13.1 Nixon’s AmericaThe conservative consensus that supported .docxmoggdede
13.1 Nixon’s America
The conservative consensus that supported Falwell’s Moral Majority was not yet in place when Richard Nixon assumed the presidency in 1969. He campaigned against Johnson’s Great Society and the millions of dollars funneled into government programs. Although many Americans were disillusioned with the Vietnam War and concerned with urban unrest and the growing rights demands of various groups in society, Nixon won by a very small margin.
Once in office, Nixon departed from his campaign rhetoric and advanced the liberal causes of his predecessor in important ways. Many of Nixon’s programs and actions angered conservatives in his own Republican Party. However, the Vietnam War was the most pressing concern he faced upon assuming office.
Nixon and Vietnam
Nixon pursued a peace settlement already begun during Johnson’s administration. American and North Vietnamese leaders met in Paris to discuss the possibility of ending the hostilities. Though the diplomatic talks had no direct impact on the war, they helped boost Nixon’s popularity at home.
Nixon further increased his public approval with his policy of Vietnamization. This meant that the United States sought to limit its fighting on the ground by training South Vietnamese forces to wage their own war. The president had inherited a difficult situation, and he determined early in 1969 that there was little possibility of victory. He devised the Vietnamization strategy to ease the U.S. involvement before the almost inevitable collapse of South Vietnam. Nixon announced this policy directly to the American people in a televised address on November 3, 1969, saying:
Good evening, my fellow Americans. Tonight I want to talk to you on a subject of deep concern to all Americans and to many people in all parts of the world—the war in Vietnam. I believe that one of the reasons for the deep division about Vietnam is that many Americans have lost confidence in what their Government has told them about our policy. (as cited in Vilade, 2012, p. 196)
At that point 31,000 Americans had died in the war, and Nixon told the American people that there were just two courses of action. The first was immediate withdrawal. The second was to persist in “our search for peace” and “continued implementation of our plan for Vietnamization.” Nixon concluded by saying, “I have chosen this second course. It is not the easy way. It is the right way” (as cited in Gettleman, 1995, p. 444).
Cambodia and Its Consequences
Vietnamization did little to ease the conflict or the antiwar protests in the United States. In 1970 Nixon ordered troops into Cambodia, a neutral nation on the border of Vietnam. Aiming to cut off supplies to the North, the movement instead destabilized the Cambodian government and began a chain of events that saw the rise of the Communist Khmer Rouge party. During its reign, which lasted until 1979, Cambodians were indiscriminately killed and forced into rural communes.
The Cambodian cam ...
13.1 Nixon’s AmericaThe conservative consensus that supported .docxmoggdede
13.1 Nixon’s America
The conservative consensus that supported Falwell’s Moral Majority was not yet in place when Richard Nixon assumed the presidency in 1969. He campaigned against Johnson’s Great Society and the millions of dollars funneled into government programs. Although many Americans were disillusioned with the Vietnam War and concerned with urban unrest and the growing rights demands of various groups in society, Nixon won by a very small margin.
Once in office, Nixon departed from his campaign rhetoric and advanced the liberal causes of his predecessor in important ways. Many of Nixon’s programs and actions angered conservatives in his own Republican Party. However, the Vietnam War was the most pressing concern he faced upon assuming office.
Nixon and Vietnam
Nixon pursued a peace settlement already begun during Johnson’s administration. American and North Vietnamese leaders met in Paris to discuss the possibility of ending the hostilities. Though the diplomatic talks had no direct impact on the war, they helped boost Nixon’s popularity at home.
Nixon further increased his public approval with his policy of Vietnamization. This meant that the United States sought to limit its fighting on the ground by training South Vietnamese forces to wage their own war. The president had inherited a difficult situation, and he determined early in 1969 that there was little possibility of victory. He devised the Vietnamization strategy to ease the U.S. involvement before the almost inevitable collapse of South Vietnam. Nixon announced this policy directly to the American people in a televised address on November 3, 1969, saying:
Good evening, my fellow Americans. Tonight I want to talk to you on a subject of deep concern to all Americans and to many people in all parts of the world—the war in Vietnam. I believe that one of the reasons for the deep division about Vietnam is that many Americans have lost confidence in what their Government has told them about our policy. (as cited in Vilade, 2012, p. 196)
At that point 31,000 Americans had died in the war, and Nixon told the American people that there were just two courses of action. The first was immediate withdrawal. The second was to persist in “our search for peace” and “continued implementation of our plan for Vietnamization.” Nixon concluded by saying, “I have chosen this second course. It is not the easy way. It is the right way” (as cited in Gettleman, 1995, p. 444).
Cambodia and Its Consequences
Vietnamization did little to ease the conflict or the antiwar protests in the United States. In 1970 Nixon ordered troops into Cambodia, a neutral nation on the border of Vietnam. Aiming to cut off supplies to the North, the movement instead destabilized the Cambodian government and began a chain of events that saw the rise of the Communist Khmer Rouge party. During its reign, which lasted until 1979, Cambodians were indiscriminately killed and forced into rural communes.
The Cambodian cam ...
Course Title POL 300014VA016-001 Contempt Intl ProblemsDa.docxfaithxdunce63732
Course Title: POL 300014VA016-001 Contempt Intl Problems
Date: 05/12/2015
When Nixon took over the office in 1969 the US was at war for about 4 years with Vietnam. Eisenhower's vice president and Richard M. Nixon, would challenge the premises. One of Nixon's goals, in fact, was to limit the force in Vietnam. He would introduce his new approach on 25 July 1969. Nixon started working on making peace between both the countries which became somewhat successful in 1969 during his multi nation tour. The very day that America began its lengthy retreat from the jungles and marshes of Vietnam. While talking to the press Nixon reported that US troop withdrawals. And announces the new US policy with the Vietnam. Nixon's policy towards Vietnam encourages their friends and allies greater resources in their own defense.
From the past experience Nixon established some principles which he derived from the war experience with Vietnam had undergone a recent and dramatic transformation. As Nixon explained, the United States was the only major country to escape the social and economic destruction of World War II. The United States helped the countries in the first of couple of year to rebuild their economy and countries because they were not able to do it by themselves because The United States could be the best choice who could help them rebuilding the country. After the first post war the era was established with a brand new configuration. Countries who used to received supplies from US were now able to help them self by contributing to their own defense. Soviet started was with East Germany, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, as well as they had issues with China. These incidents according to Nixon those incidents, according to Nixon, created different challenges and new opportunities.
In 1966 France withdrew his military personal from the NATO forces. Europe and the United States had to tax their alliance countries for America’s ability for the survival of their liberty. And due to war in Vietnam it continues to drain US resources.
When Nixon saw the realities related to the past so he decide to reshape US foreign policy. Those realities led Nixon to reshape the rhetoric and practice of U.S. foreign policy. He knew that United States presence is very important for their allies. He cleared the role and responsibilities of United States towards other countries and to itself. He also mentioned that United States needs to limit the use of its power and also needs to discuss the situation with other partners then going to war by itself without discussing it with its allies. And also check their options because war is not always the decision and US cannot make enemies by going tall the time in war. Peace talks can always change the scenarios.
Nixon's made a special announcement during his Guam doctrine which cleared his positing about the strategies he will be using for his military. On Nov 3, 1969 President Nixon had to clarify his speech because the newly co.
HIS 204 Week 4 DQ 2 Cold War
HIS 204 Week 4 DQ 1 A Single American Nation
HIS 304 Week 3 Quiz
HIS 204 Week 3 Final Paper Preparation (Native American history)
HIS 204 Week 3 DQ 2 The End of Isolation
HIS 204 Week 3 DQ 1 Normalcy and the New Deal
HIS 204 Week 2 Quiz
HIS 204 Week 2 Paper The Progressive Presidents
HIS 204 Week 2 DQ 2 America's Age of Imperialism
HIS 204 Week 2 DQ 1 The Progressive Movement
HIS 204 Week 1 Quiz
HIS 204 Week 1 DQ 2 The Industrial Revolution
HIS 204 Week 1 DQ 1 The History of Reconstruction
HIS 204 Week 4 Quiz
HIS 204 Week 5 DQ 1 The Age of Reagan
HIS 204 Week 5 DQ 2 The Lived Experience of Ordinary People
HIS 204 Week 5 Final Paper Native American history
Thinking Big Advising Nixon on VietnamIn this Final Paper, you .docxcroftsshanon
Thinking Big: Advising Nixon on Vietnam
In this Final Paper, you must take the role of an advisor to President Nixon on April 25, 1972. On that day, President Nixon and Henry Kissinger discussed policy options that would end America’s military involvement in Vietnam. At that time, the United States was supporting the government of South Vietnam in its struggle against the communist government of North Vietnam. North Vietnam was supported by the Soviet Union with weapons and diplomatic support at world bodies such as the United Nations. The proxy war between the pro-American South Vietnamese government and the pro-Soviet North Vietnamese government was a bloody chapter in the Cold War between nuclear two super powers. The fighting in Vietnam between the North and the South Vietnamese governments had been going on since the mid-1950s, but it was not until 1965 that the U.S. intervened in a significant way through the deployment of regular army units. By the early 1970s, however, antiwar sentiment in the United States had reached its high-water mark, characterized by massive demonstrations that took place throughout the country. Consequently, President Nixon came under relentless pressure to get U.S. troops out of Vietnam. However, powerful pro-war elements in Congress forced Nixon to demand certain concessions from North Vietnam in exchange for peace; this would help the U.S. save face in the eyes of world opinion. After all, they argued, the United States, a nuclear superpower, could not be seen turning tail and running away from its commitments.
Nixon and Kissinger discussed several policy options that have since been made available to the general public through the National Archives, and these audio recordings, known as the Nixon Tapes, give us an instructive account of power and how it works at the highest levels of government. All the options the two men discussed involved escalations of violence that took two essential forms: strategic bombing and naval blockade. Strategic bombing means the targeting of a country’s economic infrastructure; for example, its electrical grids, power plants, oil refineries, pharmaceutical plants, and bridges. In the case of Vietnam, the targeting list included a series of dikes whose destruction would have resulted in devastating flooding that U.S. officials estimated at the time would number some 200,000 civilian deaths. The naval element of the escalation proposed using the U.S. Navy to mine and to block North Vietnam’s deep-water ports thus preventing Soviet ships from resupplying the North Vietnamese government with weapons and other forms of assistance. Perhaps the most compelling revelation of this conversation is that Nixon rather casually proposed playing the nuclear card, meaning the use of tactical as opposed to strategic nuclear weapons that are much more deadly in terms of destructive capacity.
Keep in mind that this event happened during the height of the Cold War. There had already been sever ...
Info graphic great depression poster assignmentWayne Williams
Poster Assignment- "The Great Depression: Laissez Fair or Mixed Economy? What were the causes and effects of the Great Depression. Was John Maynard Keynes correct...can federal government intervention programs help or hurt an economy that is mired in a Great Depression?
Great article that examines the lessons that students of military history can study to learn how lessons learned from America's Indian Wars still applies to military studies today.
A study of the people and events in early American history, leading up to the American Revolution. Students will gain insight into the character of George Washington and his military background.
Students will work individually or in groups. Fact-check the answers by looking up and citing reliable sources that reveal historical information that is often hidden on the topic of Communist subversion of the United States and the U.N.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases and how they affected American society.Wayne Williams
Students will examine important SCOTUS cases and analyze how they affected American society. Answer the questions on the handout that match the slide numbers.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Nixon; Ending Vietnam, Detente and New Federalism
1. US History “Nixon Ends Vietnam, Détente and the New Federalism” May 15
Objectives: Students will…
Discuss the Kent State massacre and other consequences of the Vietnam War.
Analyze the causes and effects of détente, related to the Soviet Union and China.
Instructions: Find today’s PowerPoint lesson with questions here:
• Answer the 5 questions at the end of this outline
• Turn in all work from this week (March 13-today) No make-up work accepted
after this Friday.
• Study the outline below, as there will be questions on the final from this as well.
• Final Exam: Monday, May 20 at 10 AM.
I. Nixon and Vietnam (continued)
A. Kent State, 1970 Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE0sDfukvso
1. Stunned by the invasion, college students across the nation
erupted in protest.
2. More than 1.5 million angry students shut down 1,200 campuses.
3. Disaster struck hardest at Kent State University in Ohio. A
massive student protest led to the burning of the ROTC building.
In response to the growing unrest, the local mayor called in the
National Guard.
4. Nervous members of the National Guard fired into a crowd of
protesters, killing four students and wounding nine.
5. The Kent State shootings triggered massive antiwar rallies across
the United States.
B. Ending the Vietnam War
1. Henry Kissinger, President Nixon’s national security advisor and
top negotiator in Vietnam, engaged in a series of secret
negotiations with the North Vietnamese, aimed at reaching a
negotiated settlement.
2. The United States and the North Vietnamese finally reached an
armistice: The Paris Accords, January 1973.
3. The United States agreed to withdraw the last of its troops. In
exchange, the North Vietnamese released over five hundred
prisoners of war.
4. Thousands of American prisoners of war remained in Vietnam,
after a secret deal between Nixon and North Vietnam went sour.
Nixon agreed to pay several million dollars to North Vietnam,
but after the initial release of 500 prisoners, there was no further
payment. Today, the organization POW-MIA is committed to
uncovering the whereabouts of these prisoners of war.
2. C. Consequences of the Vietnam War
1. The war affected the economy as follows:
• The United States could not afford both President Johnson’s
Great Society programs and the Vietnam War.
• The combination of spending on the war and expensive social
programs produced the high inflation rates of the late 1960s
and 1970s.
2. The war affected international involvements as follows:
• The Vietnam War increased public skepticism toward
international involvements.
• In 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Act, which
stipulated that the president must inform Congress within
48 hours if U.S. forces are sent into a hostile area without a
declaration of war.
II. Nixon and Détente
A. Background of Détente
1. The United States and the Communist world had been locked in
a Cold War since the end of World War II.
2. The United States and the Soviet Union had experienced a series
of tense Cold War confrontations that included the Berlin Airlift,
the construction of the Berlin Wall, and the Cuban missile crisis.
3. Meanwhile, the United States had not formally recognized the
Chinese Communist government.
4. Nixon and Henry Kissinger believed that the United States
needed a new and more flexible foreign policy.
5. Détente called for a relaxation of tensions between the U. S. and
the Communist world.
B. Détente and China
1. In late 1971, Nixon stunned the nation and the world by
announcing that he intended to visit China, “to normalize
relations between the two countries”
2. Nixon visited Beijing in February 1972. His trip to China
marked a dramatic example of détente.
C. Détente and the Soviet Union
1. Just three months after becoming the first American president to
visit China, Nixon became the first American president to visit
Moscow.
2. Nixon’s visit led to a series of agreement that reduced tensions
between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. The most important
agreements were:
• The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) (These talks
led to the SALT I Treaty, which limited the number of
intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched
missiles each superpower could have in its arsenal.)
• A series of agreements that expanded trade between the two
superpowers.
3. III. Nixon and the New Federalism
A. Background
1. The Great Society programs had led to a dramatic increase in
federal influence and federal spending.
2. Nixon wanted to reduce the size and influence of the federal
government.
B. The New Federalism
1. Known as the New Federalism, Nixon’s plan called for
distributing a portion of federal power to state and local
governments.
2. Under a program called revenue sharing, state and local
governments could spend their federal dollars however the saw
fit, within certain limitations.
Exit Slip: Students will answer the following questions, using complete sentences and in
your own words
1. In 1970, what event triggered massive anti-war rallies across the U.S.?
2. Who was Nixon’s national security advisor and what was his role in ending the
Vietnam War?
3. Name one domestic economic affect of the Vietnam War and one political
affect (this political affect would limit executive powers).
4. What was détente, and how did this affect political relation between the U.S.
and the Soviet Union and China?
5. Explain Nixon’s “New Federalism” and what affect this was intended to have
over the federal government? What Amendment in the Constitution makes this
“New Federalism” plan possible?