1. OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Risk Qualitative Assesment
SL. P*I P*I P*I
Risk Area Risk Effect Risk Description Performanc Risk Rank Risk Response Mitigation Plan
NO Probability Cost Impact Time Impact Performanc
e Impact Cost Time
e
In such scenario, the review/approval process
Changes in approved design
Cost, Time, should be made faster. Decision making
1 Delay to project Foundation design changes after approval and commencement of work High High High High 16 16 16 Eliminate
Performance should be consistant & faster. Reversal to
will affect the progress of work
original scope should be avoided.
Deviation from the specifications
Cost, Time, Introduction of prokon software for foundation design not mentioned in Intoduction of all requirements in the
2 Delay to project High Very High High High 20 16 16 Improve
Performance the specification and studying of software and implementation leads to contract specification itself
more time and engineering works.
Eventhogh in accessible mountains the angle
points shall be properly selected with minium
Selection Route Alignment with out proper Walk over survey - selection of required details of terrain in between and
route from Google Data- Section of Angle points upto 3.0-4.0 m in straight selection of route in such a way to get suitable
line in hilly area without analysing the the site geographical conditions tower postiobns which will reduce benching ,
length of access roads and thereby
construction time
Due to the incompetency of conatrctors
Selection of comptentent project team who is having previous working project team , realistic planning ,
Corrective action identification of project hazards are not
experience in OHL construction in hilly area.
happening which are resulting in dealy of
project
Propoer machinary deployment , allocation of
Deployment of sufficient powerful machinaries in work liks access road ,
Corrective action sufficient work front will enhance the
benching and excvation which are the tough civil work in this hilly area.
progress of work
Most of the activities in foundations are
Absence of materials , Tools and plant like form box shutters and chimney
Corrective action happening in more days due to shortages of
for founadtion work
materails
Implemenation of user friendly or tailor made
Implemenation of user friendly or tailor made design for the easiness of design for the easiness of foundation work
foundation work (like hauch and trapezoidal base ) results in incaresed (like hauch and trapezoidal base ) results in
preaparatory work which is deaplying completion time incaresed preaparatory work which is
deaplying completion time
New comments in subsequent revision of single document All the comments to be given in first
Cost, Time,
3 Delay to project Passing out new comments in each revision of foundation design may lead High Low Very High High 8 20 16 Eliminate submission and new comments in subsequent
Performance
to design cycle delay and delay in execution submissions to be avoided
Poor Vendor Support
Time wasted waiting for response to queries or due to rework arising from Efficient tracking of design
Cost, Time,
4 Delay to project assumptions made by the project team in the interim or the vendor Very low High High High 4 4 4 Improve submission/approvals.Interim changes in
Performance
reluctant to accepting the change request due to deviation in client design requirements to be avoided.
requirements.
Delay to project & Dependence of External suppliers May
Cost, Time, miss milestones waiting for deliverables due to delay in vendor approvals, Adequate control Timely approval of vendors and design.
5 adverse impact in Medium High High High 12 12 12
Performance design approvals and issue of manufacturing clearance measures to be in place Manufacturing clearance to be given in time.
project cashflow
Non availability of approved materials The
Cost, Time, Adequate control Take prior approval of multiple parties based
6 Delay to project approved materials will not be readily available or approved vendor may Very low High High High 4 4 4
Performance measures to be in place on their availabilty.
fail to deliver due to some reasons
Change in the original route
Bestowing of approved route during site
Cost, Time, Delay to project and The changes in original tender route and line passing through high hilly
7 Very High Very High Very High High 25 25 20 Eliminate handing over or properly estimating the
Performance huge cost impact terrain due to objection from Municipality or objection of locals or due to
possible route during tender stage itself.
line passing through eco-torism zone
Scope Variations Scope variations in the interim should be
Delay to project & Conscious decision to
Cost, Time, More than 20% increase in the BOQ quantity for activities like benching, maximum avoided.In case of scope variations
7 adverse impact in Very High Very High Very High High 25 25 20 accept impact
Performance tower supply due to change in original route may adversely affect the it should be recorded and tracked for
project cashflow contractually
project execution proporationate time and cost implications
Difficulty in manual survey Adoption of LIDAR survey in such terrain
Cost, Time,
9 Delay to project Difficulty in the conventional manual survey due to hilly terrain conditions High High High High 16 16 16 Improve where manual survey is possible to save time
Performance
or non-accessability to locations and cost
Damage in access road due to rain The
Cost, Time, access road to reach the locations may get damaged due to heavy rain Application for insurance for such roads
10 Delay to project Medium High High High 12 12 12 Corrective action
Performance affecting the subsequent activities like benching,foundation etc inturn which can be claimed under natural calamity
affecting the overall project schedule
On transit material risk The Application for insurance in advance and
Cost, Time,
11 Delay to project possibilty of material may get lost or damaged on transit of materials from Medium High High High 12 12 12 Corrective action procuring materials through air fright to avoid
Performance
source port to destination port time delay
Delay to project & Strictly follow the HSE rules,statistics to be
Cost, Time, HSE Non compliance Adequate control
12 adverse impact in Low Low Very Low Low 4 2 4 maintained regularly. Approved HSE plan
Performance Non compliance may cause loss of manhours and damage to environment measures to be in place
reputation should be strictly implemented
Cost, Time, Availability of Resources Resource planning to be done at different
13 Delay to project Low Low Medium Low 4 6 4 Improve
Performance Resources constraints will affect the project milestones stages of the project
Project control procedures to be
Cost, Time, Project Controlling implemented and MIS reports to be be
14 Delay to project Low Low Low Low 4 4 4 Improve
Performance Project control procedures may not be adequate. generated for monitoring the project
parameters.
Proper tracking system has to be adopted and
Cost, Time, Site Inspection tracking The inspection request
15 Delay in starting activity Low Low Low Low 4 4 4 Improve responsible QA/QC engineer ahs to be given
Performance given for consultant/client for activities may get missed or delayed
responsibility
Allocating only 2m working space for benching activities in hilly terrain
Cost, Time,
16 Delay to project The space constarint in tower locations may affect painitng activity in Very High High High High 20 20 20 Improve The painting has to be done after erection
Performance
gorund itself
Page 1 of 1