www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com | www.poultryrecipes.co.in
www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com | www.poultryrecipes.co.in
Marcelo PANIAGO
Director Global Veterinary Services - Poultry
Ceva Santé Animale
Libourne - France
 Evolution of the poultry industry
 New technology vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
 Conclusion Sponsors
Content of the presentation
Evolution poultry industry
Sponsors
 Protection against mortality
 No post-vaccination reactions
 Reduction of shedding
 Easy to apply
 No interference with MDA
 Long lasting immunity
 Cost effectiveness
 Etc
www.poultry.allotment.org.uk www.engormix.com
 Protection against mortality
www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com | www.poultryrecipes.co.in
Factors of the evolution of the vaccines
Sponsors
 New diseases
New production systems
New genetics (breeds)
Better understanding of the diseases
New technologies
New requirements from the users
Others
Novel technologies for poultry vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
Novel technologies for poultry vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
Immune-complex vaccines
Sponsors
IBDV
Production in
Embryonated
SPF eggs
Virus suspension
VP2
IBDV vaccine
strain
Immune-complex vaccines
Sponsors
Specific antibodies VPI
(Virus Protecting Factor)
IBDV
+
Production in
Embryonated
SPF eggs
Virus suspension
Production in
SPF chickens
Flocks
antiserum
VP2
IBDV vaccine
strain
Advantages & Shortcomings
 No interference with MDAIBDV
 Continuous protection (passive
then active)
 Active immunity protects
against all types of IBDV
 Vaccine virus spreads and
compensate (partly) for sub-
optimal vaccine application
 Administered in the hatcheries
Sponsors
 Not recommended for layers
Novel technologies for poultry vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
Vector “HVT” vaccines
Sponsors
Non essential
gene
HVT = Vector
HVT
Insertion site
Inserted F
Protein gene
HVT
VECTOR
rHVT-F
NDV
F protein
F protein gene
NDV genome
NDV
Advantages & Shortcomings
 Evade maternally derived
antibodies
 Administration in the hatchery
 Cyclical replication in the host
expressing the antigen
 Continuous stimulation of the
immune system.
 Long-lasting immunity (latency)
Sponsors
 Onset of immunity depends on
the replication of the HVT
 It requires good cold chain
management (Liquid nitrogen)
 Early infection with Marek’s
Disease virus may reduce its
efficacy.
Novel technologies for poultry vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
Vector “cassete” vaccines
Sponsors
Inserted
HA gene
from
H5N1 HPAIV
HVT
Same vector / same construct / different inserts
Inserted
HA gene
from
H7N3 HPAIV
HVT
Advantages & Shortcomings
 Very quick response to any
changes in the prevalence of field
virus
 Cyclical replication in the host
expressing the antigen
 Continuous stimulation of the
immune system.
 Long-lasting immunity
 Administration in the hatchery
Sponsors
 Several regulatory issues that
have to be discussed with
authorities
 Onset of immunity depends on
the replication of the HVT
 Early infection with Marek’s
Disease virus may reduce its
efficacy.
 It requires good cold chain
management (Liquid nitrogen)
Novel technologies for poultry vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
Sub-unit vaccines
Sponsors
IBDV
VP2
VP2 gene
IBDV genome
IBDV = Donor
bacteria or yeast
Sub-unit vaccines
Sponsors
IBDV
VP2
VP2 gene
IBDV genome
IBDV = Donor
bacteria or yeast
Sub-unit vaccines
Sponsors
IBDV
Variant E
VP2
VP2 gene
IBDV genome
IBDV = Donor
bacteria or yeast
Inactivated vaccine
Advantages & Shortcomings
 Possibility to increase the
antigenic mass in the vaccines
(higher titers)
 Reduced cost of production
 Animal welfare friendly
approach
 There is no risk of reversion to
virulence
Sponsors
 The protective antigen has to be
known.
 It is necessary to use adjuvants
(tissue reactions)
 Immune response is limited to
humoral antibodies
 Individual injection is time
consuming and manpower
demanding
Novel technologies for poultry vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
Gene-deleted vaccines
Sponsors
One or more “non essential” genes for the growth and
immunogenicity but related to the pathogenicity of the
microorganisms are eliminated.
Advantages & Shortcomings
 Safer vaccines from pathogenic
microorganisms
 Possible application in the
hatchery or mass application in the
farms
 Do not elicit humoral antibody
response
 Differentiation between
vaccinated and infected animals
(DIVA) strategy
Sponsors
 Possibility to reverse to
virulence?
 Limited duration of immunity
 Need of revaccinations in the
farms
 Affected by anti-infective
compounds (Salmonella or E.coli).
Novel technologies for poultry vaccines
 Immune complex vaccines
 Vector vaccines
 Vector “cassete” vaccines
 Sub-unit vaccines
 Gene-deleted vaccines
 Reverse genetic vaccines
Reverse genetic vaccines
Sponsors
SOURCE: Zoetis (Fort Dodge) leaflet
Advantages & Shortcomings
 Improve the yield in SPF (or
clean) eggs during the production
of vaccines.
 Possibility of producing vaccines
closer to field virus (H5N1).
 Less risks in case of problems
during inactivation.
 Differentiation between
vaccinated and infected animals
(DIVA) strategy.
Sponsors
 Interference with MDA in case
of early administration
 Immune response is limited to
humoral antibodies
 Tissue reactions after injection
 Individual administration is time
consuming and manpower
demanding
www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com | www.poultryrecipes.co.in
Vaccine technologies – Duration of immunity
Source: Palya et al. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology,158, 105–115, 2014
0
20
40
60
80
100
3 4 6 10 15 25 33 40 55 72
%ofprotection
Age of challenge (weeks)
Clinical protection after challenge
Vaccine technologies – Duration of immunity
Sponsors
24 vaccination interventions
14 vaccination interventions
www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com | www.poultryrecipes.co.in
Food for thoughts …
Sponsors
 The poultry industry is changing extremely quickly
and it has brought new challenges to producers:
Huge production complexes located in very densely
populated areas;
High stocking densities in the farms;
High disease pressure;
Poorly qualified workers,
Pressure to reduce the use of antibiotics
Pressure to improve the welfare etc
Food for thoughts …
Sponsors
 Within this new context, new technology
vaccines will help to overcome these challenges.
 More efficacious and safer vaccines;
 Applied in the hatcheries;
 Long duration of immunity;
 Able to reduce the shedding of the pathogens
 Able to reduce the workload in the farms;
 The poultry vaccines of the future should be
what poultry producers will ask for!
www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com | www.poultryrecipes.co.in
marcelo.paniago@ceva.com
Marcelo Paniago
Ceva Santé Animale - France
Director Global Veterinary Services - Poultry
www. Ceva.com
Email: marcelo.paniago@ceva.com
Phone: +33 668 54 3931
Contact
Sponsors

Poultry India - Knowledge Day 2015 Speaker Dr. Marcelo Paniago

  • 1.
  • 2.
    www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com| www.poultryrecipes.co.in Marcelo PANIAGO Director Global Veterinary Services - Poultry Ceva Santé Animale Libourne - France
  • 3.
     Evolution ofthe poultry industry  New technology vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines  Conclusion Sponsors Content of the presentation
  • 4.
    Evolution poultry industry Sponsors Protection against mortality  No post-vaccination reactions  Reduction of shedding  Easy to apply  No interference with MDA  Long lasting immunity  Cost effectiveness  Etc www.poultry.allotment.org.uk www.engormix.com  Protection against mortality
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Factors of theevolution of the vaccines Sponsors  New diseases New production systems New genetics (breeds) Better understanding of the diseases New technologies New requirements from the users Others
  • 7.
    Novel technologies forpoultry vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines
  • 8.
    Novel technologies forpoultry vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines
  • 9.
    Immune-complex vaccines Sponsors IBDV Production in Embryonated SPFeggs Virus suspension VP2 IBDV vaccine strain
  • 10.
    Immune-complex vaccines Sponsors Specific antibodiesVPI (Virus Protecting Factor) IBDV + Production in Embryonated SPF eggs Virus suspension Production in SPF chickens Flocks antiserum VP2 IBDV vaccine strain
  • 11.
    Advantages & Shortcomings No interference with MDAIBDV  Continuous protection (passive then active)  Active immunity protects against all types of IBDV  Vaccine virus spreads and compensate (partly) for sub- optimal vaccine application  Administered in the hatcheries Sponsors  Not recommended for layers
  • 12.
    Novel technologies forpoultry vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines
  • 13.
    Vector “HVT” vaccines Sponsors Nonessential gene HVT = Vector HVT Insertion site Inserted F Protein gene HVT VECTOR rHVT-F NDV F protein F protein gene NDV genome NDV
  • 14.
    Advantages & Shortcomings Evade maternally derived antibodies  Administration in the hatchery  Cyclical replication in the host expressing the antigen  Continuous stimulation of the immune system.  Long-lasting immunity (latency) Sponsors  Onset of immunity depends on the replication of the HVT  It requires good cold chain management (Liquid nitrogen)  Early infection with Marek’s Disease virus may reduce its efficacy.
  • 15.
    Novel technologies forpoultry vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines
  • 16.
    Vector “cassete” vaccines Sponsors Inserted HAgene from H5N1 HPAIV HVT Same vector / same construct / different inserts Inserted HA gene from H7N3 HPAIV HVT
  • 17.
    Advantages & Shortcomings Very quick response to any changes in the prevalence of field virus  Cyclical replication in the host expressing the antigen  Continuous stimulation of the immune system.  Long-lasting immunity  Administration in the hatchery Sponsors  Several regulatory issues that have to be discussed with authorities  Onset of immunity depends on the replication of the HVT  Early infection with Marek’s Disease virus may reduce its efficacy.  It requires good cold chain management (Liquid nitrogen)
  • 18.
    Novel technologies forpoultry vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines
  • 19.
    Sub-unit vaccines Sponsors IBDV VP2 VP2 gene IBDVgenome IBDV = Donor bacteria or yeast
  • 20.
    Sub-unit vaccines Sponsors IBDV VP2 VP2 gene IBDVgenome IBDV = Donor bacteria or yeast
  • 21.
    Sub-unit vaccines Sponsors IBDV Variant E VP2 VP2gene IBDV genome IBDV = Donor bacteria or yeast Inactivated vaccine
  • 22.
    Advantages & Shortcomings Possibility to increase the antigenic mass in the vaccines (higher titers)  Reduced cost of production  Animal welfare friendly approach  There is no risk of reversion to virulence Sponsors  The protective antigen has to be known.  It is necessary to use adjuvants (tissue reactions)  Immune response is limited to humoral antibodies  Individual injection is time consuming and manpower demanding
  • 23.
    Novel technologies forpoultry vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines
  • 24.
    Gene-deleted vaccines Sponsors One ormore “non essential” genes for the growth and immunogenicity but related to the pathogenicity of the microorganisms are eliminated.
  • 25.
    Advantages & Shortcomings Safer vaccines from pathogenic microorganisms  Possible application in the hatchery or mass application in the farms  Do not elicit humoral antibody response  Differentiation between vaccinated and infected animals (DIVA) strategy Sponsors  Possibility to reverse to virulence?  Limited duration of immunity  Need of revaccinations in the farms  Affected by anti-infective compounds (Salmonella or E.coli).
  • 26.
    Novel technologies forpoultry vaccines  Immune complex vaccines  Vector vaccines  Vector “cassete” vaccines  Sub-unit vaccines  Gene-deleted vaccines  Reverse genetic vaccines
  • 27.
    Reverse genetic vaccines Sponsors SOURCE:Zoetis (Fort Dodge) leaflet
  • 28.
    Advantages & Shortcomings Improve the yield in SPF (or clean) eggs during the production of vaccines.  Possibility of producing vaccines closer to field virus (H5N1).  Less risks in case of problems during inactivation.  Differentiation between vaccinated and infected animals (DIVA) strategy. Sponsors  Interference with MDA in case of early administration  Immune response is limited to humoral antibodies  Tissue reactions after injection  Individual administration is time consuming and manpower demanding
  • 29.
  • 30.
    Vaccine technologies –Duration of immunity Source: Palya et al. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology,158, 105–115, 2014 0 20 40 60 80 100 3 4 6 10 15 25 33 40 55 72 %ofprotection Age of challenge (weeks) Clinical protection after challenge
  • 31.
    Vaccine technologies –Duration of immunity Sponsors 24 vaccination interventions 14 vaccination interventions
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Food for thoughts… Sponsors  The poultry industry is changing extremely quickly and it has brought new challenges to producers: Huge production complexes located in very densely populated areas; High stocking densities in the farms; High disease pressure; Poorly qualified workers, Pressure to reduce the use of antibiotics Pressure to improve the welfare etc
  • 34.
    Food for thoughts… Sponsors  Within this new context, new technology vaccines will help to overcome these challenges.  More efficacious and safer vaccines;  Applied in the hatcheries;  Long duration of immunity;  Able to reduce the shedding of the pathogens  Able to reduce the workload in the farms;  The poultry vaccines of the future should be what poultry producers will ask for!
  • 35.
    www.poultryindia.co.in | www.poultryprotein.com| www.poultryrecipes.co.in marcelo.paniago@ceva.com
  • 36.
    Marcelo Paniago Ceva SantéAnimale - France Director Global Veterinary Services - Poultry www. Ceva.com Email: marcelo.paniago@ceva.com Phone: +33 668 54 3931 Contact Sponsors