Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

March 9, 2011 City Council Workshop

5,598 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

March 9, 2011 City Council Workshop

  1. 1. Oak Harbor Facilities Plan<br />City Council Workshop<br />March 9, 2011<br />
  2. 2. Agenda<br />Project Schedule Update<br />Brief Review of Preliminary Alternatives<br />Overview of Evaluation Process<br />Proposed Alternatives and Sites<br />Summary/Next Steps<br />
  3. 3. Project Schedule Update<br />
  4. 4. Overall Project Schedule<br />
  5. 5. Planning and Preliminary Engineering Milestones<br />Short List 4 Alts<br />Identify Proposed Alt<br />Approval to Submit Plan<br />
  6. 6. Review of Preliminary Alternatives<br />
  7. 7. 2 WWTP Process Options<br />
  8. 8. 8 Candidate Sites(Public/US Navy Input + Technical Requirements)<br />
  9. 9. 3 Candidate Outfall Locations<br />Crescent HarborMitigate Shellfish Impact With Deep Diffuser<br />Oak HarborLimited Shellfish Impact<br />West BeachMitigate Shellfish Impact With Deep Diffuser<br />
  10. 10. Matrix of Preliminary Alternatives13 Alternatives, 8 Potential Sites<br />Oak HarborLimited Shellfish Impact<br />
  11. 11. TBL+ Comparison of Alternatives<br />
  12. 12. Technical and community objectives drive alternative selection<br />Technical considerations:<br />Reliable, safe, efficient treatment facility to meet current and future regulations<br />Community feedback:<br />Continue existing level of service<br />Control costs<br />Avoid open space/public impact<br />Implement a long-term solution<br />
  13. 13. TBL+ objectives developed to match input<br />Financial<br />Social<br />Environmental<br />Technical<br /><ul><li>T1
  14. 14. T2
  15. 15. T3
  16. 16. S1
  17. 17. S2
  18. 18. S3
  19. 19. E1
  20. 20. E2
  21. 21. E3
  22. 22. F1
  23. 23. F2
  24. 24. F3</li></li></ul><li> * Criteria matching Oak Harbor Comprehensive Plan<br />Environmental Objectives<br />
  25. 25. * Criteria matching Oak Harbor Comprehensive Plan<br />Social Objectives<br />
  26. 26. * Criteria matching Oak Harbor Comprehensive Plan<br />Technical Objectives<br />
  27. 27. * Criteria matching Oak Harbor Comprehensive Plan<br />Financial Objectives<br />
  28. 28. Financial analysis focused on comparing relative cost of alternatives<br />“Conceptual level”* costs developed for 3 major components:<br />Outfall3% - 5% of total<br />Conveyance3% - 20% of total<br />Treatment Plant80% - 90% of total<br /> * Expected accuracy is -50% to +30%<br />
  29. 29. “Unit cost” of treatment compared with multiple local MBR* projects as check<br />Blaine, WA<br />Oak HarborDesign Capacity<br /> * AS facilities typically cost 8% to10% less than MBR<br />
  30. 30. Other cost factors considered in comparative analysis<br />Project Contingency: 30%<br />Accounts for planning level uncertainty<br />Washington State Sales Tax: 8.7%<br />Allied Costs (Engineering, Legal, Admin): 25%<br />“Soft” project costs not related to construction<br />Escalation to Mid-point of Construction: 3% per yr<br />Assumes bidding in 2014<br />
  31. 31. 6 Alternatives are within 10% of lowestcost Alternative (3B)<br />Alternative 3BLowest Cost<br />
  32. 32. Proposed Alternatives & Sites<br />
  33. 33. Windjammer Park SiteAlternative 1: MBR with discharge to Oak Harbor outfall<br />Advantages<br />Low relative cost (~ 6% above lowest cost)<br />Most efficient use of infrastructure<br />Challenges<br />Facilities located in/near Windjammer Park<br />
  34. 34. Marina SiteAlternative 2A/B: MBR/AS with discharge to Oak Harbor outfall<br />Advantages<br />Low relative cost (3% to 9% above lowest cost)<br />Avoids facilities in/near Windjammer Park<br />Challenges<br />Inefficient use of infrastructure<br />Marina impact (MBR) or US Navy property (AS)<br />
  35. 35. Old City Shops SiteAlternative 3A/B: MBR/AS with discharge to Oak Harbor outfall<br />Advantages<br />Low relative cost (0% to 6% above lowest cost)<br />Avoids facilities in/near Windjammer Park<br />Relatively efficient use of infrastructure<br />Challenges<br />Places facilities in neighborhood area<br />
  36. 36. Beachview Farm SiteAlternative 4B: AS with discharge to Oak Harbor outfall<br />Advantages<br />Low relative cost (~ 3% above lowest cost)<br />Avoids facilities in parks/neighborhood areas<br />Opportunity for beneficial reuse of effluent<br />Challenges<br />Inefficient use of infrastructure<br />
  37. 37. Sites Proposed For Further Evaluation<br />
  38. 38. Summary and Next Steps<br />
  39. 39. Public Process Schematic<br />
  40. 40. Full TBL+ Summary ofPreliminary Alternatives<br />
  41. 41. AWindjammer<br />B/E<br />Marina<br />FOld City Shops<br />KPioneer<br />IBeachview<br />LNew Shops<br />JNavy East<br />MChevy Lot<br />SITE<br />
  42. 42. AWindjammer<br />B/E<br />Marina<br />FOld City Shops<br />KPioneer<br />IBeachview<br />LNew Shops<br />JNavy East<br />MChevy Lot<br />SITE<br />

×