review usage and gather feedback to assess how promotion went.
5) Evaluate to decide next steps based on the review.
The document discusses challenges in promoting resources and getting user feedback, and provides tips for effective promotion through curation, updates, enthusiasm, multiple channels, and responsiveness.
Public engagement while you sleep? How altmetrics can help researchers broade...UoLResearchSupport
Slides from a seminar delivered for pepnet at the University of Leeds 28 Nov 2018. Thanks to Charlotte Perry-Houts for extra content:
From peer reviewed journal articles, to assorted reports and grey literature, to datasets comprising numerical, textual or multimedia files; we generate thousands of research outputs.
In this session, Kirsten Thompson (OD&PL) and Nick Sheppard (Library) will discuss strategies for increasing quality online engagement with that research. We will explore how you can use ‘alternative metrics’, more commonly known as ‘altmetrics’, to monitor such engagement. Altmetrics can help to showcase the reach of your work, supplement grant and tenure applications, identify new audiences, and connect with other researchers in your discipline.
In the age of “fake news”, academics have a responsibility to share their expertise beyond the Ivory Tower. We’ll show you how to ensure all these disparate outputs are properly curated in university repositories with a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). There will also be an opportunity to learn about and contribute to the Library led Data Management Engagement Award, a first-ever competition launched to elicit new and imaginative ideas for engaging researchers in the practices of good Research Data Management (RDM).
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work. Workshop facilitated by Kirsten Thompson and Nick Sheppard at the University of Leeds for the #PepnetLeeds network November 28th 2018.
The metric tide – Stephen Curry, Imperial College London, and Ben Johnson, HEFCE
Open infrastructures - Clifford Tatum, Leiden University
Open citation – Cameron Neylon, Curtin University
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
Figshare for institutions - Jisc Digifest 2016Jisc
In May 2015 the EPSRC policy framework on research data came into effect. Salford University partnered with figshare to not only answer the mandate but to enhance the visibility of the research generated at the institution. All public facing research outputs are freely available to the wider public at salford.figshare.com.
Learn more about University of Salford’s approach and get a high level overview of the latest figshare functionality.
Apo presentation research librarians day feb 2017SusanMRob
Engagement & Impact through Open Access policy and Practice research & Resources via Australian Policy Online by Amanda Lawrence - presented at the Research Support Community Day 2017
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work
Slides from workshop to pepnet (Public Engagement network) at the University of Leeds on 28th November 2018
This document summarizes research on incentives for researchers to share their data. It discusses findings from qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys. Key findings include:
- Individual researchers are motivated by benefits to their own research, career, and discipline's norms. They are influenced by funder and journal policies.
- Institutional supports like data infrastructure, funding, and training also influence researchers' data sharing practices. Funder requirements and assistance with data management increase sharing.
- Studies found the main individual motivations are career benefits and research impact. The main institutional factors are skills training, support services, and policies that ensure proper data reuse and acknowledgement.
The document summarizes the African Open Science Platform (AOSP), an initiative to create an open digital ecosystem in Africa. It discusses AOSP's goals of building capacities, policies, shared computing resources, and tools to support open science and interaction with societal stakeholders. It also outlines AOSP's governance structure, initial activities, key supporting communities, the current African open science landscape, and a framework for future policy, infrastructure, capacity building, and incentives to further open science on the continent.
NISO Virtual Conference
Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Institution and its Intellectual Wealth
Enabling transparency and efficiency in the research landscape
Dr. Melissa Haendel, Associate Professor, Ontology Development Group, OHSU Library, Department of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University
Sitations are the way that researchers communicate how
their work builds on and relates to the work of others and
they can be used to trace how a discovery spreads and is
used by researchers in different disciplines and countries.
Creating a truly comprehensive map of scholarship,
however, relies on having a curated machine-readable
database of citation information, where the provenance of
every citation is clear and reusable. The Initiative for Open
Citations (I4OC), a campaign launched on 6 April 2017,
sought to make publisher members of Crossref aware that
they could open up the citation metadata they already give
to Crossref simply by asking them. With the support of
major publishers and the endorsement of funders and other
organisations, more than 50% of citation data in Crossref
is now freely available, up from less than 1% before the
campaign. This provides the foundation of a well-structured,
open database of literally millions of datapoints that anyone
can query, mine, consume and explore. The presenter will
discuss the aims of the campaign, the new innovative
services that are already using the data, what more still
needs to be done and how you can support the initiative.
Catriona J MacCallum, Hindawi
Stereotype and most popular recommendations in the digital library SowiportJoeran Beel
Stereotype and most-popular recommendations are widely neglected in the research-paper recommender-system and digital-library community. In other domains such as movie recommendations and hotel search, however, these recommendation approaches have proven their effectiveness. We were interested to find out how stereotype and most-popular recommendations would perform in the scenario of a digital library. Therefore, we implemented the two approaches in the recommender system of GESIS’ digital library Sowiport, in cooperation with the recommendations-as-a-service provider Mr. DLib. We measured the effectiveness of most-popular and stereotype recommendations with click-through rate (CTR) based on 28 million delivered recommendations. Most-popular recommendations achieved a CTR of 0.11%, and stereotype recommendations achieved a CTR of 0.124%. Compared to a “random recommendations” baseline (CTR 0.12%), and a content-based filtering baseline (CTR 0.145%), the results are discouraging. However, for reasons explained in the paper, we concluded that more research is necessary about the effectiveness of stereotype and most-popular recommendations in digital libraries.
UK and US positions on open access – Steven Hill, HEFCE and Sarah Thomas, Harvard University
University of California and university digital library costing models – MacKenzie Smith, UC Davis
Total cost of ownership and flipped OA – Liam Earney, Jisc
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
This document summarizes a presentation about open data and science in Africa. It discusses the benefits of open data, such as enabling more informed decisions and driving development. It also addresses challenges like researchers' fears of having errors or incomplete data exposed. The presentation promotes the African Open Science Platform, which aims to establish open data policies and build capacity through workshops on data skills. The platform connects stakeholders to advance open data and science across Africa.
The document summarizes discussions from the first event of the RIVAL network in Edinburgh on July 11, 2019. Participants hoped the RIVAL program would: 1) improve the use of LIS research in practice and practice in research; 2) foster better collaboration between LIS departments and practitioners; and 3) identify priorities for future research areas like AI. They also hoped it would increase appreciation of LIS skills, encourage more research, and develop tangible outcomes. For future events, participants suggested building connections between events, advertising more widely, and including unstructured program elements. Barriers included understanding different sector restrictions and determining the network's ambitions. For the final event, ideas were to take RIVAL on tour, celebrate successes, and ensure
Presentation delivered by Professor Hazel Hall at the RIVAL Reunion event in Edinburgh, 25th May 2023. Further details of the event at https://blogs.napier.ac.uk/social-informatics/2023/05/rival-reunion-event-25-may-2023/
Open science framework – Jeff Spies, Centre for Open Science
Active research from lab to publication – Simon Coles, University of Southampton
Managing active research in the university – Robin Rice, University of Edinburgh
Making research available: FAIR principles and Force 11 - David De Roure, Oxford e-Research Centre
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
Increase usage of online resources Edina presentationJISC RSC Eastern
This document outlines a plan to promote online resources using the SPARE framework:
1) Set the scene by considering the background context and why promotion is needed.
2) Prepare by getting ready before taking action and evaluating resources.
3) Act by carrying out agreed promotion activities.
4) Review usage and gather feedback to assess how promotion went.
5) Evaluate to decide next steps based on the review.
The document discusses challenges in promoting resources and getting user feedback, and provides tips for effective promotion through curation, updates, enthusiasm, multiple channels, and responsiveness.
Public engagement while you sleep? How altmetrics can help researchers broade...UoLResearchSupport
Slides from a seminar delivered for pepnet at the University of Leeds 28 Nov 2018. Thanks to Charlotte Perry-Houts for extra content:
From peer reviewed journal articles, to assorted reports and grey literature, to datasets comprising numerical, textual or multimedia files; we generate thousands of research outputs.
In this session, Kirsten Thompson (OD&PL) and Nick Sheppard (Library) will discuss strategies for increasing quality online engagement with that research. We will explore how you can use ‘alternative metrics’, more commonly known as ‘altmetrics’, to monitor such engagement. Altmetrics can help to showcase the reach of your work, supplement grant and tenure applications, identify new audiences, and connect with other researchers in your discipline.
In the age of “fake news”, academics have a responsibility to share their expertise beyond the Ivory Tower. We’ll show you how to ensure all these disparate outputs are properly curated in university repositories with a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). There will also be an opportunity to learn about and contribute to the Library led Data Management Engagement Award, a first-ever competition launched to elicit new and imaginative ideas for engaging researchers in the practices of good Research Data Management (RDM).
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work. Workshop facilitated by Kirsten Thompson and Nick Sheppard at the University of Leeds for the #PepnetLeeds network November 28th 2018.
The metric tide – Stephen Curry, Imperial College London, and Ben Johnson, HEFCE
Open infrastructures - Clifford Tatum, Leiden University
Open citation – Cameron Neylon, Curtin University
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
Figshare for institutions - Jisc Digifest 2016Jisc
In May 2015 the EPSRC policy framework on research data came into effect. Salford University partnered with figshare to not only answer the mandate but to enhance the visibility of the research generated at the institution. All public facing research outputs are freely available to the wider public at salford.figshare.com.
Learn more about University of Salford’s approach and get a high level overview of the latest figshare functionality.
Apo presentation research librarians day feb 2017SusanMRob
Engagement & Impact through Open Access policy and Practice research & Resources via Australian Policy Online by Amanda Lawrence - presented at the Research Support Community Day 2017
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work
Slides from workshop to pepnet (Public Engagement network) at the University of Leeds on 28th November 2018
This document summarizes research on incentives for researchers to share their data. It discusses findings from qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys. Key findings include:
- Individual researchers are motivated by benefits to their own research, career, and discipline's norms. They are influenced by funder and journal policies.
- Institutional supports like data infrastructure, funding, and training also influence researchers' data sharing practices. Funder requirements and assistance with data management increase sharing.
- Studies found the main individual motivations are career benefits and research impact. The main institutional factors are skills training, support services, and policies that ensure proper data reuse and acknowledgement.
The document summarizes the African Open Science Platform (AOSP), an initiative to create an open digital ecosystem in Africa. It discusses AOSP's goals of building capacities, policies, shared computing resources, and tools to support open science and interaction with societal stakeholders. It also outlines AOSP's governance structure, initial activities, key supporting communities, the current African open science landscape, and a framework for future policy, infrastructure, capacity building, and incentives to further open science on the continent.
NISO Virtual Conference
Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Institution and its Intellectual Wealth
Enabling transparency and efficiency in the research landscape
Dr. Melissa Haendel, Associate Professor, Ontology Development Group, OHSU Library, Department of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University
Sitations are the way that researchers communicate how
their work builds on and relates to the work of others and
they can be used to trace how a discovery spreads and is
used by researchers in different disciplines and countries.
Creating a truly comprehensive map of scholarship,
however, relies on having a curated machine-readable
database of citation information, where the provenance of
every citation is clear and reusable. The Initiative for Open
Citations (I4OC), a campaign launched on 6 April 2017,
sought to make publisher members of Crossref aware that
they could open up the citation metadata they already give
to Crossref simply by asking them. With the support of
major publishers and the endorsement of funders and other
organisations, more than 50% of citation data in Crossref
is now freely available, up from less than 1% before the
campaign. This provides the foundation of a well-structured,
open database of literally millions of datapoints that anyone
can query, mine, consume and explore. The presenter will
discuss the aims of the campaign, the new innovative
services that are already using the data, what more still
needs to be done and how you can support the initiative.
Catriona J MacCallum, Hindawi
Stereotype and most popular recommendations in the digital library SowiportJoeran Beel
Stereotype and most-popular recommendations are widely neglected in the research-paper recommender-system and digital-library community. In other domains such as movie recommendations and hotel search, however, these recommendation approaches have proven their effectiveness. We were interested to find out how stereotype and most-popular recommendations would perform in the scenario of a digital library. Therefore, we implemented the two approaches in the recommender system of GESIS’ digital library Sowiport, in cooperation with the recommendations-as-a-service provider Mr. DLib. We measured the effectiveness of most-popular and stereotype recommendations with click-through rate (CTR) based on 28 million delivered recommendations. Most-popular recommendations achieved a CTR of 0.11%, and stereotype recommendations achieved a CTR of 0.124%. Compared to a “random recommendations” baseline (CTR 0.12%), and a content-based filtering baseline (CTR 0.145%), the results are discouraging. However, for reasons explained in the paper, we concluded that more research is necessary about the effectiveness of stereotype and most-popular recommendations in digital libraries.
UK and US positions on open access – Steven Hill, HEFCE and Sarah Thomas, Harvard University
University of California and university digital library costing models – MacKenzie Smith, UC Davis
Total cost of ownership and flipped OA – Liam Earney, Jisc
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
This document summarizes a presentation about open data and science in Africa. It discusses the benefits of open data, such as enabling more informed decisions and driving development. It also addresses challenges like researchers' fears of having errors or incomplete data exposed. The presentation promotes the African Open Science Platform, which aims to establish open data policies and build capacity through workshops on data skills. The platform connects stakeholders to advance open data and science across Africa.
The document summarizes discussions from the first event of the RIVAL network in Edinburgh on July 11, 2019. Participants hoped the RIVAL program would: 1) improve the use of LIS research in practice and practice in research; 2) foster better collaboration between LIS departments and practitioners; and 3) identify priorities for future research areas like AI. They also hoped it would increase appreciation of LIS skills, encourage more research, and develop tangible outcomes. For future events, participants suggested building connections between events, advertising more widely, and including unstructured program elements. Barriers included understanding different sector restrictions and determining the network's ambitions. For the final event, ideas were to take RIVAL on tour, celebrate successes, and ensure
Presentation delivered by Professor Hazel Hall at the RIVAL Reunion event in Edinburgh, 25th May 2023. Further details of the event at https://blogs.napier.ac.uk/social-informatics/2023/05/rival-reunion-event-25-may-2023/
Presentation by Hazel Hall at LIRG LIS research resources briefing, July 10th 2012, London. Further details at http://lisresearch.org/2012/07/10/research-into-practice-lis-research-resources-briefing/
Northumbria University is working to implement a robust research data management (RDM) solution. It has engaged in several activities to assess current RDM practices and infrastructure needs, including interviews with grant holders, a survey of researchers, and workshops with the Digital Curation Centre. Through these workshops, the university used the RISE model to evaluate its capabilities for data ingest, access, preservation, and more across several potential repository platforms. This helped provide evidence to secure budget and staffing to pilot and roll out a new RDM system starting in 2018. The university aims to go to procurement in September 2017 after finalizing business requirements and an options appraisal.
The webinar presentation summarizes the LEARN Toolkit project which developed best practices for research data management. It includes 23 case studies organized into 8 sections covering topics like policies, advocacy, costs, roles and responsibilities. The project produced a model research data management policy and guidance document to help institutions develop their own policies. It engaged stakeholders through workshops around Europe and Latin America to align policies and terminology. The materials from the project, including the model policy, are published in the LEARN Toolkit which aims to support research organizations in improving their research data management.
Incorporating a research-minded approach to professional practiceHazel Hall
Opening keynote presentation to the European Association for Health Information and Libraries, the International Conference of Animal Health Information Specialists, and the International Clinical Librarian Conference, University of Edinburgh, Wednesday 10th June 2015
Talk given at Griffith University in Australia on trends in Research Data Management, FAIR and current progress towards this in the European Open Science Cloud
Supporting Research Data Management in UK Universities: the Jisc Managing Res...L Molloy
Research data management in the UK: interventions by the Jisc Managing Research Data programme and the Digital Curation Centre. Specifies the importance of academic librarians for RDM. Includes links to openly available training resources. Presentation by L Molloy to ExLibris event, 'Excellence in Academic Knowledge Management', Utrecht, 29 October 2013.
4th OpenAIRE Workshop - Legal and Sustainability Issues for Open Access Infrastructures
Nov. Vilnius
Preliminary Results of the OpenAIRE Sustainability Study - Phoebe Koundouri, Associate Professor - Athens University of Economic and Business
Getting research into action: issues, challenges, solutions by Dr Sarah MortonHazel Hall
Sarah Morton has worked across research, policy and practice for most of her career, and will draw on examples from different settings encountered over this time in her presentation. She is keen to interrogate our learning about effective evidence use from the last 20 years, and review how this can be supported from research and practice perspectives. She will present a vision for the effective use of evidence of all kinds to plan, develop and improve policy, practice, and services. As part of this she will explain some of the ways that she is currently developing tools and support for effective evidence use.
Advocacy in Research Data Management. Session 3.2 of the RDMRose v3 materials.
The JISC funded RDMRose project (June 2012-May 2013) was a collaboration between the libraries of the University of Leeds, Sheffield and York, with the Information School at Sheffield to provide an Open Educational Resource for information professionals on Research Data Management. The materials were revised between November 2014 and February 2015 for the consortium of North West Academic Libraries (NoWAL).
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/is/research/projects/rdmrose
Cuna Ekmekcioglu (University of Edinburgh) - “Engaging academic support libra...ARLGSW
Presentation from the 6th CILIP ARLG-SW Discover Academic Research and Training Support Conference (DARTS6). Dartington Hall, Totnes, Thursday 24th – Friday 25th May 2018
Birgit Schmidt: RDA for Libraries from an International Perspectivedri_ireland
From "A National Approach to Open Research Data in Ireland", a workshop held on 8 September 2017 in National Library of Ireland, organised by The National Library of Ireland, the Digital Repository of Ireland, the Research Data Alliance and Open Research Ireland.
RD shared services and research data springJisc RDM
Daniela Duca's presentation at the DataVault workshop on 29 June. An overview of research at risk, research data shared service and research data spring.
A Step By Step Guide To Monitoring And EvaluationHeather Strinden
This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for community groups working on climate change and energy projects. It discusses why M&E is important, including improving projects, demonstrating effectiveness, and contributing to the evidence base. The document outlines key steps for groups to take in planning and implementing M&E, such as deciding what to monitor, involving stakeholders, clarifying objectives, and identifying relevant questions. It also provides examples of M&E methods and links to additional resources.
Learning analytics research informed institutional practiceYi-Shan Tsai
The document summarizes learning analytics research and initiatives at the University of Edinburgh. It discusses early MOOC and VLE analytics projects that aimed to understand student behaviors and identify patterns. It also describes the Learning Analytics Map of Activities, Research and Roll-out (LAMARR) and efforts to build institutional capacity for learning analytics. Challenges discussed include the effort required to analyze raw data and involve stakeholders. The document advocates developing critical and participatory approaches to educational data analysis.
Preparation of the PhD thesis for examinationHazel Hall
Training materials used with doctoral students faced with the challenge of writing up their research and asking themselves 'How do I write up my doctoral study?'
Platform to Platform project lightening talkHazel Hall
Lightning talk on the AHRC/Creative Informatics funded Platform to Platform project to create a podcast series based on Lorna Lloyd's 'Diary of the war', and assess audience engagement with archives in two different digital formats - (1) a Blipfoto journal of text and images, and (2) sound in podcast episodes.
Undertaking a part-time LIS PhD: 10 tips in 20 minutesHazel Hall
This document provides 10 tips for undertaking a part-time PhD from Dr. Hazel Hall based on her experience supervising and completing part-time PhDs. The tips address deciding if a part-time PhD is right, choosing supervisors and a topic, getting employer support, presenting research along the way, accepting feedback, and ensuring the thesis contributes new knowledge to the field. Key advice includes only pursuing a part-time PhD if committed to independent study for 6 years, choosing a stable supervisory team, negotiating support from employers, and publishing parts of the research as it is completed.
Platform to Platform: initial findings from the empirical studyHazel Hall
Initial findings from the empirical study of the Platform to Platform project are presented. The research centred on the creation of a podcast series based on the war diary of Lorna Lloyd (available at https://rss.com/podcasts/lornalloyd/), and the evaluation of audience engagement with it as compared with engagement with online text and images in a Blipfoto journal at http://blipfoto.com/lornal. The research was funded by the AHRC through the Creative Informatics programme.
Digital options: an assessment of audience engagement with a digitised set of...Hazel Hall
Paper presented at the Archives and Records Management conference, 2nd September 2022 on audience engagement with Lorna Lloyd's Diary of the war as a Blipfoto journal, and as a podcast series.
Using a multi-location, longitudinal focus group method to conduct qualitativ...Hazel Hall
Paper presented at 13th Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries International Conference (QQML2021) (virtual conference), 25-28 May 2021. Full text available at https://www.napier.ac.uk/~/media/worktribe/output-2755729/using-a-multi-location-longitudinal-focus-group-method-to-conduct-qualitative-research.pdf
Professor Hazel Hall introduced the fourth event of the RIVAL Network at Edinburgh Napier University. Since the last meeting, output teams have been working on deliverables and a joint funding application was unsuccessful. Lessons from RIVAL helped inform the Digital Proxies project. The teams then met to discuss progress and next steps, with an upcoming deadline of February 12th for further output team meetings and a wrap-up plenary session.
The document summarizes a presentation by Professor Hazel Hall at the Research, Impact, Value & LIS (RIVAL) Network Event 3 in Edinburgh on November 19th, 2020. The presentation discussed practitioner research, specifically focusing on the value and impact of such research, as well as research priorities. It provided an introduction of Professor Hall and outlined some of the activities of the RIVAL network since the previous event, including presentations, a joint funding application, and interactions between members.
Research, impact, value and library and information science (RIVAL): developm...Hazel Hall
The research-practice gap in Library and Information Science (LIS) is well documented, especially in respect of the difficulties of translating research into practice, and resultant lost opportunities. While many researchers attempt to explain this research-practice gap, few suggest strategies to address it. The creation of researcher-practitioner networks, however, is one approach that has been proved empirically to bridge the distance between the two communities. Such a network is currently operating in Scotland, funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Research, Impact, Value and Library and Information Science (RIVAL) is part-way through its implementation based around four knowledge exchange events for a network membership of 32 from a wide variety of LIS sectors. RIVAL’s successful delivery depends in part on the project leads’ experience of undertaking, and evaluating the impact of, a UK Arts and Humanities Research Council funded grant: the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project. Already there are indications that RIVAL is delivering value to network members. There is a strong expectation for this to be enhanced, both in the remainder of the funding period and beyond, offering theoretical contributions to the study of social networks, especially in respect of social capital development to support knowledge exchange.
Research into Practice case study 2: Library linked data implementations an...Hazel Hall
The document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Diane Pennington and Laura Cagnazzo on library linked data implementations and perceptions. The presentation discussed the evolution of the semantic web and linked open data principles. It provided an overview of a study on the status and perceptions of linked data among European national libraries and Scottish libraries. The study found lack of awareness and expertise to be challenges for implementation. Benefits included improved data visibility and opportunities for collaboration. Recommendations focused on training, collaboration, and developing implementation guidelines and case studies.
Catalysing research into practice from the ground upHazel Hall
David Stewart, CILIP President for 2019 and Regional Director of Health Library and Knowledge Services North, presents on his key presidential theme: the importance of evidence to underpin the difference that library services make. He provides an overview of CILIP’s plans for greater collaboration and co-ordination, and also shares details of work undertaken in NHS England. This includes (a) national research on return on investment, and (b) details of the Catalyst scheme in the North of England, which has been designed to develop librarian research capability and a ground-up, small-scale research programme.
This document summarizes the agenda and notes from a November 7, 2019 event hosted by the RIVAL Network in Edinburgh. The event focused on practitioner research, value, and impact. It included formal presentations from Professor Hazel Hall and others, as well as informal presentations from network members and discussions on opportunities to influence the development of the RIVAL Network and plan future events.
Scotland's school library strategy: advocacy and impact by Martina McChrystalHazel Hall
Vibrant libraries, thriving schools: a national strategy for school libraries in Scotland 2018-2023 is Scotland’s school library strategy. By showcasing the impact an excellent school library service can deliver, the strategy is intended to be used to influence decision-making in respect of school library provision. Martina's presentation outlines about her involvement in the development of the strategy as Chair of the National School Library Strategy Advisory Group, the strategy’s role in advocacy, and its anticipated impact.
Professor Hazel Hall introduces RIVAL - a collaborative network of Scotland-based Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers and practising library and information professionals interested in maximising the impact and value of library and information science research. The project, which runs in 2019 and 2020, is funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh. This is the first of the four networking events.
Research, Impact, Value and LIS = RIVAL.
Participatory Budgeting, São Paulo, BrazilHazel Hall
Summarises a research project on participatory budgeting in São Paulo, Brazil undertaken by Edinburgh Napier University researchers Dr Wegene Demeke and Dr Bruce Ryan, and supported by the Global Challenge Research Fund.
Practitioner research: value, impact, and prioritiesHazel Hall
Opening paper presented by Professor Hazel Hall at the ‘Themes and trends in library and information research‘ conference hosted by CILIP in Kent at Canterbury Christ Church University on Wednesday 8th November 2017.
Exploring information literacy through the lens of Activity TheoryHazel Hall
'Exploring information literacy through the lens of Activity Theory' is a paper presented by Bruce Ryan at the 5th European Conference on Information Literacy in St-Malo, France, 18th to 21st September 2017. It is concluded that Activity Theory is an appropriate tool for information literacy research. Its main strengths are found in the processes of preparing data collection tools and the extraction of ‘meaning’ from interview data. In addition, Activity Theory is especially powerful at identifying contradictions between the activities under scrutiny in research projects. In this case, since information literacy was viewed through the lens of Activity Theory, barriers to information sharing, and the stimulation of change in information practice, emerged as strong themes in the research project findings. **The full paper for this slide deck is available. Please see https://www.napier.ac.uk/research-and-innovation/research-search/outputs/exploring-information-literacy-through-the-lens-of-activity-theory **
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Conceptualisations of LIS research impact and value: Learning from the LIS Research Coalition and DREaM
1. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Practitioner research: value, impact, and priorities
Professor Hazel Hall
Edinburgh Napier University
Conceptualisations of LIS research impact and value:
Learning from the LIS Research Coalition and DREaM
4. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
http://hazelhall.org/about
@hazelh
5. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
https://drhazelhall.files.wordpress.com/
2018/07/2018_07-csi-flyer-v5-a4.pdf
6. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Today’s programme encourages us to:
1. Explore concepts and examples of the impact and value of LIS research
to services delivery in practice
2. Encourage the strengthening of links between creators, users, and end-
user beneficiaries of LIS research output
3. Narrow gaps between LIS research and practice
4. Lay the ground for future research-related support and collaborations
across the sector
7. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
‘There will also be contributions on the impact and value of past
investments at national level to support LIS research in the UK - notably the
Library and Information Science Research Coalition (2009-2012) and the
Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project (2011-
2012)’
8. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
2006-2008: Consultations
March 2009: Coalition formally established
by 5 founding members
August 2009: Dr Hazel Hall appointed to
lead the implementation, 2 days per week in
a seconded role
Establishment of the LIS Research Coalition
To facilitate a co-ordinated
and strategic approach to
LIS research across the UK
(2009-2012)
9. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
‘To facilitate a co-ordinated and strategic approach to LIS
research across the UK’
Provision of a formal structure
Improve access to LIS research
Maximise the relevance and impact of LIS research
Main aims
Bring together information about LIS research opportunities and results
Encourage dialogue between research funders
Promote LIS practitioner research and the translation of research outcomes into
practice
Articulate a strategic approach to LIS research
Promote the development of research capacity in LIS
10. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
http://lisresearch.org
@LISResearch
11. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Heavy use of social media
through Twitter feed still active
in 2018
12. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
To facilitate a co-ordinated
and strategic approach to LIS
research across the UK
(2009-2012)
To explore the extent to which
LIS research projects
influence practice (2011)
To create outputs to support
the use and execution of
research by librarians and
information scientists (2012)
To develop a UK-wide
network of LIS researchers
(2011-2012)
14. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
IMPACT
Benefits to economy, society, culture,
public policy/services, health,
environment, and/or quality of life
beyond academia
15. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
IMPACT THEMES IN THE LIS LITERATURE
1. Evaluation of library and
information services
Considers the impact of the use of
resources accessed through
libraries and information services
e.g. in end-user decision-making
Common in healthcare librarianship
2. Methods for the evaluation of
library and information services
Explores means of evaluating services
in context of demonstrating value and
improving their return on investment
3. Bibliometrics
Quantitative analyses of
publication collections: heavy use
of citation data and altmetrics
(Academic impact)
4. Relationship between LIS
research and practitioner work in
the domain
Assesses the extent to which theory
informs practice and – to a lesser
extent – how practice informs theory
16. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
IMPACT MEASUREMENT CHALLENGES IN LIS: EXAMPLES
‘Research into practice’ conceived as
a linear process in a single domain:
Time lags between execution of
research and its
applicability/application
Identification of impact when it lies
elsewhere
Lack of attribution/recognition:
Research-informed training sessions
Journalists’ reports in professional
literature
Funding mechanisms:
Research projects funded for the
execution of research
Funding (not usually) provided for
enhancing or measuring impact, e.g.
for extensive dissemination
strategies, impact evaluation studies
‘Gaming’ in measurement:
To present the best picture
REF
17. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Establishment of Library and Information
Science Research Australia (LISRA) March
2016
CILIP LIRG ‘invigorated’, adoption of Coalition
practices/initiatives
Research skills in CILIP’s (new) Professional
Knowledge and Skills Base (PKSB)
Some activities in Canada: library research
symposia in Ontario
All impact cited above is at the level of the
profession, rather than services delivery -
consistent with the Coalition’s main aims
(Indicative) impact of LIS Research Coalition
To facilitate a co-ordinated
and strategic approach to LIS
research across the UK
(2009-2012)
18. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
1. Had DREaM workshop participants
innovated in the workplace since 2012?
2. Had their post-DREaM research determined
services provision and/or influenced the LIS
research agenda?
3. To what extent could they point to any impact
of their post-DREaM research on end-user
communities?
4. Had the DREaM network opened up new
opportunities for their research?
5. Did they continue to work as a network?
Impact of DREaM: assessed in DREaM Again study
To develop a UK-wide
network of LIS researchers
(2011-2012)
19. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Online survey
Focus groups in Edinburgh and London
Some data collected by phone and email
32 out of the full population of 35 DREaM cadre
members provided data
Article (forthcoming) addresses RQs 1-4
Article published in Journal of Documentation
addresses RQ5
Hall, H., Cruickshank, P. & Ryan, B. (2018). Long-
term community development within a researcher
network: a social network analysis of the DREaM
project cadre. Journal of Documentation, 74(4),
844-861.
DREaM Again methods and outputs
20. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
RQ1: Had DREaM workshop
participants innovated in the workplace
since 2012?
Yes – but the extent to which this can be
attributed to DREaM cadre membership is
difficult to assess
If not innovating themselves, DREaM workshop
participants support innovation of end-users in
their research activities (e.g. encouragement of
the use of techniques such as social network
analysis)
Indications that the growth in the research
confidence of members attributable to DREaM
participation will embolden them to innovate in
the future
21. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
RQ2: Had their post-DREaM research
determined services provision and/or
influenced the LIS research agenda?
Yes – but the extent to which this
can be attributed to DREaM cadre
membership is difficult to assess
22. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
RQ3: To what extent could they point to any
impact of their post-DREaM research on end-
user communities?
Primarily as research methods evangelists
23. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
RQ4: Had the DREaM network opened up new
opportunities for their research?
YES!
Growth in confidence as researchers has encouraged uptake of
opportunities that might have previously been dismissed
Much on-going research-related activity (including publishing – all role
types), around a quarter of which has been undertaken with other cadre
members: 52% peer reviewing; 24% bidding for research funding; 21%
winning research funding
Learning from DREaM applied in majority of research outputs identified
Clear indications that much of this activity would not have occurred
without DREaM
Links between levels of network connectivity and productivity: the 12
most connected cadre members were also the most productive
24. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
RQ5: Did they continue to work as a network?
YES!
A loose, but persistent network endured
Social ties were more important than work ties
Network members with the greatest centrality were from academic
institutions
Job status had no bearing on network centrality
Physical proximity was/is important to the maintenance of network ties
25. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Social infrastructure
Today’s delegates strengthen
links to narrow gaps:
Librarians: academic, health,
national, prison, public, school,
special
Plus: LIS academics,
professional body officers,
independent consultants, users
28. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Next up: presentations on impact and value in practice
29. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Contact Hazel Hall
@hazelh
http://hazelhall.org
http://about.me/hazelh
h.hall@napier.ac.uk
+44 (0)131 455 2760
Slides on SlideShare at:
http://slideshare.net/hazelhall
30. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lis_rival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2018
Practitioner research: value, impact, and priorities
Professor Hazel Hall
Edinburgh Napier University
Conceptualisations of LIS research impact and value:
Learning from the LIS Research Coalition and DREaM