The document summarizes key points from the book "Drive" about engagement-driven management styles being more effective than traditional reward/punishment styles, especially for complex creative tasks. It describes an experiment where groups trying to attach a candle to a wall without a box performed better without incentives. Engagement styles focus on autonomy, mastery, and purpose over directives and rewards/punishments. These foster creativity needed for future jobs over simplistic left-brain tasks prone to automation. Companies should assess if jobs allow autonomy, mastery and purpose to attract high-drive employees.
Yaroslav Rozhankivskyy: Три складові і три передумови максимальної продуктивн...
Mobilizing engagement
1. 1
Let me explain
Becoming a more
creative,
Engagement driven
Management
style company
Source: DRIVE, Daniel H. Pink, Canongate Books, 2010
2. 2
The Candle Problem Experiment
Was conducted first 40 years ago. Then, every year after that.
The Candle
Problem
Using what is on the table, put the candle on the wall,
not touching the table. Do it the best possible way.
3. 3
(1) The 1st group was only asked to
solve the problem as fast as possible
and given an average time.
(1) The 1st group was only asked to
solve the problem as fast as possible
and given an average time.
(2) The 2nd group was given rewards, US$5
for the top 25% of the group, US$25 for the very top person.
(1) The 1st group was only asked to
solve the problem as fast as possible
and given an average time.
(2) The 2nd group was given rewards, US$5
for the top 25% of the group, US$25 for the very top person.
(3) The 3rd group was told the bottom 5% would have to pay US$5.
Quick replies…….
Some guessed the answer was to melt the side of
candle and attach it to the wall.
Others guessed attaching the candle with the tacks.
Both were wrong.
Candle Problem Experiment
The Candle
Problem Case #1
Source for this study: Sam Blacksburg, Psychology Department Princeton University
For a recent study, three groups
of 50 people each were tested.
(1) The 1st group was only asked to
solve the problem as fast as possible
and given an average time.
(2) The 2nd group was given rewards, US$5
for the top 25% of the group, US$25 for the very top person.
(3) The 3rd group was told the bottom 5% would have to pay US$5.
4. 4
Answer
Candle Problem Case #1
Groups’ Results:
The first group with no incentives at all solved it
3-1/2 minutes faster than group two and three.
5. 5
For this task……..
Reward Management Technique
(pay for fastest)
…..more money, prizes, trips to
foreign countries, other rewards…
Special recognition,
promotion, high status….
did not work.
The problem is “functional fixedness” (One object has one purpose, box holds tacks).
6. 6
Result:
Pressure management techniques did not work.
Pressure Management Technique
(told slowest would pay)
Threat of demotion,
cut in pay, loss of job
Angry boss, embarrassing
person, teasing, etc.
7. 7
Place the candle on the wall and off the
table using the best possible method.
This time the tacks are out of
the box.
The same size of group (50 people each)
were tested.
(1) The 1st group was only asked to solve the problem as fast as possible
and give an average time. (No incentives)
(2) The 2nd group was give rewards, US$5 for the top 25% of the group,
US$25 for the very top person. (Incentives)
(3) The 3rd group was told the bottom 5% would have to pay US$5.
(Pressure)
Results:
The second group scored 5 minutes faster than
group one and three. Incentives worked.
Candle Problem - Case #2
The Candle
Problem
8. 8
Use of left-brain
-Uses logic
-Detail assignments
-Narrow focus
-Works with facts best
-Works in present-past
-Works with current information
-One specific answer
9. 9
The use of incentives or fear tactics can
work in the short term for some tasks.
Use of left-brain
11. 11
Incentives and fear tactics do not work
for complex tasks.
Best management technique
for complex strategies
They narrow a person’s thinking, not broaden
it to look around for solutions.
12. 12
Rewards and fear can stop progress
when concentration is required.
I want the bonus so
much that I can’t
think of a solution for
the project.
There is so much
stress to solve
the problem that I
can’t think clearly.
13. 13
The right brain is used 90% of the time for
managers and 70% of the time for salesmen.
So, what management
technique is best for
this more creative
type of work?
They…..
Develop business plans.
Create new sales presentations.
Broaden the customer base.
Imagine new promotion.
Research for new products.
Look for new business possibilities.
14. 14
Engagement driven management
for complex assignments
There are three independent strategies:There are three independent strategies:
1. Autonomy – Let people work on any problem freely to
expand collaboration and discussion. “Here is the
problem. Come up with a solution any way you like.”
There are three independent strategies:
1. Autonomy – Let people work on any problem freely to
expand collaboration and discussion. “Here is the
problem. Come up with a solution any way you like.”
2. Mastery – Give people time to learn, practice and
experiment.
There are three independent strategies:
1. Autonomy – Let people work on any problem freely to
expand collaboration and discussion. “Here is the
problem. Come up with a solution any way you like.”
2. Mastery – Give people time to learn, practice and
experiment.
3. Purpose – Convince people there is a high chance of
success and great value to themselves and others.
There are three independent strategies:
1. Autonomy – Let people work on any problem freely to
expand collaboration and discussion. “Here is the
problem. Come up with a solution any way you like.”
2. Mastery – Give people time to learn, practice and
experiment.
3. Purpose – Convince people there is a high chance of
success and great value to themselves and others.
15. 15
(low) (high)
SupportiveBehavior
Supportive Behavior is only being available when the
person needs or asks for help, and is giving recognition
when warranted (high employee autonomy).
High Supportive
Low Directive
Behavior
High Directive
High Supportive
Behavior
SUPPORTING COACHING
DELEGATING DIRECTING
High Directive
Low Supportive
Behavior
Low Supportive
Low Directive
Behavior
Directive Behavior is usually one-way communication. It is
giving the person activities (low employee autonomy).
(low)(high)
Directive Behavior
Basic Leadership Styles
16. 16
Competence: The level of knowledge and skills the person has.
Commitment: A combination of confidence and motivation.
Highly Developed Developing
Very High
Competence
Higher
Competence
High
Commitment
Varying
Commitment
Low
Commitment
Low
Competence
High
Commitment
Higher
Competence
D1D2D3D4
Level of professionalism
Four levels of staff development
17. 17
Development Level of Staff
The Four Leadership Styles
SupportiveBehavior
Matching Leadership Style
to Staff Development
18. 18
Management style for creative right-brain work
like planning, research, forecasting, etc.
Development Level of Staff
The Four Leadership Styles
SupportiveBehavior
19. 19
Task Examples - Management Procedures
No
Yes
Marketing
Manager
Sales Executive
Business Strategy Planning
Autonomy, master and purpose work.
Delivery person Painter Order ProcessingTraffic direction
Rewards & punishment work in the short-term.
Product designer
Training
Manager
Is the task
simple and
routine?
(yes or no)
20. 20
Determining Task Management Procedure
Explain the task
necessity.
Yes
No
Acknowledge that
the work is boring.
Allow the person
to perform the task
in his own way.Work on autonomy,
mastery and purpose.
Yes
Use rewards with three
conditions.No
Can you make it more
interesting/challenging?
Is the task
simple and
routine?
(yes or no)
21. 21
Determining Task Management Procedure
Is the task
simple and
routine?
(yes or no)
Yes
No
Can you make it more
interesting/challenging?
Work on autonomy,
mastery and purpose
Yes
Avoid all
“if…then”
rewards or
punishment.
Consider
unexpected, non-
contingent
“now…that”
rewards.
Second, the rewards
provide useful
information rather than
an attempt to control.
First, The rewards are
in the form of praise
and feedback, rather
than things people can
touch or spend.
22. 22
-Uses logic
-Detail assignments
-Narrow focus
-Works with facts best
-Works in present-past
-Works with current information
-One specific answer
1. Automation – Left-brain activities are easy to automate.
The job is lost to a computer.
1. Automation – Left-brain activities are easy to automate.
The job is lost to a computer.
2. Overseas – These activities are easy to send overseas to
low labor cost countries.
1. Automation – Left-brain activities are easy to automate.
The job is lost to a computer.
2. Overseas – These activities are easy to send overseas to
low labor cost countries.
3. Replacement – It is easy to train people on jobs that only
use the left-brain. Therefore, you could be replaced easily.
1. Automation – Left-brain activities are easy to automate.
The job is lost to a computer.
2. Overseas – These activities are easy to send overseas to
low labor cost countries.
3. Replacement – It is easy to train people on jobs that only
use the left-brain. Therefore, you could be replaced easily.
4. Abundance – The left-brain only works in the present. In a
society of abundance, new products must be developed
and designed (right-brain activities).
The weakness of left-brain activities
24. 24
Engagement driven management
- Ask these questions -
If the answers are
“yes”, take the job.
1. Autonomy – Can I work on what I want at
least part of the time at this company?
1. Autonomy – Can I work on what I want at
least part of the time at this company?
2. Mastery – Can I learn new things and skills
at least part of the time at this company?
1. Autonomy – Can I work on what I want at
least part of the time at this company?
2. Mastery – Can I learn new things and skills
at least part of the time at this company?
3. Purpose – Do I think what this company is
doing now and for the future important?
Yes,
High drive
No,
Low drive
Source: DRIVE, Daniel H. Pink, Canongate Books, 2010
25. 25
Thank You
Look for companies with a dominant
engagement driven management
style and you will have a company
with a future.
Source: DRIVE, Daniel H. Pink, Canongate Books, 2010