Nietzsche Evil

Nietzsche Evil
What is it that makes something good? What is it that makes something evil? These are questions
that were asked by Nietzsche in his work, Beyond Good and Evil. Nietzsche's answers to these
questions were simple; good and evil are ambiguous because they are ultimately subjective. Thus,
good and evil are the same thing; yet at the same time, they are complete opposites. Now, this
statement is radically paradoxical, but I hope to open your mind up to this concept and explain the
importance of recognizing the thin line between good and evil. Everyone's idea of good and evil are
dependent on many things, which is why one person's idea on good and evil cannot be completely
relied on. Relying on one person's interpretation of good and evil leads to total bigotry. One's ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To Nietzsche, good and evil are always subjective, but I believe that there is one thing in this world
full of ambiguity and fogginess that is always good. That thing is the power of human love; and
furthermore expressing that love through unwavering love of our fellow man. Raw human love
cannot possibly be evil. It is the purest, most basic, and most important human emotion to master. If
everyone would just love each other despite our different interpretations of good and evil, the world
would be a much better place. I think that no matter what religion or culture someone is raised in,
love of one another is always regarded as good. Sometimes we all need to be reminded to love our
fellow humans regardless of our religion, political outlook, and ideas of good and evil because they
are subjective. Love exists beyond good and evil. Now let us discuss the counterpart to good; can
anything be inherently evil? Again, Nietzsche would say that nothing is inherently evil, because
good and evil are one in the same, however I once again beg to differ. I believe that the absence of
love is the only truly evil thing in existence. When we forget to love one another,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

William Golding 's Lord Of The Flies Essay
In the past one hundred years, multiple events have led to people questioning the basis of human
nature. The World Wars, 9/11, the Atomic bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, and the Vietnam
War are all just a few instances that challenged the perception of the extent to which humans have
the capacity to maliciously and savagely harm one another. William Golding's Lord of the Flies
serves as a perfect fictional example of such questioning. Set on an island during World War II, a
group of British schoolchildren become stranded on an island and therefore manage to "escape" the
savage war–time conditions at home. However, it quickly becomes evident that savagery abounds
on the island as well. Famous and somewhat nihilistic thinker Friedrich Nietzsche would have had
insightful analysis regarding the interactions in Golding's Lord of the Flies, in particular with regard
to some of the boys' desire to obtain power, the assertion of different moralities onto the boys' lives,
and the power struggles that highlight the tale. One aspect of the Lord of the Flies which Nietzsche
would have valuable insight into would be the boys desire to obtain power once they are stranded on
the island. After being stranded, there is a power vacuum such that is rarely present in the real
world. In this power vacuum, a few of the boys show immediate desire for power. The boys that
wish to be the chief of the group are Jack, Ralph, and Piggy. Jack is described as "the most obvious
leader," in Piggy's

The Consequences Of Beyond Good And Evil
The driving force behind Beyond Good and Evil is Nietzsche's insight into human psychology and
its consequences regarding traditional philosophical methods. The main points that support this
fundamental idea are found in the Preface and Part 1, particularly Aphorism 23. Although Nietzsche
does not present his ideas in the form of clear arguments (with premises and conclusions) the
following are characterizations what I believe to be the thrust of his main points. First, we are all
born with innate desires from which we cannot escape, as they are biologically built into our
psychology. These desires drive all action and thought, including all philosophical reasoning. Futher,
these desires can be boiled down to one fundamental will, the will

Michael Lackey Beyond Good And Evil
In Michael Lackey's essay, Beyond Good and Evil: Huckleberry Finn on Human Intimacy, Lackey
argues that Mark Twain 's novel, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn seeks to destroy and abolish
morality and considers morality socially, psychology, and politically destructive. While I agree with
Lackeys points that accepting morality means rejecting friendship and accepting friendship means
rejecting morality, in the case of Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. I don't believe such an argument
adequately addresses the base of morality and human culture. In the course of this essay I will argue
that morality isn't a perfect pinnacle to base all thoughts and ideas off, but it is not a bad tool either.
Lackey and Twain argue that morality is evil and as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe that Aunt Sally or another character, if they knew, would have stepped in and stopped
Tom's antics. I don't think the way Tom acted reflects the morals per say, of a majority of people in
this era, rather a "game" of a child. With that being said I do think that the view of morality that
most people during this time had, allowed them to have and control slaves without feeling guilty.
One of Lackeys major points in his essay is that Huck ultimately has to make the choice between
friendship and morality. If Huck wants to be moral that means he can't free Jim, and if Huck want's
to have a friendship with Jim then he will suffer a loss of morality. We witness Huck with this tough
decision throughout the novel. When Jim is talking about his family and how he's going to work his
way to free them, and if that doesn't work, steal them. We see Huck 's inner turmoil.
What had poor Mrs. Watson done to you, that you could see her nigger go off right under your eyes
and never say a single word? What did that poor old woman do to you, that you could treat her so
mean? Why, she tried to learn you your book, she tried to learn you your manners, she tried to be
good to you every way she knew how. That 's what she done. (Twain 82)
Huck is clearly

Comparing Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
In "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche reveals the two primary forms of morality, this would be the
master morality and slave morality. In the lecture we discussed Nietzche's fatalism he believed that
events people are fated, so each individual is fated to either have a master or slave type morality.
The master morality is the morality of the people, who are strong willed people. The 'good' is the
strong, powerful and the noble, whereas the 'evil' is the cowardly, powerless and meek. The essence
of the master morality is dignity, bravery, honesty and sense of self–worth. That is to say that it takes
the good and the bad are equivalent to nobility and shame. Master morality is the essentially the
affirming morality. The Master morality affirms life, it is the here and now, and it is like nature and
instincts. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The virtues are kindness, sympathy and humanity these are the most useful characteristics for
supporting the burden of the existence, slave morality views independence as evil. Nietzsche
believed we should allow those being capable of affirming masters to do so while those who are
unable to affirm to the master morality are bound to be slaves, this was brought up in the lecture on

Friedrich Nietzsche: The Gay Science, Beyond Good And Evil
Friedrich Nietzsche was born to Karl Ludwig Nietzsche and Franziska Nietzsche on October 15,
1844 in a quite village in the eastern part of Germany. He did exceptionally well at school and
university and so excelled at ancient Greek that he was made a professor at University of Basel at
very young age. During his lifetime he published many masterpiece books like The Birth of
Tragedy, The Gay Science, Beyond Good and Evil, and Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Nietzsche was an
existentialist philosopher. Extentialism is all about an individual. Social institutions such as religion
traditionally impose values on people who accept these values as inherently good and worthy of
pursuing. However, in Nietzsche's world, God is dead and can no longer provide ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Secondly, Nietzsche's philosophy mostly focuses on the individual so much that taking notes of
others let alone pressing them is not and never was a part of it. Ubermensche is too busy great about
him or her individuality to care what happens to others. Finally, Nazi Germany was fascist, meaning
the government has no interest in individuals or their values and rights. Nazis were uncaring about
the lives of the individuals and were willing to kill as many individuals as was necessary to achieve
their group's advantage. Individuals were defined by their group identity and were seen only as
vehicles through which groups achieve their interests. To them individuals were merely servants of
the groups to which they belong. Anti individualism of the Nazis was most blatant in their treatment
of Jews, whom they did not see as individuals with moral significance and

Nietzsche Beyond Good And Evil Summary
Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher who believed that master morality was the superior
morality as opposed to slave morality. He starts in the selection of "In Beyond Good and Evil" by
saying "To refrain mutually from injury, from violence, from exploitation and put one's will on par
with that of others: this may result in a certain rough sense in good conduct among individuals when
the necessary conditions are given..." Nietzsche explains here that if everyone could just treat each
other equally, the world would be a lot better. In his opinion, those who believe this refuse to believe
what this way of thinking really is, which is "a Will to the denial of life". At this point, one has to
think very deeply to the basis and must resist all sentimental weakness. Nietzsche says that "life
itself is ESSENTIALLY appropriation, injury, conquest of the strange and weak, suppression,
severity, obtrusion of peculiar forms, incorporation, and at the least, putting it mildest, exploitation,"
but why should these words be used specifically when we live in a world where for ages the world
has been marked with a disparaging purpose? People in a society treat each other in an equal manor.
This type of behavior is taken place in almost every healthy aristocracy. If the society considered
itself a healthy and not a dying society, and continues to maintain a positive outlook of things and
refrain from doing negative things within the society, then the society will be the "incarnated

Comparison Of Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
Nihilism is a philosophy often associated with Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher. The main
idea of Nietzsche's nihilism is to separate from all of one's values. This basically means to leave all
of one's knowledge behind and start from scratch. This kind of thinking could also be compared to
Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil." A part of Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" is the free spirit
of the soul. This means that the mind should never become too attached to one point of view and
must often jump from viewpoint to viewpoint. This is similar to Nietzsche's view of nihilism
because Nietzsche repeatedly tells the reader that in order to become nihilist, one must separate from
their values completely, and start with a clean slate. The

Nietzsche Good And Evil
In the first essay of On The Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche states clearly his stand that "Beyond
Good and Evil... does not mean "Beyond Good and Bad"" (Nietzsche, page 143). Nietzsche makes
the distinction between good/bad, and good/evil, by delineating the central idea that what is good
and evil generally carries a morality to its definitions, whereas the former is essentially a social
construct with slanted purposes and no true objectivity to its meanings. Nietzsche frames the idea
that the values of good and bad, are fundamental to how we involve morality in our thinking,
namely, how we assess what is good and what is evil.
Nietzsche introduces the initial concepts of what is good to be determined by those who have
benefitted from unegoistical ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It does not find its root and origin in objective circumstances; it originates from a place of
suppression, of seeking freedom, and most significantly, of ressentiment. Herein the idea Nietzsche
proposes is that the slaves are responsive against their noble masters because they are weak and
impotent, leading to the festering of hatred and resentment. This means that values culminating from
the revolt would be inaccurate in representing the true meaning of "good" or "evil", because they
were formed through the tainted lens of the slaves of ressentiment. They would portray the slaves,
the weak, and the powerless as "good" and favourable, while casting the nobles, the masters, and the
upperclassmen in an "evil" and malicious light. This inverts the original notion that the nobles are
the definition of "good". Nietzsche expounds this situation by clarifying that the nobles become
"blond beast[s]" (Nietzsche, page 128) when out of their familiar circumstances, insinuating that
they turn into a barbaric state where they seek victory over those who are inferior to them. In turn,
displays of brutality will be expressed, as a by–product of this barbarism and therefore, fulfilling the
morality of the nobles as "evil". Nietzsche also expresses that this form of morality may not always
be beneficial; it cages the

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: Beyond Good And Evil
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia in 1929. He attended Morehouse College
and upon his graduation he chose to go in the route of his father to pursue Baptist Ministry. Dr. King
wanted us all to be treated fairly; he was influenced by Mohandas Gandhi's philosophy of
nonviolence and was convinced that all African Americans should utilize his powerful words as a
new way of an equal life. Dr. King was a civil rights activist, who believed in transcendence, that
right and wrong do exist. His powerful words given during his I have a dream speech led him to
earn the Noble Peace Prize. Friedrich Nietzsche was born in Röcken, Prussia in 1844. In 1864 he
enrolled in the University of Bonn to study theology. He began to doubt his ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
There is only a strong man in his eyes that the society has progressed from. In Beyond Good and
Evil, Nietzsche says that to keep our society, only powerful people should join together because
respecting the weak causes the powerful to become weak, and will result in a weak society. In order
to live, the strong crushes the weak to stay dominant because in history the strong are the ones that
always win. One of Nietzsche moralities was slave, which was the term that identified the weak
individuals. In Nietzsche eyes, people with power exploit the weak, and if the strong honors the
weak then the strong will get weaker and destroy the society. Friedrich supported the master
morality, stating that dominating people defines good in a person, and that you are masters of other
people. He only helped others to better himself, not because he has sympathy on the weak.
Nietzsche is just making claims and giving no proof. He assumes the strong makes a better society.
He wanted us to look to the past and see the strong always win, and we should not look at the future,
at things that will destroy society. Nietzsche believed, only show respect to the strong. He
contradicts himself saying there are no standards but creates standards by saying, strong should get
their way. He has no logic, just

In Beyond Good And Evil
The most widespread story in human history describes the horrors of Nazi Germany. Recreated in
novels, movies, writings, and theatre, this brutal tragedy is familiar in the minds of all. Seemingly
enthralled by the captivating tale, our interminable interest in the Nazis is habitual, neurotic, and
borderline obsessive. Why does it so easily capture our attention? Observers figure that this macabre
story signifies the lowest of lows in our pathetic and quondam attempt to be "sivilized." Perhaps our
fascination with this historic tale lies in the baseless optimism that our whole world may soon
experience a Damascene conversion. After the impending growth and development of Greece and
Rome following their advancement in the fields of science and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As, "methods of teaching improve," it became, "possible to reach the frontier of knowledge," much
faster than ever before. As many expected, "scientific advance to continue...it increasingly
attract[ed] the best brains." With so many progressions in numerous fields, knowledge became
accessible to the masses. Unfortunately, the, "explosive forces," generated by this new information
made it, "impossible to preserve the kind of society in which science can flourish." Here, Russell
describes the, "arrival of science in an environment that [was] not ripe for it." Typically such
innovation would be a period of growth in the positive direction, however it was much the opposite
now that, "modern states," had to, "compete for nuclear physicists." Regrettably this new
information was now being used for corrupt purposes. Additionally, it began raising questions that
took us, "beyond the sphere of science," and into the, "imaginative understanding of mass
phycology," along with their, "ethics and moral codes." While advancements were being made,
"science...cannot supply us with an ethic," and we were left at a loss. In search of a, "somewhat
different moral code from the one inherited by the past," we were led back, once again, to science. It
may not be able to give us virtue,

Summary Of Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
Friedrich Nietzsche was born in 1844 and died in 1900. He was born in Rocken, Prussia, attended
Lutheran boarding school in Pforta, and graduated in 1864. He enrolled in the university of Bonn to
study theology and soon after changing his views on religion and becoming an atheist, he transferred
to the University Leipzig to study classical philology. He was known for his many important works
in philology and became a professor at Basel in 1869. Nietzsche saw society as will to power. His
model of reality was materialism. He believed in human law and therefore believed that the weak
created natural law to benefit themselves because they were unable to defend themselves. Martin
Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia in 1929 and died in 1968. He attended college at
Morehouse college and soon wanted to become a Baptist minister like his father. Shortly after
graduating from college in 1948 he attended a seminary at Chester, Pennsylvania and then received
his bachelor of divinity degree in 1955. While King worked on his doctoral degree he became a
Baptist minister and became very involved in the civil rights movement. King wrote Letter from
Birmingham Jail while confined in Birmingham jail for leading a demonstration protesting
segregation. King believed that everyone was created equal and that our laws should reflect our
equal rights. He believed in the transcendence model of reality.
In Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche writes about how he views

Fredrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
Fredrich Nietzsche is considered by the masses to be revolutionary in both his career as an author
and a philosopher as he had a tremendous impact on the twentieth century up and even today.
However, Nietzsche's views were highly unlike other popular beliefs and conventional beliefs of his
time. Almost all of his published works were, and still are, considered controversial. His
philosophies are more than just controversial and unconventional viewpoints, however; they are
extreme and dangerous if taken out of context or misinterpreted. One of Nietzsche's most notable
works, Beyond Good and Evil expresses his views on daily society and the hierarchical classes it
holds, the master and the slave. He states that the two are in constant battle

Pollution and Environment Essay
Man Must Dominate Nature and the Environment
How shall we deal with the environment? is an ethical question much discussed, but rarely answered
with any well–thought–out justifications. Rather, individuals attempting to answer it have often
made claims stating that certain things are "obvious." In this paper, I intend to analyze one of these
ethical principles which is considered to be inherently obvious. For every culture has regarded
certain things as "obvious" and needing no further explanation –– and every culture differs vastly on
what it considers to be an "obvious truth." Thus, it seems that these "truths" are not, in themselves,
"obvious." Rather, they require further scrutiny to determine their validity. Hence, in this ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We must still eat, sleep, and eliminate waste. We also have the same drives; the base upon which our
essential physical natures are built is not much different from the drives of a monkey, for instance,
or a whale. Nietzsche described the nature of the drives and desires of a species in Beyond Good
and Evil. He said,
if it is a living and not a dying body ... it will have to be an incarnate will to power, it will strive to
grow, spread, seize, become predominant –– not from any morality or immorality but because it is
living and because life simply is will to power. (Good and Evil 259)
If we, like other animals, have a life which "simply is will to power," and that this will to power
expresses itself through the desire to grow, to expand, and to dominate, then to stifle this with a
claim of "morality" is to commit a slow species–wide suicide by refusing humanity the ability to
participate in the expression of the will to power which life "simply is."
Other animals, which also have a will to power (as that is what life "simply is"), are most certainly
not concerned with environmental ethics. If an organism is introduced into a new ecosystem, it will
"strive to grow, spread, seize, become predominant" until the ecosystem evolves a new balance. The
organism does not practice an ethic of self–regulation "for the good of the ecosystem"; to do so
would be suicidal for that organism.

Nietzsche Beyond Good And Evil Analysis
The Treatment of the Vulnerable: A Comparative Analysis of Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil
with King's Letter from Birmingham Jail Are there vulnerable people in Society? Yes, there are
vulnerable people in society. Some examples of vulnerable people are: the elderly, uneducated
citizens, the mentally handicapped, children, the poor, disabled veterans, women and prisoners.
Unfortunately, this is an age–old problem; it is not brand new. How can we help the vulnerable
people? We will look at this by comparing Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Young and Evil and A
Letter from Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr. Nietzsche wants an aristocracy that beats
down the weak because he believes in the Ubermensch, also known as the super man. ... Show more
Nietzsche also claims that Democracy is basically insane and that Communism doesn't work
because that's not life (Nietzsche 259). Nietzsche believes that there's two moralities: the master and
the slave. He believes that you need to keep them apart and that they should not mix at all!
Nietzsche wants people like Achilles: proud, noble and despicable. To him, nobles create value,
especially himself because his likes or dislikes are the only things that are truly valuable. Nietzsche
believes that Christianity is a slave morality, meaning that slaves create their own morality to get
through life. He also claims that poor people are liars and that the Aristocrats should not trust them
(Nietzsche 260). Reason being: the weak use the powerful just like the powerful uses the weak.
Unfortunately for him, he violates the principle of non–contradiction by making this claim. At the
time that King was protesting, the blacks were being mistreated by the whites. The blacks were
being beaten and humiliated. They also had to deal with segregation. King's own daughter couldn't
go to an amusement park, Fun town, because only white people could go there. King was peacefully
protesting for the weak, not just for black people only. He also believes in the civil rule: don't treat
people the way you don't want to be treated, which is in agreement with the principle of non–
contradiction. White people were treating black

Beyond Good And Evil By Joshua Lohin
Art is a form of communication. Art is a form of language. The language of art can be elaborated in
a multitude of ways, as well. These methods include the content, process, or themes of the artwork.
The pieces "Who Tells the Truth?" and "Beyond Good and Evil" by Joshua Lohin, which I found in
the University Gallery, Fulton Hall 109, are prime examples of art being conveyed as a language
through their content.
Firstly, the artwork "Who Tells the Truth?" by Joshua Lohin, is a digital print, depicting a woman
standing with what appears to be an opaque veil over her head. The female figure's body is turned
slightly away from the viewer, while her head is facing the viewer. The figure stands in an
ostensibly grainy photograph with the words ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This piece illustrates two faces, one smiling and the other frowning, accompanied by words placed
around the print in a seemingly random order. The two faces are placed in the center of the print,
while the words, "Beyond," "Good," "and," and "Evil," are positioned around the edges of the print.
"Beyond" is printed horizontally, and "Good" is printed vertically with the base of the word being
faced toward the right end of the print. "And" is printed on the bottom left corner of the print, with
the left end of the print as the base, and "Evil" is printed in the same manner as "Beyond" in the
bottom right side of the print. Located around the faces in the center are smaller printed words
being, "originality," "danger," "imagination," and "self–assertion." I believe that perhaps the content
in this print could be insinuating human demeanors as well. The smiling and frowning faces in the
center are associated with the human expressions of smiling and frowning. Additionally, the words
that are positioned around the faces describe human qualities. This could also be illustrated by the
saying, "Smiling faces tell lies." The quote tells that individuals can obscure their true emotions and
feelings with their facial expressions. This piece appears to be much more simple than the previous
one, however many similarities and differences between the two can be

Beyond Good and Evil Essay
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche discusses how he is not a believer in democracy. The principles
of democracy were put together by levelers, or people that believe in democracy. These principles
lead to equality that restrains life to one universal truth and Nietzsche did not agree with this idea at
all. He believed that these principles caused people to form into one large herd. In this herd, people
follow one another with no will to power, which results in the downfall of individual rights and
instincts. This makes the herd the definition of morality in society, which Nietzsche disagrees with.
But he brings up the idea of neighbor love. Neighbor love is the idea that we are all in one herd so
we are all equal which creates us to all ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Levelers are the people who have put democracy into effect. The levelers submit to one universal
happiness and truth that is not absolute. According to Nietzsche, these people are "stupid, brutish,
and bullish" (26) because they praise or blame an action due to its morals. Nietzsche believes we
need to overcome our morals and recognize our intentions and motives for our actions. Our
assumptions and prejudices in a democratic society make us ignore our true deep thoughts because
people conform into one group or heard that believe in the same ideas and morals. In a herd of a
people, no one is greater than anyone else. Nietzsche believes that our true instincts are our motives
for action and if we ignore them then we are only conforming to a herd. It may be "awkward and
difficult for the ear to hear something new; we are bad at listening to unfamiliar music"(81), but we
should not be afraid to experience "more morality" (81). I believe that more morality means that
morality needs to be expanded to a combination of ideas from the past, even if the go against the
morals in place. Not everyone has the will to experience more morality; therefore, in Nietzsche's
society these people would fail because people are too afraid to adjust to something new. In the pre–
moral period, they would be considered slaves because somebody must suffer for success to be
achieved. The thought of the herd is to praise the people that may fail and suffer in Nietzsche's

Nietzsche 's On The Genealogy Of Morals Essay
Friedrich Nietzsche's book "On the Genealogy of Morals" critiques and examines the origin of
human morals. Nietzsche presents numerous strong arguments in this book against society 's moral
implications, however, it is his concepts of slave and master morality which are seen repeatedly.
These two concepts of master and slave morality are particularly evident in the movie Fight Club.
Although Fight Club is a modern–day movie, its storyline and subject matter reveals that it was
heavily influence by Nietzsche's concept of slave and master morality. Nietzsche first introduces the
concept of slave and master morality in the chapter about "Good, bad and evil". He explains it as a
society which is split into two, where a "militarily and politically dominant group of 'masters'
exercises absolute control over a completely subordinate group of 'slaves" (xx). Thus, the slaves
become the abused, oppressed, and weak– what he refers to as slave morality. Meanwhile, the
masters are the noble human beings who determine what is good and bad based on their own
values– which he defines as master morality. This group of people do not set values and morals, but
create them. They use the term "good" when referring to themselves, and use the term "bad" when
referring to the "slaves", "who by virtue are of their weakness are not capable of living the life of
self–affirming physical exuberance" (Nietzsche 1884). Correspondingly, the slaves end up
developing hatred for their masters and

Critical Analysis Of Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good And...
In a selection from "Beyond Good and Evil", Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher and
philologist critiques the secular and religious moralities as having similar origins. In the beginning
of "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche says that if the world was "to refrain mutually from injury,
from violence, from exploitation, and put one's will on a par with that of others", it would result in
somewhat of a sense in good conduct between people, if the conditions necessary to do so are given.
Nietzsche explains that these conditions are "the actual similarity of the individuals in amount of
force and degree of worth, and their co–relation within one organization." He pretty much says that
for there to be good conduct between people, these ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To Nietzsche, life is pretty much the Will to Power. Nietzsche transitions to talk about the European
outlook on the matter. Nietzsche states "the ordinary consciousness of Europeans more unwilling to
be corrected than on this matter, people now rave everywhere, even under the guise of science,
about coming conditions of society in which the exploiting character is to be absent." Here, he's
basically saying that Europeans seem to be so stubborn on this matter because they don't want to be
corrected. They don't understand that time is changing and don't want to accept it either. To
Nietzsche, this sounds like the Europeans have created a type of life where they reject all natural
functions in the world. The term "exploitation" does not belong to an imperfect society with many
problems within it. It belongs to the living being as a primary natural function. As a consequence, it
is a part of the Will to Power, which leads to the Will to Life. Nietzsche believes that this is a
fundamental fact and people should be honest towards themselves about this matter. When
observing the many types of moralities presented to him, Nietzsche found traits that reappear in
many of the moralities presented to him. These traits showed up regularly together and connected
with each other. He connected all of these traits until there were only two types of moralities that
was

Nietzsche Nihilism
The 1859 publication of Darwin's On the Origin of Species had dramatic consequences, among them
the creation of doubt about God's place in a world where species independently evolve and
continually change. Darwin had not merely questioned God; he had shaken one of the core Christian
beliefs: that God had created a flawless and unchanging earth. When Darwin's ideas were not
scientifically disproven, the basis of Christianity itself was called into question. That questioning
continued as scientific discovery advanced. The traditional view and place of God became less and
less applicable to modern life, triggering an onset of nihilism in many as the foundations of their
lives were chipped away by scientific progress. Scholars and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Gooding–Williams identifies two essential reasons for this "desertifying" effect of Christian–
Platonic values on life. First, "they identify as wrong or sinful" certain aspects of human life that
Nietzsche thinks are vital (34). For example, this vaue system discourages willing and value–
creation by claiming all authority in those areas. As a result, these instincts are repressed in humans,
who "would rather will nothingness than not will," finally resulting in a denial of life, which is seen
as unhealthy by Nietzsche (Nietzsche, On the Geneaology of Morals 163). Second, they "favor ...
the universal rule of one and only one value scheme," blocking efforts by individuals to exercise
their natural wills to power by creating their own values (Gooding–Williams 35).
Out in that desert, the camel sheds his load, and becomes the lion spirit. Unlike the obedient, load–
bearing camel, the lion asserts his own will and "lordship in its own wilderness" (Nietzsche, Thus
Spake Zarathustra). In order to truly become his own master as he desires, the lion must triumph
over the dragon, representative of the God and value system he is deserting, which claims that "[a]ll
values have already been created, and all created values – do I represent" (Nietzsche, Thus Spake
Zarathustra). Since both lion and dragon claim sole authority over the creation and valuation of all
possible values, one must defeat the other:

Nietzsche: Moving Beyond Good and Evil Essay
Nietzsche: Moving Beyond Good and Evil
We have grown weary of man. Nietzsche wants something better, to believe in human ability once
again. Nietzsche's weariness is based almost entirely in the culmination of ressentiment, the
dissolution of Nietzsche's concept of morality and the prevailing priestly morality. Nietzsche wants
to move beyond simple concepts of good and evil, abandon the assessment of individuals through
ressentiment, and restore men to their former wonderful ability.
Nietzsche begins his discussion of good and moral with an etymological assessment of the
designations of "good" coined in various languages. He "found they all led back to the same
conceptual transformation–that everywhere 'noble,' ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While the priests were in the minority in terms of power, they were in the majority in terms of
public opinion, and in gathering the majority together, they declared "the wretched alone are the
good; the poor, impotent, lowly alone are the good; the suffering, deprived, sick, ugly alone are
pious, alone are blessed by God, blessedness is for them alone..." (Nietzsche 912). Nietzsche
describes the common belief here as nothing other than ressentiment, the concept of the mirror
image of morality.
For Nietzsche, "the slave revolt in morality begins when ressentiment itself becomes creative and
gives birth to values: the ressentiment of natures that are denied the true reaction, that of deeds, and
compensate themselves with an imaginary revenge." (Nietzsche 913). This imaginary revenge
causes the complete reversal in defining words of class. The resentful slaves and priests looked up at
the nobility with anger, characterizing them as selfish, corrupted, abusive and tyrannical, among
other things. Ultimately, they came to the conclusion that the nobility were the pinnacle of evil. In
doing so, "he has conceived 'the evil enemy,' 'the Evil One,' and this in fact is his basic concept,
from which he then evolves, as an afterthought and pendant, a 'good one'–himself!" (Nietzsche 915).
Through the venomous eye of ressentiment, the slave class has characterized the good men, those
with strong moral character as evil, and in doing so, has

The World 's Deepest Thinkers
Friedrich Nietzsche is considered one of the Western world's deepest thinkers because he calls so
many things into question. He felt that everyone would benefit greatly by questioning everything. In
1887 he wrote On the Genealogy of Morality to expand on his ideas he expressed through Beyond
Good and Evil. On the Genealogy of Morality consists of three different essays that question and
critique the value of our moral judgements. The first and the one I will focus on, being 'Good and
Evil', 'Good and Bad,' in which Nietzsche discusses how goodness is relative to the eye of the
beholder. He specifies two different types of groups, the first group being the militaristic and
political group, which he has deemed the "masters." The "masters" view "good" as having the
characteristics of strength, power, freedom and achievement. The second group being the "slaves,"
which is the group that is controlled by the masters. The slaves viewing "good" as having the
characteristics of sympathy, charity, forgiveness, and humility. The characteristics that the "masters"
deemed "good," like strength and power, were used as sources for fear against the "slaves" and thus
were deemed evil. He feels that the "slaves" deem the things the "masters" view as good as evil
because of the resentment they have. It is men of a noble rank that Nietzsche determines has the
"master morality." These are powerful, healthy and courageous men that are essentially barbaric to
those they claim to be beneath them.

Essay on On the Genealogy of Morality
Friedrich Nietzsche's "On the Genealogy of Morality" includes his theory on man's development of
"bad conscience." Nietzsche believes that when transitioning from a free–roaming individual to a
member of a community, man had to suppress his "will to power," his natural "instinct of freedom"
(59). The governing community threatened its members with punishment for violation of its laws, its
"morality of customs," thereby creating a uniform and predictable man (36). With fear of
punishment curtailing his behavior, man was no longer allowed the freedom to indulge his every
instinct. He turned his aggressive focus inward, became ashamed of his natural animal instincts,
judged himself as inherently evil, and developed a bad conscience (46). ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Man's development of "bad conscience" is a complicated process that sees its beginnings in slave
morality's doubling of the doer and the deed. According to Nietzsche, the slave (the weaker man)
had developed ressentiment towards the noble (the stronger man), labeling the noble as evil and
blaming him for slave's suffering (20–22). The slave separated the noble (the doer) from his
instinctive actions (the deeds) and claimed the noble possessed "free will;" the slave believed "the
strong are free to be weak" (26). The slave set up the ideal of his own weak and passive instincts
being "good" and the strong and active instincts of the nobles being "evil" (26–27). As stated by
JHarden, when defining his weakness as good, "the slave turned [his] natural condition of suffering
at the hands of others into a condition which should be desired" (JHarden). As religions developed,
and the slave morality became dominant, this ideal of good and evil prevailed and forced man to
become conscious of his instincts as separate from himself, something he could control.
In Nietzsche's account, the original free–roaming man lacked memory. To be happy and to not hold
on to the pain of unpleasant memories, man possessed an "active ability" to forget (36). Man's
memory developed as he formed relationships and began making promises to repay debts to his
creditors. He had to remember to repay on time or face the pain of punishment – a pain that the
creditor of this relationship took

Memory in Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil
In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond
basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal
intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book,
Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human
morality. Nietzsche's 68th epigram dictates: "'I have done that,' says my memory. 'I cannot have
done that,' says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually––memory yields." When assessing
this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result,
but also what would occur if we didn't. One could argue that we must ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"...The intention...still requires interpretation––moreover, a sign that means too much and therefore,
almost nothing." (Nietzsche, 44) Because of this, he concludes that much more is concretely said in
our unintentional actions. The first notion shows an individual that intentionally recalls their
mistakes and unintentionally becomes part of a cycle of guilt that prevents moral progression. The
second shows an individual who unintentionally yields his memory to his pride and is, as a result
pushed forward. Because of Nietzsche's stressed importance of consequences and actions rather than
the intentions of an individual, it is clear that although the notion of remembering our mistakes may
be considered worthy, the second interpretation provides a far more morally strong and
consequential reality. Beyond the question of intention and consequences, one must also wonder
how important the accuracy of one's memory is to how they react to it. When thinking about
morality and guilt, it would seem as if honesty would be one of the most, if not the most important
factor. But if a memory is untrue or inaccurate, how does that factor into its eventual succession to
pride? similarly to his response to general moral philosophy, Nietzsche also admonishes the idea of
objective truth and recognizes untruth as a "condition of life." Nietzsche rejects the idea of repelling
what is untrue stating that we must accept

The Effects Of Evil By Hannah Arendt
Hannah Arndt announced the period of evil during the execution of Adolf Ishman of 1961, a Nazi
officer who accuses Europe of the systematic destruction of the Jews. Arendt himself was a Jewish–
German exile who was fighting in the most personal way to be a victim of the total destruction of
European society. In a series of articles in The New Yorker, which later became Eichmann in
Jerusalem: A Report on the Evil Channel, Arndt tried to deal with many questions that were not
necessarily answered by the lawsuit. His conclusions were profound: those who do wrong are not
necessarily monsters; Sometimes he is just a bureaucrat, Hamman observed in the trial that he had
no talent or was a sociopath. The court psychiatrist described him as "a completely normal man, in
any case, I am more than after having investigated him". Evil, Andyd has suggested, otherwise it can
be an extraordinary job done by indispensable people. He insisted that there is only depth in good,
that good can be abolished; Evil can never be eradicated, it can only be extreme, because it has no
depth or demonic dimension and scares. It can spread like a mushroom on the surface of the earth
and can ruin the whole world. The evil is in the thought is the product of failure is to try to
collaborate with the evil, as that quick thinking and local controls and principles emanating from, in
which you are disappointed that you do nothing. The state is beyond good evil, they believe that "the
whole structure of Western

Nietzsche Slave Morality
The slave mortality presented by Nietzsche in his Genealogy of Morals is prevalent within modern
literature. The dark effects of this morality have crept far beyond the general view of the elite class
and into our writing. This is not much of a surprise since literature reflects the world and our view of
the world within it. Unfortunately, its impact on our society is shown by its prevalence within
modern writing. This morality allows the author to focus on the "evil enemy" (Nietzsche 39) instead
of the good within humanity. This obsession with the negativity within the world has become a
theme within humanities writing. Every good story must have some conflict some evil that is tearing
at the good and often innocent. And it is true, that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The standard of living is the highest it has ever been, the rate at which new technologies are being
produced is truly amazing. The problem with the slave morality is not its existence but its
prevalence. This is where Nietzsche observations have some reality. It is true that the slave mentality
is widespread and that thousands of years have made it hard to look past such a mentality but
Nietzsche argument that it started with the jews is questionable at best. The mythology that comes
long before the influence of Judeo–Christian influence spread throughout the western world and it
always has monsters or evil royalty that must be destroyed. The hero is good because they are not
monsters and because they remove the monsters. The monsters are just like the birds of prey the
truth is that entirety of the human race was a lamb. That mentality allowed us to survive the
treacherous world and eventually change it to fit our purpose. In order to achieve this humankind
has to take as much as they could that way our frail bodies could survive. This take still has a place
in the culture that we face today and in a lot of ways it has no place.
Both of the plays The Good Woman of Setzuan by Bertolt Brecht and Trifles by Susan Glaspell
depict worlds that are full of evil. In Trifles, a woman murders her husband and two of her friends
justify it by using the slave 's morality. He took away her

Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
Though relatively unknown during his lifetime, German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche became a
household name in the century after his death. The provocative nature of his claims entice many, and
none more famously than the philosophers of Nazi Germany. During their reign, he was treated as a
prophet of sorts, and was the only philosopher whose likeness was in a photograph with Adolf
Hitler.1 Many of his concepts were used in Nazi propaganda, and this intimate connection to one of
the world's most sinister regimes has wreaked havoc on his legacy. However, perhaps the most
common view of Nietzsche, even more common than the connection itself, is that the Nazis horribly
misrepresented and perverted his philosophy to suit their needs.2 Without ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As has been shown several times, they used his arguments for eugenics to support existing racial
biases and to legitimize their plan to systematically murder along those lines. What must be ignored
to apply Nietzschean philosophy to those ideas of German supremacy are the many quotes mocking
Germany and praising the "inferior" races, particularly the Jews. While some supporters argue that
Nietzsche's criticism would not have applied to Hitler's Germany, some of his work cannot easily be
explained away. In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche describes Germany as, "a people that suffers
and wants to suffer from national nervous fever and political ambition: for instance, among present–
day Germans there is alternately the anti–French folly, the anti–Semitic folly, the anti–Polish folly,
the Christian–romantic folly..."20 Nietzsche views these types of prejudice, notably similar to the
list of groups targeted by Hitler, as a weakness, an example of ressentiment, as the Germans are too
timid to assert themselves and therefore must blame their failures on others. Not only does he call
anti–Semitism foolish, but he is also seen praising Jews and their superiority over Germans. In the
same breath as his criticisms of Germany, he states, "The Jews are beyond all doubt the strongest,
toughest and purest race now living in Europe. ... It is certain that if they desired–or if they were
driven to it, as the anti–Semites seem to wish–the Jews could now have the ascendancy, nay, literally
the supremacy, over Europe."21 The only thing that the Jews are missing in this case is a true will to
power, which he later acknowledges may be a tactical decision due to the anti–Semitic environment.
Given his adoration of self–accomplished people, why wouldn't he appreciate a group who has
managed to carve a niche into the very societies that have turned against them again

The Logical Problem Of Evil
The logical problem of evil is often referred to as the inconsistent triad, this being that the following
propositions; God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and evil exists, are inconsistent. Also known as a
reduction ad absurdum argument, whereby all three propositions cannot be true together. Theists,
like Swinburne, come to the conclusion that the three propositions are compatible with one another,
whereas atheists, like Mackie, believe that they are incompatible and therefore God does not exist. I
shall be arguing in line with Swinburne's view, describing the following defenses, indicating that
there is no logical problem of evil.
Firstly, I shall summaries Mackie's main argument, which stems from the Paradox of Omnipotence.
Mackie believes that the belief of God being omnipotent is incoherent, as it leads to limitations
being set upon Gods powers. This is illustrated through the paradox of the stone; can God create a
stone so heavy that he cannot lift it? Both opposing outcomes lead to the conclusion that God is not
omnipotent. Thus, being similar to Hume's stance, in that if God were to be both willing and able,
why is there evil in the world? God cannot be semi–omnipotent as this contradicts his very nature.
However, Descartes believed that God can do the illogical, as he is the very source of it and so has
the power to suspend or enhance it whenever he pleases. This would imply he can make all
propositions true, even if they are contradictory. No one can ever understand

In Beyond Good and Evil Nietzsche argues philosophy is a mere self–serving vanity on the part of
historical philosophers. Their explanations and truth–seeking are only their deepest desires of how
they wish things to have originated from. In this paper, I will try to explain what Nietzsche thought
philosophers were doing when constructing their theories and why his argument is a good one. In
Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche begins to ask why humans seek the truth and if it actually is a
benefit to our lives. Arguably, metaphysicians are trying to give things of higher value a separate
origin of their own, which many of the early philosophers believed could not come from our
physical world. Consequently instead of looking at the "seductive, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The past philosophers made claims which they later tried to defend with logical reasoning. What
philosophers have done is to come up with an answer to a question which seems unanswerable
through their theories. These philosophers then create a whole list of reasons about why their
theories are correct. If someone comes along and begins to criticize their theories, they begin to
complain and start to argue why their theory is correct and cannot be wrong. These philosophers
begin to feel threatened in a way because on their theories begin to get attacked. Philosophers have
put immense time into their philosophical achievements and believe them to be the best way to get
to knowledge. Nietzsche says that what philosophers are expressing is "a type of involuntary and
self–conscious memoir." When philosophers create their theories, they make them according to what
they believe to be true or want to be true. It is actually a person's values which dictate their theories
and use the theories as a way to secretly express their inner views to the masses. Philosophers might
not realize they are doing this as they are making their theories with good intentions. As Nietzsche
says he does not believe that a "drive for knowledge" is what gave birth for philosophy. In the case
of Plato we could say that the reason he created the theory of the forms is because he values order.
Plato thus

Friedrich Nietzsche 's Beyond Good And Evil
Many people have wondered why they were here and what they were meant to do with their lives.
This question is one that Friedrich Nietzsche tries to answer in Beyond Good and Evil. In this book
Nietzsche claims that the purpose of life is the "will to power." The will to power is the will of men
to be in charge of others and to be in control. Suppose, finally, we succeeded in explaining our entire
instinctive life as the development and ramification of one basic form of the will––– namely of the
will to power, as my proposition has it; suppose all organic functions could be traced back to this
will to power and one could also find in it the solution of the problem of procreation and
nourishment––– it is one problem––– then one would have gained the right to determine all efficient
force univocally as––– will to power. The world viewed from inside, the world defined and
determined according to its "intelligible character"––– it would be "will to power" and nothing else.
The quote above is the clearest definition of the will to power. From this passage, I think that it is
the driving force of life. This will to power is the reason for life and is the purpose of life.
Physiologists should think before putting down the instinct of self–preservation as the cardinal
instinct of an organic being. A living thing seeks above all to discharge its strength–––life itself is
will to power; self–preservation is only one of the indirect and most frequent results. This

Quite possibly the most poignant and eye–opening relationship of the entire play of Hamlet and his
mother, becomes sabotaged by Hamlet internalizing Catholic driven dogma. People often resort to
using religion as a moral compass to give their lives structure and personal guidance. Friedrich
Nietzsche, a prominent figure associated with the existential movement states in his book, Beyond
Good and Evil, that "Perhaps one the most solemn concepts which have occasioned the most strife
and suffering, the concepts 'God' and 'sin', will one day seem to us of no more importance than a
child's toy and a child's troubles" (82). Clearly, Nietzsche actively rejects the concept of committing
sins, which is the binding force in most religions. To begin, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man." (King James Bible,
Corinthians. 11. 8–9). Women are clearly subordinate to men from a biblical perspective and Hamlet
adopts this notion upon evaluation of his mother's personal choices. As a woman, Gertrude is unable
to be seen for who she truly is. Rather, her worth as a person is observed through the lens of
whatever male partner she has in her life. Claudius, as a husband, has power over his mother and is
able to stain her, giving her shame and brings dishonour to the kingdom. Hamlet also addresses
honour within his soliloquy. Despite the two playing equal parts in the relationship, it is Gertrude
who is Hamlet sees as scandalous and a disgrace because of the marriage. This all adds up to Hamlet
vilifying his own mother by prioritizing God's values over respecting the only person in his life who
he truly loves. This sacrifice massively contributes to his downfall. Thus, through Hamlet
implementing Catholic morals in his life in an effort to cope with his father's death, he deteriorates
the now dicey relationship with his mother and makes him responsible for his life's decline. PEE 4,
LOVE OF GOD

Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
"Beyond Good and Evil" by Friedrich Nietzsche
In "Beyond Good and Evil," Friedrich Nietzsche analyzes in a philosophical way what makes one
good or evil. He goes onto explaining the spiritual aspect of one's self and how everything else
flows from it, from one's spirit – from the inside. Also, he points out the challenges and struggle one
faces when choosing to follow one's own convictions instead of the ones imposed onto us. I'll go
onto analyzing his choice of words, their meaning in his arguments and how I relate his philosophy
to my own.
In the first line of the first paragraph, with the word "beyond" Nietzsche portrays that when our
actions are based on love there's no reasoning that could surpass it. It shows that love weights more
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The people I've met that have inspired me to live up to my own standards and beliefs and stand
strong in them are the ones that most of the time go with the flow. If they feel it in their spirit to do
it, they don't consider what would be said, they act on their love for themselves and as Nietzsche
argues, there is no right or wrong answer in that. Then, he mentions the "wicked game." These last
few months I feel like that's the game I've been playing, the one in which you choose to risk it all,
even your family's support and defy all odds just to be who you've been created to be.
The "wicked game" is the one in which you decide to cross the line of the unspoken rules of society
and once you do, people think you are insane for daring to do what nobody else has done, for daring
to think and act outside of the box they've made sure you never get out. Daily, it is a risk I take, to be
talk down and being seen as too different. Like Nietzsche himself says, a "warlike man" because of
all of the dreams and ambitions troubling him inside but yet, peaceful, for he is at peace with all of
them, with

Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
It should be noted that Nietzsche did not directly address the issue of the limitations of power.
Similarly, he did not give a direct estimate of power in terms of "good" or "bad". He was more
inclined to consider these phenomena from beyond good and evil. Nevertheless, the book implicitly
contains answers to these questions, although their analysis will require some interpretation of the
author's ideas. One can argue that the way Nietzsche described the features of confrontation between
the "master morality" and "slave morality" (153) is how he reflected on the general characteristics
and the fate of the will to power. In his work "Beyond Good and Evil," which is also a "prelude to a
philosophy of the future," Nietzsche assured that modern ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The will to power is an inherent characteristic of life itself and, at the same time, an expression of
the will to live. In turn, life in its very essence is "a process of appropriating, injuring, overpowering
the alien and the weaker, oppressing, being harsh, imposing your own form, incorporating, and at
least, the very least, exploiting" (153). In this context, the degeneracy of masters or aristocracy is
related to the appearance of the desire to account for people of lower level that are unequal to
themselves. This indicates the extinction of the will to power, which degenerates into the will to
obey. For instance, in an effort to reduce itself to "a mere function of the kingdom" at the expense of
its position of "dominant authority," the aristocracy soon lost this kingship as well (152). Therefore,
it can be argued that the definition of power boundaries implicitly contained in Nietzsche's work is
that people have the power to the extent, to which they have no desire to place one's own will "on
pair with the other's" (152). Moreover, noble individuals "have duties only towards their own kind"
(155). In addition, in the light of the master morality, a good man is the one who has more power: "it
is 'good' that inspires and wants to inspire fear" (156). On the contrary, slave morality perceives evil
as powerful and

The Prologue And Part One Of The Book ' Nietzsche '
Whether the happening be good or bad, humans tend to rationalize the circumstance and make it an
event that served a greater purpose. In Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche, Zarathustra
describes this behavior, along with many others, as life denying as he was mainly concerned with
ethics. The prologue tells the story of how Zarathustra went up a mountain and spent ten years there
gaining wisdom; he then descends to share his wisdom but the people laugh at him and he comes to
realize that they did not and would not take him seriously because they were too far gone with old
beliefs. He also came to the conclusion that he did not want people who conform and do not think
for themselves, or followers, but rather people who desire to go in the same direction he is going.
Throughout the prologue and part one of the book Nietzsche is trying to teach those who can think
for themselves about how to live well and without excuses. The prologue mainly consists of
Zarathustra descending from the mountain back into the town and realizing that no one takes him
seriously. Zarathustra is discouraged at first but then realizes that he was not targeting the right
audience and begins again. He starts off by establishing an overman, who is someone who can
affirm and embrace life completely without any excuses. Consecutively he establishes a last man,
who is said to be someone who has no questions, no chaos, no creativity, and seeks comfort and
security. His view of man is a cross

Religion In Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil
Ever since the inception of his writings, Nietzsche has been pointed to and predominately described
as an atheist, however within the work, Beyond Good and Evil, it is revealed otherwise. Nietzsche
considers several different roles for religion in past, present, and future polities. The roles that
religion play within Nietzsche's vision of a future creation and establishment of world–affirming
values is dependent upon the class of the individual. It is found in the various sections of The
religious character within Beyond Good and Evil, that religion can be utilized by different classes of
people for different world affirmations. The high ranking officials are able to use religion as a tool to
relate and control their subjects, while the middle ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
61, p. 54), the philosopher. The philosopher makes use of religion for education and breeding.
Apparently, this done in a matter that is nonspecific since, according to Nietzsche, this utilization is
no different the using the, "...prevailing political and economic situation." (Sec. 61, p. 54). The
philosopher is the only truly trusted individual when it comes to religion. This is put forth since
philosophers are always questioning the deeper meaning and putting to the test. It is also found that,
as Nietzsche says, "...there is a high and horrible price to pay when religions do not serve as means
for breeding and education in the hands of a philosopher..." (Sec. 62, p. 55). What Nietzsche is
arguing is that once religion has gone past the utilization as a tool to affirming the world, and has
become the affirmation of the world, then society has sunken back into

Good Vs. Evil : How Do People Become Evil?
Matthew Sinnadurai
Professor Boris Hennig
PHL 201
February 22, 2015
Good vs. Evil: How do People Become Evil?
Through the centuries, the words 'good' and 'evil' have been used extensively to describe certain
things or situations. The subject of good versus evil is one that often causes great debate as the two
terms are not facts, but entirely subjective. When people are born, we presume they are innocent,
because as infants they are not capable of carrying out actions that are evil, or good. They are a
clean slate, and as time goes on their experiences in life will shape them into the sort of person other
people will know them as. Most people grow up to become law abiding citizens, so in a sense good
people as they aren't breaking any laws. However, some people tend to stray off the path, and end up
going down a darker one. Somewhere along this person's life, something went wrong and caused
them to become a bad person. In the film the Dark Knight, the character of Harvey Dent begins the
film as a selfless politician trying to rid his city of the corruption it faces. However after the death of
his would–be fiancée and scarring of the left side of his face and body, he becomes a homicidal
threat to society. The character of Harvey Dent shows that while we do naturally seek to do good,
corrupting external and internal influences are what cause us to commit evil.
In order to understand if someone is good or evil, one must first understand what exactly are good
and evil?

Beyond Good And Evil
Moby–Dick by Herman Melville sets the scene on a whaling ship, the Pequod. In addition to
exploring the horrors that occur on the ocean, the novel reflects one of the statements found in
Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil: "He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he
thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee."
Nietzsche claims that when one strongly despises the evil, the evil will contaminate one's mind and
sense of justice. Melville demonstrates this concept through character development. Because
Captain Ahab pursues the monster, Moby Dick, he also becomes monstrous. In the beginning of the
book, Ahab clearly sees Moby Dick as the monster. When Ahab is persuading the ... Show more
In the beginning, everyone is pursuing whales: Ishmael goes on a whaling ship to whale; Queequeg
is an experienced harpooner; everyone on the Pequod is determined to hunt whale for profit, and
Ahab is especially determined to kill Moby Dick. While the crew members pursue the monster, they
gradually develop some monstrous qualities, especially Ahab, who turns demonic in the end.
Additionally, Ishmael claims that humans are fairly similar to whales. He asks, "And what are you,
reader, but a Loose–Fish and a Fast–Fish, too" (435). He claims that the way everyone in the society
operates is similar to how whale ships treat whales. In a grander sense, the society is the whaler, and
humans are the whales. People are fast fish –– whales claimed by a particular ship –– because they
are controlled by certain regulations; people are also loose fish –– free whales that have no
affiliation with any ship in particular –– because the principles of liberty and the individual rights
are established on the basis of the concept of being loose. As Ishmael claims, as the ship progresses
in its search for Moby Dick, the distinction between men and whales becomes more

Knowing Otherworldly Goodness Through Worldly Evils
Humans come to understand experiences through the basic functions of the mind. The word
"experience" refers not only to personal involvement in certain events, but also to anything that can
be detected through the senses, ie: people, inanimate objects, and feelings. The ability to define,
categorize, extend knowledge onto other things, and compare are the most fundamental functions.
Without these functions, we could not gather knowledge from our experiences, nor could we arrive
at any conclusions about their significance. The physical world would ultimately be unintelligible.
This leads to the question of how we can understand things that are not in the physical world, like
God. Our senses cannot directly experience things outside ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Because He is the 3–0 God, there cannot be any evil that would match His goodness. This would
undermine His power, thus making Him not God. Because there is no equally powerful force of evil,
we must extend our earthly experiences of evil to try to understand an otherworldly good. It is
possible we can never fully understand the goodness of God, even if we make it to heaven to
directly experience Him. Thomas Aquinas speaks of theoretically studying God, which implies that
an understanding of God is not easily acquired. If spirits in heaven who directly observe and
experience God have to study Him to reach an understanding, we are much further off from reaching
an understanding of God's goodness during our earthly existences. The believer will still try to fully
understand God, despite the guarantee that he cannot achieve full understand while on Earth. The
resources the believer has available to him to understand this infinitely good God are his mind and
his experiences. The mind and all its reasoning abilities can be trusted to arrive at some
understanding of God, as our minds are but one of God's creations. We all experience evil of some
sort, whether it is egregious evil or tolerable evil. For the most part, none of us have experienced an
evil that is comparable to the worst evils this world has known – perhaps the most evil being the
Holocaust. This evil inflicted abundant

What Is The Moral Of Spoke Zebra
If a zebra is marked with a big red "X", not only does the herd outcast it but it is also the likely
candidate to be the lion's meal. Being in a herd seems beneficial for survival but it comes with costs
that may not be worth it. In Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche, Zarathustra describes
being part of a herd, along with many other actions, as life–denying. His concerns are ethics and
living well. In the prologue, Nietzsche tells the story of how Zarathustra went up a mountain and
spent ten years there gaining wisdom on life; he then descends to share his wisdom, but the people
laugh at him and he comes to realize that they did not and would not take him seriously because
they were too far gone with old beliefs and ways. He also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The most important part of his claims on how to restore the quality of life, is that they all go hand in
hand. One does not achieve one and move to the next but rather, one works on achieving them all.
They are set up to have equal importance; there is no hierarchy. All of his claims are correlative and
will bring about a well–lived life, there is no doubt about that. Nietzsche's perspective on the quality
of life people are currently living is accurate meaning that he understand what he is proclaiming
when he states his ideas on how to better it. His goal is to encourage those who are willing to hear
him, to be creative, free, self–fulfilling individuals. If one agrees and decides to abide by his claims,
their life shall be just like living as a marked

Nietzsche Evil

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Angie Willis

More from Angie Willis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Nietzsche Evil