SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 50
GALLBLADDER
TUMORS
TAWFIQ M. ALNAWAFLEH , MD , JBS,
MRCS, HPB SURGERY FELLOW
INTRODUCTION
• The most common of biliary tract malignancy. Sixth most
common cancer of GIT
• often discovered incidentally after cholecystectomy performed
for presumed benign disease.
• For surgeons whose specialty includes gallbladder cancer, it is
important to understand the outcome and limitations of surgical
resection so that a complete understanding of the risks and
benefits can be analyzed, presented to patients, and result in a
rational treatment strategy.
• overall 5-year survival of 20% with median survival of just 16
months for patients with resectable disease. For advanced,
untreated gallbladder cancer, the median survival is generally 2
to 5 months.
• Systemic chemotherapy remains limited in its effectiveness.
• Complete surgical removal of gallbladder cancer is the only
potentially curative therapy
EPIDEMIOLOGY
• Incidence of gallbladder cancer varies significantly by
geographic region and racial group.
• Women are affected two to four times more often than
men(higher rate of cholelithiasis and inflammation).
• Disease of older age with the incidence steadily
increasing to a plateau at about 60 years.
• Obesity, a risk factor for increased death rates from many
cancers, is similarly associated with increased risk of
developing gallbladder cancer.
• epidemiologic associations with gallbladder cancer
include : inflammatory bowel disease and primary
sclerosing cholangitis, history of typhoid infection, and
polyposis coli.
ETIOLOGY
• Most consistent etiologic factor in the development of
gallbladder cancer is cholelithiasis (90% of gallbladder cancer
specimens contain stones) and chronic inflammation .
• 75% to 90% occur in the setting of cholelithiasis.
• More stones, heavier stones, and increased stone volume in
the patients who had gallbladder cancer.
• Most patients with gallstones never develop cancer(incidence
of gallbladder cancer in the population of patients with stones is
(0.3% to 3%). and a definitive cause-and-effect relationship has
not been established.
• It is possible that stones and cancer share similar risk factors
or simply that stones prompt a radiologic workup or
cholecystectomy, increasing recognition in this group of
patients.
• Other epidemiologic associations, such as anomalous
pancreatobiliary duct junction, biliary-enteric fistulae, and
typhoid infection, also represent conditions in which the
mucosa of the gallbladder is exposed to the effects of
chronic inflammation.
• Bacterial colonization often accompanies chronic
cholecystitis, it has been proposed that bacteria may play
an important role in carcinogenesis.
• calcification in the wall (porcelain gallbladder) increase
risk of gallbladder cancer due long-standing inflammation.
• The risk of malignancy within a porcelain gallbladder was
previously reported to be extremely high (10%-50%);
modern series, however, have shown a much lower
incidence (<10%).
• type of calcification seems to be associated with the
degree of risk, with stippled calcification of the mucosa
representing a higher risk than diffuse intramural
calcification.
• In porcelain gallbladder: cholecystectomy in medically fit
patients is supported.
• The composition of bile in patients with gallbladder cancer
has been studied in attempts to identify carcinogenic
agents. Higher concentrations of free radical oxidation
products and secondary bile acids were found in
gallbladders harboring cancer compared with gallbladders
with gallstones alone.
• Some chemicals have been implicated in gallbladder
carcinogenesis, including methyldopa, oral contraceptives
, isoniazid , and occupational exposure in the rubber
industry. None of these associations has been definitively
proven.
pathology
• Similar to many GI malignancies, progression from
dysplasia to carcinoma in situ to frank invasive carcinoma
is seen in gallbladder epithelium.
• patients with multiple gallbladder polyps appear to have
no increased risk of malignancy (Unlike colorectal cancer
: adenoma to carcinoma progression).
• the incidence of malignancy in gallbladder polyps may be
higher in the patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
• polyps have been noted in 3% to 6% of patients
undergoing ultrasonography. Most are cholesterol polyps
with no malignant potential .The incidence of carcinoma in
nonadenomatous polyps (cholesterol polyps(most
common GB polyp) , inflammatory polyps, and
hyperplastic polyps) is close to zero.
• Early-stage gallbladder cancers are difficult to distinguish from
the findings typical of chronic cholecystitis(both often present
as a thickened gallbladder wall in the face of inflammation).
• The overall incidence of gallbladder cancer discovered during
cholecystectomy for presumed benign disease is less than 1%
• The gallbladder may become distended with tumor or become
contracted and collapsed.
• Tumors in the lower end of the gallbladder may obstruct the
neck or cystic duct, leading to hydrops.
• Approximately 60% of tumors originate from the fundus, 30%
from the body, and 10% from the neck.
• Advanced tumors of the neck, infundibulum, or cystic duct may
infiltrate the porta hepatis, resulting in major vascular invasion,
jaundice, and potentially hepatic atrophy. This presentation is
often indistinguishable from a hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
• Grosslly gallbladder cancer have been grouped into
infiltrative, nodular, combined nodular-infiltrative, papillary,
and combined papillary-infiltrative forms.
• Most tumors have an infiltrative pattern as at least part of
their presentation, causing diffuse thickening and
induration of the gallbladder wall. These types of tumors
seem to spread in a subserosal plane and can invade the
whole gallbladder wall and even invade into the porta
hepatis, causing jaundice from diffuse biliary involvement.
These types of tumor can also diffusely invade the liver.
HISTOLOGY
• 90% with gallbladder cancer are adenocarcinomas.
• Most gallbladder tumors can be characterized
histologically, but typically there is more than one
histologic pattern in each tumor. The only histologic
subtype that seems to have prognostic significance is the
papillary tumor, which has a better prognosis related to its
tendency to be less invasive .When papillary gallbladder
cancers become invasive, however, they can metastasize
and have a prognosis typical of the pathologic stage.
• Gallbladder cancers grouped into metaplastic and
nonmetaplastic types. types of metaplasia that are
precursors to malignancy in the gallbladder mucosa are
pseudopyloric and intestinal,The intestinal type has a
higher rate of carcinoma
• Histologically, gallbladder cancers are graded into four
categories ranging from well differentiated to poorly
differentiated. This differentiation does not have a
significant impact on prognosis.
• Although it is clear that gallbladder cancers can be
differentiated based on histologic type and grade, the
most important prognostic factor is the stage at
presentation, making grade and type prognostically
unimportant.
Pattern of Spread
• Gallbladder cancer spreads via lymphatics, hematogenously,
and into the peritoneal cavity or along biopsy or surgical wound
tracts.
• Invade and metastasize early; this attributable to the anatomy
of the gallbladder.(wall is thin, narrow lamina propria, and
single muscular layer, no serosal covering between the
gallbladder and liver.
• Tumors invade the liver at a thickness where in many organs a
second muscular layer would be encountered.
• The thin wall of the gallbladder may be responsible for early
hematogenous and lymphatic spread.
• Gallbladder tumors, once through the muscular layer, have
access to major lymphatic and vascular channels, providing
these tumors with early opportunities for dissemination.
• The only common extraabdominal site of distant
metastases is the lung, but lung metastases are rarely
seen in the absence of advanced intraabdominal disease.
• In an attempt to define sites of first recurrence after
complete resection : only 15% of patients developed
locoregional recurrence as the only site of recurrence,
and most (85%) had recurrence involving a distant site.
This finding shows the minimal potential utility of adjuvant
locoregional strategies and underscores the importance of
effective adjuvant systemic therapies.
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
• There are three common clinical scenarios for gallbladder
cancer: (1) identified by final pathology after routine
cholecystectomy; (2) discovered intraoperatively; and (3)
suspected before surgery
• high percentage of patients diagnosed with gallbladder cancer
after routine cholecystectomy for presumed benign gallbladder
disease, it is reasonable practice for the surgeon to inspect the
gallbladder mucosa at the completion of a cholecystectomy.
• try to remove the gallbladder intact (without perforation) if there
is any suspicion of gallbladder cancer.
• Frozen-section analysis should be used to examine any
suspicious areas if further surgery is planned, or if these
biopsies would substantially change the stage of disease.
• Asymptomatic in early stages.
• Constant right upper quadrant pain
• Weight loss, anorexia, and particularly jaundice are signs
of advanced disease.
• The presence of a palpable mass also is clearly an
ominous finding and predicts a high rate of irresectability
and advanced disease.
• LABS : anemia, hypoalbuminemia, leukocytosis, and
elevated alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin
• Tumor markers: CEA, CA19-9 : serum tumor markers are
of minimal clinical value compared with clinical
awareness, helpful in following a patient for recurrence.
RADIOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
• US : excellent imaging modality for the gallbladder, good
modality for evaluating the direct extension of gallbladder
cancer, limited, in identifying lymph node metastases in
pericholedochal and peripancreatic nodes. Because most
cases are advanced, the most common finding in
gallbladder cancer is a heterogeneous mass replacing all
or part of the gallbladder.
• CT : most common finding is a mass involving all or part
of the gallbladder. Assess local extent of disease and
whether distant metastases are present. Assessment of
regional and distant lymph nodes(regional nodal status
can vary, This may be improved by using criteria such as
size greater than 1 cm and a ringlike heterogeneous
enhancement (80% accuracy)).
• In CT : false-negative examinations continue to be a
problem because many involved lymph nodes can be
small with minimal tumor in them.
• CT is 71% to 84% accurate in T-staging gallbladder
cancer. The overall accuracy improved from 72% to 85%
when multiplanar reconstructions were added to
conventional axial imaging.
• PET: differentiate between benign and malignant tumors
and diagnose extrahepatic spread. limited in
differentiating between benign inflammatory states and
malignancy. more accurate in diagnosing metastatic
disease than CT scan. more useful in evaluating primary
gallbladder cancer rather than recurrent disease.
• Mid–bile duct stricture, Mirizzi syndrome, distortion, or
nonfilling of the segment V or VI bile ducts can be caused
by gallbladder tumors. (assessed by CT or MRI)
• Invasive cholangiography(PTC OR ERCP) : part of the
palliation of advanced gallbladder cancer(stenting).
PREOPERATIVE PATHOLOGIC
DIAGNOSIS
• Unnecessary.
• Dangerous in patients with disease that is amenable to
resection (tendency to seed the peritoneum, biopsy tracts, and
surgical wounds).
• Negative biopsy result cannot be trusted because of significant
false-negative rates.
• Unwise to perform a diagnostic cholecystectomy to make the
diagnosis.
• surgeon and patient also must be prepared for the possibility of
performing a liver resection for benign disease.
• Unresectable or metastatic disease, a percutaneous biopsy
has an accuracy of almost 90%, and the falsepositive rate is
negligible
• Bile cytology: Sensitivity of bile cytology has been
reported to be approximately 75%. Done only if the
patient need PTC or ERCP . deliberate attempt to make
the diagnosis this way is unwarranted.
STAGING
• The layers of the gallbladder consist of mucosa, a
muscular layer, perimuscular connective tissue, and
serosa on one side (serosa is lacking on the side of the
gallbladder embedded in the liver).GB lacks a
submucosal layer.
• It is recommended that at least six lymph nodes be
harvested and evaluated, all nodes removed at operation
should be assessed for metastasis.
AJCC 8TH edition changes
***There is no longer a distinction between T3 and T4 tumors based on
the depth of liver invasion.
Staging Laparoscopy
• Two studies demonstrated that DL could prevent
nontherapeutic laparotomy in 33% to 55% of patients with
metastatic disease. Laparoscopy was more accurate than
CT in detecting peritoneal disease in patients with locally
advanced tumors, suggesting that patients with T3 and T4
lesions may benefit from DL prior to surgery.
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
• 1-Benign Polyps:
• current practice recommendations are to perform lap.
cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps greater than 1 cm in
size. (>0.8 cm in PSC )
• IF < 1 cm : Ultrasound follow-up at 12-month intervals for 2 to 3
years, then consideration of no additional imaging if the polyp
is stable and there are no new or suspicious clinical symptoms.
• WHY lap not open ? : (1) the overall low risk of malignancy, (2)
simple cholecystectomy is curative for T1a tumors, (3)
laparoscopically resected early-stage tumors do not appear to
have a worse outcome if a definitive resection is performed
subsequently and there is no perforation of the gallbladder
2-GB Ca Incidentally Discovered
During or After Routine Cholecystectomy
• If cancer diagnosed by frozen section during surgery a curative
resection or no further dissection then transfer to experienced
hepatobiliary surgeon (This strategy does not appear to affect
outcomes).
• If cancer diagnosed after cholecystectomy:
• prior to undertaking a second operation, high-quality crosssectional
imaging (CT/MRI) should be obtained to appropriately stage the
disease.
• Postoperative inflammatory changes may be indistinguishable from
tumour and thus may necessitate bile duct resection or a more
aggressive hepatic resection to ensure complete tumour eradication.
• Re-resection is recommended for all patients who are medically fit
with T1b or greater level of invasion.
• Routine resection of the bile duct has not been associated with
improvements in survival but is generally required for a complete
resection in patients with a positive cystic duct stump
margin(examined with frozen section).
Liver Resection
• If the tumor invade hepatic inflow vascular structures, an
extended right hepatectomy may be necessary to clear all
tumor, also consider systemic chemotherapy in advance.
• The goal of the liver resection is to ensure a margin of
resection of approximately 1 to 2 cm because there is no
serosal surface on the liver side of the gallbladder.
• The standard resection is an anatomic resection of
segments IVb and V, but it is possible to do a smaller
wedge resection for early-stage
Lymph Node Dissection
• The most common site of spread from gallbladder cancer
is to the periportal lymph nodes (LN) and then to
aortocaval LN. Celiac LN can also be involved.
• Long-term survival has not been demonstrated for
patients who undergo resection in the setting of positive
extraregional (para-aortic, celiac, or SMA) lymph nodes
(N2).
• The most recent AHPBA/SSAT/SSO/ASCO Consensus
Conference published a consensus statement
recommending aortocaval, retropancreatic and/or coeliac
LN sampling at the initiation of intended resection for
gallbladder cancer. If these LN are positive on frozen
section, there is no benefit to proceeding with radical
resection.
• Lymphatic drainage of
the gallbladder as
studied by dye
injections. When injected
into the lymphatics of the
gallbladder, dye was
shown never to ascend
into the proximal porta
hepatis lymphatics.
• Lymphatic channels from
the gallbladder lead first
to the cystic and
pericholedochal nodes.
• With locally advanced lesions it has been found that on
progression of T stage from T2 to T4, nodal and distant
metastases increased from 16% to 79% and from 33% to
69%, respectively.
• The presence of any nodal disease is associated with
poor survival.
PORT SITE RECURRENCES
• port site seeding after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
• exacerbated by spillage of bile or stones inside the
peritoneal cavity.
• it is rare for port site recurrences to occur as the sole site
of disease.
• Given that port site recurrence is more a marker of
aggressive disease, the practice does not include empiric
resection of port sites during reexploration for gallbladder
cancer.
Obstructive jaundice
• Obstructive jaundice is a poor prognostic indicator and a
marker of advanced disease in patients with gallbladder
cancer.
• Patients presenting with obstructive jaundice and a
gallbladder malignancy have tumour involvement of the
porta hepatis by either direct extension of the tumour,
diffuse invasion of the porta hepatis or extensive nodal
disease.
• In 240 patients at MSKCC who presented with gallbladder
cancer, 82 (34%) were jaundiced and were more likely to
have advanced-stage disease; only six patients
underwent resection with curative intent, and only four
had an R0 resection.
Adjuvant therapy
• Sixty-six per cent of patients with gallbladder cancers who
underwent a potentially curative resection recurred within
a median follow-up of 24 months.
• Only 15% of patients developed a locoregional recurrence
as the first site of failure, while the majority of patients
(85%) had recurrence that involved a distant site.
• Thus, local therapies targeted at locoregional disease,
such as radiotherapy, are unlikely to significantly impact
the course of this disease, further emphasising the
importance of developing effective systemic adjuvant
therapies.
• One phase III multi-institutional trial of adjuvant chemotherapy
was performed in Japan as reported by Takada et al.103 It
should be noted that this trial included 508 patients with biliary
and pancreatic cancers. However, on subset analysis, this
study included 140 patients with gallbladder cancer who were
randomised to undergo surgical resection alone or resection
plus adjuvant mitomycin and 5FU. In considering only the
patients with gallbladder cancer, the actuarial 5-year disease-
free survival favoured the adjuvant chemotherapy group in
comparison to the surgeryalone group (20.3% vs 11.6%). From
these data, it is reasonable to offer adjuvant chemotherapy with
5FU and mitomycin; however, no consensus has been reached
regarding routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy.
• The contemporary drug gemcitabine was compared to
best supportive care and 5-FU in a three-arm trial for
patients with unresectable gallbladder cancer.
Gemcitabine significantly improved median overall
survival compared to both 5-FU and best supportive care.
• Currently, gemcitabine-based regimens, often combined
with a platinum agent, have become the most common
choice for treating gallbladder cancer.
• It is reasonable to consider patients with high-risk lesions
(i.e., T4 tumors, node positive, R1 resection) for both
neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy and to offer
consultation with a medical oncologist to discuss
treatment options.
• Treatment efficacy demonstrated in the unresectable or
metastatic patient may not translate into improved
outcomes when used as an adjuvant to resection.
PALLIATIVE MANAGEMENT
• Most treatment options in patients with gallbladder cancer
are palliative because most patients are unresectable at
presentation.
• The most common symptoms to palliate include pain,
jaundice, and bowel obstruction.
• Palliation of jaundice: endoscopic or percutaneous
interventions are the preferred approach for palliation and
minimizing morbidity. These palliative procedures were
successful in alleviating pruritus, but there was no
improvement in quality of-life.
• The high risk of morbidity and mortality precludes
recommending these treatments in the absence of
symptoms or a specific reason to treat jaundice, such as
allowing administration of chemotherapy.
• Intestinal bypass can also be performed in patients with
symptomatic bowel obstruction. Percutaneous feeding
tubes or drains and endoscopic stents are favored over
surgical bypass because of the extremely poor prognosis.
• Chemotherapy has been used to palliate unresectable
disease but often offers little benefit.
• Clinical trials ofgemcitabine and oxaliplatin have showed
response rates of 40% to 50%
• Radiation therapy may be an effective palliative therapy
for locally advanced disease.
• Radiation therapy is generally well tolerated, may have an
impact on local symptoms, and is usually combined with
chemotherapy
Key Points:
• In gallbladder cancer, a cholecystectomy should be performed
for adenomatous polyps >1 cm, or those that are smaller but
growing and changing in character. Cholesterol polyps and
• Adenomyomatosis are not premalignant conditions.
• Complete surgical resection is the goal, whether the diagnosis
is made preoperatively, intraoperatively or after a non-curative
laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
• In patients with invasion into the common bile duct,
consideration should be given to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
prior to surgical exploration in an attempt to best select patients
for potentially curative resection.
• Obstructive jaundice in the setting of gallbladder carcinoma
portends poor survival and systemic therapy should be
considered prior to entertaining surgical resection.

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Carcinoma of the GI Tract
Carcinoma of the GI TractCarcinoma of the GI Tract
Carcinoma of the GI Tract
 
Cholecystitis and cholelithiasis
Cholecystitis and cholelithiasis Cholecystitis and cholelithiasis
Cholecystitis and cholelithiasis
 
Gall Bladder Carcinoma
Gall Bladder CarcinomaGall Bladder Carcinoma
Gall Bladder Carcinoma
 
cancer esophagus
cancer esophaguscancer esophagus
cancer esophagus
 
Liver cancer
Liver cancerLiver cancer
Liver cancer
 
Renal cell carcinoma
Renal cell carcinomaRenal cell carcinoma
Renal cell carcinoma
 
5. COLORECTAL CANCER
5. COLORECTAL CANCER5. COLORECTAL CANCER
5. COLORECTAL CANCER
 
Carcinoma of esophagus
Carcinoma of esophagusCarcinoma of esophagus
Carcinoma of esophagus
 
Colon cancer
Colon cancer Colon cancer
Colon cancer
 
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal cancerColorectal cancer
Colorectal cancer
 
Gall bladder cancer management
Gall bladder cancer managementGall bladder cancer management
Gall bladder cancer management
 
Stomach Cancer
Stomach CancerStomach Cancer
Stomach Cancer
 
Liver abscess
Liver abscessLiver abscess
Liver abscess
 
Esophageal ca
Esophageal caEsophageal ca
Esophageal ca
 
Liver tomour
Liver tomourLiver tomour
Liver tomour
 
Liver Cancer Eng
Liver Cancer EngLiver Cancer Eng
Liver Cancer Eng
 
Kidney cancer
Kidney cancerKidney cancer
Kidney cancer
 
Liver abscess
Liver abscessLiver abscess
Liver abscess
 
Liver tumours.pptx
Liver tumours.pptxLiver tumours.pptx
Liver tumours.pptx
 
Esophagus cancer
Esophagus cancerEsophagus cancer
Esophagus cancer
 

Similar to Gallbladder tumors

Colon cancer in 2018
Colon cancer in 2018Colon cancer in 2018
Colon cancer in 2018Ali Musavi
 
Carcinoma stomach.pptx
Carcinoma stomach.pptxCarcinoma stomach.pptx
Carcinoma stomach.pptxUmmayKhatun1
 
Colo-rectal Carcinoma at a glance !!!
Colo-rectal Carcinoma at  a glance !!!Colo-rectal Carcinoma at  a glance !!!
Colo-rectal Carcinoma at a glance !!!Suman Baral
 
Rathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptx
Rathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptxRathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptx
Rathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptxAadarsh Kavoram
 
Carcinoma Cervix.pptx
Carcinoma Cervix.pptxCarcinoma Cervix.pptx
Carcinoma Cervix.pptxAeyshaBegum
 
2015.surgical treatment of colon cancer
2015.surgical treatment of colon cancer2015.surgical treatment of colon cancer
2015.surgical treatment of colon cancerAleksandar Aničić
 
Carcinoma Colon (large intestine ).pptx
Carcinoma Colon (large intestine  ).pptxCarcinoma Colon (large intestine  ).pptx
Carcinoma Colon (large intestine ).pptxDr Ashwini kumar
 
Colon cancer.ppt.pptx
Colon cancer.ppt.pptxColon cancer.ppt.pptx
Colon cancer.ppt.pptxBijo10
 
Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)
Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)
Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)Dr.Manojit Sarkar
 
COLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptx
COLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptxCOLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptx
COLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptxKingsleyMagbei
 
Gastric cancer
Gastric cancerGastric cancer
Gastric cancerbbxoxo
 
CARCINOMA STOMACH.pptx
CARCINOMA STOMACH.pptxCARCINOMA STOMACH.pptx
CARCINOMA STOMACH.pptxarunabhasinha2
 
Surgical_Management_CCC.pdf
Surgical_Management_CCC.pdfSurgical_Management_CCC.pdf
Surgical_Management_CCC.pdfChrysi Tsiouri
 

Similar to Gallbladder tumors (20)

Colon cancer in 2018
Colon cancer in 2018Colon cancer in 2018
Colon cancer in 2018
 
gastriccancer
gastriccancergastriccancer
gastriccancer
 
Carcinoma stomach.pptx
Carcinoma stomach.pptxCarcinoma stomach.pptx
Carcinoma stomach.pptx
 
Git 4th GC18.
Git 4th GC18.Git 4th GC18.
Git 4th GC18.
 
Colo-rectal Carcinoma at a glance !!!
Colo-rectal Carcinoma at  a glance !!!Colo-rectal Carcinoma at  a glance !!!
Colo-rectal Carcinoma at a glance !!!
 
Gastric carcinoma
Gastric carcinoma Gastric carcinoma
Gastric carcinoma
 
Rathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptx
Rathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptxRathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptx
Rathod Gastric Cancer Presentation final.pptx
 
Carcinoma Cervix.pptx
Carcinoma Cervix.pptxCarcinoma Cervix.pptx
Carcinoma Cervix.pptx
 
2015.surgical treatment of colon cancer
2015.surgical treatment of colon cancer2015.surgical treatment of colon cancer
2015.surgical treatment of colon cancer
 
Carcinoma Colon (large intestine ).pptx
Carcinoma Colon (large intestine  ).pptxCarcinoma Colon (large intestine  ).pptx
Carcinoma Colon (large intestine ).pptx
 
Gastric cancer
Gastric cancerGastric cancer
Gastric cancer
 
Colon cancer.ppt.pptx
Colon cancer.ppt.pptxColon cancer.ppt.pptx
Colon cancer.ppt.pptx
 
Colon cancer.ppt.pptx
Colon cancer.ppt.pptxColon cancer.ppt.pptx
Colon cancer.ppt.pptx
 
Breast diseases
Breast diseasesBreast diseases
Breast diseases
 
Oesophageal carcinoma
Oesophageal carcinomaOesophageal carcinoma
Oesophageal carcinoma
 
Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)
Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)
Colorectal cancer.pptx by -MANOJIT(MS)
 
COLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptx
COLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptxCOLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptx
COLORECTAL CANCER by Dr. Oyintonbra Koroye pptx
 
Gastric cancer
Gastric cancerGastric cancer
Gastric cancer
 
CARCINOMA STOMACH.pptx
CARCINOMA STOMACH.pptxCARCINOMA STOMACH.pptx
CARCINOMA STOMACH.pptx
 
Surgical_Management_CCC.pdf
Surgical_Management_CCC.pdfSurgical_Management_CCC.pdf
Surgical_Management_CCC.pdf
 

Recently uploaded

Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetChandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetpriyashah722354
 
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...gragteena
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF ...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF  ...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF  ...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF ...Gfnyt.com
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Roomdivyansh0kumar0
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171Call Girls Service Gurgaon
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhVip call girls In Chandigarh
 
Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...
Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...
Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...Call Girls Noida
 
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar SumanCall Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar SumanCall Girls Service Chandigarh Ayushi
 
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In RaipurCall Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipurgragmanisha42
 
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near MeVIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Memriyagarg453
 
Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...
Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...
Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...Niamh verma
 
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...gurkirankumar98700
 
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...Niamh verma
 
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in UdaipurUdaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipurseemahedar019
 
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptxBasics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptxAyush Gupta
 
Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.
Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.
Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.ktanvi103
 
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In LudhianaHot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In LudhianaRussian Call Girls in Ludhiana
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...Gfnyt.com
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknowgragteena
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetChandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
Call Girls Service Charbagh { Lucknow Call Girls Service 9548273370 } Book me...
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF ...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF  ...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF  ...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Jaispreet Call Girl Services in Jaipur QRYPCF ...
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
 
Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...
Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...
Vip sexy Call Girls Service In Sector 137,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Ser...
 
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar SumanCall Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
 
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In RaipurCall Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
Call Girl Raipur 📲 9999965857 ヅ10k NiGhT Call Girls In Raipur
 
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near MeVIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
 
Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...
Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...
Call Girls Amritsar 💯Call Us 🔝 8725944379 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Amri...
 
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8923113531 ...
 
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Gori WhatsApp ❤7710465962 VIP Call Girls Chandi...
 
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
 
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in UdaipurUdaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
Udaipur Call Girls 📲 9999965857 Call Girl in Udaipur
 
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptxBasics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
 
Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.
Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.
Call Now ☎ 9999965857 !! Call Girls in Hauz Khas Escort Service Delhi N.C.R.
 
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In LudhianaHot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
 

Gallbladder tumors

  • 1. GALLBLADDER TUMORS TAWFIQ M. ALNAWAFLEH , MD , JBS, MRCS, HPB SURGERY FELLOW
  • 2. INTRODUCTION • The most common of biliary tract malignancy. Sixth most common cancer of GIT • often discovered incidentally after cholecystectomy performed for presumed benign disease. • For surgeons whose specialty includes gallbladder cancer, it is important to understand the outcome and limitations of surgical resection so that a complete understanding of the risks and benefits can be analyzed, presented to patients, and result in a rational treatment strategy. • overall 5-year survival of 20% with median survival of just 16 months for patients with resectable disease. For advanced, untreated gallbladder cancer, the median survival is generally 2 to 5 months. • Systemic chemotherapy remains limited in its effectiveness. • Complete surgical removal of gallbladder cancer is the only potentially curative therapy
  • 3. EPIDEMIOLOGY • Incidence of gallbladder cancer varies significantly by geographic region and racial group. • Women are affected two to four times more often than men(higher rate of cholelithiasis and inflammation). • Disease of older age with the incidence steadily increasing to a plateau at about 60 years. • Obesity, a risk factor for increased death rates from many cancers, is similarly associated with increased risk of developing gallbladder cancer. • epidemiologic associations with gallbladder cancer include : inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis, history of typhoid infection, and polyposis coli.
  • 4. ETIOLOGY • Most consistent etiologic factor in the development of gallbladder cancer is cholelithiasis (90% of gallbladder cancer specimens contain stones) and chronic inflammation . • 75% to 90% occur in the setting of cholelithiasis. • More stones, heavier stones, and increased stone volume in the patients who had gallbladder cancer. • Most patients with gallstones never develop cancer(incidence of gallbladder cancer in the population of patients with stones is (0.3% to 3%). and a definitive cause-and-effect relationship has not been established. • It is possible that stones and cancer share similar risk factors or simply that stones prompt a radiologic workup or cholecystectomy, increasing recognition in this group of patients.
  • 5. • Other epidemiologic associations, such as anomalous pancreatobiliary duct junction, biliary-enteric fistulae, and typhoid infection, also represent conditions in which the mucosa of the gallbladder is exposed to the effects of chronic inflammation. • Bacterial colonization often accompanies chronic cholecystitis, it has been proposed that bacteria may play an important role in carcinogenesis.
  • 6. • calcification in the wall (porcelain gallbladder) increase risk of gallbladder cancer due long-standing inflammation. • The risk of malignancy within a porcelain gallbladder was previously reported to be extremely high (10%-50%); modern series, however, have shown a much lower incidence (<10%). • type of calcification seems to be associated with the degree of risk, with stippled calcification of the mucosa representing a higher risk than diffuse intramural calcification. • In porcelain gallbladder: cholecystectomy in medically fit patients is supported.
  • 7. • The composition of bile in patients with gallbladder cancer has been studied in attempts to identify carcinogenic agents. Higher concentrations of free radical oxidation products and secondary bile acids were found in gallbladders harboring cancer compared with gallbladders with gallstones alone. • Some chemicals have been implicated in gallbladder carcinogenesis, including methyldopa, oral contraceptives , isoniazid , and occupational exposure in the rubber industry. None of these associations has been definitively proven.
  • 8. pathology • Similar to many GI malignancies, progression from dysplasia to carcinoma in situ to frank invasive carcinoma is seen in gallbladder epithelium. • patients with multiple gallbladder polyps appear to have no increased risk of malignancy (Unlike colorectal cancer : adenoma to carcinoma progression). • the incidence of malignancy in gallbladder polyps may be higher in the patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis. • polyps have been noted in 3% to 6% of patients undergoing ultrasonography. Most are cholesterol polyps with no malignant potential .The incidence of carcinoma in nonadenomatous polyps (cholesterol polyps(most common GB polyp) , inflammatory polyps, and hyperplastic polyps) is close to zero.
  • 9. • Early-stage gallbladder cancers are difficult to distinguish from the findings typical of chronic cholecystitis(both often present as a thickened gallbladder wall in the face of inflammation). • The overall incidence of gallbladder cancer discovered during cholecystectomy for presumed benign disease is less than 1% • The gallbladder may become distended with tumor or become contracted and collapsed. • Tumors in the lower end of the gallbladder may obstruct the neck or cystic duct, leading to hydrops. • Approximately 60% of tumors originate from the fundus, 30% from the body, and 10% from the neck. • Advanced tumors of the neck, infundibulum, or cystic duct may infiltrate the porta hepatis, resulting in major vascular invasion, jaundice, and potentially hepatic atrophy. This presentation is often indistinguishable from a hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
  • 10. • Grosslly gallbladder cancer have been grouped into infiltrative, nodular, combined nodular-infiltrative, papillary, and combined papillary-infiltrative forms. • Most tumors have an infiltrative pattern as at least part of their presentation, causing diffuse thickening and induration of the gallbladder wall. These types of tumors seem to spread in a subserosal plane and can invade the whole gallbladder wall and even invade into the porta hepatis, causing jaundice from diffuse biliary involvement. These types of tumor can also diffusely invade the liver.
  • 11. HISTOLOGY • 90% with gallbladder cancer are adenocarcinomas. • Most gallbladder tumors can be characterized histologically, but typically there is more than one histologic pattern in each tumor. The only histologic subtype that seems to have prognostic significance is the papillary tumor, which has a better prognosis related to its tendency to be less invasive .When papillary gallbladder cancers become invasive, however, they can metastasize and have a prognosis typical of the pathologic stage. • Gallbladder cancers grouped into metaplastic and nonmetaplastic types. types of metaplasia that are precursors to malignancy in the gallbladder mucosa are pseudopyloric and intestinal,The intestinal type has a higher rate of carcinoma
  • 12. • Histologically, gallbladder cancers are graded into four categories ranging from well differentiated to poorly differentiated. This differentiation does not have a significant impact on prognosis. • Although it is clear that gallbladder cancers can be differentiated based on histologic type and grade, the most important prognostic factor is the stage at presentation, making grade and type prognostically unimportant.
  • 13.
  • 14. Pattern of Spread • Gallbladder cancer spreads via lymphatics, hematogenously, and into the peritoneal cavity or along biopsy or surgical wound tracts. • Invade and metastasize early; this attributable to the anatomy of the gallbladder.(wall is thin, narrow lamina propria, and single muscular layer, no serosal covering between the gallbladder and liver. • Tumors invade the liver at a thickness where in many organs a second muscular layer would be encountered. • The thin wall of the gallbladder may be responsible for early hematogenous and lymphatic spread. • Gallbladder tumors, once through the muscular layer, have access to major lymphatic and vascular channels, providing these tumors with early opportunities for dissemination.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17. • The only common extraabdominal site of distant metastases is the lung, but lung metastases are rarely seen in the absence of advanced intraabdominal disease. • In an attempt to define sites of first recurrence after complete resection : only 15% of patients developed locoregional recurrence as the only site of recurrence, and most (85%) had recurrence involving a distant site. This finding shows the minimal potential utility of adjuvant locoregional strategies and underscores the importance of effective adjuvant systemic therapies.
  • 18. CLINICAL PRESENTATION • There are three common clinical scenarios for gallbladder cancer: (1) identified by final pathology after routine cholecystectomy; (2) discovered intraoperatively; and (3) suspected before surgery • high percentage of patients diagnosed with gallbladder cancer after routine cholecystectomy for presumed benign gallbladder disease, it is reasonable practice for the surgeon to inspect the gallbladder mucosa at the completion of a cholecystectomy. • try to remove the gallbladder intact (without perforation) if there is any suspicion of gallbladder cancer. • Frozen-section analysis should be used to examine any suspicious areas if further surgery is planned, or if these biopsies would substantially change the stage of disease.
  • 19. • Asymptomatic in early stages. • Constant right upper quadrant pain • Weight loss, anorexia, and particularly jaundice are signs of advanced disease. • The presence of a palpable mass also is clearly an ominous finding and predicts a high rate of irresectability and advanced disease. • LABS : anemia, hypoalbuminemia, leukocytosis, and elevated alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin • Tumor markers: CEA, CA19-9 : serum tumor markers are of minimal clinical value compared with clinical awareness, helpful in following a patient for recurrence.
  • 20. RADIOLOGIC INVESTIGATION • US : excellent imaging modality for the gallbladder, good modality for evaluating the direct extension of gallbladder cancer, limited, in identifying lymph node metastases in pericholedochal and peripancreatic nodes. Because most cases are advanced, the most common finding in gallbladder cancer is a heterogeneous mass replacing all or part of the gallbladder. • CT : most common finding is a mass involving all or part of the gallbladder. Assess local extent of disease and whether distant metastases are present. Assessment of regional and distant lymph nodes(regional nodal status can vary, This may be improved by using criteria such as size greater than 1 cm and a ringlike heterogeneous enhancement (80% accuracy)).
  • 21. • In CT : false-negative examinations continue to be a problem because many involved lymph nodes can be small with minimal tumor in them. • CT is 71% to 84% accurate in T-staging gallbladder cancer. The overall accuracy improved from 72% to 85% when multiplanar reconstructions were added to conventional axial imaging. • PET: differentiate between benign and malignant tumors and diagnose extrahepatic spread. limited in differentiating between benign inflammatory states and malignancy. more accurate in diagnosing metastatic disease than CT scan. more useful in evaluating primary gallbladder cancer rather than recurrent disease.
  • 22.
  • 23. • Mid–bile duct stricture, Mirizzi syndrome, distortion, or nonfilling of the segment V or VI bile ducts can be caused by gallbladder tumors. (assessed by CT or MRI) • Invasive cholangiography(PTC OR ERCP) : part of the palliation of advanced gallbladder cancer(stenting).
  • 24. PREOPERATIVE PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS • Unnecessary. • Dangerous in patients with disease that is amenable to resection (tendency to seed the peritoneum, biopsy tracts, and surgical wounds). • Negative biopsy result cannot be trusted because of significant false-negative rates. • Unwise to perform a diagnostic cholecystectomy to make the diagnosis. • surgeon and patient also must be prepared for the possibility of performing a liver resection for benign disease. • Unresectable or metastatic disease, a percutaneous biopsy has an accuracy of almost 90%, and the falsepositive rate is negligible
  • 25. • Bile cytology: Sensitivity of bile cytology has been reported to be approximately 75%. Done only if the patient need PTC or ERCP . deliberate attempt to make the diagnosis this way is unwarranted.
  • 26. STAGING • The layers of the gallbladder consist of mucosa, a muscular layer, perimuscular connective tissue, and serosa on one side (serosa is lacking on the side of the gallbladder embedded in the liver).GB lacks a submucosal layer. • It is recommended that at least six lymph nodes be harvested and evaluated, all nodes removed at operation should be assessed for metastasis.
  • 27. AJCC 8TH edition changes ***There is no longer a distinction between T3 and T4 tumors based on the depth of liver invasion.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32. Staging Laparoscopy • Two studies demonstrated that DL could prevent nontherapeutic laparotomy in 33% to 55% of patients with metastatic disease. Laparoscopy was more accurate than CT in detecting peritoneal disease in patients with locally advanced tumors, suggesting that patients with T3 and T4 lesions may benefit from DL prior to surgery.
  • 33. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT • 1-Benign Polyps: • current practice recommendations are to perform lap. cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps greater than 1 cm in size. (>0.8 cm in PSC ) • IF < 1 cm : Ultrasound follow-up at 12-month intervals for 2 to 3 years, then consideration of no additional imaging if the polyp is stable and there are no new or suspicious clinical symptoms. • WHY lap not open ? : (1) the overall low risk of malignancy, (2) simple cholecystectomy is curative for T1a tumors, (3) laparoscopically resected early-stage tumors do not appear to have a worse outcome if a definitive resection is performed subsequently and there is no perforation of the gallbladder
  • 34. 2-GB Ca Incidentally Discovered During or After Routine Cholecystectomy • If cancer diagnosed by frozen section during surgery a curative resection or no further dissection then transfer to experienced hepatobiliary surgeon (This strategy does not appear to affect outcomes). • If cancer diagnosed after cholecystectomy: • prior to undertaking a second operation, high-quality crosssectional imaging (CT/MRI) should be obtained to appropriately stage the disease. • Postoperative inflammatory changes may be indistinguishable from tumour and thus may necessitate bile duct resection or a more aggressive hepatic resection to ensure complete tumour eradication. • Re-resection is recommended for all patients who are medically fit with T1b or greater level of invasion. • Routine resection of the bile duct has not been associated with improvements in survival but is generally required for a complete resection in patients with a positive cystic duct stump margin(examined with frozen section).
  • 35.
  • 36. Liver Resection • If the tumor invade hepatic inflow vascular structures, an extended right hepatectomy may be necessary to clear all tumor, also consider systemic chemotherapy in advance. • The goal of the liver resection is to ensure a margin of resection of approximately 1 to 2 cm because there is no serosal surface on the liver side of the gallbladder. • The standard resection is an anatomic resection of segments IVb and V, but it is possible to do a smaller wedge resection for early-stage
  • 37. Lymph Node Dissection • The most common site of spread from gallbladder cancer is to the periportal lymph nodes (LN) and then to aortocaval LN. Celiac LN can also be involved. • Long-term survival has not been demonstrated for patients who undergo resection in the setting of positive extraregional (para-aortic, celiac, or SMA) lymph nodes (N2). • The most recent AHPBA/SSAT/SSO/ASCO Consensus Conference published a consensus statement recommending aortocaval, retropancreatic and/or coeliac LN sampling at the initiation of intended resection for gallbladder cancer. If these LN are positive on frozen section, there is no benefit to proceeding with radical resection.
  • 38. • Lymphatic drainage of the gallbladder as studied by dye injections. When injected into the lymphatics of the gallbladder, dye was shown never to ascend into the proximal porta hepatis lymphatics. • Lymphatic channels from the gallbladder lead first to the cystic and pericholedochal nodes.
  • 39. • With locally advanced lesions it has been found that on progression of T stage from T2 to T4, nodal and distant metastases increased from 16% to 79% and from 33% to 69%, respectively. • The presence of any nodal disease is associated with poor survival.
  • 40.
  • 41. PORT SITE RECURRENCES • port site seeding after laparoscopic cholecystectomy • exacerbated by spillage of bile or stones inside the peritoneal cavity. • it is rare for port site recurrences to occur as the sole site of disease. • Given that port site recurrence is more a marker of aggressive disease, the practice does not include empiric resection of port sites during reexploration for gallbladder cancer.
  • 42. Obstructive jaundice • Obstructive jaundice is a poor prognostic indicator and a marker of advanced disease in patients with gallbladder cancer. • Patients presenting with obstructive jaundice and a gallbladder malignancy have tumour involvement of the porta hepatis by either direct extension of the tumour, diffuse invasion of the porta hepatis or extensive nodal disease. • In 240 patients at MSKCC who presented with gallbladder cancer, 82 (34%) were jaundiced and were more likely to have advanced-stage disease; only six patients underwent resection with curative intent, and only four had an R0 resection.
  • 43. Adjuvant therapy • Sixty-six per cent of patients with gallbladder cancers who underwent a potentially curative resection recurred within a median follow-up of 24 months. • Only 15% of patients developed a locoregional recurrence as the first site of failure, while the majority of patients (85%) had recurrence that involved a distant site. • Thus, local therapies targeted at locoregional disease, such as radiotherapy, are unlikely to significantly impact the course of this disease, further emphasising the importance of developing effective systemic adjuvant therapies.
  • 44. • One phase III multi-institutional trial of adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in Japan as reported by Takada et al.103 It should be noted that this trial included 508 patients with biliary and pancreatic cancers. However, on subset analysis, this study included 140 patients with gallbladder cancer who were randomised to undergo surgical resection alone or resection plus adjuvant mitomycin and 5FU. In considering only the patients with gallbladder cancer, the actuarial 5-year disease- free survival favoured the adjuvant chemotherapy group in comparison to the surgeryalone group (20.3% vs 11.6%). From these data, it is reasonable to offer adjuvant chemotherapy with 5FU and mitomycin; however, no consensus has been reached regarding routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • 45. • The contemporary drug gemcitabine was compared to best supportive care and 5-FU in a three-arm trial for patients with unresectable gallbladder cancer. Gemcitabine significantly improved median overall survival compared to both 5-FU and best supportive care. • Currently, gemcitabine-based regimens, often combined with a platinum agent, have become the most common choice for treating gallbladder cancer.
  • 46. • It is reasonable to consider patients with high-risk lesions (i.e., T4 tumors, node positive, R1 resection) for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy and to offer consultation with a medical oncologist to discuss treatment options. • Treatment efficacy demonstrated in the unresectable or metastatic patient may not translate into improved outcomes when used as an adjuvant to resection.
  • 47. PALLIATIVE MANAGEMENT • Most treatment options in patients with gallbladder cancer are palliative because most patients are unresectable at presentation. • The most common symptoms to palliate include pain, jaundice, and bowel obstruction. • Palliation of jaundice: endoscopic or percutaneous interventions are the preferred approach for palliation and minimizing morbidity. These palliative procedures were successful in alleviating pruritus, but there was no improvement in quality of-life.
  • 48. • The high risk of morbidity and mortality precludes recommending these treatments in the absence of symptoms or a specific reason to treat jaundice, such as allowing administration of chemotherapy. • Intestinal bypass can also be performed in patients with symptomatic bowel obstruction. Percutaneous feeding tubes or drains and endoscopic stents are favored over surgical bypass because of the extremely poor prognosis.
  • 49. • Chemotherapy has been used to palliate unresectable disease but often offers little benefit. • Clinical trials ofgemcitabine and oxaliplatin have showed response rates of 40% to 50% • Radiation therapy may be an effective palliative therapy for locally advanced disease. • Radiation therapy is generally well tolerated, may have an impact on local symptoms, and is usually combined with chemotherapy
  • 50. Key Points: • In gallbladder cancer, a cholecystectomy should be performed for adenomatous polyps >1 cm, or those that are smaller but growing and changing in character. Cholesterol polyps and • Adenomyomatosis are not premalignant conditions. • Complete surgical resection is the goal, whether the diagnosis is made preoperatively, intraoperatively or after a non-curative laparoscopic cholecystectomy. • In patients with invasion into the common bile duct, consideration should be given to neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgical exploration in an attempt to best select patients for potentially curative resection. • Obstructive jaundice in the setting of gallbladder carcinoma portends poor survival and systemic therapy should be considered prior to entertaining surgical resection.