India has seen a significant increase in wind power capacity, reaching 32.72 GW by October 2017, making it the fourth largest in the world, with Tamil Nadu leading in production. Key projects include the 1500 MW Muppandal Wind Farm and Jaisalmer Wind Park. The document also discusses advancements in wind turbine technology and outlines various types of turbines, emphasizing efficiency measures like power coefficient.

1. WIND POWER PLANT
Prof. Siraskar G.D.
Mechanical engineering department
PCCOE&R

2. By David
MacKay's

4. Wind power generation capacity in India has significantly
increased in recent years. As of the end of October 2017 the
total installed wind power capacity was 32.72 GW,
India had the fourth largest installed wind power capacity in the world.
Installed wind power capacity and generation in India since 2007
Financi
al year
09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17
Installe
d
capacit
y (MW)
13,064 16,084 18,421 20,150 22,465 23,447 26,777 32,280
Genera
tion
(GWh)
28,214 28,604 46,011

5. •Tamil Nadu has become a leader in Wind Power in India. In
Muppandal windfarm the total capacity is 1500 MW
•Maharashtra is one of the prominent states that installed
wind power projects second to Tamil Nadu in India. As of end
of March 2016, installed wind power capacity is 4655.25 MW

6. Ran
k
Power plant Producer Location State MWe
1
Muppandal
windfarm[26]
Muppandal
Wind
Kanyakumari Tamil Nadu 1500
2
Jaisalmer Wind
Park[27]
Suzlon
Energy
Jaisalmer Rajasthan 1064
3
Brahmanvel
windfarm[28]
Parakh Agro
Industries
Dhule Maharashtra 528
4
Dhalgaon
windfarm[29]
Gadre
Marine
Exports
Sangli Maharashtra 278
5
Vankusawade Wind
Park
Suzlon
Energy Ltd.
Satara
District.
Maharashtra 259

8. 3, siemens-Gamesa Renewable Energy SWT-8.0-154
First seen in 2011 as a 6MW unit with a rotor diameter of 120 metres,
Siemens twice since upgraded the direct-drive offshore turbine for a
power rating of 8MW with an extended rotor diameter of 154 metres
Power rating 8MW Rotor diameter 154m
Drivetrain Direct-drive IEC Class lB
.
1. MHI Vestas V164 9.5MW: The fortunes of the MHI Vestas joint venture,
created in April 2014, depend largely on the success of this model, the
biggest wind turbine in serial production today
Power rating 9.5MW Rotor diameter 164m
Drivetrain Medium-speed geared IEC Class S
2. Adwen AD-180
Another product of an offshore joint venture - this time between Gamesa
and Areva - the Adwen AD-180 is setting a new benchmark for blade length
at 88.4 metres, 10% longer than even those of the MHI Vestas V164.
Power rating 8MW Rotor diameter 180m
Drivetrain Medium-speed geared IEC Class lB

11. Wind Power plant:

21. Classification of wind turbine

22. •Two blades : 2 MW to 3MW , large wind turbines, with
better material like glass fiber reinforced plastic
•Three blades : 15 kw to 3 MW, speed 300 to 400 rpm
•Multi blades : 20 to 30 blades, 60 to 80 rpm

23. Vertical axis
•Savonius rotor:/ s –rotor: ,
hollow elliptical cylinder sliced in
two pieces and each of these
halves fixed to a vertical axis with
fixed gap
•Darrieus types rotor : two or
three convex shaped blades with
aerofoil cross-section along with
their length the blades are curved
into shapes called troposkein.

24. •Advantages over horizontal: no
orientation in the direction of wind
•can work at low speed up to 8 kmh
where as horizontal need 16 kmh
•No big structure required

25. Vertical axis wind turbine:
•Does not need yaw control mechanism since vanes of wind
mill can accept the wind from any direction
•Does not require big support tower , as gear box generator
mounted on ground
•Cost is less
•Cost of maintenance is low
•Height of tower 100 m
•Hollow shaft supported by two bearings
•Upper platforms supported by six guy ropes

26. Horizontal axis wind turbine:

28. •2 to 3 blades FRP
•Diameter of rotor 2 to 25 m modern up to 100 m even up to
180 m
•Automatic electromagnetic brakes if wind speed beyond
design capacity
•The hub, brakes, gear box, generators is housed in box
called nacelle
•Small wind turbine , tail vane adjust direction of wind blades
in the wind direction
•In big turbine , wind sensors sense the direction and yaw
mechanism adjust the wind blades in wind direction

30. 25 to 40 m, dia, at
speed of 300 to 400
rpm produced 120 kw
power

39. Power Coefficient - It's an Efficiency
I would like to call it (and some people do) overall turbine system efficiency. The
wind power industry often calls it the Power Coefficient, and gives it the
symbol Cp.
The technical and product literature is now full of it (the term Cp I mean), so
Power Coefficient it shall be for the rest of this page.
Power Coefficient - An Indicator of Total Wind Turbine System Efficiency
The term Power Coefficient is commonly used to designate the efficiency of the
entire turbine power system. As shown in the expression below, it is generally
defined as the ratio of the "electrical power produced by the wind turbine" (Pout in
the formula below) divided by the "wind power into the turbine" (Pin). Pin is
sometimes also called "available wind power". But I don't really like that
expression because the total power in the wind is never really totally "available".

40. The tip-speed ratio, X, or TSR for wind turbines is the ratio
between the tangential speed of the tip of a blade and the
actual speed of the

52. Cost of wind mill = 4 crores / MW

53. Attempts to develop and refine OTEC technology started in the 1880s. In
1881, Jacques Arsene d'Arsonval, a French physicist, proposed tapping the
thermal energy of the ocean

54. In 1935, Claude constructed a plant aboard a 10,000-ton cargo vessel moored
off the coast of Brazil. Weather and waves destroyed it before it could
generate net power.[5] (Net power is the amount of power generated after
subtracting power needed to run the system).
In 1956, French scientists designed a 3 MW plant for Abidjan, Ivory Coast. The
plant was never completed, because new finds of large amounts of cheap
petroleum made it uneconomical.[5]
In 1962, J. Hilbert Anderson and James H. Anderson, Jr. focused on increasing
component efficiency. They patented their new "closed cycle" design in
1967.[7] This design improved upon the original closed-cycle Rankine system,
and included this in an outline for a plant that would produce power at lower cost
than oil or coal. At the time, however, their research garnered little attention since
coal and nuclear were considered the future of energy.[6]
Japan is a major contributor to the development of OTEC
technology.[8] Beginning in 1970 the Tokyo Electric Power Company successfully
built and deployed a 100 kW closed-cycle OTEC plant on the island
of Nauru.[8] The plant became operational on 14 October 1981, producing about
120 kW of electricity;

55. Currently operating OTEC plants[edit]
In March 2013, Saga University with various Japanese industries
completed the installation of a new OTEC plant. Okinawa Prefecture announced
the start of the OTEC operation testing at Kume Island on April 15, 2013. The
main aim is to prove the validity of computer models and demonstrate OTEC to
the public. The testing and research will be conducted with the support of Saga
University until the end of FY 2016. IHI Plant Construction Co. Ltd, Yokogawa
Electric Corporation, and Xenesys Inc were entrusted with constructing the 100
kilowatt class plant within the grounds of the Okinawa Prefecture Deep Sea
Water Research Center. The location was specifically chosen in order to utilize
existing deep seawater and surface seawater intake pipes installed for the
research center in 2000. The pipe is used for the intake of deep sea water for
research, fishery, and agricultural use.[19] The plant consists of two 50 kW units
in double Rankine configuration.[30] The OTEC facility and deep seawater
research center are open to free public tours by appointment in English and
Japanese.[31] Currently, this is one of only two fully operational OTEC plants in
the world. This plant operates continuously when specific tests are not
underway.

56. In 2011, Makai Ocean Engineering completed a heat exchanger test facility at
NELHA. Used to test a variety of heat exchange technologies for use in OTEC,
Makai has received funding to install a 105 kW turbine.[32] Installation will make
this facility the largest operational OTEC facility, though the record for largest
power will remain with the Open Cycle plant also developed in Hawaii.
In July 2014, DCNS group partnered with Akuo Energy announced NER 300
funding for their NEMO project. If successful, the 16MW gross 10MW net offshore
plant will be the largest OTEC facility to date. DCNS plans to have NEMO
operational by 2020.[33]
An ocean thermal energy conversion power plant built by Makai Ocean
Engineering went operational in Hawaii in August 2015 . The governor of
Hawaii, David Ige, "flipped the switch" to activate the plant. This is the first true
closed-cycle ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) plant to be connected to
a U.S. electrical grid . It is a demo plant capable of generating 105 kilowatts,
enough to power about 120 homes.[34]

57. The world's biggest operational OTEC plant has an annual
power generation capacity of 100kW, which is sufficient to
power 120 homes in Hawaii. Image: courtesy of Makai Ocean
Engineering. The OTEC plant is located within the Natural
Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (NELHA) in Kailua-
Kona.

67. Tidal energy

72. Station
Capacity
(MW)
Country Location Comm
Annapolis
Royal
Generating
Station
20 Canada
44°45′07″N65
°30′40″W
1984
Jiangxia Tidal
Power
Station
3.2 China
28°20′34″N12
1°14′25″E
1980
Kislaya Guba
Tidal Power
Station
1.7 Russia
69°22′37″N 3
3°04′33″E
1968
Rance Tidal
Power
Station
240 France
48°37′05″N02
°01′24″W
1966
Sihwa Lake
Tidal Power
Station
254 South Korea
37°18′47″N12
6°36′46″E
2011

73. Sihwa Lake
Tidal Power
Station
254 South Korea
37°18′47″N12
6°36′46″E
2011
Strangford
Lough SeaGe
n (Decommiss
ioned in 2016)
1.2
United
Kingdom
54°22′04″N05°
32′40″W
2008
Uldolmok
Tidal Power
Station
1.5 South Korea
34°32′07″N12
6°14′06″E
2009
Eastern
Scheldt Barrie
r Tidal Power
Plant
1.25
The
Netherlands
51°36′19″N 03
°40′59″E
2015

74. Proposed[edit]
There are many stations in proposal at the moment. The following table lists
tidal power stations that are only at a proposal stage
Station Capacity (MW) Country Location Const
Garorim Bay Tidal
Power Station
520 South Korea Garorim Bay
Incheon Tidal Power
Station
818 or 1,320 South Korea
37°29′48″N 126°20′32″
E
2017
Severn Barrage 8,640 United Kingdom
51°21′30″N 03°06′00″
W
Tugurskaya Tidal
Power Plant
3,640 Russia Okhotsk Sea
Mezenskaya Tidal
Power Plant
24,000 Russia Mezen Bay
Penzhinskaya Tidal
Power Plant
87,100 Russia Penzhin Bay
Skerries Tidal Stream
Array
10.5 United Kingdom
53°26′N 04°36′W appr
ox.
Tidal Lagoon Swansea
Bay
320 United Kingdom Swansea Bay 2015–2017
Dalupiri Blue Energy
Project
2,200 Philippines 12°25′N 124°17′E
Gulf of Kutch Project 50 India Gulf of Kutch 2012
Alderney tidal plant 300 Alderney 49°42′52″N 2°12′19″W 2020
The Gujarat government is all set to develop India’s first tidal energy plant. The
state government has approved Rs 25 crore for setting up the 50 MW plant at
the Gulf of Kutch. It will produce energy from the ocean tides.Y 2012

112. open cycle MHD system

119. FUEL CELLS
Fuel cell

120. THE PROMISE OF FUEL CELLS
 “A score of nonutility companies are well advanced
toward developing a powerful chemical fuel cell,
which could sit in some hidden closet of every
home silently ticking off electric power.”
 Theodore Levitt, “Marketing Myopia,” Harvard
Business Review, 1960
Theodore Levitt, “Marketing Myopia,” Harvard Business Review, 1960

121. PEM FUEL CELL

122. PARTS OF A FUEL CELL Anode
 Negative post of the fuel cell.
 Conducts the electrons that are freed from the hydrogen molecules so that
they can be used in an external circuit.
 Etched channels disperse hydrogen gas over the surface of catalyst.
 Cathode
 Positive post of the fuel cell
 Etched channels distribute oxygen to the surface of the catalyst.
 Conducts electrons back from the external circuit to the catalyst
 Recombine with the hydrogen ions and oxygen to form water.
 Electrolyte
 Proton exchange membrane.
 Specially treated material, only conducts positively charged ions.
 Membrane blocks electrons.
 Catalyst
 Special material that facilitates reaction of oxygen and hydrogen
 Usually platinum powder very thinly coated onto carbon paper or cloth.
 Rough & porous maximizes surface area exposed to hydrogen or oxygen
 The platinum-coated side of the catalyst faces the PEM.

123. FUEL CELL OPERATION
 Pressurized hydrogen gas (H2) enters cell on anode
side.
 Gas is forced through catalyst by pressure.
 When H2 molecule comes contacts platinum catalyst, it splits
into two H+ ions and two electrons (e-).
 Electrons are conducted through the anode
 Make their way through the external circuit (doing useful work
such as turning a motor) and return to the cathode side of the
fuel cell.
 On the cathode side, oxygen gas (O2) is forced through
the catalyst
 Forms two oxygen atoms, each with a strong negative
charge.
 Negative charge attracts the two H+ ions through the
membrane,
 Combine with an oxygen atom and two electrons from the
external circuit to form a water molecule (H2O).

124. PROTON-EXCHANGE MEMBRANE CELL
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Nov03/Fuelcell.institute.deb.html

125. PEM FUEL CELL ANIMATION
Click on Diagram

126. FUEL CELL STACK
http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/photos.html

127. HYDROGEN FUEL CELL EFFICIENCY
 40% efficiency converting methanol to hydrogen in
reformer
 80% of hydrogen energy content converted to electrical
energy
 80% efficiency for inverter/motor
 Converts electrical to mechanical energy
 Overall efficiency of 24-32%

128. AUTO POWER EFFICIENCY COMPARISON
Technology
System
Efficiency
Fuel Cell 24-32%
Electric Battery 26%
Gasoline Engine 20%
http://www.howstuffworks.com/fuel-cell.htm/printable

129. OTHER TYPES OF FUEL CELLS
 Alkaline fuel cell (AFC)
 This is one of the oldest designs. It has been used in the U.S. space program
since the 1960s. The AFC is very susceptible to contamination, so it requires
pure hydrogen and oxygen. It is also very expensive, so this type of fuel cell is
unlikely to be commercialized.
 Phosphoric-acid fuel cell (PAFC)
 The phosphoric-acid fuel cell has potential for use in small stationary power-
generation systems. It operates at a higher temperature than PEM fuel cells, so
it has a longer warm-up time. This makes it unsuitable for use in cars.
 Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC)
 These fuel cells are best suited for large-scale stationary power generators that
could provide electricity for factories or towns. This type of fuel cell operates at
very high temperatures (around 1,832 F, 1,000 C). This high temperature
makes reliability a problem, but it also has an advantage: The steam produced
by the fuel cell can be channeled into turbines to generate more electricity. This
improves the overall efficiency of the system.
 Molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC)
 These fuel cells are also best suited for large stationary power generators. They
operate at 1,112 F (600 C), so they also generate steam that can be used to
generate more power. They have a lower operating temperature than the
SOFC, which means they don't need such exotic materials. This makes the
design a little less expensive.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/fuel-cell.htm/printable

134. ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES OF FUEL
CELLS
 Advantages
 Water is the only discharge (pure H2)
 Disadvantages
 CO2 discharged with methanol reform
 Little more efficient than alternatives
 Technology currently expensive
 Many design issues still in progress
 Hydrogen often created using “dirty” energy (e.g., coal)
 Pure hydrogen is difficult to handle
 Refilling stations, storage tanks, …

135. FUEL CELLS

136. EXTRA SLIDES

137. FUEL CELL ENERGY EXCHANGE
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/electrol.html

138. PEM FUEL CELL SCHEMATIC