1
 Minimize:
 Landfilling & Hauling
 Pollution
 Disposal costs

 Maximize:
 Diversion rate
 Recycling percentage
 Renewable energy
 Alternative Technology:
 Modern
 Cost effective (ROI)
 Reference sites
2
Waste challenges
 Main advantages:
 Excellent for treating the biodegradable organics of the waste.
 Moisture in the input is a blessing.
 A natural way, with very low emissions, if at all.
 Available Mechanical Biological Treatments
 Dry separation + Aerobic composting (Composting).
 Dry separation + Anaerobic Digestion (AD).
 Main problems:
 The non-biodegradable materials must be fully pre-sorted.
 If not – The output of the biological treatment is contaminated and unusable.
3
Biological Treatment
MAIN UNSOLVED PROBLEM:
HOW TO SEPARATE AND TREAT THE BIODEGRADABLE ORGANICS ?
ArrowBio:
Hydro Mechanical Separation
+
Multi stage Anaerobic Digestion
--------------------------------------------------
= Clean organic stream + Green Energy + Recyclable Materials
4
THE OPTIMAL SOLUTION
ArrowBio
Fact :
Biodegradable organics behave different than other materials, while in water
Process Logic
Hydro Mechanical Separation &
Preparation
Multi Stage Anaerobic
Digestion
SBR
Technological Brief
 Separation Process
• Unique Hydro mechanical Separation
• Clean Organic to AD process
• Use of materials for recycling
 Anaerobic treatment
• A two stage fast anaerobic process
• Mesophilic process .
• 97% of water are recycled.
• Production of Biogas and Electricity
10/2015 6
Sorting
Vat
Unders Overs
Eddy
Current
Manual cardboard, paper
& plastic separation
From Solid to Liquid
Landfill
Manual Bulky
items removal
Landfill
Bailer
1st Trommel &
bag opening
Unders
Magnet
2nd Trommel &
bag opening
Film plastics
air separation
Manual cardboard
separation
Film plastics
air separation
Heavy
materials
Trommel
screening
Light
materials
Unders
Film plastics
air separation
Shredder
1
Bailer Containers
Overs
Wet
shredder
Sand Container
Shredder
2
Film plastics
air separation
Organics
Overs
Plastics
separation
Overs
Magnet
Hydro CrusherScreening ModuleLiquid reservoir and
pumps to Biological
Unders
Medium
Liquid reservoir and
pumps to Biological
+ residue settling
Fine
Filter
Glass Container
Hydro
Cyclone
Coarse Screen Unders stream to anaerobic process
Sand Container
Hydro CrusherScreening ModuleLiquid reservoir and
pumps to Biological
Unders
Medium
Liquid reservoir and
pumps to Biological
+ residue settling
Fine
Filter
Glass Container
Hydro
Cyclone
Bailer ContainerContainer
Container
Fine Screen Unders stream
Coarse Screen Unders stream to anaerobic process
Fine Screen Unders stream
Container
Shredder
3
ContainerContainers
Methanogenic
Low Solid Reactor
Thickening system
De- watering
system
Balance Tank
Solids Removal
Contaminants
Screening
Coarse Screen Unders stream Fine Screen Unders stream
Anaerobic Digester
Aerobic Reactor
(SBR)
Biogas Tank
Generator
Biological Treatment
Landfill
Biogas
Soil
Amendment
container
Acetogenic
reactor
Oversize
Liquid
Sludge
Liquid
Liquid
Suspended Solid
removal
Liquid
Sewage
Sludge
Separation Vats
Biogas
Electricity + Heat
Liquid
Stabilized solids
Liquid
Recyclables and by products
9
Ferrous metals
PET
HDPE Biogas & Power
production
Film Plastic
GlassNon-Ferrous
PaperCardboard Sand
Fertilizer
ArrowBio Soil Experiments
 Send only 20%-30% of the waste to Landfill (mainly inert residues)
 Substantially increase recycling percentages (70%+)
 90%-95% of materials are separated
 Minimize pollution of Landfills and Incinerators
 Competitive waste treatment costs
 Produce renewable electricity & high quality digestate
 Become Environmental leaders
 Create new green jobs
11
Customer’s motivations
12
POLAND 2017
13
New Separation- Tel Aviv
14
New AD – Tel Aviv
Biogas content ~ 60% - 70% Methane
100 m3 biogas / ton organic MSW @ 60% Methane
Heating value ~ 0.24 MWhr / ton of organic MSW
Electricity Generation ~ 90 kWhr / ton of organic MSW
CNG ~ 5.5 m3 biogas = 1 GGE – Gallon of Gasoline Equivalent
15
Estimated Figures
16
ArrowBio plant 500 1000 1500
Daily Capacity 500 tons/day 1,000 tons/day 1,500 tons/day
Annual Capacity 150K tons/year 300K tons/year 450K tons/year
Biogas production* 30-40K m3/day 60-80K m3/day 100-120K m3/day
Green Electricity* 3-4 MWh 6-8 MWh 10-12 MWh
Consumed Electricity 1.5 MWh 3 MWh 4 MWh
Workers 40 per shift 60 per shift 90 per shift
Footprint 30,000 m2 40,000 m2 60,000 m2
Estimated cost USD 40 M USD 70 M USD 95 M
* To be defined during Preliminary Planning Study, analyzing current situation, land, requirements, work split etc.
17

MSW solid waste management

  • 1.
  • 2.
     Minimize:  Landfilling& Hauling  Pollution  Disposal costs   Maximize:  Diversion rate  Recycling percentage  Renewable energy  Alternative Technology:  Modern  Cost effective (ROI)  Reference sites 2 Waste challenges
  • 3.
     Main advantages: Excellent for treating the biodegradable organics of the waste.  Moisture in the input is a blessing.  A natural way, with very low emissions, if at all.  Available Mechanical Biological Treatments  Dry separation + Aerobic composting (Composting).  Dry separation + Anaerobic Digestion (AD).  Main problems:  The non-biodegradable materials must be fully pre-sorted.  If not – The output of the biological treatment is contaminated and unusable. 3 Biological Treatment MAIN UNSOLVED PROBLEM: HOW TO SEPARATE AND TREAT THE BIODEGRADABLE ORGANICS ?
  • 4.
    ArrowBio: Hydro Mechanical Separation + Multistage Anaerobic Digestion -------------------------------------------------- = Clean organic stream + Green Energy + Recyclable Materials 4 THE OPTIMAL SOLUTION ArrowBio Fact : Biodegradable organics behave different than other materials, while in water
  • 5.
    Process Logic Hydro MechanicalSeparation & Preparation Multi Stage Anaerobic Digestion SBR
  • 6.
    Technological Brief  SeparationProcess • Unique Hydro mechanical Separation • Clean Organic to AD process • Use of materials for recycling  Anaerobic treatment • A two stage fast anaerobic process • Mesophilic process . • 97% of water are recycled. • Production of Biogas and Electricity 10/2015 6
  • 7.
    Sorting Vat Unders Overs Eddy Current Manual cardboard,paper & plastic separation From Solid to Liquid Landfill Manual Bulky items removal Landfill Bailer 1st Trommel & bag opening Unders Magnet 2nd Trommel & bag opening Film plastics air separation Manual cardboard separation Film plastics air separation Heavy materials Trommel screening Light materials Unders Film plastics air separation Shredder 1 Bailer Containers Overs Wet shredder Sand Container Shredder 2 Film plastics air separation Organics Overs Plastics separation Overs Magnet Hydro CrusherScreening ModuleLiquid reservoir and pumps to Biological Unders Medium Liquid reservoir and pumps to Biological + residue settling Fine Filter Glass Container Hydro Cyclone Coarse Screen Unders stream to anaerobic process Sand Container Hydro CrusherScreening ModuleLiquid reservoir and pumps to Biological Unders Medium Liquid reservoir and pumps to Biological + residue settling Fine Filter Glass Container Hydro Cyclone Bailer ContainerContainer Container Fine Screen Unders stream Coarse Screen Unders stream to anaerobic process Fine Screen Unders stream Container Shredder 3 ContainerContainers
  • 8.
    Methanogenic Low Solid Reactor Thickeningsystem De- watering system Balance Tank Solids Removal Contaminants Screening Coarse Screen Unders stream Fine Screen Unders stream Anaerobic Digester Aerobic Reactor (SBR) Biogas Tank Generator Biological Treatment Landfill Biogas Soil Amendment container Acetogenic reactor Oversize Liquid Sludge Liquid Liquid Suspended Solid removal Liquid Sewage Sludge Separation Vats Biogas Electricity + Heat Liquid Stabilized solids Liquid
  • 9.
    Recyclables and byproducts 9 Ferrous metals PET HDPE Biogas & Power production Film Plastic GlassNon-Ferrous PaperCardboard Sand Fertilizer
  • 10.
  • 11.
     Send only20%-30% of the waste to Landfill (mainly inert residues)  Substantially increase recycling percentages (70%+)  90%-95% of materials are separated  Minimize pollution of Landfills and Incinerators  Competitive waste treatment costs  Produce renewable electricity & high quality digestate  Become Environmental leaders  Create new green jobs 11 Customer’s motivations
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    14 New AD –Tel Aviv
  • 15.
    Biogas content ~60% - 70% Methane 100 m3 biogas / ton organic MSW @ 60% Methane Heating value ~ 0.24 MWhr / ton of organic MSW Electricity Generation ~ 90 kWhr / ton of organic MSW CNG ~ 5.5 m3 biogas = 1 GGE – Gallon of Gasoline Equivalent 15
  • 16.
    Estimated Figures 16 ArrowBio plant500 1000 1500 Daily Capacity 500 tons/day 1,000 tons/day 1,500 tons/day Annual Capacity 150K tons/year 300K tons/year 450K tons/year Biogas production* 30-40K m3/day 60-80K m3/day 100-120K m3/day Green Electricity* 3-4 MWh 6-8 MWh 10-12 MWh Consumed Electricity 1.5 MWh 3 MWh 4 MWh Workers 40 per shift 60 per shift 90 per shift Footprint 30,000 m2 40,000 m2 60,000 m2 Estimated cost USD 40 M USD 70 M USD 95 M * To be defined during Preliminary Planning Study, analyzing current situation, land, requirements, work split etc.
  • 17.