The document summarizes a study on social presence in blended social work education. It examines how social presence, a sense of community, and communities of practice relate to students' field experiences. Preliminary data shows that students in blended field experiences had more and longer comments, showing more affect. Qualitative results found that students felt field experiences and discussing experiences with others were most beneficial for learning. Students indicated aspects like field experience and interacting with others facilitated social presence most effectively.

1. A study of social presence in blended social work education Professor Walter LaMendola, PhD University of Denver

2. Council On Social Work Education (USA) focus on e-learning & practice a special national project a subject of significance to the US social work profession

3. Components of Our Project Comparing different forms of social work practice class delivery Faculty development process Organizational requirements for social work e-learning programming Measures of student information literacy Measures of student learning outcomes

4. Presentation Today Introduce conceptual model Examine our study of social work e-learning in terms of the development of social presence community of inquiry and communities of practice related to the student's field experience. Present preliminary data

5. Elements of an Educational Experience, Figure 1 from L. Rourke, et. al. (2001) Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , JDE.

6. Intersection of Community of Inquiry and Practice Community of Inquiry: Critical thought about practice takes place Community of Practice: Human values and ethics in action situate theory Community Community of of Inquiry Practice

7. Stephen Powell (2007)

8. Practical learning From: Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. (2004) e-Learning in the 21 st Century, p 57.

9. Communities of Practice Groups of people who share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in this area by interacting on an ongoing basis From: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice, p. 4

10. From Wenger (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning as a social system

11. Practices Learning From Andrew Cox (2005) What are communities of Learning? Journal of Information Science 31,6, p 529

12. Practical learning pre-senses From: Garrison, D.R. (2006) ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES DRAFT

13. Community * Range Mean Median S.D. All participants (N = 89) Connectedness 28 26.71 28 7.029 Learning 31 29.84 31 6.765 Community 56 56.55 58 12.681 * As measured by the Rovai Classroom Community Scale (2002)

14. Community /Social Sense Classroom experience demands reflection and reflexivity, which is Based on social and intellectual needs and interactions of practitioners and students, who are An embodied practice community that situate shared values and ethics

15. Social Presence Community is emotive; affective bonding (Etzioni) A sense of “being there”, being situated, embodied Forms social identity A social context that includes cues, non-verbal expressions, movements Community is social

16. Creating Social Presence How do we vary social presence in social work education to support practitioner development? Opportunities of self disclosure Spontaneity and humor Creating awe Expressing emotions Forms of discussion Who are our community members becoming; how are their practice identities formed? Field Integration Seminar included

17. Measuring Social Presence Analysis of classroom discussions Coding for social presence (Garrison et al) Richardson & Swan (2003) measure Short, Christie, & Williams (1976) measure Student and faculty interviews

18. Social Presence Short et al (1976) Studies have shown it to be robust in measuring social presence (Biacco et al 2004) Semantic differential Warm, Sensitive, Large, Beautiful, Personal, Colorful, Open, Active, Sociable

19. Social Presence Mean Face to face 5.34 Blended 4.32 Blended Field 5.43

20. Preliminary discussion analysis Blended field more comments by students Blended field lengthier comments by students Students comments affective

21. Sample of Qualitative Results What is their perception of their learning? “ The field experience was the most beneficial to me ...having other students share their experience...The field instructor had a lot of experience that she was able to share with us. It is hard to pass up discussions... I do not think a student can get much out of reading without experience and discussion with others... Forming a sense of community, I learn better through experiential learning.” Which aspects were most effective for facilitating social presence? “ The field experience was the most beneficial, because it forced me to get out and experience issues that I hadn't before... I haven't taken the time to interact as much as I would like to but I know that people would've been available for more interaction if I'd taken the effort.

22. Possible future considerations More time in field based learning centers More student use of technology, multimedia to communicate experience and practical learning More co-teaching with field supervisors, using video conferencing Courses offered from the field site