Anuman- An inference for helpful in diagnosis and treatment
peri ampullary carcinoma basic knowledges.pptx
1. Introduction
• Set of CA arise near ampulla of vater.
• Arise from Pancreatic duct, Bile duct, Ampulla and duodenum–
Although all are adenoCA.
• Share a common clinical presentation, they can be hard to distinguish
on cross sectional imaging, and when resectable, they are treated
with pancreaticoduodenectomy.
• Among all 4 Pancreatic ductal adenoCA is most common.
2. • In addition to these 4 types of adenocarcinomas, other less common
tumors arise in the periampullary region including neuroendocrine
tumors, acinar cell cancers, squamous cell carcinomas,
gastrointestinal tumors, lymphoma, and metastases from other sites.
3.
4. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
• 3rd leading cause of CA related death in US.
• In 70’s with M>F.
• Risk factors includes African-American, smoking, alcohol, obesity,
diabetes.
• 10% are genetic- BRCA2 (familial breast and ovarian cancer), PRSS1
(hereditary pancreatitis), p16 (familial atypical multiple mole and
melanoma), and HNPCC (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
5. Distal Bile Duct Cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma)
• 2nd M/C peri-ampullary CA.
• 30% of all CholangioCA.
• In 70’s.
• Risk factors for the development of cholangiocarcinoma include
sclerosing cholangitis, choledochal cysts, hepatolithiasis, and
infestation with liver flukes.
• The common etiologic factor with these conditions is continued long-
term chronic inflammation.
6. Adenocarcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater
• 3rd in frequency.
• Cause Obstructive jaundice early, hence detected early.
• Biologically less aggressive.
• Pancreatic, Biliary, Intestinal and Gastric type Histologically.
• Intestinal type being favourable prognosis.
7. Duodenal Adenocarcinoma
• Least common, M=F, 70’s
• Develop in background of polyps like colonic CA.
• In case of multiple polyps- FAP should be ruled out.
• Presents with GOO, SOJ depends on location.
• Usually present late.
• Better stage by stage prognosis as compared to Pancreatic and
CholangioCA counterpart.
8. Clinical Presentations
• Delay diagnosis, 80% presents in Metastatic or unresectable stage.
• The combination of jaundice (painless or painful) with pruritus,
acholic stools, and tea-colored urine in the absence of acute biliary
disease is a constellation of symptoms that should prompt the
suspicion of a periampullary tumor.
• Other relatively nonspecific symptoms such as Unintended wt loss,
malaise, fatigue, anorexia, indigestion, or early satiety are often noted
upon evaluation.
9. • Signs of pancreatic insufficiency (malabsorption, frequent fatty or
floating stool) would suggest obstruction of the main pancreatic duct,
whereas nausea and vomiting would suggest gastric outlet or
duodenal obstruction.
• A quite subtle sign, but one that is now known to be associated with
the ultimate diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies, is the rather
sudden development of adult-onset diabetes in previously healthy
patients in their sixth decade of life.
10. • Physical exam findings include scleral icterus, jaundice, and skin
excoriation from pruritus and scratching.
• The Courvoisier sign, noted by palpation of an enlarged gallbladder,
may be present without peritoneal signs.
• More advanced disease may include the findings of cachexia,
palpable left supraclavicular lymph nodes (Virchow node), palpable
periumbilical nodes (Sister Mary Joseph node), and palpable pelvic
metastatic disease on a rectal exam (Blumer shelf).
12. Imaging Evaluation
• A dedicated, fine-cut, 3phase pancreas protocol computed
tomography (CT) scan provides valuable information regarding local
(primarily vascular) and regional (primarily the liver as the most
common site of metastasis) spread of disease.
• In patients with CT contrast allergy- MRI with MRCP can be done.
• Cross sectional imaging is important for Extent, Stage and Potential
resectability of disease.
13.
14. • After ruling out metastasis, relation with nearby structures should be
established– IVC, PV, SMA, SMV, CT, HA.
• Abutment or involvement of above mentioned structures changes
management planning.
• More detail examination for relationship assessment can be done
using EUS.
• Possible FNA is a advantage often not required in every case except
for Neo-adjuvant, palliative care.
• PET-CT often used in combination but only role is to rule out
metastasis.
16. Biliary Decompression and Tissue Diagnosis
• ERC is another modality of use in setting of Jaundiced patient.
• Although not required in all cases where diagnosis in fairly obvious,
but can be used for supporting diagnosis and Brush cytology.
• Main findings on ERC includes- Abrupt cut off and Double duct sign.
• Other role is in stenting in setting of Periampullary CA.
• Main indications--- Before Cholangitis, Significant nutritional
deficiency, Neo-adjuvant, Palliative care.
• In resectable tumor- No role in jaundice between 2.3-14.6%, but can
be justified if surgery is delayed >7 days.
17.
18. Neoadjuvant Therapy
Arguments used for administration of neoadjuvant therapy include the following:
• High risk of undiagnosed stage IV disease (15%-30%);
• Conversion of locally unresectable disease to resectable disease (15%-40%);
• Preoperative radiation given in well-vascularized tissue may be more effective;
• Preoperative selection tool in patients with marginal candidacy for surgery from a
general medical standpoint;
• Increase in margin-negative resection rate;
• and most patients will receive some form of chemotherapy or radiation (up to
100%), as opposed to the large number of patients having to omit or delay
adjuvant therapy secondary to postoperative complications (up to 40%).
19. • Although NA CRT is most studied in resectable disease, but have no
well defined role in this setting.
• Defined role in Borderline resectable disease and unresectable
disease.
20. Borderline resectable
The Americas Hepatopancreatobiliary Association/Society for Surgery of the
Alimentary Tract/Society of Surgical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer
Network definition of borderline resectable pancreatic tumors includes the
following:
(1) venous involvement of the SMV/PV demonstrating tumor abutment,
encasement, short segment venous occlusion but with suitable vessel proximal and
distal to the area of the vessel involvement, for safe resection and reconstruction;
(2) gastroduodenal artery encasement up to the hepatic artery and short segment
encasement/direct tumor abutment of the hepatic artery with no extension to the
celiac trunk; and
(3) less than 180degree involvement of the SMA.
A more recent simplified definition by Cao et al used a tumor vein circumferential
interface grouping (TVI) system, as follows: no interface, <180 degrees of vessel
circumference, or >180 degree of vessel circumference or occlusion.
21. Common practice
• FOLFIRINOX, nab-paclitaxel, and gemcitabine based therapy is most
commonly used.
• Starts with Induction CT, with radiation of 50.4Gy in 1.8#.
• Evaluation afterward and if feasible surgery within 4-8weeks.
22. SURGICAL APPROACHES
• Diagnostic laparoscopy depending on institution protocol--- Advised
for bulky mass, CA body and tail, CA19-9 >200U/L.
• Exploration--- Assessment--- Resection--- Reconstruction.
23. Whipple’s Procedure
• Allen Oldfather Whipple; Kausch-Whipple
• Removal of HOP, Duodenum, part of Jejunum, Gall bladder, Distal
Stomach, Bile duct
• Reconstruction – PJ, HJ, GJ, + FJ
• 5-6 Hrs; 2% Mortality; 40% complications
23
29. 16 studies
1629 patients
No difference in
POPF Rates
Perivoliotis K et al. Int J Surg Oncol. 2017;2017:7526494
30. Palliative Operations
• End to side HJ.
• Gastro-Jejunostomy.
• Pain palliation--- Chemical/Surgical Splanchinectomy.
31. Some controversies
• Classical vs PPPD.
• SMA 1st.
• PJ vs PG.
• Lymphadenectomy.
• Associated liver resection.
• Splenectomy.
• Open vs Lap vs Robotics.
• Drain vs No drains.
32. Post op Complications
• Low rates in High volume centres--- 10-12 cases/year.
• Although postsurgical mortality in high-volume centers is low (0%-
3%), postoperative morbidity continues to remain high (30%-50%).
• The frequent serious postoperative complications are delayed gastric
emptying (15%-20%), pancreatic anastomotic leak (10%-20%), wound
infection (8%-10%), intra-abdominal (8%-10%) abscess, postoperative
hemorrhage (1%-8%), and pancreas fistula (5%).
33. The International Study Group of Pancreatic
Surgery
• Post pancreatectomy hemorrhage has been categorized by 3
important parameters: onset (before or after 24 hours from the time
of surgery), location (intra- or extraluminal), and severity (low or
high).
• Delayed gastric emptying has been defined as the inability to return
to a standard diet by the end of the first postoperative week.
Categories of A, B, and C have been established considering the
inability to tolerate solid food by 7, 14, or 21 days or nasogastric tube
requirement by 3, 7, or 14 days postoperatively or reinsertion of a
nasogastric tube between the days mentioned above.
34. • Postoperative pancreatic fistula has been defined as drain output of
any measurable volume of fluid on or after POD 3 with amylase
content greater than 3 times the serum amylase activity, with the
following grades established: A (no clinical impact), B (deviation from
normal postoperative course, percutaneous drain placement), or C
(reoperation or death).
35. Prognosis
• Only 15% have curative resection.
• Poor 10 year survival of 3.9%.
• A recent paper using a large population-based dataset identified
lymph node ratio (number of nodes harboring disease/total number
of nodes examined), margin status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and
pathologic T stage as being the top 4 variables associated with long-
term survival in pancreatic cancer patients.
36. Adjuvant Therapy
• Role is controversial--- Morbid surgery.
• If given--- After 1-2 months--- Often delayed due to complications.
• Phase 3 EORTC– RT+5FU CT vs Observation following curative intent
surgery– Similar 2 year OS and PFS.
• ESPAC 3- Showed no advantage of Gemcitabine over 5FU based
regimen.
• Although overall FOLFIRINOX is beneficial in Locally advanced setting.
• ESPAC-4 brings out beneficial role of addition of Capecitabine to
Gemcitabine regimen.
37. • Role of radiation in adjuvant setting is more controversial--- ESPAC-1
sowed detrimental effect of radiation in adjuvant setting.
• ABC 02 trial showed beneficial role of Cisplatin with Gemcitabine in
locally advanced and metastatic setting.
38.
39. Immunotherapy
• Defined role in Melanoma and RCC.
• Being studied in Pancreatic adenoCA.
• The purpose of immunotherapy is to activate both the cellular and
humoral immune components of the immune system.
• Patients with higher levels of CD4+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating
lymphocytes had longer overall survival after surgical resection.
• Since 1995, there have been 4 peptide vaccine trials, 2 recombinant
vaccine trials, 1 dendritic cell vaccine, 4 whole cell vaccines, and 1
combination immunotherapy trial--- results are not encouraging.
40. • Peri-ampullary adenoCA are immunotolerant.
• The future of pancreatic cancer immunotherapy lies in identifying
more tumor antigens, targeting multiple antigens, incorporating
checkpoint blockade inhibitors, and tumor microenvironment
manipulation.